Oh, god, I clicked before I saw the comment that it wasn't safe for work. Maybe an update saying really, really not safe for work? I was so not braced for hard-core necrobestiality. ('Don't you mean sado-necro-beastiality?' 'Now you're just beating a dead horse.')
Ahahahahahahahahahaha. Ben sent me those links before he posted 'em. I'm going to enjoy watching people's reactions. I think mine was something like "oh, dear god."
A comment on the second link's thread: "I’m proud of the internet. It has finally procured something so completely nonsensical I can only stare at it and wonder what the hell happened to the world."
That and "ew ew ew" pretty much sum up my reaction to these pictures.
Because if it did, you'd be eligible for membership in the DCU.
Posted by
DCU 547 Membership Committee |
Link to this comment |
05-16-06 1:00 PM
15
Guys, I've started deleting rather than editing for clarity. Also, I think lots of discussion of the TOS is only encouraging. I propose a deletion on sight/code of silence policy.
You people talk and talk, maybe sing a few folk songs about the dead chicken plight, but at night you go home to your toasty houses and what have you done for us really?
I agree we need our second topic to be something else.
Anybody have any thoughts about whether the fact that both of these involve creatures is important conceptually, or just for physical sensation? I've cleaned enough chickens to "understand" the first one, but I've never seen the organ featured on the first picture of the crab.
15 - I'd just recommend editing over deleting in high-traffic threads since deleting when other people are posting can mess up comment number references.
22: IDP, I thought that the crab organ in the first picture (link 2) was actually a leg, and therefore not particularly sexual. The sexual part comes afterwards, of course. It's been a while since I've eaten crab on the shell (and now it'll probably be a while before I eat it again), but wouldn't that be sharp?
28 makes me think I may be misunderstanding these pictures which I know only through Unfogged discussion of their contents -- is the crab picture somebody inserting a crab's leg into one of their orifices? I am hoping it is the leg of a dead crab? And yes, that sounds to me like it would be painful. Or is it somebody inserting one of their appendages into the cavity of a crab? That would seem to me like a bizarre and ultimately unrewarding activity but not necessarily painful.
Unlikely, Bitch -- tonight is mostly dedicated to band rehearsal, and to minding The Modesto Youngster. (The Modesto Wife will be otherwise engaged, readying herself for tomorrow's medical ordeal.) If I get online at all it will not be to viddy naked chicks and crabs but rather to snark out my frustrations on this and similar comment threads. Speaking of snark, WTF happened to Fafblog!? I am drowning in a sea of unrealized irony.
I wouldn't say that I vote for creatureness, IDP, but I agree with the other part of your comment. Well, as long as "taking pictures of doing it with creatures and then posting those pictures to gross other people out" is factored into there somewhere.
The chicken one was disgusting The crab one I still don't understand. TMK -- if you're wondering what the chicken one showed, thing "That man could have been known as a warblogger if he hadn't had a good dentist"
46 -- i was thinking of you (in 42), not the TOS post (for which I came too late, and am duly confused).
i think the modesto kid only put into words what a lot of others have probably been feeling, about fafblog... and so if yer name really means you do know what your talking about when you say that fafblog's coming back ... then double-w00t.
and if this is all too revealing, or if i'm completely wrong, then edit this...
Is the Mineshaft blog-connected or what? If this place is one reader removed from Fafblog!, I'm going to keep reading even after clicking through B-Wo's links.
I don't get #2 teh crab one either. I almost thought of that one as art; it sort of reexamines our relationship with food. It underscores the erotic element of all eating.
The first one was just gross and, obviously, NSFW.
People who have sex with food products such as plucked chickens and cooked crabs are sickos with a psychopathic fear of intimacy. True bestiality involves a meaningful, multidimensional relationship between two sensate organisms, with all the emotional risk that that entails, especially in the case of crabs.
Unfogged, the only blog with %100 of your daily allowance of calcium.
Unfogged, the only blog that can't be translated into Basque.
Unfogged, the only blog that snorts cocaine off your belly.
Unfogged, the only blog where I'm going insane.
I'll skip the coke & belly combo, thanks. I'm ticklish, and you'd just end up yelling at me for spilling it all over the sheets, like that scene in Annie Hall.
Oh holy hell. I only now clicked on that link since I'm home from work. That's going to give me nightmares now - I won't even touch raw chicken with my hands without gloves because I'm so paranoid about salmonella.
58: Has anyone figured out what the hell the joke to that punchline is? Incidentally, I looked it up in the credits to Ill Communication and it's from a Moms Mabley album.
I think I've just been scarred for life. Thank you.
Posted by aaa | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:08 PM
Oh, god, I clicked before I saw the comment that it wasn't safe for work. Maybe an update saying really, really not safe for work? I was so not braced for hard-core necrobestiality. ('Don't you mean sado-necro-beastiality?' 'Now you're just beating a dead horse.')
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:09 PM
Ahahahahahahahahahaha. Ben sent me those links before he posted 'em. I'm going to enjoy watching people's reactions. I think mine was something like "oh, dear god."
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:11 PM
and whiskers on kittens...
Posted by Fritz | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:21 PM
Heh, I was reading that Metatalk thread earlier. I wouldn't have thought that jessamyn would be the first one to bring the goods.
Posted by Tarrou | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:23 PM
A comment on the second link's thread: "I’m proud of the internet. It has finally procured something so completely nonsensical I can only stare at it and wonder what the hell happened to the world."
That and "ew ew ew" pretty much sum up my reaction to these pictures.
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:33 PM
You couldn't pay a dead chicken to fuck you, Fritz.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:34 PM
Nothing happened to the world; this stuff has always gone on. Digital cameras and urls have made it easier, or even possible, to "share."
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:42 PM
7 strikes me as remarkably unfair to dead chickens everywhere.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:45 PM
If I've offended any dead chickens, I do apologize.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:51 PM
Is the editing for clarity being rotated? I'd hate to think it falls to one person with other duties.
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:56 PM
Like most things around here, it's ad hoc. Whoever sees it first clarifies it.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:58 PM
Next time, maybe try some research, first? Would that kill you?
Posted by Dead Chickens Union 547 | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 12:58 PM
Because if it did, you'd be eligible for membership in the DCU.
Posted by DCU 547 Membership Committee | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:00 PM
Guys, I've started deleting rather than editing for clarity. Also, I think lots of discussion of the TOS is only encouraging. I propose a deletion on sight/code of silence policy.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:00 PM
But I'm not even finished with the first verse of My Favorite Things.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:01 PM
Oh, that was you LB? I thought those were the original comments. Sorry.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:02 PM
Can we still talk about dead chickens?
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:03 PM
I wonder if Ogged is reading.
Posted by apostropher | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:05 PM
You people talk and talk, maybe sing a few folk songs about the dead chicken plight, but at night you go home to your toasty houses and what have you done for us really?
Posted by Dead Chicken | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:06 PM
Nobody here but us dead chickens.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:06 PM
I agree we need our second topic to be something else.
Anybody have any thoughts about whether the fact that both of these involve creatures is important conceptually, or just for physical sensation? I've cleaned enough chickens to "understand" the first one, but I've never seen the organ featured on the first picture of the crab.
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:08 PM
I wonder if Ogged is reading.
I'm sure he is, with interest.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:09 PM
what have you done for us really?
Lovingly massaged you with scented oils and herbs, and roasted you to a beautiful golden brown? With little crisp potatoes?
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:14 PM
this comment thread is beguiling if you're at work, and so cannot see the pictures[?] in question...
Posted by mike d | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:17 PM
15 - I'd just recommend editing over deleting in high-traffic threads since deleting when other people are posting can mess up comment number references.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:20 PM
24 makes me wish I were a dead chicken...
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:20 PM
22: IDP, I thought that the crab organ in the first picture (link 2) was actually a leg, and therefore not particularly sexual. The sexual part comes afterwards, of course. It's been a while since I've eaten crab on the shell (and now it'll probably be a while before I eat it again), but wouldn't that be sharp?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:22 PM
No Spring chicken
No spring chicken
Noh spring chicken
Know spring chicken!
Posted by Mr. B | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:22 PM
Shit, that last "spring" should've been "Spring"
Posted by Mr B. | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:24 PM
24: "lovingly"? Maybe I'll be reconsidering that Tgiving dinner invite, LB.
26: Small price to pay.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:28 PM
28: So, JM, you vote for creatureness? That the appeal is doing it to these creatures? I think so too, at least in part.
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:30 PM
28 makes me think I may be misunderstanding these pictures which I know only through Unfogged discussion of their contents -- is the crab picture somebody inserting a crab's leg into one of their orifices? I am hoping it is the leg of a dead crab? And yes, that sounds to me like it would be painful. Or is it somebody inserting one of their appendages into the cavity of a crab? That would seem to me like a bizarre and ultimately unrewarding activity but not necessarily painful.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:37 PM
No one answer 33. The Kid will just have to see it for himself when he gets home.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:38 PM
Unlikely, Bitch -- tonight is mostly dedicated to band rehearsal, and to minding The Modesto Youngster. (The Modesto Wife will be otherwise engaged, readying herself for tomorrow's medical ordeal.) If I get online at all it will not be to viddy naked chicks and crabs but rather to snark out my frustrations on this and similar comment threads. Speaking of snark, WTF happened to Fafblog!? I am drowning in a sea of unrealized irony.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:44 PM
Lovingly massaged you with scented oils and herbs
LB's been hypnotizing dead chickens.
Posted by Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:47 PM
I wouldn't say that I vote for creatureness, IDP, but I agree with the other part of your comment. Well, as long as "taking pictures of doing it with creatures and then posting those pictures to gross other people out" is factored into there somewhere.
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 1:57 PM
The chicken one was disgusting The crab one I still don't understand. TMK -- if you're wondering what the chicken one showed, thing "That man could have been known as a warblogger if he hadn't had a good dentist"
Posted by Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 2:09 PM
"thing" s/b "think". (I supposeI could reuse that slogan as the shorter Dan Dennett)
Posted by Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 2:10 PM
No kidding? Really? That's great! It just happens that I love good food too!
Posted by Mr. B | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 2:17 PM
35: Well, if you can't make time for us....
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 2:28 PM
Speaking of snark, WTF happened to Fafblog!? I am drowning in a sea of unrealized irony.
A little bird tells me they're coming back sometime this week.
Should I click on those links or not? I'm of delicate constitution and shan't take well to shock.
Posted by strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 3:36 PM
No.
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 3:46 PM
Too late.
Ah, well. It's not like I was ever planning to eat food again.
Posted by strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 3:57 PM
is 42 a regular unfogged reader? 'cause god, that would explain a whole lot.
Posted by Anonymous | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 3:57 PM
Are you referring to me or to the TOS post that used to be there?
Posted by strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 4:00 PM
Darnit, I knew we should have kept on editing mockingly rather than deleting.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 4:01 PM
46 -- i was thinking of you (in 42), not the TOS post (for which I came too late, and am duly confused).
i think the modesto kid only put into words what a lot of others have probably been feeling, about fafblog... and so if yer name really means you do know what your talking about when you say that fafblog's coming back ... then double-w00t.
and if this is all too revealing, or if i'm completely wrong, then edit this...
Posted by Anonymous | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 4:05 PM
Wow. That may be the missing link in abstinence education.
Posted by benton | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 5:01 PM
Is the Mineshaft blog-connected or what? If this place is one reader removed from Fafblog!, I'm going to keep reading even after clicking through B-Wo's links.
Posted by Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 5:24 PM
I don't get #2 teh crab one either. I almost thought of that one as art; it sort of reexamines our relationship with food. It underscores the erotic element of all eating.
The first one was just gross and, obviously, NSFW.
Posted by Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 5:45 PM
I don't get #2 teh crab one either.
Um, you did scroll down, right?
Posted by My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 6:51 PM
People who have sex with food products such as plucked chickens and cooked crabs are sickos with a psychopathic fear of intimacy. True bestiality involves a meaningful, multidimensional relationship between two sensate organisms, with all the emotional risk that that entails, especially in the case of crabs.
Posted by Anonymous | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 7:40 PM
A beautiful poem.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 7:41 PM
You know, Buck doesn't generally read this blog. I was showing off a little: "Look, look, I got some links," and he saw this post.
"You're posting on a blog about chicken-fucking!? That's disgusting!"
So I've pretty much lost whatever credibility this blogging thing had in the Breath household.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:03 PM
Unfogged, the only blog that has to tell you whethe its both work safe and spouse/so safe....
Posted by benton | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:11 PM
Unfogged, the only blog
BWEEEEEEEEEEOMP
Posted by airhorn | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:19 PM
If I'd known it was that kind of party, I'd have stuck my dick in the mashed potatoes.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:33 PM
You know what I wish I could unwatch? The goatse video.
Why? Why? Why did I have to look around that site?
Posted by Chopper | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:43 PM
Unfogged, the only blog where saying "Unfogged, the only blog" is guaranteed to annoy Standpipe.
Which is, of course, all the more reason to do it as often as possible.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:48 PM
I bet it would annoy SB elsewhere as well, if only SB were aware.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:51 PM
Unfogged, the only blog with %100 of your daily allowance of calcium.
Unfogged, the only blog that can't be translated into Basque.
Unfogged, the only blog that snorts cocaine off your belly.
Unfogged, the only blog where I'm going insane.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 8:53 PM
Unfogged, the only blog that snorts cocaine off your belly.
Sign me up! But only if it comes with a side of drunk Apo flashing his tits.
Posted by Travis | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:11 PM
I'll skip the coke & belly combo, thanks. I'm ticklish, and you'd just end up yelling at me for spilling it all over the sheets, like that scene in Annie Hall.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:14 PM
Except it wasn't cocaine, it was lobsters.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:27 PM
wait, I thought it was a crab?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:29 PM
No, that was the kitchen scene.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:29 PM
Then what the hell movie was I watching with the lobster snorting?
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:30 PM
Kitchen = lobsters.
Bathroom = spiders.
Living room table = cocaine + sneeze.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:30 PM
68: Possibly Tampopo?
MK, did you get to check out those links yet, hmmmm?
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:33 PM
Possibly Tampopo?
Rather, this Sam Lipsyte story in n+1.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 9:42 PM
That's good, too.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 10:05 PM
69: Where does one snort kittens?
Posted by apostropher | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 10:22 PM
('Don't you mean sado-necro-beastiality?' 'Now you're just beating a dead horse.')
ITYM "beating off a dead horse".
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 10:32 PM
Auf zum Zug, Abfall
Posted by Toten-Stein | Link to this comment | 05-16-06 11:41 PM
Those photos should be part of a website called "Steve, Don't F@*k It!".
Posted by M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 05-17-06 10:36 AM
Oh holy hell. I only now clicked on that link since I'm home from work. That's going to give me nightmares now - I won't even touch raw chicken with my hands without gloves because I'm so paranoid about salmonella.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 05-18-06 5:37 PM
58: Has anyone figured out what the hell the joke to that punchline is? Incidentally, I looked it up in the credits to Ill Communication and it's from a Moms Mabley album.
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 05-19-06 10:27 AM
The littel bird that talks to Strasmangelo Jones lies. If I were Strasmangelo Jones, I would look askance at any future little-bird-borne divinations.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 05-20-06 7:42 PM