Re: Talk of mysteries!

1

nor do they fly off with children

What, never? Ripoff.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:27 PM
horizontal rule
2

No small, brown babies clutched in their beaks?


Posted by: Mr. Blandings | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:30 PM
horizontal rule
3

Yeah, they're more likely to eat the baby where they find it.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:34 PM
horizontal rule
4

an adult can quickly gulp down several pounds of decomposing flesh

I'm think Arby's. Anyone in?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
5

2: This only happens in the Guacamole Islands.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
6

2: you're going to make me cry.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:46 PM
horizontal rule
7

I mean, about the red tape in the bush, not the death of Peter Falk.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:47 PM
horizontal rule
8

5: not to be pedantic, but the Flamenco Dancers of Death were protected by the Guacamole Act. Vince never reveals where he encountered them, other than to say, "the bush". Would you like me to recite the entire movie? No? Too late. You might want to avoid my house for the next ninety seven minutes.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:49 PM
horizontal rule
9

8: Yo tango agua fria, Ari.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:50 PM
horizontal rule
10

Er, vW.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:51 PM
horizontal rule
11

10: actually, the "v" is accented. It's "Vw".


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 6:54 PM
horizontal rule
12
If the wasp became a threat, it would join a host of species from Asia on the government's most unwanted list of harmful plants, insects and animals.

I'm against it.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 7:03 PM
horizontal rule
13

Oh, Jesus, pigs!


Posted by: Mr. Blandings | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 7:06 PM
horizontal rule
14

I'm ashamed to say that I had forgotten that it was the Guacamole Act of 1917. What kind of historian forgets something like that?


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 7:13 PM
horizontal rule
15

That's all history is, right? Memorizing dates?


Posted by: Mr. Blandings | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 7:17 PM
horizontal rule
16

There's also acquiring asthma from the moldering archival materials. But really, one only goes to the archives in search of more dates, so I guess you got it in one.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 7:19 PM
horizontal rule
17

goes to the archives in search of more dates

History keeps one regular.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 7:56 PM
horizontal rule
18

I had never heard of The In-Laws prior to this thread.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:04 PM
horizontal rule
19

The In-Laws! Great flick.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
20

Serpentine Shelly Stanley. Serpentine!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
21

OT: The Wisconsin recall elections are three called for R, one called for D, one within a 100 votes, and one where D is ahead though the counting hasn't gotten very far at all.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:12 PM
horizontal rule
22

And the only natural predators of the wasps are radiation-enhanced Komodo dragons on roller skates.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:12 PM
horizontal rule
23

21: The Wisconsin recall elections are three called for R

See? I knew it was a dumb move not to hold the capitol. They were all so naive.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:15 PM
horizontal rule
24

The other two look very close. I'm following it here. District 8 just got very close, probably because the Milwaukee votes were both counted first and strongly Democrat.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
25

18: Neither had I. But then all the old people starting groaning about their aches and pains in the other thread and I figured it was a generational thing.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
26

Don't these people have computers? This is going to take all night to count, probably longer as a recall doesn't seem out of the bounds of possibility. I'm going to sleep.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:27 PM
horizontal rule
27

24: 8 is going to be tough, only 1 of 11 precincts in for Waukesha County which is the one that had the vote issues in the spring and which is strongly Republican. Fortunately only part of the county is in the district. Will only hold if the Milwaukee precincts showing as not counted are "real" or phantom (from watching prior results in Wis., many counties have a lot of "precincts" that are not standard and have very few or no voters and make it look like more votes are outstanding than is in fact the case).


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:30 PM
horizontal rule
28

Does anyone else get that sense that, even in Wisconsin, Republicans are outworking Democrats at the moment. I suppose it makes sense. When Bush was president, the Democrats enjoyed a huge enthusiasm margin over the Republicans. Why shouldn't the inverse be true now that a Kenyan socialist has turned the White House black? (No, I'm not going to bother getting into whether Obama has let down the Democratic rank and file or vice versa. I'm just observing that Republicans seem more mobilized for now.)


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:36 PM
horizontal rule
29

They just called a second seat for the Democrats. One race left.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:41 PM
horizontal rule
30

Ah, some more real results from Milwaukee push the lead in 8 up to 1,700 and in 18 Dem up 1,200 with only 3 precincts left so that looks good done. However, Waukesha is late again and will probably come in 70/30 R and swing it (the primary town in district 8 there went 8400 3200 for that asshole Prosser in the spring). Fucking exurbs.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:45 PM
horizontal rule
31

Looking at some more past results, the JPS-o-meter says <10% of victory there. Sorry to be a downer. Will probably not be that close in the end.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:55 PM
horizontal rule
32

Who is doing the counting in the area where the Supreme Court race had some possible irregularities? This isn't another case of "I count on my personal laptop which no one has access to but me" is it?* Because if it is, it would not be surprising if just barely more people who are needed to win will turn out to have cast ballots that just happen to have gotten counted at the end for the Republican. No, I'm not paranoid.

*Note: I don't know if that report turned out to be accurate.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:56 PM
horizontal rule
33

Waukesha was the city where the Republican politician took the votes home with her and then brought them back the next morning to reveal that Prosser had managed to win, right?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:56 PM
horizontal rule
34

32, 33: It was in Waukesha county, but the "missing" votes were from Brookfield which is not in the relevant district.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 8:59 PM
horizontal rule
35

But the same effed up County Clerk with the personal laptop process collating them. (The town counts themselves were done quickly and accurately from all evidence, it was the countywide compilation that was slow.)


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 9:01 PM
horizontal rule
36

I guess that's better for democracy, then, even if the Republican wins. Absent any knowledge of Wisconsin local politics, it seems like 6 recalls and 2 wins, though not enough, is actually an accomplishment. As long as the Dems hold next week. And unless the pick-ups "should" have been Dem anyway.

Honestly, I'm not all that much of a fan of some of the Progressive era structural reforms, but a Congressional recall after the debt ceiling vote sounds appealing. Or some kind of no confidence vote that triggers elections, or a referendum, or something. Progressives/liberals might still lose, but at least there'd be some kind of participation to it.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 9:04 PM
horizontal rule
37

Waukesha in (10/11). 4K swing to Republican (actually better than I feared). Only hope is if some of the 12 remaining Milwaukee County precincts are "real".


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 9:20 PM
horizontal rule
38

Everyone seems to agree that it's over, just not calling it yet.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 9:54 PM
horizontal rule
39

38: Yes, up to 5K lead. There might be some tightening with Milwaukee votes, but not enough. The Reps squeaked by in 2008. The two the Dems won were similarly close in 2008 but were more rural/town/small city.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08- 9-11 10:20 PM
horizontal rule
40

I knew it wouldn't work. There are a lot of fucked up people in Wisconsin.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 7:02 AM
horizontal rule
41

I think I can, I think I can, I think I can. At least as long as there aren't too many fucked up people around.


Posted by: Opinionated Little Engine That Couldn't | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 7:05 AM
horizontal rule
42

The lesson is that you have to believe that you can. Not that some first term Senator with the gift of the gab can.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
43

Can do what?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 7:14 AM
horizontal rule
44

There are a lot of fucked up people in Wisconsin.

Sure, but is there any state you could substitute that would make that statement false?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 7:16 AM
horizontal rule
45

Can do what?

Whatever you want.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 7:21 AM
horizontal rule
46

I believe I can fly. And have sex with teenagers.


Posted by: R. Kelly | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 7:25 AM
horizontal rule
47

some first term Senator with the gift of the gab can.

"I don't even know what a gab can is."


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 8:05 AM
horizontal rule
48

47: If you don't know, you can't afford it.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 08-10-11 8:16 AM
horizontal rule