Aren't they vastly overrating smokiness and visual acuity?
I'm skeptical about their methodology.
Hey no peeking!
Hey, that was all on my own, I didn't even realize it was a link. I'm just a
math beer genius.
5: the answer was kind of obvious if you look at the explanation of the variables.
I think the post would have been more interesting if ogged had cropped out the explanation of the variables.
Shoddy work. There needs to be a variable in there for time elapsed since last sexual encounter.
Have a couple beers, teo. The post starts to look better and better!
7: I won't have my achievement marginalized.
12 -- Yeah w-lfs-n's just jealous because you beat him to the punch.
The research was commissioned by eyecare firm Bausch & Lomb PureVision.
14: I noticed that too. I wouldn't take this too seriously as scholarship.
"Wear our contacts, and you won't end up fucking ugly chicks."
I really think 10 has already won the thread.
Unfogged totally needs a "rate this comment" feature. Totally; if fuckin' -gg-d weren't spending all his time on worthless HTML buttons we might already have it.
Stop macking on B, Prosecutor. We don't do that kind of stuff here.
Emerson is influencing young Teo unfavorably.
A formula for the optimal conditions in which to measure your cock?
Maybe your cock, Michael.
Ben "Bad Science" Goldacre gets it exactly right with regard to this sort of crap.
25. a pack of American Spirit, a bottle of Patron, and it's HUUUUUUGE!
wheres the "will my bros find out" variabel/
16 s/b "Wear our contacts, and you won't end up fucking ugly chicks accidently."
Cause sometimes a man's just got needs. And no internet.
Wait, why are they assuming that space is one-dimensional?