Re: Guest Post - Moral Panic or Typo?

1

I always associated child marriage with Kansas because about a decade ago this guy from Nebraska went to Kansas to marry the 14-year-old girl he got pregnant and then acted all shocked when Nebraska arrested him on his return.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 6:23 AM
horizontal rule
2

Supporting link.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 6:24 AM
horizontal rule
3

1 What's the matter with Kansas?


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 6:32 AM
horizontal rule
4

I hope the ten-year-old groom was a typo, but the article says a judge approved the marriage and that judges don't need to approve marriages for those over fifteen. If I'm reading that correctly, there could still be a typo, but it doesn't seem likely that the typo is substituting a '2' for a '1'.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 6:33 AM
horizontal rule
5

True story: I had a roommate who married his former high school teacher.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 6:37 AM
horizontal rule
6

True story: my high school soccer coach just friended me on Facebook. Startlingly, we appear to be roughly the same age.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 6:58 AM
horizontal rule
7

I didn't even had a high school coach.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:01 AM
horizontal rule
8

I'm guessing lots of the 16 and 17yos marrying guys in their 20s in NJ are Chasidic. A judge wouldn't bat an eyelash at a pair of very religious people applying for a license, with no citizenship issues involved etc.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:02 AM
horizontal rule
9

Regardless of age, the judge shouldn't be making eyes at people who want to get married to other people.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:03 AM
horizontal rule
10

There's a fair number of Chasidic-looking people around my neighborhood, but the young mothers don't see that young. Maybe the hair-covering thing adds five years. Maybe I don't know what Chasidic looks like.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
11

Aha -- the author is from Lakewood, NJ. Largest Chasidic community in the country. Very, very shady local government. School system currently being taken over by the state.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
12

Here she is talking about her own forced/arranged marriage.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:12 AM
horizontal rule
13
For the longest time, Reiss says, she was told the outside world was a terrible, unhappy place and that the Orthodox way of life, including the marriages, was superior.

At least they got it half right.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:19 AM
horizontal rule
14

The link in 12 is interesting. Thanks for finding it.

I do think that the religion and ethnicity/immigration angles are tough ones here. They can be both stumbling blocks that cause people to potentially mis-attribute what's going on (it's because of their religion! or maybe just plain old misogyny) but also may prevent judges or others from appropriately scrutinizing the case in front of them.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:33 AM
horizontal rule
15

I do think that the religion and ethnicity/immigration angles are tough ones here. They can be both stumbling blocks that cause people to potentially mis-attribute what's going on (it's because of their religion! or maybe just plain old misogyny) but also may prevent judges or others from appropriately scrutinizing the case in front of them.

Location. Location. Location. In 23 years of practicing family law, I do not recall these issues ever coming up. (Outside of a few 15/16 year olds marrying their older bfs to avoid legal trouble.)

I am certain that where I practice has a lot to do with it. (Not tons of immigrants, other than recently from El Salvador.) But I can't even recall reading about these kinds of issues in Virginia courts.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:48 AM
horizontal rule
16

The author's email is on her nonprofit's webpage - one could ask what they think of the possibility.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:49 AM
horizontal rule
17

15: Virginia is for lovers, not marrying.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:51 AM
horizontal rule
18

14.last: Right. I was mulling over in my head whether the immigrant communities in NJ (South Asian, African) where "arranged" marriages are a thing would receive more or less scrutiny. I can see it going either way, à la: "Crazy foreigners! What are they up to! Citizenship scam!" or "Who the hell knows what these people do?! Approved!"


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:58 AM
horizontal rule
19

"That's a really mature-looking ten-year-old. Approved!"


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
20

Actually, I knew a girl in high school who had an arranged marriage. There was a guy she was promised to -- and had been for a while, but they didn't marry them until they were out of school. She was Greek.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:01 AM
horizontal rule
21

She got married while in a sorority?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:02 AM
horizontal rule
22

18: I think Orthodox Jews, specifically, in the Northeast at least, might hit a sweet spot of "Who the hell knows what these people do?" combined with "They're a perfectly normal part of the local community", which might get them more "Yeah, you do whatever, I'm not getting into it" than another group might.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:03 AM
horizontal rule
23

19: I really don't get the 10 year old one. Do the judges have to meet the people involved, or are there just forms that cross their desk? Is there an administrative law clerk who just stamps lots of these forms all day "Pakistani names, sure sure sure"? Oof.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:04 AM
horizontal rule
24

Eventually, they will meet their natural enemy: a judge that rides a bicycle.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:04 AM
horizontal rule
25

23: I would guess the typo explanation is right and the kid was really 15. Which doesn't exactly answer all my questions, but what can you do?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:06 AM
horizontal rule
26

22: Right, that's what I was thinking in 8 -- a part of the community, no citizenship issues, a certain recognition and acceptance of the "sure, they get married at 17."


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:07 AM
horizontal rule
27

I dated a girl who later had an arranged marriage. She was a shitty Muslim at the time, which makes for a lot of fun. Now she's a more serious Muslim and her daughters are getting up to the same hijinks she did, much to her distress.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:09 AM
horizontal rule
28

Possibly the 10-year-old marriage is explained by a judge who spent too much time listening to folk music?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:14 AM
horizontal rule
29

27: This is your round-about way of confessing that you are dating multiple teenagers?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:14 AM
horizontal rule
30

As I might have mentioned, my grandmother was married off when she was nine, and my grandfather was a good twenty years her senior. Long happy marriage!

There are some safeguards against abuse in place in a lot of communities that have practices like this--the girl's family can come beat you up and take her back, or even kill you in some circumstances--but mostly I think she was lucky that he was a decent guy and they got along.

But it's not like our laws are all that enlightened. It's basically "has definitely hit puberty" and off you go. If we were serious about protecting people from their own naivete, or preventing abuse, people couldn't marry until 25 or so.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:15 AM
horizontal rule
31

Or bragging?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
32

Not to put too fine a counterpoint on it, or to get too censorious, and I don't mean to run down New Jersey specifically when it provides so many other opportunities, but is there really any depravity that we would be astonished to learn has been visited upon children?


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:18 AM
horizontal rule
33

If we were serious about protecting people from their own naivete, or preventing abuse, people couldn't marry until 25 or so.

Do I go around trying to prevent you from earning a living!?!?!


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:19 AM
horizontal rule
34

Somebody must.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:20 AM
horizontal rule
35

My folks had several volumes of The Story of Civilization, by Will and Ariel Durant. As a kid I read that Ariel was 15 when she married Will and that she had roller-skated to the wedding. Double-checking her obit, I find that she was 15, Will was 28 and had been her teacher, and she roller-skated from Harlem to NY City Hall for her wedding. They were married 67 years.


Posted by: bill | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
36

30: all the same, I think we've headed in the right direction by getting away from a model where the only safeguard you have is hoping that your parents sell you to a nice paedophile.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
37

My first ancestor in VA married an eleven year old girl, even though eight months earlier he had a wife in England. Allegedly, the wife died on the sea crossing.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
38

That's an impressive feat of rollerskating -- seven miles or so on city streets.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:25 AM
horizontal rule
39

At least the girl didn't wind up with a philosopher.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:26 AM
horizontal rule
40

Fresh legs.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:26 AM
horizontal rule
41

I think we've headed in the right direction

Ah, the noble seeds of imperialism. As it happens, it turns out Iranians have agreed over the years, although "pedophile" is probably not right, given the cultural context.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
42

I remember that Kansas/Nebraska story. I thought that Nebraska was ridiculous for prosecuting the guy. They'd gotten married for real with parental consent on both sides and the guy was raising the kid he'd had with the 14 yr old, who seemed relatively happy. How was prosecution a better option.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:29 AM
horizontal rule
43

Even then, you wouldn't consummate a marriage to a nine-year-old right away, would you?

(Don't answer that if I wouldn't like the answer.)


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:29 AM
horizontal rule
44

25. Is marriage at 15 still legal anywhere in the United States, let alone 12 or 10, even if the victim appears to consent? I mean Jerry Lee Lewis is 80 now! Surely if a judge goes through the pretence of marrying such a child, whatever ensues is still child abuse and the judge is party to it and should do jail time.

The British government has recently become relatively proactive about this issue, under a lot of activist pressure: here's why.

Arranged marriage where the parties are adult and consenting is a whole nother issue. The issue is establishing consent.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:31 AM
horizontal rule
45

42: Because "I'm willing to marry her" doesn't seem like it should be a "get out of jail free" card for a statutory rape charge.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:32 AM
horizontal rule
46

(Don't answer that if I wouldn't like the answer.)

I don't know the answer.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:36 AM
horizontal rule
47

I agree that "pedophile" isn't the right word because of cultural context and all.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
48

Also, it's a little complicated. Assuming we're going to continue our 400 year tradition in the US of supporting intentional communities of religious weirdos and extreme cultural pluralism, there are going to be people who do arranged marriages for teens or have marriages under 18, even if these are only "marriages" under cultural practice and not state law. Making sure that these people are also married under the civil law gives the younger spouse a bunch of advantages with regard to property and support if the marriage fails that you wouldn't get if the marriage isn't recognized by law.


Posted by: Roberto Tigre | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:42 AM
horizontal rule
49

43. In mediaeval and early modern Europe, where the aristocracy frequently married children to each other for dynastic purposes, it was understood that the marriage should not be consummated until the girl reached menarche (Oh, wow!), which was usually assumed to be around 15 or 16. This isn't to say it didn't happen, but if it clearly did and the husband was an adult, he would pay a penalty in clear social disapprobation. I have no idea what goes on in Chasidic and fundamentalist Christian, LDS and Muslim circles, because these are recent developments historically, and pretty much pathological.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:47 AM
horizontal rule
50

Yes. I was thinking of that as an analog.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 8:54 AM
horizontal rule
51

I have no idea what goes on in Chasidic and fundamentalist Christian, LDS and Muslim circles...

Me either, except that they are probably worse in New Jersey than elsewhere. Once you keep a religious minority from pumping its own gas, it goes off the deep end.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
52

Same thing happened in Oregon where the Indian guru was driven to bioterrorism.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:11 AM
horizontal rule
53

51: Switching a zero for a five isn't a common typo. Those aren't next to each other on the keyboard, nor look alike (so that you might miss the exchange in a quick scan).


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:11 AM
horizontal rule
54

Huh. I have no idea why I addressed that to 51. Now there's a typo.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:13 AM
horizontal rule
55

Obviously, you're a big government type who wants to remove the freedom of all Americans to pump their own gas.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
56

I'll grant you that switching a zero for a five isn't a likely typo. But, it could be the typo was in the year of birth and it could have been hand written. Writing '1994' so that it looks like '1999' isn't that hard.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
57

That's as good of an explanation as I've got.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
58

Aaah. I'm talking about marriage for people born after I finished college.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:21 AM
horizontal rule
59

Fortunately, I'll never had to deal with the idea that people born after I finished graduate school are now old enough to be married. ABD is forever.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
60

58. Don't know what you're worried about, I have a friend whose grandson is married with a kid.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
61

I'm completely comfortable with you being old.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
62

There are people I went to high school with who are grandparents. I think they all involve at least one birth by an unwed mother.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:41 AM
horizontal rule
63

I am six times a great-aunt, which I find disturbing when I think about it.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:47 AM
horizontal rule
64

Especially since it's just the one baby.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
65

by an unwed mother

When my aunt was widowed, that was the end of the last marriage in my kinda-extended family. Counting my parents and aunt, and down through the cousins, there are lots of long term relationships, but not a single marriage. Sorry, Will.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
66

But, the men in my family do tend toward the late blooming. If I live to a typical age, my grandfather's birth to my death will cover something over 150 years.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
67

Here's to hoping most of that time is spent in the middle parts.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:00 AM
horizontal rule
68

I am six times a great-aunt, which I find disturbing when I think about it.

A great-great-great-great-great-great-aunt? You're moving around very briskly for a woman of your age.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
69

"Out of the Great Sea to middle parts I have come. In this place I will abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world"


Posted by: Moby Hick's Great Grandfather | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
70

I'm well preserved.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:21 AM
horizontal rule
71

I probably missed a "Great" in there. Even with late marriage, there are probably more than three generations between me and the Famine.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
72

My grandfathers were both born over 135 yrs ago. About the age of FDR or Douglas MacArthur. Eleven generations back to the first of my male ancestors on this continent, who was born about 1614.


Posted by: idp | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:34 AM
horizontal rule
73

Although they seem to mostly have data for New Jersey. Is New Jersey known for wildly isolated communities with bought judges?

Does New Jersey have one of those municipalities that is 100% ultra-orthodox Jews, or are those all in the Hudson Valley?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
74

11 to 73.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
75

My paternal grandfather was born in 1872, if I remember aright, a year either side at most. He was 40 when my dad was born, and my dad was 39 when I was. As a kid I found it counter-intuitive that I had friends whose grandfathers were born in the 20th century.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 11:23 AM
horizontal rule
76

That's about the same for me, but I'm twenty years younger. I was born after my paternal grandfather died and have no memory of my paternal grandmother.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
77

73: The story of Lakewood is nuts. The school district is completely in shambles because (and this was legal, incidentally) the ultra orthodox folks on the board (everyone) diverted most of the budget to bussing kids to private schools (yeshivas in NJ and Brooklyn). (In NJ, school districts have to pay for this.) So the kids in the public schools (poor black and hispanic kids whose parents couldn't afford to move) don't have books. There is a very well appointed public school for cognitively and physically disabled children, but students need to be specially admitted to it. At the time the Asbury Park Press wrote about the whole thing, no non-orthodox student had ever been admitted.
I know it sounds too crazy to be believed.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
78

Here's the main article on the complete school system clusterfuck.


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
79

Yep, oud, and life is SUPER great for the kids in foster care there. Or, well, not at all.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
80

Ahh. Here is the relevant bit:

"In the coming school year, the school board plans to spend an estimated $30 million -- or about a quarter of its $133 million budget -- to subsidize the education of nonpublic school students, the vast majority of whom attend private Hasidic religious schools. There are now 85 such schools in Lakewood, with another eight set to open this summer.

That outlay doesn't include $12.5 million in tuition to send 130 disabled students, virtually all of whom are Hasidic children, to the School for Children with Hidden Intelligence, or SCHI.

The highly regarded private, non-sectarian special-education school has catered primarily to the Hasidic community since it opened in Lakewood in 1994. As of two years ago, the district had yet to place any minority students at SCHI, whose tentative state-approved tuition rate for 2012-13 is $90,773 per student. District officials say that's no longer the case, but they could not provide any further details."


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
81

Leaving aside the horror of this, "School for Children with Hidden Intelligence" sounds like something Storm teaches at.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
82

IFAIK child marriages in all societies that practice it are actually consummated after menarche, with social opprobrium for those who violate this norm. In some countries with widespread child marriage (I'm pretty sure India) the child remains with his/her parents and only moves in with the in-laws after menarche. Child marriage in unstable places like Afghanistan is often to secure the safety of a child (daughter is much less likely to be kidnapped or raped by strangers if she's married), or by poor families who basically sell their daughters to support the rest of their family. I do know women from conservative Muslim countries who were married at 13 and very happily married 20+ years later. While I don't condone child marriage at all, I do think that the nature of a marriage relationship is one place where cultural relativism applies, as a companionate marriage based on romantic love isn't actually very common worldwide and is relatively recent in the West.

Semi-arranged marriages are still pretty common in rural China, where the parents pick someone and the kid ok's them. The kid can reject 1-2 people before the family gets a negative reputation in the village and the kid is considered too picky. I knew one woman who'd had a fully arranged marriage which she had initiated. She was 26 and well beyond marriageable age, so she had her parents pick a spouse for her, whom she agreed to marry regardless. She met her husband once and then married him 12 days later. When I met her she had been married for 8 months, was 7 months pregnant, and seemed reasonably happy, though her husband was gone most of the time.



Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 12:36 PM
horizontal rule
83

in Florida in 2001, charges were reduced to a misdemeanor when a 17-year-old married the 13-year-old girl expecting their second child, and he received six months' probation.

This was the craziest part of the article.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
84

I don't believe a New Jersey judge authorized the marriage of a 10-year old child. Is this even remotely credible?


Posted by: Just Plain Jane | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
85

84: Hee. We don't know that one was in NJ, do we? It's awful but -- especially a boy 10yo! Either a form was stamped unwittingly, or there was a typo. No one knowingly approved this. Anywhere!


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 12:53 PM
horizontal rule
86

We're making an informed judgement that it was in NJ.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
87

I told you they get up to some weird shit in Jersey.


Posted by: Opinionated Native New Yorker | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
88

86:
Couldn't it also be Florida?


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 1:13 PM
horizontal rule
89

Florida 10-yr-old would make a memorable twitter feed


Posted by: Nworb Werdna | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 1:25 PM
horizontal rule
90

I'm picturing a very precocious Cartman going before the judge - "Damn straight my dick gets hard. My old lady can't get enough of it Want to watch?"


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
91

82: I've talked to female tech coworkers of Indian extraction who were planning arranged marriages, of the parents offer/ young adults get a veto style. They were mostly horrified by the USian "starter marriage". (As was I, thinking of specific other coworkers we were sort of pointedly not gossiping about. ) I still don't know if they expected their husbands to be chaste, and I remember being surprised that they expected their in-laws to be major emotional support even in the States; twenty years on the latter makes a lot more sense - support or threat, one or the other.

Also, twenty years in, reverting to the Pikettyish economic grind, family connections as worldly support make more sense again. Alas.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
92

Nirad Chaudhuri's famous Autobiography of an Unkown Indian describes his coming around to asking his parents to arrange a marriage for him. Made the process seem decent and civilized, and he was a brilliant, educated man and the wife chosen was a graduate already in her mid-twenties. Another marriage that lasted the rest of their lives.


Posted by: idp | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
93

Poking around on that organization's website, it looks like they do allege Virginia has a problem:

Virginia allows 16- and 17-year-olds to marry with "parental consent," and allows younger children to wed with such "consent" if they are pregnant or have a child. The Tahirih Justice Center retrieved marriage-age data there and learned 4,474 children as young as 12 were married in Virginia between 2004 and 2013. Eighty-seven percent of them were girls.

Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
94

93:

I've just never run across it in my area of the Commonwealth. I just would have thought in 23 years I would have had a case, had a co-worker have a case, heard or read about a case, or run across it in the courthouse. Maybe I have, but I cannot recall a single one. Perhaps Northern Va, or Tidewater is different. But it just seems like there would have been more problems resulting in more appeals. Either in criminal cases or domestic.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
95

I'm surprised it was only 87% girls.

The fact that it's allowed in the first place sounds like a problem for Virginia, though. I guess 16/17 with parental consent isn't too big of a deal though. I did know someone in high school who was married by the time he was a junior. (On a related note I also knew fairly sheepish person in high school who was divorced by the time he was a senior, so I don't know that it was a great idea.)


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 2:41 PM
horizontal rule
96

Oh, I wasn't doubting you, will -- I think it's a bit sketchy that they didn't actually spell out what percentage of the "children" were 16- and 17-year-olds. I'm fully willing to believe that (assuming the VA data is accurate) there were a tiny handful of actual children and then some older teens, such that you would never normally hear of a case because 17 doesn't read as THAT much weird than a 19-year-old getting married.*

I think the bigger issue is that maturity is a continuum, not a switch, and yet public policy basically requires that we have some switches set up. Given that, a lot of our switches are still pretty arbitrary. Sixteen to operate a dangerous machine that can kill you or others; 16 for consensual sexual relationships with similar-aged peers; 18 for voting and signing legal documents; 21 for buying alcohol...we don't really have a coherent philosophy going on here.

*I frankly admit that my personal flinch would be pretty similar for a 17 y/o getting married vs a 19-year-old. Both just seem statistically way too likely to end in misery for me to be joyful if someone I knew announced such a marriage.

Having said that, I do actually know three women who got married at 19 or 20. I would not want to be in their marriages, but only one of them end up with an abusive jerk.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 2:54 PM
horizontal rule
97

s/b that much *more* weird

s/b ended up

I hate being sick. I hate chicken soup. I am so done with this stupid cough.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 2:55 PM
horizontal rule
98

You can eat other types of soup.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
99

An older study of teen marriage in the US (pdf)

From the Chicago Tribune:
"According to records at the Texas Department of Health, Liset was one of nearly 60 girls in that state who married in 2002 at the tender age of 14--the minimum age in Texas with parental consent. (A handful of other states sanction extremely early marriages with parental consent: In Alabama, South Carolina and Utah, girls can marry at 14; in New Hampshire it's 13; in Massachusetts and Kansas, 12.)


Posted by: J, Robot | Link to this comment | 10-15-15 3:23 PM
horizontal rule
100

arranged marriages, of the parents offer/ young adults get a veto style

This would be our next door neighbours, who seem happy enough after about 25-30 years. Their eldest son, however, married a woman he met at university, with the enthusiastic buy-in of both families. A problem with arranged marriages of this type, which I otherwise have nothing against, is that in the culture our neighbours emerged from (Kashmiri) they tend to exacerbate the already entrenched prejudice in favour of cousin marriages, since if you're being offered a spouse by your parents, you tend to favour candidates who are already friends, and wider family is where you find friends growing up. Our neighbours are first cousins, they have three kids who are all fit and above average intelligence, and I think they're quietly aware that they've been a little bit lucky.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 3:37 AM
horizontal rule
101

On the other hand, some of my cousins are hot.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 3:58 AM
horizontal rule
102

Nowt wrong wi' marryin' cousins, as long as everybody doesn't do it all the time.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 4:05 AM
horizontal rule
103

Anybody can marry a cousin. Casual dating of your cousins, now that takes skill.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 4:43 AM
horizontal rule
104

Kissing cousins.


||

When did Slate start putting up a paywall for their regular articles, not just the Slate Plus or whatever it is? I just hit my 5 for the month limit. Mind you I'm not complaining, just curious.


|>


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 5:33 AM
horizontal rule
105

You read more than five Slate articles a month?


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 6:18 AM
horizontal rule
106

My guilty secret is discovered!


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 6:21 AM
horizontal rule
107

My guilty secret is discovered!


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 6:21 AM
horizontal rule
108

Twice!


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 6:21 AM
horizontal rule
109

Twice!


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 6:21 AM
horizontal rule
110

Stupid phone


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 6:29 AM
horizontal rule
111

That was our fault. Sorry.


Posted by: Opinionated NSA | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 6:42 AM
horizontal rule
112

104: Only for ip addresses outside the States.


Posted by: hydrobatidae | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 8:11 AM
horizontal rule
113

112 Ah that explains it, thanks. I suppose a VPN would take care of that but if I ever want to read Slate that badly please someone shoot me in the face.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
114

Agreed. But I'm not excluding shooting you in the face for reasons of my own.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-16-15 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
115

Don't tell people in advance that you are going to shoot them


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10-21-15 11:50 AM
horizontal rule