Re: Grand Declarations

1

"Maybe it's the three glasses of cognac"

They misspelled "peppermint schnapps."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 8:25 AM
horizontal rule
2

You just haven't made the crucial error of showing kindness to bored narcissists at your workplace, heebie; that was my mistake. Reading the link gave me a flashback rage headache.

Also this
Jahren advises women to, "draw strong professional boundaries and then to enforce them, not because she should have to, but because nobody else will." She further suggests that women "document everything" so that male colleagues cannot present harassment as a "two-way emotional exchange."

is unfortunately really good advice. Never be nice to anyone at work, people! It's a trap.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
3

Ha! When I was a fellow, I had an attending with whom I had a lively relationship. We generally got along, there was a lot of banter, and we would occasionally fight bitterly over patient care issues (we had some profound ethical disagreements about end-of-life care). In general we worked well together, and even talked about leaving the institution we were at to start up a liver transplant program at another place. One day in the lab while we were talking about leaving, a coworker needed his car jumped, so we both went with him. In my usual graceful way I straightened up under the hood and almost knocked myself out (cut open my head, blood running into my eyes, totally awesome). We went back to the lab and while I was sitting there, still dizzy and holding an icepack to my head, he told me that we could never actually start up this program because he was so attracted to me. He was married, couple of kids, etc. I have always been mad about this because although he supposedly was showing admirable restraint, I can't see this as anything other than a way to 'put the ball in my court,' and give me the chance (!) to declare my feelings for him. Also, WTF with deciding to do it when I actually had a head injury! Most guys just wait until you have a couple of drinks to lower your inhibitions.


Posted by: Dr. Oops | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
4

Blood loss and alcohol could be considered to have similar disinhibitory effects.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
5

Fair enough. I retract my complaint.


Posted by: Dr. Oops | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
6

Epic love letters at the work place are definitely not flattering and are a form of sexual harassment.

What about mix CD's and a customized storybook? God, has it really been almost ten years since that thread?

http://www.unfogged.com/archives/week_2007_12_02.html#007881


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:15 AM
horizontal rule
7

3: Maybe red is a flattering color for you.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
8

i have had numerous work-crush situations, and have always been able to wait them out without declarations thank god. i only ever had declarations when i worked in retail, and then i was extremely lucky because each time the guy (customer, not colleague) declared in carefully considered terms and circumstances where i was free to feel safe and flattered rather than manipulated and trapped. this is so rare.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
9

Or maybe he was a vampire.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:21 AM
horizontal rule
10

Well, clearly, all transplant surgeons are basically vampires once removed, and truth be told one of my markers for having a good day is if I have had someone else's blood on me, so maybe it was just all of the excitement. It did make the rest of my fellowship a little awkward, though. Not the least because I had a crush on a different attending (which I dealt with in the standard way, BY NOT TELLING HIM!).


Posted by: Dr. Oops | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 9:35 AM
horizontal rule
11

"That's odd, he never sends creepy love letters at home."


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
12

Thank goodness I'm so standoffish that I haven't run into this personally. I know it costs me a bit in career advancement, but I'm willing to pay.

That said, I didn't really appreciate my classmates telling me all the cute girls in the program were married. Um?

My program did include several professors who were fucking their undergrads, though. My favorite story is the professor who was married, having an affair with a postdoc, AND having an affair with an undergrad (the guy? Not super attractive. Maybe it was the accent?). He got caught by his wife after taking the undergrad to a conference and somehow using her cell phone rather than his to call his wife. She threw him out. He told his sad story to the postdoc, looking for her to let him stay with her. She was unaware of the undergrad and furious. She dumped him on the spot. He moved in with the undergrad and basically did the Walk of Shame onto campus every morning from the student apartment area of town.


Posted by: ydnew | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
13

Rather, it's the kind that prioritizes men's feelings, and their expression of them, over the simple act of treating a woman as a professional colleague.

This reminds me of a really interesting bit of stage banter. The Mountain Goats don't play one of their old fan favorites because he now considers it "misogynist bullshit." But someone paid him $60 to play it at a charity concert and so he sang it, but also explained as he was singing why he doesn't play the song anymore. There's a bit of this which really does a great job bringing home this point about male feelings not being so damn important. (Hopefully my youtube link worked, it starts at exactly the hour mark.)


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 10:25 AM
horizontal rule
14

Sorry that was me.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
15

He moved in with the undergrad and basically did the Walk of Shame onto campus every morning from the student apartment area of town.

HOLY SHIT!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 10:33 AM
horizontal rule
16

11 is appreciated.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
17

Most guys just wait until you have a couple of drinks to lower your inhibitions.

Sure, if they've got doctor-money.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 12:02 PM
horizontal rule
18

What the article doesn't explain is why women are leaving STEM. Is it actually any different somewhere else? One would expect business schools to be worse, law too.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
19

I think the problem isn't that the men are worse, but that you get the Smurfette effect* in parts of STEM were there are very few women.

*I'm assuming Smurfette is extremely tired of being the only possible love object for every blue heterosexual male.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 1:13 PM
horizontal rule
20

3: Not to state the obvious, but of course this comes with a helping of "Look at this possible professional opportunity that's not available because you're too damnably attractive (with a head injury)." It's not just the harassment, it's the closed doors.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 1:15 PM
horizontal rule
21

On the other hand, patients might have been a little leery of going for treatment at the "I Can See My Future In Your Eyes Transplant Center."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 1:25 PM
horizontal rule
22

The sign has John Cusack holding a liver over his head.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
23

6: Thanks. That thread was from before me, so I'd never seen it before.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 1:50 PM
horizontal rule
24

"I Can See My Future In Your Eyes Transplant Center."

I still have a fond place in my heart for the inspirational blind girl who wouldn't marry her boyfriend because she was ashamed of her blind self, and then she got the eyeball donor, and after the eyeball donation her boyfriend proposed and she said yes, and then after she got her bandages off she discovered that her fiance was the eyeball donor, and then she broke up with him because therein somehow laid the moral of the story, which was truly not ironic or deliberately off-kilter.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
25

I think there was a movie the Rock Hudson kind of like that except they married happily.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:00 PM
horizontal rule
26

Anyway, that's kind of a theme in Strong Poison. Vane can't marry Wimsey because he has saved her life.

I assume that's why they always prefer organs donated from a cadaver. The cadaver isn't going to call up and say, "Some nights I feel so lonely and cold. Like my missing kidney is a void in my heart."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
27

I posted a joke video of something not really sexual at the other place, and I'm friends with various cow orkers including my direct reports, is someone going to be offended by it?


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
28

Was that the Benny Hill sketch?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
29

It was a vaguely phallic food item.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
30

SPAM-penis.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
31

I no longer have any direct reports. They all report to a more recently hired woman who is a college of mine. Because I'm a feminist deeply annoyed by young people who ask questions.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:56 PM
horizontal rule
32

I've found lawyers receptive to studied and relentlessly persistent cheerful unwillingness to engage with work crushes, and along with the incessant mandatory trainings in big law it has worked for me, not that this is making much of a claim in favor of lawyers. But I could see the law selecting for a bit more emotional clueyness in dudes than stem.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
33

Or, maybe not emotional cluefullness, but a more vivid sense of plausible ways that sort of behavior can go bad for everyone? (And of course there are plenty of lawyer stories. I've never been approached unexpectedly with a declaration of love myself, but I've heard stories.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 3:17 PM
horizontal rule
34

I've heard stories from people in law school, but they don't really count as "love" because they all involve T/ck/r M/x.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 3:29 PM
horizontal rule
35

Ticklr Mix? Is that another dating app I haven't heard of yet?


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 4:07 PM
horizontal rule
36

24:
I hadn't thought about this music video in years. (Warning: It's really long, and fairly terrible.)


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 5:15 PM
horizontal rule
37

32, 33: Huh -- my belief was that this problem was fairly common in the law, because the legal profession attracts a fair number of narcissists and subjects them to conditions (boredom, lack of fulfillment, long hours that detach them from their personal lives) that make them feel entitled to engage in bad behavior. Also, a lot of male lawyers are deluded about their level of emotional cluefulness.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 5:19 PM
horizontal rule
38

there is a partner on my floor who is guaranteed to compliment my dress, guaranteed, causing all his colleagues within earshot to visibly cringe. he sounds a bit surprised at himself, every single time. i was least surprised ever the first time he led into an anecdote with "my frat brothers and i ..."

I am not claiming emotional intelligence for the profession, but there is value in being able to read a judge, jury or counterparty. also the ingrained habit of worst-case-scenario-ism per lb.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 5:51 PM
horizontal rule
39

6: That was a good thread.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
40

Everybody here has boring problems now.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 7:35 PM
horizontal rule
41

6: I just read the entire thread and am now dying to know, was there ever an update?


Posted by: Mme. Merle | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 7:41 PM
horizontal rule
42

Reader, she married him.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 7:49 PM
horizontal rule
43

The blog existed before Moby? MIND. BLOWN.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 8:00 PM
horizontal rule
44

I was quite late. Ogged had already quit when I started.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 9-17 8:03 PM
horizontal rule
45

You know, I bet Margo Timmins is the subject of at least a dozen totally sincere Grand Declarations every single night of her professional life.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 2:44 AM
horizontal rule
46

(I was recently consulted regarding a Grand Declaration that went wrong, and is currently in administrative proceedings. Six page hand-written letter, 63 year old man, 26 year old woman. Honestly, I kind of am the Grand Declaration type, so it was really cringe-inducingly great to get a close up view of the wreckage, and have the obligation to pontificate thereupon.)


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 2:54 AM
horizontal rule
47

He should have waited until she was 66 and he was 103. The age difference wouldn't be nearly so much of a problem.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 3:08 AM
horizontal rule
48

12. And he was not fired for inappropriate behaviour, why exactly?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 3:36 AM
horizontal rule
49

No horses were frightened.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 4:08 AM
horizontal rule
50

Does a six page hand-written letter really signal "grand declaration of love"? Not that I've ever gotten one, but I can't imagine it doesn't get really repetitive. I bet if he cared about her time instead of just her appearance, he could have gotten the same sentiment across in two pages.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 4:14 AM
horizontal rule
51

With that kind of age difference, it takes a lot of explanation to be sure the pop culture references are going to be comprehensible.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 4:31 AM
horizontal rule
52

That's true. I was thinking maybe two pages were a charcoal sketch of his erection.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 4:33 AM
horizontal rule
53

I still have a fond place in my heart for the inspirational blind girl who wouldn't marry her boyfriend because she was ashamed of her blind self, and then she got the eyeball donor, and after the eyeball donation her boyfriend proposed and she said yes, and then after she got her bandages off she discovered that her fiance was the eyeball donor, and then she broke up with him because therein somehow laid the moral of the story, which was truly not ironic or deliberately off-kilter.

Spoiler warning, but that's almost exactly the ending of The Lobster.


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 4:45 AM
horizontal rule
54

He didn't donate both eyes, did he? Talk about overdoing your declaration of love.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 4:52 AM
horizontal rule
55

If your love has depth, they'll need two eyes to see it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 4:54 AM
horizontal rule
56

How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach while still complying with the court order.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 5:06 AM
horizontal rule
57

||
OK, where do you max out on this scale? I can see making a 7 on a particularly crazy day but that's it. Maybe. More like 6 or 5 in practice.
|>


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 6:02 AM
horizontal rule
58

I don't even know what some of those words mean.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 6:14 AM
horizontal rule
59

57: The relative positions (on the left-to-right axis) of "females submitting", "males dominating", "females dominating", and "males submitting" says a lot.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 6:20 AM
horizontal rule
60

And why isn't the neutral gray color on the color scale half-way between the two ends.


Posted by: Blank Stare | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 6:29 AM
horizontal rule
61

The interesting point about that chart is the two empty quadrants - there doesn't seem to be anything in the top right-hand "so taboo and so hawt!!" box, which is surprising, and only feet get into the opposite, "not particularly taboo and not particularly exciting" one.

Which makes me think the two axes are probably measuring the same thing. Also, I suspect that if you're a fan of one of the dots in the bottom right box, you would probably rate it in the top right?


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 6:42 AM
horizontal rule
62

If the y-axis is a simple average of "into it" scores among all respondents, it makes sense that there's nothing in the upper right - it effectively merges how interested enthusiasts are with how many people have any interest whatsoever, and on the right end the latter will have the biggest effect.

So not measuring exactly the same thing, but closely linked by definition.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 7:51 AM
horizontal rule
63

That chart would be way hawter if it were plotted on a log scale.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 7:56 AM
horizontal rule
64

Also, I suspect that if you're a fan of one of the dots in the bottom right box, you would probably rate it in the top right?

Presumably -- for something that taboo, why would you do it unless you thought it was super hot?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 8:21 AM
horizontal rule
65

If you're not willing to give necrophilia a try, you aren't really being fair to necrophiliacs if you try to ban it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 8:33 AM
horizontal rule
66

Somehow, the slogan "Unfair to Necrophiliacs" has never been a big attractor of sympathy.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 8:36 AM
horizontal rule
67

Check your non-necrophiliac privilege LB.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
68

I thought Clerks had a sensitive portrayal of the subject.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
69

Anyway, it's big in New Jersey so there's no need to be an elitist Manhattanite.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 9:14 AM
horizontal rule
70

66: It's a new world. There was a time when "Grab 'em by the pussy" and praise for Vladimir Putin's strong leadership would have been considered beyond the pale. Once Trump comes out in favor of necrophilia, it'll be in the Republican Party platform.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
71

69: Jimmy Hoffa's never been so popular.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
72

Trump will bring scat fetishes to the mainstream, not necrophilia. Leave something for the Congressional leadership and Pence.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
73

71- He's done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
74

Pence reportedly calls his wife "Mother". I think we can identify that elsewhere on the chart.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
75

Unless his mother is like Norman Bates's mother.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:20 AM
horizontal rule
76

I don't even know what some of those words mean

The Japanese have more words for "weirdo" than the Sami do for "snow".


Posted by: Todd | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:21 AM
horizontal rule
77

I wish I hadn't looked up "sounding".

And "rapeplay" seems much more taboo to me than "incest roleplay," but then I don't have a sister.

O


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
78

-O


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
79

:-O


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
80

>:-O


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
81

I wish I hadn't looked up "sounding".

I can't believe how difficult I'm finding it NOT to look up "futa," but I keep reminding myself how much I wish I didn't know what sounding is, and here is my chance to not make the same mistake again...


Posted by: Swope FM | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
82

81 I looked up "futa" and I still don't know what it means.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
83

I suppose I mean I tried looking up "futa"


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
84

"vore" i take it is a misprint for "vole"


Posted by: Nw | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
85

84: Good plan, I'd keep it up.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
86

I wish I didn't know what sounding is

When whales dive, right?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
87

The thing on that chart that makes me curious is 'creepy-crawlies'. I mean, I know roughly what the words mean in English, but is it a particular term of art, or just people who get off contempating anthills/pillbugs/whatever?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 12:53 PM
horizontal rule
88

I assumed it was people who deliberately sought out pubic lice.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
89

#licentious


Posted by: torque | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
90

87: Don't know, would very much like to keep it that way.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
91

Someone's going to write a memoir about how they learned about taboo sexual practices from presidential dossiers and depositions.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 5:38 PM
horizontal rule
92

So I guess Truly Novel Sex Acts are pretty much by definition in the lower right-hand corner.

(Although maybe there is the Ice-9 of sex acts just waiting to take over all of human sexuality.)


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 6:27 PM
horizontal rule
93

Actually, is oral sex even on that chart? Maybe Clinton is off the hook.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 07-10-17 6:42 PM
horizontal rule