Re: Chris Muir's accelerating descent into madness

1

I wait for the inevitable random Chris Muir generator.


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
2

Awesome, awesome comment from Roy Edroso: "'The United Nations is a fag' has a mad genius "Andrew Sullivan's a fag" lacks."


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:25 AM
horizontal rule
3

I am 100% positive the "a posteriori" thing is a homo joke, just like "But[t]-it's the only thing he has." I'm really hoping he shows up in the comments; he's already made appearances at LG&M and Obsidian Wings.


Posted by: jw | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
4

clowna, right you are about the UN.

JW-- holy shit, I missed that butt joke. That would make sense of why the "but" is there, since she's not disagreeing with what he says in the last panel.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:38 AM
horizontal rule
5

Alleged Muir comments here.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
6

Oy vey. Men who are obsessed with other men's gayness. I can never figure that one out.


Posted by: NCProsecutor | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
7

I still want to know why that guy is masturbating so slowly.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:51 AM
horizontal rule
8

to draw out the pleasure of masturbatin' while discussing andrew sullivan and making gay anal sex references.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
9

He can't help himself, alameida. He's erotically charged merely by being exposed to such intellectual prowess.


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 12:02 PM
horizontal rule
10

Duh. Only a Peter puffer would waste time drawing men.


Posted by: Sven | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 12:09 PM
horizontal rule
11

Also, the guy is clearly to the right of the girl, but the shadows on the girl indicate the sun a bit to the right, but the shadows on the guy indicate the sun getting low on the left. Geez.


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 12:16 PM
horizontal rule
12

From Roy's place:

Muir hires out the graphics. The characters are a palette of computer-drawn pieces that he can assemble into a strip and print, and he contracts out for more characters or more poses of existing characters as required. He only originates the dialogue. Such as it is.

And I was giving him credit for at least being a barely competent, obsessive letch. Sheesh.


Posted by: Sven | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
13

That makes so much more sense.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:17 PM
horizontal rule
14

Well, the dinosaur comic uses exactly the same drawings every single time, and that's cool.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:18 PM
horizontal rule
15

Right but it's funny.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:23 PM
horizontal rule
16

Also, the using of the same clip art is, like, part of the joke.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:33 PM
horizontal rule
17

I have issues with clip art comics. I figure if you're not putting any effort into the art, the text better be really fucking hilarious.


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
18

Yeah, David Rees uses clip art to humorous effect.

But here's what gets me: it's one thing to express what's on one's own diseased mind. It's quite another to outsource it. "Ah, yes, could you draw me some cartoons of women as they might appear to an oversexed 14 year old?"


Posted by: Sven | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:38 PM
horizontal rule
19

Trudeau also doesn't do his own drawings. He took a break in the eighties and when he came back Doonesberry looked a lot different.


Posted by: joe o | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
20

I thought he still drew them, he just had someone to ink the pencil drawings.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
21

maybe:

They both work hard. Carlton draws one week of strips at a time, each three times larger than they appear in the paper. He spends about two hours per daily strip, or 12 hours a week, actually drawing. The Sunday strip takes four to five hours to render and color. In addition, the two men are in touch by phone several times a week to talk over concepts and each pencil sketch that Trudeau has mailed to Kansas City.


Posted by: joe o | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
22

Huh. You notice that story's from 1982? So it can't be about something that happened after Trudeau's hiatus.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
23

I always dress in lime green bikinii when discussing Kant.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
24

Show us your noumena!


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 2:51 PM
horizontal rule
25

Judging by panel 3, the red-haired-winger-vixen appears to be talking out of her spine. Unless a talking horsefly has landed on her back. That seems more probable. Bite her! bite her!

Also, what the fuck is a unique cant? Cant is shared by definition.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 3:23 PM
horizontal rule
26

I was wrong about when Carlton started inking Doonesberry. It apparently started a few years after trudeau started with a sydicated strip.

This article says the practice of uncredited art help is pretty common for cartoonists.


Posted by: joe o | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 3:58 PM
horizontal rule
27

I am disturbed by the guy touching himself and the woman talking into her towel as if it's a cellphone.


Posted by: Doodle Bean | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 7:35 PM
horizontal rule
28

she's trying to feed the towel into her ear. also, the "unique cant" thing is probably just setting us up for some late Wittgenstein private language jokes from a semi-nude co-ed.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:03 PM
horizontal rule
29

It's funny that Sullivan's "cant" is unique, since Sullivan is just linking to one of the other blogs that discusses the idiocy of "Kantian nihilism" and Muir knows this, having commented both there and at ObWi.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:07 PM
horizontal rule
30

I just don't understand how philosophy and language have become appropriate substrata for whatever stupid corrosively reductive method these fuckwads want to employ. The rightwingers do better when they're appealing directly to the stupid, rather than appealing to the stupid who like to make sounds with their mouths related to the history of ideas.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:08 PM
horizontal rule
31

Idealist and baa, read that as "Chris Muir-type right wingers do better when..."


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:10 PM
horizontal rule
32

I guess I don't think of anyone here as a "right winger." I mean RW as those who care more about "winning" than about people, more about adherence to some prescribed set of ideas than about how politics actually affects human life. It's like a club who all laugh at each other's jokes no matter how sexist or racist they are because what's most important is their own triumphalism over hundreds of years of progressive thought.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:15 PM
horizontal rule
33

That is to say, I'd be mortified to discover I'd misdescribed a philosopher's ideas. I like being corrected. That's why I hang out here with the moderates who'd rather be correct than faithful to a party.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:22 PM
horizontal rule
34

No, baa and Ideal are crazy. But I think baa has spent most of his life in Boston, and that's excuse enough for more or less anything. And Ideal...having survived the near-breakup of the nation, the Depression, two World Wars, and now the complete refutation of conservative ideas, time has worn him away, until all that's left is what's hard.

(Are neither of you reading?)


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:30 PM
horizontal rule
35

I think they've stopped commenting on the political threads.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:32 PM
horizontal rule
36

The Civil War was traumatic for Idealist.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 9:46 PM
horizontal rule
37

H/ol/bo's got something nice up at CT. I think. I don't really understand it. But it sounds like he's peeing on Muir.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-21-06 11:23 PM
horizontal rule
38

We're googleproofing John Holbo's name now? Even when he's simply being referred to in his capacity as a CT blogger?


Posted by: str/sm/ngelo j/nes | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 6:03 AM
horizontal rule
39

I wasn't sure, and thought "better safe than sorry."


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 8:01 AM
horizontal rule
40

Over caution may be silly, but it's harmless. Extended discussion of the topic leads to undercaution. We're still very far from a discretion error, but probably best to drop the subject.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 8:05 AM
horizontal rule
41

Idealist and baa, read that as "Chris Muir-type right wingers do better when..."

Thanks, w/d. Of course, I know why w/d is being nice all of a sudden, but I won't tell.

all that's left is what's hard.

Sounds like an ad for a porn movie. Thanks, I guess.

The Civil War was traumatic for Idealist.

True, but being older than I am, JE, you would be in a position to know.

OK, all you Kantian nihlists get off my lawn, damn it. I have to get some work done.


Posted by: Idealist | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
42

For reason in revolt now thunders
And at last ends the age of Kant.

BTW, eb totally wins over at CT.


Posted by: OnFatEnglishman | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 8:31 AM
horizontal rule
43

True, but being older than I am, JE, you would be in a position to know.

I'm still kind of browned off at JE over the three-fifths compromise.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 9:07 AM
horizontal rule
44

Over caution may be silly, but it's harmless.

We stand at the top of a slippery slope, LB, and at the bottom is nothing but /// /////// //////.


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
45

It is just as well that Muir hasn't stopped off at Unfogged.
He's a flake but wouldn't have brought pastry.
FYC


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 9:41 AM
horizontal rule
46

Flaky pastry is the best.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
47

Isn't that comment missing a link?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 07-22-06 10:12 AM
horizontal rule