Re: In The Toilet

1

...that I assumed it wasn't the worst of the grifters.

They back the coup that put Pinochet into power.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:08 AM
horizontal rule
2

You aren't kidding. (Back when it was part of a larger conglomerate.) Wow.

As someone who recently got out of the big evil for-profit higher ed game, I'm not entirely surprised.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:15 AM
horizontal rule
3

My sense is that to an organisation with 40,000 students on 130 campuses, $153M ought to be, if not chump change, easily findable. Am I wrong about the economics of these sorts of outfit, or do we get the popcorn on and wait for the report?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:16 AM
horizontal rule
4

I was kidding. I had no idea the two ITTs were related. I knew about the ITT involvement in the coup because of my detailed study of Latin American history my uncle gave me a set of Doonesbury books from the early 70s.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:18 AM
horizontal rule
5

Students now enrolled at the company's technical schools will be able to cancel any federal student debt they incurred for their education if they decide against transferring their credits elsewhere
Way to pervert incentives, G-men!


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:18 AM
horizontal rule
6

Co-sign 3.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:18 AM
horizontal rule
7

If you look at the link I put up yesterday about this, you'll see how remarkably petulant they are about this. It's almost as if they expect people to say, "In that case, forget about the $153 million. Our freedom demands it."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:21 AM
horizontal rule
8

5: I don't think it is so much "decide again" but rather "realize their credits are not transferable."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:22 AM
horizontal rule
9

Ok then, that makes it all better.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:25 AM
horizontal rule
10

7: For the record, you wrote:

Apparently, not shoveling money to private colleges is unconstitutional.

which perpetuates an annoying persistent confusion about the difference between private colleges and for-profit colleges. Not that I think anyone here is confused, but my brother certainly is.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:43 AM
horizontal rule
11

It wasn't my best link.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:44 AM
horizontal rule
12

I'm pretty embarrassed on your behalf, son.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:45 AM
horizontal rule
13

I'll amend it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 6:55 AM
horizontal rule
14

Do you have that power?


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:03 AM
horizontal rule
15

I just put a comment below it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:07 AM
horizontal rule
16

I'm only 457 XP away from getting to level 23 in Pokemon Go. Maybe I'll get the power to edit when I level up.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
17

I think you get the power of grayskull.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:13 AM
horizontal rule
18

This is one area where I'm concerned about Clinton*. Smacking down the for-profit college grifters has been one of the finer things that Obama has been doing during his second term. Given the Clinton's connections to that world, I'm worried that the trend won't continue.

*Yes, of course I'm going to vote for her & etc.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:20 AM
horizontal rule
19

Crazy things are happening all over higher ed.


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
20

18: She does in fact talk pretty tough on the subject. Not only more transparency and enforcement, which would be gimmes, but it also backs strengthening the gainful employment rule, and the new idea of "risk sharing" (colleges share some burden of defaulted loans), Of course if you google most of the hits are about the money she and Bill have received from them.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:18 AM
horizontal rule
21

The statement they released is fucking incredible.

We believe the government's action was inappropriate and unconstitutional, however, with the ITT Technical Institutes ceasing operations, it will now likely rest on other parties to understand these reprehensible actions and to take action to attempt to prevent this from happening again."

Remarkably, no single individual signed his name to this vigorous defense of the right to receive federal money without federal intervention. That's how you know that even they know they're scammers. Hell, I'd have more respect for them if they just released a statement saying "well, we and our shareholders had a great run at the expense of taxpayers and students, but it seems like regulators finally wised up. Good game, guys, and see you in the subprime consumer lending business!"


Posted by: Trivers | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:35 AM
horizontal rule
22

To the OP, I believe when schools actually shut down students get their loans officially forgiven, so that's a good outcome (as opposed to the school remaining in some kind of studentless limbo for years).


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
23

I enjoyed the "take action to prevent this from happening again." When I heard the news, my first thought was "This is working way faster than I figured it would."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:40 AM
horizontal rule
24

How about Devry? Aren't they the other big legacy for-profit?


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
25

Devry is still accredited. By the same body that accredits my alma mater, which is worrying.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
26

I guess ITT was still accredited also, but the accrediting body was actively trying to get rid of it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:58 AM
horizontal rule
27

So, what are the options for people who want a high-quality vocational education? Have the shady for-profits squeezed all the good guys out of the game?


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
28

They're out there. The good ones are super competitive to get in to. My colleague's kid recently got into one in Oklahoma City, I think, that is really competitive and everyone gets internships (there's a better word) and their job placement rate is high.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
29

Maybe I don't know about them because they don't advertise on daytime TV.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:14 AM
horizontal rule
30

Usually, when a funding body demands increased collateral, it's a sign that they don't think the funded organisation is financially secure, at best. If this outfit was looking for an excuse to cease trading without going through the insolvency process, they may have found one.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
31

27: Isn't it just the local community college?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:28 AM
horizontal rule
32

If the government outlaws guaranteed loans to grifters, only outlaw grifters will have guaranteed loans.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
33

Didn't DeVry go online-only?

I dunno. I'd be curious to understand the evolution of the industry. I think it's clear that, 30-40 years ago, ITT & DeVry were teaching people marketable skills at reasonable prices. Somewhere along the line, they realized that Federal loans were a more reliable route to profits, and they adjusted their business model to straight-up grifting.

But was there a change in the student base*, was there a material change in Federal loan guidelines that they could exploit, or was it simply that rampant, exogenous inflation in post-HS education costs created the opportunity?

*I'm thinking along the lines of: in the '70s a DeVry truck driving degree/license/whatever led you to a profitable career, and you could easily pay back school, even if the tuition was a bit inflated for what you were actually getting; but by 2000, the sorts of jobs those degrees prepared you for no longer paid enough.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
34

33.1: No, they still have campuses.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
35

Santa Monica CC used to have one of the best automotive repair programs in the country, made possible through expensive equipment donations from the car industry. Then with budget cuts, they cut the program, and couldn't afford to maintain the equipment. It's all been thrown out.


Also, my mother's neighbor's daughter, who is about my age, is a Jaguar mechanic and she learned her skills at a Portland community college. As I understand it she got very good training in a pretty lucrative career for a very reasonable tuition.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 11:00 AM
horizontal rule
36

As I understand it she got very good training in a pretty lucrative career for a very reasonable tuition.

Outrageous. It sounds like Portland Community College's business model is ripe for some disruptive innovation. Someone call Peter Thiel.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 11:07 AM
horizontal rule
37

My niece (Oberlin graduate) went to this school to learn to be a motorcycle mechanic. http://daytona.wyotech.edu/ She got her parents to pay the tuition because they were so desperate for her to have some kind of steady paid employment. I guess the school was fine, and she was able to get a job, but she hated it, because of the people she had to work with. So she recommitted to her art and is back to living La Vie Boheme.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 11:18 AM
horizontal rule
38

We spent the weekend a few weeks ago with a young couple, the man of which is a union sprinklerfitter. They're looking for people nationwide.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
39

I am large, I contain multitudes.


Posted by: Opinionated Sprinklefitter | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
40

My cousin's wife is a union electrician. There was some kind of training program through the hiring hall, which was super hard to get into (long waiting list, etc) and then some kind of other waiting something you had to go through. And the training sounded for real hard. But having jumped through those hurdles apparently you get guaranteed work, clear 100k annually and only have to 4 days a week, normal hours on those days. Seems pretty rad, says harried paper pushing loser professional me who is now on day 3 of under 3h sleep/night.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
41

Electrician bootcamp.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
42

Electrician father/uncle/whatever.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:00 PM
horizontal rule
43

If anyone's looking for vocational education in sexy nursing assistance, apparently my neighborhood is the place to go.


Posted by: potchkeh | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
44

Who is buried under the plastic?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:03 PM
horizontal rule
45

An acquaintance of mine worked briefly in construction, mainly on crappy apartment complexes and flimsy mcmansions in Southern California. He definitely thought that the electricians were the most professional people on the job. As he put it, "You can get away with half-assing a lot of things, but not the electricity".


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
46

I'd prefer the plumbing to be full-assed also.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:05 PM
horizontal rule
47

For both literal and metaphorical asses.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
48

Somewhere along the line, they realized that Federal loans were a more reliable route to profits, and they adjusted their business model to straight-up grifting.

There's a pilot program to allow students to use federal student loans to attend software engineering bootcamps. They have to partner with an accredited higher ed institution and are monitored by a third-party, but I do worry about this.


Posted by: Criminally Bulgur | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:11 PM
horizontal rule
49

43

Everything about that is perfect.

"how about a picture of a nurse?"
"I got this one off the internet"
"Looks fine, run with it."

Also, "beware of free classes". If you're going to get scammed into worthless classes, at least make sure you're paying a lot for them.


Posted by: F | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:16 PM
horizontal rule
50

It took me a second to see what was weird about that. I say if you're gonna be a nursing assistant, why not be a sexy nursing assisitant.


Posted by: R Tigre | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:41 PM
horizontal rule
51

I've just never seen a real nurse uniform with so much red trim.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
52

I don't know, a lot of the electrical in my house was pretty half assed until we paid someone to fix it, I think the previous owners did a lot of DIY stuff and found some configuration that worked even if it wasn't strictly legal or safe.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
53

"It hasn't burned the house down yet" is not a very good proxy for an effective electrical system.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
54

There was some kind of training program through the hiring hall, which was super hard to get into

I think this is a problem. A lot of training ends up being run by the trades themselves, rather than public institutions. Which, I guess that's nice for the trades, but then they get to limit the number of people qualified to do the work, which is problematic from an equal opportunity perspective and from an I-don't-want-to-be-price-gouged-by-my-plumber perspective. It also means that they are missing out on education subsidies available to college-bound folks.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
55

It did (lightly) electrocute a kid once. But the previous owners didn't have kids so they couldn't run that test, burning down or not was the only thing they could measure.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:03 PM
horizontal rule
56

Actually got me once too. You'd think if the light switch is off it's ok to touch the base of the lamp but no... neutral, hot, whatever, they're both wires, what's the difference.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:05 PM
horizontal rule
57

I visited an impoverished neighborhood last week where everybody steals electricity by tapping into the distribution cable with whatever half-assed piece of wire they can find, propping up the wires with sticks instead of poles, and every time the electric company comes by to cut their lines, they are right back up the next day. I would actually characterize it as "really fucking dangerous."


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
58

43 Leads to nowhere in particular (some google log on page for user content but nothing is there).


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
59

It's a picture of a banner for a training program to teach nursing assistants where the included picture is clearly a woman in a "sexy nurse" costume.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:10 PM
horizontal rule
60

43 Leads to nowhere in particular (some google log on page for user content but nothing is there).

I can't see it either. Maybe its blocked outside of the United States.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:12 PM
horizontal rule
61

To be clear, it's not a particularly racy picture. Just very obviously not a real nurse uniform.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:35 PM
horizontal rule
62

I can't see it inside the United States either. Do I have to sign up for Google Plus or Google Wave or Google Buzz?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
63

Dammit, I was promised a sexy nurse picture.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
64

Sorry folks. Really not that exciting but here's a different link.


Posted by: potchkeh | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
65

The construction votech program at my county's public technical high school leads to well paying, career type jobs out of high school. However, the school require letters of reference from industry members for ninth graders, so the program is effectively limited to sons of construction workers. Maybe a daughter could apply, but last I heard it was 100% male.

Similarly, the "alumni brat preference" for apprenticeships in most blue collar union-connected training programs is much stronger than at any Ivy League school. Which is why an African-American on the Penn campus is more likely to be a professor than an electrician or a bricklayer.



Posted by: unimaginative | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
66

I used to substitute teach at a vocational high school. A lot of white people. And the girl in the diesel repair program had to put up with all sorts of bullshit.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 4:34 PM
horizontal rule
67

64 Thanks all the same. I was somehow expecting an Alfred the Great meme when I saw the link.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:33 PM
horizontal rule
68

I'm sure Tigre will be along with one soon enough.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:36 PM
horizontal rule
69

I beat him to it.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 7:43 PM
horizontal rule
70

Perhaps more on topic


Posted by: foolishmortal | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 8:34 PM
horizontal rule
71

I thought the topic was sexy nurses.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:11 PM
horizontal rule
72

69 cracked me up.

I can't get the meme generator to work on my Android phone and I'm not going to risk using it at work. Certainly not with what I had in mind.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 9:33 PM
horizontal rule
73

Alfred wants his dignity back.


Posted by: lourdes kayak | Link to this comment | 09- 7-16 10:31 PM
horizontal rule
74

64 link totally captures my idea of a professional training centre.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 09- 8-16 4:37 AM
horizontal rule
75

everyone gets internships (there's a better word)

Apprenticeships. (Not the TV kind.)


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 7:23 AM
horizontal rule
76

Apprenticeships.

Really? Like you get paid, or at least board and lodging so you're parents don't have to support you as they do in most internships?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 7:49 AM
horizontal rule
77

|| So I'm thinking of switching my electricity generator (as in, the company generating my power) and I'd like to go green on this. I'm noticing that many of the options advertise that their power is mostly or entirely produced within my state. Is there any real advantage to buying such power? E.g., if I'm getting it from a national green company am I marginally encouraging longer-distance transmission that induces(?) power loss, or does it not really matter because such power losses are negligible and PJM and the other interchanges are going to be there no matter what? Is there any advantage over 1) good feelings when I pass local wind turbines and 2) not having to pay attention to local energy/environmental conditions in a much larger area? Note that locally produced green energy is significantly more expensive, although not untenably so. |>


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 9:48 AM
horizontal rule
78

77: No advantages beyond those two that I can see. Line losses from long-distance transmission aren't negligible but they're still pretty small, but that doesn't even really matter to you because it's not like buying from an out-of-state power producer means the literal electrons you use are traveling that distance. It's really just a matter of who ends up with your money. And yes, PJM manages the grid so that everything works as efficiently as possible regardless of who's buying power from whom.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 6:53 PM
horizontal rule
79

Thanks (and for the heads up in the other thread, too). Thinking of it as where I'm money is actually very useful for me--I mean, I *know* that at some level the physics largely works out so it doesn't matter, but it's helpful to be reminded that it's mostly economic chicanery.* if I can assume that green energy production is largely ethnical** then it just becomes a question of how much I'd be willing to subsidize the local green power industry. Which is a lot, since having a clear replacement for coal/fracking jobs should have important statewide political consequences. I just need to figure out at what dollar level I'd be willing to support it.

* I suppose this would be different if production by intermittent non-baseline means becomes a large percentage of the total, but that's not a concern now.

** Although not necessarily: I dunno if hydro still counts as green but that has issues both in regard to how it affects local environments as well as Native peoples; a lot of solar cell production occurs in countries (well, China) with weak regulations, possibly leading to externalities on again the local environment and workers.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 7:37 PM
horizontal rule
80

37:there's a joke here about Zen, art, and motorcycle maintenance, but it eludes me right now.


Posted by: Turgid Jacobian | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 7:44 PM
horizontal rule
81

if I can assume that green energy production is largely ethnical** then it just becomes a question of how much I'd be willing to subsidize the local green power industry.

Right, this is the real question you're facing.

I suppose this would be different if production by intermittent non-baseline means becomes a large percentage of the total, but that's not a concern now.

Yeah, this is starting to be the case in some parts of Alaska with small "islanded" grids. The main North American grid is big enough to absorb all the intermittent power easily and will be for a long time.

I dunno if hydro still counts as green but that has issues both in regard to how it affects local environments as well as Native peoples

We certainly consider it green up here, but yeah, there's a lot of disagreement on that point nationally. I think it really comes down to how you weight different environmental (and other) values.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:01 PM
horizontal rule
82

Another tradeoff is the effect of wind farms on birds, although the permitting process has improved a lot from the early ones where this was a big problem and it's much less of an issue with newer ones.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:03 PM
horizontal rule
83

But in your specific situation, I don't think you're going to have a lot of those tradeoffs to make.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:04 PM
horizontal rule
84

The birds can go fuck themselves.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:06 PM
horizontal rule
85

Well, obviously. Fuck those birds.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
86

Giant spinning blade on huge towers. If evolution can't work around that, they're going extinct regardless.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
87

The specific one I was looking at was >95% wind and the remainder small solar farm. I suppose I should check if any major migratory flightways that endangered species might use go through the windy mountainous zones to the east, but otherwise I mostly agree with 84.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:14 PM
horizontal rule
88

It looks like there is a branch of the Atlantic flyway that cuts across PA, but like I said above with modern permitting requirements it's unlikely a wind farm that interfered with it would be approved.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 9-16 8:36 PM
horizontal rule