Re: 디지털 권리 관리

1

I wonder how they have it set up with US record companies?


Posted by: 丑麻醉學者 | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 9:36 PM
horizontal rule
2

Nice title.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 9:40 PM
horizontal rule
3

iTunes, to the best of my understanding, was never about making money by selling music. It was, and is, a vehicle for selling iPods. Newsweek had an article a couple years ago about Apple's profits, and they were more than willing to accept very little profit on the songs in order to build the iPod brand (they're cute! we have a great catalog! don't steal music! did we mention our iPods are cute?)


Posted by: カら | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 9:45 PM
horizontal rule
4

Digital what?


Posted by: Junior Mint | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 9:48 PM
horizontal rule
5

Dunno; that's all I could make of it either. I assume it's something relevant.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 9:50 PM
horizontal rule
6

Google suggests it probably means something like "digital rights management". Sorry about the sloppy research; I am about to go to bed. Goodnight!


Posted by: Clownaesthesiologist | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 9:53 PM
horizontal rule
7

That's what I was thinking.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 9:54 PM
horizontal rule
8

Don't forgot bleep, which not only has DRM free music, but often has it in FLAC (true cd quality) or at least very high quality MP3. Plus, you can preview entire songs on bleep.

Of course, you have to like music from Warp Records or one of the other labels they're partnered with for bleep to be of service to you.


Posted by: Andrew | Link to this comment | 01-15-07 10:33 PM
horizontal rule