Re: We're all going to die

1

Hey!


Posted by: Nathan Williams | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
2

God people are stupid. Say, among friends and family, how many furniture fires have you even heard of in all your life? I can't think of even one and this is from someone who as a kid intentionally set a shit ton of things on fire.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
3

Say, among friends and family, how many furniture fires have you even heard of in all your life?

If we're going to go this way with the topic, we should try to do so in a manner supportive of those who have had, through no fault of their own, some bad luck.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
4

People are stupid, this is stupid, the chemicals shouldn't be used.

But I really have to think that if something's been sprayed on all the furniture in the US for a couple of decades, and we're still arguing about what harm it does rather than about the otherwise inexplicable epidemic of children turning into hermaphroditic frogs, that the effects probably aren't too much to worry about.

Say, among friends and family, how many furniture fires have you even heard of in all your life?

Didn't someone set McMegan's ottoman on fire during a party? I seem to remember Becks mentioning it.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
5

I am concerned that one of the story's subheds is "Toxic Roulette," a seemingly intentional nod to the hysteria-inducing yet beyond-flawed-all-the-way-to-made-up newspiece from the early 80s "Vaccine Roulette."


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:14 PM
horizontal rule
6

If I had a nickel for every time I accidentally started a fire, I'd have at least fifteen cents. I guess none of them involved furniture or were indoors.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:14 PM
horizontal rule
7

I have been wondering about flame-retardants in the context of baby crib mattresses lately. It seems to me that, as babies don't smoke cigarettes, the mattress is only at risk of catching fire if everything else around it is already on fire. At that point, how much if anything is gained by the mattress being a little slower to start burning?


Posted by: Nathan Williams | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:15 PM
horizontal rule
8

babies don't smoke cigarettes

Maybe some people's children aren't as cool as mine.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
9

"Then we sit on our couch that can contain a pound of chemicals that's from the same family as banned pesticides like DDT."

DDT is pretty fucking safe. At the time of the ban it was being sprayed in obscene quantities as insects developed resistance. People failed to keel over dead. This fact has been part of the armamentarium of the anti-science bullshitters who set out to discredit all environmentalism by smearing Rachel Carson.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
10

7: When does Baby Williams make the scene, Nathan?


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
11

7: According to the article, there's an expert witness in the pocket of Big Flame Retardant who goes around telling a made-up story about a baby who died when a dog knocked a lit candle into her crib. In the story, the mattress was flame-retardant, but the pillow wasn't, and it killed her. But the pictures he shows are of a baby who died in an extension cord fire, and there's no record of the flame-retardant status of any of the stuff around her.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
12

9: I think it has been pretty well established that DDT isn't safe for birds. Anyway, nobody is going to support a movement to rename her bridge.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
13

Due the end of July.


Posted by: Nathan Williams | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:22 PM
horizontal rule
14

Sleep all of June and best wishes.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
15

12: Flame-retardant couches killed the dinosaurs. Fact.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
16

Is it wrong that the thing I found most frustrating about that article is that they didn't mention any of the specific chemicals? I want to go look up the structures, damn it.
At summer camp we used to write on the floor in bug spray and set it on fire, or spray tennis balls with bug spray and set them on fire and play ball hockey. The flaming ball would often roll under a bed and no mattresses ever burst into flames. As anyone who has tried to cook on a camping trip can tell you, it's often very hard to set things on fire (drought plagued regions excepted.)


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:38 PM
horizontal rule
17

But certain dinosaurs developed a resistance...

and now we call them "birds." And now you know the rest of the story.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:39 PM
horizontal rule
18

They migrated to other planets?


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
19

12.last: nobody is going to support a movement to rename her bridge.

I would. Fuck that shit, it's the 9th Street Bridge. In fact, I literally just walked across the 7th Street Bridge minutes ago and had to look up whether it was the Carson or not (it's the Warhol). 6th, 7th and 9th*, a set of three beautiful matching bridges stupidly renamed in honor of zombies.

*The shot had the angle I liked, but gets the names of all the surrounding bridges wrong (it's the Allegheny, not the Mon).


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
20

I take the general opinion that infrastructure shouldn't be named after people. I'm looking at you, Helen Bentley Port of Baltimore.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:54 PM
horizontal rule
21

19: Everybody calls them by the street name regardless.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
22

I take the general opinion that infrastructure shouldn't be named after people.

Because that's valuable advertising you can sell to Chik-fi-la?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 3:07 PM
horizontal rule
23

Chik-fi-la

Nice try, McDowell's. Consider yourself sued.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 3:08 PM
horizontal rule
24

I think you mean pseud.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 3:12 PM
horizontal rule
25

FLAME-RETARDANT COUCHES: THE SILENT KILLER


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 3:17 PM
horizontal rule
26

"It's better to burn up than to die from dust"


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
27

Because that's valuable advertising you can sell to Chik-fi-la?

Because most things already have perfectly good names, given to them by the people who built them, and/or denoting the relative geography thereof. Coming by, decades or centuries later, and slapping someone's name on it, just because you think that person is swell, is just super tacky to me.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 4:22 PM
horizontal rule
28

At that point, how much if anything is gained by the mattress being a little slower to start burning?

If it's your mattress and furniture that's on fire, apparently not much. If you manufacture the compound that's added to the mattress, apparently a lot.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 5:00 PM
horizontal rule
29

So what you mean is infrastructure shouldn't be RE-named after people.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 5:04 PM
horizontal rule
30

20: Naming things after living people is especially risky. I think Pete Rose Way has officially been renamed, though the Ronald Reagan Cross-County Highway was intentional.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 5:18 PM
horizontal rule
31

As comment 1 indirectly indicates, this article is part of a longer series. There's a lot of interesting stuff there, including more about the suspected health risks.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 6:03 PM
horizontal rule
32

I wonder if you need a fireproof mattress if you have a hyperbaric chamber.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:24 PM
horizontal rule
33

Via the League of Ordinary Gentlemen I see that the House Budget kills the American Community Survey. Conducted since the time of Jefferson, it apparently doesn't pass muster to them constitutionally. Never mind that the legislature at the time basically contained the folks who wrote the damn constitution. Oh and if ever there were a time that the general welfare clause made sense (even absent the census portion on ArtI!).


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:36 PM
horizontal rule
34

The American Community Survey was conducted since, like, 2000.


Posted by: Bave | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:37 PM
horizontal rule
35

Joke's on you; I don't even own a baby.


Posted by: Merganser | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:41 PM
horizontal rule
36

Yeah, they only started doing it whenever they stopped doing the Long Form Census. Which is not to say that it isn't still a valuable program.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:42 PM
horizontal rule
37

The long form has been around basically the whole time. Different q's though.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:44 PM
horizontal rule
38

Also I misunderstood at least a few aspects... So... Never mind. Still isn't good though.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:48 PM
horizontal rule
39

Apparently, it's a crime to knowingly put a falsehood on the ACS. Unlike your taxes, you can't just write down whatever numbers seem right.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:48 PM
horizontal rule
40

37: I don't think that's actually true either. This seems to say the long form started in 1940, although I think it incorporated some questions that had previously been part of the regular census.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 7:50 PM
horizontal rule
41

It does seem that even the 1790 census collected information not strictly necessary under the Constitution for redistricting, like age, sex, and race - it gives free white males 16 and up, free white males under 16, free white females, all other free persons, and slaves. Then the 1800 census (this one administered by James Madison) divided free whites into 5 age groups, and it just got more complicated from there until they spun off the long form in 1940 to reduce the burden.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
42

Say, among friends and family, how many furniture fires have you even heard of in all your life?

My mom set a couch on fire once. Lit a candle with a match, shook the match, the match-head sailed off onto the couch, and then it burst into flames in really dramatic fashion. I kind of shouted something incoherent and froze and she had the presence of mind to grab a blanket and beat the flames out. I really hadn't thought that furniture could be so incredibly flammable.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 8:23 PM
horizontal rule
43

Nice try, ese, but we can tell you're just shilling for the chemical industry.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 8:57 PM
horizontal rule
44

I have a friend whose guitar has these cool looking burn patterns all over it. What happened was, this guy crashed at his house after hanging out, falling asleep while smoking on the couch. And the guitar was leaning up against the couch, so.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 9:07 PM
horizontal rule
45

My upstairs neighbors in law school lit a couch/apartment on fire with a cigarette.


Posted by: Lemmy Caution | Link to this comment | 05-10-12 9:27 PM
horizontal rule
46

it apparently doesn't pass muster to them constitutionally. Never mind that the legislature at the time basically contained the folks who wrote the damn constitution.

Weren't some of the folks who wrote the constitution also OK with the Alien and Sedition Acts?

42: cheaper modern furniture can be tremendously flammable. It contains a lot of synthetic materials and foam - solid hydrocarbons.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 2:20 AM
horizontal rule
47

Surely the point is that furniture catching fire was a problem when literally everybody smoked all the time. The fire code is all about matches and cigarettes for a reason. Why would you be futzing with matches on a sofa, if not to light up?

Of course, smokers have a reasonable expectation of their house not going up if they drop a ciggy too...


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 2:31 AM
horizontal rule
48

Given all that, surely it's a good thing that our babies, at least, are loaded with flame-retardants. The house may burn to the foundations, but the babies, Terminator-like, will walk out of the inferno unharmed.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 3:12 AM
horizontal rule
49

Weren't some of the folks who wrote the constitution also OK with the Alien and Sedition Acts?
Sure, but 46.1 still has a point in that one current faction fetishizes "the founders" and would also likely be quite cool with new Alien and Sedition Acts.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 5:17 AM
horizontal rule
50

Nice try, ajay, but we all know babies can't walk.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 5:18 AM
horizontal rule
51

50: of course they can walk, they just can't be bothered most of the time. If they're in a burning house, you bet they'll ditch that "oh I can only crawl, please carry me everywhere" nonsense. They'll be sprinting out of there like little pudgy Usain Bolts.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 5:20 AM
horizontal rule
52

Smoking roommate fell asleep on couch with a cigarette. Made a big hole in the couch, but apparently the couch was sufficiently flame retardant to keep it from going up entirely.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 5:54 AM
horizontal rule
53

I think of furniture fires as very much a phenomenon of poverty. Much like kerosene-heater fires.

I don't know how accurate this perception is.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 6:43 AM
horizontal rule
54

Friend of mine had a guest staying who fell asleep while smoking in bed. House burned down with guest in it. My friend was out at the time and came home to the aftermath. Her response was that from then on nobody smoked in her (next) house and if they did they weren't asked back.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 6:48 AM
horizontal rule
55

53

I think of furniture fires as very much a phenomenon of poverty ...

Cheap furniture is more flammable?


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 6:50 AM
horizontal rule
56

55: Generally, I'd expect so. Actual pieces of wood don't catch fire very easily and you really don't see that type of material in cheap furniture. Also, the tighter the weave of the fabric, the harder it is to catch a flame. I don't know about the stuffing on padded furniture.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 6:52 AM
horizontal rule
57

I wasn't thinking of cheap furniture, more of the fact that poverty tends to correlate with overcrowding, unsafe practices (heating with an oven, heating with kerosene heaters), very young kids being left home alone or with slightly older kids babysitting, utility bill issues (can't pay electric bill, therefore using candles, therefore more fires), more smoking, etc.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 6:59 AM
horizontal rule
58

Actual pieces of wood don't catch fire very easily
Shit, I knew I would die because I shop at Ikea.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 7:02 AM
horizontal rule
59

I remember during a long power outage in Durham there was a great deal of trouble with CO poisoning and that mostly it was people born in Mexico who had the trouble. Mexican house construction isn't as air tight and you can burn a small charcoal fire in the house without getting to toxic levels.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 05-11-12 7:02 AM
horizontal rule