Re: Uninformed Speculation

1

Is there a single fact in Roberts' background that would lead you to believe that he isn't conservative? I realize that he hasn't spent much time on the bench, but everything I read suggests that he's as far right as Scalia, only not an asshole.


Posted by: Duvall | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:36 PM
horizontal rule
2

I didn't say he wasn't conservative.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:38 PM
horizontal rule
3

I guess I'd ask the same question -- I don't know much about him, but I don't know anything that places him to the left of any conceivable point on the political spectrum. What do you know that makes you consider him less conservative than some possible alternative?

(There could easily be something, I just don't know what it is.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
4

Dobson's comments, and some from others regarding Bush being a "promise keeper," would seem to indicate that he is conservative enough for the base. What makes you think he's not?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
5

I can't tell you.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:47 PM
horizontal rule
6

I wouldn't put it quite that way. I think the surprising thing is that he isn't as demonstrably, paper-trail conservative (esp. w/r/t Roe) as we expected, regardless of his views. I was thinking we'd get someone with "pro-4-life" tattooed around his navel in gothic script.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:47 PM
horizontal rule
7

Yeah, I've been reading a lot on the guy, and, in a sense, there's not much there. How well do his actions as a lawyer predict his actions as a judge? Not very well, probably. But, like the others above, I'm confused on what you mean when you say he's not conservative enough for Bush's base. Certainly, you can read his profile as anti-environmental, anti-choice, anti-seperation of church and state. What more do they want? A more thorough background in these things is possible, true.

All day yesterday I was pondering what kind of judge Bush would nominate. Was he more afraid of losing the christian right, or the "country club republicans." Is he more crafty than I expected? Has he found a judge who both sides can read their views into?


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:47 PM
horizontal rule
8

From Hullabaloo, Digby's Blog:


In case anyone is wondering if Roberts really is a partisan hack or not, Jeffrey Toobin's book "Too Close To Call" sheds some light on that subject:

The president's first two nominations to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia curcuit --- generally regarded as the stepping-stone to the Supreme Court --- went to Miguel Estrada and John G Roberts Jr., who had played important behind-the scenes roles in the Florida litigation.


Posted by: MMGood | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:48 PM
horizontal rule
9

I meant what Labs says in 6. He doesn't excite Bush's base, I should have said.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:51 PM
horizontal rule
10

Yes, important to remember is that we're trying to read a lot about him from not much info. Roberts, however, worked for Bush's dad. Bush knows this guy well.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:51 PM
horizontal rule
11

They seem pretty excited on NPR. At least as much as I could stand to listen to. I haven't seen any non-happy reactions to the nomination.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:52 PM
horizontal rule
12

You didn't hear any excited people on NPR; don't lie.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:52 PM
horizontal rule
13

He's pretty clearly a vote to overrule Roe. This, from Slate, mentions that while working for the Solicitor General, he wrote at least one brief (and I believe from other reading that I can't find quickly, that he wrote many) unambiguously taking that position. Now, that's not necessarily his personal view, but it seems fairly likely that it is.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:53 PM
horizontal rule
14

Excited for them. Too much excitement is a sin.

(going to the just-opened Whole Foods! bbl.)


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:54 PM
horizontal rule
15

They have big black ladies at your Whole Foods? Yummy.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:55 PM
horizontal rule
16

"the core belief of the the Bush family is Business. They have to placate social conservatives and the rest of us, but what they're about is helping business. "

Uhh, well duh. It was obvious to anyone with eyes since before 2000 that the ONLY issue Bush cared about was routing money to the rich. Everything he does that's not directly related to that is basically designed to fool the rubes into supporting him so that he can do that. I mean it's not like he takes terrorism or medicaid or social security seriously; but damn, those tax cuts go through year after year; and while Iraq does nothing but help terrorism, it buys support of the red states while also allowing levels of corruption not seen since the Civil War if then.


Posted by: Maynard Handley | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:57 PM
horizontal rule
17

LB, Ann Coulter says he said,

"In the interest of full disclosure, the author would like to point out that as Deputy Solicitor General for a portion of the 1992-93 Term, he was involved in many of the cases discussed below. In the interest of even fuller disclosure, he would also like to point out that his views as a commentator on those cases do not necessarily reflect his views as an advocate for his former client, the United States."

For what it's worth.

Again, I'm sure he's quite conservative.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 2:57 PM
horizontal rule
18

There are statements by wingnuts saying how happy they are about the choice. I think you can safely conclude he's good for the base. If they aren't overly excited, it's because they want all the seats that come up; you don't start celebrating at halftime. (Or, if Stevens goes, after the first quarter.)

I mean if you've seen him ATM...a wink's as good as a nudge, ya know what I mean.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
19

Yeah, the more I read, the more they seem cool with the pick, but I still expected someone more firebreathing.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
20

Oh, it's possible he thinks Roe is good law, you don't necessarily hold every position you adopt in a brief, but on a matter that ideological it would be normal to have the brief written by someone who agreed with it. I'd be surprised if he isn't an anti-Roe vote.

(And re your Whole Foods comment: what is wrong with you? Geez.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:03 PM
horizontal rule
21

Wait till they get Stevens' seat. Many fireworks will you see on the way to the internment camp.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:04 PM
horizontal rule
22

I think fair-skinned ladies are yummy too, LB, no need to get tetchy.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:07 PM
horizontal rule
23

You know it's no fun making racially insensitive comments unless someone is humorlessly PC about it, right? Just making sure you get that little transgressive thrill.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:09 PM
horizontal rule
24

I think he wanted to put someone through who'd be bulletproof, and it will probably work. It doesn't seem that complicated to me, strategically. He wanted to flummox the Dems, while nominating someone that his base would be satisfied with. This guy fits remarkably well.

I think someone in the Senate should ask about his views on corporate personhood. Though everyone will know the answer already.

I wonder when corporations are going to be granted the legal right to vote.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
25

Was it racially insensitive? I'm not sure I see that. I was going for the deliberate misunderstanding thrill.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
26

I thought it was meant to be a weight-insensitive comment.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
27

Wow, it's like the Rorschach of insensitive comments.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:13 PM
horizontal rule
28

It's actually about the Jews!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:13 PM
horizontal rule
29

I'm not sure I see that.

Basically, I'm just giving you shit here, but making a joke about big black women being on sale, whether at Whole Foods or anyplace else? Racially insensitive.

Look, someone has to be humorlessly PC.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
30

Oh, I didn't think that they might be on sale (where's your mind, LB?); just that they'd be there--just like I go to Whole Foods hoping to find earthy women who like to eat well.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:16 PM
horizontal rule
31

I am humbled: your superior PCdom has exposed the latent racial insensitivity concealed beneath my objection to your comment.

Quick, everyone look over there!


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
32

humorally-challenged, LB, humorally-challenged


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
33

That's not a nice thing to say to a woman with no arms.

("How do I type?" you ask? Badly.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:23 PM
horizontal rule
34

Silly LB, you're thinking of the humerus.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
35

Curses, oversensitive again. (And my nose is getting sore from all of this typing.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
36

Ok, maybe "differently-humored"? "Satirically-impaired"?

There's got to be a PC term for this.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
37

Nothing can be as good as the term for 'dead' I saw somewhere: Metaphysically challenged.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:27 PM
horizontal rule
38

LB, if you're typing with your nose, how do you manage capital letters?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:27 PM
horizontal rule
39

'Caps Lock', letter, 'Caps Lock' works. (Symbols, now -- those are trickier.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
40

is metaphysically challenged a douglas adams line?


Posted by: Ian D-B | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
41

No hyphens for differently humored, satirically impaired, humorally challenged.

. . . I tried to make a joke with Hume-morally challenged, and I'll do it if I keep seeing these hyphens.


Posted by: Kriston | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
42

what-ever


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:42 PM
horizontal rule
43

Roberts strikes me as a George H.W. Bush Republican, not a George W. Bush Republican. I.e., conservative like Pappy, not conservative like Judge Roy Moore of the 10 Commandments statue fame. I.e., a business-oriented conservative, not a religious-oriented conservative.

In short, Roberts strikes me as what a conservative was before the American Taliban took over the Republican Party. Which, I suspect, is as good as we'll get out of the Bush Administration. At least the old-line conservatives like Goldwater and Nixon were generally sane albeit often crooked, unlike the religious nutballs who have taken over the Party since the time of Goldwater and Nixon.

- Badux the Snarky Penguin


Posted by: BadTux | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 3:50 PM
horizontal rule
44

Hamdan is kind of scary--carte blanche to the executive on Gitmo tribunals even if they're contrary to international law.

Wacky environmental stuff too. Very willing to say that environmental groups lack standing to sue. Chris Clarke has more. I sort of think that I would have preferred Luttig.


Posted by: bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 4:01 PM
horizontal rule
45

They have big black ladies at your Whole Foods?

Our checkout lady. Her name was Queen.

And, I am OUTRAGED by LB's comment implying that people with no arms type with their noses! FOR SHAME! Some use their toes.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 5:30 PM
horizontal rule
46

One could hold a pen in one's teeth and use it to depress the keys.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 5:33 PM
horizontal rule
47

Or a pencil, Ben, or a pencil.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
48

Voice-to-text.

I'm sorry, are those hyphens incorrect?


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 5:36 PM
horizontal rule
49

Or men could use the Flynn method. Typing can't be that much more difficult than playing piano.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
50

Smaller keys make it more difficult for the fantastically endowed among us.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 6:00 PM
horizontal rule
51

Thanks, Ben. I was too modest to bring that up on my own behalf.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 6:04 PM
horizontal rule
52

You are, indeed, too modest to have a reason to bring that up, Michael.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 6:32 PM
horizontal rule
53

Your mom is lying and hurtful.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-20-05 6:58 PM
horizontal rule
54

Conservative judge, Roberts

Conservative judge, one of the nominees

As long as you don't eat sperm

I'm sure you're going to be confirmed


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-21-05 6:55 AM
horizontal rule