Re: Suck It Up! I Always Say.

1

I think this trait is more characteristic of rugby players than Austrians.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
2

Closed tag did not.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
3

Clicking the pic link, maybe we can hypothesize that the people who love Australians love australians because they can play rugby and look like hearthrobs from teen movies instead of monsters like the English rugby players.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
4

Hey, American Footballers have been doing this for years.


Posted by: ChrisC | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 2:39 PM
horizontal rule
5

Lott just did the tip.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 2:42 PM
horizontal rule
6

Ronnie Lott does the aftergame broadcasts in San Francisco. He gets so happy when the 49ers win that it is fun to watch.


Posted by: Joe O | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 2:50 PM
horizontal rule
7

But he's not a rugby player. He's a football player (Aussie rules, that is) and they trend away from the squat, scarred, toothless rugby phenotype.


Posted by: Hank | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 4:25 PM
horizontal rule
8

Right. It's much more of a soccer look, and no one's prettier than soccer players.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 4:34 PM
horizontal rule
9

When he says "I love my footy" he means "I love to play football", not "I love my foot." Australians talk like that all the time.


Posted by: Kieran | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 5:37 PM
horizontal rule
10

I suppose next you'll tell me that when I say, "I love hoops," I'm saying that I love basketball, and not these big hoop earrings I just bought.

(Actually, I did realize that about "footy," but you're not the first person today to assume that I'm an idiot, and you probably won't be the last.)


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 5:41 PM
horizontal rule
11

I didn't think it was unreasonable to think a sentence like this

Is the fact that they can use words like "footy" when talking about elective amputation ...

might be misunderstanding the word "footy." So, sorry about that.

but you're not the first person today to assume that I'm an idiot, and you probably won't be the last

Whatever.


Posted by: Kieran | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 8:35 PM
horizontal rule
12

Someone tell me how the kids are using "whatever" nowadays, so I can know whether I've been dissed.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 8:40 PM
horizontal rule
13

no one's prettier than soccer players

And this is of course Ogged's true objection to the game.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 8:59 PM
horizontal rule
14

I wish I could jump in and tease Our Favorite Soccer Mocker, but I wouldn't want to sully our recent tennis consensus.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 9:16 PM
horizontal rule
15

The tennis consensus being that the Agassi game was great?

SB, I meant to ask you--what was the Oompa Loompa reference? And did it have anything to do with my friend Sheila?


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 9:38 PM
horizontal rule
16

This is like being trapped inside Pierre Bourdieu's nightmares. Every comment ruthlessly mined for maximum one-upmanship to increase the accumulation of one's blogospheric capital.


Posted by: Kieran | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 10:03 PM
horizontal rule
17

Healy concedes! Ten points from Slytherin!

No, seriously, Kieran, while I'm the world's expert on "footy," I've never quite understood how "whatever" is used, so I couldn't tell if you were saying "Brother ogged, surely you're being too sensitive, join me for a virtual beer," or "I'm not going to dignify that idiocy with a response."


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 10:11 PM
horizontal rule
18

Also, despite appearances, we are a friendly, collaborative lot, and what seems like oneupsmanship is usually just faith that our attempted cleverness will be improved upon by the next comment.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 10:24 PM
horizontal rule
19

Accusations of Slytherin membership? Is there no depth to which us dastardly liberals won't stoop? Also, isn't the obvious analogy for Timberites Ravenclaw?

Also, you're lucky this hasn't degenerated into a thread where typos are noted.

I also wasn't sure if Kieran's "whatever" was actually expressing irritation or just good humor.

And no one here has ever tried to one-up anyone else.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 10:42 PM
horizontal rule
20

Re 16: Isn't Kieran just playing part of the game himself even as he takes a shot at it? I didn't have any idea who Bourdieu was, and had to look it up.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 11:14 PM
horizontal rule
21

Well, that's just the kind of paralyzing self-analysis that I wish people could avoid. If it seems like a Bourdieu nightmare to you, you should feel free to say so, and people will either know what you mean, or ask, or look it up. (Which isn't to say that Kieran isn't a bad person. He is.)

More specifically, I didn't think Kieran was complaining about the type of oneupsmanship that has to do with erudition. (What exactly he did mean by that stuff about "mining" and "blogospheric capital," god only knows.)


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 11:23 PM
horizontal rule
22

You know what he means. Give Kieran back his blogospheric capital. Don't act all innocent.


Posted by: Joe O | Link to this comment | 09-13-05 11:46 PM
horizontal rule
23

The tennis consensus being that the Agassi game was great?

That, and more generally, that tennis is a sport.

The Oompa Loompa remark was just to let us imagine that ogged's porn preference runs to all-singing, all-dancing magical midgets. It didn't involve Sheila, as far as I know.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 5:03 AM
horizontal rule
24

Onballer is not so much a position as a generic term for a set of positions - the 'rover' and 'ruck rover' positions, both of which tend to follow the play up and down the field more closely than the other positions (Aussie Rules being primarily a man-on-man positional game). The 'ruck' position could also be included, but is usually distinguished, because of its special role when play is restarted after a score (from a bounce or ball-up) or from the ball going out of bounds (from a throw-in).


Posted by: Slakko | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 6:42 AM
horizontal rule
25

Isn't Kieran just playing part of the game himself even as he takes a shot at it?

Well as Bourdieu well knew, the best way to win this sort of game is to pretend you are not playing, while insinuating that were there a game (which of course there isn't) you would be winning handily.

Footy is more entertaining to watch, though.


Posted by: Kieran | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 7:16 AM
horizontal rule
26

Amputate a finger with anaesthesia? Big deal. This guy is much, much tougher.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 8:54 AM
horizontal rule
27

25: I was going to agree sarcastically, along the lines of "No, I'd rather watch a bunch of pasty people at computers one-upping each other at the injoke derby than watch soccer," but in fact it's true.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
28

Also, you're lucky this hasn't degenerated into a thread where typos are noted.

And it's not like we don't have the opportunity.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 12:13 PM
horizontal rule
29

I think Kieran has gone slightly mad. He's now taking shots at his wife on the front page of CT. My limited exposure to philo-types has convinced me that they are generally the smartest people in the room (mathematicians excluded), and certainly smarter than even very smart sociologists. I'm pretty sure she can figure out a way to dispose of his body without implicating herself.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 12:40 PM
horizontal rule
30

Laurie Paul asserts of her cat that she could not have been a banana. But what if it had been zapped with a wand of polymorph?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
31

Actually then it would just have turned into another kind of animal, and not a comestible—never mind.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
32

Is the implication of 28 that there's a typo (or other grammatical error) in the quoted line? If you say there is, I believe you, but I can't find it. I know there are errors that have gone unremarked on in the thread in general.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 1:11 PM
horizontal rule
33

pasty

Speak for yourself, white (insofar as a Jew can be white) man.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 1:56 PM
horizontal rule
34

another kind of animal, and not a comestible

Those are hardly mutually exclusive categories, my good Ben.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
35

fucking Australians, anything to change the subject from that of *cricket*, working class sport of the world in which we beat them this week. "Footy" is a sport so utterly pointless that nobody, not even the Irish, will play against them.

Ahem

In the town, where I was born

Lived a man, who was a thief

And he told us of his life

Stealing bread and shagging sheep

So he went into the nick

The magistrate, he had to see

And they put him on a ship

To a convict colony.

You all live in a convict colony, a convict colony,a convict colony

You all live in a convict colony, a convict colony,a convict colony

to the tune of "Yellow Submarine"


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 2:49 PM
horizontal rule
36

Laurie Paul asserts of her cat that she could not have been a banana. But what if it had been zapped with a wand of polymorph?

Interesting choice of objects. What if her cat had been zapped with a "wand of polymorph" (**inner dialogue: wand of polymorph??...oh, just let it go.**) indeed.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 2:56 PM
horizontal rule
37

28: One typo in each of the updates. The point being, I was sweet and restrained in not pointing it out, until your comment made it necessary to do so. (Actually, it wasn't necessary at all, but I hate exercising restraint because it's so hard to ensure you get proper credit for it.)


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 3:00 PM
horizontal rule
38

I hate exercising restraint because it's so hard to ensure you get proper credit for it.

Yes, exactly.

Apostropher: in nethack, comestibles (which includes corpses of just about anything) are a different class from living animals.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
39

re 15/23 - I was wondering, because Ogged is not alone in his Oompa Loompa fetish.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 09-14-05 8:38 PM
horizontal rule
40

That photo/caption is deliciously wrong—out of the ashes of Sheila's dignity, a naughty phoenix.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-15-05 5:10 AM
horizontal rule
41

Footy has a point. It's all about hitting people and kicking goals. What else is there in life?


Posted by: Bo | Link to this comment | 09-15-05 10:48 PM
horizontal rule
42

I'm way late to this thread, but I'm amazed that no-one, particularly no-one Australlian, commented on the irony of a Welshman accusing anyone of being a sheepshagger.

On second reading, though ("In the town, where I was born . . ."), I suppose dsquared was just asserting that Wales dealt with its sheepshagging problem by just exporting it to Australlia. Those crafty Welsh . . .


Posted by: Mitch Mills | Link to this comment | 10-14-05 8:02 AM
horizontal rule