Re: Work

1

Ha, I had also flagged this to post.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 4:43 PM
horizontal rule
2

The obvious solution is for America's universities to introduce a Master of Indie Arts program, allowing MIA credential-holders with at least one released album to receive health insurance and a living wage by teaching the fundamentals of indie craft to workshops full of MIA aspirants. I predict soaring enrollments!


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 5:00 PM
horizontal rule
3

Make sure your kids go into finance.

Can't. We're gentiles, but not WASPs.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 5:15 PM
horizontal rule
4

Petroleum engineering to the rescue!


Posted by: Kreskin | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 7:12 PM
horizontal rule
5

Best of both worlds, work on the financing of the Keystone Pipeline. Profit!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 7:22 PM
horizontal rule
6

I'm sure all the oil rushing through that pipeline will make a range of sounds that can be sampled and constructed into beautiful songs.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 7:29 PM
horizontal rule
7

It's actually an ambitious performance art installation.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 7:46 PM
horizontal rule
8

One thing I don't know is to what extent the Internet-enabled creative-class-as-starving-entrepreneurs model has skewed the earlier model of Steve Albini's trench of shit.


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:05 PM
horizontal rule
9

I couldn't believe jack conte was the person behind patreon in addition to all his other hustles. I cannot believe how productive people with inspiration can be. It is basically incredibly depressing.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
10

I couldn't believe jack conte was the person behind patreon in addition to all his other hustles. I cannot believe how productive people with inspiration can be. It is basically incredibly depressing.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
11

I think I was once one of them... I'm really having trouble figuring out when it all started to go away.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:30 PM
horizontal rule
12

So, am I just too old for Pomplamoose and associated acts? Anyone want to advocate?


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:51 PM
horizontal rule
13

The name is familiar, but I can't thing of a song.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:52 PM
horizontal rule
14

"think of a song."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:53 PM
horizontal rule
15

I'm the person who never heard of Feist until she was on Sesame Street.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:54 PM
horizontal rule
16

And then somebody had to explain to me that she wasn't a children's singer but apparently wrote a song called "1, 2, 3, 4" for adults.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 8:57 PM
horizontal rule
17

I really enjoy [Pomplamoose's] covers, and like about 2 in 7 of their originals. Associated acts? Eh. I play Wade Johnston's Christmas Spectacular from 2008 for the kids; they love it.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 9:00 PM
horizontal rule
18

17.cont'd: Okay, so do I. The only Christmas songs I like.

My Terrible Friend's got like 3 songs, all of which are competent-to-excellent. Most of the rest are too twee even for me.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 9:07 PM
horizontal rule
19

band you've probably heard of

Nobody told you that your blog audience got old?


Posted by: Todd | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 9:08 PM
horizontal rule
20

This blog's audience was always already old. But that band has been discussed here before.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 9:16 PM
horizontal rule
21

I was into the first handful of Pomplamoose covers but everything seemed to go downhill later. It's one of those things where the band has skill set A that you like and skill set B that's, meh, but as time goes by they go all-in on skill B. (in this case A = clever instrumental arranging, great sense of rhythm, B = quirky deadpan acting skills)

Maybe what I actually like is shoestring budgets and artistic stasis.


Posted by: Scomber mix | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 9:24 PM
horizontal rule
22

The two headliners came out behind on their tour, but part of that is that they paid their hired band decently. The musicians they hired came out ahead on this tour. So, like, three of five musicians did fine by touring. Just not Pomplemoose.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 9:59 PM
horizontal rule
23

I have a friend who was in a band you've probably never heard of, but was reasonably successful. They toured cross country, opened for some really major acts, and sold out every concert. They broke even, which made them a viable band. Interestingly,* my friend's father, a former hippy, wanted him to drop out of his Ivy League school to pursue music, but my friend decided to leave the band and finish his degree. He now performs locally with a different band, and they get booked at some pretty serious venues. He still has his day job roasting coffee.

*Interesting in that the adults in my life are more counter-culture than their children.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 10:01 PM
horizontal rule
24

Speaking of different social mores, I am pretty sure I'd be disowned if I went into finance. Having a well-paid job supporting the status quo is well below building cob houses or being an organic subsistence farmer in the hierarchy of acceptability. Things like lawyer are only acceptable if you're working for progressive causes.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 10:06 PM
horizontal rule
25

Pomplamoose seems ok but I watched a few videos and saw the commercial where they did Christmas songs and the singer's hipster affectless facial expression thing really struck me as deeply annoying.


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 11:07 PM
horizontal rule
26

22: And then, of course, they got a bunch of comments saying "Of course you lost money, you bothered to pay your backup musicians decently."


Posted by: Micah | Link to this comment | 11-25-14 11:25 PM
horizontal rule
27

I don't understand why they didn't get those musicians to work for free. Don't they know about the value of exposure?


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 4:25 AM
horizontal rule
28

Let me be the first to suggest they not pay their backup musicians.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 4:43 AM
horizontal rule
29

I didn't realize Pomplamoose had started doing original songs. I was aware of them only for doing covers on YouTube.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 6:50 AM
horizontal rule
30

As per TFA, I know, or am at least acquainted with, several successful or semi-successful indie musicians. I used to have a pretty good idea how much at least one of them made, because we shared a flat, but I could probably hazard a pretty decent guess on how much some of the others made, too, based on where they lived, and what their places looked like, etc.

I don't think any of them were/are making more money than they would have made if they'd come out of college and gotten 'proper' jobs, and a surprising number do the odd bit of casual or part-time work to bridge gaps between tours and albums. But at the same time, I expect given a choice between making, say, a teacher's salary and being a teacher, or making a teacher's salary and being an international touring/recording musician, they would all be pretty happy they've chosen the latter.*

* with the downside that music careers can be fairly finite, or tail off.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
31

The other version of "they lost money because they paid their backup artists musicians" would be "they lost money because they decided to tour with six backup musicians, which they openly admit is an awful lot of backup musicians given the music they play." The fact that they lost money is significant, but they also straight up say that they spent a lot of money they didn't actually need to spend because they viewed the whole thing as an investment in future earnings.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:13 AM
horizontal rule
32

I assume "investment in their future" is true, but they wouldn't have minded turning a profit.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
33

I production-managed one of the shows they mention in their essay. They seemed nice enough, a touch amaeteurish but basically together. I have no memory of the music at all. This comment has added minimal value to the discussion but what can you do.


Posted by: freight train | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 10:20 AM
horizontal rule
34

I was chatting the other day with the mom of one of the members of a local band, they've released two albums and have a contract, play gigs regularly. Adorably, they have to hang out outside when it isn't their set at most gigs because they aren't yet 21. The mom was mostly worried about when was it time to pull the plug on the full time music thing and go to uni, but she seemed to have it in decent perspective. Their a pretty good band, we have both their albums.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 10:28 AM
horizontal rule
35

I know one of the three lesser Decemberists pretty well and they needed money from their parents to buy a house. And the Decemberists are at about the top of the indie world. The top two guys get the writing royalties and various invitations independent of the band and they've probably have got it made, in a solid middle class sense but not more.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 2:50 PM
horizontal rule
36

I thought your son was a Decemberist. Did I get completely confused, or was he in a different band?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 2:55 PM
horizontal rule
37

Do bands named after successful revolutions do better on earnings?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 2:57 PM
horizontal rule
38

So, you'd look at Paul Revere and the Raiders... anyone else?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
39

Depends. Has Delaware been destroyed?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
40

On the Her Majesty album. He got pretty good money but not enough to live on. He left the band before it got famous. He's the Pete Best or whatever.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
41

Jethro Tull, unless we're restricted to political revolutions.


Posted by: idp | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 3:04 PM
horizontal rule
42

And the Decemberists are at about the top of the indie world. The top two guys get the writing royalties and various invitations independent of the band and they've probably have got it made, in a solid middle class sense but not more.

I think I remember reading somewhere that the top guys in TV On The Radio were making $150K-$250K/yr at their peak. And that has to averaged out against the many years before that when they weren't making enough from music to pay rent.

So, enough to buy a house, if you happen to be in one of the most successful indie bands of the decade.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 3:50 PM
horizontal rule
43

That is, enough to buy a house so long as you're not in or near an expensive city.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 3:54 PM
horizontal rule
44

For example, in ND -- away from the oilfields.

3 BR 1 bath, $27,900, $103 / month. Why isn't ND full of Indy bands?

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1234-Western-Ave-Grafton-ND-58237/2104564990_zpid/


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 6:20 PM
horizontal rule
45

||
Will this lure the heavy metal fanboy into another thread?

Ruben Bolling does "Richard Scarry's 21st Century Busytown Jobs ." The pig is a "content aggregator" caught in the act of ripping off a "content creator."
|>


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 6:28 PM
horizontal rule
46

44: Maybe it is.

But none of us have probably heard of any of them.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 6:29 PM
horizontal rule
47

46: bravo


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 6:40 PM
horizontal rule
48

I just realized the last sentence of my 33 should have been "And then they made $5." Dammit.


Posted by: freight train | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 7:11 PM
horizontal rule
49

The line item I was most surprised by was light rental. Bands at Fillmore-sized venues don't generally have notable lighting design (that's, like, an arena show thing). Between that and hauling their own amps, they probably could have made a small profit.


Posted by: Yawnoc | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
50

Actually, a lot of bands touring venues that size carry lighting packages, to set on the ground around the band. With all the fancy moving lights these days, you can carry very compact, efficient packages that add a lot of consistent production value. All the more so because some venues at this level - House of Blues, Fillmore - have a lot of lighting already, but many venues at this level don't, so if you want a good show you have to bring it. If I remember this band's evening correctly, the notable thing about their lighting package was that it was kinda homemade and funky, not what most bands at that level carry. But I imagine that's a function of them financing everything themselves.


Posted by: freight train | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 8:40 PM
horizontal rule
51

Super interesting freight train.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 8:44 PM
horizontal rule
52

After ten fucking years reading this blog, I finally see it touch on my field of expertise. You bet I'll go on about this all night if I can.


Posted by: freight train | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 8:47 PM
horizontal rule
53

What's funny is I've been to the venues you mention and others and honestly? I'm a total philistine and never noticed the lights. That's me, though. I'm given to understand that I'm pretty idiosyncratic about music in some ways.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 8:57 PM
horizontal rule
54

43 - and, pretty much by definition, successful musicians have to live/work in a few expensive cities - London, New York, LA - or else factor in travel to those cities as a major cost.

(Am sure there are people who don't fit that. But it's pretty hard to make it in the culture/media industries from North Dakota.)


Posted by: Keir | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 8:59 PM
horizontal rule
55

Portland has been the home of a lot of musicians who flew into LA to work. But now Portland isn't cheap any more.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:02 PM
horizontal rule
56

Nobody ever notices the lights, or if they do, it's some momentary flashy thing that's a byproduct of something else. The only place the "correct" light show exists is in the lighting designer's head, and no one will ever know if it's achieved, or care. Yet tour lighting designers will insist on great and unrealistic effort and cost to achieve that show, even if the day's parameters are totally unsuited to it. Sometimes I think it's just a racket. NB I am totally objective about this.


Posted by: freight train | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:09 PM
horizontal rule
57

Maybe the really good lighting is the lighting you don't notice at all.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:13 PM
horizontal rule
58

I'm so glad you said more, freight train! Having people pop up with pertinent and personal information is one of the best things about this blog.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:17 PM
horizontal rule
59

They had the best blacklights ever in Winterland.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:30 PM
horizontal rule
60

Nobody ever notices the lights, or if they do, it's some momentary flashy thing that's a byproduct of something else.

*Ahem.*


Posted by: Opinionated Guy Who Got Blinded By a Laser | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 9:56 PM
horizontal rule
61

When I was seventeen and my sister was fourteen we went to see the Arizona Opera do Das Rheingold. The only comment my sister had about it afterward was that she loved the lighting design.


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 10:28 PM
horizontal rule
62

The lighting design at The Old Woman was really good. Better than the adaptation, I thought. (In the program notes Willem Dafoe wrote "I heard Bob Wilson say recently that one thing he's learned through the years is 'to enter the rehearsal room with no ideas, with a blank book.'" Guess what: when you do that, you end up with Standard Robert Wilson Play #19, a sort of colloid in which bits of Kharms are suspended, but somewhat smothered. Great lighting, though!)


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 11-26-14 11:00 PM
horizontal rule