Re: I want to play a game!

1

He didn't have his umbrella with him?


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
2

No.

(Is that from a different one? It sounds sort of familiar. Email it to me if it is (but don't tell me what happened!))


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:14 AM
horizontal rule
3

He was disappointed with the abalone?


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
4

I think I've heard this one or a close variant, but I don't know how to be sure unless I ask a question that gives it away. Alas.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
5

Was he a koala?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
6

3: In some sense, I guess you could say yes, but not because it tasted bad.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
7

It was poisoned with a neurotoxin that made him want to kill himself. Something like the parasites in rats that make them unafraid of cats.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
8

Tia, check your email. I think I know this one.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
9

5: no. 7: no. SP, you can email me if you want. Tia@unfogged


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
10

Does his wife/girlfriend/lover work in the restaurant?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:21 AM
horizontal rule
11

10: no.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
12

Tia, my 7 was tongue-in-cheek. I'm spreading disinformation.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
13



This might seem silly, but when you say "shoots himself" do you mean that he killed himself?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:23 AM
horizontal rule
14

I figured, tweedle, esp. since you sent me the right answer, but I'm just going to take everyone seriously on this thread to indicate that the game is very, very serious.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:23 AM
horizontal rule
15

Deadly serious?


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
16

13: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
17

15: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
18

I know! He realized he was illegal carrying his concealed weapon in a bar in Texas, and would rather have died than face the prison rape or whatever that this promised.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
19



Does he have a relevant allergy?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
20

14 -- Woo-hoo! This sounds to me like an explicit license for everybody to dream up the zaniest stuff they can in hopes of penetrating Tia's solemn affect.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
21

Did the abalone taste funny?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
22

he realises everyone else in the restaurant is laughing at him for pronouncing it "abaloney" and his Gatsbyesque attempts to join high society are doomed to failure.


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:28 AM
horizontal rule
23

I've always heard this using albatross instead of abalone, but what restaurant serves friggin' albatross?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:28 AM
horizontal rule
24

18: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:28 AM
horizontal rule
25

21: I'll say yes to that, if by funny you mean, other than what he expected.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
26

21: yes.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
27



Did the funny taste of the abalone indicate a death of importance to him?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
28

27: yes.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
29

He is deathly allergic to seafood, and intended to order "Baloney", but stuttered before the first syllable, so instead they gave him Abalone, which is something he never heard of. After realizing that he just ate seafood, he ponders his options, and decides to shoot himself before the agonizing death by anaphylaxis can occur.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
30



Was the abalone really abalone?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
31

19: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
32

Was the death of importance the death of a human being?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
33

32: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:34 AM
horizontal rule
34

23: Perhaps albatross is served here?


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:34 AM
horizontal rule
35

30: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:34 AM
horizontal rule
36

He did not know he was allergic to seafood and has just shat himself. Honour demands he does the decent thing.


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:35 AM
horizontal rule
37



Did he find a ring, or some other unexpected object, in the abalone?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:35 AM
horizontal rule
38

36: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:35 AM
horizontal rule
39

37: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:36 AM
horizontal rule
40

Was the death of a blood relation?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:36 AM
horizontal rule
41

40: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:36 AM
horizontal rule
42

Wife/lover/etc.?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:37 AM
horizontal rule
43

The man know the person of whose death he was made aware by eating the abalone?


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:37 AM
horizontal rule
44



Was the man dining alone?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:38 AM
horizontal rule
45

Did the man know...


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:38 AM
horizontal rule
46

I think I know, but I don't want to put the answer on the thread. Will email to see if I'm right. Also it reminds me of something in C.S. Lewis's The Silver Chair and also of an SF short story, so Gary Farber ought to have no trouble getting this.


Posted by: emr | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
47

42: no

43: yes, but I just want to say to be careful with the phrases "indicate" and "made aware." I said yes to a question with "indicate" and I'd say yes to "made aware."


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
48

Did he shoot himself out of unhappiness?

Dammit, I have to go soon, and I will be off the 'net most of the day. Andrew, I'm counting on you.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
49

Does this have to do with SCUBA?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
50

46- was the abalone in the shape of Jesus and he had three bites before his sin was revealed?


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
51

46: You've got it.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:41 AM
horizontal rule
52

49: no, that's a different one, Cala, and also a good one. next friday, maybe.

50: no

48: yes

44: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:42 AM
horizontal rule
53

Speaking of games, there was a cool interview (for those of us in/who-used-to-be-in the tech field in Make magazine this month. Here's a copy.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:42 AM
horizontal rule
54

Does it matter that it was abalone specifically? Does it matter that it was a crustacean?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
55

Had he known about the death before eating the abalone?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:44 AM
horizontal rule
56



Was the different taste of the abalone one associated with the person who had died while the person was living?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:45 AM
horizontal rule
57

Was his lover a changeling that turned into abalone?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:45 AM
horizontal rule
58



I'm completely at sea on this one Matt


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:45 AM
horizontal rule
59

54: Not just any food would have made him shoot himself no, but you could set this up with a different kind of food.

Also, emr, got it, so props to him (her)?


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:45 AM
horizontal rule
60

Did he shoot himself out of unhappiness that a particular person had died?


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:46 AM
horizontal rule
61



Isn't there some rule forbidding the use of C.S. Lewis novels in these games?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:46 AM
horizontal rule
62

Did he expect bad consequences if he continued to live?

(I'm assuming that 48 means that it is not the case that he had murdered someone, and the taste of the abalone somehow indicated that they had begun to fish the grotto where he had disposed of the body, and so he would soon be found out.)


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:47 AM
horizontal rule
63

55: yes

56: if I'm parsing that right, no.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:47 AM
horizontal rule
64

This is kind of reminding me of a story, I'm trying to dig it out of the cesspool of my memory, a man -- I think he is Greek? Brings a guest into his house, the guest (he doesn't recognize him) bears a longstanding animus toward the host, and contrives to kill the host's children and serve them to him at a banquet. Host eats his children thinking they are non-human animal product, then discovers hsi mistake and kills himself in a frenzy of grief. But it does not quite fit because there is no restaurant or firearms in the original. though there may have been abalone -- I do nt remember.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:48 AM
horizontal rule
65

60, no.

62: yes, but there are lots of different kinds of "bad consequences."


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:48 AM
horizontal rule
66

64: Osner, is thre a question in there?


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
67

64: That's Titus Andronicus, and whatever source material it came from.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
68



Aren't abalone herbivores?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
69

Did he shoot himself out of remorse?

Had he killed the person whose death we have been talking about?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
70

68: I don't know, but not relevant.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
71

69.1: yes

69.2: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:51 AM
horizontal rule
72

66 -- the implicit question was extraneous to this thread and was ably answered by LizardBreath.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
73

Did the man realize he was really Charlie the Tuna and had just eaten the Little Mermaid?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
74

54- Abalone is a crustacean? It's not a fish? Um... I think I need some time to myself- goodbye, everyone.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
75

Did the abalone (taste of) remind him of the death?

Did it make him aware that he had caused the death?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
76

73: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
77



Did the abalone taste funny because of the way they were prepared?

Did the abalone taste funny because something was added to them?

Did the abalone taste funny because of where they were harvested?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:54 AM
horizontal rule
78

Isn't that the source of the curse on the house of Atreus?


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:54 AM
horizontal rule
79

Did helearn something by eating the abalone?


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:55 AM
horizontal rule
80

Isn't that the source of the curse on the house of Atreus?


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:55 AM
horizontal rule
81

75.1 yes

75.2 no

77: no to all


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
82

79: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
83



Did the taste of the abalone restore a memory he had lost?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
84

83: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
85

The abalone made him recall where lay the Snowdens of yesteryear.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
86



Would the abalone have tasted funny to someone else?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
87

86: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
88



Had the man been eating something earlier that he believed to be abalone, and has now discovered to have been something else?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
89

Was he previously aware that the dead person was dead?


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
90

I feel like I'm interviewing with Microsoft.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
91

78: Yes

80: No


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
92

When there was only one set of footprints, was he carrying the abalone?


Posted by: Ted Barlow | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
93

Is there a clue in the word "abalone"?


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:06 AM
horizontal rule
94

89: yes

88:yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
95

93: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
96

92: The abalone was riding him.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
97

Also, the version of this set up I learned years ago has the protagonist going into a restaurant and ordering a platypus sandwich.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
98

Had he killed the dead person?


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
99



And was that someone else a loved one?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
100



Something else, I mean.


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
101

78 -- thanks, yes. I am thinking of the story of Tantalus and Pelops, and getting it backwards into the deal. However it may be that Titus Andronicus occured more as aI am misremembering the story of Tantalus and Pelops.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
102

98: no

99: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
103

Had the dead person died recently?


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:12 AM
horizontal rule
104



Did the man find what he had thought to be abalone in the ocean?


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:13 AM
horizontal rule
105



Had the man found, that is.


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
106

103: Not that relevant. I'll say yes.

104: no


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
107



Was the man served what he had thought to be abalone at someone's home?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
108

107: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
109



Well, I've run out of time. But...

Was the pseudo-abalone served to the man by anyone?

Does the man own the restaurant?

Was the man previously served what he had thought to be abalone at this restaurant? At another restaurant?

Does the man's wife own the restaurant where the pseudo-abalone was served?

Does the husband of the man's lover own the restaurant where the pseudo-abalone was served?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:20 AM
horizontal rule
110

109.1: yes

.2: no

.3: no

.4: no

.5: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:22 AM
horizontal rule
111

Is what he ate immediately before he shot himself abalone?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:22 AM
horizontal rule
112

111: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
113



Was the pseudo-abalone served to the man in a prison?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
114

No


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
115

114 to 113.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:25 AM
horizontal rule
116



Was the pseudo-abalone consumed by the man while stranded somewhere?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:25 AM
horizontal rule
117

Had he thought that abalone was a fish before he ordered it?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:26 AM
horizontal rule
118

116: yes

117: no, he knows abalone is shellfish.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:28 AM
horizontal rule
119

Does he kill himself out of grief?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
120

59: Yay! I have to say, though, I didn't do what others are doing and patiently tease out the supporting reasons why that must be the answer. I just assumed we'd be shown the chain of logic later.


Posted by: emr | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
121

119: among other things, sure


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
122

I've heard this before as part of a great story in the Granta food issue.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:32 AM
horizontal rule
123



:) emr unbound


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:32 AM
horizontal rule
124

120: well, if you can guess it by intuiting, that's great. The goal is to figure out the answer, not to ask as many questions as possible. I think Andrew basically knows the whole story at this point, so we can give him some number 2 props. Poor Weiner, I feel bad he had to leave. Maybe we should schedule the next one.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:32 AM
horizontal rule
125



You could delete the comment thread and let Weiner & others have a shot later, no?


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
126

I don't want to delete the thread, but I could put up a new one and warn people away from this one. Okay, I'll put a warning in the post.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
127

When he shoots himself, does he do so to ward off an even more unpleasant death?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:39 AM
horizontal rule
128

127: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
129

I think I know the basic answer also; just not every detail of the circumstances.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
130

Is the man intoxicated (or otherwise druggily mood-altered) at any point in the course of the story? E.g., at the end when he kills himself?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
131

Had the man earlier been served a strange dish by someone who might have murdered his child, and been told it was abalone?

Had he eaten it with relish?


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
132

131: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
133

131: I mean "enjoyment," rather than "relish". Relishes would not in the circumstances improve the story. "I ate my baby with mayonnaise" adds little to a mood of tragedy.


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
134

Andrew -- do you mean pickle relish or onion relish?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
135

Pwned


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:45 AM
horizontal rule
136

I don't know what abalone looks like, but this is unfogged. Are we working towards a cock joke?


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:46 AM
horizontal rule
137

Did the man realize he'd been pwned?


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:46 AM
horizontal rule
138

I think I sort of have the idea.

Does he kill himself because what he ate earlier wasn't abalone?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:47 AM
horizontal rule
139

did the man suppose he had eaten any relative, or portion of a relative, when he shot himself.


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:47 AM
horizontal rule
140

138: yes

139: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
141

Got it! As he was eating the abalone, in a sudden flash of revelation he came to understand the meaning of existence, and his place in the universe. And realized that holding such knowledge made him unfit to continue to exist.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
142

141:no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:50 AM
horizontal rule
143

136: always.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:50 AM
horizontal rule
144

(abalone sb abalone)


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:50 AM
horizontal rule
145

Was the un-abalone a human part?


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
146

Did the man realize he had eaten a human being earlier, supposing it to be abalone?


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:52 AM
horizontal rule
147

145: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:53 AM
horizontal rule
148

Okay, got it more or less I think. I feel there's a pop culture/literature reference I should be getting in a flash of insight, but I'm not.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
149

146: yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
150

Since I haven't a clue about the puzzle, I'll lead off in the other direction. Is it true Pacific Abolone must measure 7 inches or they must be thrown back?


Posted by: John Tingley | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
151

Was it someone he knew?

Was it part of himself?

Did he cause the person's death and not know it, until eating the actual abalone made him realize the chain of events?


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
152

136, 143 -- You could say we are laboring Sisyphus-like toward a cock joke.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
153

Can 145 and 146 both be true? I mean, did he eat a whole human?

If not, was the bit of the human important?

In other words, is this a long-winded cock joke?


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:57 AM
horizontal rule
154

If this is a cock joke, the German cannibal who ate the guy's cock said it was tough. You'd expect that. My suggestion is that you use a recipe for tongue, which as I recall requires marinating and / or pounding.

Or, of course, the recipe for this. (Picture courtesy of The Valve; the valve is on the right).


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:57 AM
horizontal rule
155

marinating, pounding, tongues ... is the world ready for the Mineshaft cookbook?


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
156

Heh -- John said 'pounding'.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
157

In other news, who is Andrew Brown and why is he stealing all my thunder?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:01 AM
horizontal rule
158

said it was tough. You'd expect that.

Depending on the source, that is.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:01 AM
horizontal rule
159

I guess the answering questions portion of the thread is over.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:05 AM
horizontal rule
160

What, it's only 10-15 minutes since her last answer -- cut a little slack huh?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
161

FEED ME TIA


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:08 AM
horizontal rule
162

Who is that command directed toward, Joe?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:10 AM
horizontal rule
163

Just keeping with the theme.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
164

151.1: yes

151.2: no

151.3: no


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
165

It's an advantage to be many timezones away, so I can knock off work and pay here with a clear conscience.


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
166

I can tell you this: Andrew Brown is not my brother of the same name, but reading his name here is disconcerting every damn time.


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:12 AM
horizontal rule
167

Andrew Brown is not "Andrew Brown", but another commenter of the same name.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
168

Thanks tweedle. I had to go make some copies, sorry.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
169

oh fuck. unveiled. pwned I mean. whoever I am.


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
170

Dude! I've heard good things about your "Darwin Wars."


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:18 AM
horizontal rule
171

[redacted]


Posted by: [redacted] | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:39 AM
horizontal rule
172

He's been commenting here for a year.


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
173

Labs is cock(joke)-blocked!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:03 PM
horizontal rule
174

tia -- this may be obvious by now but I am particularly dense and at sea. Did the man kill himself because after tasting the restaurant's abalone, he came to understand that the stuff he had eaten previously was not abalone? I don't see how just knowing that something you had eaten previously was not what you thought it was, would be reason to go to such lengths. Did realizing that it had not been abalone somehow carry with it an understanding of what it had in fact been, and that was something gross enough to inspire suicide?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:24 PM
horizontal rule
175

Did the man kill himself because after tasting the restaurant's abalone, he came to understand that the stuff he had eaten previously was not abalone?

yes

Did realizing that it had not been abalone somehow carry with it an understanding of what it had in fact been, and that was something gross enough to inspire suicide?

yes.

I only answer yes or no questions, Osner. If you want to know without playing, reading the thread carefully should explain this to you, but I'm happy to keep on answering questions, because I live to serve the Unfoggetariat.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:31 PM
horizontal rule
176

I live to serve the Unfoggetariat.

It's really distracting when you say things like this, Tia. Please be considerate-- I have to get some work done.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:34 PM
horizontal rule
177

I'm sure we could figure out a way for you to mullti-task, Labs.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
178

So: at the risk of making you repeat above answers which I did not understand, was the thing which he had eaten previously thinking it was abalone, a human body part? Separate question: did the person who served him the thing under discussion intentionally mislead him into thinking that thing was abalone?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:45 PM
horizontal rule
179

at the risk of making you repeat above answers which I did not understand, was the thing which he had eaten previously thinking it was abalone, a human body part?

yes

did the person who served him the thing under discussion intentionally mislead him into thinking that thing was abalone?

yes


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
180

The man had been tricked into eating his child or other loved one, thinking it was abalone. Having eating abalone, he realized what had happened and shot himself.


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
181

This has begun to remind me of another thread.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
182

This is tiring... what time will the answer be posted?


Posted by: Urple | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
183

180: no to child. That's basically it but there's slightly more to the scenario that Andrew teased out.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
184

Right? Did I miss something?

It doesn't completely make sense.


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
185

Was the person who served him the human body part and led him to belive it was abalone, responsible for the death of the person who the body part used to belong to?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
186

185: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
187

"no" s/b "yes"


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
188

What? No it shouldn't. Man you guys are getting testy.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
189

Just yankin yer chain


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
190

Tia, the only question left is whether it was his own. But in that case he might, you know, have noticed.

OK -- so he comes round after the accident and is served a special meal. Is that right?

In Thailand there were all these jokes about "feeding the ducks" a few years ago.


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
191

I'm guessing the man is recently back from being, um, Lost.

But this is still a pretty stupid puzzle, because the backstory which I'm guessing forms the right answer isn't well-enough connected to the events in the puzzle. Boo hiss.


Posted by: argle | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
192

190: No, it wasn't his own.

191: The first sentence of 191 is more or less right, but the rest of it is the sharper that a serpent's tooth ingratitude of a blog reader. You only come to understand an Ogged until you've blogged a mile in his shoes. I hate you all.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:32 PM
horizontal rule
193

After the guy shoots himself, does the waiter then say, "I've seen other customers react badly when I bring them the wrong dish, but damn!!!"


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
194

183: Well, is there enough of a twist that it will be worth fifty more of these questions? Because I don't see a lot of cock jokes.


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:51 PM
horizontal rule
195

He woke up one day without his penis. Thinking it would show up eventually, he went down to breakfast where his friend served him what he said was abalone, and he loved it.

Days later, still hoping that his penis would show up somewhere sooner or later, he decided to have abalone again. But it didn't taste right at all, and suddenly it dawned on him what he had eaten.

But rather than trying to figure out a different source for tasty penii, as a rational person would ahve done, he gave up on life.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
196

193: no

194: Well, you should understand why someone would have served him human flesh and called it abalone, which has mostly been answered. The story is improbable, but it's not nonsensical.

195: no


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
197

I live to serve the Unfoggetariat.

That was a Damon Knight reference?


Posted by: Michael H Schneider | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:56 PM
horizontal rule
198

I knew you guys were Unfoggets.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:58 PM
horizontal rule
199

197: It had multiple functions.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
200

Can I ask questions to help them along, given that, as mentioned above, I've previously heard a version of this?


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:01 PM
horizontal rule
201

196: I'm totally not buying that, eating abalone and thinking it tastes different from the abalone he ate last time, he jumps to the conclusion that the last time had actually been human flesh. There are any number of alternate explanations for the difference in flavor -- perhaps the one last time was going off, or had been prepared poorly. FTM why couldn't the previous one be abalone and this one be human flesh/whatever? Rather than shooting himself he could complain to the chef, "This tastes nothing like abalone! What are you guys, trying to sell me some weak imitation abalone?! I demand a refund! Whaddaya think, I'm a cannibal?"


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:01 PM
horizontal rule
202

I'm having the same leap-of-faith problems that Jeremy describes in 201.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
203

Okay, okay: I have a new story in mind. Same set up, I'm answering questions.

17 - yes

19 - no

43 - yes

46 - yes

47 - no

53 - yes, yes, and no

74 - definitely no

114 - of course

116 - no

118 - yes

123 - no

Okay now figure out the answer.


Posted by: Urple | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:04 PM
horizontal rule
204

I was expecting a puzzle more of the "what color is the bear" variety -- a one-line answer that explains the whole situation.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:04 PM
horizontal rule
205

We could also play "Animal, Vegetable, Genital".


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
206

Or "Rock, Paper, Genital" -- that might be fun.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
207

201, 202: Maybe he already had buried suspicions, and eating the abalone was confirming something he hadn't wanted to face previously.

Washerdreyer, go for it. there's not much mystery left at this point.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
208

D'oh! I mean of course, "Cock, Paper, Scissors".


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
209

Did an accident, possibly a transportation accident, lead to him being stranded somewhere? (I know stranded was mentioned, but it's been sort of dropped)

Did he suffer any dimunition of his senses in the accident?


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:12 PM
horizontal rule
210

208: In that game, doesn't "scissors" win every time?


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
211

Urple -- many of your answers are not to questions. Is this intentional?


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
212

211: Goddammit, Osner, don't give it away already. Some of us are still trying to figure it out.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
213

209.1 yes

209.2 actually, no, not in my version. I always pictured the captain just keeping what he was doing a secret. But that would work too.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
214

211- well, not to obvious questions perhaps. But all of life is a question on some level or another. My game is not as easy as Tia's.


Posted by: Urple | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
215

Wait, is this a plotline from a TV show??


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
216

210 -- think about it -- I'm pretty sure you would win if you threw "Cock" and your opponent threw the open hand which represents "Paper". Paper covers cock but this is not at all a bad thing for the cock -- indeed it is win-win.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
217

215: Not that I know of. In fact, I could tell you something funny about who I got this game from, except that would be a Tia Indiscretion Error at my own expense.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:22 PM
horizontal rule
218

216 - okay, so paper-cock is win-win. But I think MAE's point still stands: scissors win every time.


Posted by: Urple | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
219

218 -- all depends what you're into I guess.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
220

Jeremy are you claiming your cock would win a battle with a pair of scissors?


Posted by: Urple | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:27 PM
horizontal rule
221

The cock could practice assymetric warfare and disappear into a dark crevice.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
222

No I'm just sayin. The enlightened player of Cock, Paper, Scissors will go for the maximum payback, which is available by throwing paper or cock rather than scissors.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:30 PM
horizontal rule
223

Paper covers cock but this is not at all a bad thing for the cock -- indeed it is win-win.

Depends on the paper. Flypaper? Sandpaper?

Also, in games of this sort, when both players throw the same thing, it is generally considered a draw. But what about when both players choose cock? Win-win? Lose-lose? Win-lose? Is hand-stretching allowed?


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:34 PM
horizontal rule
224

Flypaper? Sandpaper?

Neither -- it is rather a fleshy simulacrum of paper.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:42 PM
horizontal rule
225

But what about when both players choose cock?

Then comes the penis fencing.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
226

Hello? Supply room? This is Mr. Alter Ego on the 5th floor. Can you order us a couple of reams of fleshy simulacrum paper? Bill it to Marketing. Thanks.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:48 PM
horizontal rule
227

Could the man, in fact, taste the abalone?


Posted by: greg | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:53 PM
horizontal rule
228

Whoa, someone's still playing? Yes, he could taste it.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:54 PM
horizontal rule
229

If I am not mistaken, and I haven't googled to find out, abalone look a lot like pussy.

Therefore, I conclude that the man had been shipwrecked on a desert island with his wife, lover, girlfriend, whatever, and had survived b/c she served him "abalone."


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:55 PM
horizontal rule
230

Whoa.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:57 PM
horizontal rule
231

B, you need to shave.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
232

Part of you looks like that? Are you sure?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
233

Now that would be sastisfactory twist.


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
234

apostrophowned.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
235

Therefore, I conclude that the man had been shipwrecked on a desert island with his wife, lover, girlfriend, whatever, and had survived b/c she served him "abalone."

And the man had sold his pocketwatch to buy her a hairbrush, right?

Oh, wait. Different story. Sorry.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
236

[redacted]


Posted by: [redacted] | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:06 PM
horizontal rule
237

Now the thread is over

I'm so tired

Then I see you coming

Out of nowhere

Much communication in a motion

Without conversation or a notion

Abalone


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:07 PM
horizontal rule
238

I'm gonna defend B on this one.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:08 PM
horizontal rule
239

You know, I could be wrong. And I have no idea how one small meal would save a man's life, or how it is that he wouldn't have recognized the mutilation after they were rescued.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:08 PM
horizontal rule
240

238: That pussy doesn't look so healthy.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
241

Apo, stop oppressing B.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:13 PM
horizontal rule
242

I have to wonder if no one's having guessed that before me means that the men here have never seen pussy, or that they've never eaten shellfish.

And, apo., how about this one? The one on the left is diseased; on the right, healthy.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:13 PM
horizontal rule
243

I would if I could, Tia. I would if I could.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:13 PM
horizontal rule
244

Oh I know. Mike and Jenny are GOLDFISH.


Posted by: j. | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
245

the men here have never seen pussy

Of course not. If you look directly at one, you'll turn to stone.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:15 PM
horizontal rule
246

That's it, this blog relationship is over.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
247

You have to use one of those pinhole things, like when there's a eclipse.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:19 PM
horizontal rule
248

Or perhaps a welding mask.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:20 PM
horizontal rule
249

You have to use one of those pinhole things, like when there's a eclipse.

You can also use a webcam.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:22 PM
horizontal rule
250

Perhaps. I haven't been willing to chance it since I caught a sideways glance at one and felt the hardening process begin. Luckily, it went away.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:22 PM
horizontal rule
251

For the record, it was not his wife's pussy that he ate. I mean, at some point he probably at his wife's pussy, but she never called it abalone. It was a shipmate of his who died in the shipwreck. The captain cooked up the body on the other side of the island and called it "abalone."


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:23 PM
horizontal rule
252

I like my version better.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
253

it was not his wife's pussy that he ate

There was another woman on the boat?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
254

And you could add in that he'd never seen pussy before the shipwreck, since, after all, he *was* a sailor.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
255

This may be a silly question, but does this scenario strike anyone as even remotely psychologically plausible? Is there any record of suicidal remorse among survivor-cannibals?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
256

A sailor with a webcam.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
257

Well, there are people who have starved to death *rather* than engage in cannibalism, so it's not *entirely* implausible. The proper question would be, is there any record of suicidal remorse among *unwitting* survivor-cannibals?


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:27 PM
horizontal rule
258

Shiver me timbers, Apostropher!

That isn't particularly relevant or funny, but it's fun to say.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:28 PM
horizontal rule
259

I think we're paring it down to a pretty small sample population. The standard error on this is going to be enormous.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:28 PM
horizontal rule
260

Oh, but to be sure it follows a power-law function.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
261

but it's fun to say

Shiver me timbers, Apostropharrrrr!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
262

I shivered his timber just last night.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
263

Well, there are people who have starved to death *rather* than engage in cannibalism

Oh, yeah, but now the buckshot is already in his face, as it were.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
264

So why did he bring his gun to the restaurant?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-17-06 11:40 PM
horizontal rule
265

In case the abalone turned out to be somthing other than what he had been served before.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-18-06 12:36 AM
horizontal rule
266

Because he was a survivalist.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-18-06 12:44 AM
horizontal rule
267

Because he had just turned 40, and weight of the gun pressed reassuringly against his ribs as he sat at the table and ordered abalone and a shot of McKendrick, straight up.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 02-18-06 12:49 AM
horizontal rule
268

No, I don't understand why he shot himself either. I mean, it's not gay if you eat it with a knife and fork.


Posted by: Andrew Brown | Link to this comment | 02-18-06 2:01 AM
horizontal rule
269

Doesn't it depend on whether the knife is a 2 1/2 inch butter knife with a floral pattern handle, or a more manly 2 pound meat cleaver? Doing it to the hilt isn't as meaningful with a short blade. Good knives have more tang, even if you use apostrophes in dialect: butt'r.


Posted by: Michael H Schneider | Link to this comment | 02-18-06 11:19 PM
horizontal rule