Re: Guest Post: On Bullshit

1

I love how the comments section of the second linked article was instantly swarmed by bullshitters.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
2

Are we really sure quarks aren't bullshit? I have trouble understanding them.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:01 AM
horizontal rule
3

They come from a Joyce poem. Definitely bullshit.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
4

Per OP1, it does look good. I'll do it if they make it a MOOC. Even if not it's a good reading list.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
5

In our great state, when we have a societal problem with no obvious point of governmental intervention, we ask the schools to teach people about it.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
6

They ought to do a graduate level version of this course, wherein it's explored how much bullshit there is even in respectable empirical science.


Posted by: real ffeJ annaH | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 10:27 AM
horizontal rule
7

Quark is real, and made of quarks (and leptons). But non-quark things are also often made of quarks. Physics is confusing.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 1:17 PM
horizontal rule
8

I'm just saying, I can see electrons if I'm really hung over, but not quarks.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 1:19 PM
horizontal rule
9

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_inelastic_scattering

OP: facebook linking and blog commenting should be taxed.

One thing that is missing in the syllabus is the particular history of organized disinformation campaigns. Really good US examples of this are the efforts of the tobacco companies to make cancer links appear uncertain. Robert Park's fantastic book Voodoo Science has a lot of good detail on the people and methods that delayed action by nearly two decades.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 1:21 PM
horizontal rule
10

If I'm remembering right, quark co-disoverer Murray Gell-Mann held for years that quarks were not real, but merely a useful accounting device, only changing his mind when evidence for them was detected experimentally.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 1:25 PM
horizontal rule
11

I think many scientists had similar views about Australia. But I can infer Australia on the basis of my own observation. I've never been there, but I've seen a kangaroo.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 1:27 PM
horizontal rule
12

Of course quark is real! And required for superior stöllen.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
13

Of quark course is real! Of real course is quark!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 2:50 PM
horizontal rule
14

Why do we study vibrations, but not ESP?

Because there's no grants for studying ESP.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:00 PM
horizontal rule
15

I finally read the link (it looked serious so I waited until I had absolutely nothing else to do). It looks really good. Week 9 gets at my own personal pet peeve.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:25 PM
horizontal rule
16

The level of conference and fake journal spam (invitations to both publish and edit) is insane. Like most spam, it's hard for me to believe people fall for it, but they must.


Posted by: F | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:30 PM
horizontal rule
17

I get invited to edit a journal, give a talk, or submit a paper maybe ten times a week. I know that no reputable organization would invite me to do any of those things, so I just send them to spam. But I wonder what it is like for people with actual qualifications but not enough experience to figure out what is a fraud without wasting time on it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:31 PM
horizontal rule
18

I'm assuming anybody with a brain can figure out that an invitation to fly to China to give a talk that comes without money to fly to China is a fraud. But I wonder about journal spam going to somebody who is active as a clinician but hasn't published anything but maybe a case not or two.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:33 PM
horizontal rule
19

Maybe gmail could add a warning to it's spam filter. Warning: You should only pay page fees if you have a grant that will cover them.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:36 PM
horizontal rule
20

"Also, your penis is probably big enough."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:44 PM
horizontal rule
21

"If it isn't, the only reliable way to make it bigger involves a Mason jar and angry bees."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 7:46 PM
horizontal rule
22

||

I am reading Thaler's Misbehaving about behavior economics (mostly about the way in which common cognitive biases lead people to make non-optimal or irrational decision and the degree to which the economics profession has, historically, tried to avoid thinking about that fact). I'm enjoying it. It's an easy read, entertaining, and contains a lot of useful concepts and examples.

But it does occur to me that, had I read the book in my mid-20s it would have made me feel very smart. I would have closed the book thinking, "there are so many obvious ways to make bad decisions which can be avoided with a little thought and effort. I will be vigilant." Reading it now it just makes me think, "there are so many examples of categories of irrational decisions which I make all the time, and will probably never stop making. The best I can do is to muster the energy to try to be rational some of the time."

That observation is, itself, so old as to be proverbial, but that book provides a good example.

|>


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:03 PM
horizontal rule
23

Moby's 19-21 are fantastic.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:05 PM
horizontal rule
24

I don't know. 21 in particular doesn't sound so great to me, but you clearly have a better-informed opinion.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:26 PM
horizontal rule
25

Do you think that President Trump falls asleep every night after having committed multiple acts of manusturpation while imagining the long, sinuous, alabaster fingers of Stephen Miller caressing, seeking, finding...probing?


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:35 PM
horizontal rule
26

I agree with 24. 19 and 20 are good, though.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:35 PM
horizontal rule
27

I'm not saying that 21 appeals as an idea. Just that, as a conclusion to the train of thought it was well done.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:47 PM
horizontal rule
28

Now you tell me.


Posted by: One of Many | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 9:51 PM
horizontal rule
29

21 is almost certainly the cheapest effective treatment, at least while bees last. But it might make you rethink your goal


Posted by: NW | Link to this comment | 02-23-17 11:28 PM
horizontal rule
30

If the bees don't work, try Asian hornets.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 3:00 AM
horizontal rule
31

You probably only need one of those


Posted by: NW | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 5:57 AM
horizontal rule
32

Tri Delta.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 5:58 AM
horizontal rule
33

Get lasting bees now


Posted by: NEXT GENERATION SPAM | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
34

"...and that's when I noticed the pollen on my wife was from wild flowers and not the purchased pollen I prefer for my own dick-enlargement bees."


Posted by: Opinionated Divorce Pleading | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 8:58 PM
horizontal rule
35

"The government refused our grant proposal to study colony collapse because it looked like it might implicate corporate agriculture so we ended up sneaking our project through as a penis enlargement study."


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 9:23 PM
horizontal rule
36

Anaphylaxis prophylaxis would be needed.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 9:34 PM
horizontal rule
37

Anaphylactal sex.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 9:51 PM
horizontal rule
38

Talk about prophylaxis!


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 9:53 PM
horizontal rule
39

The "merkin of bees" guy at the fair will be great.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 9:54 PM
horizontal rule
40

Ouch.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-24-17 9:59 PM
horizontal rule