Re: Leo

1

He was a drunk driver, a brown liquor drinker, a raunchy song-singer, a loud braggart. In short, he was a classic boor, and we dreaded him.

Brown liquor–drinking is a sign of boorishness?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 5:27 PM
horizontal rule
2

I wondered at that too. Maybe it's indicative within a certain context, so that among cops, plumbers, etc., a brown liquor drinker is usually a certain type?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 5:29 PM
horizontal rule
3

No, of course not. Sorry if it seemed that way. Although I have to say, when I was tending bar, I did have quite a few patrons that got amiable buzzes with beer and wine, but put a few shots of Jack in them and they were leaping across the bar to kick someone's ass. I have no idea why this is true. Some people hold brown liquor just fine. Leo didn't. Obviously.

Thanks for the link. Glad you liked the story, aside from the maligning of brown liquor.


Posted by: flea | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 5:42 PM
horizontal rule
4

This reminds me, I was wondering lately if there has been any scientific work on the different kinds of drunk one enjoys under different forms of alcohol. And, does this have something to do with why wine lacks much of the stigma of other alcohols?


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:06 PM
horizontal rule
5

I've wondered about that myself. Maybe allergies have something to do with. When you get drunk, you're giving yourself alcohol poisoning, to various degrees depending on how much you drink. I wonder if the different ingredients in different alcoholic beverages lead to different behaviors. I know the tannin in red wine causes allergic reactions, headaches and such. Budweiser makes my husband sinus congestion, but he's fine with Guinness. Or maybe it's all psychosomatic.


Posted by: flea | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:13 PM
horizontal rule
6

I wish we had editing capabilities in Comments sections. That was a horribly disjointed comment. I'm sorry.


Posted by: flea | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:16 PM
horizontal rule
7

there is supposedly some ingredient in jagermeister that makes one aggressive, or at least boisterous.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:20 PM
horizontal rule
8

I think wine has just enough alcohol to yield a buzz easily, but not so much to push you right over the edge into true drunkenness.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:27 PM
horizontal rule
9

There's this, which seems quackishly plausible.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:28 PM
horizontal rule
10

8.

Same is true for beer for many people.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
11

Brown liquors, red wine and dark beers contain varying cocktails of congeners, those non-ethyl alcohols that contribute to the nastiness of your hangover. They're present in tiny amounts, but given that some people react badly to even the tiny amount of methanol produced by metabolizing nutrasweet, maybe it's enough to have an effect on behavior. They're all solvents, I guess, but I think some intoxicating solvents are more likely to prompt aggressive behavior than others (e.g. model airplane glue).


Posted by: tom | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:47 PM
horizontal rule
12

Early on in Dharma bums, Kerouac recounts the characteristics of different kinds of drunks. Whisky drunks, vodka drunks. The worst of all, he said, were the wine drunks.

I think alcohol is alcohol and the different reactions depend on social triggers. If you pound miller high life in a frat basement it will lead to a different experience (OK, I think that's revulsion for most unfogged readers) than quaffing wine at a great restaurant.


Posted by: cw | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 6:48 PM
horizontal rule
13

I don't know, cw, I myself feel different depending on the source of my inebriation. But, perhaps we don't need to look past the macho culture of beer. Perhaps wine was the only alocholic drink women were allowed to indluge in? And I suppose it's status as the WWJD(rink) beverage of choice doesn't hurt.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 7:19 PM
horizontal rule
14

For liquor, how much of what survives the distillation process has an effect on your behavior? Or how much of what's picked up in the aging or flavoring process. Those could conceivably affect the experience of being drunk depending on what you drink.

I have personally never noticed much difference, but I also rarely drink very much at a time.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n, sippin' rye | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 7:23 PM
horizontal rule
15

Budweiser makes my husband sinus congestion, but he's fine with Guinness. Or maybe it's all psychosomatic.

What happens if he drinks Pabst? Expression of blood directly from his nipples?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 7:31 PM
horizontal rule
16

Couldn't you have sacrificed honesty for rhyme and written, "sippin' bourbon"?


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 7:42 PM
horizontal rule
17

"w-lfs-n" and "bourbon" don't rhyme.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 7:55 PM
horizontal rule
18

Quick, someone invent boulfson.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 8:01 PM
horizontal rule
19

"What happens if he drinks Pabst? Expression of blood directly from his nipples?"

My God, it's like you've got a hidden camera set up in our bedroom.


Posted by: flea | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 8:01 PM
horizontal rule
20

someone invent boulfson

Tip to inventor: requires lots of beans.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 8:03 PM
horizontal rule
21

The distinction between bourbon and boulfson is twofold: first, bourbon comes from Kentucky; second, boulfson is mellowed in a vat of baked beans before being aged a minimum of two years.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 8:09 PM
horizontal rule
22

Told ya.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
23

Stop oppressing me with your narrow bourgeois notions of rhyme, Ben. Moreover, w-lfs-n Bourbon makes a great product name.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 9:15 PM
horizontal rule
24

Better than "Liquid Banjo"?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 9:26 PM
horizontal rule
25

Ha! Yes. Better even than this.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 9:34 PM
horizontal rule
26

Wow! Triple X and a half!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 9:39 PM
horizontal rule
27

I want some rectum ripper.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 9:52 PM
horizontal rule
28

I have no idea where you could procure that product, or someone willing to simulate its effects.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 10:00 PM
horizontal rule
29

Don't be coy.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 10:11 PM
horizontal rule
30

I once tried some mustard out of a spun aluminum cannister with a death's head on it. Now why did I think that was a good idea?


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 06- 7-05 10:13 PM
horizontal rule
31

"I think wine has just enough alcohol to yield a buzz easily, but not so much to push you right over the edge into true drunkenness."

Hence the term "wino" -- someone who drinks only wine, and is thus not looked down upon.

Kerouac was a sloppy wine drunk.

When my son was in HS I taught him the basic rules of moderate, problem-free drinking. (A felony, I know. Contributing.) But he said that when he went to college, in order to be one of the guys he had to learn stupid drinking.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
32

I'm skeptical of the people claiming a reaction to nutrasweet. I'd sure like to see a double-blind study on that.

Two things I learned in England are to beware of a beer called "Elephant" ans a cider called "Copperhead."

I think maybe hard shots hit pretty hard and skip the warm fuzzy stage and put one right into the kick-ass stage, but it won't last long unless one keeps drinking some.


Posted by: Tripp | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
33

I would claim to have a reaction to nutrasweet. But I haven't double-blinded it.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
34

Hey Weiner, didja hear about this?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 10:17 AM
horizontal rule
35

That reminds me--I need to call the real-estate agent.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 10:52 AM
horizontal rule
36

There's also this.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 11:27 AM
horizontal rule
37

Matt,

Double blind would be interesting. I'm not saying this pertains to you, but I know some of the "Multiple Chemical Sensitivity" sufferers show the same symptoms whether they are exposed to pure water or a supposed allergen.

Luckily they have places like HealthMedDetox to turn to. "This is a regimen of exercise, nutrition, and sauna which has sucessfully treated the chemically sensitive by reducing the body burden of fat stored chemicals."

Come to think of it, that sounds an awful lot like the Scientology detox. Hmmmm.


Posted by: Tripp | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 12:27 PM
horizontal rule
38

Actually, I meant that it makes me spit it out cause it tastes nasty. I could of probably come up with a better link.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
39

it tastes nasty.

Ahhh. I presume you were not weaned on saccharine as I was. Farewell, Tab, I knew thee well.

Why, the merest hint, the tiniest taste of saccharine would make you convinced that aspartame was as tasty as a freshly picked orange, as nourishing as mother's milk, and as refreshing as something that really refreshes you.

Oh, and avoid that healthymed place. Bless their heart, they really are a front for scientology!


Posted by: Tripp | Link to this comment | 06- 8-05 2:58 PM
horizontal rule