Re: Nom Nom Nominees

1

I'm going to bed now, but yes, they werepainful, what I saw of them.


Posted by: David | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 6:43 PM
horizontal rule
2

No.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 6:46 PM
horizontal rule
3

I don't even have an Oscars.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 6:51 PM
horizontal rule
4

I watched about 20 seconds of NPH and punted. Why do prisoners drop the soap?? One quick glance back that caught Martin and Baldwin in full glory and I'm done for the night.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 6:52 PM
horizontal rule
5

My landlord is either having an Oscars viewing party, or he just decided to invite a bunch of people, plus a dog, into his home just for today. I assume it's the same dog that was here when he had a party last Halloween, but from the basement, all dogs running on wood floors above sound about the same.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 6:54 PM
horizontal rule
6

4: Apparently, the director or producer originally suggested Sacha Baron Cohen to host but the Academy nixed it.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 6:55 PM
horizontal rule
7

re: 6

According to the UK press, Cohen had a skit with Ben Stiller but it was cut because they were wary of offending James Cameron [apparently] and Cohen wasn't prepared to cut or alter it in some way or other. Cohen was to perform as one of the smurf-like things from Avatar.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:01 PM
horizontal rule
8

7: The second interview here is where the Cohen-as-host story broke, I think.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:10 PM
horizontal rule
9

♫ Nom nom nominees, nom nom nominees


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:14 PM
horizontal rule
10

9: That was the reference. Well remembered.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:21 PM
horizontal rule
11

I remember, but I wouldn't have made the connection to the reference.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:28 PM
horizontal rule
12

8: I am making the mistake of listening to the one with Cameron. The combination of my hatred for Terry Gross and my hatred for James Cameron hurtttttts.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:44 PM
horizontal rule
13

ARRRRG. Cameron is like doing this kinda like Rousseau-type thing, and thinking about how like indigenous people are, um, something, and really really wants a cookie for a having disabled protagonist.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:48 PM
horizontal rule
14

Also, he basically sees himself as a Surrealist, which is why he doesn't have to explain any of the images or plot points.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:52 PM
horizontal rule
15

To merge threads, I've gotten out of arrests....because I'm a surrealist.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 7:55 PM
horizontal rule
16

If I could screen-capture and lolcatize what I just saw on my TV screen, it would read: "Smug Tarantino is smug".


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 8:18 PM
horizontal rule
17

That sound-editing thing narrated by Moran Freeman was pretty good. They should do more shit like that.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
18

^g


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 8:21 PM
horizontal rule
19

"Take pause" sounds awkward to me.

So does James Taylor.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 8:33 PM
horizontal rule
20

Pictures of the pretty pretty dresses are already up at New York Magazine, so there's no point to watching the damn thing anyway. Not that I even have a TV etc.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 8:43 PM
horizontal rule
21

Keanu Reeves: still bad at speaking out loud.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:06 PM
horizontal rule
22

But a writing he pretty good.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:08 PM
horizontal rule
23

Cheater!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:09 PM
horizontal rule
24

I have no idea what you're talking about. (Okay, I had a typo in that comment that I fixed.)


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:10 PM
horizontal rule
25

So is this the "actors known for comic roles get the prize just because they finally did something serious" Oscars? Or were Bridges and Bullock actually deserving? The only 2009 movies I've seen are District 9 and Up (after they came out on DVD), so I'm clueless.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:54 PM
horizontal rule
26

Bridges was supposedly very good in his movie (which I haven't seen).


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:55 PM
horizontal rule
27

Oh, never mind, I saw more 2009 movies. Like (500) Days of Summer. Thank god it didn't get any awards.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:55 PM
horizontal rule
28

Mark Boal looks a lot like someone I know. It's very distracting.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 9:57 PM
horizontal rule
29

Sandra Bullock is known for comic roles? I guess it's been a long time since Speed and The Net.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 10:42 PM
horizontal rule
30

Also, didn't this blog once get lots of comments for an event like this. I don't really care, but the quiet is pushing me more and more towards doing work. Speaking of which, what does "become a leader in adherence to [local legislation]" mean? Of course organizations should adhere to the law, but how is that supposed to be an "opportunity", rather than just what they're supposed to do?


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 10:45 PM
horizontal rule
31

She wasn't known for comic roles until about six months ago. Although I think Miss Congeniality, was her only comedy of the past decade (except its sequel) and also her only big hit of the past decade.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 10:50 PM
horizontal rule
32

I'm surprised to see it happen, but the expanding of the Best Picture field to include movies that literally nobody thought had any value except as moneymakers has really made the whole thing seem different to me. I always wanted to watch it before if I liked the hosts. and I like this year's hosts. Oh well.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 10:51 PM
horizontal rule
33

Has anyone actually seen The Blind Side? I will believe it if someone says Bullock was amazing in it, but I've only seen the trailer and it looks just awful. Every line is a cringer. "You're changing that boy's life!" "No, he's changing mine." How do you do good work with material like that?


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 10:55 PM
horizontal rule
34

|| If part of the assignment was to talk about the effect of various influences on a subsidiary organization's budget, "perhaps there is an overall organizational budget" for the larger organization doesn't cut it. Do some research, please. Like maybe a couple of google searches and some clicking on the results of those searches. You expect us to turn in a "perhaps" in this context?

I should have read this over earlier. |>


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 10:56 PM
horizontal rule
35

W/r/t Blind Side, it apparently comes down to the combination of (1) everybody (for certain values of "everybody") loves Sandra Bullock, and (2) she both changed her hair color and remembered in every scene to do her southern accent.


Posted by: Mr. Blandings | Link to this comment | 03- 7-10 11:04 PM
horizontal rule
36

It was one of the commentariat who linked to this on facebook and I suddenly can't remember his pseud my god I'm losing my mind


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 03- 8-10 5:53 AM
horizontal rule
37

I saw The Blind Side (at the request of a teenager we were taking, so I couldn't say no, and while it wasn't as offensive as I'd expected it also wasn't anything extraordinary. The actor playing Michael Oher did a great job with what he was given. Bullock, whatevs. There was no tension, no character development, nothing. The teen we took loved it.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 03- 8-10 12:20 PM
horizontal rule
38

The best line I saw about why Blind Side was nominated (can't remember where) was that it speaks to two things people in the Academy love: 1) helping those less fortunate and 2) using charity to crush everyone else on the field.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 03- 8-10 8:16 PM
horizontal rule