Re: Protection

1

Let's see, off the top of my head in my circle of friends, close to 100%. Plus one using Norplant.

I've only taken it for just over a year, but some of them have been on it for ten.

horizontal rule
2

What's ol' 8. up to these days?

horizontal rule
3

You can't beat it for reliability, after all; relying on any kind of barrier method makes your human error risk skyrocket. (I use an IUD, which comes close to or matches the Pill for reliability, but I think most doctors won't prescribe those other than for married women with children -- liability fears.)

horizontal rule
4

We really need some movement on the man-pill.

horizontal rule
5

AKA the "mill".

horizontal rule
6

You're all grist for my mill.

horizontal rule
7

Man-pill I thought was too difficult; preventing one egg vs. 2-3 million sperm sort of thing.

horizontal rule
8

No one can stop all the sperm!

horizontal rule
9

I've found taking a daily mutlivitamin to be a nearly impossible resolution, so there's that.

horizontal rule
10

There's also the social problem of relying on someone else for unverifiable birth control. I can see it for men in committed monogamous relationships, but for anyone else I'd expect the response to be: "Sure you're on the pill. Now put on this condom." I suppose the guy gets additional peace of mind out of it, but it's not an alternative to other birth-control, just a supplement.

horizontal rule
11

Not merely because there is no such thing as a mutlivitamin.

horizontal rule
12

"Sure you're on the pill. Now put on this condom."

Not to mention in the non-monogamous situation, there's "Sure you're on the pill. What STDs do you have?" issue.

horizontal rule
13

there is no such thing as a mutlivitamin.

Google says different.

horizontal rule
14

Is it really a surprise that a large % of 20 and 30-something women are?

horizontal rule
15

The majority of child-bearing age women I know are on the pill, though I know several who couldn't find one that didn't make them crazy. Body chemistry varies so widely that it's really hard to generalize pharmaceutical experiences across a population.

The IUD is pretty much the best of all contraceptive worlds.

horizontal rule
16

I am on the patch, but only for the last five months or so. I should leave this comment at Becks's place; heck maybe I will, but that's interesting, because it's done a lot of good things for me; it's been good for my skin, my periods are definitely easier, but I have noticed something a little bit wrong with my sex drive, especially as compared to my previous three-times-a-day energy, and wasn't sure what to attribute it to.

horizontal rule
17

like smasher, it's a good thing I don't have to take a pill everyday to keep myself alive, otherwise, I'd be dead.

horizontal rule
18

Not that it doesn't have its own flaws, says the woman who used to have light, cramp-free periods. (Not that they're all that bad now, but there's been a distinct negative effect.)

horizontal rule
19

18 to 15.

horizontal rule
20

Is it really a surprise

It is to me, because it wasn't true of my girlfriends, but that might be because they were all borderline nuts (in the best possible way) and couldn't take it.

horizontal rule
21

I guess it could be a surprise to you guys because a lot of women won't admit they're on it to their partners until they've known them for a while. If their partners assume they're not on the Pill, they worry about pregnancy and don't fight the idea of condoms.

horizontal rule
22

Good to see the double-posting problem has been addressed.

horizontal rule
23

10: I don't think I could trust that a guy was on the manpill unless I was feeding it to him. Too risky.

I was surprised that the NYT article, well, hadn't been written already. My friends joke that the Pill works by making you uninterested in sex; see, perfect contraception!

horizontal rule
24

I never had trouble with the Pill, but have you and your friends been going back for different prescriptions? Friends of mine who've had libido or other emotional effects have had some success with switching brands.

horizontal rule
25

Some folks I've known who had libido issues with the Pill also had better luck with the progesterone-only pill.

horizontal rule
26

24 - If I were to go back on it, I'd definitely try a different brand and would go in with a more critical eye for symptoms. Like I said, though, I never realized anything was up.

horizontal rule
27

My sister collected $70 k for Dalkon Shield problems, but it wasn't worth it.

horizontal rule
28

Also, I think Ogged just linked to my post to out me as part of the Not Getting Any club to all of Unfogged so he wouldn't feel so alone. Thanks for that.

horizontal rule
29

Mind-body stuff is weird that way, it's very hard to think of your feelings as something affected by biochemistry. I don't get much in the way of period-related emotional effects, but I get wicked mood swings when I'm knocked up. The first time I was pregnant, it took me a month or two to figure out how to step back and think "All right, I normally wouldn't want to knife the deli guy for spilling my coffee a little. This probably isn't a genuine emotion so much. Take a deep breath and let it pass."

horizontal rule
30

I've been saying and I've been saying, there's something both of you could do about that.

horizontal rule
31

30 to 28, of course.

horizontal rule
32

But who knows when ogged will next be where Becks is (NY & DC, right?)? Whereas I do know when I'll next be in NY.

The way forward is clear!

horizontal rule
33

Wolfson!

horizontal rule
34

Happy Horror Story Time!

A very good friend of mine fit the profile of Beck and her friend: was proscribed the Pill at around 14, went off it after breaking up with a long-time boyfriend in her twenties, and realized that the Pill had been doing strange things to her body. And then.... she gained twenty pounds, her body odor changed, she started growing a lot more hair, she started breaking out worse than she'd ever experienced before, and didn't get her period for another two years. Terrifying.

She's now on the ring (the hormones are localized) and very happy about it.

horizontal rule
35

Jesus Jackmormon. I'd hate to hear your scary horror stories.

horizontal rule
36

Yow.

horizontal rule
37

Yow. Nothing in 34 has happened to anyone I know thank god. Only good happy things.

horizontal rule
38

"Wait, are most twenty- and thirty-something women in our social circle on the pill?"

Yes.

horizontal rule
39

is yow the new yikes?

horizontal rule
40

Jackmormon needs 2 more anecdotes to match my Sunday Styles-worthy level of credibility. (Or so I keep repeating to myself over and over.)

horizontal rule
41

I've known women who had really severe physical reactions to Depo-Provera and Norplant - hair falling out, etc. I've also known women who swore by them as the greatest thing since sliced bread.

The moral of the story? YMMV.

horizontal rule
42

A friend of mine went absolutely batshit after getting the whatchamacallit injection. Bouts of sobbing would occur to her like a sneeze, and she was repulsed by the notion of sex. But her rebound was very quick after the expiration (and very powerful, to the happy surprise of her boyfriend).

horizontal rule
43

This "friend" is you, right?

horizontal rule
44

43--no.

horizontal rule
45

I think 43 was meant for me. Matt F, what can I say, I didn't read the label.

horizontal rule
46

The main goals of the man pill were not to stop all the sperm but to make them poor swimmers that couldn't penetrate the egg (the nifty sugar pill--binds with the sperm so that the egg can't).

Some doctors noted that blood pressure medicine (nifedipine) prevented some couples from conceiving.

There are also occlusive plugs, which I think has been tried in India. There is very little money for contraceptive research in this country. The research leading to the Pill was funded primarily neither by government nor by industry but by a feminist philanthropist.

I am scared of the Pill and anything that would muck with those hormones, since I already have bad mood swings which I treat with drugs.

horizontal rule
47

It was indeed meant for the Smasher. 34 sounds like a horrific experience, not exactly a joke-appropriate comment.

horizontal rule
48

Bostoniangirl- for what it's worth, I think the pill tends to stabilize mood swings at least as often as it exacerbates them.

Of course that doesn't make it any less of a sinful abomination against nature.

horizontal rule
49

47--It was indeed pretty awful and disorienting, but since my friend was (and now again is) drop-dead gorgeous as a baseline, this era of wierd fuckeduppedness also coincided with her streak of sleeping with male models. So it could have been worse, I guess. And I don't take offense easily around here, so no worries.

horizontal rule
50

the pill tends to stabilize mood swings at least as often as it exacerbates them

This is true. Also, there is zero statistical correlation between BC pill usage and weight gain. My last employer was a CRO specializing in reproductive health trials, so I've read way more literature on this than is seemly.

horizontal rule
51

48 and 50: When my sister took it, it made her really irritable and moody.

horizontal rule
52

A very good friend of mine fit the profile of Beck and her friend: was proscribed the Pill at around 14

If she was proscribed it, doesn't that mean she was forbidden to take it? /wolfson

I think Ogged just linked to my post to out me as part of the Not Getting Any club to all of Unfogged so he wouldn't feel so alone.

You could probably find some Unfoggeder willing to help you with that.

horizontal rule
53

48, 50, 51: I think it has a "whacking the TV set effect" on mood swings. Might cause them, might cure them, might have no effect one way or the other, all depending on your individual biochemistry. It's the sort of thing that's worth trying if you're prepared to get right back off if the Pill is making things worse instead of better.

horizontal rule
54

51: See 41.

There's really no predicting its effect on any individual until she guinea pigs it. And, as LB says, different formulations can have wildly different effects on mood.

horizontal rule
55

You could probably find some Unfoggeder willing to help you with that.

Gee Frederick, that's a pretty funny joke. It's a wonder no one else thought of it anywhere in the preceding 24 comments.

horizontal rule
56

I'll see your 41 and raise you 55.

horizontal rule
57

damn you urple.

horizontal rule
58

As I have a family history of psychosis, I am nervous about mucking with my moods.

horizontal rule
59

Understandable.

horizontal rule
60

there is zero statistical correlation between BC pill usage and weight gain

And I was all set to blame the fact that I didn't fit into my dresses on my birth control. Damn you, apostropher. Damn you to hell. Where, if I lose weight and dye my hair [okay, also damn google for not indexing the most recent threads; I want to link to where LB called me not a blonde], you will have to answer to me.

horizontal rule
61

Bostoniangirl - If you mean psychosis in the clinical sense, I don't think the pill carries much risk of that. (Although I'm no doctor). If you just mean plain ole' layman's crazy, well isn't that more or less the same thing as wild mood swings, which you say you already have?

(Not that I'm encouraging you to take the pill or anything.)

horizontal rule
62

Urple-- I believe that my mother's diagnosis is schizoaffective disorder--manic depressive illness with schizophrenic-like symptoms. I believe she spoke in tongues when she was 16, but I've known her to be terribly agitated and to stay up all night. And once she thought she was urgently expected at a presidential inauguration--that's when a hospital called my Dad.

horizontal rule
63

Okay that sounds like the clinical sort of crazy. I don't think taking the pill will affect your odds of ending up speaking in tongues or anything. But I could be wrong.

horizontal rule
64

can I redirect your attention, urple? Should I or shouldn't I undergo an elective kidney operation?

horizontal rule
65

I'm bipolar, and after years of the pill making me almost unsleepwithably irritable, the NuvaRing is perfect, and if that were to stop, it could be out of my system in no time at all. Of course, the one complication would be if gets a little bit dislodged and someone thinks it's a diaphragm and concludes that you've orchestrated something that you absolutely did not orchestrate, but that would never happen. Especially not this past summer.

horizontal rule
66

I'm just saying I've read the warning labels in pills packs before, and I've never seen "may begin speaking in tongues" listed as risk factor.

horizontal rule
67

I don't follow the mixup. Even if, as didn't happen, someone thought the ring was a diapraghm, they're both methods of BC. What was the difference?

horizontal rule
68

well then perhaps you'll write me a prescription for some of these birth control pills. Can I get one with echinacea?

horizontal rule
69

text, I love you, but I don't get the comment.

Birth Control pill also doubles the concentration of a certain anticonvulsant with antidepressant properties.

Rose, Thanks for delurking, and I'd love to know the answer to LB's question.

Also, what are the relative merits of the ring versus an IUD?

horizontal rule
70

See my 18 for an IUD disadvantage. I don't know anything about the ring either way.

horizontal rule
71

68 was to 66. I was sort of being a bastard to urple.

horizontal rule
72

IUD isn't hormonal. No lag time upon removal for restoring fertility. Ring has to be replaced regularly, while you just forget about the IUD.

LB is right - some women experience much heavier periods with the IUD, especially in the first few months after insertion.

horizontal rule
73

If someone would only develop a cock ring.

(Trying to fill the gap, what with apostropher bringing the knowledge)

horizontal rule
74

Some people have cock rings, but I think it's more of a barrier method.

I've heard that some IUDs are infused with hormones (progesterone?)

My wife was on the pill in HS because she really did have messed up periods (had to go home some bad days), she was regular on it, but then when she stopped it was even worse than before- had to have periods induced every few months because they didn't occur naturally for a year.

I think the pill decreases libido because ovulation is known to increase libido. No ovulation, no want sex.

horizontal rule
75

I thought you still ovulated on the pill, just at a predictable time (not that this is something I have any shred of authority on)

horizontal rule
76

Nope. At least the goal is to prevent ovulation, although it, like everything else in life, may work imperfectly.

horizontal rule
77

It's main function is to prevent ovulation, and in the rare cases where it fails, it can prevent implantation of a fertilized egg. That's why the wingnuts call it an "abortifacient", because there's a slight chance you could block a fertilized egg. Never mind that medical pregnancy is defined as post-implantation.

horizontal rule
78

Its- damn it, I'm usually really good at that.

horizontal rule
79

Wait, then what's the deal with those different color pills that you take for one week each month? An old girlfriend said something about how some of them were essentially placebos. Or maybe that was just her brand.

horizontal rule
80

That's why the wingnuts call it an "abortifacient", because there's a slight chance you could block a fertilized egg.

To expand on this, I believe that the 'fertilized egg-blocking' effect is speculative. That is, the primary mechanism of the Pill is ovulation-blocking; it is possible, when that fails, to get pregnant while taking the Pill; and a significant percentage (40%, half?) of all fertilized eggs fail to implant. To my knowledge, there isn't medical data establishing that the Pill reduces the odds that a fertilized egg will implant if ovulation and fertilization take place.

It's possible, but not established. But it's a lot easier to whip up opposition to 'abortifacients' than to straight BC, so it's a politically productive area of speculation for BC opponents.

horizontal rule
81

One week's worth is placebos -- it's so that you'll have a period. There's no medical reason why you should want to, but it reassures people.

horizontal rule
82

Ah, ok. I now understand. Thanks.

horizontal rule
83

Rose, come back and answer LizardBreath's question!!!

(Let's see if that works.)

horizontal rule
84

81: And strictly speaking I don't think it's really a period. I've heard that some people are starting to skip the placebo bit to suppress the period part entirely.

horizontal rule
85

I think rose's point in 65 is that the NuvaRing looks kinda, sorta, like a diaphragm with a big ol' hole in the middle of it.

Indeed, there is sometimes a chance that it might become dislodged and fall out during sex, but that's when you can go for extra points in well, call it the ring toss.

horizontal rule
86

There was a New Yorker article about 6 years ago about some doctor who studied periods. He said the whole placebo set, making you get your period exactly every 28 days, is BS and is based on 60s views of male doctors that women want to have their period and be "regular". He said there's no reason not to keep taking the active pills for several months and only get your period three or four times a year (less frequent than that and you can have breakthrough bleeding.) I thinks that's the idea behind the new Seasonale pill I've seen commercials for.

horizontal rule
87

I think guys in relationships should have to eat the placebos as a token reminder of their ladies' regimens. Also, woo sugar hook 'em!

horizontal rule
88

67, 65: My speculation would be that what didn't happen is that someone didn't think that she orchestrated the sexual encounter, because they didn't think that she had deployed her diaphragm in before meeting for the evening or whatever.

horizontal rule
89

Does anyone know why placebos are (typically? always?) sugar pills, as opposed to, say, corn starch pills, or some other harmless powder?

horizontal rule
90

88: Oh, that's much more likely.

horizontal rule
91

85: Didn't we all have a talk recently about euphemisms? Does "the ring toss" mean that if the ring is dislodged you'll get preggers?

horizontal rule
92

I would guess not -- it's not a barrier method, and assuming it was replaced reasonably quickly (like an hour or so) I'd doubt hormone levels would drop all that fast. But I don't know.

horizontal rule
93

No, even if the ring comes out for a few minutes, you're still protected. (Or so my wife assures me.)

I just mean, if you (meaning me) can get the ring around your (meaning my) member, it feels like an accomplishment. A carnival-game accomplishment, but still.

horizontal rule
94

I think they have to dissolve like the drug, or you could tell the differenece, and starch won't dissolve, it will just make oobleck. At least, that's for blinded drug studies- I guess it doesn't matter for birth control pills.

horizontal rule
95

88--Okay, I get it now. Now that I've parsed all your negatives, that is.

horizontal rule
96

67 & 69 -

Diaphragms, if I've got this right, must be inserted up to 2 hours before sex, but the Ring is left in for 3 weeks at a stretch.

Many women can't use IUD's, and the Ring is malleable and, it must be said, does not resemble a lure. Really, I can't recommend it highly enough.

horizontal rule
97

95: I felt weird about making up speculation about others' sex life without trying to be funny.

If you look up 'placebo' here, sugar pills don't actually contain sugar anymore.

horizontal rule
98

Oh well- I was just trying to work the term oobleck into a thread about birth control.

horizontal rule
99

The concept of wanting to have a period is totally foreign to me. I guess I'm just old-fashioned and misogynist.

horizontal rule
100

Late, but to the original question, I'm on the pill, and all of my friends are either on it, or some other form of hormonal bc (patch and the NuvaRing). Seems to be the thing to do these days. I love the pill - I don't really have any side effects, just the benefits, although I was on one for a month that had a higher dose of estrogen and it was Fucked. Up. I got off that quick.

What makes me sad is that they keep lowering and lowering the amount of hormones needed to be effective, and that all the women in years past have been taking way more hormones than necessary. Sucks.

horizontal rule
101

Thanks, LB and Matt#3. (Obviously, if I do go that route, I'll double-check your info with a professional, not that that's personal or anything.)

horizontal rule
102

... they didn't think that she had deployed her diaphragm in before meetin ...

Or there was a coment along the lines of "wattinhell!? You call this protected? You cut a big ol' hole in the middle of your diaphragm. What kind of fruitloop are you?"

horizontal rule
103

On pill, but only because you can't get Norplant any more. I heart Norplant. (And yes, I realize that "you can't get it" is hyperbole; nonetheless, it's not as available as it used to be, and my fucking health insurance won't cover it. OR an IUD.)

Estrogen, bless it, gives me migraines: so mini-pill it is. Which is a pain, b/c I'm bad at taking pills and it should be taken at the same time daily to ensure maximum protection. Oh well, some day I'll turn up pregnant, I guess.

Most women of childbearing age are on the pill b/c (1) it's more reliable and convenient than barrier methods; (2) it's more often covered by insurance than IUDs or Norplant or other alternative hormonel delivery methods; (3) getting pregnant sucks.

Here's what I don't get, though. Every woman I know agrees with LB: when they develop a pill for men, that's nice honey, but I'm not likely to stop taking mine unless I'm in a long-term monogamous relationship and I trust the hell out of my partner to remember to take 'em.

So why the hell do men just leave b/c to women? Obviously, the immediate fear of getting pregnant isn't as intense. But seriously, men in the room: if you don't want to cause a pregnancy, do you assume your partner's on the pill; ask, and then take her word for it/assume she doesn't forget; or insist on using the only method available to you, i.e. condoms?

horizontal rule
104

Oh, and on the subject of skipping your periods, check out The Well-Timed Period. Great blog on repro health issues, written by an ob/gyn.

horizontal rule
105

Is it just me? Or did anyone else read ogged's original post as saying: "The pill lowers women's libidos? No wonder those twenty- and thirty-somethings don't want to have sex with me"?

I'm just saying...

horizontal rule
106

When I was single and in the beginning stages of sexual relationships, it was condoms at all times, period. I think at least one or two of those relationships ended up being a condoms+pill situation.

It wasn't until I was in a trusted, monogamous, and STD-tested relationship that I felt comfortable "leaving the birth control" to her, but I assured her (and I assure you now) that I felt the requisite amount of guilt along with my relief.

horizontal rule
107

Wow, that's some bold delurking.

horizontal rule
108

So why the hell do men just leave b/c to women?

What? I'm pretty sure condoms are the most widely used contraceptive in America.

horizontal rule
109

I think it's pretty much understood that you're wearing a condom unless you're in a relationship (with that person).

Unless you happen to be stuck in an elevator or something.

horizontal rule
110

Well, they are, but I thought that in general that was b/c of disease control, not birth control. If I'm wrong, I feel sure you guys will tell me.

horizontal rule
111

The thing is, they perform both functions when they don't break.

horizontal rule
112

I seem to recall being equally freaked out at the possibilities of unwanted pregnancy and disease, and trusting St. Trojan to keep me safe from both.

I don't recall ever making the distinction. Data point of one.

horizontal rule
113

I mean, I guess I'm more concerned about the disease, but mostly because the woman says she is on the pill, and I believe her. But also, I know that if she's lying, there's the condom.

But I see where you're going: I have no reason to think a woman would lie about being on the pill, whereas you would suspect a man might like about the mill. It's because we're assholes.

horizontal rule
114

No, it wouldn't even be b/c I think a guy would *lie* as that, having occasionally forgotten a pill myself, I simply do not trust even the most trustworthy person with something that's as important to me as not getting knocked up.

horizontal rule
115

that is, he'd lie about it. And presumably would like doing so. Like an asshole.

horizontal rule
116

you can imagine a fellow (or I can) who would lie, whereas I really can't imagine a woman who would, or at least I don't have the danger of encountering one, since I don't play in the NBA.

horizontal rule
117

I don't think it's so much lie flat out, but just gloss over certain truths. Like, say, for example, say "yeah, I'm on the mill" but not mention the fact that he forgot to take it two days in a row last week. Oops.

horizontal rule
118

I know women who have lied about b/c and gotten pregnant on purpose, yes I do.

But see, that's the thing: why can we imagine a guy lying about that stuff? What guy in his right mind wants to get someone knocked up? Jesus.

horizontal rule
119

No guy in his right mind! But at that point, no guy's in his right mind?

horizontal rule
120

it probably comes down to the assumption that men just want to fuck fuck fuck, which is a problematic assumption. Because probably untrue, and certainly harmful.

horizontal rule
121

Well, not all men, all the time, but as 'Smasher points out, sometimes a man's rational decision making powers aren't really being brought into play.

horizontal rule
122

Or that women don't really want it -- that they can't be out of their right mind in a similar way at a similar moment. Not that I would claim to speak for the la-deez, but the consensus around seems to be that women can want sex just as much as men.

horizontal rule
123

Right, but a woman's always are.

Am I the only one here who is having a problem with the logic?

horizontal rule
124

Matt, I'm pretty sure in context it should be spelled "lay-deez."

horizontal rule
125

Oh, no no no, I was describing a position, not advocating it.

But surely, the negative consequences of pregnancy fall more heavily on the woman than on the man.

horizontal rule
126

jinx!

horizontal rule
127

#125, I know: but it's the position itself that I don't get. Yes, being pregnant is worse than being the cause of a pregnancy; but assuming that most men do *not* want to hear "honey, we need to talk," I just don't understand how that "heat of the moment" thing gets any play at all.

horizontal rule
128

B, are you trying to bait someone into making a claim about the balance of responsibility for a pregnancy? I don't really get your line of questioning—we all agree that it's illogical to trust a new sexual partner's word about their contraceptive precautions/bill of sexual health. So, what logic?

horizontal rule
129

But see, that's the thing: why can we imagine a guy lying about that stuff? What guy in his right mind wants to get someone knocked up? Jesus.

'why can't'? *I* can. People lie about all sorts of stupid shit, male and female alike.

I simply do not trust even the most trustworthy person with something that's as important to me as not getting knocked up.

Ayup. It's a sucker bet.

Cala: My friends joke that the Pill works by making you uninterested in sex; see, perfect contraception!

If so, I wonder what effect the pill has had on the divorce rate. Unintended social engineering 101!

I'm just saying I've read the warning labels in pills packs before, and I've never seen "may begin speaking in tongues" listed as risk factor.

"Always consult your doctor when taking any medication."

The phrase of the day is: "transient psychosis". Learn it, love it, don't live it.

ash

['Also: "cascading fault".']

horizontal rule
130

127: Ah.. the hypothetical I was considering wasn't so much "Honey," as "Random girl I met in a bar."

horizontal rule
131

"Am I the only one here who is having a problem with the logic?"

I think we all have problems with the logic. But that way of thinking probably accounts for the differences you've brought up.

horizontal rule
132

I just don't understand how that "heat of the moment" thing gets any play at all.

Because people are willing to trade long-term sensibility for immediate gratification. That's the explanation for any partner who doesn't insist on a condom the first time (and second, and so on, until intimacy or what have you).

horizontal rule
133

#128: No. I was asking an honest question; in my experience, even very intelligent men are willing to forego condoms with long-term partners on the assumption that said partners will take care of birth control. And given LB's point--which I agree with, and which most women I know agree with--that a male pill is greatly needed and will be welcomed, but that I am not going to stop taking mine--I figured I'd ask.

horizontal rule
134

It's because we're assholes. Either because we only want to fuck, or because we're willing to think that we only want to fuck, when that isn't actually the case.

horizontal rule
135

See, I think my question is more charitable towards men than the "we're assholes" answer, but, hey.

horizontal rule
136

no, I don't think your question is uncharitable. but that's my answer. and I think I got it right. That is, 134 gets it exactly right.

horizontal rule
137

I know I'm an outlier, but this seems somehow silly - or else I'm missing the operational definition of 'long-term partner".

I trust my long-term partner with a comprehensive Power of Attorney, and signature power over all my financial affairs. I'm willing to trust that she's not going to sell my house, clean out all my accounts, and run off to the South Pacific. I should worry that she might do all that and get pregnant, too?

horizontal rule
138

I'd say (once you're in the 'past a condom' stage of a relationship) that men are more willing to trust women with BC because the immediate stakes are higher. I mean, as big a deal as getting someone else pregnant is, it's not the same as getting pregnant.

I'm not the world's most organized person, and part of the reason I'm using an IUD now is that while the pill worked fine for me before I had kids and a demanding job, after my second kid was born I had months where I'd missed four or five pills. A couple of months like that, and I figured I was going to have three kids if I didn't do something about it, and went and got myself an IUD. At my level of flakiness, if I were taking the pill to keep from getting someone else pregnant rather than getting myself pregnant, I might easily have not gotten worried enough to take action for quite a bit longer. If you see what I mean.

I wouldn't trust myself with BC if it wasn't my own ass on the line.

horizontal rule
139

I would trust my partner with all those things too--because they're conscious decisions. Whereas even if one consciously decides to use birth control, it's possible to forget a pill. I've done it. I would worry about someone else doing it.

horizontal rule
140

If it's your ass on the line, you probably don't have to worry about the birth control.

sorry.

horizontal rule
141

We were planning to have a lawyer.

horizontal rule
142

I know women who have lied about b/c and gotten pregnant on purpose, yes I do.

The Illinois Appellate Court decided a bizarre case last year. A woman had been in a sexual relationship with a doc. According to him, it was Clintonesque: blowjobs, no intercourse. The guy no doubt thought that this was a reliable method of birth control. However, post-ejaculation, the wench (mean, sexist term, but justified if the guy is telling the truth) went into the bathroom and, unknown to the guy, apparently stored his semen, which she later injected into herself. She got pregnant, had his kid, and sued him for child support!! The court held that he had to pay.

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20050309.html

But see, that's the thing: why can we imagine a guy lying about that stuff? What guy in his right mind wants to get someone knocked up?

Hey, on "Desperate Housewives," Carlos took his wife's bcp's and replaced them with placebos so she'd get knocked up. If there are women who want to get knocked up, against the guy's wishes, and are willing to mislead the guy to do so, presumably there are some guys who would do the same thing. (I trust you're not suggesting that guys are morally superior to those conniving women. :-) ) Maybe the guy really wants to have a kid with her before she's too old (a la Carlos), or figures "I want to marry her, she's not willing yet, but if she gets pregnant then she'll marry me."

horizontal rule
143

nice

horizontal rule
144

I mean, as big a deal as getting someone else pregnant is, it's not the same as getting pregnant.

I think that's all of it, tbh. I think 'Don't get pregnant' is beat into women's heads more than 'Don't get a girl pregnant' is for men. Plus, the risks aren't equal.

If I get pregnant, I probably have to take time off of school, bear the physical risk, social stigma of being an unwed mother, etc. The guy that gets me pregnant? Assuming he's decent and sticks around, doesn't have to take time out of his life, doesn't have to be pregnant, less social stigma because he's not the one walking around being pregnant. If he's not decent, he probably won't even have to pay child support.

I would be more affected by a unplanned pregnancy than he would; I have more incentive to be cautious. I think it doesn't even require guys being assholes, they're just not as sensitive to the risks because the risks aren't as serious for them.

horizontal rule
145

Yeah, I think the "it gets beat into women's heads" thing is *key.* And I hate that. I can't say this for certain, not being a guy, but it seems to me that if I were a decent guy (as most men are) that getting someone else pregnant would make me feel worse than actually getting pregnant myself. I mean, if I get knocked up by accident, I have to deal with the consequences, and they might suck, but at least the choice is mine to make. If I knock someone else up, I not only have to deal with the guilt about that, but also the powerlessness of not being able to fix it myself, and the ensuing guilt about forcing someone I love to deal with a lot of bullshit, you know?

horizontal rule
146

Re: unequal consequences -- at the coed Catholic high school in my hometown, if a girl became pregnant, she was expelled. The father? Was banned from extracurricular activities for a semester.

(This was in the mid-90s. I don't know what the policy is now.)

horizontal rule
147

From Frederick's link:

Irons disputes Phillips's claims and asserts that she conceived her child in the ordinary way. For purposes of this column only, however, I will assume the truth of Philips's allegations.
In other words, more evidence for my general principle of not having any sort of sex with anyone I think is unsound and not having non-condom sex with anyone I don't trust a whole helluva lot over a nice long time period.

That said, there seems to be a backlash brewing over enforcement of paternity responsibility. I'm still pretty much in the "Suck it up, men!" column, but I'm starting to get a little worried about how the laws are written and enforced. An Irish gay friend of mine backed out of donating sperm to a good friend of his because the EU has recently decided to overrule private contracts absolving sperm donors of fiscal responsibility. I haven't quite moved out of the Suck It Up column, but men might deserve some legal clarity here.

horizontal rule
148

Oh yeah, at my Catholic h.s. a pregnant girl was expelled; nothing at all happened to the father. That was in the 80s, so I guess Becks' story demonstrates "progress."

horizontal rule
149

I figure the guy, if he were to think about it at all, probably figures that however worried he is about the possibility of pregnancy, she's more worried.

If he's a decent guy, he'll feel bad, but that's nothing near something sitting on your bladder kicking you while causing sciatica for nine months. If there were a perfect child support system that was seriously compromising to the guy's career, they'd be more worried.

Plus, condoms suck.

horizontal rule
150

I think that paternity enforcement and fiscal responsibility stuff is really just about absolving the state of the responsibility for supporting single moms, frankly. The backlash bothers me, because you end up with idiots like Tierney arguing that if men have to pay child support, they should have veto power over abortions, rather than focusing on the fact that it isn't the woman, but the state, that demands and enforces child support from a kid's father. (Which, according to every single mom I know, sucks ass, because it makes you dependent on a resentful guy.)

horizontal rule
151

All this said, though, given a hypothetical alternative between girls/women holding all the b.c. knowledge/cards/responsibility and keeping that information from them (realistically, what it would be), I'd rather have the girls in charge.

Young girl at my old high school tearfully confiding to my sister: How do you know if he used a condom?

horizontal rule
152

it seems to me that if I were a decent guy (as most men are) that getting someone else pregnant would make me feel worse than actually getting pregnant myself.

Eh, I'm a decent person, or at least not so much of a moral leper, and I don't think I would. I would feel guiltier about getting someone else pregnant -- more like a bad person -- but if I were making the decision on a totally selfish basis, whether I would rather have an unwanted pregnancy or be responsible for getting someone else pregnant, I know which one of those sounds to me like the easier way out. To be overly clever, avoiding pregnancy is a much more visceral motivation than avoiding a pregnancy for which one is responsible.

horizontal rule
153

Also, I'd like to say that despite all of the arguments we get into about men, women, and gender-correctness (see teh gay discussion for example) that I've been impressed by the men on this thread. I figured in 150+ comments there would have been at least some level of "um, we've got a good thing here - don't ruin it for us" backlash to my anti-Pill post but so far, none. Well played, guys.

horizontal rule
154

153: for most of the guys here, it isn't an issue, so.

horizontal rule
155

#152: Oh, I agree in terms of visceral motivation, and I agree that in terms of actually feeling a compulsion to take b.c., selfishness is a better motivation than selflessness. I'm just flogging a hobbyhorse about the fact that we tend to talk about unwanted pregnancies as if men aren't concerned about them (unless they're opposed to abortion), instead of talking about men's role in unwanted pregnancies as an awful thing--not because of the threat of child support payments, but because it involves creating a problem you can't fix, and then having to watch someone you care about fix it on their own.

This is partly my whole "mother of a son" thing, by the way, and the line I plan to take when talking to him about birth control, responsibility, etc.

horizontal rule
156

I agree with 150, but I also think that the state around here also wants to avoid any responsibility for making abortion seem so utterly taboo.

horizontal rule
157

Smart line to take, I think, BPhD. (And your son is adorable.)

To clarify, I wasn't suggesting that child support should be increased/tightened/whatever to get men to be more responsible about b.c.; could have made the point by saying 'if we required them to quit school, their sports teams, and wear a pregnancy suit and then we kicked them a lot in nine months...'

Anyhow. Do diaphragms work well?

horizontal rule
158

As I said on Beck's blog, Newt's a month older than we were planning on. We had decided that we were going to stop using the diaphragm the next month, but by that time I was knocked up.

So, personally I consider them unreliable. But I understand it works great for lots of people.

horizontal rule
159

I found diaphragms reliable, but I hate barrier methods. Inconvenience ticks me off.

You know what's great, though, if you want a barrier method, is a condom plus this stuff called "Vaginal Contraceptive Film." Yes, it's buy the same idiots that bring us "Vaginal Cleaning Film," but I'm not going to be a boycott purist when a convenient b.c. method is available. VCF is about 2 inches square, and it's kind of like rice paper (a little thicker): spermicide suspended in a gelatinous film. Fold it up, whack it in, and with a condom, you're good to go. A lot more portable and convenient than a diaphragm.

horizontal rule
160

Oh, and Cala, I didn't think *you* were supporting the child support backlash (esp. as you said so directly).

horizontal rule
161

I figured in 150+ comments there would have been at least some level of "um, we've got a good thing here - don't ruin it for us" backlash to my anti-Pill post but so far, none.

My girlfriend has problems in this area (rather a few). I dunno, if the shit doesn't work right, there's no real benefit to it unless you're involved wholly in one-night stands.

Prof. B:No. I was asking an honest question;

Ok, obviously, I have a far more dire and cynical view of humanity, bless their black flabby little hearts. (I didn't say I didn't like 'em; I don't particularly trust them.)

in my experience, even very intelligent men are willing to forego condoms with long-term partners on the assumption that said partners will take care of birth control.

In an ideal situation, probably not. In an unideal situation (booze, drugs, rampant horniness, brain farts, lack of condoms, bad condoms, etc.) that may not matter so much.

And given LB's point--which I agree with, and which most women I know agree with--that a male pill is greatly needed and will be welcomed,

I think they ought to have one, but I suspect it wouldn't sell very well unless it was half Viagra. Taking pill to avoid getting pregnant: deeply needed protection making one feel safe. Taking a pill to avoid getting someone else pregnant: onerous burden assumed to get what you want. Workable in a high trust, monogamous situation, much more difficult in a random encounter situation.

I'm with Armsmasher: the incentives are wrong.

but that I am not going to stop taking mine--I figured I'd ask.

Absolutely.

Yeah, I think the "it gets beat into women's heads" thing is *key.*

No doubt. It's obnoxious. Neccessary but obnoxious.

If I knock someone else up, I not only have to deal with the guilt about that, but also the powerlessness of not being able to fix it myself, and the ensuing guilt about forcing someone I love to deal with a lot of bullshit, you know?

(Might as well paint a target on my ass) I did that once. Signal wires were crossed. Nonetheless, entirely my fault. I felt the way you described, but that was AFTERWARDS. The trick is, of course, to feel that way BEFOREHAND. Which is more of a difficult project than it seems when seen from a remove, simply because the gonads and the brain are trying to obey that old biological imperative.

Hey, house wiring is really quick and easy if you ignore the possibility of getting zapped!

ash

['I did THAT once too!']

horizontal rule
162

Since I went to a Catholic school, along with the normal contraception stuff that they taught in health class (despite it being against the rules), they also taught Fertility Awareness. Not your mother's rhythm method, but how to read the signs your body gives off that indicate when you're ovulating. I'd never rely on it alone, but I think a lot of people are too quick to dismiss its usefulness for letting people know when to be extra careful or just being in touch with your body.

horizontal rule
163

Going way back to #99:

The concept of wanting to have a period is totally foreign to me. I guess I'm just old-fashioned and misogynist.

It depends on what you mean by want. I don't think many women do want a period in some kind of affirmation of their womanhood (although I know that some women do). Many women want to have them because it's a pretty damn reliable indicator that they aren't pregnant. If you keep taking your Pills, the only proof you get is negative "I think I've been reliably taking it." A period is more solid evidence. So it's more in the realm of unpleasant but serving some greater purpose than being a good thing in and of itself.

Having never been pregnant, I'm sympathetic to this. I don't know what my body's symptoms of early pregnancy would be like (especially with the Pill masking them), so buried way back in my mind is the fear that if I skip periods with the Pill, I'll end up realising I'm pregnant comparitively late in the pregnancy. It's something that's good to know as soon as possible and missing a period is one of the best early signs.

horizontal rule
164

If you find yourself eating a lot of peanut butter sandwiches, take a pregnancy test, is my advice.

Also if you keep feeling PMSish, but the damn thing won't show up.

horizontal rule
165

I always knew when I woke up thinking "Hmm. Better go buy a pregnancy test." No idea what the tip-off was, but it was entirely obvious somehow.

horizontal rule
166

Really? God, I'm the queen of taking pregnancy tests all the time, b/c the *possibility* that I could be pregnant just freaks me out so much.

Ironically the one time I *was* pregnant, it didn't occur to me for weeks.

horizontal rule
167

A male friend of mine was raped by a woman trying to impregnate herself in order to entrap him into staying with her (he was planning to move out). She woke him up from a nap with a blow job, which he consented to, but then got on top of him. He said "no, wait, I'll get a condom" several times, but she outweighed him considerably and one arm of his was pinned against the couch. She did become pregnant, although I think there's some ambiguity as to whether the pregnancy was from this incident, another time when they had unprotected sex during her period, or maybe weirdly the condom, despite not breaking, had leaked some sperm. His (well, presumably, don't think there's ever been a test) son was born, he went to see him and the mother in the hospital, and she threatened to kill him. The mother hasn't sued for child support and he hasn't paid any.

horizontal rule
168

Very few guys are able to provide even minimally decent support for more than one family (with kids) at a time. Someone always gets shorted.

What that means is that a non-wealthy guy can do right by two families in his life, if he marries young. Even that would entail dumping his wife when she was about 40.

But I've seen guys who've taken three or four tries at it. It ends up being pretty miserable -- if the child support is paid, the new family suffers, and the old family doesn't necessarily do well either.

It makes me sound like a terrible Puritan, but people should realize that the second chance isn't as good as the first, and in some cases, that they really shouldn't try again.

horizontal rule
169

I think you'll find a lot of sympathy for a position saying that people should be very, very careful about choosing to have kids, and and about how they plan to support them. At least, I've got a lot of sympathy for such a position.

Reckless hedonism is great so long as it doesn't involve screwing over your kids.

horizontal rule
170

169 What, like on a big family bunkbed? I agree in such an arrangement the kids should take the top bunk.

horizontal rule
171

Spoken like a man whose kid rarely wakes up vomiting.

horizontal rule
172

This is slowing down. Suggested follow up: "Wait, are most twenty- and thirty-something women in our social circle on anti-depressants?"

Or else, an ever-popular age-of-consent-and-bestiality thread.

horizontal rule
173

Involving the proper calculation of the age of consent in dog years.

horizontal rule
174

2.28 in some states, 2.57 in others.

horizontal rule
175

Ironically, at the time this drama was unfolding (167), my friend was playing the son in _An Inspector Calls_, a great melodrama (Edwardian maybe) a play in which every member of a family bears some portion of the responsibility for a young woman's death, and the son's contribution was getting her pregnant.

horizontal rule
176

You know, this thread, it kind of irritates me. Did I not call in 128 that we were looking at a referendum on paternal responsibility? I was raised pretty far from the ivory towers of the east coast and was instructed from the get-go that any pregnancy resulting from my foolishness would absolutely be my responsibility if I intended to be a member of my family in good standing. The "backlash against child support"? It can't be a view held by many more than makes up the bloc of men who systematically oppose women's rights—a bloc, surely, that accounts for an historically small percentage of men today.

Sure, we paranoid protofathers don't deserve congratulations for it, but please don't doubt the very real, fundamental terror we feel toward pregnancy or the sense that we are absolutely required to do the right thing that's at the source of that terror.

horizontal rule
177

I guess "backlash" was the wrong word, describing as it does the creepy "fathers' rights" camp. I do think that the "right of the child" to have and know about his or her parent(s), genetic and legal, is going to get a little confusing going forward. I'm pretty much solidly in the camp of everyone commenting here in favor of responsibility--and yes, terror. What I'm interested in, more, is what the responsibility should be of donors, surrogates, and people who give their children up for adoption. These are issues in family law that seem to me far from settled.

horizontal rule
178

Not doubting it -- as one of those saying that women have a greater fear of unwanted pregnancy than men, I'm really relying on my use of the word 'visceral'. The 'responsibility for an unplanned child' element of fear is equal, but the 'Oh my god, there's something alive in my abdomen that isn't me,' is all on the woman. Further, that extra burden is strongly frontloaded -- it kicks in the minute you know you're pregnant -- which makes it, I think, more motivating than the perhaps more significant worry over the long haul of how to pay for college.

Additionally, no one's mentioned the elephant in the room - abortion. In the social milieu to which most commenters here belong, odds are an unwanted pregnancy would be aborted. (I'm guessing that, but I'm pretty sure. It's what I did when I got pregnant the month after Mr. Breath and I started having sex. (Broken condom, waiting for my period so that I could go on the pill)).

Abortion is a two-edged sword, perceived burden-wise. It's thought of as at best, a morally ambiguous decision by even many (most?) pro-choice people, and it's the woman's decision. So in a pro-choice but morally conflicted couple, which describes a heck of a lot of people, the woman knows that if she gets pregnant, she is going to have to decide whether or not to do something that she, or other people whose opinion she values, regards as a bad thing. The man doesn't have to worry about taking responsibility for that decision -- he just has to lay back and be supportive.

None of this is intended to say that most men are lacking in responsibility, just that in the factual situation as it stands, women have a significantly greater incentive to avoid pregnancy.

horizontal rule
179

And no one's mentioned the morning-after-pill.

horizontal rule
180

Yo, yo, yo! I mentioned abortion!

horizontal rule
181

Damn. Should have reread the thread before making assertions.

horizontal rule
182

I heart the morning after pill. A pox upon the houses of all those who would prevent it from being sold over-the-counter. I (well, my mom) once paid 400 dollars in Emergency Room fees in college when I didn't know where else to go to get an Rx. I was insured, but my insurance didn't cover birth control, and my normal health care provider was the school health center, which was closed during the summer even though there were some students living there. Though it would have covered an abortion. Guess I should have waited and seen. Still today, morning after pill doctors' visits take hours out of my life, though now I know better than to go to the ER, and go to community health centers.

horizontal rule
183

There's something that really, really, really needs to go OTC.

(I am an idiot, of course. Back in 1995, while I had heard of the morning after pill, it wasn't so much a matter of public discussion, and I literally didn't think of it untill I'd missed the window.)

horizontal rule
184

They've gotten a lot better in the past few years. In college, the morning after pill gave me violent nausea and borderline frightening quantities of menstrual bleeding. Now it's just fine.

horizontal rule
185

No doubt, LB, a man can't share the burden of gestation even as he shares the concerns associated with parenting. But as to the latter, I think that in one sense even the irritating and misguided "father's rights" camp reveals a greater universal sense of paternal responsibility among men. (Even if father's righters' goal is to exercise control over women, they still couch their goals in a language that they assume will be met by a sympathetic audience: in terms of paternal responsibility.)

horizontal rule
186

Gynos should totally be offering prescriptions for the MA pill as a standard option during checkups. (Maybe they do -- mine doesn't, but of course she knows I'm using an IUD.)

horizontal rule
187

184--That's interesting to know. I took it once, in 1997, and had a horrible experience. The seeming contempt expressed by the good people at Planned Parenthood didn't help, either.

horizontal rule
188

Hear, hear. Having been in the situation of needing (well, my girlfriend needing) emergency contraception, I shudder to think of the drama and potential trauma that would have resulted had she not been able to get it.

horizontal rule
189

But as to the latter, I think that in one sense even the irritating and misguided "father's rights" camp reveals a greater universal sense of paternal responsibility among men.

I'm not disagreeing with you, but I don't get you here -- greater than what? Than there used to be? I would say that there needs to be some serious shakeup, not so much in law but in practices, in family law relating to children of unmarried or no longer married parents. It should be strongly understood that both parents are totally responsible for all of their children, and that that responsibility should be expressed in both financial support and personal contact and caretaking. The vestiges of the "Women care for children; men pay child support" system suck for everyone.

horizontal rule
190

so here's my question: with the risk of failure of condoms, but the near perfect success of the pill, why not do both? It's bayesian probability, and it reduces the chances to nil. I guess the con is teh sex isn't as great for the guy, but if you really don't want to risk the burden of fatherhood (or motherhood), why wouldn't you suffer that?

horizontal rule
191

184: My famously horrible college health center was pretty bad for that, too. My nurse clucked when she counted the days from my last period, "Right at your most fertile time," with a disapproving look and in a tone that I felt pretty clearly expressed that I was slutty and irresponsible.

horizontal rule
192

I guess the con is teh sex isn't as great for the guy

Or the gal.

horizontal rule
193

190: Some women get negative health/emotional effects from the pill. Even for those of us who don't, there's a tendency to go off it during long dry spells (have I ever told you guys I was in the Peace Corps?), and you can't go back on it until immediately after your period.

So, yes, doubling up on BC is always a good idea, but there are reasons for a fair amount of condom-only sex.

horizontal rule
194

192: Mmhm.

horizontal rule
195

192/194: color me innocent.

horizontal rule
196

Some men really, really have a hard time with condoms. Like, very rarely can they come. It's not an excuse for condomless sex with a new partner, but it's motivation to get rid of the condoms as soon as the trust is there.

horizontal rule
197

Any thoughts on polyurethane v. latex? I hate them both, but the former significantly less.

horizontal rule
198

Not only do I not disagree with you, I emphatically agree. And I think outside the vocal minority of scum (the backlash against child support), so do most men nowadays. Admittedly, I'm young and childless and hang out with lots of young, childless, even childish dudes, but I think that we were all at the very least raised with a different understanding than the "women care for children, men pay child support" paradigm.

I don't think it's a lack of paternal responsibility that explains the shortcomings of family law, but instead a perfect storm of structural factors: laws written by an older generation who grew up in an economy with drastically different gender expectations, previously unreliable methods for establishing paternity inexpensively and without a shadow of a doubt, etc.

horizontal rule
199

polyurethane v. latex

You know, I don't think I've ever even thought to note the difference.

horizontal rule
200

And I would agree, adding that there is, even in the most responsible of us, a tendency to behave in accordance with perceived norms. And for all the legacy reasons you mention, the perceived norm is that children of unmarried parents live with the mother and the father does or doesn't have visits with the kids and does or doesn't pay child support. This is something we're just going to have to evolve away from, as more men and women who have grown up thinking consciously about these issues become the people who are in unmarried-parenting situations.

horizontal rule
201

I don't think I've ever even thought to note the difference.

Unless you have a latex allergy, there isn't much difference to note.

horizontal rule
202

Lambskin's making a comeback. No disease prevention, just birth control, supposedly more comfy (don't know personally.) Good turn-on if you're into bestiality too.

horizontal rule
203

202: but expensive.

horizontal rule
204

What's expensive, lambskin condoms or beastiality?

horizontal rule
205

It's worth noting that a popular men's magazine has run an article taking the scummy men's rights position; I can't find the full text of the article but here's a book slut post that discusses it; scroll down to Details. I actually only read the article because it was in the waiting room of the health clinic where I was waiting for the MA pill, and I came in spluttering about it to the gyno. "Let me take that from you and throw it out," he said. Then he went on to express to me at length his profound hatred of the Bush Administration.

It may be that Details is an outlier, and is trying to carve out a niche for itself as the retrograde upscale glossy. The next article began, "The Federal Aviation Administration is looking for a few good men."

horizontal rule
206

They're doing interesting things with fleece nowadays.

horizontal rule
207

201: I'd disagree, because I have a stong preference, and I don't think I have a latex allergy, but possibly I do and it's very mild.

horizontal rule
208

207: Fair enough. I was speaking from my experience, but it occurs to me that the condom experience in general is probably a bit different for men and women.

horizontal rule
209

Perhaps I should clarify, in case people don't click through, that it's taking a worse position than the one Armsmasher is describing, i.e., it's asserting the right to ditch a child if you can't tell the woman to have an abortion; it describes that action as "the male abortion."

horizontal rule
210

Link in 205: The description of the Vanity Fair cover does not seem to match the illustration.

And I'd need some heavy convincing before I came around to 198. It seems likely to me that men have more political power and are going to resist changes in the law that would disadvantage them. Think Newt Gingrich.

horizontal rule
211

I don't really get you on that. While there certainly need to be changes in the law to handle the sorts of marginal situations Jackm was talking about, I don't see family law now as systematically advantaging men. Societal practices tend to leave women not married to the fathers of their children disproportionately taking care of those children, but that's not particularly due to the state of the law as I understand it.

horizontal rule
212

#197: Polyurethane.

I support the right of men to waive their parental responsibilities as soon as the men who want to do it get out there and start lobbying to restore AFDC and make it automatic for single moms at a level that matches local average incomes for two-parent families.

horizontal rule
213

I know someone who's been associated with family courts in one New England state. Apparently there's a presumption in favor of the man if he wants custody, even in cases where there is evidence of spousal or child abuse by the man- it is then the woman's burden to prove he is unfit. My reading of this is that courts assume men won't want custody, and if they make a claim for it, they must be a male of outstanding character and therefore should presumptively be favored.

horizontal rule
214

139:

I betcha someone already answered this very well but - hey - here is my answer anyway.

I used condoms pre-marriage. When I met my future wife she was on BC pills for health reasons (Yippee!) but was also Catholic (Awww).

After marriage we used the pill and I personally accepted the risk that my wife might get pregnant anyway. I knew there was a small but greater than zero risk that my wife might 'forget' or whatever but I accepted that risk.

Along the way we've popped out four sprogs. I was ready to stop at three but my wife wanted the fourth, and of course I love my fourth child to death.

BUT I also said before 4 was born I was stopping and it was time for the snip-snip and my fathering days were over, and my wife was cool with that. Interestingly enough they wouldn't give me the big V until my wife gave birth, saying I might change my mind.

horizontal rule
215

I've heard that here in Chicago if you and your ex both want child custody, and one of you believes in the Sky Fairy and the other doesn't, the non-believer is in trouble. Judges assume that the Sky Fairy-believer is the better parent. Every courtroom says "In God We Trust" on the wall.

horizontal rule
216

Yeah, wasn't there some custody dispute case recently between two Wiccan parents where the judge ordered that the child be indoctrinated in the Sky Fairy even though neither parent wanted that?

horizontal rule
217

we've popped out four sprogs

Somehow I've never heard anyone refer to their children and their births that way before.

horizontal rule
218

As someone who's spent a fair amount of time sitting in courtrooms, the great thing about 'In God We Trust' is how well it anagrams: e.g., "Nurse dog, twit!"

horizontal rule
219

Here's the case.

horizontal rule
220

Not to be the language police again, but, guys, uh, "Sky Fairy?" Is it not possible to decry anti-atheist prejudice (which I feel not occasionally) without using that term? Just sayin'.

horizontal rule
221

Yeah, it should totally be 'Sky Priss'.

horizontal rule
222

Thought about makin' that joke myself.

horizontal rule
223

Don't know when I started talkin' like a cowboy.

horizontal rule
224

we've decided that the proper term is the Gay Sex.

horizontal rule
225

There are thousands- even a couple legally relevant ones:

WINGED TORT US

NUDGE WRITS TO

horizontal rule
226

It's good for hours of waiting-for-your-case-to-be-called amusement!

horizontal rule
227

Somehow I've never heard anyone refer to their children and their births that way before.

Really? It is a pre-emptive strike at the 'childfree' crowd. Kinda like bphd calling herself bitchphd.

I think sprog means 'stupid progeny' but I'm not sure. I like the term better than 'crotch droppings,' but that is because I'm not really into scatological terms.

horizontal rule
228

Ankle-biters!

horizontal rule
229

It's good for hours of waiting-for-your-case-to-be-called amusement!

heh heh. It is good to see that other professions also have their "I went to college for THIS?' moments.

horizontal rule
230

Re: LB in 200!, I'm ready to believe that divorce culture acts as a similarly influencial perceived norm, a Solomon's wisdom—the best thing to do for kids in these situations is to split their custody down the middle. But I don't know whether most divorced families result in joint-custody situations, so I'm not sure it's the prevailing divorce norm, but we at least have a standard out there other than nuclear family or single mom.

horizontal rule
231

OK, Tripp, I grant you that "crotch droppings" is even worse. :P

Not to be the language police again, but, guys, uh, "Sky Fairy?" Is it not possible to decry anti-atheist prejudice (which I feel not occasionally) without using that term? Just sayin'.

I try to give religion the respect it deserves: none. Adults don't normally believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy. God is no different. Believing that you have an invisible friend is delusional, period.

horizontal rule
232

Linoleum lizards! Rug monkeys! Deductions!

horizontal rule
233

What's with the saved data being eaten all the time (only one field at a time though)?

And Frederick just open a can of worms, mefears.

horizontal rule
234

211: OK, I know nothing whatsoever about the law, so I withdraw what I said about it completely.

But, insofar as Smasher is saying in 198 that men are in general totally responsible except for the men's-rights scum, and the vestiges of the "women take care of the children, men pay child support" paradigm are with us only because of historico-structural factors, I just have my doubts. As Tia points out, the men's-rights scum want even less responsibility than that (and John Tierney seems to think this is logical). I think there's a long way to parental equality, and a lot of men don't want to go there. Remember, our friends tend to be young and liberal.

And I will defend to my dying day the proposition that the Vanity Fair cover here does not show "a glowing Martha Stewart... embracing a little black dog."

horizontal rule
235

if we're going to start giving people the respect they deserve, Frederick, this is going to become a less pleasant place for you.

horizontal rule
236

Horrors.

horizontal rule
237

(Actually, I think none of the covers match, due to deep-linking issues.)

horizontal rule
238

what I mean to say is: there is little you have written here that I have personally enjoyed, but I wouldn't want to speak for everyone, or presume to understand their thoughts and beliefs.

horizontal rule
239

Pwecious widdle tax cwedit.

'Childfree' people puzzle me. I can understand not wanting to have kids; I can't understand the vitriol. Maybe the ones I know are idiots.

'Like, omg! They had kids! That's so wasteful in this day and age,' she says, wearing top of the line clothing, driving her SUV, covered in makeup and jewelry, with her six bedroom house.

Okayyyy.

horizontal rule
240

which I feel not occasionally)

Just to be clear -- do you (not occasionally) feel such prejudice, or the effects of such prejudice? Because I had not figured you to be biased contra irreligionists.

horizontal rule
241

And I'm with useta-be-tweedledopey about the gradually disappearing input fields. Is it my punishment for not being anonymous? Cause I'll break out the indecipherable nicknames quicker than you can say Kcaj Nosnibor.

horizontal rule
242

239: I think they're generally people who like conflict, and being rude about other people's children is a surefire way of inciting a good one.

horizontal rule
243

I dunno. Even if one believes in God, and believes atheists are all going to hell, referring to them as the Damned or Future Demon Toasties is still rude.

(I could point out that one could believe in God and believe quite easily that it's wrong for a judge to decide a custody battle based on using someone's religiosity as a proxy for their parental fitness, but that's probably being overly pedantic.)

horizontal rule
244

The child-free thing has been done.

horizontal rule
245

Jeremy Osner, I am irreligious, and feel the effects of such prejudice. Sorry for the ambiguity. I am now belatedly regretting starting another fight, but Frederick, in a community which includes several professed believers, all of whom have an excellent sense of humor about their religion, while I can't speak for the proprietors of this site, your comment strikes me as just about tantamount to trolling.

horizontal rule
246

I am irrelevant, and feel the effect of prune juice.

horizontal rule
247

Just so long as you're no longer irregular.

horizontal rule
248

You're so irreverent. Prune juice makes my movements irridescent.

horizontal rule
249

I too am irreligious and make a point of not belittling other people's religious beliefs (though of course I leave exceptions up to my own discretion) -- I've thought the first few times I encountered it that the "sky faerie" construct was kind of amusing and looked for a way to drop it into conversation in some context/milieu where it would not cause offense and would cause chuckles. Reckon it's played at this point though, before I ever got my chance.

horizontal rule
250

there is little you have written here that I have personally enjoyed

OK. I don't recall experiencing an orgasm or anything upon reading anything you've written, text. I take it you're offended by my criticism of religion. It's odd: religious folks, on the whole, think that atheists are the scum of the earth (for example, less than 50% say they would ever vote for an atheist for president -- see link below), but they think that we have to respect their religions. It's OK for me to criticize any other idea people have, but religion is somehow sacrosanct and immune from criticism. Bullshit.

Being an atheist is still "the most discriminated-against characteristic of the eight tested in the research," according to the latest Gallup poll asking who people would vote for for U.S. President.

http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/eml9527.htm

horizontal rule
251

Frederick, I'm something of a militant atheist as well, but there's something to be said for maintaining comity when it's being extended to you.

(That being said, I laughed at "Sky Fairy." I've been know to say "Invisible Man in the Sky" for the same concept.)

horizontal rule
252

Lotta people round here need to get rid of their Body Thetans.

horizontal rule
253

religious folks, on the whole, think that atheists are the scum of the earth

You are ignoring your milieu -- do the specific religious folk who frequent Unfogged comments threads think atheists are scum?

horizontal rule
254

252: Will that make me act like Tom Cruise? Because I'll just keep 'em if it's gonna come to that.

horizontal rule
255

there's something to be said for maintaining comity when it's being extended to you.

I agree with that principle. text didn't extend me any comity, saying that I would be in trouble if people started according me the respect I deserved. That pissed me off. Go figure.

horizontal rule
256

I'm pretty much with Chopper all the way: atheist, thought Sky Fairy was funny and not terribly over-the-line in itself, but if I were a theist, and plenty of people I respect are, 250 would be a distinct piss-off.

horizontal rule
257

If you have anything intelligent to say against religion, please, have at it. What you've done is insult, well, me, several times over, at first ignorantly, then purposefully. It shouldn't need to be said that the set of all religious people includes some who do not consider atheists "the scum of the earth." But apparently it does.

You're being an ass. I would guess you don't recall experiencing very many orgasms from any kind of stimuli.

horizontal rule
258

Do you know any religious folk? Call me cynical, but I'm often suspicious of arguments that begin 'All Christians (Jews, Hindus, whatever) believe such, and such, but I've never met one. How quaint!'

Certainly no one where has been rude to atheists or dismissive of them, though I may start using 'Future Demon Toasties' because it makes me think of breakfast cereal.

horizontal rule
259

Is this the point where Emerson is supposed to come in and start asking -gg-d for a new post?

horizontal rule
260

It was intended as a distinct piss-off to text, who intimated that I was unworthy of respect. I have no problem extending respect to people, including believers, who respect me.

horizontal rule
261

I just don't like "Sky Fairy" because it's way overplayed, and casually dismissive of people who comment here.

horizontal rule
262

I didn't say you would be in trouble, but rather that nothing you've written here deserves any respect. If that were pointed out to you, you might not like it. You might rather live in a system where things are let slide.

horizontal rule
263

I'm with 256, with the proviso that I'm an occasionally practicing Jew and my beliefs about God are none of anyone's business. I also thought 231 was needlessly abrasive.

Anyway: Scientology is teh wacko! Ain't it?

horizontal rule
264

It's quite obvious that being Norse is the way to go.

horizontal rule
265

You betcha. It occasionally worries me that I have a soft spot for John Travolta despite this.

horizontal rule
266

I'm going to stay out of this one, but 260 and 231 seem at odds with one another.

horizontal rule
267

...but I really don't think of myself as the enforcer of righteousness in Unfogged comments. Truly I don't.

horizontal rule
268

Frederick, you do see that text's comments are in reaction to your 231, no?

horizontal rule
269

I apologize to anyone not named text who was offended by what I said. And text, I could say lots of things about religion, but I doubt anyone other than you wants to hear them at the moment, so I shall forbear from doing so.

horizontal rule
270

My favorite cf term is "Breeder"--in fact, I have a t-shirt that says that across the chest, which I used to enjoy wearing around my mostly gay neighborhood. People found it amusing.

On the athiest question, speaking as a Catholic, I only think *some* athiests are the scum of the earth. But I do in general think that terms like bitch, breeder, and sky fairy are better used with a sense of self-deprecating humor rather than to insult people.

horizontal rule
271

and I note that my assertions haven't been contradicted.

horizontal rule
272

Tia asked why I used the term, and I answered her. But yeah, it probably would have been better not to start this brouhaha.

horizontal rule
273

I have no problem extending respect to people, including believers, who respect me.

If we're going to get into "who started it" exegesis, you did say in 231 that religion was worthy of no respect. Then when text disrespected you in return, your 250 extended that disrespect to all believers in religion -- many of whom post here and have not done anything to disrespect you.

I wouldn't want to give you a global piss-off, but I would much rather that this comment board be one in which we tried not to go over the line against anyone's religion. Except Scientology. And Shi'a.

horizontal rule
274

A sex thread that became a religion thread. All we need to do is subtly change the religion talk over to evolution/ID and we can have a new comments record.

So, is that Darwin dude wacko or what?

horizontal rule
275

text! you are a Lion! raorrrrr.

'Sky Fairy' didn't bother me until the equation of all religion with imaginary friends (because a well-worked out belief system is exactly the same as a childhood delusion). Before that it was an overplayed cutesy way to group a lot of religions together.

horizontal rule
276

Yay, a fight!

First - Be Amusing!

Second - Cleverness is also good.

Third - Irony and jiu jitsu are most apprecated.

Everybody ready?

Okay - ready - break!

horizontal rule
277

Feh, 273 posted before I saw 272, and is unnecessary. I retract it completely. Except for the part about making fun of Shi'ites.

horizontal rule
278

exactly jeremy. Frederick--you are being an ignoramus if you think that all religion is the caricature you describe Labs and ogged have posted on this in the past.

horizontal rule
279

'Sky Fairy' didn't bother me until the equation of all religion with imaginary friends

Hm. I always hear it used this way.

horizontal rule
280

273: C'mon. I think we need to be able to hack on Mormons. And Hutterites.

horizontal rule
281

In fact, Scientology rulz! (Where's tom?)

horizontal rule
282

#265: LB, you and I have really got to stop meeting minds like this.

horizontal rule
283

Like I said -- Thanksgiving next year. You bring the sweet potatoes.

horizontal rule
284

"Let Down" is the worst Radiohead song.

horizontal rule
285

How can you tell?

horizontal rule
286

No, "Electioneering," with that stupid cowbell.

horizontal rule
287

Chopper stole my line.

horizontal rule
288

Swimming is prissy.

horizontal rule
289

Kids are for girls!

horizontal rule
290

Trix are for kids!

horizontal rule
291

Why can't we all just get along?

horizontal rule
292

LizardBreath is in favor of child prostitution! Disbarment!

horizontal rule
293

G0d is banned!

horizontal rule
294

287: You hate the Hutterites too?

horizontal rule
295

Hey! Chopper, do we need to rumble?

horizontal rule
296

Take my job, please!

horizontal rule
297

SUre! I'll start:

BRRRRRRRRRumBumBumBumBummmmm...

horizontal rule
298

293: No, gay sex is banned!

Tia's mouth drooped as she realized there would be no more Unfogged.

horizontal rule
299

Starburst limon (from the baja edition) taste like bathroom soap smells.

horizontal rule
300

and I note that my assertions haven't been contradicted.

What assertions are those, text? Those in 257? OK, here goes:

What you've done is insult, well, me, several times over, at first ignorantly, then purposefully.

You were offended by one of my remarks, insulted me ("several times over" at this point), and I insulted you back. So basically "True."

the set of all religious people includes some who do not consider atheists "the scum of the earth."

True.

You're being an ass.

That's a subjective assessment, so I can't call it true or false.

I would guess you don't recall experiencing very many orgasms from any kind of stimuli.

False.

Happy?

horizontal rule
301

come on, guys. Nothing on OK Computer can be Radiohead's worst song.

horizontal rule
302

Seriously, though, JM: no offense intended. (Although I thought you weren no longer a member?)

horizontal rule
303

the assertion was that nothing you've written here deserves any respect.

horizontal rule
304

Why I oughta . . .

horizontal rule
305

I'd let that slide if only you'd let us religious slide with our childish religious beliefs.

horizontal rule
306

oughta what?

horizontal rule
307

No, you're supposed to say, "300!"

horizontal rule
308

Everyone roll Initiative, except for Weiner, who gets a permanent -2.

horizontal rule
309

Coldplay is better than Radiohead.

horizontal rule
310

This whole argument is so gay.

horizontal rule
311

290: LizardBreath, I take serious offense at that.

horizontal rule
312

Chopper, no apology will be accepted; we are to rumble and rumble we shall!

BRRRRRRRRRumBumBumBumBummmmm...

BRRRRRRRRRumBumBumBumBummmmm...

BRRRRRRRRRumBumBumBumBummmmm...

horizontal rule
313

I like "Electioneering," with the cowbell. The Cowbell Project should be awesome, except it doesn't have any working MP3s. I really wanted to hear the Wham! song mit cowbell. Not up to The Truck Driver's Gear Change Hall of Shame.

horizontal rule
314

270: "On the athiest question"

I'm not sure it's the athiest question, but it certainly is athier than others.

horizontal rule
315

308: I wanna cast Magic Missile!

horizontal rule
316

Also: Zinzindorfians are hilarious.

horizontal rule
317

Don't make me come over there.

horizontal rule
318

I'm attacking the darkness!

horizontal rule
319

I don't want to be Elfstar anymore! I want to be Debbie!

horizontal rule
320

315: ATM

Anybody know where I can find some cheap mobic?

horizontal rule
321

309: Joe O wins the trolling contest.

horizontal rule
322

Nooo! Blackleaf!

(Chopper Sneaks around the corner. He encounters a gelatinous Cube!)

horizontal rule
323

the assertion was that nothing you've written here deserves any respect.

You had said "assertions," so I responded to a comment in which you had made multiple assertions, not one in which you made only one assertion. I think I've said things here that deserve respect, although I suppose my opinion isn't the most relevant.

I'd let that slide if only you'd let us religious slide with our childish religious beliefs.

Of course, people can have whatever religious beliefs they want, childish or otherwise.

horizontal rule
324

Sweet potatoes, you're on. Are you one of those comfort food people who insists on retaining the marshmallows, or are we thinking some kind of gingered kind of thing? Or can I just put 'em in a pie?

horizontal rule
325

You are confronted by a grue.

horizontal rule
326

(Guys, break it up, please?)

horizontal rule
327

Okay, now you've done it.

I was sworn to secrecy but so what? Here are the answers:

1. Order

2. Yes

3. Self reference

4. Not technically, but he is easily led and was warped during his childhood.

5. Enjoy

horizontal rule
328

Am I the only one who read 324 as some kind of adorably old fashioned exclamation?

"Sweet potatoes! You're on!"

Or as an unusual term of endearment?

horizontal rule
329

And thank you, Chopper, for addressing "the athiest question." I had considered doing so myself (I hate that misspelling, which one somehow sees a lot -- "athiest OR athiests" gets 513,000 hits on Google), but figured I was getting enough grief as it was. Besides, BPhD already hates me.

horizontal rule
330

I said assertions, because in truth, I have said many times that you don't deserve any respect.

horizontal rule
331

You shoot an arrow at the grue.

(pfffffff)

It vanishes into the darkness.

Your lantern is growing dimmer.

horizontal rule
332

>Drop emerald.

>Get ax

>Throw ax.

horizontal rule
333

Matt, you're such a pussy.

horizontal rule
334

B, I think the preferred term is priss.

horizontal rule
335

B, you ginger the sweet potatoes and put the marshmallow topping on top! And then everyone eats it and gets a sugar high.

horizontal rule
336

Here's my point: we can have an atmosphere of complete frankness, where you feel free to tell all us children about how there isn't any tooth fairy, and I tell you that you are boring, adding very little to any of these threads, or we can observe the normal niceties.

horizontal rule
337

You have entered a room filled with twisty little passages, all alike. There is a pointless, personal dispute here.

horizontal rule
338

you ginger the sweet potatoes and put the marshmallow topping on top

And that's not a euphemism.

horizontal rule
339

Your axe flies through the air and hits the wall, sticking into a crevice.

Your lantern is growing dimmer.

horizontal rule
340

Can I get some without the marshmallows? Save a little dish aside for me like when I was a kid at Xmas/Chanukah?

Okay, so I never ate Chanukah sweet potatoes.

horizontal rule
341

#333 was to #326, not to #328, my little sweet potato.

horizontal rule
342

#334: Ah, but as a pussy-owner myself, I reserve the right to reclaim the term.

horizontal rule
343

If you drop an emerald in the presence of a grue, doesn't it change color?

horizontal rule
344

You pull your axe out, and thrust it in again.

Your lantern is growing dimmer.

horizontal rule
345

B, I never thought so for a second.

Also, Tia has just inspired me to run home and make sweet potato latkes.

horizontal rule
346

They're good without marshmallows, too. Mmmm.

And you have to have real cranberry sauce (made with berries) and canned Gelatinous Cranberry (for the kids who don't like the berries.)

horizontal rule
347

342: And all the best stuff is going down next Tuesday.

horizontal rule
348

Yum!

horizontal rule
349

I made cranberry sauce with apricot brandy this T-day. Yumlicious if I do say so myself.

horizontal rule
350

Weiner, I dunno. Fucking grue always ate me first.

horizontal rule
351

ok, I haven't revoked my unserious card I hope. I want to fight some grue too.

horizontal rule
352

Roast grue with cranberry sauce for everyone!

horizontal rule
353

good. the grue is hungry.

horizontal rule
354

350: from green to blue, IYKWIM.

horizontal rule
355

You do not make a comment about the slit made by the ax, unless you are BPhD.

horizontal rule
356

text, it was all my fault. if I were empowered to give out cards, you could have any you wanted. I want to fight grue, but I don't even know what game we're playing. Maybe I'll make stuff up.

The TiVo glimmers in the distance. Your goal: reset it.

horizontal rule
357

I discovered turkey is good with grape jelly in a sandwich.

horizontal rule
358

we can observe the normal niceties.

"Niceties" means "subtleties"; it has nothing to do with being nice. But as I've said, I would rather not have set off World War III here. I'm quite willing to let the thing drop, and I daresay everyone else would appreciate that.

horizontal rule
359

Next post on Unfogged: WW3: Atheists vs. Believers?

horizontal rule
360

I have been thinking that philosophical arguments would be more fun if we could feed the loser to the grue:

Descartes: I think, therefore God is not t3h d3c31v3r!

Everyone else: Circul4r! Grue!

horizontal rule
361

I don't see how it was your fault, Tia, but thanks for the cards.

I fire one arrow at the TiVo reset button.

horizontal rule
362

I discovered turkey is good with grape jelly in a sandwich.

Mmm, a Thanksgiving sandwich. That's what I always do with the leftovers—take the turkey, the sweet potatoes, the mashed potatoes, the green bean casserole, and plenty of cranberry sauce, and throw it on a hoagie.

horizontal rule
363

c414 is t3h l337

horizontal rule
364

#355: No, I'm the new, less strident BPhD, remember?

I like to make two kinds of cranberry sauce, one with horseradish, and one with oranges. Though really the horseradish one is way better.

horizontal rule
365

Tia crosses the room to reset the TiVo:

You cannot do that. You need a remote to reset the TiVo.

horizontal rule
366

Frederick,

No, no, please do go on. We would all appreciate being educated by you.

horizontal rule
367

Right, I can be subtle with regard to my contempt for you, or I can be quite frank.

horizontal rule
368

text, knock it off and help Tia reset the TiVo. :P

horizontal rule
369

Horseradish in cranberry sause? I am simultaneously repelled and attracted.

horizontal rule
370

By "make two kinds of cranberry sauce," I infer that you mean "open two cans of cranberry sauce." No one can make that stuff.

horizontal rule
371

(369: I agree -- I've always made mine with orange juice/zest. Does horseradish complement cranberries? Is it still a sweet sauce?)

horizontal rule
372

ok. where's that remote?

horizontal rule
373

The Swede has it. You must find the Swede.

horizontal rule
374

Right, I can be subtle with regard to my contempt for you, or I can be quite frank.

I don't really give a rat's ass, text.

horizontal rule
375

to ogged's pool then!

horizontal rule
376

370: Cranberry sauce is the easiest thing on the planet. Bag of cranberries, cup of sugar, cup of water, boil. Add orange peel or anything else that seems like a good idea.

That's it. Easy-peasy. And quite impressive to people who are used to the canne dstuff.

horizontal rule
377

375 to 373. Though perhaps it works for 374.

horizontal rule
378

--Look under sofa

There is nothing under the sofa but dustbunnies

--Look under the sofa cushions

You found $0.02! Go blog!

--Kick sofa

Hey, that's not nice.

horizontal rule
379

xyzzy

horizontal rule
380

Picturing ogged's pool as sort of a Thunderdome-type thing?

horizontal rule
381

It's sweet and spicy. Believe it or not, it's the recipe Susan Stanberg always makes a big deal about reading on NPR. One year we got curious and decided to try it. Delish!

Arms, what do you mean no one can make cranberry sauce? It's easy.

horizontal rule
382

JM -- 337 made me chuckle out loud.

B and ' -- I am hereby claiming the affiliation "athiest". Like atheism but with fun mispronunciation errors.

horizontal rule
383

>Look

You are in a room filled with twisty little passages in all directions. Ahead of you glimmers a radiant TiVo, beyond which you can faintly make out the shape of an ecstasy that you have rarely--and certainly recently--ever perceived. The TiVo appears to be stuck recording old episodes of "Friends" and "Seinfeld." Somewhere nearby, you can hear the snuffling of a grue. There is an ax in a slit here. There is an emerald here. There is a pointless, personal dispute here. Your lantern is dimming.

horizontal rule
384

ROFCMAO

horizontal rule
385

Cackling?

horizontal rule
386

Where's Ben when you need someone to mock your typos?

horizontal rule
387

385 -- chuckling.

horizontal rule
388

There's some sort of "ATM" joke to be made with #380 but I can't... quite... get there...

horizontal rule
389

xyzzy

Plugh.

horizontal rule
390

I understand it's full of sharp screwdrivers.

horizontal rule
391

>Go North.

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. Above you, you hear splashing sounds, as though lushious Swedish babes were cavorting gaily in a swimming pool.

horizontal rule
392

>Listen

You hear a squeaking sound, and the click clack of high heels. This is not the cave you seek.

horizontal rule
393

384: coughing. Take smaller hits, dude. You're wasting it.

horizontal rule
394

ROTF cackling MAO is pretty brilliant. I really can't stop laughing at that.

horizontal rule
395

>Lick emerald

I don't know that word.

horizontal rule
396

>Buy cheap mobic

There was no effect.

horizontal rule
397

383 is teh funny.

horizontal rule
398

Children, children! If you'd been talking about bestiality and age-of-consent laws the way I told you to, none of the unpleasantness would have happened. Listen to your Uncle.

I appreciate your efforts at comity, but cranberry sauce is a lame, desperate, perverted substitute for bestiality.

horizontal rule
399

394: But I had "chuckling" in mind. "Cackling" is LB's astute reading.

horizontal rule
400

Your lantern is dimming.

Poignant. Almost poetry.

Bravo!

horizontal rule
401

400! (I also had 300).

horizontal rule
402

398 has it exactly right.

horizontal rule
403

I will not accept food advice from a man who disdains the magical sprouts of Brussels.

horizontal rule
404

John Emerson, maybe you ought to consider getting your llama a lady (or gentleman) friend.

horizontal rule
405

Sigh.

horizontal rule
406

Sorry frederick.

The moving finger writes . . .

horizontal rule
407

Or at least some stuffing to go with all this goddamn cranberry sauce.

horizontal rule
408

You are in a mineshaft.

horizontal rule
409

Take pill

horizontal rule
410

Your prospects are dimming.

horizontal rule
411

Llama, you do know that J.E. used to be a goat, right?

horizontal rule
412

text-- e-mail me

horizontal rule
413

The assumption I drew from the stuff inside cans of cranberry sauce was that it was not really composed of cranberries but something altogether indivisible.

horizontal rule
414

Are you going to form an exclusive believers' club, bg?

horizontal rule
415

no

horizontal rule
416

She and text are going to have teh hott sex with a metaphysical conceit. It will be unclear what is a metaphor for what in the tangle of limbs and desire.

horizontal rule
417

Jesus, I can't leave you people alone.

horizontal rule
418

One thing I've often thought is that we could build a little nondenominational chapel upstairs from the Mineshaft, for the observant among the dancers and spectators.

horizontal rule
419

Lofty sentiments are welcome at Banana Lofts.

horizontal rule
420

Why Tia, I think you're right. She did declare her love for him upthread.

horizontal rule
421

I think they're heading over to the Unfogged chatroom.

horizontal rule
422

can't defend --dying keys

horizontal rule
423

Your denial would only be a confirmation.

horizontal rule
424

409- so we're coming full circle back to birth control?

horizontal rule
425

So why the hell do men just leave cranberry sauce to women?

horizontal rule
426

No, I'm the new, less strident BPhD, remember?

What? What? What? Huh?

can't defend --dying keys

Invoke the Seven-Bladed Bukkake Server Killing Joke.

ash

['BZZT. {squich}{squich}']

horizontal rule
427

Do the evolution: Men were out hunting the fiercesome turkey while women were gathering the sides.

horizontal rule
428

So why the hell do men just leave cranberry sauce to women?

Geez, apo - you can't hunt cranberries!

Sheesh. Don't go getting all weakly soupy on me.

horizontal rule
429

So speaking of wingnuts and contraception, did you hear that a judge decided fetuses don't count for meeting the requirements in an HOV lane? There goes another incentive to get pregnant.

Oh, and about religion- I was thinking someone should spend a year converting to all the major religions (say one month per and cover 12 different ones) and write a book about it- something like "Holier than thou- diary of a serial convert." I'd love to know all the wacky secret rituals for Scientology and Mormonism.

horizontal rule
430

while women were gathering the sides

In fact, it was one particularly clever woman who discovered the tree that produced cranberry sauce already in the shape of a can.

horizontal rule
431

Can't speak for the others, but it takes a long time to convert to Judaism.

horizontal rule
432

I'd love to know all the wacky secret rituals for Scientology and Mormonism.

Ummmmmmm, the internet.

Come on.

horizontal rule
433

Is SP secretly Morgan Spurlock?

horizontal rule
434

I converted from Lutheran to Methodist and all I got was switched from wine to grape juice.

horizontal rule
435

And you'd have to get married in the temple to know all the whacky secret Mormon rituals. Or you could google for them.

horizontal rule
436

Invoke the Seven-Bladed Bukkake Server Killing Joke.

Tip for Travelers:

When the term bukkake is used in Japan, it usually refers to a method of preparing noodles and not the sexual act.

I'm ashamed to say that I learned what "bukkake" means only about a month ago, when I saw Echidne of the Snakes use it in a comment thread at Atrios/Eschaton, and looked it up.

horizontal rule
437

When the term bukkake is used in Japan, it usually refers to a method of preparing noodles and not the sexual act.

So....Bostoniangirl should lash you with noodles then.

ash

['Your noodles lack...profundity.']

horizontal rule
438

And you'd have to get married in the temple to know all the whacky secret Mormon rituals.

My wife and I tried to get married outside, with the wedding performed by a judge and devoid of any religious references. However, the Sky Fairy smote our atheistic asses by making it rain like crazy.

horizontal rule
439

fiercesome

Come again?

horizontal rule
440

now I've got to defend BG's honor. She's just really interested in the Narnia books, ok?

horizontal rule
441

However, the Sky Fairy smote our atheistic asses by making it rain like crazy.

Ok. I wasn't quite following the exchange above. You're the hardcore Atheist Dude and text found this offensive, so you were offended by his offendedness, which text found offensive. I think.

Is that right?

ash

['Or am I missing it?']

horizontal rule
442

440: I'll just bet she is.

horizontal rule
443

mmm...texty...say what you will about Aslan, but I'm glad you turned out to be a Lion

horizontal rule
444

Guh, I am teh idiot.

horizontal rule
445

ash, I believe text said he was offended by my description of belief in a deity as delusional, rather than the SF reference itself. I might be wrong on that. But in any case, I used the term in an ironic, making-fun-of-myself sense in 438, since if the Sky Fairy smote us, he/she/it must in fact exist.

horizontal rule
446

438- same thing happened to me. Actually started raining just after we finished. We did a non-religious ritual based on some culturally Jewish things (drink wine, break glass). But the officiant forgot to bring the wine.

I have been in a Mormon temple, technically before it was blessed or consecrated or whatever- they had tours post-construction pre-blessing. Them's some wacky rituals.

horizontal rule
447

Them's some wacky rituals.

Well, you know, reptile brain and all.

horizontal rule
448

She's just really interested in the Narnia books, ok?

Does she love the CHRONIC(what?)les of Narnia?

horizontal rule
449

Well, you know, reptile brain and all.

Aha! Maybe we can get ogged to perform the Ritual Burning of the Legwarmers!

That'll fix EVERYTHING! Except this gay YHWH thing.

ash

['You're making the Baby Jesus CRY!']

horizontal rule
450

Jackmormon, do you still wear the magic underwear? Or is that a personal question?

horizontal rule
451

What I can't understand is, why someone new to a community would antagonize a beloved member of said community, especially when the new person seems to enjoy the community's company and likely wants to hang out in the community for awhile. I suppose it's perfectly within new person's rights to antagonize whoever s/he wishes, but it just seems, well, unproductive.

Hypothetically speaking, of course.

Who wants to talk about the brilliant moustache theory?

horizontal rule
452

fiercesome turkey

it's "fearsome, but really this is better.

(wmibsalp?)

horizontal rule
453

(Actually, Emerson, I think that question's borderline offensive, along the lines of Sky Fairy.)

horizontal rule
454

"

horizontal rule
455

(This is me whispering.)

horizontal rule
456

I owned to being teh idiot in 444, but I guess it was a particularly grievous homophonic slip.

horizontal rule
457

(whispering what?)

horizontal rule
458

duh.

horizontal rule
459

(Religious sensitivity, to Emerson.)

horizontal rule
460

My guess is that Jackmormon is not religiously sensitive, but if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.

horizontal rule
461

no no, it was great! I'm totally using it from now on.

horizontal rule
462

fiercesome, I mean.

horizontal rule
463

I'm beloved! Thanks, Joe. woot!

horizontal rule
464

Back to the main point of the thread.

horizontal rule
465

429 -- do you have a link? I would love to read about that.

horizontal rule
466

I'm beloved!

text is a dick.

horizontal rule
467

Fetuses don't count.

horizontal rule
468

"text is a dick"

I knew it couldn't last.

horizontal rule
469

In 467: The judge's reasoning is pretty sound.

Here, pee on this stick.

horizontal rule
470

This is way off topic, but the tag "confidential legal notice- publication or disemination is prohibited" on this threat letter is just wishful thinking, right?

horizontal rule
471

"If you carry a condom, chances are you'll use it during the day. It's not going to be there forever."

horizontal rule
472

Here, pee on this stick.

Beats the alternative.

horizontal rule
473

"My client, James Frey, has a substantial financial interest in having it widely believed that he has committed many illegal acts of extreme stupidity, heedlessness, and brutality, and that he has victimized many innocent individuals in doing so.

If you continue to spread your false and erroneous claim that he has, in fact, never been convicted of even a single act of heartless cruelty, his promising career as a memoirist will be harmed and possibly destroyed.

If you fail to retract your outrageous claim that my client is a decent, law-abiding citizen, you can expect to hear from us again.

Yours....."

horizontal rule
474

Any publication disseminated or broadcast of any portion of this letter will constitute a breach of confidence and a violation of the Copyright Act.

You can copyright an unpublished letter? Also, doesn't having something copyrighted imply that it is available for the general public to view? Otherwise it would be like having a secret patent.

horizontal rule
475

you can copyright original material just by writing this on the document, but writers sometimes mail manuscripts to themselves to make the copyright official and have the date post-stamped, i.e. official.

it's your intellectual property.

(ick, i can't stand intellectual property law, even if it might end up protecting me one of these days)

horizontal rule
476

Emerson, re: "Jackmormon, do you still wear the magic underwear?"

You don't wear it unless you've been married in the Temple. Maybe you wear it if you do the "OMG, I'm never going to get married!" version of the Temple ritual, but I don't know anything about that. So: I've never worn it. My mom, having married a Gentile and being Smith-descended (and thus sorta scornful of compliance), never went through the Temple and thus has never worn it either. My older sister, who married in the Temple, does wear it, and, yes, she gets very gently teased.

horizontal rule
477

And to "My guess is that Jackmormon is not religiously sensitive, but if I'm wrong, I'm wrong":

I'm not particularly sensitive on these issues. There can be a certain line, as I think there is with many people, beyond which teasing about my religious background would no longer seem good-natured; we're nowhere near that. I also get uncomfortable when people assert that any transcendental hope/belief/code is delusional because that seems to describe most of my family, myself in prior and occasional moments, and a great many people I respect, either from earlier periods or today.

horizontal rule
478

All that said, I am confident that, in time, The Gay Sex will reveal to the aged Brethren in Utah that gay sex is not an abomination unto The Gay Sex.

horizontal rule
479

If your personal info is disappearing field by field, and you've enabled tom's thread-position hack, try disabling it.

I did, and it worked for me!

horizontal rule
480

Thanks Ben. I was thinking the info eating started around the time of the thread-position hack but had not acted on that. I'll do so.

horizontal rule
481

There are Mormons who don't get married? And there's a ritual for them?

horizontal rule
482

481: yes and yes.

Male mormons go on their missions at 19; women go at 23-24, when they've decided that they're not about to get married. Both sexes have to go through some sort of Temple consacration before they run off preaching righteousness. As far as I understand it, this ritual consacration is rather similar to what couples undergo in order to be married.

But to get the full Temple schtick as an unmarried, my understanding is that you have to admit that you're not likely to get married in this incarnation--which is a pretty embarrassing thing for a Mormon to admit. It happens, theologically it's not a problem in this life, but yeah, the social presumption is that if you're not married, something is wrong with you.

horizontal rule
483

That's "consecration" you unearthly buffoon!

horizontal rule
484

Wouldn't the earthly buffoon be less knowledgeable about ecclesiastical matters?

horizontal rule
485

Devoutly to be wished.

horizontal rule
486

You know, if God=Teh Gay Sex, then that old Janis Joplin song is a prayer whose answer is "Sure, okay!":

"Gay Sex, won't you buy me

a night on the town..."

horizontal rule
487

pwn'd

horizontal rule
488

ow!!

horizontal rule