Re: Saturday miscellany

1

it's a tie.


Posted by: TomFreeland | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 12:23 PM
horizontal rule
2

Speaking of the Human League, can we acknowledge the massively overlooked potential for peace involved in re-releasing "The Lebanon"?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 12:32 PM
horizontal rule
3

Hanging out in the commode
listening to Depatch Mode
you look like some kind of toad
why are you a moron?

I win!

Shit, I had no idea one of them had died.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
4

There is some serious guitar face going on in the Zeppelin picture. I'm counting it as more embarrassing for that reason.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
5

Tie, my ass. Any band that is half formed by shopgirls from Tesco's can only aspire to the genius that permits the bass player to have this haircut.


Posted by: shpx.ohfu | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
6

Could be worse, Abu. I was "rocking" out to this guy.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:08 PM
horizontal rule
7

Look, seriously, the correct answer is that Depeche Mode and the Human League are objectively more embarrassing than Zeppelin. Zeppelin could swing, DM and HL could not.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:09 PM
horizontal rule
8

Don't be an ass, slol. I still listen to DM occassionally. And there simply is something appealing about HL. OTOH, Zeppelin is at least half-responsible for my early adoption of Republican politics.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:12 PM
horizontal rule
9

Wrong. Zeppelin is way more embarrassing, largely because it's such a high school stoner boy cliche.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
10

Depeche Mode is in every way embarrassing. Led Zeppelin is objectively good and innovative but still fucking embarrassing, and would have been a million times better if Robert Plant had been replaced by Lemmy. Human League is kind of fun, and 2/3 of them look reasonable. Plus they were on an early label with Gang of Four and the Mekons. I call DM averaged with HL less embarrassing on points.

Plus rocking out to Led Zeppelin now, I mean, do you have a graying ponytail?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:17 PM
horizontal rule
11

Zeppelin's a good band, with a lot of objectively good songs. And the woman in the red polka-dots is hot. I think you're ok, either way. It was all Doors all the time for me in the teenage years, though.

And I resent you muslimizing Gibson's name in light of his anti-semitism. I'll be over to cut off your fingers later.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:19 PM
horizontal rule
12

Weiner and I both call Zeppelin "objectively good." I find this odd and disturbing.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:22 PM
horizontal rule
13

And slol, what does "could swing" have to do with rock bands? If you want "could swing" listen to Basie.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:23 PM
horizontal rule
14

Dear god, I'm hanging out with men who listen to the Doors and Led Zeppelin. It's like high school all over again. I'm going to go put on some Prince or New Order and paint the goddamn bedroom.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:24 PM
horizontal rule
15

BTW, congratulations to Senator Lamont.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
16

It was all Doors all the time for me in the teenage years, though.

You must have been a barrel of laughs. I find distortion disturbing (sincerely), and blame Zepplin for the amount of it you used to find around.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:29 PM
horizontal rule
17

what does "could swing" have to do with rock bands

My dear child, rock-n-roll requires swing, as in, playing ahead or behind the count, so that you don't get that INCREDIBLY ANNOYING dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun that you hear through the wall when some coke-addled doofus is listening to Depeche Mode in the dorm room next door.

Anyway, I don't listen to Zeppelin anymore because they're too reactionary to be on iTunes. And I'm an iTunes addict.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:33 PM
horizontal rule
18

Is the claim that the Ramones could swing? I feel this is a non-standard definition of 'swing'.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
19

And, you're not helping your case on the "I am not a hippie" question.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:38 PM
horizontal rule
20

what bitch said in 9, plus Led Zepplin has a lot more to answer for (as an influence). so i stay with what i said-- a tie.

and what is this "rock bands swing" stuff? in the sense of sledgehammers swinging? when little richard and earl palmer and others were "inventing" rock and roll it was all about hitting those beats dead on and hard.

(swinging is more about playing triplets and other units of three against quarter and eighth notes and other units of four, both providing and implying complex meter. It gets even more complex (5 beats against 4, etc). Playing just before or just behind the beat might simulate swing but no better than that)

oh, well. i still say 'tie'


Posted by: tomfreeland | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:46 PM
horizontal rule
21

I'd forgotten I ever claimed not to be a hippie. But I'm pretty sure I'm not. I never really had a Zeppelin phase, though there's some Zeppelin I like. In the 1980s, I listened to the Police, Blondie, Tom Petty, the Housemartins, and the Violent Femmes, as well as some slightly weird R&B choices.

Swing.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:50 PM
horizontal rule
22

you could possibly redeem yourself with the "slightly weird R&B choices", slolernr


Posted by: TomFreeland | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:51 PM
horizontal rule
23

Waves of derisive laughter, Bruce.

"Trampled under foot". Greatest Zep song.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
24

Dude, I made no claim of particular taste in music. I have probably got the squarest tastes here. And as for "weird", I meant only for white suburban persons. So, Wilson Pickett, Booker T & the MGs, and some Stax miscellany.

Also, I probably don't mean "swing". I probably mean, "any rhythm more complex than dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun". I hated that guy.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:54 PM
horizontal rule
25

Oh, and also, for some reason, I did like Lou Reed, and played New Sensations constantly.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 1:56 PM
horizontal rule
26

by weird r&b, i thought maybe you meant something like Esquerita


Posted by: TomFreeland | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
27

No, that would have been cool.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:04 PM
horizontal rule
28

I have probably got the squarest tastes here.

Doubt it.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
29

Square-off!


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
30

Actually, I based that suggestion on the long-ago pop-music thread, which I'm not going to bother to google up, since google seems not to work very well anymore with this site.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
31

You need to talk to the site's resident gearheads about getting google to reindex those archived threads. In the meanwhile, Yahoo's site search seems to be pretty good.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
32

Huh. I started reading that thread, and didn't even recognize my own comments. I don't even recognize the references I was making. I may not be a hippie, but I'm old, man.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
33

I think that there is a Hebrew or Arabic word that sounds like "hareth," and means something like "foresworn, because it is unclean." But I've never been able to figure out if the word exists, or is a figment of my fevered imagination. In any case, assuming there is such a word, Yahoo is it.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
34

I do not understand this strange definition of 'swing' which is applied to rock music. I don't think Benny, Artie or Glenn would approve.


Posted by: winna | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:29 PM
horizontal rule
35

Cripes. I still don't understand ogged's point from that earlier pop thread. I think he and w-lfs-n have "authenticity" issues and authenticity issues; it's probably why they work as a couple.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:31 PM
horizontal rule
36

SCMT: Haram? Anyway, Yahoo doesn't work great either, or I would've looked for this. Of course, once I tried Yahoo it worked.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
37

Oh, well, in that context, I am definitely not a hippie.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
38

36: Yeah! You rule, Weiner. I've wondered about that for years.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
39

I saw LZ once, mid-70s. I'm not sure 'swing' is a term I'd use, but the acoustic set was definitely better and spacier than I'd expected.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 2:56 PM
horizontal rule
40

Page's black silk pajama outfit was objectively cool, as was Jones' futuristic looking stand-up bass for the acoustic set.

I can see, though, that anyone who could ever find any of that 80s crap appealing might be embarrassed by association with 70s stuff . . .


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:03 PM
horizontal rule
41

My god, you people are older than I am.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:05 PM
horizontal rule
42

Carp, aren't you into the Dead?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:08 PM
horizontal rule
43

Ogged, I should have known that a man whose adolescence was characterized by a deep emotional attachment to Epictetus would
(a) like the Doors, that godawful nonrocking also-ran in the poetry slam that was the late sixties;
(b) fail to realize that it's Gibson's beard, not his anti-semitism, that earned him a remixed name.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:10 PM
horizontal rule
44

Also, slol,
Look, seriously, the correct answer is that Depeche Mode and the Human League are objectively more embarrassing than Zeppelin. Zeppelin could swing, DM and HL could not.

Weirdly, I just had an hour-long conversation with a rhythm theorist [sic] about this-- playing in the pocket is impossible with the kinds of electronics that DM were using throughout the 80s, so everything was totally square. That's a lot of what gives the music its kind of jarring anti-groove, esp. compared to the Big Rock it was competing with.

I should also say, and I'm completely serious about this, that Depeche Mode is much, much better than The Human League. My case rests on the excellence of Black Celebration, Music for the Masses, and possibly Violator. Seriously, listen to the orchestration on Black Celebration-- that's some complicated (and interesting) stuff. Does The Human League have anything to say? Oh, what's that, a song in funny dialogue form? Thanks for showing up, guys, but there's no contest here.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:17 PM
horizontal rule
45

Also, Ogged, the stars fall from the sky, for you and I. Love ya, dawg.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:19 PM
horizontal rule
46

The Gibson story is just plain weird. How many bigots do you know - even very drunk bigots - who just start randomly spouting off about "those damn Jews" apropos of nothing? Don't even raving antisemites need a segue?


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:19 PM
horizontal rule
47

Labs, you just cited "complicated and interesting" orchestration as a reason for thinking that Depeche Mode is a better rock band than the Human League.

WANKER.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
48

FL, what is "playing in the pocket"? is that another way of saying "swinging"? Also, are the Human League the perpetrators of "Don't You Want Me Baby"?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
49

Labs, you ignorant wanker, if you're going to make fun of the Doors, you need to pick something other than one of the few songs not written by Morrison.

The Lizard King pwns!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:42 PM
horizontal rule
50

Clown,

"Playing in the pocket" is what Ogged is doing while I'm busy enjoying w-lfs-n's mom.

Ogged,

I'm so sorry, I didn't realize that making fun of the Doors requires making fun of some proper subset of their songs. Really, though, I don't think you want to defend many of those lyrics, so I'll focus instead on that gay-ass keyboard playing. WTF? Father, I want to kill you! Mother, I want to play you this little calypso number I just wrote!


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 3:53 PM
horizontal rule
51

More seriously, Clownae,

(a) the Human League did indeed give us "Don't you want me," and
(b) "playing in the pocket" has a couple of meanings. Narrowly, it's playing the 2nd and 4th beats a little later than the metronome says. (A lot of what feels and sounds natural and right is not exactly in time, and being exactly on the beat can feel kind of weird.)

The earlier-mentioned theorist claimed that Bruce Hornsby's sound is really distinct because he's always right on the beat, instead of behind it.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 4:06 PM
horizontal rule
52

I would like everyone to notice that Labs, who actually knows something about music, essentially vindicated my ignorant and arbitrary comment. Thank you.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
53

The great Doors song: "Horse Latitudes" (aka "Mut Nostril Agony" or "Sullen and Aborted Currents" or "Conspires in Armor.")


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 4:13 PM
horizontal rule
54

Matt, people are people, so why should it be/ that you and I should get along so aw-ful-y?

Wow, they really are lame sometimes.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 4:24 PM
horizontal rule
55

He promises me I'm as safe as houses, as long as I remember who's wearing the trousers.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 4:52 PM
horizontal rule
56

42 -- Depends on what the meaning of is is.

I'm not embarrassed to have seen LZ. Can't say the same about the other acts on the same bill: Judas Priest & Rick Derringer. Ugh. Found a picture from the show, but you can't see how cool Page's outfit is.

I've seen the Big Sky Mudflaps a bunch more than Zep: that's swing.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 5:54 PM
horizontal rule
57

Wrong damn picture.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
58

I think I am getting Depeche Mode mixed up with Tears for Fears.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 6:16 PM
horizontal rule
59

Clownhead, you are so fucking banned.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 7:25 PM
horizontal rule
60

If you want embarrassing, try being a Smashing Pumpkins fan.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 7:30 PM
horizontal rule
61

Butthead: "Depeche Mode is French for 'we're wussies'." True dat.

Human League: "While we were apart I was human too." Game, set, suck.

Led Zeppelin was ruined for me by their endless rotation on FM rock radio, which left me feeling bludgeoned. I can still listen to Presence though, because the album contains no radio hits.

The Doors are summed up by FL: "that gay-ass keyboard playing." Take out Morrison's Rimbaud posing and you're left with the soundtrack to The Brady Bunch.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 9:42 PM
horizontal rule
62

Jeez, a thread about which bands are good and which bands suck (with a dash of "what's the Arabic word for x?") and here I was, busy all day.

Human League: essentially a one-hit wonder with a mildly catchy pop song.

Depeche Mode: some songs are cringe-inducingly embarrassing ("People are People"), but others are very good ("Personal Jesus"). And I like that their songs have cool sounds in them.

Doors: mostly sucky. What can you expect from a band with no bass player?

Led Zeppelin: objectively kickass. "Whole Lotta Love," people? "The Lemon Song"? I refuse any and all attempts to shame me for liking Zeppelin.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 9:47 PM
horizontal rule
63

Led Zeppelin has a lot of kickass, da, but it's mitigated by an unfortunate amount of this and this.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:00 PM
horizontal rule
64

Oh, yeah, "Battle of Evermore." I had forgotten about that.

But it's balanced out by "When the Levee Breaks"!


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:04 PM
horizontal rule
65

I refuse any and all attempts to shame me for liking Zeppelin.

Why do Led Zeppelin fans never feel the hobbit-shame?


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:05 PM
horizontal rule
66

The hobbit shit was only, like, 2% of what Zeppelin is about.

Jethro Tull, on the other hand.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:08 PM
horizontal rule
67

Jethro Tull rocked hard.

Do we need a Mel Gibson-specific thread?


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:09 PM
horizontal rule
68

I've had the great luck of never having heard any Jethro Tull songs about hobbits.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:14 PM
horizontal rule
69

Best moment in "Anchorman": when the jazz flute solo is interrupted by the shout of "Aqualung!"


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:15 PM
horizontal rule
70

Do we need a Mel Gibson-specific thread?

That is one seriously strange story. Not that I didn't suspect he felt that way, I'm just trying to imagine how drunk he'd have to be to actually say it out loud with witnesses.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:15 PM
horizontal rule
71

I don't even know if they ever sing about hobbits. But just from listening to the music I sense a hobbity-ness about them.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:17 PM
horizontal rule
72

Have you seen Josh Marshall's mysterious guest-blogger pick up on the Gibson story?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:18 PM
horizontal rule
73

hobbity-ness


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:19 PM
horizontal rule
74

I sense a hobbity-ness about your mom, apostropher. Don't fuck with Songs from the Wood.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:20 PM
horizontal rule
75

My mistake. It's Marshall himself.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:20 PM
horizontal rule
76

OK, you can fuck with "Solstice Bells".


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:22 PM
horizontal rule
77

73: Yup. I was starting to wonder whether I had them confused with some other band.

Does anyone remember that Sesame Street animated bit called "We All Live in a Capital I"? What band was that spoofing? Was that Jethro Tull?


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:23 PM
horizontal rule
78

Hey, I own Songs from the Wood and still listen to it. Ain't no denying the hobbity-ness, though. Not like it was unintentional.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:23 PM
horizontal rule
79

There's a difference between using elements of British folk music and, you know, singing about the "Dark Lord".


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:26 PM
horizontal rule
80

Hey, I love Steeleye Span's recording of The Return of the King.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:27 PM
horizontal rule
81

If there is a difference, it's negligible.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:28 PM
horizontal rule
82

I shouldn't have wasted "your mom" on apostropher.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:29 PM
horizontal rule
83

I shouldn't have wasted your mom.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:34 PM
horizontal rule
84

Your mom is so wasted, it's as though her talents aren't fully realized.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:36 PM
horizontal rule
85

Bleah.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:41 PM
horizontal rule
86

79: God, I love Standpipe.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:43 PM
horizontal rule
87

We all live in a Capital I

Not Jethro Tull, I don't think.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 10:57 PM
horizontal rule
88

The Gibson thing is truly bizarre. Unlike Apo, I'm pretty surprised. The beard is not helping things. And what does it mean to be a famous star on the downside of your career and to be widely known as an anti-semite? In Hollywood. I mean, the World Wide Organization of Jewish Masters has been pretty good to him. (Teo, please don't freeze the bank accounts.)

Very bizarre.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 11:01 PM
horizontal rule
89

Youtube has a video of Jethro Tull with Fela Kuti. That was a bad idea.

The use of the human league in the third comment here is pretty funny.


Posted by: joe o | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 11:16 PM
horizontal rule
90

Sometimes I have trouble falling asleep, but it's not so bad…


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 11:24 PM
horizontal rule
91

How anyone who saw Passion of the Christ can be surprised is a surprise to me.

That movie, for the people who weren't into the trainwreck enough to go and see it, featured Jewish children as demons who tormented Judas into killing himself, among other things which made it clear that the makers weren't concerned with bothering to stick anywhere near the storyline. Any of the four different storylines, in fact.


Posted by: winna | Link to this comment | 07-29-06 11:24 PM
horizontal rule
92

Yeah, it'd be nice if everyone who called the people who were talking about The Passion as ant-Semitic paranoid would admit that, okay, maybe it really was.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 4:43 AM
horizontal rule
93

87 -- possibly Traffic?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 4:48 AM
horizontal rule
94

I was just rocking out to the 1994 video here. Last time Ken Vandermark had fun? And when did Weasel Walter stop wearing the makeup?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:06 AM
horizontal rule
95

Oh wait, he still does that, but without the cool hair dealies.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:07 AM
horizontal rule
96

I do not understand this strange definition of 'swing' which is applied to rock music.

King Crimson's "Cat Food", piano courtesy Keith Tippett, swings.

Also, just so you know, Led Zeppelin rocks, and I maintain that it isn't completely lame to like Thick as a Brick

Submitted for your rocking.

Also, someone tell Weiner, who will probably call me a wanker for that last link, that I just ate a red-colored apple that was sweet and delicious as the warm desert air.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:17 AM
horizontal rule
97

Although really this is the true wanking (same drummer, though). Also it's the true fucking awesome.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:23 AM
horizontal rule
98

"We all live in a (blank)"? Goofy animation? Could it be... The Beatles? Definitely not Tull, it has much more of a late-sixties rock feel to it anyway. I'd say the music sounds more like Jefferson Airplane than the Beatles (or definitely Tull).

w-lfs-n, you're not a wanker for the Hella link, which was pretty cool. You're a wanker for bringing up distortionless Greg Lake-era King Crimson (that is, not "Schizoid Man") in a discussion of rocking. I mean, so does "Formentera Lady" swing, but what does that prove?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:03 AM
horizontal rule
99

ps I am aware that "Formentera Lady" isn't with Lake.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:06 AM
horizontal rule
100

97: Kinda hard to dance to, though.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:16 AM
horizontal rule
101

A law enforcement source says Gibson then noticed another female sergeant and yelled, "What do you think you're looking at, sugar tits?"

Yes, we do need a Gibson thread, I think.


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:24 AM
horizontal rule
102

Ttam, 87 does not sound at all Beatles-like to me.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:00 AM
horizontal rule
103

No, but sounding like the Beatles is hard. It must at least have been inspired by the Beatles. I think it sounds more like the Beatles than like Tull, and more like Airplane than either, though there's probably a band it sounds even more like.

(ps The point of occasionally signing messages "Ttam R." is to make it require a little effort to figure out who's made the comment. The idea being that casual observers might be offended, but anyone who puts enough effort into it to figure it out needs to be enough into the spirit of the place to get the joke. Accordingly, I politely request not to be called "Ttam" unless I've already started commenting as "Ttam R.")


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:21 AM
horizontal rule
104

Call me Namtaem.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:31 AM
horizontal rule
105

I just skimmed Hewitt's post, but what was crazy about it? I didn't see any calls for genocidal armageddon.

It seemed like he was saying we should check out people like the Muslim who shot up a Jewish community center recently to see if they have any ties to Islamic terror groups, instead of automatically writing them off as "mentally ill" lone gunmen. Is that such a bad idea?


Posted by: Gaijin Biker | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
106

Hewitt seems to be trying to erase the line between mentally ill and terrorist. He also claims that certain stories are being covered up, even though I've read a lot about them. He's also angry, though he doesn't express it that way, that no one is taking the Miami terrorist cell very seriously since they seem to have had no real organization or resources, no capacity for violence, and little or no Islamic connection, and furthermore to be whackos. He speculates that for each of the actual terrorists there are many more in hiding, even though the Miami case makes it look as though the police are scraping the bottom of the barrel in order to find any terrorists at all.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
107

Or perhaps he's just trying to create a baseline assumption that any Arab criminal is a terrorist until proven otherwise. I just wish these guys would leave the coasts and move to South Carolina or Mississipi or Argentina.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
108
Miller does raise a very real question of incitement. If the "mental illness" meme is expanded upon, "fire in a crowded theater" also enters the picture.

This sounds to me as though Hewitt is suggesting that the Seattle Times' mention of mental illness (in the third paragraph, after leading with "a Muslim-American man angry at Israel") verges on incitement of violence. Which is crazy. Just before that paragraph, Hewitt said that no responsible commentator would question a newspaper's freedom of speech; nevertheless, he brings up, out of the blue, the paradigm cases in which freedom of speech can be abridged.

[SCMT: Muslim, not Arab, the guy was Pakistani-American; and South Carolina is on the coast.]


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 9:03 AM
horizontal rule
109

Bill Wang was all over "Capital I" two years ago.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
110

South Carolina is on the coast

... and ...


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
111

... "leave the coasts and move to South Carolina" is inaptly phrased.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
112

103 -- Aha! My brain was not working properly this morning or something. Sorry and I will make efforts to mend my ways.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
113

Yeah, yeah. It was a stupid thing to write, for many reasons. Mississippi is misspelt, and has a coastline. I just want the states to be ideologically uniform, so that we know which ones to crush when we regain power. Is that so wrong?

And I herewith substitute Oklahoma for Mississippi and South Carolina. Why should we have to give up coastline?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
114

Weiner is on drugs today. First of all, it is not hard to sound like the Beatles. There's in fact a word for the phenomenon -- "Beatlesesque" -- that is used quite frequently. Tears for Fears had an incredibly Beatlesesque album a while back. There's also Klaatu. And there was a Canadian band that was really popular in the early 90s (whose name I can't remember and it's driving me nuts) who sounded exactly like the Beatles.

Secondly, the "Capital I" sound doesn't sound late-sixties at all. It sounds like the summer of 1972. And I should know, because I was one and a half years old then.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
115

first "sound" s/b "song" in the second paragraph.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
116

Can we agree that all terrorists have some degree of mental illness?

No.

Any crime of violence done to avenge a political grievance is an act of terrorism.

No.

How frustrating and dangerous. Hewitt's basically collapsing important distinctions between "hate crime" "political act" and "crazy." So now, if I'm schizophrenic and think that Mexicans are plotting to take over the U.S., and I shoot up a taqueria, I'm a terrorist? So we should use security resources to investigate the crazed fantasies of every nutter out there? And we should consider craziness that manifests itself through culturally-provided racist categories as no different from active, intentional racism? By that logic, if I imagine myself to be the long lost Russian Tsar, I am an expert in Russian history.

It's interesting, though, that here it seems Hewitt is ignoring the importance of intent; the argument seems to be that b/c the people being shot at can't tell if the shooter is a racist, a crazy person, or a terrorist, they're all the same thing. I often tend to think that effect-based arguments like this are useful (e.g., when thinking about rape), but this seems so clearly fucked up to me that it makes me have to rethink that habit.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
117

a Canadian band

Sloan?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:41 AM
horizontal rule
118

105:What Tim said about creating the baseline assumption. (Also a large resource waste if every Muslim criminal must be pursued vigorously as a possible terrorist connection.) Plus, it's unclear that Hewitt would be satisfied by a normal investigation unless it turned up a definitive terrorist connection; I think this because it's already standard procedure for some crimes (like vandalizing a synagogue) to investigate whether there's a connection with a hate group.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:43 AM
horizontal rule
119

I listen to that song and I can almost hear Grace Slick singing backup. And, just so you know, "The Lemon Song" is Howlin' Wolf's excellent "Killing Floor" played at half speed and marinated in suck.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
120

119 to 114. Your other choices for objectively good Zep songs are sound, though.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
121

114: I like to imagine Weiner, blissed out and staring up at the sky, asking, "Dude, what if 'dog' were spelled 'c-a-t.'"


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
122

111: I meant that both Argentina and Mississippi also have coastlines, in addition to SC. Which is what Tim picked up on, himself. Carry on. Just don't bogart that, and remember to pick the arm up when it gets to the end of "The Crunge" or you'll ruin the needle, and I don't know where to get another one of those these days.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
123

You're a wanker for bringing up distortionless Greg Lake-era King Crimson (that is, not "Schizoid Man") in a discussion of rocking. [...] ps I am aware that "Formentera Lady" isn't with Lake.

"Cat Food" isn't with Lake either, jeez.

"The Lemon Song" is Howlin' Wolf's excellent "Killing Floor" played at half speed and marinated in suck.

With an assist from Ro-Jo's "Traveling Riverside Blues".


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:17 AM
horizontal rule
124

"Cat Food" isn't with Lake either, jeez.

Oh yeah?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
125

So now, if I'm schizophrenic and think that Mexicans are plotting to take over the U.S., and I shoot up a taqueria, I'm a terrorist?

That, and everything else we know about you.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
126

The fundamental fallacy here is that I am mocking others as wankers while rattling off discographical details of Greg Lake-era KC and remembering the existence of "Formentera Lady."


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:35 AM
horizontal rule
127

Blast! However it was interesting to learn that Jamie Muir was the first person to join the Larks' Tongues lineup. (When I read Derek Bailey's Improvisation, I thought it was really weird that the British rock guitarist he chose to interview was, IIRC, Steve Howe, when there seemed a more obvious choice with the same sort of spirit.)


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:39 AM
horizontal rule
128

126: I wasn't going to say it.

And I kind of like "Formentera Lady".


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
129

Collins, Wallace and Burrell left King Crimson to form a band called Snape

Is this time-travelling hobbit influence, or is there a common cause? Or is that Rowling person a fan of KC arcana? Or coincidence?

Once, after I'd been into free improv for years, I heard an interesting far-out improvisation in a store. It sounded a little too close to rock to be AMM or any of those guys, but it was cool. Eventually I realized it was "Providence."


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
130

Ah, great. w-lfs-n is back in the fray, so the thread can get even more esoteric. What's the most embarrassing song you members of the music cognoscenti will own up to still enjoying? I didn't grow up listening to music, and I remain stuck largely in the 80's and 90's. I have built built-in excuses. Still, I admit this is shameful: "Lady in Red." My excuse is that I associate it with my biggest adolescent crush, and it brings back memories of that time. And I only get a craving once every couple years. And, dammit, it's not like I've killed someone. Yet.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
131

117: No, there's another Beatlesesque Canadian band I'm thinking of.

119: The part that is stolen from "Killing Floor" is indeed marinated in suck (and extra bad because it's stolen, yet the credits on the LP label say "Page/Plant"), but that part only lasts 30 seconds. The rest of the song rawks.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
132

59 -- My mistake. I'm pretty sure the band I was mixing up with Tears for Fears was The Cure.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
133

(It remains a possibility that I was confusing Depeche Mode with The Cure simpliciter, and just threw Tears for Fears into the mix out of perversity.)


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
134

But did you know that there's a longer version of "Providence" in the Great Deceiver box set? Or would it take someone with 35 discrete King Crimson albums to know that?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:54 AM
horizontal rule
135

131: Are you thinking of "Bring It On Home"? That's the song where the stolen blues part is only 30 seconds; I'm pretty sure that the rip-off of "Killing Floor" takes up most of "The Lemon Song."

I enjoy "Don't You Want Me?," you bastards.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
136

35 discrete CDs. I don't have 35 discrete albums.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
137

I think I did know that. I've seen the track listing to Great Deceiver but hadn't heard it much, though I suspect I'd like it.

Are the post-94 albums any good?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
138

It's a wonder you have a discrete anything.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
139

136: As opposed to 35 continuous CDs?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
140

Best stoner lyrics: not Zep or Hendrix, but Arthur Lee (Love) and Stevie Nicks (Fleetwood Mac). The Nirvana guy has been disqualified for the shotgun in the mouth thing.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
141

I don't know if your dating is meant to include VROOOM in the suspected-to-be-bad set, but it's good. And I liked THRaKaTTaK (though found naming conventions from this period kinda dumb). There was some decent stuff on The Power to Believe, and the EP whose name I can't remember that came out after they toured with Tool had a really great version of The Deception of the Thrush.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
142

Reviewing lyrics and my memories, maybe the "Killing Floor" part of "The Lemon Song" doesn't last as long as I thought. I maintain, however, that "Bring It on Home" is the only one of these two with a rawkin' central section, as "The Lemon Song" is just goofy. And Wikipedia saith that "Bring It on Home" was credited to Page/Plant, while TLS was credited to Page/Plant/Jones/Bonham. dagger aleph, I leave it up to you which you meant.

In any case, Robert Plant needs kicked.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
143

135: Ah yes, I was confused, because I thought only the sped-up part in the middle was taken from "Killing Floor". But now I've listened to the Howlin' Wolf and see that you are right on the particulars; you are still wrong, however, in your aesthetic assessment, because "The Lemon Song" is great.

SCMT: "The Lady in Red"? Oh dear. And I was feeling solidarity with you on the Smiths question.

A friend of mine had a visceral hatred for "The Lady in Red" because she danced with some guy at a school dance and he put his hands on her ass during it.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
144

A friend of mine had a visceral hatred for "The Lady in Red" because she danced with some guy at a school dance and he put his hands on her ass during it.

My excuse is that I associate it with my biggest adolescent crush, and it brings back memories of that time.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:13 PM
horizontal rule
145

142: Yeah, I meant "The Lemon Song", which is basically "Killing Floor" played slowly, but then played at normal speed in the middle. As for the Page/Plant credit, I was just making the point that they claim credit for themselves. I was going from memory, and didn't remember Bonham being credited. Must be all those drugs I didn't do in high school.

SCMT: you scarred my friend Joanne for life.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
146

What can I say? She had a nice ass. (In real life, I think it was a while after that when I first "slow danced" with a girl.)


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
147

Joanne was already a scarred, Tim, don't let her Munchausening make you feel guilty.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 12:41 PM
horizontal rule
148

I don't care for the Lady in Red song or the Wonderful Tonight song mostly because of creep guys singing along and changing the words to suit the girl's appearance. Also, it's the sort of sixth-grade Two-Step Rock Back and Forth dancing that we'd best all forget.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
149

My first slow dance was Foreigner's "Waiting for a Girl Like You". I have not retained any sentimental fondness for the song.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 4:00 PM
horizontal rule
150

You know what rocks? Judas Priest on the banjo.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 4:40 PM
horizontal rule
151

So what's the song, Apo? The unjustifiable song?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:02 PM
horizontal rule
152

I'm not sure what you're asking me, Tim.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:23 PM
horizontal rule
153

Duh -- he's asking you to name the unjustifiable song. (I'd be careful though, as that song's name has never been spoken without severe consequences to the speaker and his children, and his children's children, yea even to the fifth generation.)


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:36 PM
horizontal rule
154

Hmm. I've lost no affection for KISS over the years, despite the terminally high cheese factor. Does that count?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:43 PM
horizontal rule
155

43b: That's more a Saddam al-Gibson look.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:51 PM
horizontal rule
156

In any case, Robert Plant needs kicked.

It's the missing Pittsburgh infinitive!


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 5:57 PM
horizontal rule
157

That's a participle.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 6:22 PM
horizontal rule
158

The missing "to be" is an infinitive. Though I'm not sure that a sentence denigrating Robert Plant can count as Pittsburghese; have you ever listened to Pittsburgh radio?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 6:33 PM
horizontal rule
159

Oh, I see, you're interpreting it as missing an infinitive. Is that the usual analysis?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 6:38 PM
horizontal rule
160

Looking up my old entry on this, the American Dialect Society people say that it's 'want/need' + past participle, but most Pittsburghers think of it as a missing 'to be'. So, depends on your comparison class for 'usual'.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 6:54 PM
horizontal rule
161

ADS is my usual comparison class.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:19 PM
horizontal rule
162

It's sort of like dropped g's in my opinion; the Language Log folks like to rant about how speakin' of dropped g's is phonologically inaccurate, but people without linguistic training will understand you. Ditto if you talk about the missing Pittsburgh infinitive.

Also, the ADS people seem to predict wrongly that Kotsko and Ogged won't use positive 'anymore', so I don't trust them implicitly.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:31 PM
horizontal rule
163

If it had a 'to be', it would be correct English. Therefore, it is missing a 'to be'.

Hey, how does Hamlet's famous speech begin?

"Or not."


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:32 PM
horizontal rule
164

have you ever listened to Pittsburgh radio?

*Shudder* Thanks for the reminder of painful memories. (I remember hearing Alanis Morissette's "Ironic" for the first time... on what passed for the indie station in Pittsburgh.) There are many things to like about Pittsburgh; the radio scene (at least in the early- to mid-'90s) is not one of them.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 7:37 PM
horizontal rule
165

I've always thought of it as using a past participle in place of a present participle. Historically I doubt there was ever an infinitive in there.

Ogged and Kotsko are posing.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
166

Wait, Kotsko isn't even from Chicago, is he?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:12 PM
horizontal rule
167

Kotsko is from Kalamazoo, Kankakee, or Ypsilanti.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-30-06 8:13 PM
horizontal rule
168

That's why I said "Chicago or Michigan" in the linked thread.

This article says 'copula deletion', but I can't find many other references to copula deletion in relation to Pittsburghese. OTOH "wants traded" seems to be used fairly often in a relevant way, and I just can't hear that as developing out of "wants trading"; dig.

[Update now that comments are back up: I searched on "wants trading" + sports and not a single example is relevant. It seems that "wants traded" has to be derived from "wants to be traded" rather than "wants trading." But I can't think of another example where verb + present participle is nonexistent. Why could this be?]


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
169

A Gopogle war proves that it is Kankakee, though there are significant Kalamazoo and Ypsilanti commenctions.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
170

Kotsko is not from Kankakee.


Posted by: silvana | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
171

silvana, are you claiming you have some method that's better than counting Google hits? I doubt that. Google hits yield nice quantitative results.

(Um, Michigan, I should've linked that in 162 or 168.)


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 9:46 AM
horizontal rule
172

A mythical place called Bourbonnais gets a few more hits than Kankakee, but come on, guys. He's not from there, and he's not from Endor or Lemuria or Mu either.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 9:59 AM
horizontal rule
173

Okay, so, what are dropped g's really? Is it something to do with the way British writers render them as -en instead of -in'?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
174

A long discussion of dropped g's by Mark Liberman.

He wasn't as harsh on the expression 'dropped g' as I remember, but I still think his criticism of Wieseltier is somewhat misguided; "land very hard on that 'g'" does an effective job of conveying what it actually sounds like, even if the sound isn't 'g' as in 'gum'.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
175

I don't have a great deal of fondness for Leon Wieseltier.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 10:18 AM
horizontal rule
176

The Chicago locution that seemed most strange to me when I arrived thirty years ago was ending sentences with prepositions that had implied objects.

"Are you coming with?"

Dipthongs don't sound at all distinct in Chicagoese. St. Ignatius' surname is rendered locally as Lie-oh-la. Mostly dipthongs resolve, or sound to me like they do, into their first vowel. So ruin=rune, and theater=theeter.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 10:26 AM
horizontal rule
177

Lie-oh-la sounds like a political scandal, as covered by the Daily News.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 10:34 AM
horizontal rule
178

I thought about that when I typed it, but then I thought: "Too generic." How could you tell that scandal from any other?


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 10:43 AM
horizontal rule
179

It could be generic, as payola is generic. "politician x involved in another lie-oh-la scandal.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 10:52 AM
horizontal rule
180

I'm not saying the past participle construction developed from the present participle construction, just that they're parallel in structure and there's no a priori reason to assume that one one and not the other developed from loss of a copula.

The language log folks can be weirdly strident in denouncing misconceptions about language. I don't care for their tone a lot of the time.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 3:38 PM
horizontal rule
181

I like the weird stridency. It makes me happy knowing that there's someone out there who is really, really steamed that people think The Elements Of Style gives good advice.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
182

"Stay where you're at, I'll come where you're to."
-- reported Newfoundlandism.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 5:43 PM
horizontal rule
183

"Are you coming with?"

I'm familiar with this construction from Minnesotans. I always thought it was from the German: kommst du mit?


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 6:05 PM
horizontal rule
184

"Are you coming with?"

I hear that in North Carolina.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 6:14 PM
horizontal rule
185

Many of these structures have resulted from German influence.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 6:17 PM
horizontal rule
186

The "So.....then" and "So then......." patterns are also borrowed from German.

"So then, are we going to the movie?"

"So, are we going to the movie then?"


This pattern was featured in the movie "Fargo". The daughter of a firend of mine mimicked it.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 6:46 PM
horizontal rule
187

Also in German, the same word "mit" means both "with" and "along" -- so "kommst du mit?" = "are you coming with?" = "are you coming along?"


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-31-06 6:54 PM
horizontal rule
188

he was saying we should check out people like the Muslim who shot up a Jewish community center

Interestingly, he was actually a convert to Christianity.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 08- 1-06 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
189

33: Maybe you're thinking of "Hadath-- unclean things which require Niyyat for cleaning"? --Arabic Dictionary at http://www.stanford.edu/~jamila/dictionary.html


Posted by: Matt's mom | Link to this comment | 08- 1-06 2:39 PM
horizontal rule