Re: Survey

1

Much previous political-science research assumes that municipal politics are largely non-ideological.

Really? I'm shocked. I'm sure all of our Republic ex-mayors would agree.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 5:23 AM
horizontal rule
2

Republic->Republican


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 5:23 AM
horizontal rule
3

Oh my god the yellow and green axis with different values is making me want to stab. Did Sifu design that graph?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 5:31 AM
horizontal rule
4

I guess I see why they did it, but it befuddled me on my phone for a while.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 5:33 AM
horizontal rule
5

If they didn't do that how would they make you understand those values are correlated?


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 5:34 AM
horizontal rule
6

5 before seeing 4.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 5:34 AM
horizontal rule
7

I think the chart in the 2nd link would be much more informative if it also showed the rating for the entire SMSA in which the city lies.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 6:48 AM
horizontal rule
8

For what I want to see,anyway. Since the paper itself was looking at governance I can see why they would do it by the cities themselves.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 6:53 AM
horizontal rule
9

Even nearly all-white cities have Democratic leadership for the most part. A party of racial minorities and city dwellers, vs. a party of rural and suburban white people. Just like it was 130 years ago, except at that time it was just "rural" white people.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 6:55 AM
horizontal rule
10

Percentage of kids born out of wedlock in countries around the world.

If by "world" you mean "Europe plus the United States"...


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 7:06 AM
horizontal rule
11

Omaha seems to be pretty competitive between the two parts, possibly because it is allowed to swallow its suburbs. Or just because Nebraska.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
12

"Parts" s/b "parties"


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
13

I always mix up George Sanders and George Saunders but I like them both so who cares, Edith?


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 9:47 AM
horizontal rule
14

13 -- Anaheim isn't all bad. It even has a downtown ... downtown Disney. And weirdly decent train connections.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
15

16 1 True, though paradoxically in order to have a liberal enclave suburban existence* you have to be very rich (your town, Malibu, Marin County).

*offer guaranteed for social liberalism only. Not valid for issues personally affecting wallets or lifestyles of residents. See zoning plan for details.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
16

16 is a lie. I recently visited PDBS and found it totally lacking in "suburban amenities." I.e. it was a pain in the ass to drive in.


Posted by: L. | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 10:45 AM
horizontal rule
17

Plenty of suburbs are pains in the asses to drive in. The amenity is that you have to drive. Keeps out anybody who can't afford a car and DUI lawyers.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 10:47 AM
horizontal rule
18

The hivemind came up with Jacksonville, Colorado Springs, and Virginia Beach, all with caveats.

And Lubbock, which I presume doesn't show up in the linked survey because its population falls under the 250K cutoff.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 08-15-14 6:34 PM
horizontal rule