Re: Not Strongly Policy-Related Ignorant Question About Guns

1

As far as I know, the mechanical movements going on in a semi-automatic during the process of chambering a round can affect the accuracy of the shot. This may no longer be an issue with modern weapons but I'm pretty sure it used to be.

All of this coming from the standpoint of someone whose interest in guns is purely as machines, not a gun owner and certainly not a specialist.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
2

Maybe semi-automatics are more prone to jam?

Granted, I don't have any particular reason for this suggestion beyond "more moving parts = more chances for stuff to go wrong".


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 7:46 AM
horizontal rule
3

For handguns, revolvers are the only thing made that isn't semi-automatic and those are indeed mostly made for reasons of historical interest. Revolvers are considered more reliable by some, but I think that is maybe a disappearing prejudice.

Also, revolvers are for people who like to shoot really big fucking bullets.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 7:50 AM
horizontal rule
4

From the wikipedia Sniper Rifle entry:

For a given cartridge, a bolt-action rifle is cheaper to build and maintain, more reliable, and lighter, due to fewer moving parts in the mechanism.

and

A bolt action is most commonly used in both military and police roles due to its higher accuracy and ease of maintenance.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 7:54 AM
horizontal rule
5

For shotguns, semi-auto wasn't common last time I was around gun people, but I think that may have changed. Still, the kick throws off your aim after one shot and, for hunting, your gun can't hold more than three shells anyway. Some of the double-barreled gun have different chokes on the barrels such that the first barrel to first is better suited for close shots and the second for shooting at something further away. The idea is that birds tend to move away after you shoot at them.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 7:57 AM
horizontal rule
6

But do you know the difference between gas-operated and delayed blowback? No? Then you clearly have no business discussing the topic of gun control. /shifting goalposts will shift


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
7

Obviously, if the birds decided to gang-up and rush the hunter, you'd need more than two shells.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
8

What I don't quite understand is why not-even-semiautomatic guns exist anymore, mostly.

Roughly the same reasons that not-even-fully-automatic transmissions still exist on automobiles. Cost, complexity, reliability, personal preferences.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:04 AM
horizontal rule
9

I always liked that part of the When Animals Attack! teaser when the deer starts kicking the shit out of the hunter.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:08 AM
horizontal rule
10

Which ones are going to be artisanally produced once we ban the other kinds?


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:12 AM
horizontal rule
11

Single-shot weapons are also usually safer for the user. A non-trivial number of people die each year from "I-was-sure-the gun-wasn't-loaded." If you remove the magazine from a semi-auto after chambering a round, that round is still in the chamber and able to be fired. With single-shot, you can see that there is no round in the chamber more easily.

(Aside: You'd think that there wouldn't be any constitutional problem in requiring guns to have a safety feature such that they would not fire without a magazine.)


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:13 AM
horizontal rule
12

Roughly the same reasons that not-even-fully-automatic transmissions still exist on automobiles. Cost, complexity, reliability, personal preferences.

I neither drive nor shoot, but aren't manual transmissions supposed to be more efficient than automatics?



Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:14 AM
horizontal rule
13

I was lumping that under cost.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:14 AM
horizontal rule
14

||

No more masturbating to Robert Bork.

|>


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
15

12 Also fun!

I've said it elsewhere and I'll say it here: A breech loading .577/450 Martini-Henry is all the rifle anyone needs. And you can even have a bayonet too.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:17 AM
horizontal rule
16

I neither drive nor shoot

So I take it you were never even issued a Man Card to be revoked?


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:18 AM
horizontal rule
17

15: If it was good enough for Young Michael Caine, it's good enough for you.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:21 AM
horizontal rule
18

17 He carried that rifle in at least two separate campaigns movies.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:25 AM
horizontal rule
19

14: See, liberals fucked up back in the day. Obama would have another justice to appoint.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:26 AM
horizontal rule
20

17: Come on, Moby, put it away. You know you're not going to use it.


Posted by: snarkout | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:27 AM
horizontal rule
21

Not till date night?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
22

Bunch of small moving parts often means less strength and rigidity in the platform. The semi autos have seen a lot of improvement in the last few years but bolt actions are still the champions when it comes to long range precision and you're usually spending quite a bit to get a semi auto capable of the kind of long range accuracy of even bog standard bolt action rifle. And with autos the tight fit to achieve that kind of accuracy does come at a reliability cost. Less play in the fit means just a little bit of dirt or whatever can jam things up easier.

With handguns the single actions (by those I mean the revolvers you associate with the old west) persist because of historical and personal interest but also because of strength and accuracy along with power. They're kind of the bolt actions of handguns for guys who handload and want to shoot at distance with handguns and/or hunt with a handgun. The original .45 Colts a hundred years ago were all running loads under 20K PSI but the heavier built modern Rugers will run 30 or 32K PSI loads no problem. Have it fit with a custom cylinder or shell out the bucks for a Freedom Arms and you can run a .45 Colt at 40 or 50K PSI. Likewise the Rossi lever action I have is fun as a machine and as it turns out that Winchester 1892 action design with modern steels will also handle 50K PSI loads. For comparison the Glock 9mm I carry for duty is using .356 inch diameter bullets 124 grains in weight at about 1000 feet per second. The .45 Colts are well, .45 in diameter and while you can shoot plinker or light target rounds, good handloads or high end factory loads can run a bullet of 300-335 grains at 1100-1300 feet per second. You can (and people do) hunt elk with that kind of thing.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:30 AM
horizontal rule
23

7: Obviously, if the birds decided to gang-up and rush the hunter, you'd need more than two shells.

It's like they're not even familiar with Alfred Hitchcock's body of work.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:33 AM
horizontal rule
24

For shotguns, semi-auto wasn't common last time I was around gun people, but I think that may have changed.

A bit, but the pumps are still popular. A lot cheaper and less finicky about what they'll cycle.

a safety feature such that they would not fire without a magazine

Already fairly common in handguns.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:35 AM
horizontal rule
25

24.last: I want it required by law on all new guns with magazines.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
26

I'm not familiar with this "Man Card". Is it some sort of consolation prize for an inability to get laid?


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:39 AM
horizontal rule
27

They use bolt-action rifles for target shooting in the biathlon. There's an application where you only shoot one bullet at a time, weight is important, and you are shooting in an environment (snow and ice) where jamming can be an issue.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:39 AM
horizontal rule
28

I want it required by law on all new guns with magazines.

Why do you hate natural selection?


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
29

They use skis instead of a snowmobile. That whole sport is strange.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
30

What has natural selection done for us lately?


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:44 AM
horizontal rule
31

Not much, probably because Moby and his ilk keep trying to thwart it.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
32

28: Up the road a bit a toddler died a couple of weeks ago when his dad put the gun the in car.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
33

My new law involves outlawing the sale of new semi-automatics altogether. Really, the second amendment should only cover everyone's right to own a musket.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
34

I think my sister has a Ruger of some kind, for predictably stupid reasons. She's wrong about needing it for self-defense, but if she were right, she wouldn't need anything more than that.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
35

Up the road a bit a toddler died a couple of weeks ago when his dad put the gun the in car.

Jesus christ. Did he have it loose or something? Anyone with sense is a fanatic about having a holster covering the trigger guard and even then you still don't have that thing pointed at people.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
36

It was loose. He'd been trying to sell it, not carry it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:49 AM
horizontal rule
37

Really, the second amendment should only cover everyone's right to own a musket.

And a horse, goddamit! This fucking city has regulations on horse ownership (minimum acreage requirements, etc.). How the hell am I supposed to defend myself against tyranny without a horse to ride? The second amendment says "arms", not "guns". I think the founding fathers would have understood that to include a military steed.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:51 AM
horizontal rule
38

I think my sister has a Ruger of some kind

Heh, "a Ruger" could mean anything from a cowboy style to an AR. They're not a niche maker.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:51 AM
horizontal rule
39

So he was carrying it around loaded?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:51 AM
horizontal rule
40

He'd been trying to sell it, not carry it.

Gah. Keep the actions open everyone. Remove all doubt.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
41

Apparently, the boy was older than I recall. See here. Obviously, the dad should have been much more careful, but not mandating a cheap fix that could protect against a lapse of judgement like that wouldn't happen for something other than guns.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:54 AM
horizontal rule
42

togolosh is right - it's accuracy and cost, mainly. And, it should be pointed out, legal requirements in some countries. You can own a bolt-action rifle or a break-action shotgun legally in the UK, but you pretty much can't own a semi-automatic rifle or shotgun. Not since 1986.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
43

38: I know it's a handgun and she has her concealed carry permit. Probably something along the lines of what you said once that your wife has?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:00 AM
horizontal rule
44

who handload and want to . . . hunt with a handgun

Why? Is it supposed to be more interesting in some way?


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:01 AM
horizontal rule
45

It's more of a challenge because you've got to get closer and it is harder to hit.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
46

42- And look at what it's done to their society- they're still ruled by monarchs!


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
47

If it was good enough for Young Michael Caine, it's good enough for you.

As my gun nut/army type friends point out regularly, most of the soldiers in "Zulu" are carrying Lee-Enfields, rather than the correct Martini-Henrys.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
48

46: single aimed shots were good enough for the Duke of Wellington, and they should be good enough for you.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
49

47: There's got to be a lot more Lee-Enfields laying around.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
50

Probably something along the lines of what you said once that your wife has?

Ah. My wife doesn't carry and she has a 4'' .357 that fairly large and heavy. I'd guess your sister is carrying one of the smaller models.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
51

I served on the jury for a case where one of the charges hinged on whether the defendant had helped someone else hide a gun. It was evident that none of us on the jury knew one single thing about guns we hadn't learned on "Law & Order" or "Bonanza." (Adjust the latter to your generation as appropriate. Everyone will already always have been watching "Law & Order.")


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
52

Why? Is it supposed to be more interesting in some way?

What Moby said. Some of the same appeal as bowhunting and muzzleloader hunting. Out here in the open west 200-400 yard rifle shots aren't uncommon. With a handgun you're much more likely to be taking a shot at 50 yards or less.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:13 AM
horizontal rule
53

Instead of getting weaker weapons, people should try hunting small game when they want a challenge. Bagging a swallow with a rifle would be something to brag about.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:15 AM
horizontal rule
54

Where I grew up deer hunting with guns is illegal, only bow hunting allowed.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
55

53: I still treasure the time I sat down in a new dentist's waiting room, leafed through the magazines on the table, and found a copy of Varmint Hunter.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
56

The only gun I ever had up close and personal dealings with was a Lee-Enfield. I'd rather be behind it than in front of it, even if it is a hundred years old.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
57

55: Were there ads for taxidermied squirrels in funny poses?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
58

only bow hunting allowed

If that includes crossbows, they might as well allow single shot rifles for all the good the prohibition is going to do.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
59

I'd rather be behind it than in front of it, even if it is a hundred years old.

It turns out this is generally true for weapons of all sorts dating back to time immemorial.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
60

But to summarize answers to the original question, aside from historical interest and legal restrictions, revolvers and bolt-action rifles are more accurate at any given price point, and the cost difference for a given degree of accuracy is significant enough to make them worth continuing to manufacture.

Have I got that straight?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:21 AM
horizontal rule
61

s/b "more accurate than semi-automatics"


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:21 AM
horizontal rule
62

Bagging a swallow with a rifle blowpipe would be something to brag about.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
63

59: Except for the Katyusha, which you should stand beside.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
64

Since the beginning of time, mankind has preferred yielding weapons over being targeted by weapon-yielders.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
65

A question was asked and answered with little ambiguity within 50 comments. Is the blog over?


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:23 AM
horizontal rule
66

Bagging a swallow with a rifle blowpipe by remaining motionless until it landed in your open hand would be something to brag about.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:23 AM
horizontal rule
67

I assume you're all talking about bagging a swallow in some different sense than a man bragging to his friends would talk about bagging a young lady he brought home last night.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
68

58- Long bow. And googling it, you have to pass a test each season, hitting a 9 inch target at 25 yards 3 times out of 3 to be able to enter the lottery for one of the available permits.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
69

(Because otherwise bagging a swallow with a rifle just sounds sick.)

(Whereas murdering a swallow with a gun for entertainment is perfectly sane.)


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
70

On the veldt, men often used hunting terminology to describe sexual conquests.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
71

revolvers and bolt-action rifles are more accurate at any given price point

And what Moby said in 3. If you want length and girth than revolvers are the way to go.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
72

66. Oh, hi, Kevin. Didn't notice you there.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:28 AM
horizontal rule
73

bagging a swallow with a rifle just sounds sick

But genuinely novel!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
74

72: "I meant what I said and I said what I meant: St. Kevin is faithful, one hundred percent!"


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
75

Novelty isn't everything.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
76

74 is great.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
77

Bagging a swallow with a rifle would be something to brag about.

There is little to do in this warehouse, so I get to shooting at rats with my .45. After a while I am good enough that I can hit a running rat five times out of five, and I am even good enough that I can hit it in the left eye or the right eye as I choose, though it is difficult afterwards to tell where you hit a rat with a .45, because you seem to hit him all over.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
78

Sorry, 77 is Damon Runyon (more or less, from memory).


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
79

78. I am thinking as it might be.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
80

rifles are accurate and hunting with automatics is like playing basketball on 6 foot rims.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
81

Is the blog over?

We still haven't established if this is a food thread or a sex thread.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
82

this thread is rifled for accuracy


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
83

We still haven't established if this is a food thread or a sex thread.

It's obviously a bike thread.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
84

Fired a Luger and a big-ass 45 revolver;carried a Saturday night special and a 22 LR target pistol, but the only gun I have ever had any interest in was Quigley's Sharp. Hitting a target a 500 yds+ looks like fun.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:59 AM
horizontal rule
85

77: "Aim between the eyes. Sometimes they charge when they're wounded."

Caption of a Bill Mauldin cartoon that I frustratingly cannot find online. Picture is Willie and Joe bedded down with one holding a revolver inches away from a rat illuminated by flashlight.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
86

My uncle went hunting rats one time and shot himself in the leg.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:04 AM
horizontal rule
87

Oh, hi, Kevin honey. Didn't notice you there.


Posted by: WIlliam S Burroughs | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
88

I once shot a rat in Reno, just to watch it die.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
89

Now he obsessively hunts for a great white rat.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
90

People working on my house have seen rats recently. I have deployed rat poison and moved the bird feeder to the back of the yard.

I am unhappy about all of the above.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
91

89 brought to mind a very recent Frankie Boyle tweet (via C. Stross).

I had sex on a beach once, it seemed like the kindest thing to do after I failed to get the whale back into the sea.

Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
92

90.1: Saw them outside at least. No evidence of internal incursion to date.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
93

You could get a .22, some beers, and a rocker. Then sit on the porch plinking rats.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
94

Our basement flooded a couple months ago and we were taking bags of clothes that had gotten wet out into the yard to sort, and there was squeaking coming from one, found eight 1-2 day old baby rats in the bag nested in some chewed clothes. Obviously I need a semiautomatic to deal with that many.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
95

I sat down in a new dentist's waiting room, leafed through the magazines on the table, and found a copy of Varmint Hunter.

Was Mitt Romney on the cover?

I would add to the already pretty thorough answers to the question in the OP that the action in a semi-automatic is powered by the explosion of the propellant in the barrel (i.e. the same force that is propelling the bullet forward), so you are siphoning off a little bit of oomph and sacrificing a little bit of muzzle velocity.


Posted by: knecht ruprecht | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
96

93: Maybe even shoot a few of them ("plink" = "bag", right?).


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:25 AM
horizontal rule
97

55: Varmint Hunter

Now this is a poignant cover.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
98

I'm glad somebody is trying to shoot that, whatever it is.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
99

OT: It turns out that there is an assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security and that person is responsible for security of diplomats. The ambassador to the U.N. probably does something else.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:36 AM
horizontal rule
100

It's adorable. Does anyone know if porcupines have the same confidence and calmness that makes wild skunks so completely charming?


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
101

Buck claims to have befriended a porcupine as a boy. (Sort of. It had a den in a cave in the woods behind his house. He started hanging out in the cave, and the porcupine decided that his presence wasn't a barrier to hanging out there as well. They weren't braiding each other's hair or anything.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:46 AM
horizontal rule
102

Is that a fretful porpentine? I mean, I would be fretful, too, if on the cover of a magazine with that name. But it's SWEET


Posted by: Nworb Werdna | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
103

100: My (not extensive) experience with them is that they are rather unflappable.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:57 AM
horizontal rule
104

Varmint is on Wikipedia's list of American words not widely used in the U.K. It's a list that really turns out to be not as interesting as I first thought it might.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 10:58 AM
horizontal rule
105

My dad's family used to spend summers up in the Sierras near Lassen in a cabin his father built right after WWII. When he was a teenager and tying his own flies he once spotted a porcupine walking near the cabin and decided to try and get some of the quills for fly tying. He grabbed a sweatshirt and ran up and swung it at the porcupine thinking he'd get a couple dozen quills or so. He was a bit dismayed at having to spend a couple hours pulling hundreds of them out of that sweatshirt.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
106

It probably took even longer for the porcupine to regrow the quills.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 11:10 AM
horizontal rule
107

Porcupines are a lot bigger than you'd think. Also they smell like an unwashed armpit.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 11:12 AM
horizontal rule
108

105: A friend had to cut short a Sierra backpack trip when he randomly (no encounter) managed to get a quill in his leg and it became infected.

My favorite encounter was when one took shelter behind my British hiking companion's pack in the Canadian Rockies. He went to pick it up the pack and suddenly retreated yelling about "some bloody beast". It took a good while for him to convince it to move along while I provided running commentary on his lack of porcupine-moving-along form.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 11:18 AM
horizontal rule
109

A friend had to cut short a Sierra backpack trip when he randomly (no encounter) managed to get a quill in his leg and it became infected.

Better than having to cut short his leg...


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 11:19 AM
horizontal rule
110

Varmint is on Wikipedia's list of American words not widely used in the U.K.

This is what happens when a culture is deprived of Yosemite Sam.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
111

Preach it, Brother Spike.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
112

OK, so Paul Waldman just linked this piece from Harper's a couple years ago, and now I'm really annoyed and wanting to talk about it.

It's basically written by a self-described liberal Democrat/gun lover who decides to start carrying concealed, and it's about his experiences and his conclusions. And by the end, there's just a staggering blindness to how much he's absorbed all of this gun culture bullshit. I mean, he describes how the 2 required training courses were much more about indoctrination than about, you know, safe gun practices, and he quotes fellow gun nuts saying self-evidently moronic things, but when he has to list the reasons he thinks people object to more guns in general, and concealed carry in particular, his list is pretty much what you'd read in the NRA magazine. Nothing about the fact that people who actually live in houses with guns are many, many more times likely to be wounded and killed*; nothing about the enormous likelihood of injury and death to innocent bystanders (cops do a bad job with this; in what universe would paranoid civilians do better?); nothing about the fact that drawing a gun on a mugger is not, in fact, a sane response. Just a lot of fantasies about how, even with the crime rate down, life on the streets is so fantastically dangerous that carrying a firearm all the time (note: dude lives in Boulder) is sensible self-defense.

* I suppose he'd argue that carrying a gun somehow obviates this fact; it goes unstated


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:13 PM
horizontal rule
113

What in tarnation!?


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:15 PM
horizontal rule
114

112: Somewhat similarly, I found it telling that the "Mission Statement" of Varmint Magazine is,


To preserve our 2nd Amendment Rights by introducing individuals to the shooting sports and to provide the right tools and resources. Our magazine and events do just that!!!
Rather than, you know, the joy of hunting and killing small things or what have you.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:24 PM
horizontal rule
115

Nothing about the fact that people who actually live in houses with guns are many, many more times likely to be wounded and killed

To be fair, in that passage he's talking strictly about carrying a gun, not having one period. And I don't get the sense that he's blind to how much gun culture he's absorbed; in general the piece reads pretty balanced to me. (It's entirely possible that *I've* absorbed too much gun culture to see his response as unbalanced, though. I've been thinking a lot about that the past few days.)


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
116

the joy of hunting and killing small things

I see that Moby Hick finally nailed the wording on that mission statement.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:28 PM
horizontal rule
117

We had to resist pressure from the snake-lover lobby.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
118

Yeah, it was a relatively small mission statement so he killed it.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
119

115: It's like you don't even see asterisks

In all seriousness, I would be shocked if having a gun in the home resulted in 5X (or whatever; it's an integer) the odds of suicide/domestic shooting/accidental death, but carrying one every day resulted in no change at all.

I thought it was fairly balanced until I got towards the end, at which point he just dismissed any possible downside to concealed carry; the fact that he doesn't seem to understand that, in a falling-crime environment, one shouldn't expect to see concealed carry resulting in rising gun deaths didn't endear his thinking to me. He basically seemed to feel that, since gun crime has declined nationwide even as concealed carry has spread, it's proof that there are NO safety-related downsides to concealed carry (he did acknowledge the fashion-related downsides, so that part was fair and balanced).

Also, and I don't really blame him for not getting/getting into this, he missed the import of the "Condition Yellow" mindset. Set aside the - massive IMO - social implications, there's the simple fact that what he describes as "exhausting" is actually longterm debilitating. We have all sorts of evidence that extended periods of that kind of vigilance/awareness are awful for mental health.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 12:57 PM
horizontal rule
120

the fact that he doesn't seem to understand that, in a falling-crime environment, one shouldn't expect to see concealed carry resulting in rising gun deaths didn't endear his thinking to me.

Well, in a falling-crime environment, you'd expect domestic shootings to go down, but I'm not immediately seeing why it'd affect suicides or accidental shootings.

Totally agreed on your last paragraph, though.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:07 PM
horizontal rule
121

I was amused that while looking for a Wayne LaPierre Quote from back in the day (see following comment), I managed to activate this message on a popup.

Searching for jack booted government thugs?
Find Retail Careers Here!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:18 PM
horizontal rule
122

LaPierre (now NRA prez) back in 1995:

"...the semiauto-auto ban gives jack-booted government thugs more power to take away our constitutional rights, break in our doors, seize our guns, destroy our property, and even injure or kill us."
This caused GHW Bush to publicly resign from the NRA.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:22 PM
horizontal rule
123

I shot a squirrel with a rifle on thanksgiving.


Posted by: Light Rail Tycoon | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:24 PM
horizontal rule
124

How the squirrel got the rifle, I'll never know.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:27 PM
horizontal rule
125

"How the squirrel got a rifle I have no idea, but I thought it best to shoot first and ask questions later."


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:27 PM
horizontal rule
126

Moby Hick is a confirmed poopyhead who delights in killing small things and porcupines.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:28 PM
horizontal rule
127

I'm like an adult who is like a kid waiting for Christmas break. Not getting much done this week.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:33 PM
horizontal rule
128

127: The analogy ban two-step?


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:37 PM
horizontal rule
129

Also, the last two cases listed here, both of which happened 5 years before the guy wrote his Harper's piece, pretty much explicate the flaws in the idea that concealed carry solves any real world problems.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:39 PM
horizontal rule
130

127: I'm like that person only things theoretically need to get done.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
131

128: I think metaphor is permitted.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
132

131: IYKWIMAITYD.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:44 PM
horizontal rule
133

129: The obvious rejoinder being that "mass shootings" != "all real world problems".


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
134

But just to show I haven't been completely brainwashed, the guy does make one claim I find completely bonkers: in a post on his blog talking about the Aurora shooting he says "well, if I'd been there and had my gun and started shooting in response, it couldn't have made the situation any worse". Uh... really?


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
135

133: Oh sure, but there are no problems he's imagining that don't involve pulling out a gun in public and firing it, and the results don't seem to be paying off. He explicitly rejects brandishing, and he tries to keep his gun hidden, which means that the only time the gun does any good (or might as well even exist) is when it's drawn and fired. Which tends to have bad outcomes. Maybe he'd argue that joining Condition Yellow is a good that justified concealed carry but, aside from 119.last, I don't think that your* right to a security blanket extends to bringing a killing weapon within range of my vital organs. I find that I'm cognizant of my surroundings just fine, even unarmed.

I bet that an intermittent steering feature on cars would lead to much more alert drivers than we currently have.

134: Wow, that's much crazier than anything in his article, but reinforces my sense that joining the concealed carry community warped his mind.

* generic you, of course


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 2:14 PM
horizontal rule
136

http://news.byu.edu/archive12-mar-bearsandguns.aspx


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 2:49 PM
horizontal rule
137

Bear spray: Now in UC Davis-size for the ultimate protection.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 2:54 PM
horizontal rule
138

105: What flies do you tie with porcupine quills? The only "quill" I know in flytying is either stripped peacock herl or stripped hackle.

It's obviously another American usage unknown here.

And no, it is not my fault that the easiest illustration for peacock herl turns out to be a fly tied by a woman that is very small and has a pink wing. That is the fault of the patriarchy.



Posted by: Nworb Werdna | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
139

I find that I'm cognizant of my surroundings just fine, even unarmed.

My anxiety says otherwise!


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
140

What flies do you tie with porcupine quills?

I don't think it was a specific pattern. He'd be up there for around two months and would fish every day. He did a lot of experimentation just looking around at what he'd see locally and from looking in the stomachs of the fish. (habit he has to this day, grandkids invariably find it fascinating and daughters in law usually are a bit grossed out) His tying box has stuff in it you don't see on the shelves anymore, like polar bear hair.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
141

His tying box has stuff in it you don't see on the shelves anymore, like polar bear hair.

Tell us he collected that with a sweatshirt and I'll be impressed.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 3:29 PM
horizontal rule
142

This is amusing. Seward is the school that most of my anarchist friends send their kids to. It is located in a neighborhood mostly occupied by professorial types, a couple of blocks from a big natural foods coop and an anarchist/vegetarian collective restaurant. Not that there's no crime, there was a very high-profile armed robbery that led to 3 deaths by shooting a few years ago, but during school hours? I think errant porcupines are probably the only varmints you're going to need to shoot there.

http://www.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/184147411.html


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
143

My anxiety says otherwise!

By all means, let's arm the anxious.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
144

Varmint hunting has it's own rewards.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-12 9:49 PM
horizontal rule
145

140: Thanks. I have a vague idea that they are buoyant and could be used for hollow bodies on large dry flies. But you remind me of my absolute favourite proto-nerd response from a fly tier, when Charles Cotton is teased about the stuff he collects for tying:

VIAT. Did ever any one see the like! What a heap of trumpery is here! certainly never an Angler in Europe has his shop half so well furnished as you have.
PISC. You, perhaps, may think now that I rake together this trumpery, as you call it, for show only; to the end that such as see it, which are not many I assure you, may think me a great master in the art of Angling; but let me tell you here are some colors, as contemptible as they seem here, that are very hard to be got; and scarce any one of them, which, if it should be lost, I should not miss, and be concerned about the loss of it too, once in the year. But look you, Sir, amongst all these I will choose out these two colors only, of which, this is bear's hair, this darker, no great matter what: but I am sure I have killed a great deal of fish with it; and with one or both of these, you shall take Trout or Grayling this very day, notwithstanding all disadvantages, or my art shall fail me.

Izaak Walton and Charles Cotton (2000-11-01). The Compleat Angler (Modern Library Classics) (Kindle Locations 3600-3607). Random House, Inc.. Kindle Edition.


Posted by: Nworb Werdna | Link to this comment | 12-20-12 2:24 AM
horizontal rule
146

84: you just knew McManus would be the Unfogged Sniper.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 12-20-12 4:57 AM
horizontal rule
147

All the shooting I ever did was while I was in the CCF (army cadets) at school, in the 80s. Probably a fairly common experience in the UK. There was also indoor range shooting on offer: that was done with 22 Anschutz rifles, which didn't even have magazines: you definitely had to put a bullet in the thing each time. I don't think you'd want a semi-auto mechanism on something like that. You wouldn't want anything moving in there aside from the round, on its way to the target.

However, by far the best all round rifle we got to play with was the service issue SA80 (not the cadet version). Light, user friendly and very accurate. Clearly highly optimised for shooting people. Generally, I try to think of guns the way I think of construction site tools. Sometimes needed but potentially very harmful, and isn't the sale of construction explosives tightly regulated? The associations with hunting are not helpful.


Posted by: Charlie W | Link to this comment | 12-20-12 9:13 AM
horizontal rule
148

I was really bummed to look inside that Varmint Hunter Magazine issue to discover that it was actually all about guns.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-20-12 3:48 PM
horizontal rule
149

138: a fly tied by a woman that is very small and has a pink wing. That is the fault of the patriarchy.

Some women are just naturally small, I don't think that's the patriarchy's fault.

No idea about the pink wing, though.


Posted by: Benquo | Link to this comment | 12-20-12 8:07 PM
horizontal rule
150

The following just appeared up in my inbox.

The primary-school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians really serve.

The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn�t work they will continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot fight back against government tyranny.

Newtown is the U.S.A.�s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns from the U.K. It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.

It�s always the same people behind it � the gun-grabbers who want the people to be defenceless against the gun-grabbers� employers � the banksters who own all of the politicians. They get their politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people�s freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.

The Dunblane massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the elite paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100 years, which is proof of the above.

Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton and made it look like Hamilton committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn�t be questioned. Hamilton was found in the school gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on either side of Hamilton�s body.

The autopsy revealed that Hamilton was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes. There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a second shooter who killed Hamilton.

Similarly, the first reports from Newtown were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.

Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.

Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don�t fall for it. Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.

All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning the people from having guns. It works the same in every country � Hungerford in England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur in Australia and the list in America is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans� love of guns and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the government.

Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and Chairman Mao, to name just three.

If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters, their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free zones.

From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:01 PM
horizontal rule
151

Student?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:09 PM
horizontal rule
152

Human Resources?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:21 PM
horizontal rule
153

Chancellor?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:21 PM
horizontal rule
154

Coblogger?


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:22 PM
horizontal rule
155

People are really the biggest impediment to problem-solving.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:23 PM
horizontal rule
156

At least the security gun ownership brings gives people peace of mind.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:24 PM
horizontal rule
157

People who fear people who want to keep guns from paranoid people are the luckiest people of all.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:26 PM
horizontal rule
158

Why am I always so unlucky?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
159

Mind control.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:42 PM
horizontal rule
160

to Major Tom.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 5:44 PM
horizontal rule
161

Floating, gunless.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 6:05 PM
horizontal rule
162

Eating from a tin can.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 6:15 PM
horizontal rule
163

And may Gun's love be with you.


Posted by: heebie-heebie | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 6:23 PM
horizontal rule
164

Student? Human Resources? Chancellor? Coblogger?

Nosflow.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 6:32 PM
horizontal rule
165

I've actually been one of your cobloggers and one of your students all along, VW.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 6:33 PM
horizontal rule
166

The e-mail came from inside the house!


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 12-22-12 6:45 PM
horizontal rule