Re: Roadmap

1

Ben w-lfs-n would just get you kicked off AdSense anyway.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:47 AM
horizontal rule
2

I am entitled to 3/8ths of everything.


Posted by: unf | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
3

Wait, didn't some of us already buy you some kind of nice dinner? Was there some post-dinner blogging of that blessed event that I missed? Quid pro quo, ogged.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
4

And a teddy bear.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:56 AM
horizontal rule
5

Yay! Free comment! It never tasted so good...


Posted by: neil | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:57 AM
horizontal rule
6

if I charge you all $5 for each comment you've left

Guess I'd better start buying lottery tickets.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:58 AM
horizontal rule
7

Oh yeah. Now that we're talking money, Unf shows up. Uh-huh.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:58 AM
horizontal rule
8

And finally! You blog about the "corporate finance" that you're both so excited about.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:02 AM
horizontal rule
9

The cross billing is going to get complicated, ogged.

You are essentially charging for consumeing content (comments). We, on the other hand, must bill for time spent on content creation. Clearly time spent plunging the depths of the hoo-hole is billable, while I suppose you could argue incessent refreshing is our own damn fault.

Last time I did contract work, I billed $100-250/hr. I'm sure the lawyers here have higher hourly rates, and assume some of the students, etc. are much less. Shall we settle on an average of $150/hr ?


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:02 AM
horizontal rule
10

All Wiener-pwned comments should be prorated. I'm not paying for a comment someone else already left.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:08 AM
horizontal rule
11

I'd like to discuss royalties for the in-jokes I've created.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
12

Ha ha! As a luker, I win!


Posted by: gea | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:10 AM
horizontal rule
13

lurker, that is.


Posted by: gea | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
14

Ogged, just subtract what I owe from the ad fees you're paying me for the naming rights to our party.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
15

Ogged, would it be okay if I paid you in unused condoms? I'm sure you have friends who could use them.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
16

I can give you two used condoms for every unused one sam k is offering.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
17

lurker, that is.

That'll be five bucks, sir.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
18

Lord, if I could only bill the time I spend on unfogged, my life would be complete. Can't you people work to develop some actual expertise in something? Then I will search out a rich client who needs to know more about that, whatever it is. And bill my time here as research forevermore!

Oh my would that be wonderful. I'd even start paying the $5 per comment fee. (Charging it back to the client, of course.)


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:18 AM
horizontal rule
19

Hey, we have actual expertise in lots of things. Ask me about RICO or fondant.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:22 AM
horizontal rule
20

I'm here if your client needs to know something about unused condoms.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:24 AM
horizontal rule
21

I'm reading up on terroristic interventions (that is, performance art). What can I do you for, Brock?


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:24 AM
horizontal rule
22

I'll just send you a bill for system administration in a bit, 'kay?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:24 AM
horizontal rule
23

Oh, and if anyone wants me to go into the DB and disguise who left it, I can do that: $1/comment if you just want it anonymized, $3/comment to have it attributed to someone else.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:25 AM
horizontal rule
24

Anybody got a recipe for RICO au fondant?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:27 AM
horizontal rule
25

I have an acuity for tax law and I do a decent impression of Ella Fitzgerald. How can I be of service?


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:27 AM
horizontal rule
26

If your clients needs some advice in narrative semiotics, I'm all yours for a low low price.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:27 AM
horizontal rule
27

[redacted]


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:27 AM
horizontal rule
28

w-lfs-n -- an awesome way of celebrating the New Year would be to reattribute all the comments in the database at random (Maybe preserving frequencies).


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:29 AM
horizontal rule
29

$3/comment to have it attributed to someone else.

That's right, folks! You could be Standpipe Bridgeplate for the low, low price of $39,990.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:29 AM
horizontal rule
30

Don't be tempted by Ben's offer in 23: I have a copy of the site on CD.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
31

ERROR: Your account has insufficient funds to post this comment. Please add funds to your account, and try again. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
32

19, 25, 26: I can make a bong out of almost anything and can tell you what household products will give you a buzz. Also, parenting advice.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
33

Is this a roadmap....to freedom?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
34

JM -- it's at the very least a roadmap to o-freedom.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
35

You may take away oor comments, but ye'll never take awa' oor freedom ...


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:37 AM
horizontal rule
36

Okay, 35 is awesome.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
37

CongressOgged shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemblecomment, and to petition the government for a redress of grievancesbetter cock jokes.


Posted by: OneFatEnglishman | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
38

Okay, 35 is awesome.

...Damn! I was only off by one post!


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
39

Well, so was I.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
40

Ogged, you'd be a fool to try to monetize this community. Everyone knows the only way to make money on the internet is to have Google buy you.


Posted by: tom | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
41

I think we should charge by the letter, not by the hour. And then commence to explicate our idiosyncratic representations in polysyllabic terminology in order to render them more comprehensible to the attending audience.


Posted by: Charles Dickens | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
42

Actually, Ogged, if you put ads up and we all religiously clicked on them, it would be possible to fund an international Unfogged Lollapalooza Tour and hold meet-ups in random bars every damned weekend until we all dropped from liver disease.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:06 PM
horizontal rule
43

Yeah, but who wants to click on ads?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
44

I believe that is a species of click fraud.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
45

19/20/21/22/25/32: it sounds like ogged should turn this place into a general purpose consultancy, like google answers, only with cock jokes.

Related -- here's your first billable question: am i the only one who thinks sentence really needs to be broken into two words, one spelled "sentence" that refers to jail term and the like, and one spelled "sentance" that refers to the grammatical groupings of subjects and verbs into which we organize our speech and writing? Having both these meanings carried by the single spelling sentence is pure madness.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:09 PM
horizontal rule
46

Yes.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
47

am i the only one who thinks sentence really needs to be broken into two words

Yes. That will be $5, please.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
48

That'll be ten dollars.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
49

Apo, you're undercutting my market here.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
50

It's the invisible hand, baby. Sink or swim.

(I charge by the metaphor.)


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:16 PM
horizontal rule
51

JM, Apo beat your price, so I'll go with his answer, even though you're both horribly wrong.

Though, now that I think about it, I've tried to get money to Apo before, and he dodges and evades and generally makes it very difficult, and ends up just inviting you to parties instead. So for lack of a better option I may have to just consider that one a freebie.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
52

Hmmph.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:26 PM
horizontal rule
53

The answer in 46 was more sententious, though.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:26 PM
horizontal rule
54

Yeah you did, didn't you? As with my sexual favors, though, I'm not allowed to accept money for my wit and wisdom.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:29 PM
horizontal rule
55

How does one monetize backhanded compliments from Ben w-lfs-n?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
56

That was neither backhanded nor a compliment, you shameless wench.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:32 PM
horizontal rule
57

I am right now commenting from a machine on which I installed Linux. For fun! Have I mentioned my excessive geekitude?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:32 PM
horizontal rule
58

Insults should be counted as gratuities, I'm sure.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:34 PM
horizontal rule
59

Go slol! What distro?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:36 PM
horizontal rule
60

My high school is in wikipedia.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:38 PM
horizontal rule
61

Ubuntu. So far, the great triumph was getting the wireless card working.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:38 PM
horizontal rule
62

Now Firefox is telling me I need a shockwave plugin to view the main Unfogged page. Surely not.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
63

And on the list of AP books on the HS webbage itself, it gives as an optional book for US history Zinn's People's History. I'm pretty sure no one ever mentioned that to us when I was there.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
64

Slol: if there's a youtube-embedding post on the front page, surely so.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
65

And, in fact, there is.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
66

Oh ah.

Okay, B-wo, what TeX editor do I want?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
67

Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
68

63: During my brief stay at the NC School of Science and Math, that was the main text we used for my history class.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:45 PM
horizontal rule
69

Really? That seems, I dunno, quaint. I've been using TeXShop.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:47 PM
horizontal rule
70

That is, you want Emacs, and you also want to use AUCTeX, which you may have to install, and reftex, which comes with, and probably also ebib (though right now it appears not to reliably sort cross-referenced entries after those that cross-reference them, since I think it just goes by a lexicographical sort on entry key---still, it's nice).

Learning to use emacs can be, uh, fun. You don't actually need to know that much to get some use out of it, though.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:47 PM
horizontal rule
71

No, I actually have learned to use Emacs. One of the reasons I mentioned it was quaint, though.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
72

60: Huh, mine too. Just a stub, though.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
73

Does TeXShop come with a web browser?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
74

No. I take it this is meant as a point in favor of emacs?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
75

I'm just saying, emacs is pretty awesome.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
76

pretty


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:57 PM
horizontal rule
77

Emacs subscribes to the UNIX design philosophy of "do one thing, and do it well". That one thing is kicking ass.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
78

Emacs + auctex + reftex is the best latex environment I know of. It's a little bit fiddly to get it working best on OS X these days, since there isn't an official release that supports it natively.

I've tried things like TexShop, but for any serious amount of editing, emacs just can't be beat.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
79

Shorter 66-77.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
80

I'm pleased that my addition of Ezra Klein as a notable alumnus has survived: "# Ezra Klein - Post-gay political blogger"


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
81

77: Is exactly wrong.

Emacs is essentially burying a little lisp machine inside whatever it is running as. So in other words, instead of doing on thing and doing it well, it does everything, and does it well (for the most part). This is why you have so many addons (including, for example, a computer algebra system).

ed/ex is the prototypical UNIX philosophy editor. Editors aren't a particularly good application of the philosophy.

Oh, I take it back a bit though, only the first part of 77 is wrong. Emacs does kick all kinds of ass.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:05 PM
horizontal rule
82

81 me


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
83

Yeah, soubz, it's b/c I normally use OS X that I gave up on emacs. But, you know, there's always something new to learn. Or in this case, something old to re-learn; I haven't used emacs since 1993 or so.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
84

Soubz: I actually do know how emacs works.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:08 PM
horizontal rule
85

See, it's a joke, because part of the stereotypical vi/emacs holy war is vi users saying that emacs doesn't conform to the unix design philosophy…

AMTF.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:09 PM
horizontal rule
86

emacs works very well in OSX, slolr; I use it there pretty much daily. You do have to build from source, but that is easy. You'll have to install auctex and reftex too, unlike a lot o linux distribs that include all that these days. The other thing to do is us `customize' to run pdflatex instead of latex, then OSX preview can view the output.

If you have a slower machine, you might opt for running it all under X and using xdvi to view, like any other *nix. For some reason pdflatex generation is notably slower (I did this on a G4 ibook, on my intel dual-core, it isn't noticeable)


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:09 PM
horizontal rule
87

84: yeah, i was being slow.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:09 PM
horizontal rule
88

63: We used it as a supplemental text in AP U.S. History. It was a nice change of pace.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:11 PM
horizontal rule
89

You don't have to build from source on OSX -- I downloaded a binary that is working very nicely, thank you.

The only thing I don't have working is gnuclient, but it's only a matter of time.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:13 PM
horizontal rule
90

89: ah, I should say, it works better if you build it. Unless the binaries are more up to date than they were when last I checked. For example, font rendering was much improved....


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
91

I use MikTeX on my windows machine, and have been too lazy to try to find an equivalent on a laptop running Ubuntu. The thing is, MikTeX just makes package management so very easy. As for Emacs, the problem is that you have to learn how to use it.

This thread has been officially ruined by geeks.


Posted by: Chris | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:28 PM
horizontal rule
92

Can we get a vi-style comment entry box? It would keep out the riff-raff.


Posted by: neil | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:28 PM
horizontal rule
93

Where would we be without riff-raff?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:32 PM
horizontal rule
94

We wouldn't have any fucking cake, that's for sure.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:32 PM
horizontal rule
95

Wow, I thought this thread would be funny. It was, for a brief moment, and then it went to Nerdtown.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:35 PM
horizontal rule
96

So, what is TeX used for?


Posted by: Charlie Whitaker | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
97

Oh, wait:

... In comparison, the total-fit line breaking algorithm used by TeX and developed by Donald Knuth and Michael Plass considers all the possible breakpoints in a paragraph, and finds the combination of line breaks that will produce the most globally pleasing arrangement.

Global pleasure, then.


Posted by: Charlie Whitaker | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:40 PM
horizontal rule
98

Donald Knuth! That guy was awesome.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
99

92: I can't help but think that, intentionally or no, this comment is directed at me and my kind.


Posted by: NCProsecutor | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
100

If this blog doesn't get exciting soon, I may have to actually do some studying. I prefer not to.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
101

95, meet 79.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
102

It's $10 for geeky comments. Carry on.

Also, 79=awesome.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
103

96: Many things that people otherwise mistakenly use a word processor for.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:44 PM
horizontal rule
104

The geeks also ruined the "how many 60 year olds could Yglesias beat up" thread. Yet they never seem to derail discussions of Latin American dictators or Iraq policy.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
105

79 was awesome. I thought the theme needed some amplification.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
106

You know what I like? Microsoft Word, bitches.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
107

106: yeah, but you would.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
108

106: Yeah!


Posted by: NCProsecutor | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:49 PM
horizontal rule
109

Browsing apo's image directory shows one a very odd mix of disturbing, hilarious, and inscrutable, peppered with cute pictures of Noah.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:50 PM
horizontal rule
110

ogged, you really are unAmerican.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
111

The other thing to do is us `customize' to run pdflatex instead of latex, then OSX preview can view the output.

(add-hook 'TeX-mode-hook 'tex-pdf-mode)

And Leblanc, what do you mean "was"? Knuth is still alive.

As for 79, I'm just glad that, contrary to my filename-based expectations, the pic was unrelated to lemonparty.jpg.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
112

I'm really starting to like the name Noah. It's pretty and fun to say.

Surely, like Emma, it will now be ruined before I ever get around to having kids.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
113

Personally, for baby names, I prefer Jason, Caleb or Tab.


Posted by: NCProsecutor | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:54 PM
horizontal rule
114

103: Does this mean there's some sort of arts and crafts ethic going on in the comp sci / mathematics community?


Posted by: Charlie Whitaker | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:54 PM
horizontal rule
115

This was almost a good thread.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
116

109: Casket_security? That was weird, huh?


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 1:58 PM
horizontal rule
117

Adorable!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:00 PM
horizontal rule
118

116: Yeah, that and "omgwtf.jpg".


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:01 PM
horizontal rule
119

112: Noah seemed like a relatively uncommon name when we chose it, but according to the baby name wizard thingie, it was the #23 most popular boy's name last year.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:01 PM
horizontal rule
120

Noah seemed like a relatively uncommon name when we chose it

It's been uncanny, as my friends have had kids in the past couple of years, how every single couple wracks their brains for weeks and finally comes up with a name that strikes them as uncommon, and winds up picking one of the ten most common names of the year.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:05 PM
horizontal rule
121

Here's the older image directory, if you're bored.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
122

Thanks, apo! I am bored (or at least, valiantly avoiding doing work).


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
123

114: Possibly. I've had professors type up Math papers in Microsoft Word, but the equations you can get from the equation editor don't look right. The formatting and the way equations are displayed when using TeX or LaTeX is far superior--and once you learn the language, it's much faster than having to deal with word's interface. Plus, you can format your papers to meet whatever exacting publication standards you need without too much difficulty. It makes me happy.


Posted by: gea | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
124

120: Yep.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:11 PM
horizontal rule
125

Wow, I'd forgotten about most of those (like this one). So many posts...


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:12 PM
horizontal rule
126

114: Most other approaches (word, powerpoint, adobe, whatever) do a very poor job of typsetting mathematics. They used to do a horrifically bad job, so that's improvement I guess. I don't know how consistent it is in computer science these days, but math is pretty consistently done in some form of TeX or other relatively obscure systems.

It's also a better way to handle large documents. I'd hate to write a book or thesis in word, but it works well in latex. There are plenty of things TeX isn't well suited for, of course.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:15 PM
horizontal rule
127

120 -- we have had pretty good luck with "Sylvia".


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
128

We're pretty satisfied with Nathaniel, which is never obscure but always rare. Works as a Hebrew name too. I favor "old American" names, as a good place to start from. LB's are some of the best I've ever seen, familiar yet likely to be uncommon.

I might have been able to sell "Harry," now becoming more common, but "Elmer" wouldn't have been acceptable, I know. Ditto "Dolly."


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
129

I seem to be involved in a lot of thread-killing these days.

I ban myself.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
130

These are hedgehogs, no?


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
131

124 -- Funny, I haven't noticed many Newts among my peers' kids -- perhaps its a regional thing?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
132

Emacs + auctex + reftex + ispell is my LaTeX editing environment of choice.

There is nothing better. I've tried TexShop and quite liked it, but since I work on both PCs and on OS X the emacs based solution means that the environment is the same, whatever machine I use. Plus, if I can't do anything else, I'm able to ssh into a unix box I have a shell account on and work there in a terminal window using all the same commands.

I'd never go back to Word.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
133

128 -- "Fanny"?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:19 PM
horizontal rule
134

128: Nope. Five 'Newt's in our circle, and plenty of 'Sally's.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
135

I actually don't do any writing anymore, and I doubt I'd use Word if I had to write anything longer than 15 pages. But it's not so bad.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
136

133: Fanny is trouble, especially abroad, but so is Dick.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
137

130: Yes, they are hedgehogs. That was just the filename when I found the image, and it has since been linked so very widely (about every sixth or seventh myspace page) that I just left it as is.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:22 PM
horizontal rule
138

I have a secret beautiful English female baby name that I plan to spring on the world at some later date when a female baby whose name I am able to influence may appear. However, I'm not going to tell any of you fecund trendsetters what it is, because it could definitely go the Emma/Abigail/Olivia/Hannah route from obsolescence to omnipresence.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:22 PM
horizontal rule
139

135: It's horrible if you have anything but the most simple mathematics in the text. Otherwise, it's ok.

that ban didn't stick very well.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:24 PM
horizontal rule
140

120: Brand allegiances are not dissimilar.

129: It's illusory.

130: Disgusting.


Posted by: Charlie Whitaker | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:24 PM
horizontal rule
141

I favor "old American" names, as a good place to start from. LB's are some of the best I've ever seen, familiar yet likely to be uncommon.

So how are little Oscar and Gertrude doing?


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
142

If the current baby-to-be turns out to be a girl, I'm about 70% sold on Cassidy. I'm really struggling with boys' names, though. Keegan has stayed down below 200, but I think you're supposed to pick different names for subsequent children.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
143

"Old Canadian" would be my refuge if overtaken by the forces of mindmeld/Borg. "Wilfred." Bet DA knew of some "Wilfs" growing up, probably mostly old guys now.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
144

You could have a son and daughter, named Winfred and Winifred.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:29 PM
horizontal rule
145

re: 135

I use Word or OpenOffice for short documents, and like them both. I don't think Word is a terrible product for short reports and letters but for longer writing, with more complicated layouts, sections, subsections and so on, and with footnotes, and formulas, LaTeX is just so much better.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:30 PM
horizontal rule
146

The real pain in the ass is if you give your kid a rare name, and then 5 or 10 years later it becomes trendy.


Posted by: neil | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:32 PM
horizontal rule
147

"Old Canadian" would be my refuge if overtaken by the forces of mindmeld/Borg.

Oh, absolutely. In the process of doing something unrelated, I discovered here the nom de plume I'll use if my plume ever requires a nom.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:32 PM
horizontal rule
148

re: 146

An ex-girlfriend used to have a cousin called Kylie, who was about 4 when Kylie hit the UK as a pop-singer in the late 80s. She went through life with people thinking she was named after the singer.

'Celtic' names became very popular for a while, and friends of mine who were called Callum (or whatever) suddenly had names that sounded like trendy Londoners, when in fact it was, for example, their grandfather's name.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:34 PM
horizontal rule
149

So how are little Oscar and Gertrude doing?

Just fine, thanks, or any other name used for a Japanese Aircraft during WWII.

The name "Oscar" was selected by Captain, later Col. Frank T. McCoy, Jr., U.S.A.A.F., and his staff, founders of the code-name system. A native of Tennessee, McCoy tended to select "hillbilly" names such as "Zeke", "Rufe", and "Nate" — short, simple, but unusual enough to stick in the memory.

Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
150

Lois, my great grandmother's name, has not made the top 1000 since 1983. I predict that it will make it into the top 5 the exact year that I am ready to use it.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:42 PM
horizontal rule
151

My sister was named Zoe before it was well-known. Now it's a freakin' Muppet.


Posted by: neil | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
152

When I was thirteen, I got a hamster and named her "Simba," which I knew was Swahili for "lion." I thought that was pretty ironic and cute. Then that damn movie came out and I had to explain to everyone, "No, see, I got Simba before... nevermind."


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
153

So I should pick a name that could never turn suddenly popular, like Luberack or Lugnut.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:49 PM
horizontal rule
154

This is pretty hilarious.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:50 PM
horizontal rule
155

How about Adolf? That one is bound to be out of general use for a long time.


Posted by: neil | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:51 PM
horizontal rule
156

AWB, you might want to look at the front page.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:53 PM
horizontal rule
157

re:Adolf: Obama's middle name is "Hussein," another crowd-pleaser, even if you don't want bowling shoes.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 2:56 PM
horizontal rule
158

157: You may say this country isn't ready for a President named Adolf Hussein Osama, but I'm more optimistic.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:00 PM
horizontal rule
159

I have a secret beautiful English female baby name

Is it Chlamydia? I bet it's Chlamydia.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:10 PM
horizontal rule
160

That's a Latin name, Stanley.

It's not Scrofula either.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:15 PM
horizontal rule
161

156: Oh, I didn't see that! I saw it at Fastlad.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:16 PM
horizontal rule
162

Mr w-lfs-n, RE: 70: I am right now in the middle of editing a large LaTeX document with Lemmas and Theorems and the like in Emacs and I had never hear of RefTeX. God bless you, sir. This will change my life.


Posted by: Chris Conway | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
163

162: reftex is hella useful. It (and auctex) ought to replace the standard latex mode.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
164

I can't believe how many emacs partisans have been lurking in here. I feel like you all have told me you're furries or something.

*shiver*


Posted by: Magpie | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:38 PM
horizontal rule
165

164: It isn't emacs per se., I think, just that emacs + auctex + reftex is far and away the most productive latex system out there.

so really, we're latex partisans.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:41 PM
horizontal rule
166

Slighly shorter 165: Emacs = cryptic commands to generate cryptic commands to generate cryptic symbols.


Posted by: Chris Conway | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 3:49 PM
horizontal rule
167

LaTeX isn't cryptic at all. It's very transparent and the learning curve isn't steep. If you don't need formulas or complicated tables, it can be learnt in an afternoon.

Emacs, I'll admit, is much less transparent. But it is very good at what it does [apart from the fact that chording the ctrl commands in Emacs leads, in my experience, to hellish RSI if you overdo it].


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 4:10 PM
horizontal rule
168

167: I've spent every productive minute of the last three months in an Emacs window editing LaTeX. Love the stuff. Couldn't live with out. But, not cryptic? What are you smoking?


Posted by: Chris Conway | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 4:45 PM
horizontal rule
169

167: Helps if you move you ctrl key to the proper place...


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 4:51 PM
horizontal rule
170

168: I don't really get that either. Both basic latex and basic emacs are very straightforward. There are fiddly bits of both to learn if you need them, but those are mostly to do with complicated things.

Basic latex is just text with the odd \section{whatever}, perfectly intuitive. The math markup takes a little to get used to, but it's mostly intuitive once you get the hang of it, and it isn't like there are simpler systems... just horrible `visual' editors for math that don't do what you want anway and involve endless searching through menus. For anything non-trivial, anyway.

Emacs is much the same. By default, there is a simple text editor with mouse over, cut and paste etc. Sure, it doesn't have the default windows CUA bindings. But those bindings aren't so great, anyway, and they are hardly intuitive --- people are just used to them. I know people who use emacs like this all the time. They picked it up in half an hour and never use any powerful features.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 4:57 PM
horizontal rule
171

Yeah, the baby names thing is humbling. It really makes you realize that there's a lot to be said for generational styles when your preference for "unique, but not crazy like Rainbow or anything, maybe kinda old fashioned" turns out to be the same thing everyone else wants.

Luckily, PK's name has a built-in association that most grownups worry about saddling their kids with. But not us, because we're assholes like that.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 4:58 PM
horizontal rule
172

The geek comments need to cost $10 each.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 4:59 PM
horizontal rule
173

I just can't figure out why people aren't naming their kids "Lavender Moss" and "Volcano Aquarius" anymore. Or "Glory-be-to-God-persevere-against-sin". Doesn't anyone feel nostalgic for the good olde days?


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:04 PM
horizontal rule
174

If we're going to do topic-sensitive pricing, it's going to be $50 for each "feminist" comment (to be categorized at my discretion) and $500 for any comment that takes offense or has its feelings hurt.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:04 PM
horizontal rule
175

PK is named DahmermansonPhD.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:04 PM
horizontal rule
176

You need to wait probably another half generation for the hippie names to come back, I'd expect.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:06 PM
horizontal rule
177

PK's name has a built-in association that most grownups worry about saddling their kids with.

It seems like this association might have faded a bit in recent years.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:07 PM
horizontal rule
178

I basically only use emacs at an extremely rudimentary level.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:08 PM
horizontal rule
179

44: Ha, B-Wo - even compelled clicking will cause brand names to sink into your subconscious and lead you to purchase strange items you don't need from random advertisers. Or so one could lead them to believe.

Besides, we'd have no guarantee that Ogged wouldn't just take the money and buy himself a really big house and impress a really hott girrll and never, ever let any of us come over for a beer, much less all of that Cristal.

L'abus d'alcool est dangereux pour la santé. Consommer avec modération.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:11 PM
horizontal rule
180

If we're going to do topic-sensitive pricing, it's going to be $50 for each "feminist" comment (to be categorized at my discretion) and $500 for any comment that takes offense or has its feelings hurt.

I also propose increased pricing on any comment suggesting loss of a sense is not a handicap.

Also, discounted rates for teasing Teo about virginity.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:12 PM
horizontal rule
181

Dahmermanson is his first name, his first name is Islamorama.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:13 PM
horizontal rule
182

Dahmermanson ... Islamorama

Stanley, are you listening?


Posted by: standpipe b | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:14 PM
horizontal rule
183

nostalgic for the good olde days?

I would love to have used Prudence. But it wasn't on the table.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:18 PM
horizontal rule
184

I'd like to put a word in for obscure biblical names. They're not that bad! Really!


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:23 PM
horizontal rule
185

How about Obedienta?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:24 PM
horizontal rule
186

Marduk!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:24 PM
horizontal rule
187

Beelzebub Barnes is nicely alliterative.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:25 PM
horizontal rule
188

But Baal Barnes has that one-name, macho, quality. Plus, down South he'd be Baaly-Bob.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:27 PM
horizontal rule
189

One-syllable, I meant.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:28 PM
horizontal rule
190

One-syllable, I meant.

Not down South, I bet.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:29 PM
horizontal rule
191

Stanley, are you listening?

I am now that you caught my attention...


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:32 PM
horizontal rule
192

It's come to my attention that there was a people, the Jebusites, whom G-d was supposed to have driven out of the promised land along with the Caananites and sundry others. One assumes they worshipped Jebus, a nation ahead of their time.


Posted by: standpipe b | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
193

They drove a VW g-Bus out of the promised land.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:36 PM
horizontal rule
194

Crappy old comments box. How do you make this thing be funny?


Posted by: standpipe b | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:36 PM
horizontal rule
195

They drove a VW g-Bus out of the promised land

As decided in the storied Jebusite Plebiscite.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:37 PM
horizontal rule
196

heebie's got a good suggestion up in 185.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:38 PM
horizontal rule
197

I'd like to put a word in for obscure biblical names. They're not that bad! Really!

I agree, Hepzibah and Issachar are both cool names. It's hard to find one that doesn't make people assume you're Jewish, though.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:38 PM
horizontal rule
198

Crappy old comments box. How do you make this thing be funny?

One way to start is never to type "Jebus".


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:39 PM
horizontal rule
199

Keep the Biblical names in Hebrew, though.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:41 PM
horizontal rule
200

It's hard to find one that doesn't make people assume you're Jewish, though.

Or Mormon, or Amish.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:44 PM
horizontal rule
201

Shouldn't all you whiteys be naming your kids Mohammad or Fatima, to confound the government's oppressive screening strategies?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:45 PM
horizontal rule
202

Maybe Weep-not, Fly-debate, and Fight-the-good-fight-of-faith would actually be better. Then you'd be stereotyped as a WASP type. A WASP type from the late 17th century, but still.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
203

My parents found inspiration in names like Minnie Pearl and Chrystal Gayle in pulling my name out of their ass.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
204

80: I wear Trojans on my crank.


Posted by: minneapolitan | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:47 PM
horizontal rule
205

201: Shouldn't all you Shi'a be naming your kids Omar or AbuBakr, to confound the Mahdi Army's oppressive screening strategies?


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:48 PM
horizontal rule
206

Wait, I just made the thread sad. I ban myself and renounce any claim to profits from this thread's comments.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:49 PM
horizontal rule
207

It's okay to have a sad thread. Everybody cries, Ned.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:54 PM
horizontal rule
208

171: Is it ... Rumplestiltsken?!


Posted by: minneapolitan | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 5:54 PM
horizontal rule
209

Fatima's very pretty. I already had planned to give my hypothetical future Jewish daughter the middle name "Mary," after my grandma. Hmm: "We cordially invite you to the bat mitzvah of our daughter Fatima Mary"...


Posted by: Katherine | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 6:01 PM
horizontal rule
210

John Cole says "Eating anything is not a good idea atm." Ain't that the truth.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 6:15 PM
horizontal rule
211

Maybe the next trend will be infelicitously applied classical names like Octavius and Posthumous (especially the latter).


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 6:39 PM
horizontal rule
212

It's been uncanny, as my friends have had kids in the past couple of years, how every single couple wracks their brains for weeks and finally comes up with a name that strikes them as uncommon, and winds up picking one of the ten most common names of the year.

I think we've had this discussion before, but I honestly think that people's ideas of popular names are fixed when they're in high school, so when they're 25 or 30 and naming their children and hear a name on TV or read it in a book, they think that's it a rare name because no one they grew up with had it. It's not Kristen or Jessica or Jennifer or Caitlin, is Olivia, it's surely new. But every other set of parents is thinking the same thing.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 6:58 PM
horizontal rule
213

208 : B doesn't want to admit that she had a crush on Englebert Humperdinck when she was younger. [The composer, not the crooner.] It's tough on PK being known as "Humpy" around his school, but things could have been worse. She could have named him Hänsel. Or Bambi.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 7:21 PM
horizontal rule
214

"Woody"?


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 7:24 PM
horizontal rule
215

OTOH, the Offspring seems to deal just fine with being named "Northwest Orient Male Child Accompanied Minor Destination LAX". We call him Boeing for short.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 7:25 PM
horizontal rule
216

Posthumus Woody!


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 7:30 PM
horizontal rule
217

As decided in the storied Jebusite Plebiscite.

Blathering blatherskite.


Posted by: Fenton Crackshell | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 7:43 PM
horizontal rule
218

But every other set of parents is thinking the same thing

Yeah, but it's that they are seemingly thinking the same thing independently of everyone else that is sort of confounding.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 9:11 PM
horizontal rule
219

177: My thinking exactly. I mean, no one remembers Engelbert Humperdink any more.

174: $50 for feminist comments? So much for this whole "I'm not sexist" routine.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:09 PM
horizontal rule
220

That'll be $50, B.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:12 PM
horizontal rule
221

$50 for feminist comments? So much for this whole "I'm not sexist" routine.

I'm pretty sure it applies to feminist comments by men too.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:17 PM
horizontal rule
222

Women can have money now?

[/ducks!]


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:19 PM
horizontal rule
223

219 - The law in its majesty equally forbids the rich and poor to object to Selma Hayek ass shots.


Posted by: snarkout | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:25 PM
horizontal rule
224

Heh. Fifty years ago we'd have them upside down with a--

What? Do I shock you?


Posted by: standpipe b | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:27 PM
horizontal rule
225

220: File a lawsuit.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:32 PM
horizontal rule
226

My father wanted to name me Zephaniah. It would have been novel, but I think I'm glad I missed it and he settled for a (different) biblical middle name.


Posted by: Nathan Williams | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:35 PM
horizontal rule
227

225: How's that going, anyway?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:37 PM
horizontal rule
228

File a lawsuit.

Wine for winners!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:40 PM
horizontal rule
229

The other bullshit lawsuit? It went absolutely nowhere. Do you really think I'm that easy to bluff?


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 12-12-06 10:41 PM
horizontal rule
230

226: I was almost named Borghild Sigrid. Less inflamed minds chose something that would not, in future, sound like a member of a Star Trek collective


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 12-13-06 1:03 PM
horizontal rule