Re: Greetings

1

that is awesome.

I've been working in my current office for about six months, so I'm still establishing a real rapport with my coworkers, but there's one guy at the other end of the office who I immediately fell into the default American-male banter with [hang that participle- i don't feel like rewriting!].

We started out with the standard Chevy Chase/Fletch "Doctor" "Doctor" exchange, but over the course of time it's evolved to now we salute and refer to each other as "Admiral". I may have to draw the line at genuflecting.


Posted by: mike d | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
2

That's not a participle!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
3

fuck. i give up! you're not supposed to end a sentence with "with", and i did. mea maxima culpa!


Posted by: mike d | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
4

That's not a participle, that's my wife!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
5

hanging out there by itself, mike thought that final preposition was a dangling participle .

ben your powers of intimidation are really awe-inspiring. a couple of snarky grammar corrections and people are peeing their pants in anticipation of your arrival. that should serve you well in philosophy or law.


Posted by: cw | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
6

Is your wife a fan of the pre-position?


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
7

Me: I don't need an audience.

Why must you constantly assert your comfort with your alone-ness? Don't give into the fear monster, ogged, there is love and companionship out there for everyone.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
8

Ogged just meant that he doesn't need an audience present to him physically, thereby re-establishing his concord with bloggy catechism, as established in the A-List Bull Nostrum Regnum.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
9

Precisely.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
10

Should have been Regnum Nostrum.

Remember, most a-list bull is no better than a nostrum.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
11

Be it hereby recorded that if I ever see w-lfs-n snarking on sentences ending with prepositions, I will smack him into the middle of next week. It's OK to end a sentence with a preposition. (I don't think w-lfs-n has ever 'corrected' anyone on this or has any inclination to. I just want to state the acceptability of this dramatically.)


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
12

Don't worry, Matt, I'm on the side of the angels.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
13

has any inclination to

...do so.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
14

You want a piece of me, Weiner?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
15

Re #14 -- just change an e to a y and remove the comma ... Does this change the meaning? Or maybe not.


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
16

Re #15.

In a pinch you don't even have to change the e.

And "No, no I do NOT!"


Posted by: Tripp | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 10:58 AM
horizontal rule
17

In a pinch

Or if you're a pirate.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 11:15 AM
horizontal rule
18

Ah good, I vaguely remembered that, b-wo.

Apostropher--I think that the infinitival 'to'--which is what the sentence excerpted in 13 ends with--is not technically a preposition. (Don't start none, won't be none.)


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
19

infinitival 'to'

I'll just be sitting down now. Can I get you anything?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 12:17 PM
horizontal rule
20

Does that exchange someone illustrate the unfogged commenters masochists-posing-as-sadists theory?


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
21

Fuck. Someone=somehow.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
22

Fuck. Someone

Many of us are trying, few succeeding.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
23

Yet another possible motto.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
24

Many of us are trying, few succeeding.

I just may be lining up my options right now ... SCMT, you can get out of bed soon


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 1:58 PM
horizontal rule
25

Sorry, pg, but I'm spoken for.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:00 PM
horizontal rule
26

Wait a second. You announce on my blog, a few weeks before our date, that you're about to get some? Dios mio!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:04 PM
horizontal rule
27

ogged, you're the one who said it must be a sexless marriage. Can't blame a grrrrl for taking care of business.

Nice try, b-wo. Hiding your disappointment that you're not the chosen one ...


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:05 PM
horizontal rule
28

This is twisted and wrong. I can't promise that my post date blogging will correspond in any way to what actually happens on our date.

Oh, by the way, did that "find pg a boy" contest bear fruit?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:11 PM
horizontal rule
29

Fairly standard story so far:

"Boy meets girl on blog. Boy trips (not quite falls) for girl. Girl finds out that she can bench-press boy. Girl gets some elewhere."


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:14 PM
horizontal rule
30

It isn't a done deal yet, ogged ... calm down!

And I thought we were liveblogging the date?

SCMT, I am not a thick woman. I cannot bench-press ogged. The problem is that he cannot bench-press me :)


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
31

Oh ... and re: the contest. Nope. Try again. (You can probably put 2 + 2 together and figure out what 4 is)


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
32

I swear the only person more concerned with my weight is my mother.

Anyway, do you really think that I'd ever get naked in front of someone who has a blog? Good grief.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
33

Oh, I'm supposed to have a clue who you're about to bed? Um, nope...


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
34

Anyway, do you really think that I'd ever get naked in front of someone who has a blog?

You always wear the titanium superhero underwear, eh? Even when you're the only person around? (Since we are currently communicationg on *your* blog)


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
35

I cannot bench-press ogged. The problem is that he cannot bench-press me

I can't imagine a bench would be very comfortable anyway.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
36

Oh, I'm supposed to have a clue who you're about to bed

Ummm, Labs, of course!


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
37

Er, when I put 24, 28, and 31 together it adds up to "It's a girl." But I may be reading that wrong.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:22 PM
horizontal rule
38

Labs! Of course!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
39

You're reading that wrong.

Anyone who has read my blog for ... I guess 4 months or so? ... might be able to figure it out.


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:24 PM
horizontal rule
40

Yes, ogged, Labs. I fell for him after I saw his leathery leathery chair.


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:24 PM
horizontal rule
41

Damn.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
42

Wait, the "boy" then? After that, I'm all out of guesses.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
43

oh, ogged, my sexless marriage husband. you are so smart!


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:31 PM
horizontal rule
44

By the way, don't think I didn't notice that you declined to enter the "find pg a boy" contest.


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:31 PM
horizontal rule
45

Dignity, pg, dignity.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:32 PM
horizontal rule
46

SCMT, I am not a thick woman. I cannot bench-press ogged.

My comment had nothing to do with your weight. My sister, who's a Size 2, might be able to bench press 150 lbs. (I'm tetchy about having my comments on a woman's weight misinterpreted, as an innocent and humorous attempt to justify taking a very attractive woman's dessert once own-goaled me out of any chance at sex).

My personal bet is that PG's arranging comfort sex with the ex, but I haven't read enough of her blog to make a considered guess.


Posted by: SomeCallMeMom | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
47

Wrong again, I see.

(OT: out of curiousity, Ogged, (1) can you tell what browser most people use, and (2) if #1, are most people using IE?)


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:35 PM
horizontal rule
48

PG is totally not into the ex-sex scene. I suppose one might think it is comforting. I think a hug from ex is comforting. Sex would be ... inappropriate.

SCMT, I wasn't taking it wrong. I just couldn't pass the opportunity to bring up the thick woman thing.


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:38 PM
horizontal rule
49

(I'm tetchy about having my comments on a woman's weight misinterpreted, as an innocent and humorous attempt to justify taking a very attractive woman's dessert once own-goaled me out of any chance at sex).

This is truly, truly, hysterical. Was the dessert worth it? Or did you not get any of that either?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
50

Browser stats from March here.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:41 PM
horizontal rule
51

Yes, Tim, please tell the story.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:41 PM
horizontal rule
52

Yes, tell the story!


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:42 PM
horizontal rule
53

That, my dear, is "Day in the Life" stuff. That's why I said that your nude wedding story wouldn't make my top 10. And no, I didn't get the cake. I did get fairly nasty looks from all of the other women at the table, though.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
54

Aw, c'mon, what did you say?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:46 PM
horizontal rule
55

And did you establish whether she got mad because you insulted her weight, or because you tried to take her food?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:48 PM
horizontal rule
56

I must have oversold it, because there's really not much to it. I had been hitting on an attractive woman, and things were, if not encouraging, certainly not discouraging. She was your classic GND attractive: tall, thin, blond, and cute. I innocently suggested that, given her thighs (IIRC), she didn't really need the cake. I assumed, b/c she was pretty, it would be an obvious joke (like calling ogged fat). I was younger and stupider then.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:53 PM
horizontal rule
57

Hahaha!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:54 PM
horizontal rule
58

GND?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:57 PM
horizontal rule
59

GND?

Isn't there some complicated system for hitting on women that involves being insulting in the expectation that they will then fall all over themselves and have sex with you in an effort to gain your good opinion? The words neurolinguistic programming are coming to mind, although it doesn't look as if that can be right. It also doesn't sound like it works, at least not for you.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
60

here


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
61

girl next door


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:00 PM
horizontal rule
62

I assumed "General, non-descript," but goole suggests it's "girl next door"


Posted by: mike d | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:00 PM
horizontal rule
63

Google, obvs.


Posted by: mike d | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
64

Let's see if we can hit 100 explanations!


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
65

gigantic natty dyke?


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:04 PM
horizontal rule
66

Isn't there some complicated system for hitting on women that involves being insulting in the expectation that they will then fall all over themselves and have sex with you in an effort to gain your good opinion?

I thought this was the "junior-high dating system." Also, hitting the girl meant you liked her, right (bring on the wife-beater jokes)?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:06 PM
horizontal rule
67

Well, I don't know about being insulting, but not returning calls/email seems to work.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
68

Also general mindfucking.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 3:56 PM
horizontal rule
69

"I never ask girls out because I don't want to sound like some sexist asshole." (exasperated sigh) "I don't know how you put up with these cretins."


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 4:05 PM
horizontal rule
70

Unfortunately, it works so well that I feel compelled to defend the masculinity of the person I'm thinking of. In fact, I'm sure it's all my fault.

But that's hilarious.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 4:23 PM
horizontal rule
71

"We all prefer a clean break but let's face it, a whimpster breakup can drag on pathetically, for weeks, even months, as he nobly attempts to 'just be friends.' The drunken apologetic phone calls, the Craigslist missed connections, the messages of his burning heartbreak sent through mutual friends. Or, for the most dramatic whimpster effect: he'll write a letter and then wait for it to rain in the middle of the night so he can bring it to you."

Ha ha ha.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 4:26 PM
horizontal rule
72

"I never ask girls out because I don't want to sound like some sexist asshole." (exasperated sigh) "I don't know how you put up with these cretins."

Repeating your links?


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 4:39 PM
horizontal rule
73

You know, half the country's problems could be solved if women would (to quote W. Smith) "give it up, nice and eas-y." (Yes, I took the test. Safely metrosexual.)


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 4:48 PM
horizontal rule
74

Speaking of links, I wouldn't be surprised if someone already linked to this.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 4:52 PM
horizontal rule
75

Yes, eb, I am repeating my links, when appropriate.

You wanna make something of it?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 4:54 PM
horizontal rule
76

Nope, just verifying. It seemed like déjà lu all over again.

But if it bothers you, maybe we'd better step offline and have a little chat.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 5:07 PM
horizontal rule
77

Isn't there some complicated system for hitting on women that involves being insulting in the expectation that they will then fall all over themselves and have sex with you in an effort to gain your good opinion?

LB: The problem with that scenario is that first one would have to find a girl who values one's good opinion...


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 04-26-05 6:08 PM
horizontal rule