Re: Attachment

1

Oh hey, I have thoughts! But mostly I'll just say that I think this sort of thing puts way too much pressure on moms (and maybe dads) who are basically healthy, or particularly who are basically healthy and responsive but dealing with postpartum depression or whatever. Inadequate and unresponsive care damages babies, definitely. (Ask me how I know!) But healing is totally possible, even for adults who want to do better.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 7:55 AM
horizontal rule
2

find in page "twin"- 0 hits
find in page "adoption"- 0 hits


Posted by: lemmy caution | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:03 AM
horizontal rule
3

Well, be careful - that's Dr. Sears pressure, not actual pressure. The real theory seems to say that basically normal, responsive parents do just fine.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:03 AM
horizontal rule
4

I also think it's bullshit to emphasize the first year at the expense of the next 18 years, for the record.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:06 AM
horizontal rule
5

I agree that it says that, but you think a normal, responsive mother is going to read that only 60 percent of adults have secure attachments and not worry that she's doing it wrong?


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:06 AM
horizontal rule
6

Not the way it's generally marketed and covered in the media, no. I mean, there's a million reasons why new parents are terrible hyperventilaters, and whether this is accurate isn't really going to make or break that.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:10 AM
horizontal rule
7

Stupid bilirubin.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:11 AM
horizontal rule
8

4: Disagree. Mara has been with me almost 6 years (so ages 3-9) mid-fall, Nia for 4 years (6-10), and Selah 3 this fall (13 months to age 4) and Selah attached drastically more quickly and completely. I wouldn't say she has any attachment problems at all at this point, though she has some sadness about the breakup and her adoption and how much she misses some family members we no longer see. Nia still doesn't call me Mom but she calls me her mom and seeing her navigate her relationship with the mom who raised her something like 2/3 of the time including the first year+ of life before she came into care has solidified our bond and also helped her heal there. Mara loves me with her whole heart and part of her still believes pretty strongly that someday I'll walk out the door and never come back. She is unlikely to ever have the solidity of trust that the other two have just because all or some of their needs were met as babies because very few of hers were reliably.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:11 AM
horizontal rule
9

Isn't that all consistent with it being a spectrum instead of a bright line?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:14 AM
horizontal rule
10

I mean, suppose Mara had a stable life until age 3, at which point she was completely in chaos from ages 3 to 6, at which point stability resumed. There's no data AFAIC saying that she'd be much better off than someone who suffered an awful 3 year patch elsewhere.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
11

I take that back, I see now you're contrasting Mara and Nia to address that.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:17 AM
horizontal rule
12

Fwiw, my anecdata of 2 totally agrees with the first year thing. Two siblings both adopted at 18 months, one with a stable foster family the whole time and the other with chaos and disaster. Although time has helped a lot with the latter brother forming attachments, 30 years certainly hasn't outweighed that first 18 months.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:34 AM
horizontal rule
13

I like this theory, because the first year of both my kids' lives went fine, so now I can freely fuck up.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:40 AM
horizontal rule
14

True! Maybe I should embrace the first year cut-off now that we're on easy street.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:42 AM
horizontal rule
15

I guess this explains why my "Wire Mommy Infant Daycare Center" failed.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
16

only 60 percent of adults have secure attachments
If true, does this not suggest that attachment theory is a crock of shit?


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
17

No, because high fructose corn syrup. Jeez.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
18

I took the quiz. My favorite part is all the questions that are just to see whether or not you are a person who obeys instructions. (spoiler alert: I'm not.)


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
19

She's a cat.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
20

It's my understanding--which this article more or less bears out--that it's actually not really a continuum. That is, that there's a whole range of parenting-infant-styles including some pretty negligent and even nasty stuff that doesn't mean much for attachment outcomes--that is kids raised anywhere in that band typically turn out fine-to-normal-fucked-up, or alternatively deeply fucked up in but ways that don't map onto early attachment. But once you get into really serious deprivation in infancy, i.e. kids really not being fed, or left alone for days, a switch flips and you get reliably damaged adult attachment styles. This is not a shocking conclusion or one which lends itself to flagellating mothers. John Kabat-Zinn can go fuck himself.

I took the quiz, I did great.


Posted by: Clytaemnestra Stabby | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:56 AM
horizontal rule
21

If your parents are disobedient during your first year, you're unable to complete quizzes as an adult.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:59 AM
horizontal rule
22

According to the quiz, though, I'm only SLIGHTLY less agreeable than most people. So take that, imaginary criticism of my authority issues!


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:00 AM
horizontal rule
23

I mean. I am not sure I share an ontology with a quiz that gives my response to "I talk things over with people" predictive or diagnostic value, but I will sew the Securely Attached merit badge to my sash nonetheless.


Posted by: Clytaemnestra Stabby | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
24

I couldn't handle taking the quiz because of the how-you-respond-to-your-partner stuff. Sorry!


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:07 AM
horizontal rule
25

21: Finally, an explanation!


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
26

24 "How do you respond to your partner who is a notorious goblin?"


Posted by: Clytaemnestra Stabby | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:11 AM
horizontal rule
27

Roll 12d16 for a saving throw.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:17 AM
horizontal rule
28

I mean, I can now say that there are huge differences between a romantic partner with fucked-up attachment who's trying to understand that and learn to have meaningful, healthy human interactions and one who thinks she's completely normal and the only person in the world who sees how everything should be with total clarity. But maybe secure attachment all around would make for a better setup.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
29

I have a hard time not gaming quizzes like that, where there's an obvious "right" answer. I am pretty securely attached too, although I have all sorts of other neuroses caused by my sort of dysfunctional upbringing.

Also, wearing my anthropologist hat, emotionally intimacy and healthy communication are culturally specific, so I'm somewhat skeptical of the value of some of these questions, as CS notes.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
30

my anthropologist hat

Pith helmet?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
31

I think this was probably a bad month for me to take this quiz.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
32

Quiz: Should You Quit Sniffing Glue This Month?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
33

31: There could never be a good month for me to take that quiz.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
34

Any quiz which leaves off toilet training is clearly invalid.


Posted by: Opinionated Freud | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:35 AM
horizontal rule
35

33 to 32.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
36

Roll 12d16 for a saving throw.

16 is not one of the platonic solids, so I don't know of 16-sided dice </pedantry>


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
37

Also that quiz made me very curious about whether most (any? healthy?) people find being ill or going to the emergency room to be pleasant, non-stressful events. Whee! Another field trip!


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
38

36: You use 2 eight-sided dice.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
39

36: LMGTFY


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
40

You use 2 eight-sided dice.

I see that nosflow has already pwned me on the entire subject, but, personally, I'd use 2 four-sided dice.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
41

36: LMGTFY

If anyone's curious (and I don't know why you would be) the dice on this page are interesting. The d14 and d24 (with triangular faces) both look wrong to me, and I find that interesting.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
42

37: Yuck! Hang in there!

I have found that ERs vary pretty widely in terms of extra stress and wait time.


Posted by: J, Robot | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:43 AM
horizontal rule
43

36: dice do not have to be platonic solids to be unbiased. Witness, obviously, the invaluable D10.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:46 AM
horizontal rule
44

Also insofar as any of this is actually a thing, I think I performed anxious attachment in romantic relationships for a long time, because isn't that what love is??? (no). Some the 40% of us with ostensibly disordered attachment styles are actually perfectly alright young women who underestimate their coping skills.


Posted by: Clytaemnestra Stabby | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:46 AM
horizontal rule
45

Some are probably young men with a (hopefully) passing interest in ethics in video game journalism.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
46

37: Maybe it depends on the amount of stress involved? I can see someone reacting mainly with annoyance or irritation to something significant enough to make the emergency room worth visiting but not too significant overall, and that probably wouldn't meet the bar for a genuinely stressful event. (Or, I guess, there's always the "Ok I have the most amazing story about the dumbass thing I did this weekend when drunk..." factor which could make an emergency room visit into something amusing for someone rather than stressful.)


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:53 AM
horizontal rule
47

Our Children's Hospital ER/urgent care (they do the triage to tell you which to go to if you're not sure) is so wonderful and makes the wait as pain-free as possible that I'm not sure I could stand to live somewhere else, or at least not while I'm still visiting more often than I'd like.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
48

37: Wait, why are we going to the ER? I was going to stop by the framers and Target.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
49

Anything to get out of Target.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:15 AM
horizontal rule
50

bowlby, who along with Mary Ainsworth developed the theory, specifically talked about a primary caregiver who could be a father or even a small cluster of people. There is a lot of stuff about adult attachment including the concept of earned secure attachment.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:31 AM
horizontal rule
51

Nobody's going to the ER! It was just a set of questions on the quiz. Have you been to the ER recently? Was it pleasant? Was it stressful?

I was surprised at the prospect of either of the follow-up questions getting a range of answers.


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
52

Nobody's going to the ER!

Thanks Obamacare.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
53

I mean, somebody is probably going to the ER. Not me though!


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
54

51: I don't think we took the same quiz. I did the 4 minute no registry one.


Posted by: Heebie | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
55

I did the long one.


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
56

He was a long, tall Texan.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:45 AM
horizontal rule
57

53: Hurray!


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:48 AM
horizontal rule
58

Going to ER was horrible. We were waiting for 8 hours or so. The worst part was when Wendy Williams was on.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
59

58: and it only got worse when you arrived!


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
60

Since I suppose that this is the close family member / hospitals thread: close family member reappeared from the other side of the world (good!), only to be immediately sectioned by the police and put into a psychiatric hospital (less good!). Going to try and visit and see what's going on. And at least the family member in question is now safe, with whereabouts accounted for.


Posted by: President everything is awful | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 12:53 PM
horizontal rule
61

56: In a black dress? Just one look she was a bad mess?


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 12:53 PM
horizontal rule
62

re: 60

Best wishes. I have a close relative who has been in and out of psychiatric hospital on various compulsory orders and sections, and it's not the easiest thing.


Posted by: Alex Salmond | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
63

62: Cheers. It's actually a relief to know where they are, and in the absence of upsetting detail so far, the news feels mostly positive. (I may feel differently after visiting.) All the best to you, too - my relative's illness came to light in the last couple of years*. I imagine that it's tougher the longer that you have to deal with it.

*although it felt very obvious in retrospect, with a lot of foreshadowing throughout their life.


Posted by: President everything is awful | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 1:29 PM
horizontal rule
64

Sorry, Pres. That sort of thing is really hard to deal with, especially from afar. If any of us are nearby, there are good people here who might be able to help a bit.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 1:54 PM
horizontal rule
65

That (longer, at least) quiz isn't easy to take if you actually do fit into one of the less healthy sections. I mean, I could probably have guessed at the results given the available possibilities beforehand, but by the end I definitely knew what the results would be.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 5:06 PM
horizontal rule
66

Quiz says I am destined for loneliness.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 5:13 PM
horizontal rule
67

We all go into death alone.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 5:20 PM
horizontal rule
68

"As in what ways?

From inexistence to existence he came to many and was
as one received: existence with existence he was with any as any with any: from existence to nonexistence gone he would be by all as none perceived." ( Ulysses p 778)


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 5:28 PM
horizontal rule
69

Sure the test says dismissive/avoidant, but if so that means I'll really only have unhealthy relationships so not having any is clearly the only morally acceptable choice. Actually that works out surprisingly well.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 6:40 PM
horizontal rule
70

60: Pres, I am very sorry. It really does suck. Sometimes (not always, but sometimes) it is better to have the person sectioned and in a hospital where they may be able to get help.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 7:25 PM
horizontal rule
71

What the hell edition of Ulysses is bob using that has a page 778?


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 7:49 PM
horizontal rule
72

The one with the forward by Chuck Tingle.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 7:55 PM
horizontal rule
73

I would buy that the point of Chuck Tingle is also that we go into death alone.


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:29 PM
horizontal rule
74

Because we deserve it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:33 PM
horizontal rule
75

I don't usually say this, but I think Ezra Klein should have assigned that article to a talented female journalist. I can think of many who would have brought a sharper and more interesting lens to the piece. It feels like he's still fumbling toward understanding his own thesis, and it isn't particularly interesting or insightful.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 8:44 PM
horizontal rule
76

71: Didn't look right to myself, cut and pasted it from a CT thread. Possibly the new/old Little Review edition?

But I was looking at the poetry and profundity rather than nitpicking for mistakes and looking to criticize. People read in different ways, for different purposes I guess.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:07 PM
horizontal rule
77

A family member is currently getting truly insane, paranoid letters from a distant relative who lives in East Fi/fe. It's weird and distressing, obviously, but also involves an odd, bureaucratic interaction with the local mental health people from the other side of the world.


Posted by: Lange | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:10 PM
horizontal rule
78

77 makes me think of the social-services interviews in How Late It Was, How Late.


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 07-11-16 9:41 PM
horizontal rule
79

re: 77

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2015/9/contents/enacted

Might be useful.


Posted by: Alex Salmond | Link to this comment | 07-12-16 2:17 AM
horizontal rule
80

My kid has been lashing out at me for the last week -- she is normally very affectionate, if a little moody, but will pull away if I try to kiss her, swats at me constantly, scowls and gives me the silent treatment for causing even minor displeasure. Despite introspection and theories I have no real idea why she's mad at me, and she may not know either. But it is pretty intense and has lasted for days. Feelings are fine and all, but I am getting nowhere with the swatting and shoving and occasional defensive kicks. Maybe I should apologize more sincerely for the ad hoc day camp fiasco.


Posted by: Id | Link to this comment | 07-12-16 8:26 AM
horizontal rule
81

Promise her that in the future only well planned, rehearsed day camp fiascos will happen.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-12-16 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
82

My superego did not disguise itself well with the pseud "Id".


Posted by: Lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 07-12-16 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
83

I guess there's not much emphasis on other parents because you only need one good secure attachment and the mother is still more usually the primary caregiver.

The bit about predicting your attachment as a parent by your attachment as a baby is a bit worrying. My foster brother was diagnosed with an attachment disorder and he and his girlfriend are just expecting their first baby.


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 07-12-16 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
84

Update on close family member with serious mental health issues: they were voluntarily committed, transfered to their hometown, whereupon they promptly left the psychiatric unit, then walked over and broke into the house of their parents to try and kill their father. Sectioned by the police (not voluntary this time). Absconded by scaling a high wall an hour later, not found all night - I slept in the room next to CFMWSMHI's parents. It was quite frightening. Now CFMWSMHI is in a secure unit. I visited CFMWSMHI today in the new place. Very strange as they behave completely normally and are able to make jokes and tell genuinely funny stories about their condition, which has significantly deteriorated from when I last saw them. Sounds like it was touch-and-go that they made it back from the other side of the world, as their behaviour in [country where they were] was really quite dangerous to themselves, and it's not a particularly safe place to begin with.

National politics is mirroring my personal circumstances nicely. Boris Johnson is now Foreign Secretary, I note! Further comment would probably be superfluous.


Posted by: President everything is awful | Link to this comment | 07-14-16 9:44 AM
horizontal rule
85

Holy shit, President. I'm glad your relative is in a secure place and I hope there's a quick and effective treatment -- or failing that, a slow but effective treatment. (I watched a close friend have a schizophrenic breakdown as a young adult, and I remember how upsetting it was, but he really did improve over time -- although watching the side effects of the antipsychotics was also upsetting -- better than the alternative, sadly.) And I hope you get a break from the acute stress soon, so you can focus on the, um, chronic stress. Best of luck anyway, really.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 07-14-16 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
86

God, how awful. Sympathies.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 07-14-16 3:44 PM
horizontal rule
87

84: How terribly stressful. Hope your relative gets the help they need, and I hope you have a few diversions to give yourself a break.


Posted by: ydnew | Link to this comment | 07-14-16 4:56 PM
horizontal rule