Re: New Ones!

1

Linquistic innovation is weirdly frowned upon. Groups who use a lot of new words for things, like rappers, valley girls in the '80s and surfers in the '60s, are labeled as stupid. Even perfectly servicable business jargon like "prioritize" is ridiculed.

When words are used for in-group cohesion, people outside the group put the smack-down. I just want to catch people on the flippity-floppy.


Posted by: joe o | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
2

The first paragraph reminds me of Mel Brooks' definitions: tragedy is when I stub my toe, comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
3

After having the big "V', the so-called "minor surgery," I say that "minor surgery" is when it happens to you. When they cut my balls it is MAJOR surgery, baby!


Posted by: Tripp | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
4

Of course I should have used a semicolon, not a comma, between "toe" and "comedy". And in my experience it's not bloggers but, you know, reasonably creative people who are constantly inventing terms. I'll allow that the medium can expedite the sharing, though.

(I'll tell you what I like, is des von bladet's style.)


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:13 PM
horizontal rule
5

How did we get to ball-cutting in just three posts?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:15 PM
horizontal rule
6

Christ, w-lfs-n, you'll be auto-correcting on "whom" next. I say this as a friend and companion in nitpickery: The comma's perfectly appropriate there. "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." Back to ball-cutting.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:16 PM
horizontal rule
7

These are the standards to which I hold myself, Weiner.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:20 PM
horizontal rule
8

Kurt Vonnegut is of the opinion that a semi-colon expresses nothing and is basically never to be used.

So it goes.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:29 PM
horizontal rule
9

He never used one in his writing, I know that much, but did he really think it expressed nothing? If so, he was wrong; I find the semicolon one of the most attractive and compelling members of the punctuational armamentarium.

Poo-tee-weet.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:34 PM
horizontal rule
10

So *that's* what Hegel was doing? And I thought it was just my translation of the PhG.


Posted by: Anderson | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
11

Googlorphans.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:03 PM
horizontal rule
12

101st Fighting Keyboarders.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:12 PM
horizontal rule
13

Language Log is a rich source--check out "eggcorns" and "snowclones," though I'm not sure precisely what they mean by that. (Or rather, what I think they mean isn't what I wish they did.)


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:24 PM
horizontal rule
14

Speaking of ballcutting, you've seen this?


Posted by: Bob | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:33 PM
horizontal rule
15

There's also an eggcorn database. "French benefits" is so much more evocative than "fringe benefits".


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:38 PM
horizontal rule
16

"Douchebags of liberty"


Posted by: Walter Sobchak | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:46 PM
horizontal rule
17

Now as for this semicolon debate, I'm with ben w-lfs-n. The semicolon is a wonderful thing, and its appropriate use can bring a certain je ne sais qua to a sentence; on the other hand, way too many people just don't know how to use it. By the way, I may be inviting scorn on myself by saying this, but I'm also a huge fan of the ellipsis as pause-indicator... you know, for effect. The hyphen just doesn't always get the job done, in my opinion.


Posted by: Walter Sobchak | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
18

my three dots...my supposed original style...real writers will tell you what to think of that!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
19

the three dot elipses should only be used to indicate (a) that something has actually been removed from the writing, or (b) that the writing has a secondary, sexual meaning ... which is what I always infer when I see them, no matter what the context.


Posted by: textualist | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:11 PM
horizontal rule
20

As any colostomy patient will tell you, a semicolon is better than no colon at all.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:11 PM
horizontal rule
21

I know they're supposed to be used that way... I just like using them the other way too. It's like visual onomatopoeia.


Posted by: Walter Sobchak | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
22

But you risk hurting the feelings of those, like myself, who will infer a sexual context when there is none.

I suppose the possibility of a sexual context provides the frisson that keeps us going through monotonous days. I take it back. Keep using elipses in all possible situations.


Posted by: textualist | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
23

That's interesting, textualist. It reminds me: the other day, I went to the...and she said, "Sir, you know it's been a very long time since...," but I'd seen that one coming, so I said, "Madam, have you considered...?" She laughed, a devilish little laugh, and said, "I should introduce you to my...."

Try not to get any on the keyboard, 'k?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
24

oh the endless possibilities that could be contained in those three tiny dots! But what could he have seen coming? But what?

Even better than the titillating frat house banter with profgrrrl. Perhaps now profgrrrl will comment in response, using elipses ...


Posted by: textualist | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
25

That woman you met, ogged, she wasn't the Duchess of G_____ by any chance?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:29 PM
horizontal rule
26

She wasn't a Duchess, no, but she did have..., which is almost as good, you'll grant.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:31 PM
horizontal rule
27

Oh quite.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
28

I enjoyed The Daily Show's Stephen Colbert's coinage, when he said that some administration officials had to obtain a "Writ of Douchebaggery."

Since hearing that, I have attached "-ery" to every possible word, producing, for example, "fucktardery." It's best when used in a phrase like, "Despite his manifest fucktardery...."

That was a non-sexual use of ellipses. I think.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:38 PM
horizontal rule
29

So what you're saying is, you "elided" past the sex?


Posted by: Walter Sobchak | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
30

"That was a non-sexual use of ellipses. I think."

Au contraire.


Posted by: textualist | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:42 PM
horizontal rule
31

So, if I want to proposition women without being accused of sexual harassment, all I have to do is go up and go ... ... ..., whaddya say?

How do you pronounce ... , anyways?

Does .... means it's like extra kinky?

(No, really! It's like this .................................... ! )


ash

['How about Morse ... ?']


Posted by: ash | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
32

If I were gay, and lived in a modern Western democracy with laws based on principles of equality, I would totally marry Stephen Colbert and have his children. He is my non-theological secular humanist personal savior, and Jon Stewart is his prophet.


Posted by: Walter Sobchak | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
33

He's catholic, you know.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:51 PM
horizontal rule
34

Did you see the one where he was talking about bloggers revealing personal secrets and he tried to preempt them by coming out and admitting that he was Hitler's grandson?


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:51 PM
horizontal rule
35

Hmm. Ideally you could proposition a woman without elipses, without being accused of anything. That is, so long as she is not your subordinate and you are not too scary about it.

Interestingly, I think women use the elipses-as-pause more often than men do in e-mail situations, and I think it is because they all secretly want to have sex with me.


Posted by: textualist | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:53 PM
horizontal rule
36

Maybe it's because they all think they're Louis-Ferdinand Celine Dion.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 2:57 PM
horizontal rule
37

Adam:

Yes. That was one of the best ones ever. It's always hilarious when you can tell they're working hard at not completely losing their shit. There was another one like that where Colbert was supposedly "in England," and he was talking about how English aristocrats sound so gay. He just about collapsed from laughing. It was hysterical. Hence, my desire to be his baby's mama, in a totally non-sexual way.


Posted by: Walter Sobchak | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
38

Walter says: "...I'm also a huge fan of the ellipsis as pause-indicator... you know, for effect. The hyphen just doesn't always get the job done, in my opinion."

It's allowable, and has a necessary place, but people should need to get a license to be able to make such use of ellipses. Most people are clearly unqualified and some should be jailed for criminal overuse; as a liberal, I suggest EPA regulation, or possibly OSHA.

What the heck is or are "elipses"? Defter eclipses?


Posted by: Gary Farber | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 3:37 PM
horizontal rule
39

Sort of getting back to the original post topic of neologisms, I want to complain about one that should never have come into existence. Except I don't think it's actually new, just annoying. What's the deal with the word pre-funding? Doesn't it mean exactly the same thing as funding?


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
40

Ellipses is the plural of ellipse, a conic section whose plane is not parallel to the axis, base, or generatrix of the intersected cone. (It's a freakin oval.)


Posted by: bg | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 3:52 PM
horizontal rule
41

Louis-Ferdinand Celine Dion

Oy, that has to get some props. How about HP Laura Croft?


Posted by: r | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 4:19 PM
horizontal rule
42

That of course be Lara


Posted by: r | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 4:20 PM
horizontal rule
43

"Ellipses is the plural of ellipse, a conic section whose plane is not parallel to the axis, base, or generatrix of the intersected cone. (It's a freakin oval.)"

Indeed. Aside from the gramatical usage, there's a not-obscure Ellipse in Washington, D.C. Was someone here unaware of either usage? But an "elipse"? Tsk.


Posted by: Gary Farber | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 5:50 PM
horizontal rule
44

as usual typo editing (not even of grammatical variety) kills the thread. awesome.


Posted by: textualist | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 6:53 PM
horizontal rule
45

Actually, I think it's the next post up that's killed this thread. Ann Coulter can put a damper on anybody's fun. Worthless fucking bitch.


Posted by: Walter Sobchak | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 7:42 PM
horizontal rule
46

elipse.

e-lipse.

lipse. 'He was lipsing.' 'They were lipsing.'

Ok, but what does it mean?

ash

['They were lipsing about the place!']


Posted by: ash | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 8:08 PM
horizontal rule
47

where would Wittgenstein under this reading of Hegel?

(WWWS) what would wittgenstein say?


Posted by: azad | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 10:08 PM
horizontal rule
48

1. Someone already said "neologism," so I don't have to.

2. Back during the all-night boogie known as the Vietnam War it was sufficient to call it THE ESTABLISHMENT PRESS. Rightists know call it something like the main stream media. It's foolish, it's snarky, and worst of all, it's theirs.


Posted by: Josh Narins | Link to this comment | 02-25-05 11:56 PM
horizontal rule
49

1. Methinks that an oval can (must?) have straight sides, whereas an ellipse is round all the way 'round.

2. Daniel Davies has observed somewhere that MSM, the idiot right's favored abbreviation for "mainstream media," has a more longstanding use in epidemiological contexts for "men who have sex with men."

3. I like "craptacular." Maybe Simpsons-originated neologisms don't count.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-26-05 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
50

On (2): I can't believe I didn't see that. I use the old use of MSM in some contexts-- for example, when describing ogged-- and I totally missed it. Damn.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 02-26-05 10:13 AM
horizontal rule
51

I came up with one (with some help from a friendly blogneighbor): precarious pinnacles. You can think of them as the opposite of slippery slopes. With a slippery slope, if you stray from the pure, extreme ideal then you risk gradually slipping away from your original position. With a precarious pinnacle, if you try to maintain the pure, extreme ideal then you risk suddenly falling far away from that position once the extreme version becomes untenable. Being unbending can raise your risk of breaking.

For instance, if you avoid all germs, then that could make you more susceptible to disease because your immune system isn't built up. Other examples involve disillusionment, with religion or with science.

On the more important issue at hand, I think that ovals usually (always?) are round, and that ellipses are ovals.


Posted by: Blar | Link to this comment | 02-26-05 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
52

"Mandatious" (to describe the Bush administration) is another of The Editors' notable contributions to the lexicon.


Posted by: Kriston | Link to this comment | 02-27-05 10:20 PM
horizontal rule
53

I think this might be an interesting verb:

Lydgate (v.t.): to write a negative review of academic work, esp. when a contributing factor to said review is frustration with one's own career.

(After Alaric Lydgate, a character in Barbara Pym's Less Than Angels who is known as a specialist in sarcastic reviews--one of his reviews elicits from the editor the thought "It is a pity to have three consecutive paragraphs beginning 'It is a pity.'")

The problem is that there would never be an occasion to use this verb, because I don't know anyone who would do such a thing.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-28-05 8:30 AM
horizontal rule
54

Oh, my claim about ovals is not that all their sides are straight, but that some are: they have 2-4 straight sides joined by curves. An aerial photo of the oval racetrack at Daytona speedway. The Oval Office does seem to be an ellipse, though. So ellipses are a kind of oval, and bg was originally right.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-28-05 8:37 AM
horizontal rule
55

What about "Patriotically Correct"?

Authorship uncertain.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-28-05 10:53 AM
horizontal rule