Re: Furniture

1

Ooh, that's handsome. If I could change one thing, it'd be to move the lower area to the right-hand side, as I tend to work with material to the right.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
2

You should save some pics for the archives. Mid century style indeed.

Looks nice. But sharp edges and corners could clash with my knees.


Posted by: Econolicious desk jobber | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
3

I can't take anything seriously as an antique that's younger than me.

Quite a nice desk, but.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
4

3: If you ever do find you're taking a desk too seriously, you can remind yourself that one of the words for "desk" in Spanish is pupitre.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
5

Chris y is so midcentury modern.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 11:51 AM
horizontal rule
6

Reminds me of a sculpture in Beetlejuice


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 12:47 PM
horizontal rule
7

It appears to be two entirely unrelated desks stuck together. I feelike I would like either one separately, but not together.

OTOH, the desk I'm sitting at now is ugly as sin.


Posted by: Jimmy Pongo | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 1:39 PM
horizontal rule
8

looks like all the old shit we had in our basement when i was a kid. better construction, probably tho.


Posted by: yoyo | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 3:00 PM
horizontal rule
9

If heebie had a nickel for every time one of her posts has entertained one of us, she could have like thirty goddamned desks.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 4:00 PM
horizontal rule
10

That desk has nice lines, visually, but I'd definitely be banging my knees against the drawers to the left (plus some other reservations about it, matters of personal taste, overall not a big fan).

It's funny, I figured I'd try to find a desk I do adore, and checked out the Arts & Crafts subcategory of desks on eBay (I like the Arts & Crafts style usually! I figured) ... hm, some of those are handsome, but I can't see myself actually using them.

I'm thinking now that desks present a troublesome design issue: you'd love a beautiful piece, but you're going to be using thing this, a lot, and I myself do not desire extraneous bits of wood under my feet/legs.

Also, just noting that I tend to cross my legs under a desk, and anything with a central drawer (or other down-hanging thing atop my knees) under the top surface is going to be a problem.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 4:52 PM
horizontal rule
11

That desk has nice lines, visually,

That desk looks like one piece of furniture involuntarily grafted onto another. It is the Human Centipede of desks.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 5:05 PM
horizontal rule
12

Table-style desks (with curvy legs, maybe) for the win, then! A pull-out/roll-out file drawer to one side may be acceptable, but only if the desk is fairly long to begin with, to prevent the banging of the knees. No central drawer above the knees.

I'm thinking that "antique" desks may not be able to fit this bill, since they date from a time before people spent as much time at their desks, pre-internet and pre-piles of paper which must be accommodated. Then again, people did once write an awful lot of letters -- at writing desks.

We don't have any design fans here? My own knowledge of these things is lacking. It is Saturday night, I realize.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
13

12.1: Yup. I like a desk to be just a table at the right height to sit and put a laptop and a notebook on. Simple and useful.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 6:39 PM
horizontal rule
14

haterz be trippin. damn right it hasn't met it's reserve, which is...1800? I'd say, min. fuck, no, gottabe more.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 7:42 PM
horizontal rule
15

I got obsessed with mid-century desks before I came to my senses and realized there isn't space for a desk in my apartment. I liked the style that seems to be called floating-top and of course the classic Heywood Wakefield kneehole desk. One day, in a larger apartment...


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 8:43 PM
horizontal rule
16

that was me


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 8:43 PM
horizontal rule
17

I have a gorgeous mid-century teak writing desk, tiny, with three drawers on one side and just pencil legs on the other, in my store. come to Narnia.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 07- 9-11 11:51 PM
horizontal rule
18

I can't sleep.

Many desks are too small for me.

I actually quite liked the cubicle desks we had at the stock brokerage. Obviously, they weren't much to look at, but they were very functional and ergonomic.

Currently, I have been bumping my knee, which I injured a few weeks ago by falling -- Kerplop! -- in Uptown, on desks and things like that. It really, really hurts.

That is all I have to say on this topic.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 12:31 AM
horizontal rule
19

||
Some messed up crashes on the Tour today. Worst had three riders out with various bones broken (at least one went down an embankment), but the most infuriating for the riders was when one of the cars which was alongside the 5-man breakaway on a very narrow road swerved right to avoid a tree and put one ride on the road which forced another into a barbed-wire fence.
|>


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
20

14: Well, ...

This is the sort of desk I typically lust after, or perhaps this. I'm sure, however, that those would be horribly impractical (or so I console myself), so I would cheerfully settle for this or even this simple but elegant creature.


Posted by: Jimmy Pongo | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 8:29 AM
horizontal rule
21

||
And US women score 80 seconds in against Brazil.
|>


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 8:33 AM
horizontal rule
22

19 - it's been a crazy week all round, I don't understand why. I missed this afternoon's crash though as had to go out, got back and C told me. We almost cried on Friday when Brad went out.


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 9:45 AM
horizontal rule
23

Hope Solo is such a great name for a goalie.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
24

Is this the open thread?

I report from the Sunday talking head shows that the amount and degree of lazy, irresponsible talk perpetuated thereon actually stunned me. They're usually a little more conscientious (at least nodding toward fact-based discussion) than this, they really usually are.

Commentators kept referring to the "tax increases" Democrats are insisting upon, and then arguing heatedly about whether these "tax hikes" can possibly be acceptable in a down economy, blah blah.

Except, well, no, in reality, people, no increases in the tax rate are proposed, but rather revenue increases generated by eliminating some tax loopholes. As they know perfectly well. Whence the lazy formulation which undoubtedly leads quite a few listeners to believe that tax rate increases are being contemplated?

This is thoroughly disgusting. It got so bad on the few minutes of Fox News Sunday that I watched that Juan Williams was arguing with that jackass Brit Hume's statement that 'Obama agreed in December to extend the Bush tax cuts for everyone, so what happened to his policy between then and now, and why is he reversing course now?' WTF? (Juan does not seem very bright, and did not reply to this obfuscation appropriately, but rather seemed to grant the premise that tax hikes are on the table. Mara Liasson, for what it's worth, was over to one side going, "Hold on, now hold on, wait a minute," but Juan and Brit were on a roll.)

But of course that's Fox News. This kind of unclarity and misrepresentation was present on the other shows as well. I really found it baffling and angry-making.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
25

Very questionable call on re-taking that PK. Plus US playing now with 10--I guess the red was appropriate, although it was a bit close as well (no dispute on it being a penalty).


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:06 AM
horizontal rule
26

Oh, also everyone kept saying "Everyone agrees that the deficit is a serious problem for our economy" and "Everyone knows that entitlements have to be addressed" and "Nobody thinks that our level of debt isn't a huge problem" and so on.

Fuckin' A.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
27

I imagine I should have previewed to see that the topic is sports. Don't mind me.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
28

This is annoying officiating. Marta and Solo are both fun to watch.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
29

26 is sport too.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:32 AM
horizontal rule
30

We have a secretary/desk very similar to this. One of our few actual nice pieces of furniture, but it gets used very rarely; almost all actual work takes place on a bi-fold closet door that I laid across an old breakfast table as a temporary measure 15 years ago*. I blame computers.

*Heebie should not come to our house, we also have kid art on the walls that we've never gotten around to taking down and other eccentric decorating items of personal significance. Because we don't care.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
31

30: Dude, I have two (2) driftwood lamps. They're technically my housemate's, but actually, I rather like them. There is also a piece of driftwood hanging on the living room wall. It's the natural look, you see.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
32

She uses this 5 piece 3-ton industrial sheet metal thingy with attached sideboards and printer well and included filing cabinets and god knows what-all. She also has a simpler thing, just boards, for laptop and monitor. Very nice leather highback swivel chairs sidearms

I use a big piece of plywood on top of two large cans and an old kitchen or folding chair, surrounded by walls of electronics, books, papers, discs. I move down to floor sometimes.

I have never understood why people want or like pretty and nice things. Just flawed human nature, I suppose. Umm, them, not me.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:58 AM
horizontal rule
33

GOAAAAAAAALLLLL!!!!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:00 AM
horizontal rule
34

Wow!


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:00 AM
horizontal rule
35

Still means it is a tie and we go to kicks.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:01 AM
horizontal rule
36

29: It reminded me of wrestling, or at least what Barthes had to say about that.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
37

Is it just me, or is the Google+ interface kind of weird and hard to get started with?


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
38

Done!


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
39

And there was no doubt about it ...


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:15 AM
horizontal rule
40

Now I can go get breakfast/lunch.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:19 AM
horizontal rule
41

Heebie should not come to our house, we also have kid art on the walls that we've never gotten around to taking down and other eccentric decorating items of personal significance. Because we don't care.

Wait, what? Dude, you have serious misconceptions about design.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:21 AM
horizontal rule
42

I'm not sure what specifically the "wait, what?" is responding to so am not sure where to look for my misconceptions.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
43

28: Marta and Solo are both fun to watch.

Not at all tough to look at either.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
44

The only people who don't like kid art and eccentric items of personal significance are the people peddling in McMansions.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:29 AM
horizontal rule
45

36:

When the villainy of wrestlers was rooted in their national identity, their evil was presented as inherent in their natures. Related to genuine political conflicts in the actual world, the evil of a Russian wrestler seemed real. But villainy has become something more fluid and elusive in the era of postmodern tribalism. Since the contemporary wrestler appears to choose his tribal affiliations, he also gets to choose whether to be a hero or a villain (again, these matters are carefully scripted by the WWF and the WCW authorities, but we are talking about how things are meant to appear to the wrestling public). The most striking characteristic of post-Cold War wrestling is the dizzying rapidity with which today's wrestlers switch from hero to villain and back again. Wrestlers used to spend their whole careers defined as either good guys or bad guys. Now they alter their natures so often that it no longer makes sense to speak of them as natural heroes or villains in the first place. The contemporary wrestler exemplifies the thoroughly postmodern idea that human identity is purely a construction, a matter of choice, not nature.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
46

I once had an interior architect/designer, who actually knew me rather well, suggest that in my ur-home I should have a giant antique rocking chair. Why and whence, I have no idea. The point being that eccentric personal items are de rigeur in design, even if you have to import them specially.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:35 AM
horizontal rule
47

a bi-fold closet door that I laid across an old breakfast table as a temporary measure 15 years ago*.

We have a regular door resting on two two-drawer filing cabinets. We replaced it with a nice, inherited desk for a few years, but I always saved the door, and now the nice desk is dismantled in the basement.

The door-desk is bigger and more stable, and the filing cabinets supply a lot of handy storage. And now it has the hutch from the nice desk on top of it.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
48

45: Flip, that is a link to the Weekly Standard? Do I want to go there?


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
49

Barthes on wrestling.


Posted by: eliot | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
50

48: Yes, but pre-George W. Bush and all that ensued, so one can read it through a haze of nostalgia for the trivia of the late '90s.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:48 AM
horizontal rule
51

44: Hmm, I probably misinterpreted, Anyway, dear design websites: DIY shit usually looks like DIY shit. Sorry about that. and Not everything becomes art just because you hang it on a wall.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:48 AM
horizontal rule
52

I wonder what Barthes had to say about wrestling.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:49 AM
horizontal rule
53

Barthes said the ur-home wrestles an antique rocking chair as Jacob the angel.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
54

DIY shit is shit like: Take two dozen clothespins, and clip them around a picture frame! Take an old vest, and pin it to a wall, and stick a bunch of pins in it, and use it to hang your jewelry!

It's these afternoon-art-projects for adults, which sometimes works, but mostly doesn't.

Anyway, I'm mildly offended.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:51 AM
horizontal rule
55

51: And in case it is not clear, I do mean that the misinterpretation is likely to be all on my side. I don't always read closely enough. It is a bad habit, but I still do it.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
56

Because I have strong opinions about what I'd want to see in my own house, but I love seeing what other people do in their own houses, and I almost always find it lovely and charming. And there's a ton of pretentiousness in the design world, but I really don't think I'm particularly pretentious, and that's basically what you were accusing me of being.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
57

With the DIY shit, I didn't want to provide links because I didn't want to insult bloggers who I otherwise like. But not having tangible examples definitely made the post unclear.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:54 AM
horizontal rule
58

Can we talk more about the Tour? Probably not, I know, but it seemed worth a try.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
59

Off to go grocery shopping! I'm sure you think my witty banter outweighs my occasional pretentiousness, so comity.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
60

Just in case, I want to register my love for Gilbert. Actually, I've loved him before now, but his performance in this year's Classics and now in this Tour has elevated his status to apple of my eye.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
61

DIY shit is shit like: Take two dozen clothespins, and clip them around a picture frame! Take an old vest, and pin it to a wall, and stick a bunch of pins in it, and use it to hang your jewelry!

"Why don't you turn your child into an Infanta for a fancy-dress party? Why don't you wash your blond child's hair in dead champagne, as they do in France?"

[N.B. that Opinionated Diana Vreeland is already familiar with both the S.J. Perelman parody of the foregoing, thanks to literacy, and the "Put a bird on it!" thing from Portlandia, thanks to the Internet beating every moderately amusing thing in the world to death.]


Posted by: OPINIONATED DIANA VREELAND | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
62

55 before seeing 54. Sorry*, it's nothing that a big drink of water won't make better.

*And actually I did not mean to make that much about being an accusation of pretension. There are in fact reasons to conform with design and fashion norms (or not really "conform" but at least spend some time thinking about them, and in particular with regard to friends and family). Pure utility alone has its place, but there is a certain selfishness and asocial lack of consideration for visitors that my family's living space and style exhibit that is really not very commendable.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
63

62.*: A little bit pretension accusation of course.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 12:09 PM
horizontal rule
64

50: That is such a bizarre article. 'nuff said.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 12:13 PM
horizontal rule
65

64: A lot of WS stuff that I have seen -- to be fair, not that much -- is like that: conclusions unuttered, whole libraries of argument packed into a sidelong adjective like "mendacious" or "corrupt," unsavory associations unacknowledged (praising proponents of Christian Reconstructionism, blaming the Catholic Church's sex scandals on, and I am not kidding, liberal Jesuits with "only single malt and sodomy for existential comfort," etc., etc.).


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
66

64, 65: But that one really is something. When one looks at wrestling's "progress" from the 1950s to the 1990s, one really has to be concerned about America's future. Where have you gone Bruno Sammartino? A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

And I suspect he wrote the whole thing to justify using the last image: Perhaps, then, when we watch -- and enjoy -- the WWF and the WCW, we really are wrestling with the end of history. Whoa, dude!

As the Dallas-Miami series exhibited those who love to find and write about moral arcs in sport are the lowest form of life in the universe. And here we have it compounded with Buckleyism--doubleplus fatuous!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
67

65, 66: I don't know what to say. I've never read the Weekly Standard, and the only representative of it I glimpse from time to time (as far as I know) is the supremely smarmy Bill Kristol, who pisses me off pretty much instantaneously.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
68

Can we talk more about the Tour?

Sure. I am reminded of the Surfaris. And what's this about a cager running riders off the road? Bikes get enough of that in real life.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 1:11 PM
horizontal rule
69

At work, I don't even have a desk--just filing cabinets with slabs of wood on it. Being short and having a laptop, this gave me bad tendonitis. I had to go to a doctor and fight to get a good chair, a footrest, keyboard and monitor.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 1:33 PM
horizontal rule
70

58: I assume this will force some changes in what cars they allow to do what. Really nuts that a car would be alongside on that narrow of a road with trees on the berm. But then a lot of crazy team car and TV car/motorcycle driving so I guess it is inevitable something like this would occur. I was also struck by the enmity for Alexandre Vinokouro in some liveblogs I saw. He's out in his final tour with a possible broken pelvis and/or femur after the horrific descent crash and there is a lot of "good riddance." Drugs work and people are moralistic prigs with blinders it turns out.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
71

65: Single malt and sodomy? Sign me up!


Posted by: Light Rail Tycoon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 2:39 PM
horizontal rule
72

Just in case, I want to register my love for Gilbert. Actually, I've loved him before now, but his performance in this year's Classics and now in this Tour has elevated his status to apple of my eye.

I'm assuming you mean Gilbert Arenas.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
73

Single malt and sodomy are for European sophisticates. In the heartland we prefer cheap beer and oral.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
74

We prefer expressive beer, but never have the money. At least that's what we tell ourselves.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 4:14 PM
horizontal rule
75

Thank heaven the oral is free.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 4:18 PM
horizontal rule
76

Fucking scab.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 4:28 PM
horizontal rule
77

I saw a "Food not Bombs" thing today. I'd probably have missed it if I hadn't heard of it here recently. They looked pretty much like the rest of the people sitting around except they had a pot, some plates, and a very poorly displayed sign.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 4:53 PM
horizontal rule
78

Like all of what people sitting around where? What kind of ""Food not Bombs" thing"?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 4:55 PM
horizontal rule
79

It was in front of the main Carnegie Library in Oakland. It was close to 90 today and the plaza was packed. I suppose they may have just been getting started, but they didn't have enough food for ten from what I could see.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 5:08 PM
horizontal rule
80

If I remember the last mention of Food Not Bombs here, the point was made that their project is as much about visibility as it is about providing food.

Mildly OT: Today on the NPR show The Splendid Table, which I know Heebie hates, there was a brief interview with Anthony Bourdain in which he was invited to opine about Alice Waters. Verdict: wince. I was glad he went into specifics, mentioning that when Waters was asked how poor people might be able address the fact that all that terrific, healthy, organic and locally produced food is like three times more expensive than the non-organic, she (apparently) replied that they might want to dispense with a cell phone account or that second set of Nikes. Ouch.

Well, we've talked about that before.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 5:56 PM
horizontal rule
81

If they wanted visibility, I think the sign shouldn't have been left flat on the ground. Maybe they didn't have a permit, so they wanted to be visible but not too visible.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 6:56 PM
horizontal rule
82

Unwanted advice: I'm not sure why you think sounding like a meth addict will help you sell a house on Craigslist, but spending 3/4ths of the ad explaining why you want to sell while not mentioning how many bathrooms the house has is a very good start. Moving swiftly away from approximately standard punctuation and spelling after the first sentence is also great.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 7:53 PM
horizontal rule
83

Only 11 minutes left on the desk! No bids.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 7:53 PM
horizontal rule
84

Sadly, it's about 6" too wide for where it would go. I did go so far as to get a shipping quote from the seller.


Posted by: Mr. Blandings | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 7:56 PM
horizontal rule
85

Bidding has ended on this item.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 8:09 PM
horizontal rule
86

Sadly, it's about 6" too wide for where it would go.

What if you put it in the other way?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 8:09 PM
horizontal rule
87

Did anybody find out what the reserve was? Alameida said something upthread about $1800, but that sounded like a guess.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 8:14 PM
horizontal rule
88

What's the functional difference between the minimum bid and the reserve?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 9:15 PM
horizontal rule
89

we don't find out the reserve until, during the course of active bidding, the reserve is met, at which point the "the reserve has not yet been met" red sign disappears. I didn't check out all the specifics of the auction carefully enough at the start--they put "eames" as a general lure-people-in descriptor, and it's actually by john keal, but real. i'm surprised no one bid. partner's desk, finished on both sides...it's in hemet CA with $150 shipping. I still can't see the reserve being less than 1800. striped mahogany! I don't know, the business of mid-century furniture is obviously different in california, where supply is plentiful, than over here in good ol' ainraN. I could sell it here for close to 3,000 ainriaN dollars, prolly. I have a tiger mahogany desk for sale for 2800 right now, but a vast roll-top from 1910 with gorgeous paneling and an abundance of organizational niches. perfect for colonial administration.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 9:41 PM
horizontal rule
90

it is astonishingly similar to this one, also shown in the adjacent photos in the photostream.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 9:45 PM
horizontal rule
91

45: Classic article. "It was all fun and games when they were just whipping up good old-fashioned ethnic hatred, but now shit's gotten real!" I wonder what that guy made of The Rock and Goldberg.


Posted by: DS | Link to this comment | 07-10-11 10:22 PM
horizontal rule
92

80: Some commenter at Kissing Suzy Kolber compared Anthony Bourdain to Dr. Rockzo, the rock 'n' roll clown: "I do have done cocaine!" I didn't take him all that seriously before, but that pretty much killed it.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:43 AM
horizontal rule
93

||

Good morning, Gracie. Now it's time for morning maniac music.

Kevin Drum

We blew through the debt ceiling May 16th. Commenters:"The reason the markets aren't panicking is..."

Kevin Smith (yes Virginia, the markets are panicking)

5-yr indexed t-bills negative interest rates, cheaper than cash

Barry Rittholz Look out below Italy Edition see also:Krugman "Fall of Rome"

Conclusion: No matter what US does on debt ceiling, bond markets think the rest of the world is gonna fall harder, faster, farther

"Look what's happening out in the streets"

|>


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:47 AM
horizontal rule
94

I'm back in town, and have a handful of posts, but I have to re-overcome my suspicion that they're dumb.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:57 AM
horizontal rule
95

Pfff. That's never stopped the people who write Two and Half Men


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:02 AM
horizontal rule
96

That show is stunningly dumb.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:03 AM
horizontal rule
97

And they don't let that stop them. It's kind of inspiring.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:10 AM
horizontal rule
98

92: if you look under "overcompensating" in the dictionary you will find a picture of Anthony Bourdain. He seems to be aware that he spends his working life wearing a ridiculous hat and worrying about herbs and sauces and desserts, and is compensating for this by trying to sound as much as he can like a cross between Red Adair and Iggy Pop.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:20 AM
horizontal rule
99

98: ...a cross between Red Adair and Iggy Pop.

I'm not sure that combination would be feasible, even if Red were still with us, but I'd certainly watch at least the pilot of a reality show about it.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:29 AM
horizontal rule
100

If I had a design-inspired website, I'd call it "The Designa Monologues".


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:52 AM
horizontal rule
101

I'm not sure how to spell Designa to make the joke most transparent, though.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:52 AM
horizontal rule
102

101: Make the font do the work?


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:56 AM
horizontal rule
103

I just got two new dry erase boards, possibly designed by John Keal.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:05 AM
horizontal rule
104

Does somebody have a drill I could borrow?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:07 AM
horizontal rule
105

99: I think it would work best as one of those 1990s natural-disaster films, like "Twister". In order to make it Oscar bait, he would probably have to fall into a drug-induced downward spiral in act 2, only to be saved and returned to sanity by the love of a good woman.
Pitch: it's "The Hurt Locker" meets "Walk the Line".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
106

||

Assuming that Harper One is Prime Minister of Canada, what happened to Harpers Two through Six?

|>


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
107

"Only one man can, shirtless, complain about Alice Waters and GQ's restaurant critic Alan Richman on a burning oil rig in the Bermuda Triangle.

"This summer, he's going Off the Menu."

You can just PayPal me the story fee.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:37 AM
horizontal rule
108

88: What's the functional difference between the minimum bid and the reserve?

It might be too late to reply to this, but: I'm a little rusty on eBay, but basically the seller (if s/he chooses to have a reserve) sets an amount -- invisible to bidders -- below which no bid can actually win.

So it goes like this: bidder places bid of $449, and specifies that s/he is willing to go as high as, say, $800. (Actually the bidder places a max bid of $800, I believe, and this shows up as the minimum bid). If Bidder2 bids $500, Bidder1's bid (which can go up to $800) automatically goes to $500 + whatever the increment established for the auction is -- say $525. Bidder3 bids $550. Bidder1's bid then goes to $575.

Bidder1's bid keeps trumping the last bid by $25 increments until the bidding hits $800, at which point Bidder1 drops out after $800 (or else ups his/her max bid). If Bidder2 and Bidder3 have also specified maximum bids, the bidding can go up rapid-fire among all of them by $25 increments, until various of them drop out because their max has been met and exceeded.

But that has nothing to do with the reserve, because the reserve might be $1800, so the bidders have just been spinning their wheels: they've effectively been trying to find out what the hell the seller's seekrit reserve is. In a way, they're bidding against the reserve.

Some sellers will tell you (privately) what the reserve is if you ask. Some won't, because they want to generate bidding action. If a bidder knows the max s/he is willing to go to is $1000 and the reserve is $1800, s/he is just not going to bid to begin with, and the seller doesn't want that.

I'm dubious about Alameida's $1800 reserve estimate (whether or not the desk is actually worth that) just because it's 4 times higher than the starting bid: you're going to be annoying a lot of bidders if they keep upping their max bids and still don't hit the reserve; they're going to drop out in disgust. Also, since many eBay bidders don't start bidding until the very end of the auction's run-time, the clock may well just run out before the reserve is met -- I'd say it's generally not wise from the seller's perspective to have a reserve that much higher than the starting bid.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:06 AM
horizontal rule
109

Holy crap, that was long. Sorry! Apologies also if any of it sounded like I was speaking to simpletons -- I was just typing as I thought it through.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
110

Many of us are the first in their family to go to college.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
111

||

Sorry to hijack, but is Rauch's piece over at Sullivan's a parody? Is there backstory I don't know, like he was caught sockpuppeting and now he's permanently aggrieved about blogs? Did I just fall for the most basic taunting ever and I shouldn't waste any thought on it?

|>


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:21 AM
horizontal rule
112

Did I just fall for the most basic taunting ever

Mmmaybe. I don't know from Rauch, not to remember him, so maybe there's more to it than that. But it looks like trolling to me.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:28 AM
horizontal rule
113

Well, if there is any crowd well-trained to ignore trolls, it should be us.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
114

Interestingly, McMegan has a thing on the Rauch piece also.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
115

111: Huh. Maybe Sullivan's blog needs page views now that it's moved to the Daily Beast.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 11:22 AM
horizontal rule
116

What, precisely, is the value proposition, much less the appeal, of Andrew Sullivan's thinking writing typing? It seems outlandish that he is as prominent as Josh Marshall, or more so, among blog-types of similar vintage. He's so officious, disingenuous and transparently self-serving; he's the vanguard that Mc/Ardle follows, consciously or not.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
117

116: It's an ongoing mystery. I note in passing that he was featured on the cover of a recent Harvard Magazine issue: I was a bit startled, amused, confused, say what? I haven't read it, but you know, there is that. Apparently.

Not that it necessarily has much to do with his blogging.

He did some outstanding work on, erm, a recent important series of events. I didn't follow it myself. On Egypt?


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
118

117: I never look at the cover. I throw the magazine out after confirming the unfamiliarity of the names in my class notes.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 11:48 AM
horizontal rule
119

He's so officious, disingenuous and transparently self-serving the former editor of The New Republic, back from before there were blogs and before Josh Marshall was a writer at all. And Marshall has evolved into more of a a journalist or newsroom editor type (no books, other writers more prominent on his own blog), while Sullivan is free to write prose without the obligation to be informed.


Posted by: eliot | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 11:49 AM
horizontal rule
120

89: "Eames" is an almost meaningless term on ebay. It means the item in question was made between 1930 and 1980, or was designed to look like it.


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
121

I'm not a good writer, so to be clear, I was trying to say I think Sullivan is a good writer and that's why he's popular, in addition to being a Villager in good standing.


Posted by: eliot | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
122

The article in 45, if intended as a parody of both pompous moralistic sports writing and Buckley-ism, is truly a fabulous acheivement. Or what Stormcrow said.

Mumbling into your port about how the world has gone to seed ever since Nikolai Volkoff and the Iron Sheik retired really takes mumbling into your port to a new level.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:05 PM
horizontal rule
123

Sullivan had to overcome the less than marvelous period of his tenure as editor of The New Republic, I think.

I've read some Sullivan posts that are really quite good. For every one of those, there's another that defies description, so I've never felt an urge to actually follow him.

118: I've been trying to figure out how to stop receiving the paper copy. Surely this should be possible: to switch to receiving the online/emailed version only. I really don't need or want a paper copy.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
124

Holy shit, that wrestling piece was done by a professor of English at UVA. Surely at least one way to loosen up the academic job market would be to murder a few people with tenure, so why not start with that guy.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:11 PM
horizontal rule
125

Holy shit, that wrestling piece was done by a professor of English at UVA. Surely at least one way to loosen up the academic job market would be to murder a few people with tenure, so why not start with that guy make candidates wrestle for tenure-track positions, with named chairs put up for grabs annually in special formats at an Academo-Wrestlemania: Cage, Hardcore, Iron Man, Tables Ladders and Chairs and, of course, for positions not less prestigious than that of Eliot Professor of Greek, Hell in a Cell.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:22 PM
horizontal rule
126

Surely no one wants to see a bunch of greased up and half naked aspiring academics in a ring.

Or maybe someone does, but that's niche porn at the level of elbow-fetishists.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:24 PM
horizontal rule
127

Not everyone, surely, but people who weren't necessarily interested in the wrestling itself or the greased half-nakedness ("Thou crownest the year with thy goodness; and thy paths drop fatness....") could be drawn in with backstage intrigues: Did the Citator plagiarize his job talk from a Festschrift edited by tag-team champions Race, Class and Gender? When will we see the brooding, tweedy Administrator's revenge?


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
128

125: I remember fondly when, in a cross-promotion, Mike Tyson was up for the Wykeham Professorship of Logic.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
129

128: That ref was in on it.

For those wanting the joke explained:

At a party that same year held by fashion designer Fernando Sanchez, Ayer, then 77, confronted Mike Tyson who was forcing himself upon the (then little-known) model Naomi Campbell. When Ayer demanded that Tyson stop, the boxer said: "Do you know who the fuck I am? I'm the heavyweight champion of the world," to which Ayer replied: "And I am the former Wykeham Professor of Logic. We are both pre-eminent in our field. I suggest that we talk about this like rational men". Ayer and Tyson then began to talk, while Naomi Campbell slipped out.

Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
130

125 et seq.: I miss Labs.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 12:34 PM
horizontal rule
131

He's so officious, disingenuous and transparently self-serving; he's the vanguard that Mc/Ardle follows, consciously or not.

I don't find him more disingenuous and self-serving than other pontificators. And unlike McArdle, he gives the impression that he'd genuinely like to understand how the world works, and that he's got some of the intellectual tools to work it out.

Sure, he'll never talk sensibly about The Bell Curve, but how many of us are able to face up to our intellectual failures?

He links some fun stuff, he makes some good observations, he's fairly unpredictable and he's willing to give opposing views a fair hearing.

Possibly most important for me, he's a conservative whose work I can tolerate reading regularly. I mean, hell, back in the pre-blogosphere days, I used to read George Will and Charles Krauthammer all the time.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
132

116: He's a sufficiently good writer that when he writes about something where you already agree with him, it sounds good.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:24 PM
horizontal rule
133

OT: Trimming nose hairs should be done either using a mirror or blunted scissors. Possibly both. That is all.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:40 PM
horizontal rule
134

133: And definitely not on the bus, even if you say thanks afterward.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:45 PM
horizontal rule
135

||

Fuck, I was scared about this on the 1st of June when we hit 100 too early. (I know others are hot too.)

DFW starts heating up and drying out, the earth and concrete hold the heat, we get an inversion, a permanent high-pressure that just keeps getting bigger and stronger. So we were 101-105 this week, and forecast for up to 107-108 next week. Getting scarey.

And that high pressure circulation eventually draws moisture up from the Gulf and the humidity and dew point keep rising. Currently 65 degrees DP, which adds 2-5 heat index points. Heat Index gets 110+ and we are lucky if the HI ever gets below 90.

I remember 1980, when the temperature rarely dropped below 90 at dawn and the HI rarely under 100. Deadly and crazifying.

|>


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:45 PM
horizontal rule
136

Nobody is actually supposed to live in Dallas. It was built as a practical joke.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
137

Surely McManus is consistent with the humor?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
138

I don't find him more disingenuous and self-serving than other pontificators. And unlike McArdle, he gives the impression that he'd genuinely like to understand how the world works, and that he's got some of the intellectual tools to work it out.

Also unlike McArdle, he often follows up his mistakes and ridiculous overreactions to things by saying "Whoops, that was a mistake. I've changed my mind", instead of "What all of you who know way more than me about this didn't realize is, I was actually right, if you look really hard for a potential situation in which I might have been right".


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
139

138 gets it exactly right. Comparison with McMegan makes anyone look good, though, since she is the most annoying (n.b., not worst, just most annoying) person on the internet.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 2:04 PM
horizontal rule
140

zunguzungu, which someone linked from here is interesting. rortybomb, causal inference, speigel's english feed, the awl.

I've been looking for good writing about North Africa and the rest of the arab world; has anyone found interesting sources? French OK.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
141

lw, you looking for stuff with broader import or pleasant travelogues? I enjoyed a couple Yemen travelogues, but wouldn't say they went deeper than that. Lemmeno if you want names.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
142

Oh, and those were, like, books. Not blogs.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
143

140: Aqoul is good, although they don't seem to be updating very frequently these days.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 2:42 PM
horizontal rule
144

re: Ayer. I was in the dank sekrit dungeons under the [place that I work], just a few days ago, with some colleagues. And I found* Ayer's papers/letters/manuscripts. Which meant I had to tell my colleagues the Ayer/Tyson story. Turns out Ayer had really really tiny handwriting.

Also, fighting for academic jobs? I could go for that. Fucking right.

* not that they are lost, I just didn't expect them to be on the shelf next to the thing we were looking for.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 3:16 PM
horizontal rule
145

Also, fighting for academic jobs? I could go for that. Fucking right.

Yes, well, you have significantly more martial arts training than the average academic, so you're presumably at a considerable advantage under a fighting-for-jobs system.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
146

re: 145

Heh. Although I did used to know a couple of philosophy grad students who boxed at a fairly serious amateur level. But I'd guess I'd have more chance of making it to the short-list under a system of academic blood-tanistry than I do now under a system that favours a combination of hard-work, luck, and networking/nepotism.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
147

Actually, gloomily, it'd make no difference. Younger, better, more ambitious people would still get it. Still, one can pretend.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 3:49 PM
horizontal rule
148

I know! People always say things like "violence isn't the solution", but I'm pretty sure it is a solution that gives me better odds than a solution based on effort. Are you sure we can't settle this by fighting? Why do people keep insisting on reasoning and merit and laws?


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 4:22 PM
horizontal rule
149

148: Violence never solves anything, but an ashtray to the head will rid one of certain graduate students.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 4:37 PM
horizontal rule
150

Violence is never the answer.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 4:42 PM
horizontal rule
151

144: I hope the sekrit dungeons aren't really dank, ttaM. Because that's just no good, you know.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:07 PM
horizontal rule
152

Re 151

Heh. No, they are quite airy, and not even that dark. Fancy meters for humidity and the like, too. They are underground, though, and there are cages for particularly precious things.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:18 PM
horizontal rule
153

They've been doing this for a while, to be fair.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:19 PM
horizontal rule
154

[T]here are cages for particularly ... precious things.

Said the College Keeper, a sepulchral mourn from the eyeless void within his hood, and drew down his sleeves once more over his slack and livid talons.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:29 PM
horizontal rule
155

I know. I was just amused by the "dank".

What happens to things like Ayer's papers? Are they eventually scanned and archived or something? Are they just being stored for safekeeping? Or -- are they available for scholars to consult. Perhaps the last. Or all three.

I'm at loose ends; it's quite hot here. I've just finished making a green bean salad which has to chill and marinate for a bit. Tomorrow is due to be approximately 100 degrees F. It's a little grim.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
156

It's hot, and I got a horrible cold. That made me tired which makes me feel even stupider than normal.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:37 PM
horizontal rule
157

156: You think you have it bad -- one of the tomato plants in the garden fell over and is crushing the swiss chard.

!!

It is, however, too hot for me to be willing to do anything about it until at least tomorrow evening (when it will be hotter). My housemate may be mad if I let the chard be killed.

Hark! Thunder.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:41 PM
horizontal rule
158

Charred chard?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
159

Thanks for 108, btw, P.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:04 PM
horizontal rule
160

It makes sense that air conditioners would be more likely to fail on the hottest days, and that the consequent peak in service calls would overburden the repair services so that it might take them 16 hours, for example, to respond, but THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT ANY COOLER.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:16 PM
horizontal rule
161

It's very nice here after the storm blew through.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
162

159: I hope it helped. As I thought about it a bit more, the weird thing about the automatic upping of bids for bidders who have placed max bid amounts is that you don't necessarily see the action registered in the bidding history -- the bidding history can look mysteriously strange. But that's tangential to the business of the reserve.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:24 PM
horizontal rule
163

161: Do you mind if a guy and two cats crash on your couch?


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:29 PM
horizontal rule
164

Re 108, I thought that if someone placed a bid higher than the reserve, the price automatically went up to the reserve, and the auction continued from there.

Also, I haven't read most of this thread (boy is is annoying when someone drops in and says that), but I see that no one has mentioned sniping. Use a sniping service, people! Don't run up the price for no good reason!


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:41 PM
horizontal rule
165

164.1: Yeah, I wasn't sure about that. I don't know. I'd think, yeah, it would. But I'm not sure.

I can't think of the last time I saw an auction in which the first bid placed was, say, $1800 instead of the starting bid of $449. So I don't know.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:51 PM
horizontal rule
166

164: "First you gotta catch the snipe. Come back when you get one. We'll all wait here."


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 6:59 PM
horizontal rule
167

I'm not 100% sure either, because I only ever bid by snipe, and usually on things (used clothing) that wouldn't have a reserve. But I did win a bike for which I was the only bidder, and I got it for the reserve price, which was $150 lower than my willing-to-pay bid. For that auction I had read about how the reserve price works, and I think I'm remembering correctly.


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:15 PM
horizontal rule
168

It's like a trip to the beach for the cats.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:42 PM
horizontal rule
169

I don't have AC right now, and except for a welcome three-year stint recently, I haven't had AC in New York since 2000.

So: regular cold baths. As often as you like. It's not as though you're in the droughty West, so you might as well fill up that bathtub and soak. A half-hour in a tepid bath will really bring your temperature down.

Related: Ice in a washcloth. Apply particularly to the nape of the neck.

Shift locations, even though it hurts. The stoop may be cooler, may have a breeze! And of course, your public facilities (work, the library, malls) will have blasting AC. During the worst heat waves, look for evening hours. If you have roof access in your building, go up there.

Most important: those of us who live without AC learn to differentiate between hot days and horrible days. Today was and tomorrow is scheduled to be horrible. However! Wednesday is supposed to be much nicer: only 80-85. Surely we can hold out until then! See: endurance and fortitude (aka "talking yourself into a stiff upper lip") can see you through an AC-less summer!


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 7:55 PM
horizontal rule
170

I'm glad this place has air conditioning, but I wish my landlady (who lives in the house above where all the climate stuff is set) would run it a little lower.* I seem to get unusually cold when I sleep, and the result is that I'm sleeping in long-sleeves when it's 80-90 outside.

I've been to desert areas in the summer for hiking/backpacking where it was so hot that we moved only in the early morning or the evening, so this isn't the hottest weather I've ever been in by temp, but with the humidity it really is incredible, especially when I walk home around (just before/after) sunset and it doesn't feel like anything has let up. Moving from the climate control of libraries certainly increases the shock of stepping outside. I'm still enjoying the novelty of not always carrying some kind of warm clothing, though.

*I've been in colder/cool areas so long that I have to consciously not confuse turning the AC down with turning the heat up. The last month I was in Vancouver it was never above 70, down to the 50s at night and I never ran the heat. Of course being on the third floor instead of in a basement helps.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 8:05 PM
horizontal rule
171

Apply particularly to the nape of the neck.

Inner wrists, too -- or run cold water over them from the tap. That's my favorite trick.


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 8:23 PM
horizontal rule
172

you all are making me happy I'm going to martha's vineyard, but sadder that I'm going to south carolina. oh well, not much worse than narnia and it's not as bad as central india or dfw.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 8:49 PM
horizontal rule
173

169,171: Thanks! I've done this before for several summers, although not quite as bad as today.</whine>


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 8:53 PM
horizontal rule
174

I second JM's bath advice. I spent an August in Madrid (running joke: no one who lives in Madrid stays here in August) in AC-free student housing. My nightly sleeplessness was eventually calmed by spending an hour each night in a tepid bath with a book.

It certainly helped that there was good, strong coffee to be had in the morning.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 9:00 PM
horizontal rule
175

I never had ac is West Africa, but a ceiling fan made all the difference in the world. During power outages, it was nearly impossible to fall asleep, no matter how many cool showers I got up to take. Plus the folks next door had a generator. So sometimes it would be just as bright as usual through the curtains, plus, the noise of the generator, plus their extra active goats.


Posted by: Jimmy Pongo | Link to this comment | 07-11-11 10:05 PM
horizontal rule
176

re: 155

Things mostly just sit on shelves, but are available for consultation by academics and readers. There are lots of ongoing projects -- funded by donors, academic research councils, the state, or in some cases commercial companies -- to photograph and make available online various sets of material. However, the [place I work] suffers a bit from an embarrassment of riches. We have so much important stuff that only a small percentage of it is currently available in this way.

When you have 10,000* medieval manuscripts -- and where other world famous research institutions may have 50 -- it's not quite so easy to make them all available, and that goes double for more recent stuff (inc. private papers). I know, because I'm a very junior member of a committee overseeing a new joint project with the nacitaV, that other places with similarly large collections face a similar problem.

As it happens, I know (because, erm, I'm the one doing it) that some 20th c. stuff in that subject area may be subject to some funding bids to try and get it online, but there are lots of funding bids and only a minority of them get funded.

* I don't know the actual number, but it differs from other places by that sort of order of magnitude


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-12-11 12:05 AM
horizontal rule
177

Arrived in Cincinnati for a work meeting last night and the dewpoint was 80 degrees F which is pretty insane. Not that common even further south, but there was a pod of it yesterday along the lower Ohio Valley. A meteorologist from Louisville's explanation included a unique element which I'm not sure passes the smell test.

blame it on the corn. specifically the corn belt. This air mass developed over the weekend in the corn fields of Iowa and Kansas. When corn reaches its silking stage, the plants put out a huge amount of water vapor. Normally the atmosphere will disperse it, but when a huge ridge of high pressure forms that vapor is trapped and due to the high the air heats up. While we have corn in KY, the density of fields is much higher in the Plains hence the corn belt.
Maybe, but does not seem it would involve enough moisture to be relevant. He also mentions the that in general it has been very wet here (and in the corn areas) with excess soil moisture, which certainly *can* be relevant, so once again, maybe. Intensive corn production, improving your life in so many ways.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-12-11 4:36 AM
horizontal rule