Re: Coffee Miscellany

1

A curious delight explained

A compelling analysis!


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 9:04 PM
horizontal rule
2

We are all urple sometimes.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 9:08 PM
horizontal rule
3

We all, I assert, know this phenomenon.

Sometimes known as "Why don't you; yes, but."


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 9:21 PM
horizontal rule
4

I find myself amused by the "Styles" section of Curzon's Wikipedia entry:

1859-1886: The Hon. George Nathaniel Curzon
1886-1898: The Hon. George Nathaniel Curzon, MP
1898-1899: The Rt Hon. The Lord Curzon of Kedleston
1899-1901: His Excellency The Rt Hon. The Lord Curzon of Kedleston, GCSI, GCIE
1901-1905: His Excellency The Rt Hon. The Lord Curzon of Kedleston, GCSI, GCIE, PC
1905-1911: The Rt Hon. The Lord Curzon of Kedleston, GCSI, GCIE, PC
1911-1916: The Rt Hon. The Earl Curzon of Kedleston, GCSI, GCIE, PC
1916-1921: The Rt Hon. The Earl Curzon of Kedleston, KG, GCSI, GCIE, PC
1921-1925: The Most Hon. The Marquess Curzon of Kedleston, KG, GCSI, GCIE, PC


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 9:29 PM
horizontal rule
5

Marquess outranks Earl? I thought a Marquess was more like a Baronet. So confusing--it's like trying to remember whether a straight beats a flush, or whether they're in fact different names for the same thing. I'm going to bed.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 9:56 PM
horizontal rule
6

Sweet post, dear neb.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 9:59 PM
horizontal rule
7

5: So it would seem:

In the British Isles the title ranks below a duke and above an earl

Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 10:18 PM
horizontal rule
8

The reason is also interesting:

In times past, the distinction between an earl and a marquess was that a marquess's land, called a march, was on the border of the country, while an earl's land, called a county, often wasn't. Because of this, a marquess was trusted to defend and fortify against potentially hostile neighbors and was thus more important and ranked higher than an earl.

Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 10:20 PM
horizontal rule
9

There was an Earl of March, the first of whom won the title by killing the king and taking up with the queen (not in that order).


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 10:46 PM
horizontal rule
10

Between this Earl of March and the Duke of Earl, I just give up. Too confusing.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 11:36 PM
horizontal rule
11

This is the real reason we had a Revolution.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 10-18-11 11:52 PM
horizontal rule
12

5: For the longest time as a kid, I thought "baron" had to be a pretty impressive title. After all, badasses like Baron Karza and Baron Harkonnen and Baron Samedi were rocking it, right? Finding out that "baron" was actually just a step above being a commoner was a major letdown.


Posted by: LORD CASTOCK | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:23 AM
horizontal rule
13

8: hence the similar distinction between a Markgraf and a Landgraf, I should think.

I am disappointed that neb didn't quote The Masque of Balliol:

My name is George Nathaniel Curzon,
I am a most superior person.
My cheeks are pink, my hair is sleek,
I dine at Blenheim twice a week.

Which, I see, also includes, as well as Toynbee, this one:

Positivists ever talk in s-
Uch an epic style as DAWKINS;
Creeds are nought and MAN is all,
Spell Him with a capital.

...referring to a completely different Dawkins.

9: actually there were two lots of Earls of March, one Scottish (guarding the English March) and one English (the Welsh March), also known as the Marcher Lords. Neither should be confused with the Earls of Mar, of whom there are also two, both Scottish, due to an argument.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:29 AM
horizontal rule
14

DUB ME NOW THE FAQIR OF IPI,
OFFER TO MAKE ME SHEIKH OF FAO,
I SHOULD REMAIN INERT AND SLEEPY,
JUST THE SAME AS YOU SEE ME NOW.
LION OF JUDAH? SHAH OF PERSIA?
PARAMOUNT BEY OF TIMBUCTOO?
IF I'M TO BE ROUSED FROM MY INERTIA
I MUST BE MADE WALI OF PUSHT-I-KUH.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:32 AM
horizontal rule
15

Curzon, possibly the most pompous man in British history. Achievements: the Younghusband Mission, completely pointless recreational imperialism, making sure famine relief claimants weren't faking, starting an officer training scheme for Indian princes that led to a special commission that meant nobody had to take orders from you, opposing votes for women, defending the House of Lords veto, inventing Jordan and the Curzon line, occupying and then de-occupying south Persia, serial resigning, trying very hard to be prime minister.

Literally nothing he did wasn't either stupid, evil, or completely impermanent. Except for commissioning the Cenotaph, I guess. That's still there!


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:27 AM
horizontal rule
16

15: Honi soit qui mal y pense.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:57 AM
horizontal rule
17

I am not sure if it is entirely accurate, but I learned the hierarchy of the lords with the, uh, I forgot what the term is, anyway: very dull men eat brown bread. So, viscount, duke, marquess, earl, baron, baronet.


Posted by: parenthetical | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:06 AM
horizontal rule
18

A duke outranks a viscount. "Dull men eat very brown bread" works.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:08 AM
horizontal rule
19

I love you all SO MUCH but I have special feelings about neb. Sometimes I feel it in the area.


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:09 AM
horizontal rule
20

I love you all SO MUCH but I have special feelings about neb. Sometimes I feel it in the area. I had to comment twice about it. The area.


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:10 AM
horizontal rule
21

thanks for the never-to-be-used mnemonic! so helpful. no, it probably will actually come in handy when reading novels. like when everyone at that party doesn't realize that the "baron" is the duc du guermentes and they wrongly think he's some lowlife, allowing some bullshit viscount to enter the dining room before him. and later the hostess just refuses to believe it! total bitch!


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:27 AM
horizontal rule
22

OT: Even as the sort of savage who eats oatmeal for lunch (don't judge me), I would prefer an NYT Dining section comprised entirely of Jacques Pépin's notes on technique to another goddamned essay on the durance vile of being the restaurant critic for the most powerful newspaper in the U.S.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:28 AM
horizontal rule
23

22: oh god yes.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:40 AM
horizontal rule
24

thanks for the never-to-be-used mnemonic! so helpful.

You'll be grateful when ttaM tears off his mask at the next meetup and reveals himself to be the fifth Viscount of Severn and Thames.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 4:01 AM
horizontal rule
25

I LIKE CHEESE!


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 4:42 AM
horizontal rule
26

18: Oops, it's been a long time since I had to keep track of such things (it came in handy during the endless political history of England course I took in university). And then when I had a brief period of reading far too many regency romance novels. But that's not to be spoken of.


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 5:27 AM
horizontal rule
27

re: 24

I don't inherit the title unless my elder brother Freddie Victor Featherstonehaugh O'Cholmondeley nattarGcM dies first.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 5:48 AM
horizontal rule
28

What sort of rank entitles one to sign things with just the family/title name (e.g., "Bedford," "Clarence," etc.)? I always thought that would be sort of nicely convenient.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 5:57 AM
horizontal rule
29

28: any peerage, I think, allows you to sign with just your title - whether that's your surname or a geographical indication.

A baronet can't do it because he's just Sir Bob McManus, Bart., but even a relatively lowly peer like ttaM Aloysius de Vere McMenemy Stubfuttock nattarGcM, fifth viscount of Severn and Thames, can sign himself "Severn and Thames". Or m'colleague Pauly, third Baron Shore, can sign himself simply "Shore".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 6:01 AM
horizontal rule
30

28: "Duke" definitely does, as we learn from Lord Peter Wimsey's brother Denver.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 6:01 AM
horizontal rule
31

My dad always answered the phone "Hick speaking" excepting with our real last name. Maybe he is a peer and hasn't told me.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 6:25 AM
horizontal rule
32

You can sign whatever you like, surely. Especially as most signatures are illegible.


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 6:42 AM
horizontal rule
33

You all know far too much about this.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 7:11 AM
horizontal rule
34

Related: yesterday, I passed a wine-making establishment named something like Barren Hill Vineyards and thought, "Surely, they misspelled 'Baron', for who would want wine from a barren hill?"


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 7:19 AM
horizontal rule
35

The apple orchard where my homebrew club has its annual cider party is on Poor Farm Road. Only recently did I think about that as referring to "farm where the poor are sent" instead of "terrible farm".


Posted by: Nathan Williams | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 7:25 AM
horizontal rule
36

Actually, knowing almost nothing, I thought you kind of wanted nasty rocky infertile soil for vines -- that it toughened them up or something. So the literal reading might make sense.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 7:26 AM
horizontal rule
37

||


Before I write a stern letter to my new bank chastising them for allowing only alphanumeric characters for online banking passwords, is there any good reason for their policy? O computer experts, are special characters some kind of glitchy problem that makes network administrators' lives miserable?

Relatedly, I hate having my neighborhood bank swallowed up.

||>


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 7:38 AM
horizontal rule
38

Not really a good reason. There are common bad reasons (some characters require special handling in software for hashing, for html and URLs), but for well written software this should not be a problem. The availability of different special chars for typing and for hashing are I guess the biggest issue.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 7:53 AM
horizontal rule
39

There is no good reason for that policy. A recent xkcd spoke to this.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 7:55 AM
horizontal rule
40

wait, I thought you held xkcd in contempt. How did you know that, and why cite it?


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:00 AM
horizontal rule
41

Neb keeps his favorite comics close, and his contempted comics closer.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:03 AM
horizontal rule
42

Stack Overflow on this question.

My last three banks--Bank of America, Fidelity, and a local credit union--have only taken alphanumeric characters for my password.


Posted by: Criminally Bulgur | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:03 AM
horizontal rule
43

40: it was linked on metafilter, and it was one of those strips where the guy is actually right, and wasn't being a cock about something.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:10 AM
horizontal rule
44

I read somewhere ages ago the menmonic Do Men Ever Visit Boston for
Duke
Marquis
Earl
Viscount
Baron


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:13 AM
horizontal rule
45

pwned, I see.


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
46

Nosflow had a *good* reason for knowing about that particular xkcd strip.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
47

Wait, I thought the xkcd strip was about the policies that force you to include a non-alphanumeric character, not about ones that forbid it?


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:21 AM
horizontal rule
48

These "your password must include at least one lowercase letter, one uppercase letter, one numeral, and one non-alphanumeric character" things annoy me. But not as much as helpful IT people upgrading a cluster and breaking all my software just when I'm trying to finish a paper!


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
49

47: maybe. These details are below me. Really I'd be fine with just alphanumeric characters + space, so long as there isn't a length limit, but if you want a non-alphanumeric, non-space character too, that's easily done.

For a while the password for my wireless network was "how dare you ask to use my wireless!".


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:24 AM
horizontal rule
50

"how dare you ask to use my wireless!"

Shouldn't that technically be "how dare you ask to use my wireless?!"


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:29 AM
horizontal rule
51

I thought you kind of wanted nasty rocky infertile soil for vines -- that it toughened them up or something.

A wine named Sue.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:29 AM
horizontal rule
52

50: well, maybe that's why I changed it.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:32 AM
horizontal rule
53

I would prefer an NYT Dining section comprised entirely of Jacques Pépin's notes on technique

I find him so charming. His autobiography is a good read.


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:32 AM
horizontal rule
54

Is it etiquettal (in formal contexts, of course) to introduce oneself as Mr./Ms. Surname? I'm not sure if I brought that rule over from Japanese, where -san is an honorific and therefore using it for yourself would be gauche.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:33 AM
horizontal rule
55

My current wireless-network password is "[name of housemate] is awesome", because I wanted it to make it awkward for my housemate to tell guests what the password is.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:40 AM
horizontal rule
56

re: 54

I don't think so. Or at least I never do. However, at a medical appointment the other day when the doctor said, 'Hello, I'm Dr Smith', I replied with 'Hi, I'm Dr nattarGcM'. She didn't look amused.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
57

54: I don't know that it's exactly rude, but it's at least weird. You introduce yourself as Firstname Lastname. (A related twitch is that I was taught never to use 'Esq.' as a suffix for my own name. Other lawyers are supposed to 'Esq.' me, and I them in return, but I don't give myself the honorific. I don't think this is consistently followed, though.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
58

44: Does
Mister Smearcase
Ever
View
Before Posting.

But in fact your mnemonic was totally different so judges I say no pwnage and actual value add. Everyone should eschew apologizing and caveating and whatnot and just do and say whatever the fuck they intend to do or say.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
59

I'm going to go ahead and commend Urple for being so good-natured about our pleasure in his foibles.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
60

If this is the British oddness thread ... I was in Oxford today, doing an open top bus tour with Kid D who has been desperate to do one for ages (and having lunch with C), and was amused when we went past the animal house and the guide told us that we were passing a medical research building that was built a couple of years ago. There were loads of buildings that he didn't mention, so why bother specifically referring to one that's so controversial that you don't want to actually say what it is?


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
61

56/57: except for at a college, hopefully? Because I call myself Dr. Geebie all the time.

There's even a thing whereby teachers ought not be more informal, because they're undermining their colleagues whose authority is more tenuous, due to our students being possibly racist or sexist or ageist little shits.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
62

I second 59.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:50 AM
horizontal rule
63

I'm Dr nattarGcM'. She didn't look amused.

Well, Google-proofing in conversation is a bit weird.



Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:56 AM
horizontal rule
64

re: 61

I very very rarely refer to myself as Dr nattarGcM. Mostly when someone is giving off arsey vibes about their own high-falutin' status.

There was a thing at work a few years back where there was a meeting to thrash out some disaster that had happened; apportioning blame and trying to prevent it happening again. I gave my view, which was totally right,* and then a guy from another department gave his view, which was a load of made-up fraudulent bullshit.** Afterwards I remarked to my boss that I couldn't believe that the senior person adjudicating the meeting hadn't taken my side. And he said:

"Well, he said to me that Lying-shitebag has an Oxbridge PhD, and took that as basically sufficient reason for dismissing the opposing case."

So, ever since, I make sure every work email has a prominent sig with 'Dr Fucking Know-all, Many Degrees" on it.

* no humour intended. It was a case that it was so utterly obvious who was right that I was embarrassed for the other people in the meeting.

** outright lies designed to get someone fired. I'm still somewhat ashamed I've never met him in a dark alley somewhere and broken him.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
65

Yeah, "Dr." seems to occupy a different space than "Mr./Ms." in this realm. Maybe because in the medical context, it is something people want to know off the bat.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 8:58 AM
horizontal rule
66

Right, Dr. is a status claim, while everyone's entitled to Mr. or Ms. So you can introduce yourself as Dr. where it's appropriate for you to be claiming that status (an MD talking to a patient, a teacher talking to a class). It feels like there's something slightly more complicated than that going on with not introducing yourself as Mr/Ms, but I'm not pinning it down successfully.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:11 AM
horizontal rule
67

That you're not introducing any information by calling yourself Mr/Ms? So it's solely pomp?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:13 AM
horizontal rule
68

67: It would have put a quick end to all those "Pat" sketches on SNL.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
69

Is it etiquettal (in formal contexts, of course) to introduce oneself as Mr./Ms. Surname?

If you're Sidney Poitier, sure.

If this is the British oddness thread ...

Implying there's another kind?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
70

Something like that, or you're preemptively guarding against the possibility that they'll rudely firstname you, and assuming other people will be rude is rude in itself.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
71

63: what do you mean, googleproofing? nattarGcM is a perfectly cromulent old Qwlghmian name.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
72

re: 71

Indeed, it means 'nattar of Gcm', where 'nattar' is an old Qwlghmian name for 'illegitimate son of'.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
73

All my friends are different, but I love them all the same.


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
74

Indeed, it means 'nattar of Gcm', where 'nattar' is an old Qwlghmian name for 'illegitimate son of'.

So Qwlghmian expresses of-ness through adjacency? Are you sure it's not supposed to be parsed as "natt ar Gcm"?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
75

re: 74

It's, ahem, broadly similar to the Irish/Scottish, McX, to mean 'son of X', and FitzX, to mean 'illegitimate son of X'.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:47 AM
horizontal rule
76

a brief period of reading far too many regency romance novels. But that's not to be spoken of.

I would speak of this, even in mixed company. I just recently went on a Georgette Heyer streak. I hadn't known of her before. Fun!

an MD talking to a patient

I think it is fair for medical doctors to call themselves such. (Although I like honorifics in general, and default to them or a nice Sir or Ma'am.) You aren't friends. You are relating to them solely for their profession, and this is the mark of their profession, which is important enough for you to buy their time. Dr. Lastname may well have her finger up your ass within half an hour, so let's keep this all real professional and formal.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
77

I am incapable of referring to myself as Dr. Tailshrub (and will be incapable of referring to myself as Prof. Tailshrub when it becomes an accurate term of address next year), even in cases where that information would be useful to my interlocutor. It just feels wrong wrong wrong, and so I have to resort to various other ways of conveying the information.


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
78

"Dr. Tailshrub" is a fantastic name.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:51 AM
horizontal rule
79

Even to students?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:51 AM
horizontal rule
80

Even to students who will otherwise call you Miss or Ma'am, but never your first name?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
81

53: In college a friend of mine took a week- or two-long course with him and reported that he was as kind and charming as he seemed on television but also a total hardass in the old school French kitchen way suggested in the linked article.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
82

Dr. Lastname may well have her finger up your ass within half an hour, so let's keep this all real professional and formal.

That would seem to be a reason to keep it friendly.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
83

Dr. Lastname may well have her finger up your ass within half an hour, so let's keep this all real professional and formal.

In that case, there are clearly social contexts where using "Dr" is appropriate too.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
84

It's, ahem, broadly similar to the Irish/Scottish, McX, to mean 'son of X', and FitzX, to mean 'illegitimate son of X'.

Oh, so really "nattarGcM" doesn't mean "nattar of GcM", because "nattar" doesn't by itself mean "illegitimate son" (the way "Fitz" doesn't, by itself, mean that). So I should have looked at your second rather than your first explanation: "nattar", meaning "illegitimate son of", by itself has the of-ness.

You see, my confusion derives entirely from YOUR confusing exposition.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:54 AM
horizontal rule
85

I think it is fair for medical doctors to call themselves such. (Although I like honorifics in general, and default to them or a nice Sir or Ma'am.) You aren't friends. You are relating to them solely for their profession, and this is the mark of their profession, which is important enough for you to buy their time. Dr. Lastname may well have her finger up your ass within half an hour, so let's keep this all real professional and formal.

This is cool, but I'd like an honorific as well -- if you're Dr. X, I'd like to be Ms. Breath, rather than Lizard. (In practice, I don't notice doctors firstnaming me -- they seem to avoid the issue, which I don't mind at all. But don't call me by my first name if I can't do the same to you.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:54 AM
horizontal rule
86

re: 84.last

Yes.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:55 AM
horizontal rule
87

Yep. I tell them what they can call me at the beginning of the course ("Please call me Dr. Tailshrub" or "You can call me either Redfox or Prof. Tailshrub, as you prefer," or whatever, depending on the circumstances), and then I generally sign emails with my initials. If for some reason I was calling one of them on the phone I would introduce myself by my full name ("This is Redfox Tailshrub, your Fraudulent Pseudoscience professor").


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:55 AM
horizontal rule
88

The parsing "Redfox Tailshrub" amuses me, because I inwardly pronounce "redfoxtailshrub" with antepenultimate stress, the other syllables being unstressed and additionally short (thus the second paeon), while the split-up version calls ineluctably for an inward pronunciation of two trochees.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
89

I'm no longer sure that's how I pronounce "redfoxtailshrub". But separating the elements persists in seeming odd.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
90

88: I pronounce it as you, with an accented fox.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:59 AM
horizontal rule
91

I really get a kick out of calling myself Dr. Geebie, to be honest, because it sounds like I'm putting on airs. I don't know why I enjoy it so much, but I do.

I'm pretty sure it's slightly local to Heebie U, and that at Big Research University I'd feel like a goon. This place is traditional enough that it's entertaining to play along.

(I would never introduce myself that way to anyone but an undergraduate student, however, because that would be pretentious.)


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 9:59 AM
horizontal rule
92

I'm always having to correct people (mostly in emails) that I'm only Mr. Hick, not Dr. Hick. It annoys me.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:00 AM
horizontal rule
93

with an accented fox.

Faux?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
94

I particular enjoy it when students drop the "Geebie" and address me as "Doc" or "Professor". I feel like I made some team from the 1950s.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
95

Team Twit! I made first string!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
96

Adults can introduce themselves to kids as Mr./Mrs./Ms. X (especially in a school setting).

College students should be told specifically what to use, otherwise the clueless ones will default to high school titles (Mr./Mrs./Ms.) and piss people off. I explicitly say "You can call me by my first name, or you can use Prof. LastName. Don't say Mr. it makes me feel like a high school teacher." Freshman need to learn this, and it's helpful for them to hear it explicitly before they make themselves sound like sexist assholes with a woman professor.

Dr. is fine, but really only europeans should be calling me Dr., the correct term of address in the US is prof.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:06 AM
horizontal rule
97

Convention at Chicago used to be to address (male) professors with "Mr.", supposedly because since everyone teaching you would have a PhD there was no point in introducing discriminations of rank into forms of address. Or something. I'm not sure what custom was with female professors; surely there must have been some even in days of yore there? When I was an undergrad this was a source of much confusion. I'm sure some people defaulted to "Mrs." or "Ms.", but I think most just used "professor so-and-so".


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
98

Dr. is fine, but really only europeans should be calling me Dr., the correct term of address in the US is prof.

That's definitely not the convention here: non-tenure track faculty members don't have terminal degrees, so "professor" correlates with lesser status.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
99

22-23: Wasn't Sifton mostly bragging about how much good food he got to eat? Also, maybe I'm a sap, but I liked the end of the piece.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
100

I always mentally pronounce "redfoxtailshrub" as two trochees, but I suppose that's for no good reason.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
101

I would speak of this, even in mixed company. I just recently went on a Georgette Heyer streak. I hadn't known of her before. Fun!

Isn't she? I found out about her about two years ago and am now quite sad to have run through all her novels (except the historical ones, because Wellington, whatever), several of them multiple times.

I know AWB and LB are fans, too.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
102

I tell all my students to call me Cecily, and that I'm not a doctor yet, and that I haven't finished my phd, so really Cecily is fine because I'm not a doctor. Yet. So mostly they start emails with "Dr. Cecily"

I mentally pronounce rfts as two trochees too, unless I just truncate it to redfox.


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:18 AM
horizontal rule
103

REDfxTAILshrb?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:20 AM
horizontal rule
104

I sometimes get mail addressed to Mr. Kraab because my first name is androgynous. The best, though, is when I get an e-mail from another union person addressed to Brother Kraab.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:22 AM
horizontal rule
105

103: Yes. Though unstressed doesn't mean vowels aren't pronounced, IIMBSALB.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:27 AM
horizontal rule
106

105: those were a vocalic x and a vocalic r.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
107

Which I guess would mean that "shrb" was pronounced "sherb", though.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
108

104: I don't understand how "Sir" is androgynous at all.


Posted by: Benquo | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 11:49 AM
horizontal rule
109

Yeah, grad students should just be called by first names.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
110

Ha! As if anybody ever calls grad students.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:11 PM
horizontal rule
111

Until I encountered academics, I thought lawyers could be annoyingly status-conscious and prone to pointless bickering.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:14 PM
horizontal rule
112

In my experience young american academics aren't that status-conscious: it's rare to find someone who objects to students using first names. The problem is that students don't want to use first names. If they're going to try to use formal titles they should do so correctly, and most importantly they should learn it before they start calling their female professors "Mrs. X."


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
113

Dr. is fine, but really only europeans should be calling me Dr., the correct term of address in the US is prof.

At my graduate institution there is quite the distinction made between Dr. and Professor. There are people hired to teach on a pretty much permanent basis (so not adjuncts) who are preceptors instead of professors, and are always identified as Dr. Soandso.


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:20 PM
horizontal rule
114

108: And I suppose you don't think women should get to be knights either, you sexist.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
115

I think all men and women should own a pair of British Knights


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
116

Oh man, I was recently reading a letter signed by a bunch of famous British mathematicians protesting some government decision (basically the conservatives decided to get rid of all math postdocs except for the ones in statistics), and sorting out the awesome strings of letters was hilarious.

The best was "Robert, Lord May of Oxford, OM, AC, Kt, FRS." Most of those appeared elsewhere (FRS is fellow of the royal society which is almost all the famous mathematicians, OM is a super-high honor that's limited to 25 people, etc.), but the most confusing one is "Kt." What's going on there is that since "Lord" is a more important title than "Sir" you don't put "Sir" in front, and instead you at "Kt." I'm not totally sure why you can't say "Sir Robert, Lord May of Oxford" but apparently you don't.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:36 PM
horizontal rule
117

I think the idea is that you don't give someone a less important honorific if they rate a better one, and there's only one honorific slot in a mode of address. So if someone has a right to be called Lord May, calling them Sir Robert doesn't fly.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:38 PM
horizontal rule
118

113 strikes my as too nit-picky. If you have a doctorate and you work teaching at a university then I think you should be allowed to use professor. Nit-picking about who's really a "professor" is something I identify with Europe where professor is the equivalent of holding a named chair, and people who would be an assistant or associate prof here are lecturers of some sort.

Though I guess "research scientists" are something of an exception. But they don't interact with students, so first names should be fine mostly.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
119

117: That makes sense, except that Sir is attached to first names, while Lord is attached to the last name, so it seems like the slots don't conflict there. Not that one should expect these things to make sense.

The list of OM's is great (David Attenborough! Guy who invented the web!). I kinda wish we had equivalent things here, as it would be amusing to try to sort out who the 20 awesomest americans are.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
120

112: Young anythings tend to be less status-conscious than old, but I'd still put academics toward the status-conscious end of the scale. My half-baked theory is that a working environment without a lot of formal hierarchy makes it that much more important to police the informal hierarchy.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
121

Lord is attached to the last name

Not always; Lord [firstname] is an honorific for the younger son of a peer (and maybe there's another category? but at least that). I think if the younger son of a peer were knighted, the Sir would bounce the Lord in that instance, but I'm not sure. And I have no idea at all about Hon. -- it's like the Lord [firstname] thing, but less, and I don't know the boundaries.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
122

Further confusing, at my undergraduate institution, it is said that Mr. Jefferson (as he's called) insisted that all non-MD doctors be called "professor" rather than "doctor" (a tradition that holds to this day). The cynical version of the story continues: you see, ol' Tom felt insecure about never having earned a Ph.D.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
123

I also think that as research activity has gotten more intense over the past 30 years, people should be more status-conscious about how good their research is, and care less about their official title. Certainly academics are more status motivated than most comparable professions, because a lot of what would ordinarily be financial incentive is replaced by status incentives.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:47 PM
horizontal rule
124

123: Agreed.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
125

Strangely, I had a discussion of just this subject over lunch with a soon-to-be PhD. (Who appears here under false pretenses: she did nothing especially, or even slightly, messily.)

My 1936 Britannica has a long, long list of contributors full of various initials.


Posted by: CharleyCarpEsq | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
126

Kraab is a knight, though, right? (Although the obvious realm of her knighthood has dropped outof existence.)


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
127

Did she drink multiple espressos? A mess, as one might say, of Illy?


Posted by: snarkout | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:57 PM
horizontal rule
128

My lab is all first names, even with undergrads, but the wall of pictures of lab members is organized according to an amusingly strict vertical hierarchy. My change in status from hired technician to graduate student occasioned quite a significant change in the height of my picture.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
129

I will bet $20 that LB learned the information in 21 as a result of reading Dorothy Sayers.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
130

121


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
131

119 -- that list of OMs seems totes bizarre. Owen Chadwick? And then a few famous scientists but not many. And then Thatcher.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
132

I see that the Knights of Pythias has includes William Jennings Bryan, FDR, and Anthony Weiner, among other luminaries.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:08 PM
horizontal rule
133

Local take on occupation. I suppose someone has long since tried to refund the $24 for Wall Street.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:21 PM
horizontal rule
134

123: I was privy to a thick wad of correspondence between two profs and the department chairman about the assignment of ID numbers in the then new personnel computer system. The numbers had been generated at random but these two clowns insisted their numbers HAD to be lower than those for lower ranking types.

Eventually, after exhausting logic and diplomacy, the chair just told them to shut up, pretty much in those words. (Googling their names, I see a few hits on lawsuits about this, that, and the other thing. Not surprising, I guess)


Posted by: Biohazard | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:23 PM
horizontal rule
135

129: Yes -- you can tell that I learned it from a novel rather than professionally because I remember it accurately.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:38 PM
horizontal rule
136

Oh good. That's how I learned that piece of trivia, and I like to think that we are all the same, deep down.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:50 PM
horizontal rule
137

We're all the same, deep down, except with slightly different intestinal fauna.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
138

135/36: That's how I learned it too. It's nice because Lord Peter explains it so clearly. (And it's not so different from the Jane is Miss Bennett but Elizabeth is Miss Elizabeth thing.)


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
139

And it will literally never be of any use to any of us, other than understanding the relationships in older British novels. Does anyone understand exactly who gets to call themselves Hon. (barring Pittsburgh restaurant patrons)?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
140

139: I feel like I should know this, having read Hons and Rebels, but I don't.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
141

I think a peer's eldest son may, as a courtesy, go by one of his father's lesser titles: e.g., the Earl of Brideshead, dreary eldest child of Lord Marchmain in Wait, Were They Gay or Not? Brideshead Revisited.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
142

And I suppose you don't think women should get to be knights either, you sexist.

If I could find my copy of Uden's A Dictionary of Chivalry (a terrific time-waster and perfect gift for shy, bookish children) I would quote the passages about the various orders of chivalry for ladies.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:31 PM
horizontal rule
143

That's how I learned it too.

And the same, of course, goes for me.


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:32 PM
horizontal rule
144

Would the natural split of redfoxtailshrub for Neb and LB then be be The Hon. Red Foxtailshrub?


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:35 PM
horizontal rule
145

141: Is that a courtesy, or is the title actually moving around? I think some lesser titles may automatically descend to a heir, but it's specific to the particular title how it behaves. I'm thinking the Duke of Omnium's son was the Viscount? Earl? of Silverbridge for real (although Planty Pall wasn't, possibly because he was a nephew rather than a son -- that the title wouldn't jump to the next heir, it'd only go to any actual eldest son of the current duke.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:36 PM
horizontal rule
146

And wikipedia says I'm wrong, it is a courtesy. Did not know that.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:38 PM
horizontal rule
147

145: I've never read of it as anything but a courtesy, but I assume that some titles might be inherited by the eldest son separately for some reason or other (maybe, say, a title in a matrilineal jurisdiction (Hungary?), if the mother happened to have been an only child).


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:41 PM
horizontal rule
148

144 sounds good to me.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
149

The Order of Merit and the Companionship of Honour are odd - they're SO RARE that there is a numerical limit, and they are the only honours in the literally personal gift of the old lady from Windsor, rather than being delegated to the prime minister. But they're both relatively recent and were invented to provide something for geeks, industrialists, etc (in the first case) and to help the monarchy look like it recognised the people who were fighting the First World War for it (in the second).

So if you're the kind of person who really wants British honours, you should arguably disdain the two hardest-to-get that are actually handed out by the monarch. And if you're that kind of person, you're meant to care about the monarch's approval. But then you get into the point that in a sense the royal family aren't actually as posh as some of the aristocracy and indeed just the squirearchy, because they've been trying to look less weird since 1917 under the orders of successive governments. Compare Prince William and David Cameron, frex. One of them is a vaguely posh, rugby union playing junior RAF officer and the other seems to be an arrogant prussian junker lizard permanently on the edge of horsewhipping a servant.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
150

The Hon. Red Foxtailshrub

It's pronounced "Fanshaw."


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
151

149 -- It looks like the only people in the world that are both in the Order of Merit and the Companionship of Honour are (a) Frederick Sanger [OK, legit] and . . . (b) David Attenborough. Are you fucking kidding me? How far does narrating documentaries about the black-tailed swimmingduck get you? I guess the royals like their nature documentaries.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
152

God, the Tories stuffed the CHs with dullards didn't they?

There is of course the great Shadow-Order of Omelas. The list looks way more fun than any of the others, although there are a few dullards near the top.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
153

I think it means the BBC is probably safer than I feared. I note that she put one architect into each, presumably to avoid having to talk to both of them.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
154

I guess the royals like their nature documentaries.

It's actually a very well-hidden scandal: the honors are a payoff, so that he doesn't reveal that the Queen makes come over and narrate whatever her corgis are doing. Unchecked power is a terrible thing.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
155

When I am queen, the least terrible thing I will do is make famous people come over and perform at my whim.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:34 PM
horizontal rule
156

Only the children of earls and above get to be lords and ladies - like Lady Di, daughter of Earl Spencer. Children of other peers are hons - like the Mitfords, children of the second baron Redesdale.


Posted by: Basil Valentine | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:55 PM
horizontal rule
157

I'm sure that would be an improvement. See here for an exhaustive catalogue of tedious kitsch.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:57 PM
horizontal rule
158

157 to 155, of course.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 3:58 PM
horizontal rule
159

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/1303

Romney hitting Perry.

Walked by the Occupy folks this afternoon. Average age looked about mine. It's probably a younger group in the evenings.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 4:09 PM
horizontal rule
160

an arrogant prussian junker lizard permanently on the edge of horsewhipping a servant

I just wanted to see these words again.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-19-11 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
161

David Attenborough. Are you fucking kidding me? How far does narrating documentaries about the black-tailed swimmingduck get you?

In his defence, he was also director of programming for the BBC, and was formerly an official National Treasure until he was promoted to make room for Stephen Fry; he is now a Living God.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-20-11 1:38 AM
horizontal rule
162

Stephen Fry, now there's a man we could do with less of on our telly. Viz his recent/ongoing program about language which, to me at least, seemed to contain a lot of insufficiently substantiated speculation presented as fact.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-20-11 1:44 AM
horizontal rule
163

The Order of Merit and the Companionship of Honour are odd - ... they're both relatively recent and were invented to provide something for geeks, industrialists, etc (in the first case) and to help the monarchy look like it recognised the people who were fighting the First World War for it (in the second).

So if you're the kind of person who really wants British honours, you should arguably disdain the two hardest-to-get that are actually handed out by the monarch

Sounds a version of the thing in Proust where Saint-Loup looks down on the Prince de Borodino because the latter's great-grandfather was raised to the nobility by Napoleon, making him riffraff from the viewpoint of the noble families of the Ancien Régime.

But then you get into the point that in a sense the royal family aren't actually as posh as some of the aristocracy and indeed just the squirearchy, because they've been trying to look less weird since 1917 under the orders of successive governments. Compare Prince William and David Cameron, frex. One of them is a vaguely posh, rugby union playing junior RAF officer and the other seems to be an arrogant prussian junker lizard permanently on the edge of horsewhipping a servant.

What you're talking about is probably a different phenomenon, but isn't there a stereotype from way back that the Royal Family is supposed to be earthy, horsey and unintellectual? The idea being that when you're that high up you can dispense with the airs and just embody the essence of the nation.


Posted by: One of Many | Link to this comment | 10-20-11 7:40 AM
horizontal rule
164

isn't there a stereotype from way back that the Royal Family is supposed to be earthy, horsey and unintellectual?

Not that far back, but the whole "Farmer George" thing is probably what you're thinking about. George III was a Good King (although not a Good Thing) because he was fairly economical (by 18th century king standards), interested in pigs and turnips, loved his wife, didn't shag around, had lots of kids, was Protestant etc. Not like those suspiciously luxurious Stuarts and Bourbons and Bonapartes, you see.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-21-11 3:04 AM
horizontal rule
165

"D'you know what they call me? Farmer George, that's what they call me! D'you know what that is, sir?"
"Insolence, father?"
"No, sir! It is love!"


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-21-11 3:06 AM
horizontal rule
166

It's probably a slightly obvious choice, but my favourite quote from that film is still:

My dear Pepys, the persistent excellence of the stool has been one of this disease's most tedious features. When will you get it into your head, one can produce a copious, regular, and exquisitely-turned evacuation every day and still be a stranger to reason?


Posted by: One of Many | Link to this comment | 10-21-11 6:24 AM
horizontal rule
167

But if your bowels are irregular, you can't be sane?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-21-11 6:35 AM
horizontal rule
168

But if your bowels are irregular, you can't be sane?

That was apparently the theory:

In the humoural doctrine, madness was the result of an imbalance between the four humours, and treatment necessitated the restoration of that balance... [D]octors ... administered ... laxatives to purge the bowels, in efforts to restore the humoural balance.

---"Madness" by Mary de Young


Posted by: One of Many | Link to this comment | 10-21-11 7:05 AM
horizontal rule
169

If I don't get coffee, I don't purge my bowels. Therefore, I am correct in assuming coffee keeps me sane.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-21-11 7:09 AM
horizontal rule
170

169: This is the way that new horizons of thought are opened up. A piece of the puzzle falls into place, and suddenly all is light.


Posted by: One of Many | Link to this comment | 10-21-11 7:24 AM
horizontal rule