Re: Concluding Unscientific Postscript

1

I'm younger than you are, but I agree with the sentiment.


Posted by: bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
2

Some of them are just trying to ward off mack dads like yourself.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
3

That's not true, ogged.

Even some of the grossly disfigured people are married.


Posted by: Sam K | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
4

I'm your age or close to it, and everyone I know is already divorced.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
5

Except for your cobloggers.

Also, Sam, if what you say is true, Ogged may have violated a relevance implicature but he didn't speak the false.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:49 AM
horizontal rule
6

Oh, you meant gross disfigurement of the mind.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:49 AM
horizontal rule
7

FL, I know.


Posted by: Sam K | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
8

I was speaking for you, not about you, Labs.

ac, tell them to take their rings off, then.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
9

I started to make the same point as 5, couldn't remember the term "relevance implicature," and then saw on preview that labs had made it.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
10

I'm close to your age and married, but don't wear a wedding ring. And ac is right - nearly everybody I know is divorced.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 8:56 AM
horizontal rule
11

It was actually a joke. I pretended to console ogged by implying that his situation couldn't be as bad as he says it is. And then, BAM!, even grossly misfigured people are better off than you, ogged!

See what I did there?


Posted by: Sam K | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:00 AM
horizontal rule
12

I just met a decidedly undisfigured (figured?) 28 year old divorced woman this weekend--she looked a bit like Amelia Warner--who told me she'd moved out of her artist husband's house to go live with her grandmother who has dementia, and said that she would prefer a year of the nonsensical and heartbreaking ravings of her old nana to even one more day with her husband. So there may be some consolation in that.


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:09 AM
horizontal rule
13

No rings whatsoever... and I am just a smidge older than you, as I recall.

It's my pinky toes, isn't it. I'd give up the body, grace and rhythm that 14 years of ballet gave me, if I could just get rid of these wonky toes. They are keeping me from true happiness. I know it.

ps stone all the smug marrieds.


Posted by: girl27 | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:09 AM
horizontal rule
14

I can't now remember whether I've always thought of myself as, or have been told that I would be, great second husband material. Maybe there is some hope, after all. But my poor Iranian family; first I'm engaged to a Jew, now I'm vulturing divorcees.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
15

Some people wear both, and they should be beaten.

WTF? It's called a set. I think most married women wear them that way.

Also, have you considered that maybe all of the women you meet are wearing fake rings simply to keep you from making advances?


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
16

I think most married women wear them that way.

I think you think this implies more than it does.

If you and SB are right that the rings are apotropaic, then I guess I should start ignoring them, and take my chances.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:15 AM
horizontal rule
17

I think you think this implies more than it does.

That their husbands spent thousands of dollars to buy them a shiny rock and would be pissed if it was only worn during the months of the engagement?


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:17 AM
horizontal rule
18

As I looked up apotropaic I was set on it meaning "frequently used as a false signal," but no such luck.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
19

Sometimes these women will even walk around with male acquaintances who will pose as their husbands. Remain undeterred.


Posted by: Tarrou | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
20

I did once get friend and sometime commenter Kitty Darfour to approach a woman and give her his number while her boyfriend watched. They almost came to blows.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
21

They almost came to blows.

But then they zipped up and walked away.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
22

the body, grace and rhythm that 14 years of ballet gave me


Are you coming on to me (or anyone else), 27?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
23

Are you coming on to me (or anyone else), 27?

w-lfs-n, I'd imagine.


Posted by: Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
24

And, IIRC, she's substantially younger than you, ogged. For some reason she confuses everyone else with w-lfs-n.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
25

Nope.


Posted by: girl27 | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
26

Who's younger than me? 27 is, as she says in her comment, a bit older than me.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
27

Does Ogged abide wonky toes?


Posted by: Tarrou | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
28

As a guy who has gone through several true loves, and a couple of "I'll love you when you're sixty-four" relationships, to reach his late forties, y'know, cry me a river.

I mean that only kindly and gently, of course. From one beaten person to another who might or might not be.

(Note: that's not "beaten" in a "I won't get up again tomorrow" way.)


Posted by: Gary Farber | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
29

"Than" is so obviously a preposition, the conjunction faction must be all of them trolls.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
30

Ogged, I know several single, attractive, intelligent, largely non-crazy women in the Twin Cities of about your age (30 or so). In addition to not being located in Oggedville, however, I'm sure they wouldn't be up to your crazy standards. So, umm, sucks for you.


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
31

I think it's an illusion. You're just hanging out in the wrong bars or something. There are plenty of women who put their careers first and are having second thoughts. Swoop in!


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:55 AM
horizontal rule
32

My girlfriends are typically crazier than my standards.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
33

You might be right, Adam. I'm basing this on my time in the airport and on the planes this weekend. Every time I thought "She's kinda cute," there was a ring.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 9:57 AM
horizontal rule
34

Ogged, I know several single, attractive, intelligent, largely non-crazy women

"Largely non-crazy" seems dangeously similar to the medical euphemism mildly uncomfortable.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
35

Yeah, I balked at that too.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
36

I used the phrase "largely non-crazy" simply because I have never dated a woman who was not at least a little crazy. That's OK--a little crazy keeps things interesting--but, y'know, fair warning.


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
37

There are plenty of women who put their careers first and are having second thoughts.

I wonder about the wisdom of such advice. I'm sure that there are unmarried women who find that being paid to be fungible is less than fulfilling. But isn't their newfound desire for a husband simply an example of them chasing a new myth - happiness and meaning can be found entirely inside a marriage and family? That seems like a lot of burden for any relationship to bear, and I suspect such marriages are doomed to failure or (worse) enduring misery.

Really, the problem is the same that single women our age complain about - all the good ones are gay or married.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
38

all the good ones are gay or married

Well, I know this isn't true. Just among the commenters here there are cool women who I don't think are either. And I know several others in real life.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
39

Can we just settle on the Postulate of Universal Craziness and be done with this? I know I've been impatient with women's supposed "craziness," but then I realize -- oh wow! I'm actually intolerably weird as well! (Maybe this wouldn't hold in Ogged's case.)

At least you have the release valve of shipping someone over from Iran in case of emergency.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
40

There's weird, and then there's crazy. They sometimes come in the same package, but they are most definitely not the same thing.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
41

Well, I know this isn't true. Just among the commenters here there are cool women who I don't think are either. And I know several others in real life.

Yes, I realize that. I would note that you could probably say the same to women who complained about a dearth of decent men. I was just saying.

Anyway, I do worry that at our age, a lot of the women I meet want to get married to someone/anyone and get on with it. The man is really incidental to the baby. Maybe that's the way to go, but it creeps me out. I suppose as long as we keep no-fault divorces, it should work out fine.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
42

Since you brought up the topic, sort of, I just wanted to note that I'm getting married tomorrow. We haven't bought rings yet though, and may never get around to it. We're not opposed, just not bothered at the moment.

So hopefully that fact qualifies us for some happy vibes, or least the avoidance of any beatings?


Posted by: Mitch Mills | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:46 AM
horizontal rule
43

No beatings for Mitch! Yay!


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
44

Congratulations, Mitch and Mrs.!


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
45

5: You know, Sam only implicated that all of the non-disfigured are married....


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
46

Mitch gets the congratulatory beating! Hooray!

(Congratulations!)


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
47

I spoke too soon.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 10:52 AM
horizontal rule
48

Congrats, Mitch.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
49

Congratulations and best of luck, Mitch.

Just among the commenters here there are cool women who I don't think are either

You don't think they are either cool or women?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 11:20 AM
horizontal rule
50

Congratulations, Mitch!

May you bake good bread together!


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 11:21 AM
horizontal rule
51

No fewer, but possibly greater, than two people in my "cohort", as they call them, (22%) are married.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
52

Congratulations, Mitch!


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
53

Mitch,

Wow, congratulations to you and your bride!

And, ogged, have you seen the movie "Sideways" yet? Take the advice of the actor/friend. Why are you looking at rings? They don't prove anything!


Posted by: Tripp | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:00 PM
horizontal rule
54

Every alleged woman on the Internet is really a 47-year-old, balding, fat man. Discuss.

A good chunk of my friends are married, engaged, and/or pregnant and increasingly disdainful of anyone who hasn't done this yet, suspecting them of perpetuating a vast left-wing conspiracy to, well, I'm not sure, but I think it involves shoes and martinis and a luscious lifestyle.


Posted by: Sophia Incognita | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:17 PM
horizontal rule
55

And yay Mitch! Congrats!


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
56

"greater" should so be "more," Ben.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:22 PM
horizontal rule
57

To which I say, don't start none, won't be none.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:26 PM
horizontal rule
58

Congrats, Mitch!


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
59

Ahem!


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
60

Are you saying you wear both a wedding band and an engagement ring, PG?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
61

Or is it "second husband material"?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 1:00 PM
horizontal rule
62

I wear neither. I was just taking exception at ogged's initial post.

I missed the second husband material bit in the comments before. But hey -- what's wrong with divorced women? It isn't always our fault ...


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
63

There is absolutely nothing wrong with divorced women.

If ogged is getting accused of being "second husband" material he has got a bad case of the "good guy" syndrome, whcih has almost nothing to do with actually being a good guy.


Posted by: Tripp | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 1:39 PM
horizontal rule
64

Oh look, there's profgrrrrl. Funny that I've met you, PG, and didn't realize you were disfigured.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
65

I thought that was it, but frankly I've given up on Ogged ever picking up on the numerous lovely and talented women who make a play for him at the Mineshaft. I mean, if his account is correct he didn't even try to hug you on Teh Date. What is to be done?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 2:05 PM
horizontal rule
66

Oh, and there's nothing wrong with divorced women; they're just not traditional Iranian bride material (which, I hasten to add, does not rule them out for me).


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
67

Congrats, Mitch! Also, "than" is a conjunction!


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
68

That's fantastic, Mitch. I also just got some great news: I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
69

he didn't even try to hug you on Teh Date

Indeed, he did not. I would have been open to a hug, but I feared invading his personal space. I know ogged is fussy about this stuff.

And in fact I've since seen ogged one other time but not blogged it because I was undercover and not wanting to post that I had gone out of town and landed in oggedville ... and there was no hug then either.

Apparently I am disfigured in a way that is not noticeable? Hrm.


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
70

they're just not traditional Iranian bride material

Were the women on that Iranian hookup site (who I assume are traditional Iranian bride material?) disfigured?


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
71

You're going all literal on my ass here, PG. If you want a hug, all you have to do is jump me and not get all offended when I say "What in God's name are you doing, woman?"


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:44 PM
horizontal rule
72

You should probably make it easier on your prospective huggers.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:46 PM
horizontal rule
73

Why do you say that, Ben?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:49 PM
horizontal rule
74

A passing fancy.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:55 PM
horizontal rule
75

I find that addressing females as "woman" is the best of all possible strategies for endearing myself to them.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:55 PM
horizontal rule
76

Me too, Michael.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 3:57 PM
horizontal rule
77

69: !!! Maybe you don't need to work on your game, Ogged.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:23 PM
horizontal rule
78

I mean, it sounds like at this rate you may actually be able to get PG to jump you. As long as nobody reveals the game plan.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:23 PM
horizontal rule
79

Also, "than" is a conjunction!

See? Unsupportable bad-faith provocation.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:25 PM
horizontal rule
80

Good thing everyone here is so discreet.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:25 PM
horizontal rule
81

ogged, man, it might be a good idea to stop replacing the "kick me" sign taped to your ass every time it falls off. you're constantly reminding me of a guy from my high school who was forever approaching girls and saying, "you wouldn't want to go out with me, would you?"


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:34 PM
horizontal rule
82

Wait, snees—that's a bad strategy?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:35 PM
horizontal rule
83

Never tried it myself, but the guy in high school -- who was of Iranian extraction, come to think of it -- never seemed to get anywhere. Actually, that guy was quite into philosophy and using words that he knew no one else would understand. Hmmm.


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:43 PM
horizontal rule
84

You go to a Jesuit school?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:47 PM
horizontal rule
85

How could you have guessed? Agricola, agricolae... (priest pulling me by the hair out of my chair as i hesitate when trying to come up with the dative).


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:50 PM
horizontal rule
86

Oh come one. First conjugation is totally easy.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:54 PM
horizontal rule
87

So is first declension (ahem). And "oh come one"? Your pedantry fails you three times in one comment, w-lfs-n.

But I will admit to being a bit intimidated when, at 13, I had a Tony Soprano-looking Jesuit hovering over me as I tried to come to grips with cases, something I hadn't even heard of before the previous day.


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 4:58 PM
horizontal rule
88

Yes. Declension. On. (Isn't that two failures?)


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 5:06 PM
horizontal rule
89

Back when I was a single man, I employed what seems to be Ogged's strategy for getting girls: act like you're repulsed and terrified by all physical contact and hope that some woman finds that cute and challenging enough to attempt to vigorously overcome it. It didn't work very well back then. I can't imagine how badly it would come off at an age at which you're supposed to have acquired some degree of sophistication about such things.


Posted by: pjs | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 5:13 PM
horizontal rule
90

act like you're repulsed and terrified by all physical contact

I guess I can see how I come off this way. It's not the case, however.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 5:15 PM
horizontal rule
91

Sorry, w-lfs-n, i imagined the third. but if i were you, i would no doubt have pointed out that there should have been a comma after "oh".


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 5:35 PM
horizontal rule
92

I guess I can see how I come off this way. It's not the case, however.

Ok, then, everyone ... next time you see ogged run on up to him and give him a big wet sloppy kiss :)


Posted by: profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 09-20-05 6:52 PM
horizontal rule
93

Thanks everyone! I'm all shaved and cleaned up (which I do nicely, I'm told), and we're off to Athens City Hall in a coupla hours. Just gotta get this tie to look right.

But for having a blog, I'd totally liveblog it. I'm thinking that the simultaneous translation during the ceremony will be cause for some amusement.


Posted by: Mitch Mills | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 3:39 AM
horizontal rule
94

Hi! Nice day


Posted by: Emil | Link to this comment | 09-24-05 3:52 PM
horizontal rule