Re: That Labs Still Is One Goes Without Saying

1

Is someone calling her a slut?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:09 PM
horizontal rule
2

What I'm saying is that I don't understand the cause for your reflections.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:10 PM
horizontal rule
3

In polite society, the word "slut" has been all but retired, and not just the word, but the concept itself

I guess that depends on your definition of polite society. I still hear it used plenty, and not ironically.

No comment on Angelina Jolie; hasn't she been rather famously monogamously coupled these last few years?


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:11 PM
horizontal rule
4

Isn't the defining characteristic of a slut a large number of sexual partners? I don't know that Jolie is known for that.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:15 PM
horizontal rule
5

Don't forget that Teo and I were here in your time of need, running up your comment numbers. I want a little credit next time somebody threatens to liquidate me.

(Actually, to echo Ben: What was the chain of thoughts that led you to this question?)


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:27 PM
horizontal rule
6

You're right. I think that "slut," where used, is generally used to describe someone who is having sex with a lot of people for bad reasons. There is some lack of personal control associated with the indiscriminate sex. I don't think that's true of Jolie; if she has a lot of sex with a lot of different people, it's because she likes having sex with a lot of different people, and nothing more.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:27 PM
horizontal rule
7

Who took down the other post? I had an excellent pun dealing with anticlimactic endings on the way.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:32 PM
horizontal rule
8

In a conversation mere hours ago, a friend described Angelina as "slutty" and I argued. Turns out, my friend meant something more like erotic, or sensual, and didn't really grope long enough for the right word.


Posted by: susan | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:33 PM
horizontal rule
9

didn't really grope long enough

How insensitive!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:35 PM
horizontal rule
10

Talk about anticlimactic endings.


Posted by: susan | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:35 PM
horizontal rule
11

Jolie is plenty out of control, or has been. The difference is that she looks as though she could break you in two with her mind. And you don't say nasty things about such people.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:36 PM
horizontal rule
12

Who am I and what am I doing here? I was somewhere else, but it just disappeared.


Posted by: David Rice Atchison | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 10:46 PM
horizontal rule
13

Slut mostly just means 'woman who's sexuality I disapprove of'. It doesn't really mean 'woman who has a lot of partners' or anything like that, it's just a sexualized term of control for women who's sexuality is perceived as out of control. Jolie could be as chaste as Mother Teresa and she's still be called a slut by some people, because something about her will just trigger some people's 'she's too comfortable with her sexuality' radar.


Posted by: Nbarnes | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:01 PM
horizontal rule
14

I'm not sure I buy that, Nbarnes. I think the word does mean something to the people who use, and it seems to me that Jolie is less likely to be called a slut than other women who are similarly, if not identically, sensual/sexual.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:07 PM
horizontal rule
15

So what is the word for the female sexual predator? Predator not referring to pedophilia or whatever, but a woman who agressively seeks many temporary partners? One male term is stud.
In my day we had a gender-neutral term:"ball-freak" Is that still around?

Not that has anything to do with Jolie, and I don't know what ogged is talking about.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:08 PM
horizontal rule
16

Where's b when you need her?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:14 PM
horizontal rule
17

"ball-freak" Is that still around?

I've never heard it.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:16 PM
horizontal rule
18

Also never heard "ball freak."


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:19 PM
horizontal rule
19

Never heard it, either. Also, I never hear guys who sleep around a lot called "studs" anymore, except when the description is meant to be funny.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:26 PM
horizontal rule
20

"ball freak" a new one to me as well


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:26 PM
horizontal rule
21

"Player" is the new "stud," isn't it?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:27 PM
horizontal rule
22

So the brothers say.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:28 PM
horizontal rule
23

Jolie is slutty only if you take her appearance to be an advertisement for sex: if you believe her lips, for example, to be amplified, for the puffiness and redness associated with sexual arousal.

But lipstick does the same thing. (Sort of.)

I suppose the claim would be that Jolie's lips are over the top.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:32 PM
horizontal rule
24

I still hear "slut" used in the classic sense from time to time, but less than I used to, although this might be a result of getting older. I've always been fond of "whore".


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:32 PM
horizontal rule
25

I think this post answers definitively that yes you can troll on your own blog. It's been mentioned before, but now there can be no arguing it.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:32 PM
horizontal rule
26

17,18:What do I know? Maybe it was unique to our locale, or group. But I suppose "freak" isn't used anymore either.

We were all freaks, and most of us centered our lives around dope. Some few, of either gender, sought sex and trophies or conquests to the point they thought of little else;were not monogamous and rarely had sex with the same person twice; were not safe around your partner, especially if you cared. Mostly, tho not exlusively, hetero at that time. We called them "ball-freaks" without much hostility or judgement. Think Alfie or Swingers, or Dangerous Housewives. Whatever.

My question stands. " Promiscuous" doesn't quite make it, and "slut" carries too much baggage. Do y'all kids have a term?


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:33 PM
horizontal rule
27

Damnit, that last post should have just been:

"If I were to be sexist, this is how I would do it," by Ogged.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:34 PM
horizontal rule
28

Damnit, that last post should have just been:

"If I were to be sexist, this is how I would do it," by Ogged.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:34 PM
horizontal rule
29

Do y'all kids have a term?

"Skank" gets thrown around a bit.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:38 PM
horizontal rule
30

Dude, I troll my own blog all the time, but not in this post.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:40 PM
horizontal rule
31

"Skank" doesn't have the connotations of conquest that bob's looking for, though, I don't think.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:40 PM
horizontal rule
32

Ok, I don't troll it all the time, and definitely not in this post!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:46 PM
horizontal rule
33

"Ball freak" is a pretty good term. I think it meets the test of cromulence, outlined in the thread below. "Ball freak" it will be.

And I think the answer to ogged's question is: you don't insult intimidating people. It doesn't really matter what the insult is. Insults are rude for everyone, but where the object of the insult is a badass, you fabricate some special reason that it can't apply. "Slut" shouldn't apply to anyone. There's no special reason why it shouldn't apply to Jolie, except that she could kill you.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:46 PM
horizontal rule
34

So what is the word for the female sexual predator? Predator not referring to pedophilia or whatever, but a woman who agressively seeks many temporary partners? One male term is stud.

I've never actually heard a woman described in this way, but I think some people use the word "man-eater". You know, like the Hall and Oates song.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:53 PM
horizontal rule
35

"Ball freak" is a pretty good term.

If if heard "ball freak" applied to a guy, I'd think he was being called gay.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:54 PM
horizontal rule
36

Fuck, "If I"


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:54 PM
horizontal rule
37

Because she will fucking kill you.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 01- 6-07 11:57 PM
horizontal rule
38

I do think the intimidation is a big part of it, but it doesn't work to say that she'll kill you, because, obviously, you're a nobody and she'll never hear about it. (I also think there's something to SCMT's "self control" explanation.) Is there a neediness that's associated with sluttiness that she doesn't have? (And neediness is distinct from rapaciousness.)


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:03 AM
horizontal rule
39

What is it about Jolie that makes you think people would call her a slut, ogged?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:09 AM
horizontal rule
40

Is there a neediness that's associated with sluttiness

I think you're on to something here. Seems like I instinctually think of Angelina Jolie and Sophia Lauren differently than I do Christina Aguilera and Paris Hilton. Like the latter two try too hard.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:09 AM
horizontal rule
41

I don't understand 39. I'm saying people wouldn't call her a slut.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:12 AM
horizontal rule
42

I kind of think of it this way: "slutty" is somehow akin to "easy," which itself means that--for good or ill--you won't have to expend an inordinate amount of effort to get someone into bed. I don't think that the other person's effort makes a difference to someone like Jolie, except insofar as she wants to see you dance, monkey, dance. But you're not convincing her; she is merely selecting you from her harem.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:15 AM
horizontal rule
43

SCMT is on track. We used to call an out-of-control promsicuous male a "man-whore," which was pretty pejorative.

I still have some sort of internal distinction between promiscuous people (good) and sluts (bad) that's difficult to articulate or jusify, but it's centered around some notion of being in control or willing the outcome. That is, if you choose to have more parnters, more power to you, but if you rack up a big tally because you're lookig for something else in the wrong places, that's slutty. Does that mak any sense?


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:19 AM
horizontal rule
44

40 -

I disagree about Aguilera tryig too hard.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:20 AM
horizontal rule
45

I'm saying people wouldn't call her a slut.

But you seem to find that somehow remarkable. Why?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:21 AM
horizontal rule
46

45: Because people, like susan's friend, do wrongly refer to her as slutty.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:24 AM
horizontal rule
47

I disagree about Aguilera tryig too hard.

Ahem


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:25 AM
horizontal rule
48

46: That's not ogged's claim (which is, incidentally, dubious), though.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:26 AM
horizontal rule
49

35 would make sense for a person unfamiliar with the term "ballin.'"


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:27 AM
horizontal rule
50

would make sense for a person unfamiliar with the term "ballin.'"

I'm heard "ballin", but to me calling a guy "ball freak" would sound like he has an affinity for balls.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:31 AM
horizontal rule
51

Teo, my thinking was something like this: "slut" is usually taken to mean "a woman who has many sexual partners" or even "a woman who is (too) desirous of sex," but while both of those things are true of Jolie (as far as we know...persona...etc.), it seems to me that she's less likely to be called a slut that one might expect. I was wondering why that was, and whether that gives us more information about what "slut" means to the people who use it.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:32 AM
horizontal rule
52

I've never heard you ballin', gswift, and I don't want to start now.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:33 AM
horizontal rule
53

I wish I was a little bit taller / Wish I enjoyed testicles


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:33 AM
horizontal rule
54

I've never heard you ballin', gswift, and I don't want to start now.

Jesus. My typing is all over the place tonight.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:36 AM
horizontal rule
55

both of those things are true of Jolie (as far as we know...persona...etc.)

Really? I don't follow celebrity news closely, but I hadn't known she had that reputation. If so, that makes the post more understandable.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:37 AM
horizontal rule
56

Do you only know Jolie from her new Mother Teresa phase?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:39 AM
horizontal rule
57

No, but the impression I had of her reputation was more along these lines.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:41 AM
horizontal rule
58

Man, where have the good old days of "blood vial toting bisexual skank" gone?


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:46 AM
horizontal rule
59

The distinction between that and these is part of what I'm interested in. Off to bed...alone...


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:46 AM
horizontal rule
60

Okay then. I would just say that Jolie is a better fit for the "maneater" stereotype than the "slut" stereotype, and leave it at that.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:48 AM
horizontal rule
61

Although "slut" is also used as an all-purpose insult for women, and as such is sometimes applied to Jolie (see the link in 48).


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:50 AM
horizontal rule
62

Ogged needs a slut.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:50 AM
horizontal rule
63

He's not the only one.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:54 AM
horizontal rule
64

There's a certain amount of powerlessness that is sometimes associated with 'slut' that is clearly inaaplicable in Jolie's case. However, in response to ogged in 14, I'd say that, yes, a person does have something in mind when they say 'slut', but what it is that they have in mind is generally an impression rather than some Slut Rules, Useful In Fallen Woman Watching To Determine if You're Watching A Slut, Whore, or Bitch. And what constitutes a 'slut' varies from person to person. You can trivially find people that would agree in the hypothetical that a woman who posed nude for Playboy is a slut, even if she's a virgin.


Posted by: Nbarnes | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:44 AM
horizontal rule
65

Man, where have the good old days of "blood vial toting bisexual skank" gone?

Her whore days are behind her. Now she's in her Madonna phase.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 6:12 AM
horizontal rule
66

There's a certain amount of powerlessness that is sometimes associated with 'slut' that is clearly inaaplicable in Jolie's case.

This is pretty much it. Ths topic is distasteful, given that it implies that there is a category of women correctly addressed as sluts, and that it's therefore a matter of linguistic interest to define that term precisely. ("See, nigra is for when they're uppity. If they're doing a nice, respectful job on the yard work, polite people call them colored folk.")

But what I think Ogged is thinking of is the element of passivity. A high school girl who gets raped by the football team is going to get called a slut for having been at the party at all and having had a drink first. A slut was 'Asking for it', in the sense that implies, you know, not actually asking for it. In less hyperbolic terms, slutty implies overly compliant with male desires, not overly desirous herself, and that doesn't look like a good description of Jolie.

But you know? I'd be just as happy if the fine linguistic distinctions governing what sort of contempt we were supposed to hold various women in for having sex were allowed to fade off into the mists of time.

(This seriously wasn't trolling? Man, Ogged, some days I worry about you.)



Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 6:13 AM
horizontal rule
67

Mineshaft I need your help: how the hell do you insert a "fold" into a blog post? Using blogger, to the extent that matters. I thought for sure I could answer this with google in 5 minutes, but have been searching over an hour now. Need an answer quickly, if anyone's awake. Mmm... those biscuits smell good...


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 6:17 AM
horizontal rule
68

I've never used Blogger's interface, Brock, so maybe there is more recent info than this, but Google's first pass says you need to edit your templates.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 6:46 AM
horizontal rule
69

The word implies a certain pathological neediness to me, and I wouldn't think to use it on a rape victim. There're people, though, who're certain that the victim was looking for it, at some level, and so they can use the term in the sense that I think of it.

I don't use the word to refer to actual people, any more than I do the N word (as indicated in 66).

I guess the interesting sociolinguistic (or whatever the right adjective is here) question is whether a couple of 'brothers' who like and more or less respect can use it on each other in a humorous way -- neither of whom would appreciate it's use by a third party. This works, in addition, because the connotation of pathological neediness is inapplicable: if O really thought FL was that way, he wouldn't use the term. (Unless he's a jerk at a level beyond anything under current consideration).


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 7:56 AM
horizontal rule
70

Apo- thanks. What a pain.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:03 AM
horizontal rule
71

Kudos to SB for the hilarious Skee-lo reference.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:05 AM
horizontal rule
72

Does Brock have a blog?


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:12 AM
horizontal rule
73

A high school girl who gets raped by the football team is going to get called a slut for having been at the party at all and having had a drink first. A slut was 'Asking for it', in the sense that implies, you know, not actually asking for it.

Really don't buy that. I can believe that people will claim that a girl who alleges rape was not actually raped and was "slutty" and "asking for it." But no one does or ever has said "Yes, she was raped, and therefore she's a slut." But you're right that the word seems to only be used as an unfair cudgel; I can't think of another way that it gets used.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
74

I can't think of another way that it gets used.

O RLY?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
75

66: But no one does or ever has said "Yes, she was raped, and therefore she's a slut."

But LB's point was specifically not this, right? I thought her post was referring to the various workarounds that tend to arrive at "she was a slut, so it couldn't have been rape." And that's perfectly accurate.

As far as specific slang for sexually powerful or dominant woman goes, "cougar" is current in my neck of the woods but used specifically to mean women over 30 who aggressively hook up with guys in their late teens / early twenties. I've never heard it used anywhere else though, so it could be a Western Canadian thing (or maybe an import from the Maritimes).


Posted by: Doctor Slack | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
76

I hear "slut" used casually all the time in the sense of "Easy to convince" and it's not at all limited to the sexual. For example, "Kelly's a coffee/electronics slut, we can get he/r to go to Starbuck's/Fry's even when it's cold and raining". And I've never heard "ball freak".


Posted by: Biohazard | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
77

I thought "cougar" originated in the Marina district of SF. But anyway, it's mainstream. I've heard it on "How I Met Your Mother," at least.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
78

77: I will defend my 40 years old Midwestern hippie patois to the death, unless the OED comes calling, in which case, for the sake of immortality, I made it up.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 9:37 AM
horizontal rule
79

And the original had a hyphen. Maybe I'll get two entries.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 9:38 AM
horizontal rule
80

A slut, basically, is a woman who has sex more than (whoever's using the term) would, or easier than that person would, or is more sexual than that person thinks she should be, etc. It is, as previously mentioned, little more than a term to regain control of a woman who is seen as acting out of control, or without regard for (whosever) preferences about her sexuality.

Pretty much any sexual behavior or even implication is sufficient to call a woman a slut, because the word doesn't have any solid definition besides "more sexual than I think she should be."

There seems also to be a sort of logical disconnect where a woman can be acting "slutty" -- say, a girl at a hs football party who's had a couple drinks and is out socializing -- where the person using the term both disapproves of her behavior and approves of it: they want her to be "slutty" because then they have a chance at being with her in some hypothetical way, but they also use the word/concept to put blame on her for being that way. I don't really know of any other way to express what I mean here except to call it contempt for women in general. She is an object to be used, fantasized about, "enjoyed," but as a person she is a bad person for "allowing" herself to be such an object.

Ya really just can't win.

[/incoherent ramble]


Posted by: amanda | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
81

Eighty comments and no one defends my honor?


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
82

As penance for this thread, we must all watch the made-for-HBO movie Gia today.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 10:43 AM
horizontal rule
83

As penance for this blog, we must all cast ourselves into the sea.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
84

Hasn't the term "freak" been applied in the same sense as this "ball-freak" for about the past 15-20 years? Certainly in hip-hop argot, that's the dominant meaning of the noun form. E.g. the scene in Next Friday (Steve Carr, 2000) where Ice Cube's character walks into his rich uncle's suburban love den, which is festooned with all sorts of sex toys and BDSM equipment and says "Damn Unc', youse a freak!"

"Playa" and "Player" seem to be somewhat passé at this point. It causes me no end of amusement, however, to see young men who affect a "hard" hip-hop style walking around in t-shirts that proclaim the wearer to be "100% Hustler" or the like. It's the kind of linguistic confusion that could get you into a lot of trouble, depending on the context.


Posted by: minneapolitan | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
85

82 and 83: Is that movie terrible or good? I ask, because casting oneself into the sea might not be all that penitential if it was a nice sea. Are these parallel statements?


Posted by: Bostoniangirl | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
86

it implies that there is a category of women correctly addressed as sluts

No, it doesn't. You can ask what people who use a term mean by it, even if you don't endorse the beliefs that motivate the use, just like you can ask what Christians mean by "heathen."


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 11:00 AM
horizontal rule
87

85: It's terrible.


Posted by: DS | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
88

Cougar is pretty common now in American cities (or at least I've heard it in LA, DC, and NY), and certainly pejorative. Canonical cougar would be 35-40, recently divorced, and out partying with much younger guys. The mean stereotype would hold that the cougar may be less conventionally attractive, but she's a freak (cf other posts) and thus worth paying attention to. The positive view, if there is one, is sexual empowerment, and broadening of younger dude's horizons.

I'm kind of sad that I know which bars in Pasadena are known as cougar bars, and know several dudes who are 'into the cougar scene.'


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:00 PM
horizontal rule
89

and certainly pejorative

For gawd's sake, why?

I'm kind of sad that I know which bars in Pasadena are known as cougar bars,

For gawd's sake, why?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:05 PM
horizontal rule
90

I don't know anyone who'd be flattered to be described as a "cougar" with any seriousness. Going into "the cougar scene" is something that a lot of guys will joke about as a form of standard-lowering, or the kind of things you do on a dare. Ironically I think it's a term more unambiguously negative than "slut" is now.


Posted by: DS | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:19 PM
horizontal rule
91

Brock: "extendable posts" is what the Blogger help menu calls the "fold." I should warn you that I hate the extendable post format that Blogger provides; it automatically provides a fold for every post, whether you need it or not. Maybe the Beta version has cleaned up that problem, maybe someone come up with a hack to fix it, but I hate the whole system and good luck to you.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
92

For gawd's sake, why?

One suspects that ever since slut got coopted, there was a vacuum in the space of ways to be an asshole.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:32 PM
horizontal rule
93

Not only is my character defamed, but I'm made to think of Garth Brooks lyrics:

I went to work for her that summer
A teenage kid so far from home
She was a lonely widow woman
Hell-bent to make it on her own
We were a thousand miles from nowhere
Wheat fields as far as I could see
Both needing something from each other
Not knowing yet what that might be.
'Til she came to me one evening
Hot cup of coffee and a smile
In a dress that I was certain
She hadn't worn in quite a while
There was a difference in her laughter
There was a softness in her eyes
And on the air there was a hunger
Even a boy could recognize.
She had a need to feel the thunder
To chase the lightning from the sky
To watch a storm with all its wonder
Raging in her lover's eyes

Unsurprisingly, I had to listen to this song about being exploited at work while being exploited at work.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
94

Kids today are insane. A set of women with whom you never had a shot in past has decided to put you on the "will potentially sleep with" list, and you see this as a negative. I fear for our country.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
95

Who wants to feel my thunder?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
96

Have we reached a procedure for the pictures with labs quandary?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
97

#8 (and ogged most likely) -
the correct word for Jolie would be 'sultry'. From merriam-webster online:
Sultry -
2 a : hot with passion or anger b : exciting or capable of exciting strong sexual desire


Posted by: Lee | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
98

I watched her hands of leather turn to velvet in a touch; and there's never been another summer when I ever learned so much.

Ben, I do not know the status of that. I'm confused about where these pictures are, where they will be, and who will see them.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
99

But no one does or ever has said "Yes, she was raped, and therefore she's a slut."

Actually, in places where "the woman's honor" is important and the Virgin/Mother/whore alternatives are the only ones, women who are raped are always suspect because they didn't fight hard enough. Within the world of Islam especially, but also elsewhere.

I think that "slut" usually means a woman with low self-esteem who is willing to be used. Maybe it means unscrupulous sexually-aggressive women too, but I think that when it's used this way, the idea is to accuse sexually-aggressive women of having low self-esteem and being willing to be used. "Skank" seems to mean an unattractive slut with additional personal problems.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
100

which bars in Pasadena are known as cougar bars

Jesus Christ, where were these bars when I was in college? I'd have been all over that.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
101

96.--Oh, sorry, I'll get around to posting those this afternoon. Chopper very kindly photoshopped the Ayatollah onto the Gay, if you know what I mean.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 12:57 PM
horizontal rule
102

They were in Pasadena, apostropher, and you were in North Carolina.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:03 PM
horizontal rule
103

Can someone send me the photoshop? It sounds hilarious.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
104

FL, aren't you on the Flickr group? There already are a couple of photos of you with the Ayatollah's head (and Bérubé's). I'll send you an invite.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:07 PM
horizontal rule
105

Is there any way today's games will compare to the Romo-tastrophe? I have money in Vegas on the Pats to win the Super Bowl at 6-1 so have a certain loyalty.

I also have the NYG at 50-1 to win the Super Bowl, but that's just pathetic.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:07 PM
horizontal rule
106

Thanks, JM; no one had invited me. I'll just sit here in the dark, sobbing.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:10 PM
horizontal rule
107

Check your email, foolio, and come into the light.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:11 PM
horizontal rule
108

Those are awesome photos, but none are of me. Am I at the right group?


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:15 PM
horizontal rule
109

Oh, yes, if I had checked my flickr inbox...


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:16 PM
horizontal rule
110

Many of the ones of you that Armsmasher and Stanley had were removed—at your request.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:18 PM
horizontal rule
111

I have money in Vegas on the Pats to win the Super Bowl at 6-1 so have a certain loyalty.

Love Belichick, but I don't see that happening.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:20 PM
horizontal rule
112

Did I say that? I just wanted to look at them first.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:20 PM
horizontal rule
113

FL: email me (link below), and I'll send them on. My plan was to send them to Chopper for (in)appropriate head replacement. That is, Chopper is going to give you head, if you approve.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:22 PM
horizontal rule
114

Groovy.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:24 PM
horizontal rule
115

I just posted the beChoppered photos of you to the group pool, FL you little narcissist.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
116

What is with the referee's pants? Did I miss when they started looking like waiters?


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
117

There's your Romo-esque play for you, NL.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:29 PM
horizontal rule
118

I had forgotten that lap dance. Ben never will, I fear.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:30 PM
horizontal rule
119

Actually, I had forgotten it too.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 1:45 PM
horizontal rule
120

Anyone else rooting for the Iggles?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
121

In 7th grade I went to a girls' school, and in a study hall overseen by a popular biology teacher (a man) some 8th grade girls were discussing someone not present and referred to her as a slut. I had never heard the word before. The teacher paused the study hall to give a little discourse on the inappropriateness of this word--how it was a way of cruel rumor mongering, using a label for shorthand to imply all kinds of other actions without speficity or verifiability, and passing judgement on people's personal lives without real knowledge. But, more importantly, he said that as denizens of a feminist institution we should abhor using such a word asymmetrically. I'm probably the only person who took him seriously. I use the word symetrically, and only in angry, private rants with friends where it really is shorthand for actions already carefully enumerated and understood, not a generic label. And I do not mean "easy" as in. . so and so should be having less sex, says I, the matron. I use it to angrily refer to people who engage in sex or sexual acts regardless of how self or other-destructive those acts are, because they place more value on their ability to set those acts up/enjoy them then on the feelings of others or the havoc they are wrecking on their own lives. I use it in a specific sexual context because it applies to personalities who use the cover of everyone being so worried about being judgemental about sex to forestall any consequences or criticism. They use the fact that educated, liberal people are worried about being seen as prudes to cover up the fact that people do have special feelings about sex, and sex is uniquely powerful in human relations. Instead of being more prudent around this powerful aspect of human life, they are less prudent, because if anyone calls them on their cruelty or self-destructiveness, they can shame them into silence by calling them puritanical. This pisses me off, b/c the real problem is the cruelty. So in anger I frequently note that there is a tiny grain of truth at the root of our tiptoeing around sex, and if people are stressed out about it, it's precisely b/c of selfish, malicious, or reckless people like these. They are the original sluts.
I know more guys than women, so I end up using it about guys more.

I would not, however, say that these private rants consist of polite company---the density of curse words in my speech usually goes up by a factor of 5 or 6.
I am totally baffled by the notion of applying such discussions to celebrities.

But I'm also the only person I know who is immune to both Jolie's looks (fine, not fantastic, to me) and alleged intimidation factor.


Posted by: Ile Has | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
122

My only way to generate personal NFL loyalty is to place wagers. So sadly I must pull for Eli and Plizzaxico.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 2:53 PM
horizontal rule
123

I'm doing what now?


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 2:56 PM
horizontal rule
124

120 -- Iggles, w00t. Partially because of all the rumor and innuendo about Jeff Garcia being teh ghey, which just makes me want to root for him more. Partially because I hates the Tom Coughlin.

Although this game is shaping up to be pretty boring. Three drives that start from the 50 and go backwards? Bleh.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
125

Scrunchies? No, no, no. What you need is the Silicone Beauty Brush, which will "exfoliate redundant horniness" and "retrieve glowing and gentle skin", but most importantly, "wash face with the brush can save face cleaning milk".


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
126

Iggles here too. But only because the Broncos didn't make it in.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:29 PM
horizontal rule
127

Westbr00k!! He will not be denied. I assume some of you are watching this game too?

I'm looking forward to the offense-vs-defense matchup of Colts at Ravens, next week.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
128

offense-vs-defense matchup of Colts at Ravens

Ravens 38-17.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:32 PM
horizontal rule
129

I'm sort of watching; more like running back and forth between watching and commenting. The TV's at the other end of the house.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:33 PM
horizontal rule
130

Mmm... I root against Brian Billick and Ray Lewis on principle. Colts, 24-14.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:33 PM
horizontal rule
131

I should probably just go watch.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:34 PM
horizontal rule
132

Ygglz is rooting for the Giants. For once, we're rooting for the same team. But I have no stakes in the playoffs now.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:34 PM
horizontal rule
133

Come back after the big plays. Also, time to get wireless -- laptop-in-front-of-the-tv is the perfect way to think you're going to get work done while watching football. "Work" ends up being "trolling unfogged."

Sheldon!


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
134

There are games today? I thought everyone was just getting pumped for tomorrow.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
135

'smasher, were you on the Romo-bandwagon?


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
136

Now that I realize that Brian Westbrook and Michael Westbrook aren't the same person, I'm enjoying that run even more. Athlete.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:38 PM
horizontal rule
137

What I don't understand is why they don't broadcast the entire game from the camera-that-floats-above-the-field. Tres video game -- the side-view is a holdover from an older and more naive age.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:39 PM
horizontal rule
138

Goddamn, but Eli is incapable of learning how to be a pro quarterback.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
139

Also: Tony Romo: can you say rollercoaster? What a year that guy had.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
140

One wonders how Carrie Underwood comforted him.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:41 PM
horizontal rule
141

I still have a soft spot in my heart for Bledsoe. I was kinda hoping they'd pull Romo and put in Drew at the end... seeing him on the sidelines made me glum.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:43 PM
horizontal rule
142

I still have a soft spot in my heart for Bledsoe.

After taking the hit that sheared the artery in his chest, Bledsoe probably does, too.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:46 PM
horizontal rule
143

I think they should put in Drew to take the snaps on field goals. I do heart Romo.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:46 PM
horizontal rule
144

Shockey's kind of awesome.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:48 PM
horizontal rule
145

I wish Eli would grow a beard or something.

Maybe he can't?

Steven Colbert stole his screaming eagle straight from the tat on Shockey's arm.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 3:51 PM
horizontal rule
146

Did anyone else see the clips of Peyton playing football as a child during the Colts game yesterday?


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:04 PM
horizontal rule
147

They've played those before this season.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:07 PM
horizontal rule
148

Yes! Apparently he's always been a little whiner.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:07 PM
horizontal rule
149

I guess.

I've always thought of Peyton Manning as kind of the Al Gore of football.

Jeff!!1!


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:08 PM
horizontal rule
150

149 was written before I saw 148, just to be clear.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:09 PM
horizontal rule
151

What's Philly singing? They have a song?


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:10 PM
horizontal rule
152

I was wondering the same thing -- football is slowly approaching the crowd-standard set by European football.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:10 PM
horizontal rule
153

"Fly, Eagles, Fly" says a Philly friend.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:15 PM
horizontal rule
154

... and then they run a draw?

Blah. Time to go buy more Tostitos.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:16 PM
horizontal rule
155

I'm on dialup, yo. Not much point to wireless.

I should go buy some more salsa.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:28 PM
horizontal rule
156

Salsa can't be bought, it can only be created by passion on the dance floor.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:31 PM
horizontal rule
157

Damn world music.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:43 PM
horizontal rule
158

Something I have just now learned: Whole Foods organic salsa == teh suck. Way, way too watery.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 4:48 PM
horizontal rule
159

The hefty lefty! The round mound of touchdown! JARED LORENZEN!


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 5:30 PM
horizontal rule
160

I can't stop staring at Plaxico. What a weird and awesome physique. Is his neck longer than Merton Hanks'?


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 5:45 PM
horizontal rule
161

The Giants just need to let Philly score RIGHT NOW. I don't know why football coaches don't get that. They cannot stop Philly, and the clock will run out. (Last football comment)


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 5:53 PM
horizontal rule
162

Did you know Merton Hanks is now an NFL official? Gotta love his Wikipedia quote -- "what a lame claim to fame that is."

Nice kick, btw.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
163

Woo!


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 6:01 PM
horizontal rule
164

Hopefully, this will be the last we see of Tom Coughlin in the pros for a while. Maybe he can go yell at some college kids for a couple of years.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 6:03 PM
horizontal rule
165

Getting fired is, apparently, the final axiom of football.

What we must be all about right now, immediately, is the restoration of pride; self pride, team pride, the restoration of our professionalism and the dignity of which we conduct our business. We must restore our belief in the process by which we will win. We must replace despair with hope and return the energy and the passion to New York Giant football.

From a technical standpoint we must begin to focus immediately on the basic axioms which determine winning in the National Football League. Effort is the key to success. Consistent application of each individual, each individual's best in the task at hand. Outstanding effort must exist on many levels. It starts with the off-season program. It starts in the spring, carries through the summer to the practice field and training camp and of course to game day. Football is fundamentally a physical game. It is a tough game played by tough people. We must win the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. We must run the ball and we must be able to defend the run. The year off that I have experienced allowed me to make many observations, one of which is - more games are lost in this league than are won. We must eliminate turnovers.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 7-07 8:06 PM
horizontal rule
166

"Polite society" *never* called anyone a slut. Polite society doesn't recognize sluts, and never did.

But if you meant that we know better now than to think that way, try doing a post about Paris Hilton and see what happens.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 10:32 AM
horizontal rule
167

I'm late to the party on this one, but it's inappropriate to call Jolie a slut because she's had approximately four sexual relationships in the last ten years.


Posted by: Hamilton Lovecraft | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 11:21 AM
horizontal rule
168

Around here, that's slutty -- unless you married a succession of cops killed in the line of duty, and only if you waited a full year in between before even dating.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
169

167: She was quoted fairly recently (just pre-Brad) that she has a number of friends with benefits, so that number sounds low to me.


Posted by: Magpie | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 12:41 PM
horizontal rule
170

So -- 93 yd runback? And now it's 7-7. At least I'm not stuck with watery salsa, this time around.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 6:44 PM
horizontal rule
171

And the opening Ohio St. drive is pretty much a disaster -- maybe I need to rethink my "Florida is going to get crushed" stance.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 6:53 PM
horizontal rule
172

Ohio St., not so much, hmmm?


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 7:21 PM
horizontal rule
173

OSU, waking up?


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 7:29 PM
horizontal rule
174

I certainly hope so. Nice coupla moves that Pittman (?) put on at least one or two Florida players.

I root against Fla on principle, and I feel sorta sports-queasy at the moment.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 7:31 PM
horizontal rule
175

Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water...

I can't get a handle on this game. I feel like Fla should be up by more than 7.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 7:49 PM
horizontal rule
176

Gonzalez has a 4.0 in philosphy and is on a major team?! Either OSU has a very weak philospohy program or he is pretty good.

I note he wants to go to Stanford. Sorry Ben, he wants to go to the law school.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 7:54 PM
horizontal rule
177

4th and 1 on their own 30, and they go for it?? And they don't make it? Holy shit.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 8:02 PM
horizontal rule
178

I liked the going for it. I was impressed by Florida's defensive push. OSU could not push through that scrum.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 8:06 PM
horizontal rule
179

I know they only "settled" for a field goal, but ... game over man, game over. The dishes are done. OSU will need a collective brain transplant in the locker room, if they're going to come back from in this one.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 8:08 PM
horizontal rule
180

Yeah, this is over. I can't believe OSU is playing this poorly.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 8:15 PM
horizontal rule
181

Utterly insane. 20 points down at the half? Who knew that Ted Ginn Jr. was the sum-total of the OSU offense? Unless this hail-mary at the end of the half works...


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 8:16 PM
horizontal rule
182

Nope! Put a fork in em.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 8:19 PM
horizontal rule
183

A smack-down of epic proportions. I love the crowd shots of the Florida fans -- never have so few done so much for so many toolz.


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 9:44 PM
horizontal rule
184

This was a horrible waste of time.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 9:55 PM
horizontal rule
185

Don't say that, 'Smasher! When life gives you lemons, make lemonade!


Posted by: Barack Obama | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 10:10 PM
horizontal rule
186

When life gives you lemons, Smasher, just renumber their comments!


Posted by: arthegall | Link to this comment | 01- 8-07 10:18 PM
horizontal rule