Re: Who's wrecking the country?

1

Those don't seem like huge differences, given the large gaps in education and demographics.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
2

That's your fact, not mine.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
3

I suspect part of the problem in distinguishing truth vs opinion is that there wasn't an option for "I think this is false because I've been told otherwise for hours every day on talk radio." The worst performance was the older group identifying true statements that they probably don't want to reckon with (particularly the Constitutional rights one). It'd be interesting to rerun this with the prompt being "Is this a true statement of fact, a false statement of fact, or an opinion?"

Pew's website helpfully has a quiz where you can test yourself...with the same questions you just read a report on.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:22 AM
horizontal rule
4

Older readers have worse memories.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:32 AM
horizontal rule
5

||
Can I request that external URLs not be embedded in FPP titles?
|>


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
6

Younger readers don't remember to preview.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
7

Technically I'd forgotten to put a post title on at all, and so the MM-HMMM appeared to be the title, but was smaller and lower and differently blue.

What happens if you put a link in the post title?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:37 AM
horizontal rule
8

Are there cross-country comparisons? My first reaction was that it's just aging, but this

the real correlation with poor performance is exposure to television news, which has fallen off among young people but remains very high among older people. This shouldn't be surprising, if we consider the evolution of American media over the past 60 years.
suggests it's specifically American, which is more hopeful.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
9

7.2: I assume that you fucked up and forgot to link. Then I mouseover, see an external URL and have a UX hissy fit. ALL I WANT IS PEACE OF MIND HEEBIE IS THAT SO MUCH TO ASK?


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
10

(That was a joke. Not actually yelling. Bedtime now.)


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
11

My first thought was "Crash Test Dummies thread".


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
12

8: I bet it's more specific than that.


Posted by: foolishmortal | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
13

I'm not going to defend the oldsters on this, but if people who are 18-29 voted as diligently as people 50-70, the world would look pretty different. Yes, I know that suppression etc accounts for some of that non-voting but, ex recto, I think other factors are way more important.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
14

Just to respond to the post title.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
15

Young people are the worst, except for old people.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 12:36 PM
horizontal rule
16

13: Since old people believe their opinions are facts, they have much stronger views on political issues and are more motivated to vote.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
17

Wasn't there another recent study finding old people easier to provoke into emotional decisionmaking (like purchases)? I can't find the link now.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
18

if people who are 18-29 voted as diligently as people 50-70, the world would look pretty different. Yes, I know that suppression etc accounts for some of that non-voting but, ex recto, I think other factors are way more important.

The thing that I'm always sympathetic to, though, is that it's extremely hard to learn recent history if you didn't live through it. So even if you're paying attention at age 20, it's extraordinarily complex and the backstory is a total mess. It just straight up takes years of trying before it starts to make sense, and voting before that means that you have someone whose advice you take. Thus presidential elections are easy to figure out if you have opinions on issues, but smaller elections are harder to care about.

Of course, it should have become much easier for any teenager to figure out who's bad in the last year.

But the obstacles to voting!!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 1:58 PM
horizontal rule
19

8. So exposure to the internet is better than exposure to TV news? I suppose if you read a wide variety of content and stay away from Twittare and Facebork that might possibly be the case, but is that what most people do?

18. Since school US history courses cover things in chronological order, they usually run out of time around when they get to the Vietnam War, if that.


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
20

My teacher skipped WW2 so he could cover Vietnam and Watergate.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 3:51 PM
horizontal rule
21

Teenagers are definitely not getting their information from Facebook and Twitter. Those are old-people platforms.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 3:51 PM
horizontal rule
22

How do you get information from Snapchat?


Posted by: foolishmortal | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 4:21 PM
horizontal rule
23

I leaned what a bird with a human penis looks like from Tumblr.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 4:44 PM
horizontal rule
24

I mean, it was linked from here, but the link went to Tumblr.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 5:25 PM
horizontal rule
25

21: Instagram? Am I one of the cool kids finally?


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 5:33 PM
horizontal rule
26

21: Instagram? Am I one of the cool kids finally?


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 5:33 PM
horizontal rule
27

25,26: Sorry. I'm very excited.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
28

Because of all the swimsuit models?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 6:18 PM
horizontal rule
29

Yeah, Instagram, Tumblr, Snapchat seem to be the platforms of choice for the youngs. Not to say that they're necessarily any better as sources of information than Facebook and Twitter, but then again that's a low bar.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 6:31 PM
horizontal rule
30

Huh, I'm surprised. I assumed Insta/Snapchat would have been superseded by something I don't even know by name.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 6:33 PM
horizontal rule
31

I mean, maybe it has been. I'm not super in touch with teen culture either.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 6:39 PM
horizontal rule
32

I thought the kids were learning their politics on Youtube,


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 6:55 PM
horizontal rule
33

I guess I'm about to have a young people in the house. He now wears the same size shoe as me and is about to go to his first dance.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 7:13 PM
horizontal rule
34

33: Congratulations, Moby!


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 7:25 PM
horizontal rule
35

In class today to make a point about the dissociation of reward and pleasure systems I asked my college students what social media they used and I got Twitter back.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 7:31 PM
horizontal rule
36

34: I'm just old. Not sure what the accomplishment is.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 7:36 PM
horizontal rule
37

What is the point about the dissociation of reward and pleasure systems? You used to have to work hard for a rewarding meal and now there's a Wendy's down the block?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 8:09 PM
horizontal rule
38

13: if people 18-29 acted like people 50-70 at the polls, there would never be any election judges ever. I never had a single problem with any voter under 40, but something about voting seems to turn them into monsters like in "Clash of the Titans".


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
39

Them being oldsters.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
40

I was explaining that there is a dissociation between something being rewarding and motivating and something being pleasurable, and dopamine mediates the first experience and endogenous opioids mediate the second. And so I asked if anyone had ever had the experience of checking social media even if they were absolutely not enjoying it anymore, but still found something reinforcing about clicking and seeing new information and images, an experience they immediately recognized.


Posted by: Tia | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 8:27 PM
horizontal rule
41

I suppose if you read a wide variety of content and stay away from Twittare and Facebork

I know unfogged is one of the leading places for people to stay twitter is all stupid, but a lot depends on how you use it. I get more information on twitter that I can use to evaluate the news I get from twitter than I ever got from tv news about tv news. Or even from the newspaper about the newspaper. I've shut off the main sources of shit links by skipping retweets and reply thread rabbit holes.

Before I quit Facebook I got a whole bunch of shit links from people sharing dubious sources and it got tiring to have to keep marking some source as "don't show me this again."

I applied a similar approach to cable news but this led to just not watching it. I'd probably still watch Maddow, I guess.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 9:20 PM
horizontal rule
42

I did feel more informed when I read blogs, but then all those bloggers went to twitter.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 9:23 PM
horizontal rule
43

Cable news is where you get stories where they talk to a "small town mayor" and imply that he's just some common guy and then you have to go to the internet to discover that he's the mayor of an affluent suburb of a major municipality and that he's on the short list of people likely to become the next member of the House of Representatives for his district after the long time incumbent retires.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 10-25-18 9:27 PM
horizontal rule
44

42: Yeah, as much as I've been resisting Twitter I find I'm spending more and more time reading it just because that's where a lot of the people writing stuff I want to read are these days. I probably will give in and sign up for it sometime soon.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 12:07 AM
horizontal rule
45

I find Facebook interesting as a way of tracking which of my supposed friends* is sharing misinformation. Brexit has been very revealing that way. I know at least one person of whom I am absolutely 100% certain they are deliberately sharing false information with malice aforethought.

Also people like AWB and some others (who are also here) who post insightful things.

* people I know through activities like music, or work. Not real life actual friends.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 3:16 AM
horizontal rule
46

I like FB in part because if you friend/follow journalists that you like, they'll let you know when they write interesting things, and because the crossover group from here shares much more interesting things than I get from people I know IRL. (Or often the same things, just a week to a year sooner.) My feed is mostly not poisoned by Republicans and people who I loathe.

I dislike it for a million reasons, but the above are the good points. Plus I like photos of kids and kitties.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 3:28 AM
horizontal rule
47

40: Been there.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 4:35 AM
horizontal rule
48

Young people at Starbucks only screw up my breakfast when I order oatmeal, I think because they aren't familiar with foods old people eat so they can have a nice crap.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 5:23 AM
horizontal rule
49

True. I have no intuitive sense of the value of manure.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 5:43 AM
horizontal rule
50

You'll learn.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 5:51 AM
horizontal rule
51

I don't think I'll survive the fall of the cities, tbh.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 5:56 AM
horizontal rule
52

21. Teenagers are definitely not getting their information from Facebook and Twitter. Those are old-people platforms.

Exactly, and "millennials" aren't going there either. That's how they avoid the most toxic posts.

The rule of thumb is, if your mom is on it, you aren't. They have FB accounts but don't use them that much. At least that's what I'm told by millennials I know (anecdote != data, of course). Snapchat and Instagram are alleged to be popular. Of course they might be lying, as I am Not One of Them.


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 5:59 AM
horizontal rule
53

||
Is it just me, or does Shinzo Abe look like a lot like a sleepy koala?
|>


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 5:59 AM
horizontal rule
54

My mom's only news source is the daily newsletter from the assisted living place.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 6:05 AM
horizontal rule
55

When Boomers were the people with a parent to care for as well as a child to raise, it was all over the news like it was a national issue of great importance. Now that the Boomers are doing neither, it's just a personal problem.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 6:07 AM
horizontal rule
56

I did a comparison using Google Images and I think it's just you. Sleepy koalas are adorable!


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 7:07 AM
horizontal rule
57

56: Sorry, again! That comment was supposed to start "53:"


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
58

Shinzo is too adorable. He's got the sleepy eyes thing going.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
59

It's certainly possible for young people's social media to fool young people into believing misinformation. The Brazilian fascists promising to replace democracy with a military dictatorship are being voted in by lots of young people who are overwhelmed by lies on Whatsapp.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 7:49 AM
horizontal rule
60

New question: What is going on with the Avenatti saga? Apparently that Kavanaugh statement from the third woman, which made us say "This sounds implausible, but she's a government employee and it's a sworn statement, so it shouldn't be dismissed", was in fact full of lies and he was pretending two different women were the same woman?

Also, had anyone heard of Avenatti before he rocketed to fame as Stormy Daniels's lawyer? Now people are saying "Uhhh if anyone is surprised in 2018 that Avenatti is a weird liar, apparently they haven't been paying attention." Paying attention to what? The California State Bar Association?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 7:57 AM
horizontal rule
61

||

On FB, an acquaintance's house was broken into and invaded, and the only thing taken was what they probably thought was a gun, but was actually a bassoon. They're very upset.

|>


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 8:01 AM
horizontal rule
62

The main thing anyone appreciated about Avenatti was he seemed to be as good at gaming the media as Trump's people, getting perpetual drip-drip coverage, getting in their OODA loop. It's starting to seem like he falls flat in most other competency areas, including being an actual lawyer.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 8:07 AM
horizontal rule
63

54: My mother likes to have the TV on, but is gradually losing the ability to use the remote. I suspect this may be why many elders leave Fox News on for hours and hours. Thankfully, my mom sitkcs with MSNBC, so her political views match Rachel Maddow's.


Posted by: unimaginative | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 8:08 AM
horizontal rule
64

Or they thought it was a bassoon, which are really expensive. Sorry for your friend.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
65

Not to blame the victim, but are you sure it wasn't an inside job done by a non Bassoonist.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
66

64/65: It's possible. It definitely seemed targeted.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
67

Ask if they practice often and how far away the nearest neighbor is.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:14 AM
horizontal rule
68

64b is probably right. I just googled and the cheap ones are $2,500.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
69

My new Canadian-crime job is Bassoon Fence.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:23 AM
horizontal rule
70

Canadian crime-job?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
71

OR...
Is your friend the first bassoonist? What do you know about the second bassoonist? Ever seen them lurking around the auditorium wings while the first bassoonist practices, vowing to take the first chair at all costs?


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
72

Bassoon fence and Bassoonist finger-breaker.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
73

I have a rush project going, so naturally I'm having trouble looking away. Rumors as of now: they got Florida Man with DNA because he licked the stamps; he's a convicted felon and a registered voter in Florida. Waiting to hear if he voted in 2016.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
74

sorry, wrong thread!


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
75

45,46: There are a bunch of people I miss seeing on Facebook, like AWB, but my overall Facebook experience was getting worse and worse. Like, there were people who no matter how much I wanted to see all of their posts, it just wouldn't show me that. Oddly, most of the misinformation I saw was on the leftish side, which in some way made it more of a time sink for me to investigate whether it was real and possibly worth sharing.

For following people not on my friends list, like journalists, I was already on twitter for that when Facebook added the feature so I never started.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
76

Plus I like photos of kids and kitties.

Oh, I do too. I see myself as a "dog person," not a "cat person," but I honestly think FB has made me more appreciative of cats and their people.

I don't like the abused puppy stuff, though. A few of my aunts and cousins are very energetic in their promotion of harrowing (though ultimately heroic) tales of horrifically abused little dogs who pluckily, and against all odds, manage to pull through, and who then find their "forever homes" in a happily-ever-after... Makes me want to block those aunts and those cousins, but I cannot/dare not, because, you know, family.

My 17-year old son tells me that FB is for "seniors."


Posted by: Just Plain Jane | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 7:43 PM
horizontal rule
77

I've mostly stopped reading Facebook although I still post there since my older relatives see things that way. But it's desperately trying to get me to read more often, I've started getting notifications like "X added a movie to his timeline" where X is someone I haven't interacted with in 8 years. No matter how hard I try to turn off these notifications they still show up.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 10-26-18 7:51 PM
horizontal rule
78

They come back after updates, I think.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-27-18 3:15 AM
horizontal rule
79

There's a bunch of old, slow, white people in the airport and I'm having trouble not yelling at them for being slow while looking like a Trump voter. Maybe it's just too early or maybe it's wrong to keep your bins the long way on the conveyor and block out everyone else.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-27-18 3:17 AM
horizontal rule
80

They aren't like elderly old, just ten years older than me old.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 10-27-18 3:18 AM
horizontal rule
81

I've wanted to yell at slow old people that are ten years younger than me.


Posted by: Out West | Link to this comment | 10-27-18 6:56 PM
horizontal rule
82

Ah, but you were so much older ten years ago. You're younger than that now.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10-27-18 7:21 PM
horizontal rule
83

Chances are, the old, slow, white people of Missouri could use some yelling at. Especially as my parents are out of town.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 10-27-18 7:29 PM
horizontal rule