Re: A vital part of the calculus

1

If our first Jewish president isn't Episcopalian (like Goldwater), it's equally fitting that they be "not particularly religious".


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
2

Haha, that's great neb.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 10:46 AM
horizontal rule
3

Previously, presumably, Jewish parents have held back on this front because they worry about their children turning into Henry Kissinger.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
4

Mel Brooks Bernie Sanders is Jewish?!?!?!


Posted by: Opinionated Homer Simpson | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
5

Trump gets a lot of credit for breaking new ground, but the truth is, a lot of our presidents have been assholes.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 11:32 AM
horizontal rule
6

This is all wrong isn't it? For one thing, this stereotypical Jewish parent is a thing of the past. Moreover, the stereotypical Jewish parent of yore wouldn't push their kid to be President. It's too dangerous! Also, it doesn't require good grades.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 3:15 PM
horizontal rule
7

I think it should be OK - I'm not aware of Disraeli having a similar effect over here. But then I wasn't blessed with a Jewish mother, so I wouldn't know, I suppose.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 4:07 PM
horizontal rule
8

It's best to fail really hard early on and then Jewish parents lighten up.


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 5:47 PM
horizontal rule
9

I'm just going to take this opportunity to say again that I have been aware of Bernie Sanders for at least 15 and probably 20 years (I remember writing him a letter early in the 200s for sure), and I had no idea he was Jewish until quite recently.

And I don't think I'm unusual. It's just not salient in the political conversations that I've been part of.

(My best yardstick for gauging the person-on-the-street is the number of crazy patron calls I've gotten demanding to *officially* know a person's religion. Bernie Sanders = zero. Neither elderly Jews nor elderly anti-Semitic people seem to be aware of his heritage to the extent that they call up their local library demanding proof. Paul Newman on the other hand? Still popular.)


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 5:53 PM
horizontal rule
10

8: yeah, that worked for me too.


Posted by: Peep | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:04 PM
horizontal rule
11

8: yeah, that worked for me too.


Posted by: Peep | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:04 PM
horizontal rule
12

Can you all tell I now own a smartphone?


Posted by: Peep | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:06 PM
horizontal rule
13

If I were an elderly Jew I would take it as read that "Bernie Sanders" is Jewish.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:09 PM
horizontal rule
14

Also, I mean, I admit I haven't been aware of Sanders for very long, and I the only political conversations I've had in which his religion has been a factor have been of the "but could a Jew really be elected?", and yet … his yiddishkeit shone through.

Also also, the average person on the street might be different from the average crazy patron who calls a library with questions about Paul Newman's religion, just a thought.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:15 PM
horizontal rule
15

13: for serious. The reason the question doesn't come up so much might instead be that it is not very mysterious.


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:15 PM
horizontal rule
16

italicized "might" jinx!


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:15 PM
horizontal rule
17

I will provide you a coke at the earliest possibility.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:17 PM
horizontal rule
18

Sorry, tone is hard to read. My tongue was firmly in my cheek regarding patron calls. I am confident in saying that patrons who are obsessed with knowing someone else's "real" religion are pretty far on one side of the bell curve of the "general public."

That said, I was serious about the comparison of Sanders to other celebrities about whom I've gotten queries. Paul Newman is arguably not stereotypically Jewish, but I've gotten plenty of calls over the years about celebrities that I thought were laughably obvious (of whatever faith) -- and yet people still wanted official confirmation.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:22 PM
horizontal rule
19

Paul Newman was Jewish?!?!?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:35 PM
horizontal rule
20

It's charming as all get-out that people still call the local library for information about these things.

Why, I remember the day when I trained with the Reference Librarian at our local municipal library about how it's all about knowing where to find the information. You don't have to have (know) the information, see, you have to know how/where to find it, and therein lies the value and the genius .... Etc. That man, the Reference Librarian, was very serious about his work. I certainly felt that I was being handed the keys. To the information. I swear he may even have winked at me a couple of times.*

(/reverie) Anyway, I'd have thought that people just, you know, google nowadays.

I just tested it. In google, typing "is bernie sanders" gives me these autofill options: married, rich, left handed, democrat. Huh. No Jewish.

* This was pre-internet, obviously.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:46 PM
horizontal rule
21

Left handed? People wonder about this? What's going on there?


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:48 PM
horizontal rule
22

21: Southpaws have been president at a rate disproportionate to their share of general population. Maybe the Googlers are thinking that being left-handed would make Bernie Sanders extra qualified to be president. Or maybe they're tired of all these lefties taking more than their share of the presidencies, and they want to make sure Bernie Sanders isn't left-handed.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 6:58 PM
horizontal rule
23

I remember writing him a letter early in the 200s for sure

Supporting his principled opposition to Septimius Severus's invasion of Caledonia?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 7:52 PM
horizontal rule
24

Letter?! That was an epistle!


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 8:15 PM
horizontal rule
25

19: Well technically, half of a fine looking Jew.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 9:30 PM
horizontal rule
26

It's funny, because I actually know several Jews who won't vote for him because they fear if he runs in the general/gets elected he'll usher in a giant anti-Semitic backlash once people realize we have a Jewish socialist for president.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 11:46 PM
horizontal rule
27

It's definitely a concern in some quarters, especially since we also have Trump in the race stoking the latent xenophobia of the electorate.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 11:49 PM
horizontal rule
28

Trump loves the Jews. Great negotiators!


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 11:58 PM
horizontal rule
29

True, but I'm less sure about his followers.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-19-16 11:59 PM
horizontal rule
30

What harm could possibly come from pitting right-wing populism against Jewish socialism?


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:09 AM
horizontal rule
31

6: there was a great Dizzy line from when the antisemitic Irish MP Daniel O'Connell was giving him grief in the House about being Jewish and he replied "Yes, I am a Jew, and when the honourable gentleman's ancestors were brutal savages in an unknown island, mine were priests in the Temple of Solomon."


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:11 AM
horizontal rule
32

Up there in ancestry related retorts in the Commons with "I suppose Mr Wilson is the fourteenth Mr Wilson".


Posted by: Keir | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 3:03 AM
horizontal rule
33

What harm could possibly come from pitting right-wing populism against Jewish socialism?

UGH, DON'T GET ME STARTED.


Posted by: Gamal Abdul Nasser | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 4:37 AM
horizontal rule
34

||

I have a bleg. I have to go to Cornell for a few days. I don't think i'd quite realised how shite it is to get there.

But, any tips? Fly into Newark and catch the local flight to Ithaca? Something else? I'm coming from London.

How long a layover would I need in Newark? One flight option only gives me an hour or so in Newark, is that asking for a disaster to happen?

>


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 7:22 AM
horizontal rule
35

You know who else discovered quite how shite it can be to travel to Ithaca?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 7:33 AM
horizontal rule
36

You have to do customs in Newark, right?


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 7:38 AM
horizontal rule
37

re: 36

Good point. Urgh. So, London to Ithaca looks about the same as London to SF, worse even.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 8:08 AM
horizontal rule
38

Although come to think of it, the short changeover is on the flight back, so maybe no customs.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 8:08 AM
horizontal rule
39

35: I rezemble that remark.


Posted by: Gradus | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 8:14 AM
horizontal rule
40

Look up Aer Lingus. It involves changing in Dublin but apparently you do customs there and I'm told it's quicker and less hassle.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 8:24 AM
horizontal rule
41

38. That could work. There won't be any passport control or customs at least. Odd that the US doesn't have exit controls with all of the concern about those who overstay, etc. But it doesn't.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 8:59 AM
horizontal rule
42

A lot of people fly to Syracuse and then get on a bus (or could do rental car I suppose) - service to Ithaca airport itself is infrequent and expensive, as I recall.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
43

I'm assuming several hours on a bus from NY Port Authority, the most economical way, is more economy than you can afford.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
44

So, London to Ithaca looks about the same as London to SF, worse even.

Yep, it's a small town in the middle of nowhere.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
45

Yeah, I knew it wasn't central. I think I just assumed there'd be a train.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
46

Congress has prohibited the placement of train lines more than 200 miles from the east coast.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 10:00 AM
horizontal rule
47

34 -- there's no easy way, and it's rural, but there are regular flights from Philadelphia, Newark, and Detroit to Ithaca. If you can spare the time and someone is willing to pay for it, you can fly into NYC and spend a night on either end, and it's either a 4 hour rental car drive or the same distance on a Cornell-sponsored bus, which is comfortable enough and your hosts will give you access to.

Syracuse, a crappy mid-size city, is about 1-1/2 hours away, and often nets out to more total time than driving from NYC once you include time to change planes.

If you're going any time but winter and have any free time it can be nice to have a car b/c the main attractions are pretty rural/natural things in the area. If you're going in Winter just stay inside.


Posted by: RT | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
48

45 -- again, check out the Cornell campus-to-campus bus, which goes 3x/day. And I think the Short Line bus now has a direct nonstop NYC-Ithaca bus now.


Posted by: RT | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
49

48: There was such a bus in my time, which is now up to fourteen years since!


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
50

Oops, sorry, it wasn't nonstop, but the stops took up almost no time.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
51

There are some nonstop economy buses from Manhattan, I saw them when I was taking one of the many nonstop economy buses from NY to Boston.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
52

Ithaca doesn't even get an interstate, so a train is unimaginable. Even if the US had a robust passenger train system, it would run along the old "water level route" through Utica and Syracuse (note, that's where the interstate goes too) and you'd still have to get from Syracuse to Ithaca somehow.

On the other hand, if it weren't for federal subsidies Ithaca wouldn't have an airport at all.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
53

Yeah, passenger train service from Ithaca was dead by the early 1950s, and would probably be one of the last lines to come back. But the bus service isn't too bad. I think you can still take Amtrak to Syracuse, if you wanted to for some reason.


Posted by: RT | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
54

Even when it did exist it was an 8 hour trip from NYC.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
55

Went through Philly:

http://www.american-rails.com/black-diamond.html


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
56

I don't think I realized how remote Ithaca is until I stopped at the turn-off from the interstate to Ithaca driving back from Syracuse, the one time I went to Syracuse. I think there was a piano in the McDonald's at that exit, though. Very classy.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
57

Oops, misread, the Philly one is a different route. Route split in Bethlehem. Lots of towns I haven't heard of.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
58

South Carolina/Nevada predictions or desires:

In SC, my dream out come is something along these lines with this outcome:

Trump 35%
Jeb! 25%
Carson 14%
Cruz - 10%
Kasich 8%
Rubio - 5%

My prediction is that instead we'll get:
Trump
Cruz
Rubio
Carson
Jeb!
Kasich

In Nevada, I predict Hillary will win by a small amount,


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
59

the final part was HRC will win by a small amount, less than 5%


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
60

Winning by a small amount seems like the most likely result, though to be honest I have no idea what is going to happen there. My guess is that it's somewhere between decisive/significant win for HRC or a narrow win (basically a tie) for Sanders. But it could just as easily be something else - I don't put much credit in the very recent polls, but the Clinton campaign's nervous attempt to shift people's attention away from Nevada after New Hampshire makes me think that it might be close.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
61

What I'd like to see in SC is: Trump in the thirties with five to seven districts; Jeb! in the twenties followed quickly by Cruz; Rubio a more distant fourth; Kasich a bit below him - well into single digits; and Carson almost entirely absent.

I don't think any of those except for maybe the Trump one is likely though. I suspect Trump and Cruz might underperform in this one, and Rubio and Kasich overperform. I don't know if it'll be enough to prevent Trump from sweeping across and snapping up all the delegates though - I hope not. Jeb! will probably beat out Carson by a little but not by too much and they'll both be between five and ten percent.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
62

34: If it isn't prohibitively expensive, your best bet is probably just to fly into Ithaca. These other options are mostly coming at the problem from the broke-student perspective; they work fine, but they're very time-consuming and still pretty expensive.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
63

I put up a SC/Nevada thread.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
64

There's truth there, especially if you're in a rush, though honestly as a non-student what I usually do to get to Ithaca from LA unless I'm in a super rush is fly to NYC, rent a car and drive up immediately, and then on the way back leave midday and plan on a morning flight from NYC the next morning. This is a little cheaper plus you're not at mercy of the flight schedule plus you get a night in NYC. From London I guess just fly, and leave more than 1 hr to change planes.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
65

Oh also Ttam if you're there May-Sept drop me a note on FB, especially if you're there for more than a day.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 02-20-16 3:39 PM
horizontal rule
66

Expense isn't the issue. The institution in Ithaca are paying for me to come. Obviously, I don't want to choose the most expensive option for the sake of it, but any convenient, quick, and reliable method is going to be fine.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 02-21-16 4:47 AM
horizontal rule
67

There aren't really any convenient, quick, and reliable methods, but flying is definitely going to be better than the other options on at least two out of three.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-21-16 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
68

61. That's a pretty accurate prediction; perhaps you should work at 538?


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 02-21-16 5:31 PM
horizontal rule
69

Oooooops, aside from Jeb!

Poor Jeb. It's almost like a Shakespearian tragedy.

Comedy?


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 02-21-16 5:33 PM
horizontal rule
70

Farce.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-21-16 5:43 PM
horizontal rule
71

Star Worse: The Farce Awakens


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 02-21-16 6:00 PM
horizontal rule