Re: Qutbin' It

1

you'd come across the picture of someone with his/her ex when you were flipping through an old photo album with them, and there'd be a brief moment of "oh, yeah..." before moving on.

You left out the part about ripping that person out of the photo and then tearing up his/her image into little bitty bits and throwing it on the floor and stamping on them. Sometimes some burning involved too.

I never followed such a protocol myself, but I'm told it's standard.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 12:17 PM
horizontal rule
2

I'm not sure I understand -- do you just want people to delete pictures of old relationships?

Actually, if I were in a relationship with someone I'd probably want them to take the pictures of the ex off their flickr account. Okay to save them burned to a CD somewhere in the bottom of a drawer, but posting them to Flickr is a little too much like having them displayed around one's apartment.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
3

And I'm not ashamed to admit that I have no idea what the title of this post means. Should I be?


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 12:22 PM
horizontal rule
4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayyid_Qutb


Posted by: joeo | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
5

Ogged, they're all bad people who are going to hell. Don't sugar-coat the pill.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 12:44 PM
horizontal rule
6

ogged: Do you think there's a difference in the way younger folk approache relationships and the way old people do? (I do.) Do you suspect that their way is better? (I do.)


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
7

Do you suspect that their way is better?

Only if getting into heaven doesn't matter to you.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
8

How do you think they're different, SCMT?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:04 PM
horizontal rule
9

Is the idea supposed to be that the young people these days go into a relationship expecting there to be exes, and that most information about those exes is permanently and publicly stored?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:17 PM
horizontal rule
10

This young/old dichotomy is crap.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
11

In many ways, I am not of this generation awesome.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
12

I share ogged's feelings about this (but not in a prescriptive way). For me what's weird isn't so much the idea of the new S.O. seeing the ex on Flicker, as the ex having to see the new S.O.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:49 PM
horizontal rule
13

I would forgive the young people of today if they had casual sex with me instead of always just with each other. Forgiveness would be so easy to get, but they're heedless.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:51 PM
horizontal rule
14

4: Oh, so you're saying Ogged got a bad haircut.


Posted by: Magpie | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
15

12: that happened to me. The ex- complained I was flaunting the new relationship, even though several months had passed. (Of course, the ex- is several years older and probably just doesn't understand.)


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
16

several months had passed

You're not even supposed to be out of half-mourning at that point.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
17

8: It's tough to say (because I'm not sure), and doubly tough to say briefly (because I feel like it's complicated), but something like JM in #9. In some way, the kids today seem less angsty about sex than I was/probably am. They've diminished the importance of it without demeaning it, and I see that as wildly beneficial both to relationships and individuals.

OTOH, their teen romcom's suck.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
18

12 makes a lot more sense than the original post.

15: I have non idea who your ex is, obviously, but it would be hard for her to be cuter than eek. You can't entirely blame her.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
19

I think the kids today are just differently angsty, not less so. Angst springs eternal.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
20

Like, the ones who aren't getting laid, or are only getting laid once or twice a year, and get all freaked out about it. Damnit, back in the old days we were *glad* to get laid once in a blue moon....


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
21

You're not even supposed to be out of half-mourning at that point

Isn't there some goofy equation for how long one is to mourn? Is the time for the the breaker-upper different from the breakee-upee?


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:14 PM
horizontal rule
22

*uppee


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:15 PM
horizontal rule
23

I don't think 22 fixes 21.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
24

Whatever, Clowny, you know what I meant, right?


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
25

If there's an equation, I don't know it.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
26

I don't mean a real equation, but sort of like that "half+seven" thing (and all its variants) for age differences.

I was thinking something like (0.25) x (total time spent dating).

Clearly, I'm insane.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:22 PM
horizontal rule
27

No, I've heard that too, Stanley, but I can't remember the equation now either.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
28

i feel like i've always heard it was half the time you were in the relationship. that might have been from a SATC episode. and we should all sincerely hope it is not true.


Posted by: catherine | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:23 PM
horizontal rule
29

Considering the breaker-up's reason is starting with new, if s/he hasn't already, and the non-breaker is often surprised and in need of mourning, a different time is practically a given.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
30

My vague recollection is also half the time; that seems both way too long and just about right.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
31

There's more a mourning obligation for the breaker-upper, right? If the breaked-upon gets over things quickly, no harm no foul. But this ignores that 90% of cases are mutual.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
32

This young/old dichotomy is crap.

Get off my lawn, whippersnapper.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:27 PM
horizontal rule
33

Half the time is ridiculously long.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
34

Were you the b'upper or the b'uppee, Stanley? If you were the b'uppee, then your ex- complaining about you flaunting a new relationship seems pretty f'upped.

Even if you were the b'upper, I can see her thinking ill of you for flaunting. But actually telling you about it is just pathetic and/or disturbingly controlling, so you obviously made the right choice.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:29 PM
horizontal rule
35

half the time makes sense if the relationship was short. We need a logarithmic function. Or something.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:29 PM
horizontal rule
36

34: It was a mix of mutual breakage, but I made the final no-really-that's-it-for-real break. And yes, definitely, on making the right choice.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:31 PM
horizontal rule
37

Of course, I still think ill of you for flaunting.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:32 PM
horizontal rule
38

37: Of course.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
39

Every time I've heard the "half the time" equation -- which is certainly the most common c.w. in my experience -- there was a cap of something like one or two years.


Posted by: Rousseau | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:34 PM
horizontal rule
40

I think I've heard the half the time thing, but more in a "that's how long it will take you to really psychologically be done with it" than in a "that's what's proper" way.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:36 PM
horizontal rule
41

"Isn't there some goofy equation for how long one is to mourn?".

My mom waited for 3-4 years for her fiance in WWII. Then when he was liberated (he'd been captured) he married someone else. My mom was heart-broken and cried for three days.

"Three days!?" said my sisters. "You should have cried for at least a month!"

Within a month she married my Dad, whom she'd known for 2-3 weeks, and lived happily ever after.

Her fiance is still alive at 94. We found a picture of him on the internet (he has a unique non-American name) right before my mom died and showed it to her. He was the star member of a fitness club.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
42

9 is pretty close. It's not that we expect that relationships are temporary, exactly, but more that we accept that chances are good that after a break-up, the ex will be, if not friends, probably in the person's circle of friends and acquaintances, for some time. This is true especially of my college circle. People would be friends for a couple years, date, and then break up, but they're all friends with each other's friends, so the option are either to split the friends, ostracize one person, or grow up, ignore each other for a while, and then be friends again.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
43

I am apparently punctuating my sentences by taking a handful of commas and whipping them at the text.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
44

Comma shuriken!


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:48 PM
horizontal rule
45

a SATC episode

I only just this minute realized that the name of that show is Sex and the City and not Sex in the City.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:49 PM
horizontal rule
46

I always thought it was "Sexing the City"

announcing it to everybody doesn't make it ok to whip me with commas.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:52 PM
horizontal rule
47

45: Didn't realize it 'till you pointed it out, big guy. And I liked the first few seasons of that show.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:52 PM
horizontal rule
48

45 gets it exactly right.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:52 PM
horizontal rule
49

31: 90%? You're joking, right?


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:57 PM
horizontal rule
50

I've said it before, but this business of taking your lovers from among your circle of friends and acquaintances, and expecting to return to that relationship afterwards, seems odd to me. It occurs to me this might be more natural to people who actually have a circle of friends, but still.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
51

no.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
52

90%? You're joking, right?

My observations say that something like 90% of (hetero) break-ups are initiated by the female and are mutual only in the sense that one partner doesn't take the other as a hostage.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
53

It doesn't return to the same thing. It couldn't. It's just that there's no easy way to cut the person out of your life when they're rooming with your best friend, so you deal.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:02 PM
horizontal rule
54

See, healthier. Really, we ought to think about implementing some sort of Logan's Run policy, for the good of the country.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:04 PM
horizontal rule
55

90% seems high to me, unless by 'mutual' we mean 'one party initiates the break-up but the other person doesn't stalk them or cry on the phone after them and moves on maturely.'

I got dumped shortly after starting graduate school, but if we want to get technical, he said he didn't love me any more but didn't want to break up, and two weeks later I told him to go to hell. Was that mutual? Seems not to me, but at the point where we broke up, I wasn't interested in fighting for it any more.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:05 PM
horizontal rule
56

I'm guessing you're on board with the free sex, but not so much the life clock and age-coordinated clothing.

Renew! Renew!


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:06 PM
horizontal rule
57

I don't know from marriages, but when people are dating, it's not that hard to see that your partner is dissatisfied. That in itself can cause dissatisfaction. I don't mean that most break-ups are desired equally, but that they don't exactly come out of the blue.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:08 PM
horizontal rule
58

My wife's ex destroyed my car by sugaring my gas; someone I broke off with let herself into my room and threw everything of mine she could fit into a full hot bathtub with cocoa and tea. Dealing would have been so nice.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:09 PM
horizontal rule
59

Perhaps my friends are just more fractured already, since there's a lot of moving around, but for the breakups of longterm relationships there's often been very explicit lines drawn. Some people refuse to hear the name of the ex, ever, others try to micromanage friends' interactions with the ex, and in a few instances, the ex is ritually drummed out. There have been some more sane breakups, people dealing and getting over the relationship, but those tend to occur either with less serious couples or with marriages.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
60

you have to admit, the cocoa and tea was a nice touch.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
61

But shit like 58 is just wrong wrong wrong.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:12 PM
horizontal rule
62

58: Wow. Sugar in the gas tank is hard core.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
63

In college, I had a girlfriend physically attack me and another woman while we were in the shower (always get your key back immediately, kids). This was three weeks *after* the girlfriend had dumped me. Apparently I hadn't mourned long enough or something.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
64

59: Probably. I've noticed it with my own friends. It's a lot easier just not to talk to someone when chances are they're on the other side of the country now.

58: Damn.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:17 PM
horizontal rule
65

Gas-tank-sugarin' and such is insane, and I will never understand that. The last wedding I went to, the groom had as his best "man" the woman to whom he'd been engaged a few years before. She was sincerely thrilled for them and happy to be there in support of the wedding. People need to learn to cope.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
66

The same ex dumped hot coffee on her when she was with one of her friends, and mine attacked me by throwing stuff. I ducked easily but the rage scared me and I was shaken. These events did not occur in the same timeframe, nor did they arise out of the same transaction.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:20 PM
horizontal rule
67

I thought the Mythbusters had busted sugar in the tank?

Certainly most breakups don't come totally out of the blue, but that's not at all to say that they're mutual in any way relevent to the dumper/dumpee distinction.


Posted by: Unfoggetarian: "Pause endlessly, then go in." (9) | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
68

I ducked easily

I had to pick up the flailing ex-girlfriend, carry her down the stairs (no mean feat) and physically throw her out the front door, while I was dripping wet and naked. That was the last date with the new woman, who was roundly and understandably freaked out by the entire scene.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
69

Man. I can't think of when I've heard stories of this sort of thing happening to anyone I know in real life -- a certain amount of sadness or hostility, sure, but never violence or property damage.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:28 PM
horizontal rule
70

dripping wet and naked

Geez, apo, this is a family website. Are you trying to corrupt all of our minds?


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:28 PM
horizontal rule
71

this is a family website

The Manson Family, maybe.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:29 PM
horizontal rule
72

breaking up is hard to do


but it really depends on the relationship. Cala, you have mature friends. Some of my friends ex's from college, well, good god it was funny. actually, that includes me. drunk and jealous is not a good answer to any question.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
73

I once broke up with a guy who, in the course of the evening's conversation before I managed to break the news to him, told a story like IDP and apo's as though it had happened to a friend. A nice little story about "his friend" breaking into his mostly ex-girlfriend's apartment and cutting up all her clothes and her down comforter. Then, after I broke up with him, he talked on and on about how much he'd loved this woman, and I left feeling very glad that he had evidently not cared for me very much.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
74

I was also very glad never to see that chappie again.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:32 PM
horizontal rule
75

A good friend of mine's ex poisoned his cat when he dumped her. Poisoned his cat! And left it, dead, on his kitchen counter, with a note saying something to the effect of "now you'll be sorry to have left me." Sorry to have left he was not.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:33 PM
horizontal rule
76

71: 'Manson' s/b 'Addams'
do do do dit *snap snap*

Not all of my friends have handled all breakups maturely. This includes me, but I was nineteen. But we're all at the point where we can attend parties or the weddings of other friends without it ruining the night.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:34 PM
horizontal rule
77

"but that's not at all to say that they're mutual in any way relevent to the dumper/dumpee distinction."

Here we disagree.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
78

The moral in all of this may just be that one shouldn't date people who are insane.

Easier said than done, I suppose.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
79

I thought the Mythbusters had busted sugar in the tank?

Shortly after he must have done it, I drove the 300 miles home from Chicago, and by the time I arrived, it was running poorly. Then it wouldn't start. My dad, a physical chemist, helped me sleuth it. Little caramelized bits were all through the system, and I could never stop them from plugging the jets. I must have tried cleaning the tank and rebuilding the carburetor five-six times over the next few months.

Drew us together, maybe in mortification, all though we were pretty serious from the git-go. And since it was a Beetle, probably a good thing, as my wife's a Yekka.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
80

63: She must have decided that dumping was too good for you.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
81

but never violence or property damage

The college girlfriend was my only direct experience with it, but I've seen it plenty. One set of friends (McManlyPants, you probably know who I'm talking about) during one of their many separations, the woman came home to find her wedding dress in the bathtub, covered with urine and shit. For some sense of their history, nobody who knew them was much surprised by this.

Against everybody's advice, this couple is still married.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
82

wedding dress in the bathtub, covered with urine and shit

See, this is at least artistic. Not just reckless violence.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:38 PM
horizontal rule
83

Sugar in the gas tank is hard core.

Mythbusters claim this is bogus.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
84

mcmc! Able to judge the artistic quality of breakup violence, and maybe take a picture.

My two best friends and the resident head of the old Shoreland cleaned out the tub while I sat by in shock. He just kept saying "This is so inappropriate." My friend, also my Best Man and a great friend of my wife, will sometimes kid me about that even now.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:44 PM
horizontal rule
85

Much like a drug company's clinical trial that interprets "lowered LDL cholesterol for six months in healthy people" as "will reduce the risk heart attacks over the entire lifetime of non-healthy people", the weakness of the Mythbusters' results comes when they try to investigate something that takes a long time to happen as shown in 79.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
86

What's with the concept of chill breakups? If it's mature and calm and professional on both sides, there wasn't much passion or feeling there to begin with, n'est ce pas?

Not that I'm asking to have my gas tank sugared, mind you.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:46 PM
horizontal rule
87

It was slow-acting, as I described above, but it eventually made the car undriveable. And my dad demonstrated what it was with a battery of solvents and a flame test, and that same stuff kept blocking the jets until I gave up. Or shall we try it on your car?


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:47 PM
horizontal rule
88

I agree with 86 to an extent. I can't even imagine having an actual passionate relationship with somebody and then going back to having a casual friendship. All my exes have dropped completely out of my life as soon as we broke up. The breakups themselves were never full of anger, though. More like resignation to the inevitable.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:48 PM
horizontal rule
89

McManlyPants, you probably know who I'm talking about

I don't know the specific story, but I'll bet I could guess it in fewer than three.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:48 PM
horizontal rule
90

Or shall we try it on your car?

I ride a bike, IDP. But, I'm sorry. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Fortunately, the worst I've had to put up with is stalkery behavior.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:52 PM
horizontal rule
91

Ah, the fine often-invisible line between stalking_it's-not-really-stalking and stalking_totally-creepy.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 3:59 PM
horizontal rule
92

If it's mature and calm and professional on both sides, there wasn't much passion or feeling there to begin with, n'est ce pas?

I am a frigid cow, but it's just not the case that failure to destroy someone's property indicates a lack of passion earlier in the relationship.

In my experience, at least, it's either inevitable (it's either find a new group of friends, or deal), or just that my response to being scorned is pretty much to decide that someone isn't worth the time.

I mean, it doesn't go back to being sunshine and roses immediately, and there's been a fair amount of 'don't sit so and so next to so and so at the wedding' or 'are you okay with seeing X at the game?' or 'I'm not really talking to him these days', but with one exception, everyone I've dated seriously is now someone I could call and talk to with very little awkwardness.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:06 PM
horizontal rule
93

? If it's mature and calm and professional on both sides, there wasn't much passion or feeling there to begin with, n'est ce pas?

Maybe that means there relationships shouldn't be forced to bear the weight of expectations of Happily Ever After.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:09 PM
horizontal rule
94

If it's mature and calm and professional on both sides, there wasn't much passion or feeling there to begin with, n'est ce pas?

That seems pretty silly. Some people learn to control themselves.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:10 PM
horizontal rule
95

All my exes have dropped completely out of my life as soon as we broke up.

I'm still very good friends with my ex-wife—live in the same neighborhood and she sometimes comes to my current in-laws' for holidays, even—but having a kid together changes the math of that equation significantly. If we didn't have a child, I don't know whether we'd still be in touch or not. I like to think so, though.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:14 PM
horizontal rule
96

The boyfriend before the Biophysicist [hereinafter, B3] went around telling one of two stories after I broke up with him: a) that he'd discovered I was secretly a lesbian and was exploiting him [how was unclear, as I paid half the household expenses]; and b) that I was part of a secret sex cult and flew around the country having sex with hundreds of men [given that he'd seen me every day for several years, this was the more delusional].

Amusingly, B3 told a colleague that I was An Evil Dyke, causing her to call me, asking through gales of laughter just how long I'd been playing on her team. B3 didn't know that she wasn't het - after all, she had a daughter and wore make-up and dresses.

The worst thing he did was steal my SF signed first editions, some by Heinlein, which are today worth actual money. However, the universe took care of all of the above by killing him. I figure it was the book-stealing that really pissed off the Powers That Be, as my first husband tried the "she must be a lesbian routine" routine, as well. Why can't people accept that sometimes we leave them because of them, not because of some other person.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:19 PM
horizontal rule
97

Why can't people accept that sometimes we leave them because of them, not because of some other person.

The answer to that seems obvious.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:22 PM
horizontal rule
98

95: I was good friends with the Offspring's dad for quite a while - until Wife #2 came into the picture. She hates my son, even found a divorce attorney who tried to argue that the ex shouldn't have to pay child support because the Offspring is adopted. That started fireworks and a prolonged and expensive legal battle, and the ex and I have barely spoken civilly since. Absent Wife #2, I think we would have gone on being friends.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:28 PM
horizontal rule
99

97: It wasn't actually a question.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:29 PM
horizontal rule
100

went around telling one of two stories

My parents went through a pretty ugly split about the time I was graduating from high school that included my father telling people my mother had molested my brother and me. This was not the truth and the sheer nastiness of it shocked all of us, as it seemed so utterly out of character for him. A few months later he was diagnosed with an aggressively malignant brain tumor and all sorts of previously inexplicable things made a lot more sense.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:29 PM
horizontal rule
101

Plus, it's fun being friends with exes years after. Because then, when you're merrily tipsy at 2am, and someone asks your ex, who you're having a great time talking to, how you two know each other, and he blushes, you can purr, 'Oh, come on, tell him how you broke my heart' and order more margaritas.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:29 PM
horizontal rule
102

I have exes I'd like to be friends with, and I've even tried to find some online. My wife's most serious ex stays in touch with us, and we're on his holiday card list. But not everybody.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:35 PM
horizontal rule
103

101: For men, the downside to that situation is that you can't make jokes about how big your pecker is when there's someone to call you on it.


Posted by: ptm | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:44 PM
horizontal rule
104

Maybe you can't.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 4:45 PM
horizontal rule
105

Since the title of this post makes no sense, you should have just gone all out and called it "Gleaming the Qutb".


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:21 PM
horizontal rule
106

Can you hammer a six-inch spike through a board with your penis?


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:22 PM
horizontal rule
107

A girl's gotta have her standards.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:23 PM
horizontal rule
108

Internets high five, Becks.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:25 PM
horizontal rule
109

The title makes perfect sense, you bozo.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:26 PM
horizontal rule
110

That's one of my favoritest movies.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:27 PM
horizontal rule
111

110 to 108. Once again, Ogged ruins everything.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:27 PM
horizontal rule
112

Nope, 110 to 105. Sorry Becks.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:28 PM
horizontal rule
113

78 -- but then you would miss out on the hott insane-person sex.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
114

Okay, then one should not break up with people who are insane. Better to have them killed once the sex starts getting predictable.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:47 PM
horizontal rule
115

What's going on? 84 is posted by i don't pay but it concerns an experience of the Apostropher's.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:50 PM
horizontal rule
116

IDP's tub in 84 first appeared in comment 58.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
117

114: If comes down to them or your cat, okay.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:07 PM
horizontal rule
118

Idp went to Chicago?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:10 PM
horizontal rule
119

116 -- ah. So many defiled bathtubs! Hey btw, here's somebody else who went to Chicago.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:23 PM
horizontal rule
120

That's some chin Nic is sporting.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:26 PM
horizontal rule
121

Some people learn to control themselves.

Wasn't suggesting property damage was a requirement, just that calm, professional pretend-nothing-happened and then be-good-friends about it within the year seems weird to me.

Cala's interaction w/ exes is to be envied, I think...

Maybe that means there relationships shouldn't be forced to bear the weight of expectations of Happily Ever After.

A tough opinion to bring up when a-courtin'.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:27 PM
horizontal rule
122

Also, mental note: don't post comment then take hour-long Metro trip home.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:29 PM
horizontal rule
123

A tough opinion to bring up when a-courtin'.

Maybe. But it might seem worth the initial difficulty in Years 2, 7, and 20 (IIRC).


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:32 PM
horizontal rule
124

I am seriously wondering about y'all's taste in people to date. I've had bad breakups. But IME that means someone gets very sad and cries, and then maybe writes letters/calls/comes over a lot, awkwardness ensues, and eventually they realize they're no longer wanted and cry some more and go away.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
125

And (of course) shit on your wedding dress.


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:37 PM
horizontal rule
126

Actually, I had the damn thing cleaned and packed in a box after the wedding. Then, about half a dozen moves later, I finally just threw the fucking thing away.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:39 PM
horizontal rule
127

But what will PK wear when his wedding day comes?


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:47 PM
horizontal rule
128

124 seems right to me. I'm all about being hurt and angry and eternally scarred and shit, but this Fatal Attraction stuff is a bit weird.


Posted by: Idealist | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:48 PM
horizontal rule
129

127: He can wear my great-grandmother's wedding dress, which someone preserved and which, on account of antiquity and actual handmade lace, I am not going to toss. Although I do have to find where the movers packed it and put it in actual acid-free paper.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:51 PM
horizontal rule
130

Why must this thread devolve into horror stories? If Apo had been in Generation Awesome, his ex-girlfriend would have arrived at the shower to take part in the traditional Goodbye Threesome. I'm voting for the first Presidential candidate to campaign on a Logan's Run policy.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 6:52 PM
horizontal rule
131

How many Generation Awesome's do you know in real life, Rosebot?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:01 PM
horizontal rule
132

Hey, check out the optical illusion that makes it look like I put an apostrophe on "Awesome."


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:01 PM
horizontal rule
133

That's okay, it *is* your second language.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:03 PM
horizontal rule
134

Words.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:05 PM
horizontal rule
135

Why must you kill the dream, ogged? The GA'ers IRL that I know well-enough to know anything about their relationship/sex-lives are people I knew from a couple of local hangouts. Almost certainly not representative. I'm mostly inferring from the fake GA'ers I read on the Internets.

Is there something in your religion that prevents hoping for a brighter, better tomorrow, Shi'a? (And more seriously--don't you think that they seem more mellow about this stuff than we were/are?)


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:12 PM
horizontal rule
136

I dunno, the ones that hang out here seem particularly chill and cool, but there are a few blogs that I read by people in Generation Awesome that scream Avoid! Avoid! Maybe you, Timbot, just attract cool people, so you don't know about the crazies.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:16 PM
horizontal rule
137

Or maybe I close my eyes to unpleasant realities when the need arises. For the good of the blog--nay, for the good of the country--you should start dating some GA'ers and report on how awesome they really are. w-lfs-n doesn't count.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:29 PM
horizontal rule
138

re: mourning periods, etc.

I met a new partner, by sheer chance, a month or so after I broke up with someone I'd been with for a fairly long time (3 years or so). Unseemly haste? I don't know. Just depends how quickly the right person turns up. Fuck sack cloth and ashes.

And I certainly have mainted quite long friendships with exes with whom I've had fairly fractious and passionate/angry breakups, so it can certainly happen.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 7:50 PM
horizontal rule
139

My first girlfriend, the one I lost my virginity with, we had a huge breakup scene, but after that we were too proud to descend into real insanity, so we settled for not speaking to each other. Given that we saw each other twice a week for LARP, this was awkward, but after about three months, we got better. At New Year's this year, we found each other and caught up on our lives for an hour, discussing current SOs and recent exs, traded cat stories. She's the best ex ever.

My most recent ex prior to my current relationships I am very happy that we broke up, because we were terribly unsuited for each other beyond a mutual 'haven't gotten laid in forever and you're cute' reaction. After three months of awkward attempts to build the relationship into something other than purely sexual, we broke up and both of us promptly found new people to date that were massively better for us. I'm very happy with the girl I met and she seems deliriously happy with her new boytoy.


Posted by: Nbarnes | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
140

Someone needs to make a joke about virginity and LARPing. I just don't have the chops to construct it.


Posted by: NathanL | Link to this comment | 01- 9-07 9:27 PM
horizontal rule
141

I'm sure that Unfogged has someone that can rise to the occasion.

I'm strong enough to take the hit. After all, I did lose my virginity to a tall, pale, skinny goth girl who taught me how to put on eyeliner.


Posted by: Nbarnes | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 12:46 AM
horizontal rule
142

I doubt I'm in "Generation Awesome," but I did promise my boyfriend that if I were the one to break up with him, I'd find a girl for a threesome. That way, when I left for the last time, there'd still be someone else there. However, if he'd broken up with me and suggested a threesome, I'm not sure I would have been mature enough to avoid the types of behaviors described above.

"If it's mature and calm and professional on both sides, there wasn't much passion or feeling there to begin with, n'est ce pas?"

I had tremendous passion and feeling with my first serious boyfriend -- it just wore down over time due to the reason I never should have dated him in the first place. Because of the passion and feeling, I didn't have the sense not to date him in the first place, or break up with him at times when the reason became especially obvious. Eventually the wear and tear on my heart and soul was too much, and then we broke up. Now I just regard him as a man who is good but weak, and it's easy to be a distant kind of friends with someone like that. I'm sorry, though, because he was my best friend once and it's hard to think less of someone whom you used to respect more. Also all future boyfriends have on the one hand the automatic advantage of not having that reason against them, but the disadvantage of not trying to make up for it by being adoring. Did I mention my vanity along with the passion and feeling?


Posted by: PG | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 10:29 PM
horizontal rule
143

Sounds like you're a member of Generation Awesome to me, PG.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 10:52 PM
horizontal rule
144

Cockblock!


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 10:56 PM
horizontal rule
145

Gevalt.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:02 PM
horizontal rule
146

Does 144 imply that Standpipe has a cock? Does one need a cock to cockblock, or is it simply that one is blocking another's cock? In the event that one needs a cock for the purposes of cockblocking but doesn't have a cock, is it safe to assume that BPh.D.'s freezer houses an ample supply?


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:08 PM
horizontal rule
147

No one expects the Standpipish Interposition.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:08 PM
horizontal rule
148

The cock is the universal signifier. Everone has access to the cock.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:10 PM
horizontal rule
149

is it safe to assume that BPh.D.'s freezer houses an ample supply?

Oh yeah, baby.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:11 PM
horizontal rule
150

Shorter 148: DerriDUH!


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:16 PM
horizontal rule
151

Does one need a cock to cockblock, or is it simply that one is blocking another's cock?

No and yes. I mean, think about it; why would one need a cock to block a cock? Women cockblock all the time.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:27 PM
horizontal rule
152

Women cockblock all the time.

Hmf. The much-revered Urban Dictionary agrees. I think people around these parts tend to use it when referring specifically to the actions of men. Interesting.

I do like the more-flexible definition.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:40 PM
horizontal rule
153

I think people around these parts tend to use it when referring specifically to the actions of men.

Would those be the people around those parts who habitually wear pink polo shirts with upturned collars? Because if so, well...


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:50 PM
horizontal rule
154

153: Exactly. The local ruling class. Damn them and their oppressive cocks.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-10-07 11:54 PM
horizontal rule
155

148: It's what?


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:13 AM
horizontal rule
156

Remedial Theory.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:18 AM
horizontal rule
157

Dude, I know the theory. I'm saying, I have a problem with it.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:19 AM
horizontal rule
158

Dude, good for you. I do, too. One of the miracles of language is that I can write things I don't mean literally.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:29 AM
horizontal rule
159

Yes, I figured.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:31 AM
horizontal rule
160

The point of 148 was?


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:31 AM
horizontal rule
161

The point of 155.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:31 AM
horizontal rule
162

Also, come on, "Lacan holds the phallus". I gave you fruit, B. Fruit.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:34 AM
horizontal rule
163

160: A fake rhetorical question. Think raised eyebrow and arch voice. I'm a mom: "what did you say?" is a stock phrase.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:47 AM
horizontal rule
164

162: No, the fruit is behind the phallus.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:48 AM
horizontal rule
165

"is" s/b "hangs," of course.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:49 AM
horizontal rule
166

A fake rhetorical question.

Honestly. It's too late for double meta reverse irony.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 12:55 AM
horizontal rule
167

I'm a mom

You're a bitch, you're a lover, you're a child, you're a mother.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 1:04 AM
horizontal rule
168

Dude.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 1:05 AM
horizontal rule
169

if he'd broken up with me and suggested a threesome, I'm not sure I would have been mature enough to avoid the types of behaviors described above

But wouldn't the appropriate thing be, if he broke up with you, for him to find a guy for a threesome? So there'd still be somebody?


Posted by: Clownaesthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01-11-07 5:09 AM
horizontal rule