Re: Responsible And Erudite

1

Conversation with a Navajo chap:

"So this area isn't technically a reservation. It's a land grant; which means the Navajo have it on a lease from the federal government and we can have self-government within it. The lease was signed after the 1868 treaty, and it was a 150 year lease."

("So what happens when it runs out?")

"Oh, the federal government will just renew it. I mean, it's not like they want to start hostilies with the Navajo again."

(Awkward pause)

"Although we don't know which way Trump would go on that."

(Really amazingly awkward pause)


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:24 PM
horizontal rule
2

You missed the best guy:

Papadopoulos, a 2009 graduate of DePaul University, directs an international energy center at the London Center of International Law Practice. He previously advised the presidential campaign of Ben Carson and worked as a research fellow at the Hudson Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington. According to his LinkedIn profile, he has had meetings with the president of Cyprus and the prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. He obtained a masters's degree from the University of London in 2010.
A biography on Carson's website says Papadopoulos "designed the first ever project in Washington, D.C. think-tank history on U.S., Greece, Cyprus and Israel relations at a symposium entitled 'Power Shifts in the Eastern Mediterranean: The Emerging Strategic Relationship of Israel, Greece and Cyprus.' "
On his LinkedIn page, Papadopolous lists among his awards and honors that he was U.S. Representative at the 2012 Geneva International Model United Nations.

Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:31 PM
horizontal rule
3

Holy crap, I think I might have interviewed that guy when he applied for a job. His CV definitely sounds familiar. (He was not the one with the obscenely decorated campervan.)


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:37 PM
horizontal rule
4

Let it be the same guy. I totally did miss the model UN bit.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:38 PM
horizontal rule
5

Joke's on me when he becomes Secretary of Defense.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:40 PM
horizontal rule
6

Trump should run on switching the name back to "War".


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:48 PM
horizontal rule
7

2

Don't run that guy down! I was in the Model Maryland Legislature back in the day. The Senate, no less! The seats were really comfy.


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:52 PM
horizontal rule
8

Hey, how about that Hillary speech to AIPAC? Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran!


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 4:53 PM
horizontal rule
9

I used to be slightly acquainted with the first guy's brother, and thought I remembered the family being the subject of frequent Emerson comments, but all I can find right now is this one (aptly describing them as "barbaric").


Posted by: potchkeh | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 5:01 PM
horizontal rule
10

8: Remember how everyone was absolutely convinced, from about 2004 onwards, that there were going to be US air strikes on Iran? Either Bush was going to do it out of sheer bloodthirst, or Obama was going to get suckered into a war on Iran by the devious Zionist puppet masters or whoever?
And yet, in 2004, the US didn't attack Iran. In 2005, the US didn't attack Iran. In 2006, the US didn't attack Iran. In 2007, the US didn't attack Iran. In 2008, the US didn't attack Iran. In 2009, the US didn't attack Iran. In 2010, there was another panic on this very blog, and I said "This is me sticking my neck out: there will be no US attack on Iran this year, or next year, or the year after, for that matter." And there wasn't. Nor was there one in 2013 or 2014 or 2015.

But, yeah, Natilo, Hillary Clinton's gonna do it, for sure.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 5:11 PM
horizontal rule
11

I was in the Model Maryland Legislature back in the day.

YMCAYIG?


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 5:43 PM
horizontal rule
12

You might carry a yeast infection gene?


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
13

Genie.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 5:48 PM
horizontal rule
14

Young Male Christians Always Yearn In Goedelic.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 6:09 PM
horizontal rule
15

1: You should put him in touch with my Trump-supporting Navajo friend.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
16

14 is close.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
17

&: And Norrthern scum no more!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 6:42 PM
horizontal rule
18

& s/b 7


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 6:46 PM
horizontal rule
19

I was sent to the CA version of fake state govt back in the day, sponsored by the women's auxiliary of the VFW. All I remember from the event itself was a clog dancing entry during talent night (Fresno). But the dinner with the sponsors was more interesting. The aux and main ¿post? held a joint dinner. They each sent 3-4 students from various local high schools. We each had to speak about what it all meant to us. And it rapidly became apparent the aux and vfw where rabidly competitive re quality of "their" respective students. The guy from my school and I went last and it seemed to me the race was essentially neck and neck going into the final stretch. He went first and we got the full on juvenile diabetes Mormon family song and dance I'd heard from the dude for years. When he sat down the opposition was smug smug smug. BUT! I expertly deployed my profoundly deaf roommate AND the girl down the hall who'd lost like 3 siblings in a tule fog car crash a couple years before, plus lashings of general civic earnestness. Worked a treat, my side carried the day handily.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:33 PM
horizontal rule
20

15 is unrepresentative to the point of making Buttercup look like some sort of exemplary swing state voter. What on earth is the attraction? Is he hoping to leverage the "immigrants out" thing to a rather wider scope than Trump intends?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:34 PM
horizontal rule
21

20: No idea; it's very weird. When he posts about Trump winning it's always about how he's sticking it to the GOP establishment, which, okay, but the weirdest part is that he's a Republican Hill staffer himself. It's like, dude, you yourself embody everything Trump is running against.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:40 PM
horizontal rule
22

I've mentioned him before in one of these threads that I can't find now, specifically in reference to a post he made while vacationing in Colombia about how Trump was going to "make (Latin) America great again." What?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:41 PM
horizontal rule
23

Yes, Maryland Can Assemble Youths In Groups.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:45 PM
horizontal rule
24

I think Hillary can make Latin America great again -- with more death squads!


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:48 PM
horizontal rule
25

22: maybe he means "in comparison".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:48 PM
horizontal rule
26

YMCA YIG


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:49 PM
horizontal rule
27

The YIG folx were around downtown MPLS a couple of months ago -- I just thought they were funny 'cause the minders were all wearing yellow vests that said "YIG" on them, like a bunch of overly serious Lovecraft con goers.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 7:56 PM
horizontal rule
28

24 raises the question of how close Trump is to going full-on International Jewish Conspiracy. Hillary's already getting a lot of flak from the left about her youthful interning for Barry Goldwater, her praise of Kissinger and her speeches to Goldman Sachs. (Interestingly, not so much for making speeches to the definitely Gentile JP Morgan and Citigroup.)

If Trump said the quiet bits loud on this issue, he might pick up quite a few votes on the left from the sort of person who thinks all Jews are just Israeli fifth columnists.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:00 PM
horizontal rule
29

Yes, after all, what's a few more dead Palestinian kids here and there -- "who remembers the Armenians" and all that.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:04 PM
horizontal rule
30

Kardashians?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:05 PM
horizontal rule
31

Bajorans!


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:07 PM
horizontal rule
32

29: it might be relevant to think back to what happened with regard to the Middle East the last time there was a Clinton in the White House. Handshakes on the White House lawn? Peace between Israel and Jordan? Generally speaking, more progress towards peace than in the two decades before or since? Is there any reason to think that Hillary was grinding her teeth the whole time Bill was putting that together?

Whether you regard 1993-4 as good news depends on whether you're looking for a general, fair and lasting peace agreement in the region or a final solution to the Israel question, I suppose.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
33

Jordan was great, but Steph Curry might be better.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:17 PM
horizontal rule
34

32- I don't actually doubt HRC's good will on this matter. The state of play is much more difficult than it was in the 90s though. The Israelis are no longer interested in a 2 state solution, and really there isn't enough Palestinian land left to make a state.


Posted by: roger the cabin boy | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:17 PM
horizontal rule
35

The last time I checked the number of people who fit the category "the sort of person [on the left] who thinks all Jews are just Israeli fifth columnists" sits somewhere between "that guy I talked to at a Lyndon LaRouche convention" and "completely invented by people who are unhappy about the number of people on the left who both disapprove of apartheid systems and refuse to pretend that Israel isn't one of those".


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:18 PM
horizontal rule
36

34: yes, no argument there. If Rabin had just worn his damn body armour like they told him to, the world would be a far happier place. Typical SF. "Oh, I don't need Kevlar, I can deflect bullets with the sheer force of my awesome."


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:19 PM
horizontal rule
37

35: RTFA.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
38

Wait, Rabin wasn't SF. I'm confusing him with Ehud Barak. I retract the second half of 36.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:21 PM
horizontal rule
39

The Israelis are no longer interested in a 2 state solution, and really there isn't enough Palestinian land left to make a state.

And the fuckers at AIPAC are a big part of the reason for that, but she's still happy to go kiss their asses.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:21 PM
horizontal rule
40

we have to be united in fighting back against BDS

So, someone who's threatening to bring the full power of the US security apparat down on a peaceful international dissent movement is going to suddenly roll out of bed on her first day as President and make Israel sign some new Oslo accords? (Which they would violate before the ink was dry, but that's a story for another time.)


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
41

37: Yes, remember: ajay hates anyone who's Arab or Muslim, or anyone who speaks up for them. One hair on an Israeli head is worth more to him than the lives of a million Palestinian children.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:28 PM
horizontal rule
42

So your theory is that all the time Bill was negotiating the first Oslo Accords, Hillary was furious with him for betraying Israel? Or do you think the Zionist Octopus got to her some time after 2000?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:29 PM
horizontal rule
43

41: yep, you got me!


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:32 PM
horizontal rule
44

But tell you what, Natilo: I'll stop telling the truth about what you think, if you stop telling lies about what I think. Deal?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-21-16 8:34 PM
horizontal rule
45

Natilo is trolling badly, but as someone who is neither USian, Israeli nor Iranian, and who is generally well disposed to all three, I would point out:

i. The United States needs to be dragged into further land conflict in western Asia like it needs an extra leg. Clinton is as capable politically of so dragging it as any of the remaining Republicans.

ii. The present government of Israel is bad for everybody, including Israelis. The President of the United States would do everyone a favour by not being sycophantic towards it, as indeed Obama is not, but Clinton, alas, promises to be.

iii. There is no good outcome for Iranians in the short term, but the least bad option is to prolong the political dominance of the more reform oriented factions of the elite who are currently in office. For the POTUS to aggressively renegotiate the agreements made by Obama, with which those factions are associated would weaken them, perhaps fatally, and would be a very bad outcome for everybody. It seems perfectly possible that Clinton, without actually going to war, would pursue this extremely damaging course.

tl;dr: Clinton may or may not be an acceptable domestic president, but on foreign affairs everything she says suggests that she would be a fucking nightmare who could easily roll back the diplomatic situation by 15 years


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 3:00 AM
horizontal rule
46

Terrorist attacks in Belgium.

God I fucking hate terrorists. I hate them so much that I can't put it into words. Why can't they just fucking drop dead in the street, and not add to the burdens of the world?


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 3:57 AM
horizontal rule
47

11

Not the YMCA; it was via a high school course I was taking. Maybe the Y was there in the background, because what we did sounds almost identical to what the linked Wikipedia article says. We passed a strict gun control measure, among other things.


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 5:15 AM
horizontal rule
48

Obama to AIPAC in 2008: "the bigoted divestment that has sought to punish Israeli scientists and academics"


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 5:37 AM
horizontal rule
49

45 is right, and especially 45.ii. Clinton is saying "Hey I won't be like Obama I've got your back here" in almost explicit terms a couple times in that speech. Also the level of 'the US and Israel are basically the same!' is pretty nauseous given how little there is to justify that that doesn't amount to "you're a bunch of white people colonizing somewhere!".

I did almost/sort of laugh at when she praises Israel for being founded on the value of pluralism though. I don't see how even strong supporters of Israel could manage to keep a straight face if they had to try to justify that one.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 5:48 AM
horizontal rule
50

a final solution

Don't say the quiet parts out loud, ajay.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 6:05 AM
horizontal rule
51

But seriously, ajay, don't conflate Israel, zionism, and Jews. I know AIPAC does it, but you shouldn't.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 6:07 AM
horizontal rule
52

Oh wait, I see: you're flat-out calling Nat an antisemite. Carry on.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 6:11 AM
horizontal rule
53

As a diversion, the Onion has this wonderful anti-Ted Cruz attack ad: http://www.theonion.com/video/brutal-anti-cruz-attack-ad-just-30-seconds-candida-52562

Could have been designed by Witt?


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 6:19 AM
horizontal rule
54

Clinton may or may not be an acceptable domestic president, but on foreign affairs everything she says suggests that she would be a fucking nightmare who could easily roll back the diplomatic situation by 15 years

Wait. Wouldn't that be a pretty huge improvement?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 7:06 AM
horizontal rule
55

54.1 should be in italics.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
56

54: IIRC 15 years ago it was all about the US and China arguing over that crashed military aircraft.


Posted by: real ffeJ annaH | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 7:29 AM
horizontal rule
57

If she can uninvade Iraq, that would be a really big improvement. Just as only Nixon could go to China...


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 7:35 AM
horizontal rule
58

I think China forced it to land. But still, not bad at all, comparatively.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 7:50 AM
horizontal rule
59

Speaking of Responsible and Erudite, NMM to Rob Ford.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:09 AM
horizontal rule
60

Somebody is fucking with the Wikipedia page for him.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:18 AM
horizontal rule
61

One of Schmitz's siblings is Mary Kay Letourneau, the ex-schoolteacher who received seven years in prison for child rape after starting a relationship with a 13-year-old student.

That is a deeply weird coincidence.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
62

So 31 dead in Belgium, and it gets no comment at all? Is this thing on? Bueller?


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
63

It was...bad?

It's hard to know what there is to say about it that's interesting.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:33 AM
horizontal rule
64

Killing Belgians is wrong, man. Sometimes it just needs to be said.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
65

You have to wait at least a few hours before people start going on and on in internet forums about how a tragedy confirms all of their pre-existing beliefs. Give it time.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
66

Anyway, will it elect Le Pen in France? How much mileage will Trump get out of it. Given that ISIS is claiming credit, how much more likely is it that NATO troops are going to Iraq? There seems as much to say about it as anything.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:40 AM
horizontal rule
67

Who the fuck knows. But it would be irresponsible not to speculate.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
68

65: Not true. I personally now see that I was wrong about everything, and I'm outraged by Chappaquidick.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
69

I agree with your statement about hating terrorists.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:44 AM
horizontal rule
70

We passed a strict gun control measure, among other things.

When my friends did it, they passed the official rules for calling "shotgun."


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:44 AM
horizontal rule
71

I really love Brussels (go ahead and laugh, but if you measure cities, as I do, by their natural history museum and their beer then it's really hard to beat Brussels). I try to get their often and I stay in what I think is a mostly Islamic neighborhood. So this one hits a bit close to home for me.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
72

Rob Ford's Wikipedia page no longer says he was descended from Chris Farley or that he died of an imploded hemorrhoid.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
73

My thoughts are with the people of Belgium. I'll change my facebook avatar to a picture of some frites. Happy now?


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
74

Anyway, will it elect Le Pen in France?

Probably.

How much mileage will Trump get out of it.

Not as much as you'd think at first.

Given that ISIS is claiming credit, how much more likely is it that NATO troops are going to Iraq?

Not much. Franco-Belgian unilateral action, possibly.

There seems as much to say about it as anything.

I think that's it, except for grieving for the poor fuckers killed, mutilated, widowed, orphaned, left to cope with long term PTSD. And I can't do that stuff on line. Sorry.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
75

But wait, the frites picture might offend the Rob Ford mourners. Facebook is so complicated.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
76

71: Was in Brussels in June - stayed in a hotel a block from the metro station.

I am also very fond of the city and opposed to terrorism.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
77

I mean, 74.last gets is absolutely right.


Posted by: Von Wafer | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
78

73: A picture of the piss boy statue, surely.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:07 AM
horizontal rule
79

The attack in Brussels hits home for me - it was aimed at exactly the kind of traveler I was two weeks ago to the day: same airport, arriving at 8 am, and traveling on a metro at 9 through that station. Freaky. Could've killed me, unlikely as that is.


Posted by: parodie | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
80

Anyway, will it elect Le Pen in France?

Probably not. Attacking *Paris* didn't get her the kind of numbers she needs to actually win, rather than fail gloriously against whichever other major candidate gets to the runoff.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:35 AM
horizontal rule
81

I have a friend who was on an 8:05am flight out of that airport. If the bomb went off at 8, do you think the plane was allowed to take off?


Posted by: J, Robot | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
82

Wait, Rabin wasn't SF

I don't even think he was Irish.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
83

if you measure cities, as I do, by their natural history museum and their beer

That's an amazingly good metric. So what US cities would top your list?

This Brussels attack is just awful. Am I correct in reading the airport attack as happening just outside the security gates, as many have feared would one day happen? Ugh.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 9:54 AM
horizontal rule
84

Years ago the detestable Anne Applebaum wrote an article on how Brussels no longer felt like Europe. I imagine she's masturbating furiously to the news.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
85

WTF did she even mean by that? Does she have a rare form of synesthesia in which continental landmasses have unique textures? Does Belgium now feel like South America?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
86

I'm shocked by the implication in 63 that were not supposed to comment unless it's to say something interesting. This place no longer feels like a blog.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
87

Her complaint was that Brussels was overrun by Muslims. She saw two doner kebab shops, which convinced her it was just like Cairo.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 10:26 AM
horizontal rule
88

85 -- Goethe wrote about how young America was superior to old Europe because America was free of basalt (nb - not accurate). Maybe Appelbaum noticed a lack of basalt in Brussels.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 10:28 AM
horizontal rule
89

Wrong, Walt Someguy. Noticing an absence of basalt doesn't mean you hate Muslims.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 03-22-16 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
90

unless it's to say something interesting

http://www.chron.com/sports/rockets/article/Dikembe-Mutombo-was-at-Brussels-airport-during-6955126.php


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 5:31 AM
horizontal rule
91

Goethe hated basalt? Really? That's not just an autocorrect fail?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 6:58 AM
horizontal rule
92

America, du hast es besser
Als unser Kontinente, der alte,
Hast keine verfallene Schloessen
Und keine Basalte.


Posted by: R Tigre von Goethe | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
93

I wondered about that. It turns out there was a major 18th C controversy about geology - one side thought rocks were all sedimentary, the other igneous, both were wrong - which as very often at the time was also a theological dispute with the use of other means (the sedimentary types usually thought God was present and intervening in daily life, the igneous-ers thought He created the universe and then left it to crack on).

Goethe was evidently sick of the whole thing and apparently convinced that nobody cared in the USA.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:30 AM
horizontal rule
94

the next stanza:

Dich stört nicht im Innern,
Zu lebendiger Zeit,
Unnützes Erinnern
Und vergeblicher Streit


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:32 AM
horizontal rule
95

***LOON TRIPLE POST***

Those last two lines could be the motto of the Internet.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:32 AM
horizontal rule
96

I wondered about that. It turns out there was a major 18th C controversy about geology - one side thought rocks were all sedimentary, the other igneous, both were wrong - which as very often at the time was also a theological dispute with the use of other means (the sedimentary types usually thought God was present and intervening in daily life, the igneous-ers thought He created the universe and then left it to crack on).

Gould wrote a book on this, though I don't remember Goethe coming up.


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:37 AM
horizontal rule
97

They staked me.


Posted by: Vampire Goethe | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:39 AM
horizontal rule
98

When we were in Brussels we went to a really cool museum of musical instruments. And of course the beer was lovely.

Cleveland has a very nice natural history museum for a city our size. The local craft brewery is kinda boring, though.



Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:45 AM
horizontal rule
99

I bet you don't have as many dinosaurs, even if you do have Michael Jackson's old glove.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:47 AM
horizontal rule
100

Yggles has up an explainer everything about Belgium, EU, Brussels and terrorism, Walloons and Flemish, mentions In Bruges which is a good movie but not the Dardennes. Ignorant liberal boor.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 7:58 AM
horizontal rule
101

The Same Bosses Jacobin, subbed "Fighting corporate trade deals requires uniting with immigrants and foreign workers -- not scapegoating them."

Thinking about the Dardennes, I have read a book on them, made me remember that they really don't much explore the immigrant experience in Europe, only The Promise and Lorna's Silence, although they do concentrate to an extent on the subaltern and marginalized, the globalized and those damaged by globalization, cosmopolitans of the other class. Their power is drawn from the concrete material specificity of the subject matter.

Looking at Fatih Akin, maybe Clair Denis, need more movies about EU subaltern experience, too many French are about UMC.

Thought has crossed my mind about the sites of this and other recent terror attacks, from a class perspective. Not a lot of airports in the Dardennes movies, not a lot of suits.

Too callous, too soon.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 03-23-16 8:23 AM
horizontal rule