Re: I think I can use this thing to start a riot

1

She's right, we need to get back to the party of FRD.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:28 PM
horizontal rule
2

Only 34 Democrats in the House voted to bring these killers to justice in this fashion.

and by "killers" I mean people picked up at random who might have connections to killer like organizations

and by "this fashion" I mean lynch mobs.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:37 PM
horizontal rule
3

She inexplicably slighted JKF, though.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:38 PM
horizontal rule
4

I think we need to be in the same physical location to get a good riot going. It's hard to generate the roar of an angry crowd sitting alone in my office.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
5

It is Hugh Hewitt who favors FRD over JKF.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
6

I desperately want a "have you no sense of decency, sir?" moment for people who think like Hewitt does. The arc of the moral universe is long, and if it can't bend toward justice it might as well bend toward scorn and ridicule.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
7

I think I just swallowed my own spleen.


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
8

Does anyone still trust the vast breadth of our fellow citizens enough to oppose strong federalism?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
9

About the impact of this on the elections - are there any polls that asked Average Americans if they can define the term "habeas corpus"? And then asked whether Mr./Ms. AA whether the constitution protected one's right to go before a judge to see if they were being imprisoned unlawfully? The results of said poll would probably make me want to cry (my guesses on the percentage who get them right: 10% for question 1, 80% for question 2) but I think it could shed some light about the impact this may have on the election. Again, probably in a way that will make me want to cry.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
10

I don't know if it's effective or a good idea -- it's mostly anger -- but I just want to call them cowards. They're so afraid of their shadows that they're terrified by the possibility that some poor sap we've been slapping around, whether or not he's actually a terrorist or just someone we accidentally locked up, might get into a courtroom and ask the court to let him go. I really want to pop a paper bag behind Hewitt's head just so I can watch him piss himself.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:47 PM
horizontal rule
11

I think your number for 1 is way too high. I bet at most 5% of Americans could define habeas corpus.

I also bet the answer to 2 depends entirely on how slowly and carefully you explained the issue, and whether you mentioned the word "terrorism" earlier in the conversation.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
12

In the sixties, long after Welch's decency moment, I met a lot of adults who hadn't been chastised, for whom "McCarthyism" would have been meaningless or who would have taken it as a compliment. Just as the movement toward this day has been inexorable, with relatively little drama for most people, so that this doesn't look like a big day at all, so will the movement away from all this not be sudden, nor will a lot of minds actually change.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
13

8???? WTF does 'strong federalism' have to do with anything?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
14

13: Basically, I want my Blue state to start acting like a country, because I no longer trust my country to do so.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
15

LB, that's my thought as well. If we interpret him sincerely, he's cowardly; if not, he's a shameless opportunist.

When I think about this I'm amazed at how little faith people like this have in our principles.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
16

The language of HH's post is striking. "Collapse," "unmoored," "lost it collective mind." These are the same kind of apocolyptic words that the left uses to describe the right these days. There is a sense on both sides that things just can't continue.

OT: I always thought "The Paranoid Style of American Music" would be a good title for an album of protest songs.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
17

I called Clinton's office to ask her to support a filibuster. I called it the 'Military Commissions Bill'; the staffer called it the 'Torture Bill'. No commitment on the filibuster, but I know where her staff stands.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:57 PM
horizontal rule
18

Hugh Hewitt: fascist and liar.

Kidnapping people, locking them up forever, giving them no opportunity to demonstrate their innocence. That's not "bringing them to justice" -- it's bringing the US to injustice.

Of course, the spineless wimp Democrats who supported torture and kidnapping are being attacked just as much as the ones who stood up for the Constitution and human rights. So much for voting out of fear. Why don't they get it?


Posted by: Nathanael Nerode | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
19

16 -- wow that's an excellent idea. If I ever compile an album of protest songs I will seek your permission to use it.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
20

Tim, I knew what you meant in 8, but this kind of bill would still be a federal matter with any kind of federalism short of secession (which I don't favor and think is unconstitutional). Unless you in some way changed the jurisdiction of the FBI, ATF, Federal Marshalls, Secret Service, etc. so that they'd need a states permission to operate in that state. Which is pretty fucking strong federalism.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
21

I also just called the NY Senators again.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
22

Mmm. For 'strong federalism' to mean the capacity of your state to protect you from the Feds, we'd have to roll back the Civil War. That may be a good idea at some point, but I'm not seeing it yet.

(Although, if all 50 states went their separate ways? NY is a pretty damn viable country. I bet we're agriculturally self-supporting, even without mentioning NYC as an economic driver. If we kept Jersey, too? Even better.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:03 PM
horizontal rule
23

20: I know it's a loser, but what I really want is guarantees in state constitutions that provoke fights whenever what should be federal standards are violated. At the end of the day, the law says whatever the courts say the law says, court fights are part of the way what the law says gets negotiated, and a strong federalist architecture is a way of structuring the fights.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:04 PM
horizontal rule
24

LB -- We're with you, but I expect South Jersey to secede and join the slave states.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:04 PM
horizontal rule
25

The tomatoes come from North Jersey, right? Who needs Atlantic City.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:07 PM
horizontal rule
26

So, am I understanding correctly that the vote could take place at any moment now?


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:07 PM
horizontal rule
27

I dunno. If you have a TV, which I don't, check C-Span.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:09 PM
horizontal rule
28

Well, it's just that insofar as this is about foreign affairs and regulating the national military, it's not the sort of thing that states qua states can have different opinions on.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:10 PM
horizontal rule
29

Does anyone still trust the vast breadth of our fellow citizens enough to oppose strong federalism?

Because I trust my fellow citizens of Lubbock so much more.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:11 PM
horizontal rule
30

Well I went ahead and called Menendez and Lautenberg's office. Both are maintaining lists of people who called to support a filibuster so obviously I am not alone. I must say the intern who is answering Lautenberg's phone the last couple of times I have called there is extraordinarily inarticulate for someone in his line of work.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:16 PM
horizontal rule
31

Well, it's just that insofar as this is about foreign affairs and regulating the national military, it's not the sort of thing that states qua states can have different opinions on.

Of course they can. They can recharacterize actions, they can claim rights that must be balanced, they can claim rights of interpretation; they can say whatever they want. It might all be disingenous and in bad faith, it might be bad for the country if they won, but they can more or less claim whatever they want. And provoke a fight. Imagine if all of the Blue states--that is, almost all of the productive states-- were fighting explicitly with the federal government over issues on which all prior relevant history indicated that the states should clearly lose. I think people would worry about the possibility of disunion. And I think it would bring everyone to the the table.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:23 PM
horizontal rule
32

Today, I'm thinking I will not vote Democratic again in a national election. I want to vote for an opposition party, and there isn't one.

As the post vividly demonstrates, there was NO excuse not to filibuster. None.


Posted by: Anderson | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:30 PM
horizontal rule
33

Hate to bring you guys down from your cheery mood.....


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:31 PM
horizontal rule
34

Labs, what's the post title from? It sound familiar, but googling it in quotes didn't work.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:32 PM
horizontal rule
35

"The hills are aaaa-live with the paraaa-noid sound of music ...."

Speaking of Hewitt, Tokyo Rose died yesterday. Hewitt and K-Lo don't even have the excuse of a being captive behind enemy lines.

#29 gets it exactly right. Southerners get a little giddy when the Yankee yoke is removed.


Posted by: Paul | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
36

I suspect that Hugh Hewitt and Kathryn Jean Lopez are possible enemy combatants. Furthermore, I suspect that I can get them to confess to this in under seventy-two hours with techniques that will be perfectly legal in the bold new America ushered in by H.R. 6166.


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
37

Are 32 and 33 an oblique way of saying that the vote has been called? Or something else?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
38

The vote hasn't happened yet.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
39

Don't they have to vote down two or three more amendments first?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:49 PM
horizontal rule
40

32 disavows any obliqueness.


Posted by: Anderson | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:51 PM
horizontal rule
41

Thanks, -gg-d. 32 seems a bit premature -- every Demoncrat but 1 in the Senate voted in favor of the habeas amendment. If every Dimmocrat (but one, for the sake of argument) votes against the bill and it passes (as it would), does this cut strongly against the party?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
42

If they could have filibustered and didn't, yeah, it does. I'm still voting for them as better than the alternative, but if they don't filibuster they're a bunch of craven, useless, tools.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:56 PM
horizontal rule
43

And they didn't get out in front of the issue either. It would've been nice to build some momentum against this instead of hoping it would go away.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
44

Yeah, what happened on that? Yesterday or the day before Glenn Greenwald was saying that the bill wouldn't come to the floor of the Senate before the elections. I don't understand Congressional procedure at all.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 2:00 PM
horizontal rule
45

What seems to have happened is that Democrats didn't get out in front because they didn't know what was going to be in the final form of the bill, and then there was what, a day? between the final form and the vote. Which is fucking insane. I think harder than that about buying shampoo.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
46

I called Inouye and Akaka. Akaka's staffer was at least a little bit engaged with the issue. Inouye's mostly sounded bored.


Posted by: DaveL | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 2:05 PM
horizontal rule
47

44: Wasn't that the wiretap bill? I was confused by the same thing at TPMm. 45 is no excuse; they could've been kicking up a fuss instead of hoping for that evil ambitious shit McCain to save their asses.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
48

Ah. That'll teach me to skim.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
49

What seems to have happened is that Democrats didn't get out in front because they didn't know what was going to be in the final form of the bill

Pretty hard to guess, wasn't it? Ponies for everyone? Netflix bonus coupons for Gitmo inmates?

They knew ALL they needed to know.

And now we are told that 6 Dems kept a filibuster from happening. They should be run out of the party. And a party that won't run them out, isn't a party I care to support.

I can handle living in a country with literally no party that deserves my support. What I can't handle is getting repeatedly let down by the party I do support.

No more.


Posted by: Anderson | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 3:03 PM
horizontal rule
50

(Quoting you for facts at 49, LB, not trying to mix it up with you. I'm angry at the Dems, not at anyone on this thread, & afraid of confusing the two.)


Posted by: Anderson | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 3:04 PM
horizontal rule
51

No, fair enough, and I looked at your 49 and thought "Yeah, if it looked like I was defending them, I didn't mean to".

The 'we won't show you the bill until the day we vote on it' crap is powerful, though, and powerfully undemocratic. Public opposition looks (what's everyone's favorite word?) unhinged! when it's directed at what might be in a bill rather than what we know is. But that's no excuse for the way the Democrats lay down.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
52

My overwhelming emotion at all of this is not anger, sadness, or contempt. It is incredulity. How the hell did this happen?


Posted by: Glenn | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 3:20 PM
horizontal rule
53

Am I mistaken in 34 that the post title has a source?


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
54

The 'we won't show you the bill until the day we vote on it' crap is powerful, though, and powerfully undemocratic.

They should filibuster any such thing on general principle. Wait -- "general principle" -- they don't have any. Never mind.


Posted by: Anderson | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 3:39 PM
horizontal rule
55

More proof they just don't get it. On the same day Congress is set to pass a bill that desecrates our country's founding principles, Karen Hughes says that it may take years to fix the U.S. image abroad because of...the sex and violence in American movies.

"One of the things that I hear a lot, particularly in deeply conservative societies, is that parents feel kind of assaulted by American culture," Hughes said. "The sex and the violence that they see on television and movies ... some of the lyrics of our music."


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:04 PM
horizontal rule
56

I just registered on Hewitt's site to call him a cunt (I live in the UK, where that's an acceptable and everyday expletive, so you feminazis can fuck right off). Actually, I just asked whether he had any shame at all. I'm inclined to think not. That might have been the most craven thing I've ever read.


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:10 PM
horizontal rule
57

53: Best not to go digging for anonymous sources. Wouldn't want anything...unfortunate to happen.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
58

hooray for peter snees.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:20 PM
horizontal rule
59

Snees. Re feminazis, fuck you too. Otherwise, quite right.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:22 PM
horizontal rule
60

mcmc, i actually regret the feminazis remark, but i won't regret turning in my US passport for an Irish one. i will, however, grieve. what has happened to my country?


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:27 PM
horizontal rule
61

what has happened to my country?

Dude, we folded awful fast, didn't we?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:34 PM
horizontal rule
62

You're lucky you can do that. I'm so, so sick of the U.S. right now, of the cowardly unprincipled people who've just traded away their most basic rights for some dream of safety, or without even knowing or caring, of the corporate feudalists who are running the government as if they're the CEOs and the citizens are employees, of the bought and paid for press. I wish I could get the fuck out of here.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:36 PM
horizontal rule
63

All that's left is for Bush to declare himself a god. He's gotten about as close as he can, in a "Christian" country.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:38 PM
horizontal rule
64

The bill hasn't actually passed yet. I think we're right on the edge of folding, or doing something totally sweet and awesome.

I vote for the second option. So who's going to purchase the toilet paper?


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:38 PM
horizontal rule
65

mcmc, you're welcome to camp out in my backyard for a couple of weeks, if that's any consolation, but you'd probably get deported to darfur or the congo in the end.

the sick thing is that none of the people who have voted for the pro-torture bill actually believe it's needed. they're just trying to get re-elected. that includes sherrod brown, whom i've met and whom i consider a good guy. how long we'll stay in this muck is anyone's guess.


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:43 PM
horizontal rule
66

the sick thing is that none of the people who have voted for the pro-torture bill actually believe it's needed. they're just trying to get re-elected.

The meta-sick thing is, living in a country where voting for the pro-torture bill is seen as a good way to get re-elected. As opposed to a country where such a vote would be like drawing a swastika on one's forehead.


Posted by: Anderson | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:48 PM
horizontal rule
67

true. sad, but true.


Posted by: peter snees | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:51 PM
horizontal rule
68

Racketing up the ladder of meta-sickness, living in a country in which voting for the pro-torture bill is seen as a good way to get re-elected, not because the poopulation is pro-torture but because neither the media nor the opposition (nor even conscionable members of the ruling party for goodness sake) speak out to make publically known that this is, in fact, a lawless torture bill, so 95% of the population doesn't even realize what's going on.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 09-28-06 4:53 PM
horizontal rule