Re: Miami

1

The moral of the story is going to be that buildings need 37 year recertification, not 40 year.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 5:54 AM
horizontal rule
2

I haven't heard any theories about the cause, which seems odd if only because you'd want to know if it was just that building or in its something that might affect neighboring ones. One obvious theory for an oceanside building collapsing in Miami is water levels somehow affecting the foundation.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 6:44 AM
horizontal rule
3

Terroirism.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
4

Like trained attack dolphins were digging holes under the building?


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
5

3 is great. Too soon, but great.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 7:18 AM
horizontal rule
6

And yet no one talks about all the buildings in Miami that haven't collapsed.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 7:25 AM
horizontal rule
7

My new apartment building is also 40 years old, and needs some seismic upgrades, but it's not nearly as tall and apparently California earthquake standards improved markedly in 1978 so it shouldn't be a death trap at least.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 7:42 AM
horizontal rule
8

2: I think they are looking into it but it will probably take some investigation. There was some speculation about some heavy earth work going on nearby.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
9

2: I think they are looking into it but it will probably take some investigation. There was some speculation about some heavy earth work going on nearby.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
10

I wonder if they used beach sand in the concrete mix.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
11

10. I would be surprised -- I think the sand in Miami is all imported from elsewhere, and has been for ages. It's too expensive to use for concrete.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
12

2 Have they ruled out excessive well pumping that leads to greater salt water intrusion, which, because it's more acidic, breaks down the subsurface limestone?

Ie, have they decided that Florida isn't just plain fucked by climate change?


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 11:12 AM
horizontal rule
13

12. That's been one of the proposed explanations.


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 1:28 PM
horizontal rule
14

I'm waiting for them to blame critical race theory.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
15

WaPo today has an article all about the sea level rise interaction. Too soon to say on this particular case, but it's plausible.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 3:42 PM
horizontal rule
16

Absolutely terrifying.

So the infrastructure just collapses all around us; and we don't know who to blame, from whom to demand accountability... it's just acts of God, I guess; but sending thoughts and prayers to the hapless victims of a de-regulated urban planning regime run by unscrupulous property developers ...


Posted by: Just Plain Jane | Link to this comment | 06-25-21 4:15 PM
horizontal rule
17

Apparently per NYT there was an inspection in 2018 which noted significant foundational issues. Work was being planned. Sounded like some design issues re: water control may have contributed.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-26-21 3:20 AM
horizontal rule
18

14: You won't have to wait long, I suspect.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-26-21 5:22 AM
horizontal rule
19

Why did Governor DeSantis let this happen?


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 06-26-21 7:42 AM
horizontal rule
20

Welcome to Joe Biden's America.


Posted by: The Entire Right Wing Media Ecosystem | Link to this comment | 06-26-21 2:32 PM
horizontal rule
21

Monty Python movies: watch/no-watch?


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 12:18 AM
horizontal rule
22

Holy Grail and Life of Brian were good. Or I liked them when I was younger.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 4:42 AM
horizontal rule
23

Watch.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 5:24 AM
horizontal rule
24

AIUI a large chunk of Miami is built on porous limestone. Sea-level rise is only the beginning of their infrastructure problems.

My last few visits to Miami, I've been repeatedly amazed at the number of high-end condos getting built right on or near beaches. I was exclaiming to a local resident about how on earth these could get insured, and he explained that apparently (I'm paraphrasing) the financial structure is a "hot potato" strategy where an investor agrees to insure the property for 12 months. If something happens during that 12 months, the investor is screwed, because they have to pay out. But if nothing happens, they win big on their gamble, and they just pass the "hot potato" of a policy to the next investor.

Apparently a lot of elite folks from Latin America also use Miami real estate as a place to park their cash, so I guess a portion of these properties are purchased outright with cash and don't have mortgages on them.

Bottom line: I always love visiting Miami, and I always come away deeply worried about the lack of what (to my untrained eye) seem like very basic consumer protections.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 7:00 AM
horizontal rule
25

"History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of man".


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 7:02 AM
horizontal rule
26

Personal boats attract only the highest net-worth inndividuals, and inundation will therefore synergize with the city's business model.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 7:20 AM
horizontal rule
27

My operating assumption is that something like 20% of the real estate in the top 20 destination cities in the world function primarily as vehicles for money laundering.


Posted by: (gensym) | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 7:21 AM
horizontal rule
28

Was channel-hopping the other day, and Life of Brian came on. The station put a written advisory in front of the movie to the effect that Life of Brian is a product of its time, and certain scenes are no longer really appropriate.

I couldn't imagine what they were talking about, but watched a bit and came to this scene where the People's Front of Judea is working out its ideological commitments.

Now the joke here is about leftists or revolutionaries, and not transgender people, but I don't think you can do this scene that way any more.

Holy Grail and Life of Brian are, nonetheless, essential viewing. To geeks of a certain generation, Holy Grail is probably as foundational a document as Lord of the Rings.

And Meaning of Life is great, too.

I'll watch anything directed by Terry Gilliam, although I am compelled to admit that a lot of it isn't very good. Brazil is terrific and Time Bandits is a lot of fun.

Another great Python-adjacent movie: A Fish Called Wanda.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 7:37 AM
horizontal rule
29

On the theme of 24, I have a memory of a post here where the journalist goes to Miami and goes through the motions to buy a half-dozen different pieces of property, and is just agog that no one is mentioning the impending doom of the entire region. Some longform piece also dwelling on the details of the impending doom of the entire region.


Posted by: heebie | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 7:56 AM
horizontal rule
30

Seconding 23


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
31

30 and 28 too


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
32

re: 29

Could be Sarah Miller's piece from a couple years ago.

https://popula.com/2019/04/02/heaven-or-high-water/


Posted by: The Artful Chicken | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
33

I thought the money laundering explanation was pretty plausible, but MattY said in passing on Twitter that it wasn't shown to hold up. He didn't elaborate, though.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:23 AM
horizontal rule
34

Ceviche poops?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
35

YES!! Thank you. Such a beautiful piece of journalism.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
36

35 to 32.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
37

33: This? I think this is just saying that whatever effect it has is localized and much smaller than the NIMBYism found everywhere. This has some Miami specifics.

This is far from the end of the fed's investigations into illicit money in real estate. Recently, Senator Marco Rubio proposed expanding the federal investigation nationwide. Rubio wants shell companies that purchase homes for more than $300,000 anywhere in the United States to disclose their owners, which could include as much as 10 percent of the nation's real estate deals.

I am weirdly on the same page as Rubio. More generally, I think owners and the financials of companies should be public information. I'm entirely spoiled by Companies House here.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
38

32 is a great pseud.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:36 AM
horizontal rule
39

There's certainly some pied-a-terre/laundering condo investment by rich fucks in big cosmopolitan cities. It's rarely in anywhere near enough numbers to explain anything at macro level (e.g., rents). But I could imagine it mattering for certain types of buildings in certain neighborhoods.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:38 AM
horizontal rule
40

I'm assuming the impending doom isn't considered a problem because they intend to get bailed out the way failed real estate rich people get bailed out.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
41

Or that they will sell to a bigger idiot. The collapse of liquidity isn't something people expect. They think it will be a slide where they can take a small loss.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
42

I mean, if it's like the last real estate crash, rich property-owners came out fine in the long term there, unless they were overleveraged. Opportunity to buy low, and now prices are well over the 2000's peak. But yes, sea level rise and attendant collapse is a different kind of risk.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
43

37: That's the one.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 10:26 AM
horizontal rule
44

42: I was thinking of 2008, but the way the bonds collapsed, not the houses.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
45

I am weirdly on the same page as Rubio. More generally, I think owners and the financials of companies should be public information. I'm entirely spoiled by Companies House here.
Yeah, it's weird thinking of the UK as a transparent jurisdiction, but the US is just a total black box when it comes to private companies.


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
46

I used to live in a Miami-type condo outside of Port-of-Spain and it was generally about 75% empty. Rich people buy condos to park cash and show up only on occasion.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
47

High-end condos are getting built at an incredible clip on Oahu. I have no idea who's buying them all but there don't seem to be a lot of lights on at night.


Posted by: DaveLHI | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 4:24 PM
horizontal rule
48

Rich people buying vacation properties they rarely use isn't uncommon, is it?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 4:29 PM
horizontal rule
49

Over the weekend, there was an article about other longstanding issues found during a 2017 inspection and review. It sounds like the roof never drained properly, probably rotting and corroding the posts and columns below it. Even that is hard to believe resulted in so sudden a collapse -- you'd expect more redundancy in the system to give a warning. I'm going to be very interested when the final structural reports come out with their root cause analysis.


Posted by: Mooseking | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 4:35 PM
horizontal rule
50

48: No, but my mind still boggles at the idea that there are so many people with the ability and willingness to drop $1-2 million plus on vacation property.


Posted by: DaveLHI | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 4:41 PM
horizontal rule
51

I've heard income inequality is getting worse.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 4:58 PM
horizontal rule
52

A lot of it just has to be dirty money.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 06-28-21 6:17 PM
horizontal rule
53

My uncle is a senior executive at a very large company and he just bought a fifth house because he stayed in a city for a few months during the pandemic and decided he liked the area so why not buy a house to stay in when he wants to go back.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 06-29-21 1:45 AM
horizontal rule
54

53: maybe I could be allowed to continue working remotely and I could house sit for him.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 06-29-21 1:52 AM
horizontal rule
55

Housing markets shrug off pandemic


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 06-29-21 2:52 AM
horizontal rule
56

Netanyahu is still living in the official Prime-Minister House. Are there no U-Hauls available?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-29-21 4:27 PM
horizontal rule