Re: Jim DeRogatis

1

Wait, I'm really, really out of touch on music, but literally the only thing I know about R. Kelly is that he got busted ages ago for, inter alia IIRC, peeing on underage girls. That wasn't career ending?

That is, I think his reputation is mud enough, but I didn't know he was still working.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
2

The linked article is crazy.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
3

It's funny - and I think I'm right - that "young girls" means 12-15 year olds, who are more accurately called old girls. "Girls" without the "young" means elementary school age girls. "Little girls" means actual young girls.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
4

Hell, Dave Chapelle did a skit about it over a decade ago. If this phase change in how we treat sexual assault is to be complete, he has to go.

I'll admit I did not expect the punchline to the FPP. My brain briefly went oh no not him too between reading that he was fired and the reason why.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:44 AM
horizontal rule
5

This has been pissing me off for years, and Jim DeRogatis has been doing incredible work.

As an aside, I saw the post title, and thought, "I know that name." It's because I've read so much of his writing on the topic.


Posted by: J, Robot | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
6

I mean, the annulment of his marriage to Aaliyah and the peeing on girls jokes have be widespread and well-known for fifteen years. But apparently he's just got a tainted reputation from it - not true wrecked career and jailed.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
7


R. Kelly isn't on the radio anymore but he never stopped being hugely popular with his fans despite all the peeing on people and statutory rape and enslaving people. Neither did Chris Brown after all the violence and domestic violence and whatnot.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
8

3: Yeah, that is weird, and I think you've described the usage correctly. A little girl is, say, 8 or younger. A girl or a big girl is maybe 8-13 or so. And then a young girl is anyone post-pubescent that seems too young to be called a woman.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
9

And "young man" either means 3 through 6 or 18 through 40.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:58 AM
horizontal rule
10

Aziz Ansari's jokes about R. Kelly surprised me because there's no direct connection to the offensive toxicity of what's known about him as an abuser. I don't alway have the energy to care about how people choose to partition their lives in dealing with art/artist separation but sometimes it's obvious and weird.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:59 AM
horizontal rule
11

I don't follow this man at all, but, according to wikip, the explanation for why he's not jailed is clear enough: evidence suppressed in Florida on Fourth Amendment grounds, acquitted in Chicago after a years-delayed trial.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:01 AM
horizontal rule
12

Right. That doesn't seem so much "inexplicably indifferent legal system" as "beyond a reasonable doubt is a hell of a strong standard, if you've got the kind of lawyers that can make it get taken seriously."


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
13

I haven't read deeply on this but my understanding is that the R. Kelly prosecutions have suffered because clearly and obviously victimized people have largely been unwilling to testify against him, in turn because they have been paid off. It is not an uncommon problem (not that I am an expert) in basically all domestic abuse situations (not the payiffs, the victim being unwilling to testify). The baffling thing isn't the criminal prosecution angle but the pass that he gets in the industry and among fans. "Pass" isn't quite the right word; everyone knows, it's not like his reputation is untarnished and there aren't people with qualms about working with him, but he continues to make tons of money and there are more than enough people willing to dance around that while the money flows. There's also definitely some sort of black man/black victim thing going on which I am not skilled enough to articulate well or understand, but as someone already said Floyd Mayweather (at values of much, much more money) and Chris Brown are treated similarly.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
14

There's also definitely some sort of black man/black victim thing going on which I am not skilled enough to articulate well or understand,

Me neither, of course, but a generalized sense of the illegitimacy of the criminal justice system because of the systemic abuses against black men, which unfortunately turns into minimizing or ignoring the harm done by black men even when there's respectably reliable evidence that they are abusers and criminals, looks to be what's going on to me.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
15

I don't think Chris Brown is the best example, because if IIRC people were sufficiently upset by that incident that he kind of disappeared from the scene for a year or so at the height of his popularity. He's back now and mostly fine, so he didn't suffer that much, but he did face some minor consequences, probably because Rihanna is rich and famous. If she had been poor, anonymous and black, like the women that 90s hip hop artists bragged about raping, killing and beating up, Chris Brown would have suffered no consequences at all. See, e.g., Snoop Dogg, Ice Cube, etc.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:41 AM
horizontal rule
16

13-14: Intersectionality!


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:42 AM
horizontal rule
17

14- I'd frame the underlying, subconscious attitude that gives the pass much more negatively -- black men are already balls of id/quasi-animals and the abuse of black women is *shrug* so why worry about it too much. This attitude is of course primarily driven by white racism but sadly seems shared by some black people in the industry. But I was serious when I said I am not competent to usefully understand or articulate what is going on.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
18

14- I'd frame the underlying, subconscious attitude that gives the pass much more negatively -- black men are already balls of id/quasi-animals and the abuse of black women is *shrug* so why worry about it too much. This attitude is of course primarily driven by white racism but sadly seems shared by some black people in the industry.

This would imply that white fans would downplay the allegations and black fans would take them seriously and stop being fans, which I don't think is the case. 14 sounds better.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
19

I definitely got the impression that 17 was true, not 18. But the dynamic seemed odd. The long trial delay certainly helped too. They delayed long enough, caught a few breaks at trial, and had talented lawyers.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:55 AM
horizontal rule
20

I think in this particular area there's a lot of internalized racism- I don't think even most hardcore fans think R.Kelly/Mayweather/Brown were framed or weren't doing what they were accused of, they've just chosen not to care. I could be wrong.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
21

R. Kelly was scheduled to be the headliner for the brand new Fashion Meets Music Festival here in the heart of the heart of all a few years ago. A few of the other performers announced that they would boycott the festival if he performed, and eventually the boycott got big enough that the organizers had no choice but to cancel his performance. Mr Kelly didn't make any fuss about this, so I imagine they paid him something, at least.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
22

20: Sexism too. With Kelly in particular it's these fast little girls these days are out of control and not being raised right and who can be surprised? There's a combination of judgmental churchiness and respectability politics and desire to see black men succeed professionally that overlaps in awful ways. (Not universally. I have lots of friends who argue in everyone's comments everywhere whenever his name gets mentioned. But my kids all know "I Believe I Can Fly" and not from me and yours may well too.)


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 10:06 AM
horizontal rule
23

Oh, hey, that's R. Kelly? Whoops. (My children had a weirdly obsessive Space Jam period a decade or so ago.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
24

23: It's going through another wave of resurgence among millennials--nostalgic mixed with amazement that something so absurd ever happened. Side note that its now-a-period-piece promotional website is somehow still up.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 10:34 AM
horizontal rule
25

I had no idea that was him either.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 10:45 AM
horizontal rule
26

23,34 Awful movie. As if Bugs would ever suck up to anyone.


[Where's my hat tip heebie? ]


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
27

Possibly related to the thread, maybe a derail-- Curtis Mayfield's "If There is a Hell Below, We're All Going to Go" is completely insane and a great groove.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:37 AM
horizontal rule
28

It's about time somebody merged Cotton Mather and pop music.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:38 AM
horizontal rule
29

27 Great groove. Thanks for putting it in my head.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:49 AM
horizontal rule
30

It's the opening theme to the new David Simon/HBO show on porn. I find that show extremely boring and with two James Francos too many. But one of the great opening credits ever.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:51 AM
horizontal rule
31

DeRogatis got fired from The Rolling Stone in 1996 for writing a negative review of Hootie and the Blowfish. That decision sure doesn't hold up well!

You know who liked Hootie and the Blowfish?

Hitler Bo Diddley! (From a 1996 Rolling Stone interview--it was July so I think before the DeRogatis thing.)

Is there anyone you do like?

Well, there's a few guys. Hootie and the Blowfish. Yeah, yeah. They're neat. A little different, you know. You'd be surprised, man. I like a lot of the things that's being played. I like a lot of the rap music up until it gets dirty. Then I don't want any part of it.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
32

[Where's my hat tip heebie? ]

Wait. Did you really send this to me? I can tell you're kidding but I can't tell if you're also serious.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:54 AM
horizontal rule
33

You know who's from my hometown?

Bo Diddley! He came and talked to my middle school.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
34

He put in the other thread, but it was well after you had it up at the other place.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
35

29 Haven't watched it yet so didn't know that.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
36

34 I'm not at the other place so I did not know that.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
37

There is so much I do not know.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
38

Look out behind you!


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
39

33: Bo Diddley Plaza!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
40

I didn't actually open the article at the other place. I just remember seeing Mariel Hemingway.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 12:03 PM
horizontal rule
41

Curtis Mayfield's "If There is a Hell Below, We're All Going to Go" is completely insane and a great groove.

I was just thinking recently about Curtis/Live!, which is an all-time great live album. Full of amazing grooves, really, really live feel -- you can tell they're playing a small club and the band is really playing off of each other. And, it's hard for me to think of anything else which is both so passionate about the need for social change, and comes out of what feels like a profound sense of love. He is angry, but the performance is more motivated by the feeling that people should be able to do better than by anger.

For example, the part of "Mighty Mighty (Spade and Whitey)" starting at "there really is no difference."


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
42

30. Huh. I was listening to artists like Ann Peebles and this came on.

Aaand her weird but groovy "Old Man with Young Ideas" extolling virtues of a May-December romance

While I'm listing odd soul tracks that are good, Gino Washington's "Puppet on a String" ambiguously pointed at either love or addiction, maybe both at once.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
43

Oooh there's a vampy hipster version of Puppet on a String by the Detroit Cobras, pretty good.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
44

Gino Washington was great because one of his songs was called "Gino is a Coward". Always love the third-person self-description in song titles.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 1:04 PM
horizontal rule
45

44: Do you know of other examples of this?


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 4:48 PM
horizontal rule
46

a generalized sense of the illegitimacy of the criminal justice system because of the systemic abuses against black men, which unfortunately turns into minimizing or ignoring the harm done by black men even when there's respectably reliable evidence that they are abusers and criminals, looks to be what's going on to me.

Or, to put it more simply: he's a criminal, and, fortunately for him, he works in a sector that valorises criminals. If he'd been acccused of a non-sexual assault - hell, if he'd been convicted and sentenced for a non-sexual assault - it would barely be thought worth mentioning.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 4:49 PM
horizontal rule
47

I have an update from our ATM from last weekend, the one whose boyfriend wouldn't go down on her. (one sec.)


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:04 PM
horizontal rule
48

She writes:

The boyfriend stuff isn't perfect - it's not a thing that's just going to be forgiven and forgotten easily. But the icy tension is gone and somehow we've gotten to a really lovey-dovey touchy state.

At first he was just saying sorry, and it seemed really empty to me, so I was not accepting the apology. Then he wrote a super long email acknowledging how awful it was and how he was terrified I was going to leave him. That he'd been selfish and hadn't realized just how bad what he said was, and that he's never said anything before about it because he figured it was a minor blip in all the good things. And now he regrets letting it go for so long because while he was just actively not doing oral, he hadn't thought through how much I may have been wanting it. He said it was unfair because I give him oral all the time and he loves it, and he's taken it for granted and even realized that it is often required if he's going to get an erection. So he'd thought about what it would be like to hypothetically know that I had all along had bad thoughts about it. He went on to say that he had been unfair to me because I deserved someone who was eagerly excited to do that for me, and he should have told me up front so I could make that choice to keep dating other people or whatever.

So the apology email went a huge long way in actually tapping into the sort of apology I wanted. He has also cried a lot which honestly made me feel better.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:07 PM
horizontal rule
49

Well, that problem is licked.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:32 PM
horizontal rule
50

I should have probably gone presidential for that.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:35 PM
horizontal rule
51

We would have known it was you.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:39 PM
horizontal rule
52

What if I used a VPN to hide my server?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:44 PM
horizontal rule
53

You could try?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:47 PM
horizontal rule
54

I'm not responsible for every horrible pun here.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-21-17 8:55 PM
horizontal rule
55

54: That's right. Stanley bears ultimate responsibility for all of them.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
56

The "original pun" theory of evil.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 7:12 AM
horizontal rule
57

That is awesome, ATM-er! Maybe continuing a thoughtful correspondence would be helpful, and perhaps it could evolve into an erotic correspondence??? I was a downer on the original thread, sorry, am very pleased things have gone in a better direction.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 7:15 AM
horizontal rule
58

45, there's Bo Diddley, and "Wu Tang Clain Ain't Nuthin To Fuck Wit" comes to mind.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 7:18 AM
horizontal rule
59

56: That's good, but I was thinking more along the lines that he was responsible for creating an environment in which punning was ubiquitous, unavoidable, and therefore tolerated.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 7:22 AM
horizontal rule
60

46 is entirely right, and there's a streak of ugliness going back a long way in black music that is or has been venerated by white kids: looking at you, Robert Johnson.


Posted by: NW | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 7:38 AM
horizontal rule
61

45. Roxanne's Revenge, a bunch of Yellowman tracks, KRS-One, Doug E Fresh, maybe Schoolly D

In both dancehall and at least early hip-hop, performers would mention themselves a lot in the tracks; I think that a) listeners needed help to know who made the track and b) singing about yourself was part of the genre.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
62

there's a streak of ugliness going back a long way in black music that is or has been venerated by white kids:

By kids of all colours, actually.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 9:46 AM
horizontal rule
63

61: The Wurzels also sing songs in which the narrator talks about going to see the Wurzels, which is a bit meta.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
64

So do the Wiggles.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 9:52 AM
horizontal rule
65

Darius Rucker of Hootie has a respectable country music career now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvKyBcCDOB4

that song is super singable and is likely the most popular country song at karaoke

Rucker didn't write it but he recorded the most popular version

the songs weird origins:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon_Wheel_(song)

"I'd gotten a (Bob) Dylan bootleg in like ninth grade and I let (band co-founder) Ketch (Secor) listen to it, and he wrote the verses because Bob kind of mumbles them and that was it. We've been playing that song since we were like 17, and it's funny because we've never met Dylan, but the song is technically co-written by Bob Dylan."


Posted by: lemmy caution | Link to this comment | 11-22-17 11:18 AM
horizontal rule