Re: Freedom!

1

Tom Friedman actually had a surprisingly good column about this sort of thing last week. I don't ordinarily read Friedman, but the rabbi at my mom's synagogue mentioned it in his sermon on Friday night, which was sort of a follow-up to his discussion of the current climate of Islamophobia in his sermon on Yom Kippur. My mom and I both have some issues with this rabbi, but he's been quite good and vocal on this particular issue, which isn't always the case with rabbis.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:08 AM
horizontal rule
2

Not even a thread about Muslims can avoid being taken over.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
3

Kidding. Happy Sukkot.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
4

Thanks.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
5

What could go wrong?

Somebody might get shot.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
6

Or somebody might get stabbed by somebody who takes a broad reading of the Second Amendment.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:19 AM
horizontal rule
7

Or something might get set on fire or even blown up.

I'm surprised Trump hasn't gotten in on a lot of this muslim hatred stuff. If he keeps focusing exclusively on (those particular you know the ones) immigrants he's going to get left behind.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:23 AM
horizontal rule
8

National hero "Dude you have no Quran" guy needs to come out of retirement. Apparently he also refers to himself as the "Cadillac of men" which makes him even more of an American hero.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:23 AM
horizontal rule
9

I'm surprised Trump hasn't gotten in on a lot of this muslim hatred stuff.

I wonder how much money he's taken from Saudi interests in his various deals. It's got to be in at least the hundreds of millions. I assume that the anti-Mexican stuff is fine with him financially because as a big player he's into cutting deals with corrupt wings of the various building trades unions, who hate the immigrant competition.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 11:32 AM
horizontal rule
10

I feel like the entire world has been on a downward trend and then abruptly started getting much worse much faster in the past few months - sort of a runaway climate change for interpersonal stuff.

Between this nonsense and that Peeple app, I just cannot with humanity anymore.

There's this really rather weak and sentimental James Tiptree short story where this kid grows up thinking that he's an alien from a Star Trek-like band of interstellar explorers and of course this completely fucks up his life - but then, just as he's about to die in some awful dystopian near-future war, he is rescued by the aliens and it turns out that he was right all along. Lately, discovering that benign aliens are going to rescue me has pretty much turned into my life plan.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
11

Spoiler alert!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
12

I think "you're a wizard" is better than "you're an alien." Because then all your prior sexual fantasies aren't bestiality.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 12:53 PM
horizontal rule
13

Unless you're Slytherin.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
14

12: Clearly you have not looked at nearly as much internet porn as you pretend. Consider all those people who buy the held-captive-by-bigfoot-and-or-Clippy kinds of erotic novels - discovering that they're all wizards won't help.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:00 PM
horizontal rule
15

Don't mark me down too much in Peeple for the error.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
16

12 Moby puts on his robe and wizard hat.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:27 PM
horizontal rule
17

10: I found that story completely heartbreaking as an angsty teenager. Sure, the world sucks completely, and everyone wants to be rescued by people from enlightened topless Star Trek. No, it's not actually going to happen to you either.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:38 PM
horizontal rule
18

17. It's the SF version of "you aren't my REAL parents."


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
19

FANS ARE SLANS!


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
20

17: It is!!!! Don't crush my last remaining dream, LB.

James Tiptree stories have always produced in me a combination of "geez, this is so sentimental and overblown, and the pseudo-cynical voice doesn't help either" and hysterical weeping. The thing about "Beam Us Home", I guess, is that unlike most of her stories (which are almost all basically "I don't fit in anywhere, I am going to be miserable, experience false hope and then die") is that it has an actual happy ending, sort of.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
21

Which makes it worse, somehow. She didn't even gesture at plausibility -- just, yeah, they saved him from dying simultaneously of dysentery and crashing his fighter plane. That's what he was dreaming about. And that's exactly what will never, never, never happen.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
22

21: Alien abduction is a fantasy by which we measure our pain.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
23

It cancels out mouse orgasms in equal measure.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
24

10 sounds like some kind of ironic play on "The Little Match Girl" with a way too positive ending for any Racoona I remember. My guess is that she intended you to be embarrassed about wanting a happy alien ex machina but with no way of directly writing it. Or something.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:04 PM
horizontal rule
25

I don't know if it's really worse, because I tend - as an adult - to read most of Tiptree's work as saying "my situation [because it's always obviously about her own personal pain and feeling of alienation] is so terrible that I can't even envision even the most wildly implausible happy ending". Like, the one where the woman has the deformed face - Tiptree can imagine a world of all kinds of aliens and space whatever, but happiness is just outside the glass and forever inaccessible.

To analogize - but about books, so it's allowed, right? - if you read a whole bunch of those Anne Perry novels, eventually she starts doling out just keeeerazy happy endings to various characters whose backstory is just average-to-grim - the older widowed mother takes up with a handsome significantly younger actor and there's no life destroying scandal and he really loves her, etc. It's totally out of character as she was written earlier, but I remember reading that one years ago and feeling like hey, the actual world is terrible, so if you happen to have a fantasy world that you control and you're inventing all these lurid Victorian sex scandal murders, why not dish out the happy endings?

Perry is like the opposite of Tiptree, and there's the interesting fact that both of them murdered someone.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:05 PM
horizontal rule
26

24: If anything, I find Tiptree's grimdark-before-the-fact a bit embarrassing. I've taught a couple of her stories and the kids today think they're virtually camp in their depressingness. She's fascinating and important and I like her work, but when you put her beside someone like Joanna Russ, who can also be OTT sentimental, you really see that Tiptree is always, again and again, turning toward her own personal pain and away from the political. The political is always, always recaptured by personal trauma in Tiptree.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
27

17,18: Asenath aka Domineditrix bought into that. Her real Martian parents were supposed to pick her up at age X (I don't remember X) and she was very disappointed when it didn't happen.


Posted by: Biohazard | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
28

||

A group on campus is being jerks to me, really inflexible in a schedule conflict for which I have 6 years of precedent. I lost the battle.

Then I was able to be sneaky and determine that there will probably be a conflict for the next four years, at least through 2020, and so I was able to make reservations for the next four years. They won't discover my deviousness until this summer, when the next conflict officially comes to light.

YAY!

|>


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
29

In other words, my dates are pre-determined indefinitely, but theirs are not. I have reason to believe there will be a conflict, but they can't justify booking this far out.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
30

Maybe. Tiptree wassmarter than fuck, and had more experience than ten people, an I grant the possibility that the world really is that bad. Tiptree had tons of contempt for her audience.

"Beam Me up" as "Little Match Girl" makes perfect sense, and the contempt we have for Anderson's "happy ending" was probably meant to be reflected in the sometimes despairing view I have of a culture that consumes impossible science fiction fantasies by the boatload yet despises religion and the supernatural.

And We Who Are About To is the honest Russ.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
31

28: Have you retaliated by going to the peeple site and giving them all low ratings?


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
32

17: that's what happens to the main character in Use of Weapons... gets saved from death and offered a job with Special Circumstances. Jumps at it of course. Well, you would.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:27 PM
horizontal rule
33

Facilities logistics is a dish best served cold.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
34

Ah me. Straw Nihilist at tvtropes made me laugh at myself today.

But the accelerating public craving for superheroes, space operas, and time travel as we rush headlong toward species extinction should be as terrifying as group flagellants in time of plague.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
35

30: Tiptree was - perhaps - "smarter than fuck". She was also capable of great self-delusion, as when she murdered her disabled husband and falsely claimed that this was because his quality of life was so poor, and I feel like that was very much of a piece with her life - a reading of her own personal pain onto the world that was so total that she could not admit the existence of any other narrative. Any story which is meant to choke you up and say "yeah, that's the way it is, man, you just can't win because people are terrible" has something wrong with it, e.g. "We Who Stole The Dream".

I mean, she's writing an earlier kind of science fiction, the kind where the short story is supposed to end with a thump, and I think that was part of what made her work seem so campy to my class.

We Who Are About To... is honest Russ? What, pray, is the dishonest Russ? Russ's actual, material commitments to socialism, feminism and lesbian liberation were just as "honest" even if less grim, than the worldview in We Who Are About To..... We Who Are About To.... is depressive Russ, just like "The Little Dirty Girl" and "Mr. Wilde's Second Chance" and "The Mystery of the Young Gentleman" are happy Russ.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
36

Ah me. Straw Nihilist at tvtropes made me laugh at myself today.

But the accelerating public craving for superheroes, space operas, and time travel as we rush headlong toward species extinction should be as terrifying as group flagellants in time of plague.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:34 PM
horizontal rule
37

Perry is like the opposite of Tiptree, and there's the interesting fact that both of them murdered someone.

Hold up what?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:36 PM
horizontal rule
38

37: Spoiler alert! Don't look behind your drapes when you come home.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:41 PM
horizontal rule
39

I tend - as an adult - to read most of Tiptree's work as saying "my situation [because it's always obviously about her own personal pain and feeling of alienation] is so terrible that I can't even envision even the most wildly implausible happy ending".

[delete delete]

Uh, do you want an argument? You sound like nothing's going to shake these foundations for you, and it's 99% certainly not worth my time to try.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:42 PM
horizontal rule
40

37: Well, not the same someone.

Anne Perry was born Juliet Marion Hulme and was one of the two girls in the murder case dramatized as Heavenly Creatures. This came out in the 2000s, if I recall correctly.

Tiptree shot her husband and then herself. She alleged that this was a mercy killing because of his health, but actually all he had - IIRC - was deteriorating vision and general old age problems. The feminist science fiction community doesn't like to talk about it, which drives me up the wall. It was an able-ist murder that people put aside because she was so feminist and, well, she was depressed, so it must have been unavoidable. Contract with how that douchecanoe Hugo Schwyer's murder/suicide attempt gets discussed - and while HS is obviously a much worse person, there's still a lot of hypocrisy in how people talk about Tiptree. (The racism in her work and her own equivocal relation to colonialism tend to get papered over as well, because feminism.) Again, I like her work, and when I run classes in foundational feminist SF, we read her stuff. I don't think she was a terrible person, but I think we steer away from a lot of complex conversations about her and her work.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
41

I'd like to take a firm stand against murdering husbands while they sleep.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:46 PM
horizontal rule
42

39: A little of A, a little of B? I've read a lot of Tiptree and critical material about her a lot of times at this point, and I think I'm not going to suffer a sea change in my reading of her....but perhaps it's like how I feel about my old-hippie pagan friend who sees spirits, where I feel that parallel, incompatible views can, like, both exist and both be interesting.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:47 PM
horizontal rule
43

Should go dig the Tiptree collections pout of the box, but the description of "Beam Me Up," besides "Little Match Girl" also reminded for some reason of Robert Lindner's Fifty Minute Hour and Saint-Exupery.

Science Fiction is pathological.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:49 PM
horizontal rule
44

Do you also write fiction, or just read/teach it? Pure curiosity, no judgment, etc.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:50 PM
horizontal rule
45

44: That doesn't come across as "no judgment".

I've written some deeply mediocre fiction that lurks on the depths of various hard drives, but that's about it. Could I write anything that even approximates the very least Tiptree story off her weakest anthology? Probably not.

I dunno - she's like a more skillful Sherry Tepper; there's just something really....I can't even find the word, something like ressentiment but directed at the whole world...in her work.



Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 2:56 PM
horizontal rule
46

Let's all list how many novels we've written.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
47

Because I think 5 sort of covers the OP.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
48

Wikipedia describes her husband as "a nearly blind invalid."


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
49

"I can't even find the word,something like ressentiment but directed at the whole world...in her work."

Misanthropy? Could Dr Ain provide a clue?

I have always liked that in a writer



Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:03 PM
horizontal rule
50

48: I am not home so I don't have the book to hand, but I'm pretty sure that the big Tiptree biography goes into all this in detail. I remember because I'd always heard the "well, he was very, very sick and so it was understandable" line from people about the whole thing and then I was extremely surprised and upset to learn that it was a much more equivocal situation.

Again, I'm sure this was about her depression, her isolation, her conflicted feelings about her sexuality and marriage, and I feel both sympathy and horror when I think about it. But I've also had a LOT of conversations with feminist SF fans who either minimize the whole thing or who are immediately shocked and horrified when they hear about it. When we read some Tiptree in the last iteration of my eternal feminist SF community ed project, I really, really had to do some fancy explaining to keep the class from thinking of Tiptree as an unacceptable person who should be expelled from the feminist canon.

I feel like I'm always in this really weird situation - when I'm around feminists who are SF fans (as opposed to fans specifically of 2nd wave feminist SF) I'm always cast in this sort of bad-guy role, where I'm explaining that The Female Man isn't really transphobic in the way that it seems to be, and that there's mitigating circumstances for the apparent Islamophobia in The Two of Them, and that Tiptree's ideas about colonialism are not as white-savior as they sound, etc. And then when I'm around fans of 2nd wave feminist SF I'm always the bad reader who just doesn't understand how wonderful and ur-feminist these writers are.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:10 PM
horizontal rule
51

Ah, sorry. The "also" was ambiguous: I meant "do you write in addition to reading and teaching?" I generally agree with your assessment of Tiptree, which is why I was already 99% disinclined to quibble about it when I asked. I think we can both agree on the claim that this exchange has been a waste of time, however.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
52

I mean, my end of it, not yours. You have been informative and gracious.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:12 PM
horizontal rule
53

We might add to Henley's rule of buts that the use of "just" in the sense of "only" typically reads as "merely" and sounds judgmental.

Frowner's description of Tiptree has me thinking I might find her writing congenial.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:16 PM
horizontal rule
54

I generally agree with your assessment of Tiptree, which is why I was already 99% disinclined to quibble about it when I asked.

Well, that's confusing.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:20 PM
horizontal rule
55

What is the other reading of the "also" there, btw? It didn't seem ambiguous to me.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:20 PM
horizontal rule
56

Oh, I guess it's what ogged mentioned in 53.1.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
57

Or "do you, like me, write fiction".


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
58

Also, like Tiptree did.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
59

52: Yes indeed, I am always gracious! Well, thank you for interpreting my comments as gracious rather than bitey, anyway.

Now, of course, I'm thinking about all the stuff I do like in her work - I really like the messenger/mad girl's dialogue in "Your Faces O My Sisters", and I like all of "A Momentary Taste of Being" even though its dystopian future has so many right-wing tropes. And "Love Is the Plan The Plan Is Death" is so good. And I love the slow spaceships in "Houston, Houston, Do You Read", and the ways the clones talk about their relationships, and the books for each of the kinds of clone. And I've often thought about "The Only Neat Thing To Do" when I've had to nerve myself up to do something that's difficult but right.

I first read both Her Smoke Rose Up Forever and Tanith Lee's Dreams of Dark and Light in the unexpectedly nice BOMC editions which I got at the library back when I was eleven, and they get a bit muddled in my head. It's funny, Tanith Lee - whose reputation is so much the lesser and whose work is known for being all louche - is just such an emotionally healthier writer. I remember very clearly reading "The Girl Who Was Plugged In" and knowing so clearly that I too, like P.Burke, was a disgusting decaying cowlike living corpse, and the best that I could possibly hope for was to get a chance to hide this fact for a bit. The ambiguity about adult female bodies in Tiptree is really weird* - in theory, of course, one is supposed to sympathize with P Burke and understand the social critique in the story, but the obsessively loathing detail of the descriptions of poor P.Burke's body seem to me to undercut the critique.

*Actually, there were a couple of rather odd things quoted in her bio which made me wonder if she - given the social space - might not actually have identified as a trans man. I'm not attached to some kind of "Tiptree was really trans" silliness; it's just that there were several points where she actually said things about feeling like a man, etc. I know it was a different time and many smart women said stuff like that, but they were quite odd remarks.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:27 PM
horizontal rule
60

I would recommend early Tanith Lee.

Tiptree was pretty literary at times (I have never completely gotten "Love is the Plan") and I think she wrote to/playing with her audience (the late 60s Nebula crowd) and too pessimistic to be any kind of committed feminist. I view her largely as a decadent, Huysman, Djuna Barnes?


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:44 PM
horizontal rule
61

"Are you also a writer, like Tiptree, or are you just a talentless scold who likes to tear down greater minds in the classroom?" I assume that was the disparaging reading.

To 54: okay FFS: I DO think that much of Tiptree's work is problematic, that she is focused on her own pain, and that murdering people is not okay, BUT I have zero dogs in the feminist SF fight and I think the account Frowner gave (at the time of the comment) was reductive, given the heterogeneity of the stories. I would also cede a greater role to "performativity" -- the camp thing, the pseuds -- and I'd say something like: she gambles on her own empathy with other human beings -- that imaginative empathy never "feels" like something reliable -- in her writing. It works a lot more often than most gambling does, though.

"Emotionally healthier than Tiptree" is a bar most people can clear. Possibly even Djuna Barnes, depending on the year (that's not a bad comparison, though I'm not sure I'd fly the decadence flag over it -- hard to choose).


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 3:51 PM
horizontal rule
62

To the OP, wasn't there some story recently about some white dude who was planning to blow up and/or shoot up some mosque and was let free on some ridiculously low amount of bail?

I'd say it was only a matter of time but it's already happened, what with those 3 kids in North Carolina, or that Sikh temple a few years back, and probably a bunch of other stuff I'm forgetting about.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 7:41 PM
horizontal rule
63

25.2, 40.2: Not that I've read Anne Perry since the latter half of the '90s, when all that came out, but Teen Me was fascinated and sickened both by what I remember as asides about how of course murder is always wrong and how of seemed like if you could figure out early on who in the story was queer, you had your murderer. I'm sure I was being unfair but I'd read two or three of her novels (in hopes of gay content) before the disclosure and was creeped out by those and only managed another one I think after.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 7:55 PM
horizontal rule
64

murder is always wrong

You should at least wake up your husband and let him compose himself.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 8:42 PM
horizontal rule
65

Her Smoke Rose Up Forever

I'm really enjoying playing with all of the ways these words can take on different meanings/parts of speech, especially the one in which a (forgive me) rastaman is explaining that she gets high on roses until the end of time.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 8:49 PM
horizontal rule
66

I DO think that [...] murdering people is not okay

Yeah sure whatever.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 8:50 PM
horizontal rule
67

I had Anne Perry confused with the dragon-rider book lady.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09-30-15 8:52 PM
horizontal rule
68

You should at least wake up your husband and let him compose himself.

For myself, if my wife was going to murder me I would rather she did it in my sleep and I knew nothing about it. But each to their own.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 1:34 AM
horizontal rule
69

List of novelists who have killed people!

Anne Perry and James Tiptree, obviously. Cervantes as well, pretty sure. Pushkin fought a lot of duels - did he kill anyone? Robert Graves and Siegfried Sassoon? I can't remember "Goodbye To All That" clearly enough.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 2:32 AM
horizontal rule
70

Well, if suicide counts...

...but the more interesting one is war. Mailer, Jones, maybe Heller whoever...interesting that we don't think of this as "killing people."

I certainly did, one of my first thoughts in the thread was how many deaths Tiptree was partially responsible for in WWII and CIA.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 2:38 AM
horizontal rule
71

Lermontov, maybe? He certainly died in a duel, and apparently fought bravely against the Chechens.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 2:42 AM
horizontal rule
72

70: Wasn't Norman Mailer actually an army cook? Not sure if he would have killed anyone (unless he forgot to wash his hands). Heller definitely, as a bombardier. Jones maybe.

interesting that we don't think of this as "killing people."

Er, I did bob, that's why I listed Graves, Sassoon and Cervantes.

Oh, and William Burroughs.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 3:18 AM
horizontal rule
73

Yes, Lermontov is probably a safe bet.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 3:21 AM
horizontal rule
74

Tolstoy served in the Crimea, but I'm not sure in what capacity.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 4:24 AM
horizontal rule
75

Saddam Hussein wrote a novel.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 4:58 AM
horizontal rule
76

Let's not forget that monster Hemingway.


Posted by: Opinionated Shark | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 4:59 AM
horizontal rule
77

Saddam Hussein wrote a novel.

Did he ever actually kill anybody, rather than ordering people killed?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:03 AM
horizontal rule
78

I recall reading that he was part of a team carrying out an assassination. I don't remember if he killed anybody but he was shooting. And I think got shot.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:09 AM
horizontal rule
79

It's possible I read that in Cracked. It's not in the primary sources I checked (i.e. Wikipedia doesn't mention it).


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:17 AM
horizontal rule
80

Goebbels wrote at least one novel, and according to some versions, killed his wife before killing himself.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:19 AM
horizontal rule
81

Tolkien was a signals officer, Somme.

The guy who wrote signals officer also. Not sure about the author of Human Condition, but if the story is autobiographical, he barely saw combat (trenches against Russian tanks at the very end, just terror), but murdered a sentry escaping. Oh, and an asshole fellow prisoner at a POW camp.

Don't remember beginning ofHarp of Burma well, but I think not.

Osamu Dazai double-suicided


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:24 AM
horizontal rule
82

Guy who wrote Fires on the Plain was a signals officer in Philippines, html fail. Remembering more clearly I think he kills a peasant and a fellow soldier who was a cannibal.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:27 AM
horizontal rule
83

Hannah Arendt was tougher than I thought.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:43 AM
horizontal rule
84

78: yes, he got shot in the leg and wounded slightly by one of his own guys. Probably never killed anyone himself.

Osamu Dazai double-suicided

Impressive determination.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:49 AM
horizontal rule
85

Maybe he killed the guy who wounded him.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:52 AM
horizontal rule
86

Seems he killed one of his own security men in 2003, at least. No doubt others.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/12/22/1071941665229.html


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:55 AM
horizontal rule
87

Anyway, he probably made some guy write the book for him.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 5:56 AM
horizontal rule
88

Churchill's got to be near the top surely.


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 6:11 AM
horizontal rule
89

Isaac Babel?


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 6:16 AM
horizontal rule
90

I assume Agatha Christie offed somebody at least once for research purposes.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 6:19 AM
horizontal rule
91

I thought William Dean Howells had seen combat, but was wrong.

Major General Lew Wallace of course.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 6:33 AM
horizontal rule
92

I doubt Wallace, actually. Brigade commanders don't normally engage in actual combat, even in 1862. They command.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:03 AM
horizontal rule
93

He didn't even command, did he? I thought he just got lost.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
94

Primary sources say he did command. He wasn't lost the whole time, only the time when his troops would have been most useful.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:14 AM
horizontal rule
95

Storm of Steel records several killings by Ernst Jünger.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:22 AM
horizontal rule
96

Neal Ascherson? I don't suppose he qualifies as a novelist, though.


Posted by: Nworb Werdna | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
97

Wait, who did Neal Ascherson kill?

If you count Julius Ceasar as a famous author, he's got to win on the combined fame as author+numbers killed metric.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 12:06 PM
horizontal rule
98

Goddamn misspelling.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
99

Having looked at the primary sources, I also want an answer to 97.1.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
100

97.2: King David beats him out easily.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 12:26 PM
horizontal rule
101

Hitler wrote a fairly well known book as well...


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
102

Yeah, but he's not famous as an author in the same way that Caesar is.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
103

Maybe some day the Book of Psalms will be as widely read as The Gallic Wars.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
104

I'm not sure Caesar is famous as an author at all. His generally recognized accomplishments have more to do with crossing rivers and getting stabbed.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 6:53 PM
horizontal rule
105

And the slogan at the premature ejaculation clinic, "Veni, vidi, veni."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 6:59 PM
horizontal rule
106

Catching up on the thread, I'm curious how many books Richard Macinko has written at this point . . . 20.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:11 PM
horizontal rule
107

From that wikipedia entry, the section on "video game" is funny.

Marcinko has partnered with Bethesda Softworks to publish Rogue Warrior for the Xbox 360, PS3 and PC. Marcinko himself is the protagonist and is voiced by actor Mickey Rourke. In the game, Marcinko is sent on a classified mission into North Korea to disrupt an anti-ballistic missile program. Released in December 2009, the game was critically panned, with critics citing poor AI, excessive use of expletives, numerous bugs, poor graphics, a short single player mode and limited multiplayer mode. Since its release, Rogue Warrior has been listed as one of the worst video games of all time.

Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:13 PM
horizontal rule
108

I'm not sure Caesar is famous as an author at all.

Literally 2000 years of people studying Latin say that you're wrong.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:27 PM
horizontal rule
109

Or, I guess, 500 years. No idea if Caesar was widely read before the Renaissance, but he's been the core Latin intro text since then.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:31 PM
horizontal rule
110

In the words of the famous author, "See Spot run. Jane, look at Spot run."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:36 PM
horizontal rule
111

37: The house (well, stately home, really) where the Parkers lived in the Parker-Hulme case is now the Staff Club where I work. They do nice beer and you can sit in the garden.


Posted by: Keir | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 7:41 PM
horizontal rule
112

Gene Wolfe probably killed a few Koreans. Invented Pringles, too.


Posted by: foolishmortal | Link to this comment | 10- 1-15 9:48 PM
horizontal rule
113

wait, gene wolfe invented pringles, seriously? not just great literature but also dried-potato-slurry non-euclidian geometry spaces?
solzhenitsyn undoubtedly killed loads of people on the eastern front, and also seems likely to have presided over/not prevented some of the gang-raping women and girls to death when he was a captain; he wrote a poem about it in which the narrator is neutral about this form of revenge.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 12:12 AM
horizontal rule
114

He helped invent the machine that makes Pringles, apparently.

I'm also curious to know who Neal Ascherson killed. His career and lifestyle don't seem likely to have included much mortal combat. Did he run someone over or something?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 1:49 AM
horizontal rule
115

re: 114.last

A bit of Googling, he did his national service as a Marine Commando in Malaya.

"When you do what you are trained to do, this extraordinary experience of shooting at people and being shot at, it is a huge high when you are 18 years old. But afterwards it dawns on you. You remember the dead bodies and think: 'I'm responsible for that.' You reflect, rather self-consciously, why am I not considered worthy to vote in the British election [the age of franchise then was 21], but I'm not too young to take somebody's life?"

Which is a quote from:

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/apr/12/history.politics


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 4:02 AM
horizontal rule
116

So, at the sharp end, with guns, doing colonial dirty work.

My brother's Dad, funnily enough, was similarly in Malaya in the late 50s. I can't remember what unit he was in, but he certainly saw active service, on foot, in jungles.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 4:04 AM
horizontal rule
117

Or was it a rain forest?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 4:09 AM
horizontal rule
118

115: Ah, of course. Thanks.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 4:30 AM
horizontal rule
119

108/9: I'm not sure that "But literally everyone fluent in Latin knows that..." is going to go very far when it comes to establishing that something is well known.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 8:17 AM
horizontal rule
120

WTF. Anne Perry is the girl from Heavenly Creatures. That's . . ..wow.


Posted by: Ile | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 2:41 PM
horizontal rule
121

What I most remember about Caesar is the number of ablative absolutes concern striking camp.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 4:24 PM
horizontal rule
122

Camping is great.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 4:44 PM
horizontal rule
123

We could have an unfogged meet up that's a combination of hiking, limping, and Aguirre, the Wrath of God recreating.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10- 2-15 4:55 PM
horizontal rule
124

I thought we were restricted to homicidal novelists. If we're doing authors in general, why has nobody mentioned François Villon yet?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10- 3-15 5:23 AM
horizontal rule