Re: Guest Post: Instavangelists

1

Does anybody get enough money for a private jet?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 7:58 AM
horizontal rule
2

I get the thing about validation and reassurance. I'm not sure why astrology is still a thing.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
3

Is this something we're supposed to "stan"?

I am with it.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 8:25 AM
horizontal rule
4

The niche for somebody reading chicken livers is wide open.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 8:26 AM
horizontal rule
5

In February Ms. Doyle posted a virtual sermon to her followers on Instagram, encouraging them to "embrace quitting as a spiritual practice."

Until I read the article, I though the sermon was urging them to quit Instagram.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 9:37 AM
horizontal rule
6

Since televangelists on the whole are the sleaziest soul-sucking motherfuckers in the world, the new breed has a low bar to clear to be an "improvement." Also see 1.

I somewhat cringingly recall young sort of traditionally-religious* me (but an older age than makes me comfortable now) earnestly reporting to my mother that I did not think most televangelists were sincere**. She looked at me like a two-headed cow, laughed, and then considered her life choices that led to her raising such a naïve idiot son. But really, should not legit church people set on these mountebanks like a pack of wild dogs? They are utterly corrosive for any legitimate religious belief system. And yet.

*I went through all the motions but from an early age viewed it all as a big wad of stupid bullshit, but allowed that maybe I was not old enough to understand yet (and there were a number of areas where I did come to appreciate things that had previously not made sense to me).

**We lived not too far from a fairly well-known "church," the Cathedral of Tomorrow. It's minister lived in a big mansion with lavish cars quite close to us.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 9:51 AM
horizontal rule
7

But really, should not legit church people set on these mountebanks like a pack of wild dogs?

We live in a celebrity culture. No one cares what some vagrant nobody with, like, 12 scruffy, unemployed layabout friends says.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 10:17 AM
horizontal rule
8

One time on a commuter train I was seated nearby to a douchebag on headset, who was trying to sell a potential client on getting into influencer marketing. I got to hear the whole rundown of how their agency could put together a targeted portfolio of influencers to match the product's demographic needs. It's quite an industry they have going on.


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 10:21 AM
horizontal rule
9

Fishing is a job.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
10

Marketing probably isn't.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
11

"I will make you marketers to affluent, educated women 18-40."


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
12

Do not let your right hand cc your left hand.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 10:34 AM
horizontal rule
13
I want moral authority from someone who isn't shilling a memoir or calling out her enemies on social media for clout
Leigh Stein is the author, most recently, of the novel "Self Care," a satire of the wellness industry and influencer culture.

I think the televangelist hook is not very illuminating. My wife recently read the Doyle on a friend's recommendation, and insofar as it had a salutary message, it sounded to me like permission (and a notional, virtual community) for women to not accept various roles as they were handed to them. Of course it's all wrapped up in incredible self-absorption, but there's a nugget in there that I don't think is really about religion.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
14

Wikipedia tells me Glennon Doyle originally had the same last name as me, but as far as I know we aren't related.


Posted by: Todd | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 11:02 AM
horizontal rule
15

ah, never mind, further googling says it was her married name.


Posted by: Todd | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
16

Were you ever married to her?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 11:05 AM
horizontal rule
17

No.


Posted by: Todd | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 11:29 AM
horizontal rule
18

It was unlikely, but ruling out things clearly is important.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 11:32 AM
horizontal rule
19

I want moral authority from someone who isn't shilling a memoir or calling out her enemies on social media for clout

YOUTH PASTOR KNOWS SOMEONE WHO ISN'T SHILLING A MEMOIR OR CALLING OUT HIS ENEMIES ON SOCIAL MEDIA FOR CLOUT.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 11:54 AM
horizontal rule
20

19 made me look up the priest who taught freshman religion to me. Turns out he retired this past summer because he's really old now.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 12:22 PM
horizontal rule
21

Which is weird because 1985 was only fifteen years ago.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 12:27 PM
horizontal rule
22

13: One of many things that made me leery of recommending this article was the awkward collision of personal commentary and social critique. I don't have any idea who's in the intersection of Doyle et al's millions of followers, in the one circle, and these millennial "leftists" who worship Dolly Parton in the other, but I suspect it's a small number. However, I constantly underestimate the role of religious yearning in human life, so I'll grant her some allowances there.

Also, Flippanter!


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 12:41 PM
horizontal rule
23

One missing piece here, which I think I assimilated into my own worldview without remembering where I read it, can be found in this Tim Wu interview from 2016.

The story of the advertising industry is the story of the co-option of many of religion's best techniques -- primetime rituals, the idea of having people gather around every day or week at a particular time. This is a little like mass insofar as it's time devoted to a common subject every day.
In some ways, the idea of icons or religious iconography translated into the brand movement. The inventor of brand advertising was a devoted Catholic who was very interested in how humans would fixate on brands and come to imbue them with so much meaning.
These early copywriters were often ministers or former ministers who wanted to sell products to people the way they sold religion in church. The idea was that these products would deliver some form of salvation to whatever ails the consumer, and they were quite explicit about this.

Does he discuss this more in the book? Is it bullshit? Claims like this usually are!


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
24

Sayers was both very religious and big at advertising.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-18-21 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
25

Her best known slogan was "Guiness is good for you!", which she came up with in the 1930s and i remember still being used when I was a kid. She came up with a campaign for Guiness that ran for about 40 years around images of toucans: "Guiness is good for you, so think what two can do."
I don't think anybody ever Whiffled, though, which is quite surprising..


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 3:02 AM
horizontal rule
26

Hamm's, because life isn't supposed to be fair.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 5:46 AM
horizontal rule
27

I've seen the Guinness ads with toucans, but never the slogan that made it make sense -- I thought it was just colorful surrealism. Knowing there was a point to them is reassuring.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 5:51 AM
horizontal rule
28

Budweiser, tastes better than it deserves to.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 6:06 AM
horizontal rule
29

I have a beer snob friend who I enjoy scandalizing by saying, "Sometimes a Budweiser is just the right thing."


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 6:20 AM
horizontal rule
30

23. Early US advertising is pretty interesting. Wu's book looks like it has potential, but also Applegate's The Rise of Advertising in the United States which doesn't say much about religion but does go into some detail about PT Barnum and patent medicine. Maybe that predates the "meaningful" brands Wu writes about.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 7:16 AM
horizontal rule
31

Beer snobs are way too into hops.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 7:23 AM
horizontal rule
32

29: One of the greatest posts from the golden age of blogging is dsquared's In Praise of Budweiser. Come for the Slate pitch thesis, stay for the nested footnotes' deep dive into North Wales provincialism.


Posted by: MattD | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 7:35 AM
horizontal rule
33

I've spent a lot of time in places where Budweiser is easily the best beer you can get.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 7:41 AM
horizontal rule
34

32 Beat me to it.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 8:04 AM
horizontal rule
35

I don't remember the last time I drank Budweiser, but my number one beer pet peeve is people who drink PBR (which is terrible) instead of something perfectly fine like Budweiser. I did like Coors (heavy) best among the big macrobrews (though of course the company's politics are problematic).


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 8:27 AM
horizontal rule
36

PBR is undrinkable. Coors isn't sold much around here.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 8:29 AM
horizontal rule
37

I read like half that thread, and no one mentioned the horses.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
38

37: it's in comment 12.


Posted by: chill | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 8:59 AM
horizontal rule
39

ha!


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
40

I agree these kinds of accounts represent something new to think about socially, but I disagree religion is a particularly close comparison. The subculture's relentless positivity and vagueness makes me think it's partially substituting for the role of friend groups - boosting each other up without, necessarily, much philosophical or mission content.

The article doesn't use the term "parasocial" once! Not that that explains everything, but it's a better guide and slot for theorizing.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
41

"Parasocial" sounds like someone who dropped out just before getting the MSW.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
42

A parasocialite is someone who dropped out before getting rich, but wants to cling.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
43

Who called them peer support specialists and not parasocial workers?


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
44

A social worker.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
45

Sometimes a Budweiser is just the right thing. Yes! When you're in the mood where what you really want is to crunch on a mouthful of ice cubes!


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 1:51 PM
horizontal rule
46

31: Exactly! The other way I needle him is by telling him he needs to branch out from IPAs.

36: Also correct!


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 8:34 PM
horizontal rule
47

The biggest local microbrew here at least as the decency to call their most popular beer "Big Hop" so you are warned. It's not bad as far as those things go, but it's an effort to drink more than one. They make a nice lager, but that was never in the bars much. Thanks to covid, they will now bring a case of it to my house. It's in 16 ounce cans and somehow three sixteen ounce cans make me feel more drunk than four 12 ounce cans.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-19-21 8:41 PM
horizontal rule
48

Is it beer snobbery to say that all the American local brews I've tried have been over-hopped. Gusty bus and all, but a great beer IMO carefully balances malt and hops.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 1:08 PM
horizontal rule
49

Sometimes they try to make them taste like a fruit, which is worse.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
50

48: There are some good Belgian-style beers that are made in the US which are not hoppy.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
51

Those are often too malty.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
52

English and Germans, overall, do beer better.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 2:29 PM
horizontal rule
53

Belgians got them both beat


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
54

48 I'm guessing you've never had a glass of Moose Drool.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 2:52 PM
horizontal rule
55

Lots of Belgian beers are frankly bad in a way that even the cheapest British bitter can't manage. Some of the Belgian beers are great, but the overall average isn't great.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
56

I really don't think there's anywhere that compares with Belgium in terms of both how good their best beers are and how many good options you can find at a typical restaurant or bar. I do think many parts of the US (California, Colorado, Michigan) are better than than Germany or the UK. It is true that US beer used to be better before things got too hoppy, but there's still tons of great stuff. The main problem with Germany is that you have such limited options: you're stuck with whatever the local beer is or hefeweizen. The selection of good German beers at a good US bottle shop is better than at almost any German bottle shop. If you're in a region with good beer and drinking stuff on tap, then yes it's great, but it's a real crapshoot. And of course it's utterly impossible to get say Belgian beer in Germany. The UK is great for above average beer at a good price and good ABV in a nice environment, but there's almost nothing that's memorably good.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:32 PM
horizontal rule
57

If it's more than $15 a glass and tastes like medicine and fruit, you've either had Nyquil or a Belgian beer.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
58

Honestly even if you just restrict to beers made in my town of under 100K people, I think they're competitive (and honestly probably better) than beers made in the whole UK.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:37 PM
horizontal rule
59

Germany at least has Schneider Weisse Tap6 Mein Aventinus, which I'd put in the top 10 beers in the world. I literally can't think of a British beer which would make the top 100. That said, I don't think I've had anything from Buxton or Cloudwater, which the internet seems to think are the best.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:47 PM
horizontal rule
60

The thing about the double IPAs and so on is that they're for consuming with overly salted, oily, spicy, excessively rich and unhealthy "American" food such as pizza and burritos and various spicy noodle dishes and the like. If your palate has been ruined by junk food, it's not hard to develop a taste for excessive hops. Personally, I'm okay with the west coast IPA because I don't actually like beer very much, but I don't mind the astringent hop taste.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:55 PM
horizontal rule
61

Now I want chicken wings.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:57 PM
horizontal rule
62

There are pepperoni rolls in the fridge, but that's too much grease for me.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 3:59 PM
horizontal rule
63

I do like fruitier IPAs, so this whole "hazy IPA" thing has been a great development from my point of view.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 4:00 PM
horizontal rule
64

If you're old and cranky, you can say, "I want something that tastes like a normal beer, but better. " It doesn't work, but it's more seemly than shouting, "Why the fuck does this beer taste like cherries?"


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
65

Mobes, just order the Kölsch.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 4:31 PM
horizontal rule
66

There's a Lincoln brewery that made one of those. I think I liked it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 4:38 PM
horizontal rule
67

60 gets it right.
I like some IPAs a lot, including some pretty hoppy ones, but the hoppy ones kill your tastebuds and so they suck as a drink to have with food unless that food is very rich/oily/salty. And I like having beer with food.
Also, I sometimes like to have more than one beer, and most IPAs suck for that, because (1) since they kill your tastebuds you don't taste the 2nd one, and (2) I'm lightweight and many IPAs are 7+% ABV, so the 2nd one gets me way closer to drunk than I'd like.
Basically, the American IPA should be a niche preference ('a good beer to have it you're only having one and aren't eating anything') but is somehow the dominant craft/microbrew style. It's weird.


Posted by: MattD | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 5:33 PM
horizontal rule
68

Beer is like circus peanuts. Unless it's stale, nobody is stopping after one.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 5:51 PM
horizontal rule
69

should be a niche preference [...] but is somehow the dominant

Perhaps a runaway preference, like very long toed shoes, or hoopskirts, or cichlid tails (the last including glued-on plastic ones)?


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 10:54 PM
horizontal rule
70

57: I'm not talking about fruity sour beers, but, like, Ommegang's Hennepin from New York State is a tasty Saison.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 03-21-21 11:21 PM
horizontal rule
71

Oh man, I love those sour beers. I don't see why true beer drinkers would like them, but I think they're delicious.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 6:01 AM
horizontal rule
72

67. I don't understand why American beers are so insanely strong. British beers are generally 3.6 - 5.0 abv. and you expect to drink 4 British pints (80 fl. oz) and still carry on a coherent conversion and walk home in a straight line. You don't drink beer to get drunk. If you want to get drunk you drink shots, or wine at a party. You drink beer to get not quite sober and set the world to rights with your mates.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
73

We use smaller glasses (12 or 16 ounces).


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 1:02 PM
horizontal rule
74

Yes, I know. You end the evening thirsty.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
75

They will give you water if you ask.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 1:20 PM
horizontal rule
76

If you order a whisky and it's not a Friday crush, they'll give you water even if you don't ask.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 1:58 PM
horizontal rule
77

In conclusion, I missing going to bars, but won't be able to even after I get vaccinated because one member of the household is too young to be vaccinated.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
78

You need to drink the better part of a gallon in a single sitting, or else end up thirsty? British people sure are built different.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:12 PM
horizontal rule
79

Here's a question which I've tried to research but keep getting contradictory answers to: Does the effectiveness stat for vaccinations measure protection against infection, or against symptomatic illness? In other words, two weeks post second shot (assuming that eeeevvverrr happens), when I go to Miami Beach and lick all the used margarita glasses at the EDM club, will I have a 5% chance of testing positive, or a 5% chance of developing at least some symptoms of coronavirus?


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
80

Are you licking the inside or outside?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
81

I have a risk calculator that asks which.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:24 PM
horizontal rule
82

I think the effectiveness stats measures the number of infections detected in the treated group as compared to the control group. Some of those detected infections likely include people who were tested despite being asymptomatic, and probably some asymptomatic people in each group weren't detected. So there's not a straightforward answer.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
83

Thank you -- that's unsatisfying but it makes sense.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
84

72 is best criticism of American beer. There truly is a lack of good low alcohol beers. Even "normal" non-IPAs like Boont Amber or Bell's Amber are 5.8%


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in" (9) | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 2:34 PM
horizontal rule
85

back before i became obsessed with swimming in the bay and discovered that no alcohol is a good idea if you want to maximize your time in cold water, i found that when i wanted to drink an ipa bluntly telling bartenders selling 86 gazillion hipster beers on tap i didn't want to be mugged by the hops in my beer usually resulted in something drinkable.

and i thoroughly endorse the too-much-alcohol criticism, yikes it is just heavy and unpleasant (like those CA wines that are only appropriate for consumption with a cigar, if you like to drink jam while puffing on your cigar puke puke pukeity puke imo!). fort point, a local joint, makes nice beers that are on the low end of alcohol for us beers, including some of their ipas.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
86

But the strength of English beers has risen steadily this century. I remember the awe in which we held Fuller's ESB (or "suicide" as we knew it) because it was 5.5 whole % alcohol. Nowadays the off licence across the street hardly sells anything less than 5%.


Posted by: NW | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
87

Agree with 72. There are decent mass produced lagers in Spain where you can get a small glass for a euro and it makes it easy to have a social beer even at lunch without it being "I'm going out drinking." We saw a lot of locals who had a caña for their 10:30am coffee break.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
88

71- this is what my wife (or are we going with spouse or partner as blog standard style now?) is into at the moment and it means she doesn't have to share because I won't drink that bacterial contaminated slime.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 3:09 PM
horizontal rule
89

79, 82: It's also apparently the case that the different manufacturers designed their studies slightly differently in terms of what and how they were measuring, so the efficacy numbers aren't even directly comparable.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
90

I realized I misframed the question in 79: it's not (I think) whether I would have a 5% chance of getting sick or of getting infected, but rather, whether I would have 95% lower chance of one or the other, than if I wasn't vaccinated. But either way, 82 and 89 give me the information I needed, which is that there doesn't seem to be a single clear answer. Thanks.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 3:42 PM
horizontal rule
91

There's a Vox video that does a reasonable job of explaining it and mentions some of the differences in study design and what was being monitored.
The irony is that the vaccines, whatever the differences in mild and asymptomatic cases, seem to be nearly 100% effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths, which means that the Covidiot talking point of "it's just like the flu" would actually be true if they'd get the damn shot.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 3:59 PM
horizontal rule
92

91 is misleading. The studies don't have enough power (ie enough people for enough time) to say a lot about preventing serious illness. In one of the studies no one in the control group was hospitalized! So you could say that whatever placebo they gave was 100% effective at preventing serious illness.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: “Pause endlessly then go in.” (9) | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 4:02 PM
horizontal rule
93

91: How far are you driving to get yours? I am obsessively refreshing CVS and Walgreens and need to figure out when it would be rational to look again. Every now and again Walgreens lies and says shots are available but then says no, they're not when I enter all my info. The other day before Tim was eligible, I saw some in hard-hit neighborhoods. I would feel bad about taking those, and the parking is bad.


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 4:04 PM
horizontal rule
94

That said later data from Israel does show its good at preventing serious disease, but more like 90% effective (ie a tenth of the people hospitalized compared to without vaccination).


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: “Pause endlessly then go in.” (9) | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 4:04 PM
horizontal rule
95

Bring me my meta-analysis hat.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 4:04 PM
horizontal rule
96

45 minutes from home but I was going to go in to work that day and it's an hour from there.
92- I thought that was the interim analysis and the final included hospitalizations in all placebo groups. There was noise today about how there were only 5 serious events in the AZ placebo group but that was partly because it was 2:1 vaccine:placebo sizes.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 4:35 PM
horizontal rule
97

These studies are designed to have enough power to tell if they're working to prevent illness. It'd be wasteful to give them enough power to say something meaningful about much rarer events like hospitalizations, because you'd need to make the study much larger and last much longer, and that would delay them coming to market. By design they can't say much meaningful about preventing serious illness.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: “Pause endlessly then go in.” (9) | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 5:12 PM
horizontal rule
98

65 to the entire beer subthread.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 03-22-21 5:58 PM
horizontal rule
99

95: Bring me my broadsword and clear understanding.


Posted by: Opinionated Ian Anderson | Link to this comment | 03-23-21 1:00 AM
horizontal rule
100

27 hours to vaccine appointment and I'm paranoid that the test I sent in yesterday is going to report positive overnight tonight. I took it because I traveled out of state for the weekend so it was technically required on Sunday even though they lifted that requirement Monday. I had a negative test last Wednesday. I don't have any symptoms, just lingering sore legs from doing more physical activity than I have in a year. I'm trying to decide if it is positive for some reason if I'm just going to lie and get the shot anyway.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 03-23-21 5:43 AM
horizontal rule
101

Twenty, twenty, twenty seven hours to go.
I want to be inoculated.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-23-21 5:54 AM
horizontal rule
102

55
Lots of Belgian beers are frankly bad in a way that even the cheapest British bitter can't manage. Some of the Belgian beers are great, but the overall average isn't great.

I'm late to the thread, but can you unpack this? I've had a few Belgian beers I'd call average or mediocre, like Stella Artois, and several I'd call great, like Chimay or Brugse Zot, but none I'd call "frankly bad". Have I been lucky enough to miss the bad ones? Are our tastes wildly different?


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 03-23-21 6:11 AM
horizontal rule
103

Probably the latter. I like Stella Artois.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 03-23-21 6:13 AM
horizontal rule
104

102: depends if you consider the weird baroque fruit flavours/9.8% knockout drops/stuff left out to go rotten gourmet delights, or récherché oddities. If you don't want muttonberries in your beer, or you want to use brewing techniques less than 2000 years out of date, the field thins out and you get a smaller group of really good beers (although they resemble each other quite a lot) and quite a few very generic boring lagers.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 03-23-21 8:15 AM
horizontal rule
105

Is Chimay the one with the pink elephant? I like the pink elephant drink.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 03-23-21 8:16 AM
horizontal rule