Re: Weddings

1

First the gays, now fat people? Who won't we let get married?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
2

This piece by her husband is pretty good, although it peters out a bit at the end.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
3

They seem nice and all, but a public wedding proposal still seems like a bad idea.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
4

If there's any doubt about the response, yes. If it's a theatrical moment for a couple who's already kinda-explicitly agreed that they're getting married, not so bad. Not my thing, but not so bad.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
5

I can easily see a guy who has no doubt about the response because he's that kind of a guy, not because it's been discussed. Mostly, I just don't like to do anything in public.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
6

I had a real crisis of conscience when one member of the couple who hosts the weekly potluck I sometimes go to decided to use the potluck to propose publicly, which is something I've always thought was weird and gross. But I brought food and helped decorate and the two of them were adorable and happy and were already living together and raising kids, so a shocking rejection wasn't likely. Their wedding was lovely and then they got to be poster children for marriage equality in their state but not part of the Supreme Court case since they'd had an extralegal wedding.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 10:12 AM
horizontal rule
7

||

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/21/science/playing-mozart-piano-pieces-as-mozart-did.html


This is quite interesting.

>


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 10:26 AM
horizontal rule
8

That's very cool. Is it really true that modern players hold their forearms almost perpendicular to the keyboard? That doesn't seem right.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
9

I just searched for my one of my favourite videos, of a woman saying no to a public proposal. I did find this, which is similar. Searching for "rejected proposal" on google video turns up lots of very similar ones. The common theme is that it's the job of the mascot to comfort the rejected guy.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
10

8: Yeah that seems weird to me too. The "old" way described in that piece is exactly the way I was taught way back in the .. 1980's. Sit up straight, elbows at your sides, wrists slightly above the keyboard. Maybe some super-intense concert performers hunch over the keyboard with their forearms vertical, but I'd be very surprised if that's orthodox technique nowadays.


Posted by: Osgood Yousbad | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
11

9: That is awesome. I love how the mascot gives the guy a beer at the end.


Posted by: LizSpigot | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
12

10 is my experience, too, and Hawaii seems to be getting taught the exact same thing.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:08 AM
horizontal rule
13

I mean, I don't doubt the research is very cool, but that article didn't describe it in a way that made me understand what was different.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
14

9: BUT WHAT ABOUT COMFORTING THE HONEST WOMAN??? I am not even joking about this. It made me sort of ill to watch and I should probably feel awful for both of them, but there she is walking away with a fucking camera in her face.... Ugh.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:24 AM
horizontal rule
15

Honesty is its own reward.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
16

That was me even joking.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
17

But, when I think of "public proposal," my first thought is about the mortification of public rejection. My second thought is about the emotional and social blackmail of the proposee by the proposer because of the mortification of public rejection and how that is probably not even a little bit unintentional in most cases.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
18

9: That is awesome. I love how the mascot gives the guy a beer at the end.

That is awesome and horrible and hard to watch (for the reasons that Thorn mentions.). I did notice, however, that when the woman walks past the camera on the floor it doesn't follow her -- the cameraman lets her walk past and doesn't turn. Small favors. . . .


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:35 AM
horizontal rule
19

The article linked in the OP and the selected pull-quote are both fabulous, however.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
20

19: Agreed! The article linked in 2 is great too.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:45 AM
horizontal rule
21

17 is my hangup, yes.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
22

I'm going to have to add "radical" to my list of prohibited words, joining "awesome," "palimpsest," "Yeats," "pas de deux," "fine writing," "pimpmobile" et al.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
23

Yeah, I felt bad and a bit horrified/frightened for the woman. How horrible to be put on the spot like that, just the look on her face. Emotional blackmail is right. Ugh. Why do people do this?

The mascot reminded me of the strange and discomfiting phenomenon of mascots observing minute's silences.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:58 AM
horizontal rule
24

I don't think you need to go as far as Hitler did and only propose in an underground bunker. I'm just saying that bringing in the whole family or a bunch of sports fans is way too much.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:58 AM
horizontal rule
25

From working in the kitchens of high end restaurants let me tell you how bad an idea the public proposal is, universally loathed by restaurant staff. Even if it's just the two people at a small table, there really is a decent chance there will be a rejection and boy howdy does that ruin the evening for everyone, staff, fellow diners, etc. Bad idea! Don't do it! Poisons the entire dining room for the rest of the night.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
26

Better 23 is Moby at 17 which is just so right on the money.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
27

22: Dude, sometimes "palimpsest" and/or (!) "Yeats" are the only words that will do.

Agreed on "radical," though.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
28

23.2 is so amazing and makes me completely happy. Sorry that I am humorless and unfun about other stuff!


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
29

14: I wholeheartedly agree. Poor woman just about ran out of there.

17 is right. I've been completely thrown off my work for the afternoon by reading about rejected proposals. There are quite a few stories of saying yes under public pressure and then retracting it in private.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:11 PM
horizontal rule
30

28 Glad to be of service.

Don't give up on "pimpmobile" Flippanter, it's still got some mileage left.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:16 PM
horizontal rule
31

Wait, what's wrong with "palimpsest", "Yeats", or "pas de deux"?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
32

Yes, 14 and 17 are right. On the other hand, there are public proposals, and there are public proposals.


Posted by: Osgood Yousbad | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
33

That stylish young poet, John Keats,
Was shocked when he first met Bill Yeats,
For the latter was clad
Like a suburban dad
In tennies and t-shirt and sweats.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:27 PM
horizontal rule
34

Speaking of heretofore undiscovered manuscripts, I hear that the new Harper Lee novel just sucks. Not just the "Atticus Finch is a racist in it!" complaint, but it's described as "dreadful," "embarrassing," "not something you want to bother to finish," something that "should have stayed in the vault," "very bad excuse for a novel," "due for the remainder bin."


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
35

8: I think it depends on how you think of the orientation of the keyboard. I assume what they meant is that you're pressing the keys directly downwards, so it's easier to think of the keyboard as pointing upwards, and then (modern style) you're holding your forearms perpendicular to that.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:36 PM
horizontal rule
36

the failed marriage proposal bit at professional sports games is faked using actors:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/blog/puck_daddy/post/Sources-Failed-Rangers-proposal-a-hoax?urn=nhl,219631

This is a brutal marriage proposal prank (part of a brutal series of escalating pranks):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMHidjDB_Uk


Posted by: lemmy caution | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
37

Speaking of heretofore undiscovered manuscripts, I hear that the new Harper Lee novel just sucks. Not just the "Atticus Finch is a racist in it!" complaint, but it's described as "dreadful," "embarrassing," "not something you want to bother to finish," something that "should have stayed in the vault," "very bad excuse for a novel," "due for the remainder bin."

Probably that's why she resisted all efforts to publish it over the last 50 years of her pre-dementia life.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:10 PM
horizontal rule
38

36: Possibly they are all faked, but then I have to assume the accepted ones are fake, which seems unlikely.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
39

34: I sort of disagree. I just finished it and I found it fascinating.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:15 PM
horizontal rule
40

Could you tell us all how it ends?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
41

23.2, 28 Oh god, this.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
42

41 to 40.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:27 PM
horizontal rule
43

39: I'm afraid I don't expect to read it, so I can't say. I can imagine that the treatment, the subject matter, is fascinating, esp. as a follow-up (or precursor) to To Kill a Mockingbird, particularly as, from what I understand, it's written in the third person, while TKAM was in the first. It's just that if it's really badly written, like seriously badly written, I might find that a barrier.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:37 PM
horizontal rule
44

40: After first discovering that Atticus is a racist, Scout then goes on to discover that Calpurnia is her mother. When she confronts Atticus he mocks her as being a mongrel, and she kills him and then subsequently herself. Her last words are "God Damn America!".


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
45

Thanks.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
46

45: You're welcome. I hope no one minded the spoilers.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
47

A private wedding proposal means the guy is ashamed of his bride, so ashamed that he's proposing (literally!) to take advantage of a public institution to publicly proclaim that they are a couple? I'm pretty sure that his family and friends might have noticed when he suddenly had a wife! Only thin girls get public proposals? "Fat women shouldn't have to prove" that they're hot/attractive/can get male approval but that public wedding proposal is totally different because that proves that she's... well, honestly, I'm not sure.

I mean, yeah, the wedding-industrial complex is dumb and way too focused on appearance for your perfect day, and trying to turn yourself into a size two to fit a gown that was made to be easy to alter instead of to be flattering is dumb.

(Not a fan of the dress, alas. Shape and cut are fine, but the color just disappears into her.)


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
48

47: She was drunk when she went on that tirade. I don't think it was ever supposed to hold up to academic scrutiny.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
49

My drunken tirades are golden.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
50

49 Peer reviewed even.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
51

They make a splash.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
52

48: Yeah, but the rest of the piece about how it's a political statement to propose publicly to a hated body in front of...family, friends, and four random drunks? Eh, sometimes drunken rants don't need to be justified later on, you know?


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:24 PM
horizontal rule
53

The sober version she gives is:

the longer I live in a fat body, the harder it is to depoliticise even simple acts. A public proposal to a publicly valued body might be personally significant, but culturally it shifts nothing. A public proposal to a publicly reviled body is a political statement.

which is not well-paraphrased by 47.1.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:36 PM
horizontal rule
54

Her husband doesn't seem to be all that. Why should she be thrilled that he was open about proposing? What better deal is that checkered-suit weird haircut loser gonna get.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
55

I assumed he was rich. Also, you should never, ever give a wedding toast.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 2:48 PM
horizontal rule
56

54: I'm assuming the picture from that article was bad, because she's written before about how attractive he is.

He is conventionally desirable and I am a "before" picture in an ad for weight-loss tapeworm eggs.


Posted by: LizSpigot | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 3:17 PM
horizontal rule
57

||

I'm going to a wedding this weekend for Tim's best man. The town/city is kind of far from a major urban area. Tim is in the wedding party and had to rent a tuxedo, because they are supposed to look identical. He would have bought a new white shirt of his own if he'd known that they wouldn't let him wear his tuxedo shirt. A new white shirt woudl cost him about $50. He's renting a crappy white shirt for $20. The tuxedo rental is costing him $200 USD. (I'm shuddering at what that is in Canadian dollars.) Around here, you can rent one for $50. You can buy a crappy one for $$200.

|>


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
58

I assumed he was rich

He's a musician you haven't heard of. Therefore, not rich.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:01 PM
horizontal rule
59

Worthwhile Canadian Formalware.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:01 PM
horizontal rule
60

Anyway, I have a $200 tuxedo.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:15 PM
horizontal rule
61

I never thought of it as crappy until now.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
62

61: Okay, where I am, without a shirt, tuxedos start at $189. Tim had one that was baggy and didn't fit well. It was uncomfortable. In other words, it was crappy for him.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:35 PM
horizontal rule
63

My horror of rented clothing may be disproportionate. But I don't think so. *shudder*


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:39 PM
horizontal rule
64

I suppose I should adjust for inflation as I bought it a dozen years ago.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:44 PM
horizontal rule
65

The lapels are shinier than any fancy $300 tux.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 6:57 PM
horizontal rule
66

Having to hire special clothes to attend a wedding so you all look identical is wrong. You're an honoured guest, not a film extra. And at least film extras get paid and don't have to supply their own costumes.
So is wearing a tuxedo at a wedding, for that matter. Morning suit or equivalent for weddings. Dinner jackets are for dinners.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-22-15 11:56 PM
horizontal rule
67

Morning suit or equivalent for weddings. Dinner jackets are for dinners.

This, 100 times. Unless they're getting married in the evening.

Which said, I got married in a lounge suit which had cost me £10 three years before. Because we'd already been living together for 15 years and we had better things to do with our money.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 2:20 AM
horizontal rule
68

But in those days £10 was the annual income of a landed knight, though.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 2:42 AM
horizontal rule
69

Pretty much. It was a nice suit, though, charcoal three piece, pin striped. Being short and fat, there was a period when I could dress very well out of Oxfam, as people were donating their rich (fat) granddad's (short by present day standards) stuff. No longer, alas. They may still offload rich granddad's wardrobe, but he was too tall and money could no longer buy quality.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 2:56 AM
horizontal rule
70

I didn't wear a suit at all to my wedding. It's probably why we got divorced.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 3:22 AM
horizontal rule
71

Any American who owns a morning suit and can wear it without looking like a film extra is a deputy undersecretary of state.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 4:02 AM
horizontal rule
72

Yeah, morning suits don't really exist in the US.

Also, men look better in tuxedos/dinner jackets than they do in morning suits. Proven fact.


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 4:13 AM
horizontal rule
73

Also, except for people who read period fiction and look up confusing things on Wikipedia, nobody knows that a business suit used to be a lounge suit.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 4:32 AM
horizontal rule
74

Also, we eat fire and the u's from "our"s.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 4:46 AM
horizontal rule
75

And at least film extras get paid and don't have to supply their own costumes.

These statements are both false.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 4:47 AM
horizontal rule
76

75: not always. Friends of mine have worked as extras and were paid for doing so. Nor did they have to provide their own futuristic stormtrooper armour.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 4:50 AM
horizontal rule
77

I was paid the time I was a movie extra! Wore my own street clothes, tho.

I've never understood why not just wear nice clothes in weddings rather than rented costumes.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:19 AM
horizontal rule
78

I'd bet that a considerably plurality if not an outright majority of the people in the most-marrying age cohorts don't own "nice clothes" in the sense of formal clothing.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:21 AM
horizontal rule
79

I've never understood why not just wear nice clothes in weddings rather than rented costumes.

Historical drift. Wearing some version of formal dress to a party used to be a lot commoner than it is now, so formal dress for weddings wasn't out of step with any other big-deal party. That changed: morning suits are, as Moby said, only for cartoon diplomats, and even formal evening wear for men is pretty archaic in any non-wedding context. Not that there are no white/black tie occasions other than weddings, but very, very few to the point where most men probably don't go to any. Dress for the wedding party fossilized, though, because that gets preplanned rather than just being what seems appropriate when the guest is getting dressed.

There'll probably be a break point when people give up on white/black tie entirely, and even wedding parties will reset to "Whatever you'd wear to a fancy party otherwise."


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:26 AM
horizontal rule
80

Having to hire special clothes to attend a wedding so you all look identical is wrong. You're an honoured guest, not a film extra. And at least film extras get paid and don't have to supply their own costumes.
So is wearing a tuxedo at a wedding, for that matter. Morning suit or equivalent for weddings. Dinner jackets are for dinners.

I don't know what a "morning suit" or "dinner jacket" is. Anyway, do you have bridesmaids over there in the UK who have to wear special stupid dresses? We certainly can't get rid of THAT tradition. So to even things out, the tuxedos are just for the equivalent members of the groom's party.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
81

I'm pretty sure HBOs Rome used reenactors who brought their own kit. It's not unusual for reenactors to have better gear than the props department.

Googling around a bit I found a Roman reenactment group just down the street from me. I think I might have to go to one of their events. It sounds like a fucking blast.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
82

Think cartoonish images of oldfashioned rich people. Morning suit is a jacket with tails -- it can match the pants in grey or black, or can be a darker jacket over grey or striped pants. Ordinary tie rather than a bow-tie.

Dinner jacket is UK for tuxedo.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:31 AM
horizontal rule
83

As I learned back in Nebraska (from reading Class), "dinner jacket" is (or was) current lingo among the upper crust in the U.S.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:34 AM
horizontal rule
84

Every wedding I attended, including my own, in the mid-seventies to mid-eighties was not formal at all. Grooms wore suits, some brides did wear wedding dresses but seldom touching the floor, let alone with a train. No bridesmaids outfits/coordination.

We honestly thought all that was gone for good.


Posted by: idp | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:38 AM
horizontal rule
85

I've seen the suits from then. I'm sort of glad those didn't stick.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:39 AM
horizontal rule
86

I was part of a wedding party recently and was mildly annoyed by the request that all the groomsmen wear black suits (matching ties to be provided). At the time, I owned a dark blue suit and a dark grey suit, neither of which, I was informed, would suffice. So now I also own a black suit, which, sure, I can use, but it always makes me feel vaguely like I'm (a) heading to a funeral, or (b) filming a sequel for Reservoir Dogs.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:42 AM
horizontal rule
87

On the other hand, going to a funeral will probably come up in the future sometime, and you'll have the suit for it.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
88

You could always join a Blues Brothers cover band.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
89

Mine, admittedly from the end of the period, '84, still looks quite normal today. My son wore it to his prom.

Had it been from '75 it would be a period costume indeed. Although it would equip me to be a paid seventies re-enacting extra.


Posted by: idp | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:44 AM
horizontal rule
90

It's not like I don't know roughly the historical reasons and social pressures that lead people to wear the odd things they do but the societal wide failure of both taste and imagination is still on some level puzzling to me. Acquiring an attractive and flattering outfit to wear to festivities is probably one of the few reasons I can understand for having a wedding.

Also dudes have a comically unending list of bits and bobs - shirt, cufflinks, trousers, jacket, waistcoat, tie, pocket square, shoes ... when you are kitting out a rapidly growing 14 year old it sort of goes on and on. Women so much easier - dress, shoes.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:44 AM
horizontal rule
91

I always though the dudes were easier. For on thing, you can wear the same pair of shoes with everything. For another thing, cufflinks, waistcoats, and pocket squares are all very much optional.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:48 AM
horizontal rule
92

rapidly growing 14 year old

We solve this by clothing Newt mostly in stained rags, but yeah, he's having a year when it's hard to keep clothes on him that even approximate his height. I keep on thinking "Can't you just wear shorts for a couple of years until you stabilize?"


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:52 AM
horizontal rule
93

money could no longer buy quality

What is the world coming to?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:53 AM
horizontal rule
94

I don't know whether to be amused or horrified that dairy queen's standards of dress for a fourteen-year-old include cufflinks and pocket squares. First of all, a fourteen-year-old in French cuffs is inherently comical; second, those things are decorations, and by those standards the counterpart fourteen-year-old girl needs a bracelet, necklace, hat, some kind of shawl or scarf or wrap or whatchamacallum and probably more.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:57 AM
horizontal rule
95

Luckily my kid seems blissfully unaware of the concept of "floods" - he just claps on a brightly colored pair of socks and off he goes. I thought things would be easier once he was in mens' sizes, as you can get unhemmed trousers, but small enough around is still hard to find.

He's one of the brothers of the bride, Moby, so sufficiently resplendent is called for.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:58 AM
horizontal rule
96

Luckily my kid seems blissfully unaware of the concept of "floods"

Of course not, he's from California.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
97

Unless he's got a whole bunch of sisters, that's just a one shot deal. Maybe you should rent something?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 8:00 AM
horizontal rule
98

He was 9 or 10 when she graduated from undergrad and definitely wore cufflinks for that.

He'll never outgrow the tie, cufflinks or pocket square so those are by definition not one off investments. The jacket has some room in the shoulders, I'm guessing he won't fill out enough to really outgrow it for 4 - 5 years, but got it and the waistcoat on a great sale. Trousers can be let down and gets lots of use from all his shirts, so not worried about anything really but the shoes. Got those on sale as well, but if he gets self conscious about the relatively light color they may not get much use after the wedding.

As far as I can see this all just proves my point - wear nice clothes of your own, have a good time and go to lots of parties so you get value from them.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 8:09 AM
horizontal rule
99

My high school algebra teacher never outgrew or stopped wearing any of his ties from 1973.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 8:18 AM
horizontal rule
100

He was 9 or 10 when she graduated from undergrad and definitely wore cufflinks for that.

Comical!


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 8:19 AM
horizontal rule
101

And a straw pork pie hat!


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 8:25 AM
horizontal rule
102

I guess it's different if you were actually trying to be comical.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 8:37 AM
horizontal rule
103

If you go the website of the ace in portland and look around you can see a picture of him in his graduation attending finery. Maybe he was younger than 9? Can't remember and damn he is so small in that photo!

That photographer was by far the most polite and nice of all the bazillions of people that took pictures of him over the years.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
104

I own a now somewhat ill-fitting tux which sees action maybe once every 7 years, and I guess one pair of cufflinks that I got as a gift from being in someone else's wedding. I don't think I've ever worn a pocket square. The tux/dinner jacket thing for even very formal occasions seems to be fading if not extinct, except for weddings that you're actually "in."


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
105

I have multiple sets of cufflinks, but no French cuff shirts.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
106

The tux/dinner jacket thing for even very formal occasions seems to be fading if not extinct

where were you when I decided to buy a new tux for my own wedding (while in possession of a perfectly decent hand me down from my old man)? That was mumble hundred dollars I would have preferred to spend on not having a job. And I have not had the opportunity to wear it but one time since.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
107

to be fair, I did have an average of two occasions a year before that. Something to do with the wedding season of my life, and having a somewhat public job with the occasional formal event.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
108

at least I have occasion to whine about my tuxedo once every nine months.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 10:57 AM
horizontal rule
109

French cuffs and cufflinks seem to be in style around here for formal business wear, but a pocket square is unusual. I think the business casual trend pushes slightly in favor of getting fancier when you do put on a suit, though -- it feels more like dressing up.

At weddings you see a lot of "black tie optional." Older male guests sometimes respond to this with a tuxedo, but more often by wearing the same grey or blue suit they'd wear to a business meeting. Younger ones, almost always the latter.

I do myself own an old tuxedo, not particularly expensive, that I wore maybe once or twice and that doesn't currently fit, but that I've never had the heart to get rid of.


Posted by: widget | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 11:08 AM
horizontal rule
110

One odd thing about Hollywood is that no one wears suits for meetings -- lawyers, business managers, and executives included -- except agents, who always wear ultra-fashionable suits, often these days as Widget says french-cuffed with cufflinks, except for the very top tier of agents, who don't wear suits. I now feel like most of my suit wearing is the equivalent of putting on a barrister's wig to go to Court, and it's kind of become costume-dress for agents. Although for some stodgier non-Hollywood clients I'll still wear a suit. Oddly when we represent agents we'll go to meetings where the lawyers aren't wearing suits but the agents are.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 11:22 AM
horizontal rule
111

One of the rules for Hollywood writers is to always be the worst-dressed in the room. The executive you're meeting with is snappy business casual. If you write drama, you're business casual, if you write comedy, casual casual.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
112

I am disappointed in nosflow. I wear a French cuffed shirt pretty much every day. Mind you, I have almost never worn a morning suit. Kilt will substitute, as it will for so many things.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
113

Hey! I wore a morning suit to my wedding!

(I already owned a tuxedo, but as noted, the wedding wasn't in the evening.)


Posted by: Nathan Williams | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
114

112 -- do you wear the kilt to weddings actually in Scotland? Or is it a kind of national dress that's fun to wear as a symbol of pride in England, like Nigerians who wear dashikis to formal events?


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
115

Of course the dashiki is actually worn for real in a way the kilt isn't, so that was probably a lame analogy. But you know what I mean, maybe.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:09 PM
horizontal rule
116

112: even when participating in military exercises?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:11 PM
horizontal rule
117

A Scottish friend got married in a kilt in New Jersey a year or two ago, which was picturesque, and the Scottish members of the wedding party, as well as his father, were in kilts as well (not matching rentals). So if that's normal, I'd assume that people who own kilts do show up to weddings in them.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:14 PM
horizontal rule
118

Kilts are perfectly acceptable formal wear for Scots. With hand knit kilt hose I trust, ajay.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
119

I also still do not own a cummerbund. Slol and ajay can despise me in their formal duds.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:36 PM
horizontal rule
120

Is two people meeting to despise a third, as entertaining as it might be, really an occasion that demands formal dress?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
121

Also, there's no need to own a cummerbund, so long as you have sufficient formal waistcoats. So free your mind of that concern.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:40 PM
horizontal rule
122

A waistcoat is really just an unusually large pocket square.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:41 PM
horizontal rule
123

Ordinary tie rather than a bow-tie

That's no tie, it's a cravat! And a waistcoat (or what we foreigners call a vest).


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
124

I must claim 123.


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
125

Hey! I wore a morning suit to my wedding!

And you looked lovely! I think that's the first time I've seen an American male in the US in one (granted, it's not like I socialised with many people actually likely to wear one before I moved).

I've told my story about being invited to a DJ party, right? I assumed they meant there was a famous DJ. How wrong I was. Dinner jackets required. We barely socialise and yet I think we've attended one DJ-required event each year I've been here. Wedding-wise, since we got married at the registry office, he just wore a gorgeous regular suit, which is now in his work rotation.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
126

Also me. I don't know what keeps happening to my name.


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
127

Sometimes people lose their name when they get married.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
128

120: when I am the third, yes.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
129

I also rented a morning suit for my wedding, because my own tails would have been inappropriate before 6:00.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 07-23-15 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
130

do you wear the kilt to weddings actually in Scotland? Or is it a kind of national dress that's fun to wear as a symbol of pride in England, like Nigerians who wear dashikis to formal events?

I have only been to one wedding where I didn't wear a kilt - and that was because the groom had hired matching morning suits for everyone, which was slightly annoying but at least we didn't have to pay for the hire. At my brother's wedding there was only one pair of trousers in the entire congregation. (They had an Indian guy inside them. They weren't just sitting there on the pew by themselves because someone had inadvertently turned up not in a kilt and immediately evaporated out of shame.)

I had to look up "dashiki" but now I know what it is and it looks rather smart. Draughty, though, for our bitter northern climate.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-24-15 2:08 AM
horizontal rule
131

Draughty, though, for our bitter northern climate.

And the kilt is not? Doesn't anybody wear dress trews any more?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07-24-15 2:51 AM
horizontal rule
132

The kilt is actually surprisingly warm. When you're wearing kilt plus hose, really only your knees are exposed to the cold; the kilt is heavy material and traps the warm air around your legs. Trews are in practice less suitable for a bitter and boggy northern climate, because they get wet when you wade through something and don't dry quickly. Hose will also get wet, but is right next to the skin and so dries faster. (You still see Scottish climbers wearing breeches plus long woolen socks, rather than trousers, for this reason.)
The only advantage of trews is that you can ride a horse in them.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-24-15 3:02 AM
horizontal rule
133

The Virginia Governor is (still) traditionally sworn in wearing a morning suit:

Before taking the oath, McAuliffe, wearing a formal gray morning suit with a white rose on the lapel and accompanied by his wife, Dorothy, made his way around the Capitol rotunda, greeting legislators by name.

So, the list of people who wear morning suits: NW, non-kilted inhabitants of the UK, and Terry McAuliffe.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-24-15 6:19 AM
horizontal rule
134

How do you get trews on the horse?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-24-15 6:21 AM
horizontal rule
135

You're looking at the problem wrong. You should be asking "how do you make the horse want to put trews on?"


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-24-15 6:38 AM
horizontal rule