Wasn't it not approved because of the packaging or some such nonsense?
From the Healthy Policy link, Crawford excluded Janet "sex cults" Woodcock from testifying? Is this like Pensacola Christian complaining that Bob Jones is too liberal?
Also, Woodcock. Heh.
"testifying" s/b "participating in the approval process"
Was this the creepy anal sex enthusiast/rapist? Or am I thinking of another FDA appointee? Jesus. Can we go back to when it wasn't reasonable to think that everyone Bush has appointed is either insane, corrupt, or hiding some absolutely terrifying personal secret? Cause I'd like to have less of a crawly feeling whenever I read the news.
Man, if it is the same guy, the universe better fix it so he gets punched in the face by everyone he meets, forever.
amen. OTC should have been OTC so the fuck head pharmacists cant do shit.
Creepy anal sex wife-raping FDA guy was David Hager.
Can't keep your Bush appointees straight without a scorecard.
I'm almost (but only almost) sad to hear that his pleading the 5th might have to do with a separate criminal investigation. Left as merely a refusal to explain himself, it would leave me able to believe that someone in the Administration might actually have a sense of shame.
8 -- wouldn't he have to have threat of a criminal investigation, to take the 5th? I thought you couldn't do it in civil cases unless there was a risk of incriminating yourself in a criminal matter. But I ANAL and may be wrong.
But I ANAL and may be wrong.
If anal is wrong, I don't wanna be right.
neither does David Hager, from the sound of it...
neither does David Hager, from the sound of it...
sorry about that... the wierd part there is that i only clicked "post" once...
But we can't make it available over the counter! Because teenage girls might use it recreationally! It encourages promiscuity! Seeing their friends get knocked up and have babies and drop out of high school and live in poverty is important for the Moral Fiber of Our Children!
Making birth control difficult to acquire is all part of the conservative christian plot to encourage anal sex!
Because teenage girls might use it recreationally!
To be fair, it does pack a wicked awesome buzz.
wouldn't he have to have threat of a criminal investigation, to take the 5th? I thought you couldn't do it in civil cases unless there was a risk of incriminating yourself in a criminal matter.
Yes, he would have to be afraid that his anwers might incriminate himself. btw, refusing to attend a deposition altogether on Fifth Amendment grounds is improper. There have to be some questions that he can answer without risk of incriminating himself. One isn't permitted to refuse to answer any and all questions on Fifth Amendment grounds. Then again, maybe he's a fugitive from justice, wanted for heinous crimes under his true name, so he doesn't want to set foot in a deposition, where the first thing he would have to respond to is, "Please state your name for the record."