Re: All Scoot Scoot God Damn

1

You didn't mention my biggest concern: parking like assholes. But here we have the bigger kind you can sit on. Also, I haven't seen many lately.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
2

Tiny wheels and 15 mph says jaw breaking face plants to me, but let's see.


Posted by: Charlie W | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
3

Sooner or later, some little old lady (or man) will get hit by one of these fuckers. They invariably use the sidewalks and make turns without slowing to the required crawl. I saw a scooter with a couple of young'uns turn a corner downtown and almost take out a pedestrian walking toward them (neither could see the other until the scooter turned the corner). Damn, pissed me off so much.

I called up my supervisor and noted that these scooter companies should provide simple apps for pedestrians that allow a pedestrian who sees a violation of conduct rules/laws, to mash a big button and have the app figure out which scooter it was, and hence which user it was, who committed the infraction. With an automatic and mandatory report to law enforcement.

The alternative is vandalism (which is easy -- the wires are just laying out there, asking to be cut).

Somebody's gonna get badly hurt by these fuckers.


Posted by: Chet Murthy | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:33 AM
horizontal rule
4

Have we not talked about this?

* Yes, some people are using them irresponsibly / dangerously.
* Helmets are required by law (at least in my state, probably most) and the apps also require you to show photo evidence of correct parking, so enforcement is within our grasp, if not yet much evidenced.
* Yes, fun as hell.
* Standing rigid on them feels very inflexible / vulnerable to bumps. We might end up collectively deciding all their benefits are better afforded by battery-boost bikes.
* Originally they could go up to 20mph on straightaways. Now they seem to have speed limiters that cut them off around 15mph, as is their legal maximum. That's more appropriate.
* Overall I'm pro everything that might reduce or give alternatives to cars. An urban street environment that is human-scale, accommodating pedestrians and bicyclists as much as or more than cars, will also be a good environment for electric vehicles. So I want them regulated and advanced.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
5

3: The contracts my city is putting in place will have such a citywide reporting mechanism (not requiring people to download the app).


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
6

2: A September 24 headline from the Washington Post:

Hospital ER reports 161 percent spike in visits involving electric scooters

If only electric scooters has been a thing back when Action Park was still a going concern. just think of the possibilities...


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
7

3.3 I saw a story in Slate recently about how a lot of scooters are getting tossed in lakes and such.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:36 AM
horizontal rule
8

Come to think of it, has electric scooter jousting started trending yet?


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
9

Hey, I was just bitching about that two days ago on a DC forum. As a biker I think I've always been a bit more careful than average, and only more so since my accident in 2017. I'm not sure how proud of that I should feel, because careful != law-abiding, and regardless of either concern there's always someone complaining about bikers. If I were to draw a Venn diagram of actions a biker can take, with circles for legal actions, safe actions, and actions unlikely to piss anyone off, there would probably be no point at all where all three circles overlapped.

And to get back on topic, I may look down on other bikers who don't measure up to my standards, and be annoyed or scared by drivers who don't, but I loathe these new scooter riders. The worst or both worlds. I think I've literally never seen one with a helmet.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:41 AM
horizontal rule
10

The roads commissioner achieves power when the lady in the lake rises from the water with a drowned electric scooter to bestow.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
11

8 let's get it trending


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
12

I keep expecting the people who skateboard in the street to die, bit so far they have not.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
13

Overall I'm pro everything that might reduce or give alternatives to cars. An urban street environment that is human-scale, accommodating pedestrians and bicyclists as much as or more than cars, will also be a good environment for electric vehicles. So I want them regulated and advanced.

I was speculating recently that electric scooters are serving the function that Segway wanted fill and, if that's true, it's a classic example of disruption in which the smaller, cheaper, less-featured version ends up making a much greater impact than the expensive, full-featured predecessor (and I presume that the decline in battery weight/prices is a big reason why electric scooters are practical now).


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
14

In addition to vandalism, lake-throwing, etc. when a bank of scooters is all parked together, they can be dominoed. I'm seeing this so frequently I suspect some people are just pushing them over reflexively by now. (Forget that that makes them even more of a nuisance to wheelchair users etc...)


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:53 AM
horizontal rule
15

I saw two teens, one on a scooter, one on a skateboard, arms linked so the former was pulling the latter along. It was disgustingly cute.

(I have also seen someone riding two at once, one under each foot. Less cute, more baffling, I guess showboating.)


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
16

Right next to this post in my RSS feed: Streetsblog, We Can't Stop Global Warming Without Reducing Driving.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
17

The problem with reducing driving us that every car you take off the road makes it faster for all the other cars to get where they want to go. Unless you toss cars in lakes.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
18

We might end up collectively deciding all their benefits are better afforded by battery-boost bikes.

This is an interesting thought; I hope it's where we end up. I think part of my problem with taking the scooters seriously as a "last-mile solution" is purely aesthetic: people on scooters look too wobbly.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:16 AM
horizontal rule
19

Maybe they could rent me a Spanx before I ride?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:18 AM
horizontal rule
20

Wobbly, Mobes. Not jiggly.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:24 AM
horizontal rule
21

I have been lifting.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:27 AM
horizontal rule
22

6: Hospital ER reports 161 percent spike in visits involving electric scooters

Not terribly meaningful in a time period where scooter use spiked by more than 161%.


Posted by: unimaginative | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:32 AM
horizontal rule
23

22: I'd have thought a lot of ER visits involved ambulances.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:35 AM
horizontal rule
24

With American health care coverage, that's risky because who knows what it will cost.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:37 AM
horizontal rule
25

The scooter companies are big customers of ours at work so I want them to please not all go out of business too quickly.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
26

25: Two words: scooter jousting.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
27

I called up my supervisor and noted that these scooter companies should provide simple apps for pedestrians that allow a pedestrian who sees a violation of conduct rules/laws, to mash a big button and have the app figure out which scooter it was, and hence which user it was, who committed the infraction.

My general reaction to seeing young people doing something new is to demand a better and easier way for me to harass them anonymously via social media. That's why I launched Beardr, the app that geotags people with annoying facial hair and prompts users to form flash mobs to scream abuse at them.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:48 AM
horizontal rule
28

1: No one else seems to be doing the Vespa-like ones in Pittsburgh. You haven't seen any recently because they've taken their fleet off the road for the winter. Supposedly. I couldn't get up the courage to try one when they were out, but maybe this spring. (Or maybe not--I got into a car accident on the interstate over the weekend, no one was hurt but I'm a bit skittish of on-road transportation modalities right now.)


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
29

Sorry to hear that. Accidents always leave me with residual nerves too.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
30

Just last week the Ford-branded docked bikeshare in the Bay added electric-boost bikes. They are really fun, better than when I owned one such bike a few years ago.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
31

They make people look silly but that's not my prob - so long as they stay of the sidewalks I'm with minivet. Happy to share bike lane with them, but at least in SF nothing beats an electric assist bike to make the city wonderfully accessible without a car. Sob sob sob at some point I'll be back on my bike with functioning lungs.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 12:19 PM
horizontal rule
32

31
They make people look silly but that's not my prob - so long as they stay of the sidewalks I'm with minivet.

Reminds me of my comment. In 90 percent of DC, it's legal to bike either on the street or on the sidewalk. There is nowhere that we're required to be on the sidewalk, and in the central business district, it's actually illegal to be. And yet, within that district, there are lots of places where biking in the street would be wildly unsafe. Lanes merging or becoming turn-only with little warning, etc. Car accidents in those places are probably relatively rare because drivers are on the lookout for each other, and when accidents happen it's just a fender-bender because speeds are low during rush hour. But every time I biked on the streets in those places I was sure I'd be creamed. So I stopped, and either started avoiding those places or biked on the sidewalk. Besides that, a lot of people seem annoyed at bikers for reasons that have nothing to do with either safety or legality. Online a lot of people hate bikers on the sidewalk, and when actually biking a lot of drivers seem to have it in for me.

As for scooters in the bike lanes, that doesn't bug me as long as they're going in the correct fucking direction because it sure as fuck bugs me if they aren't. (In fairness, I've seen bikers do the same thing at times.)

At this point I'm verbalizing arguments I have with myself every night while commuting, can you tell?


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
33

Comme ca: https://www.wibc.com/news/local-news/man-injured-while-riding-bird-scooter

I wish I had better news. The basic set up of these is wrong; roads are not smooth enough for them.


Posted by: Charlie W | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 1:27 PM
horizontal rule
34

I'm sort of reflexively anti-anti-scooter. Basically all the criticisms are even more true of cars, especially the early days of car. Annoying parking? Well if we just gave them like two car parking spots per block it wouldn't be a problem. Killing pedestrians? Again cars! Maybe scooters will become popular enough that cars will get kicked off some streets, and that'd be a victory for everyone in every way.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 1:34 PM
horizontal rule
35

This topic is making me feel like a country mouse.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 3:33 PM
horizontal rule
36

Here's someone actually trying to marshal available data to figure out if scooters are more dangerous than other vehicles. Answer: insufficient information, but the anecdata is fairly worrying.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 3:44 PM
horizontal rule
37

35: Wait till we get to Schnäppsenhösen.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
38

I'm sure cars were more dangerous before we redesigned our cities for them.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:00 PM
horizontal rule
39

If people ride scooters on the sidewalk, they might hit one of the cars parked there.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:02 PM
horizontal rule
40

I am all for crowding out cars! Welcome to the bike lane my crazy wobbly scooter friends, just don't flop over onto me. And stay off the sidewalks.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:06 PM
horizontal rule
41

I kicked a car once. And slapped one twice.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:16 PM
horizontal rule
42

Pro-tip: If you never go to therapy, no therapist can point out healthy ways of dealing with conflict.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:19 PM
horizontal rule
43

38: cars are still incredibly dangerous!


Posted by: Charlie W | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:23 PM
horizontal rule
44

ajay @ 27:

My general reaction to seeing young people doing something new is to demand a better and easier way for me to harass them anonymously via social media.

Me, I think old people shouldn't walk in crosswalks, I mean, what if a biker wanted to get thru, and he's using one of those newfangled apps that track your speed, and he's tryin' to beat the record, maaaan, and hits one of those obstructing old people. I mean, is that even a CRIME? Rilly!

These two idiots were riding on the sidewalk, on a busy street downtown, and almost hit somebody as they rounded a corner at speed. It's not "something new". It's a safety hazard. And again: just to be clear: this shit keeps on going, we won't just be carrying them over to the street to wedge underneath cars, or planting them ass-end-down in trashcans. We'll be vandalizing them. These companies need to make sure their businesses operate *safely*.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:52 PM
horizontal rule
45

You're going to vandalize scooters to stop cyclists from injuring pedestrians?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 4:55 PM
horizontal rule
46

Uh, I thought the sarcasm was obvious.

"Young people trying something new" is not what happened in that linked-to story. What happened was an uncaring cyclist who was trying for a new Strava record on a segment, and rode at a (71-year-old) pedestrian in a crosswalk (hence, full right-of-way) with depraved indifference. And Strava made this more likely.

In a similar fashion, these scooters, ridden on the *sidewalk* are dangers to pedestrians. B/c a pedestrian cannot see them coming, and they come at high speed. Oh and just to be clear, there's no problem with them operating in bike lanes (and following the laws): pedestrians know to look for them there, etc, etc, etc.

Just to be clear, I have the same problem with bikers riding on sidewalks. I saw a young man tearing ass (really fast, out of the saddle, legs pumping) up the esplanade at the Embarcadero in SF, and hit a poor dog; the dog had no idea which way the guy was going and tried to dodge several directions, before getting hit. The guy didn't even stop. Didn't. Even. Stop. I cringe to think if that had been a human.

If something isn't done to stop scooters on the *sidewalks* by our forces of peace and order, then something *will* be done, is all I'm saying. I'm a law-abiding person: Every time I see an incident of the sort I described, I call the city to register a complaint. I call my supervisor (city legislators) to ask them to do something about it. I have no problem with people using "new toys" as long as they follow the laws. Scooters are illegal on sidewalks.


Posted by: Chetan Murthy | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 5:11 PM
horizontal rule
47

Sometimes people enjoy vandalism enough that they don't worry about the reasons. We've all been there.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 5:13 PM
horizontal rule
48

I read somewhere or other that in enlightened topless Scandinavia, the solution is to have lanes in the streets with designated speeds, and the transport method doesn't matter. So if you're going 10mph, you stay in the 10 mph lane and no one cares how. The innermost lanes have the highest speeds.

My Bay Area friends love the scooters, say they are fun as can be and that for sure, they are incredibly convenient and the high school boys riding them stupidly will get killed or get someone else killed. I've ridden the JUMP bikes and those are super fun. From what I can tell, they've become a recreation option in addition to a transportation option.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 5:17 PM
horizontal rule
49

"I have the same problem with bikers riding on sidewalks." This! Get into the street, or take the bus. And absolutely we need safer and vastly expanded bike infrastructure.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 5:24 PM
horizontal rule
50

It looks like that cyclist received what was probably too lenient a sentence due to the same vehicular manslaughter laws that also protect drivers who kill. (TLDR: unless malice aforethought is proved, which usually means being under the influence of something, it's a misdemeanor.)


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 5:28 PM
horizontal rule
51

I hate cyclists buzzing pedestrians and blowing through intersections too. Urban cycling gives one justified paranoia, but that can turn into a "we can do no wrong" complex when what's needed is for everyone to remember "big yields to small".


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 5:31 PM
horizontal rule
52

Moby: something else. It isn't like I go up to every person with a scooter, every person riding their bike, every person using a "hoverboard" on the sidewalk, and start haranguing them to get into the street. I'm -specifically- angered by big companies doing this. Because their business model is built around users breaking the laws [without liability to the company], and that's unacceptable. It is -specifcally- the users of those companies' scooters, that I target with my "you do know you're not allowed on the sidewalk with those -- it's illegal, you need to be in the street" harangues.


Posted by: Chetan Murthy | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
53

44. My impression from reading some anti-scooter screeds is that the scooter business model is the scooters pay for themselves after a few weeks, and anything after that is gravy, so the companies aren't overly concerned about vandalism. One issue some cities have avoided is that if you allow in lots of scooter companies they of course flood the zone to maximize their scooters' visibility. One solution is to require they be returned to a rack rather than just abandoned; SF allowed them to be abandoned at first, but I think they are switching and also limited the number of licensed companies.

48. Most of the anti-scooter stuff I've seen comes from SF and the Bay Area in general. I guess opinion is divided on them. They were a test bed (by which I mean the companies just started dumping them everywhere without even asking permission), so it's not surprising things were chaotic. Maybe it's better now. I think DC has two licensed companies and requires return to a rack.


Posted by: DaveLMA | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:00 PM
horizontal rule
54

The ones I don't get are electric skateboards controlled by a remote fob held in the hand. Like, do they have brakes? How much experience skateboarding do you need to use one of those?
My problem as a frequent biker is pedestrians who cross when I have a green light but they don't consider a bike to be worth waiting for a walk sign. If the light is green I need to go at a normal speed to prevent being passed then right hooked by a car. I don't care if they cross when they don't have a walk sign but at least yield to the person with a green.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
55

Some of the locals here manage to not consider a car worth waiting for a walk sign to stop for. It's really impressive, unless you happen to be the person they decided to walk in front of while you drive.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:24 PM
horizontal rule
56

Moby: Some of the locals here manage to not consider a car worth waiting for a walk sign to stop for.

In both Massachusetts and California, pedestrians in a crosswalk have the right-of-way (technically, it's "at an intersection" in CA). Period. I remember the Boston po-po would run plainclothes officers on the crosswalk in front of Bulfinch's tavern on the public garden, with a car posted a block down, to write tickets for any cars that didn't yield right-of-way. And saw it myself in Cambridge's Central Square.


Posted by: Chetan Murthy | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:37 PM
horizontal rule
57

I'm talking about people who cross in the middle of the block. I mean, I do it all the time, but I wait until I have space and I move quickly. The elderly Jewish people around here will do it even when they need a walker.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:41 PM
horizontal rule
58

56- That's true for an unsignaled crosswall, but you're saying at a crosswalk where I have a green light and they have a red hand, that a pedestrian still has the right to cross and I have to stop? I find that hard to believe, especially because if all pedestrians acted like that it would be total chaos. You could never approach an intersection at more than 5mph, when by car or bike.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:46 PM
horizontal rule
59

When = whether


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:46 PM
horizontal rule
60

I used to spend a lot of energy stewing over all the reckless bicyclists around here, wrecking things for the rest of us. Then I realized, have I sublimated my terror of cars and redirected it at the only behavior I feel some control over? Is this the white guy equivalent of respectability politics? I really did sometimes say to myself "Bikes might get treated better if they behaved better."


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:47 PM
horizontal rule
61

Honestly, I used to complain about reckless bikes, but they put in a bunch of bike lanes near my office and it really worked great.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 6:48 PM
horizontal rule
62

SP @ 58: Link to summary of state laws: http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/pedestrian-crossing-50-state-summary.aspx

In many states (and for sure in MA, CA) yeah, a pedestrian -always- has right-of-way at a marked crosswalk, whether controlled or uncontrolled. And sure, you might think that this results in traffic slowing to a crawl, but it doesn't. In fact, at least in California, it results in drivers behaving courteously to pedestrians. [I've forgotten what it felt like in MA, but I never drove there either.] I noticed it in 1987 when I came to visit a friend working in Palo Alto (having grown up in Texas): drivers would stop when was just at the corner, about to step into the intersection. It totally baffled me! But it was great! And now living here, as a driver, I'm always careful and aware, and that means, yeah, I don't drive like a bat out of hell. That's all to the good. B/c it means that pedestrians, and esp. old folks with walkers, can actually get around. Ditto small children.


Posted by: Chetan Murthy | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 7:00 PM
horizontal rule
63

Moby:

The elderly Jewish people around here will do it even when they need a walker.

I take public transit all the time. I see older folks take the bus a single block, even on a pretty-flat-ish street. Maybe the "when they need a walker" is a clue? That they can't walk long distances, and walking down to the end of the block, crossing, walking back, is a big deal? Everybody gets old, eventually. Everybody wants to stay ambulatory as long as possible. Drivers needs to understand that for them, waiting a little is a matter of -convenience-. For pedestrians, esp. the kind you cite, it's a matter of whether they'll be able to get around at all, or not.


Posted by: Chetan Murthy | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 7:04 PM
horizontal rule
64

I'm admiring their trust of human nature.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 7:06 PM
horizontal rule
65

I feel like Minivet@60 is onto something. Drivers kick down at pedestrians and cyclists. But they never kick at other drivers. When four cars approach a 4-way stop, nobody barrells thru, expecting the others to stop. Instead, they all stop, and then there's this dance of figuring out who's gonna go first. And after that, the dance repeats -- it's not like once the first car thru is decided, everything else goes by *lockstep*.

Somehow, the fact that if you don't actually negotiate with the other parties, you'll end up on the receiving end of a 2-4-ton death machine, makes everybody *courteous* in a way they don't behave towards pedestrians or cyclists.


Posted by: Chetan Murthy | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 7:17 PM
horizontal rule
66

51. Round here, bikes yield to horses as well.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:15 PM
horizontal rule
67

pushing them over reflexively

I propose subsidized urban pastures to provide a distraction.


Posted by: Kreskin | Link to this comment | 12-19-18 11:16 PM
horizontal rule
68

In many states (and for sure in MA, CA) yeah, a pedestrian -always- has right-of-way at a marked crosswalk, whether controlled or uncontrolled.

That sounded implausible enough to check, and it doesn't appear to be true in MA. M.G.L. 89.11: "When traffic control signals are not in place or not in operation the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right of way, slowing down or stopping if need be so to yield, to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a crosswalk marked in accordance with standards established by the department of highways if the pedestrian is on that half of the traveled part of the way on which the vehicle is traveling or if the pedestrian approaches from the opposite half of the traveled part of the way to within 10 feet of that half of the traveled part of the way on which said vehicle is traveling."

It does appear to be more or less true in CA (CA Vehicle Code 21950), though with the important qualification that pedestrians have a duty not to leave the curb in a way that would hazardously put them in the path of a nearby vehicle. Who knows how that's applied in practice, but I'd read it to mean that cars don't have to approach all intersections at 5 mph just in case a pedestrian decides to exercise their right of way by suddenly dashing into the road, but would have to do so if a pedestrian is stepping into the road far enough ahead, even if the car has the green.


Posted by: potchkeh | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 6:56 AM
horizontal rule
69

I presume that the decline in battery weight/prices is a big reason why electric scooters are practical now

Also practical now are vaping and drones. Its amazing how battery tech has created whole classes of shit we never had before.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
70

Drones have shut down a major airport for the last 24 hours and as with the Chavez strike I am surprised it hasn't happened sooner.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 1:30 PM
horizontal rule
71

I suspect in both cases they had help from humans.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
72

70 It has. I was there for one of those and the delay was a lot longer than the reported 2 hours (coming back from a weekend trip late at night and had to go to work the next morning too.)


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
73

What this is city really needs is people with more kinetic energy.


Posted by: chris s | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 2:35 PM
horizontal rule
74

||

NMM to Mattis as SecDef. The wheels are really coming off now.


|>


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 4:32 PM
horizontal rule
75

68- aren't there stories about LA cops giving people tickets for even starting to cross when the don't walk has started flashing, never mind when a car has a green?


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 4:47 PM
horizontal rule
76

There are a million stories in the naked city. Most of them are pretty dull.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 4:51 PM
horizontal rule
77

So did Mattis write that NYT op-ed?


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 4:56 PM
horizontal rule
78

77 Maybe, did you read his letter of resignation?


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 5:00 PM
horizontal rule
79

Not yet. I've only seen it so far linked in formats that there's no way I'd read on a phone.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 5:19 PM
horizontal rule
80

He was careful to mention that the deputy secretary in charge is blocking Trump when he plunges for the button is staying on.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 5:44 PM
horizontal rule
81

77: The question is kind of futile, since we don't know how much the NYT rewrote what it got. That said, I don't think so. The NYT piece is reads like a politician's work and is domestically focused. Mattis talks almost entirely about alliances. They feel entirely different to me.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 6:06 PM
horizontal rule
82

In retrospect, I don't think I read the whole op-ed because so much was bullshit anyway.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 6:08 PM
horizontal rule
83

NYT, Mattis.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 6:16 PM
horizontal rule
84

I've been away from the news most of the day, but saw that there's some kind of rumor that Trump is going to order troops out of Afghanistan. I'm sure it's fake news, because, whoa.

What's amazing is that Trump seems to have decided that he cements a legacy, or insulates himself from removal, by getting out of wars rather than getting in them. I'm sure it's just a blind pig finding an acorn, with acorn defined as an ineffective strategy which nonetheless leads to goals I can get behind. Has he met any Republican senators? (Yes, re Syria I'm conflicted about selling out the Kurds. Again. I'm not conflicted about not getting farm kids from Nebraska killed for nothing.)

I stand by my position that if he enacts single payer universal coverage he gets on Mt Rushmore. Thing is, he won't care, because he'll be gone by then.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 7:04 PM
horizontal rule
85

There's a really fucking stupid version of "All the King's Men" in the administration somewhere.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 7:34 PM
horizontal rule
86

I'm all for getting us out of Afghanistan but how about, you know, getting the Taliban to sign a peace treaty first?


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 8:39 PM
horizontal rule
87

He's going to make them promise not to fly airplanes into buildings with "TRUMP" on the side and call it a win.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 8:48 PM
horizontal rule
88

86: Exactly:

retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal was cited as saying the best the United States could hope for in Afghanistan was to keep a reasonably sized force there and "to muddle along" as best as possible. Some were disappointed with this comment. I would submit that he is both right and that his thought extends to the counter-terrorism mission globally. Which is to say, these are issues without a military solution but for which the United States has largely chosen to apply military means. Until or unless Congress decides to put sizeable amounts of the U.S. budget into addressing the underlying drivers of terrorism abroad, the Defense Department will be stuck
And Afghanistan is not looking good.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 8:53 PM
horizontal rule
89

One of the fucked up things about this is that there have been some significant overtures made to bringing the Taliban to sign such a peace treaty. This is exactly the wrong time to do this in this manner.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 8:54 PM
horizontal rule
90

I mean very recently


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 8:54 PM
horizontal rule
91

Also we have to consider there is now an unimpeded John Bolton presumably trying for war with Iran.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:01 PM
horizontal rule
92

Unless he got fired and I missed it?


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:01 PM
horizontal rule
93

Not that I saw. I would guess he's not a happy man, but if he wanted to influence Trump, he should have had a less stupid mustache.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:05 PM
horizontal rule
94

More optimistically (hahahahahahaha) there's every chance this will just flip back with the next IS attack, or just with best bud MBS freaking out about Turkey.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:21 PM
horizontal rule
95

I think there


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:23 PM
horizontal rule
96

I think there's a good chance he's doing this to get Turkey to back off MBS.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:24 PM
horizontal rule
97

Good point.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:25 PM
horizontal rule
98

I stole it from the internet.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:26 PM
horizontal rule
99

It's going to turn out that America First boils down to ethnic cleansing at home and not giving a fuck abroad.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:26 PM
horizontal rule
100

THERE'S ONLY ONE THING WORSE THAN FIGHTING WITH ALLIES AND THAT'S FIGHTING WITHOUT THEM


Posted by: OPINIONATED WINSTON CHURCHILL | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:29 PM
horizontal rule
101

99: Just like last time.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:30 PM
horizontal rule
102

According to a crossword puzzle clue: allies are "the friend you fight with".


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:32 PM
horizontal rule
103

The second time as farce.


Posted by: Opinionated Karl Marx | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:34 PM
horizontal rule
104

Meanwhile, the "the wall" thing continues to crack me up. "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down wall!"


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:36 PM
horizontal rule
105

I steal everything from the internet. Except stationery. I steal that from work.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:39 PM
horizontal rule
106

Maybe the real "the wall" is all the wall we built along the way.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 9:41 PM
horizontal rule
107

The real wall is in our hearts.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 12-20-18 11:35 PM
horizontal rule
108

Some MAGA guy started a GoFundMe for buliding the wall and it just hit 10 million USD. That's all going right into his pocket. Great grift.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 12:28 AM
horizontal rule
109

Someone actually donated 50,000


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 12:30 AM
horizontal rule
110

GoWallMe
WallStarter
Wallmeon
Wallgress

Wall.org
Wallber
Wallr
Wallyft
Wallbook
Wallter
WallBnB
Wallgle
Wallmblr
Wallizon
Wall-mobile
WallT&T
Wallcast
Wallstr
Wallhub
Wall.io
Wallantir
Wallernews
Wallfeed
Wallington Post
WallTube
Wallazon
Wallspace
Wallple
Wallmail
Wallsapp


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 12:45 AM
horizontal rule
111

I think I'm basically with Minivet here. I'm annoyed by scooters on the sidewalk (just like I'm annoyed when people bike on the sidewalk), but I think this is 90% about insufficient bike-lane infrastructure (+10% kids being stupid assholes). The bottom line is we need to destroy individual car ownership, and reclaim the huge amount of lane given over in our cities to parking, and these scooters honestly seem like a much better last-mile solution than anything else that's ever come along. Compared to bikes, they take up considerably less parking space (which is why I'm annoyed by how much complaining there is about them being left wherever--yes, we need a better system, but FFS, these things take up like 1/3 the cubic volume of a bicycle, and like 1/50th of a car; talk about letting the perfect be the enemy of the SO MUCH BETTER) and there's no need to be fit to use one. (Yes, we can talk about electric-assist bikes, but I don't think they'll ever have as low a barrier to entry as these scooters.)

In my utopia, there's no more on-street car parking, just expensive garages; very low private car ownership; very good heavy-rail and other high-throughput public transit; and (thanks partly to reclaiming space from parking) massive buildout of low-speed dedicated lanes for electric scooters and bikes; plus maybe someday (hey, it's utopia) self-driving cars to pick up the remaining last-mile slack.


Posted by: X. Trapnel | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 3:30 AM
horizontal rule
112

I complain about the occasional double parked delivery truck but holy shit.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 4:29 AM
horizontal rule
113

111.1: We have one of those things already.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 5:36 AM
horizontal rule
114

Does anybody else picture Master (the top half of Master Blaster) shouting "Embargo" at Tina Turner in all the reports of Trump on the coming government shutdown?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 5:47 AM
horizontal rule
115

110: Walgreens tends to throw "Wal-" into its generic product names. My favorite one I've encountered is their version of Claritin, which is Wal-Itin. It's like they were sitting around the table, trying to think of clever plays on the word "Claritin" and then someone said, "Fuck it, who cares, Wal-Itin it is."


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 8:10 AM
horizontal rule
116

Triggered.


Posted by: Opinionated Fortunato | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 8:13 AM
horizontal rule
117

110 Walloon.be


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
118

Probably a really good day for a new "Friday WTF" post.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 8:27 AM
horizontal rule
119

||

GoFundMe for an animatronic RBG doll.

|>


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
120

It's nice to know that it will be seriously overdetermined why I'm nervous and edgy for Christmas.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 12-21-18 11:15 AM
horizontal rule