Re: Lucky Day!

1

What was he before?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:16 PM
horizontal rule
2

Legion.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:18 PM
horizontal rule
3

The date "February 4, 1998" is cropped out of the photo.


Posted by: mike d | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:18 PM
horizontal rule
4

My crack investigative journalism (e.g., asking him) revealed that he had only updated his status from "none" to "single", not switched his status from "in a relationship" to "single", which is usually what is required to warrant the broken heart. But I couldn't resist! I had to pimp him out to the ladies! That broken heart was just so tragic!


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:19 PM
horizontal rule
5

That "none" category would appeal to Emerson, I'm thinking.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
6

from "none" to "single"

Known in the blues vernacular as "been down so long that it looks like up to me."


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
7

What is that from? I'm old.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
8

Facebook.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:26 PM
horizontal rule
9

A moment before I read this, I saw Ficke recording smasher's facebook gag. This is indeed a grim vision of the inter-future. Nothing but screenshots of facebook, as far as the browser can scroll...


Posted by: tom | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:27 PM
horizontal rule
10

I lose another follower. That's OK, Ben, there's no reason for you to think about my feelings. No one else does.

Personally, in the world of today, I don't think that anyone should use phrases like "crack X" in the sense of of "expert X". There are just too many pitfalls.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:36 PM
horizontal rule
11

Whoa, freaky. It's a brave new world.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:37 PM
horizontal rule
12

9: Smasher is another of those guys who should getting love all day, every day. Because that's funny.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 8:37 PM
horizontal rule
13

Does facebook allow silhouettes?


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:02 PM
horizontal rule
14

It's a brave new world.

You don't say.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:04 PM
horizontal rule
15

Does Facebook require real names?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:20 PM
horizontal rule
16

Now how would they do that?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:22 PM
horizontal rule
17

Yes.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:22 PM
horizontal rule
18

Duel.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:23 PM
horizontal rule
19

Sort of. They say you're supposed to use a real name, but they'll only turn you down (they review all user names) if it looks obviously fake.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:23 PM
horizontal rule
20

Obviously if you sign up with a fake name that looks like a real name they're not going to figure it out, but if you create a profile that's clearly fake they'll kick you off. There used to be a lot of these, and some of them were really funny, but then they got wise to it and laid the smackdown.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:24 PM
horizontal rule
21

Semi-Ficke-pwned.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:25 PM
horizontal rule
22

I'd have thought they'd have learned their lesson from Friendster. Fakesters were the only good reason to be on Friendster in the first place.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:29 PM
horizontal rule
23

What about a real name, but not your real name?


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:29 PM
horizontal rule
24

Or a real face but not, etc.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:29 PM
horizontal rule
25

If they can't tell, they're not going to do anything.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:30 PM
horizontal rule
26

The link in 14 is bringing out the latent libertarian in me. Is this not Exhibit A for why lawyers have a bad reputation? Thank goodness the commenters injected a little sanity into the discussion.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:34 PM
horizontal rule
27

Lazy.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:34 PM
horizontal rule
28

27 to 25.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:35 PM
horizontal rule
29

I'd have thought they'd have learned their lesson from Friendster.

They exist to sell your information to marketers. Fake profiles devalue their product.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:37 PM
horizontal rule
30

Nothing but screenshots of facebook, as far as the browser can scroll

The mise en abyme: I'm happy to have helped to usher it to fruition.

Timbot, we should be MySpace buddies.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:41 PM
horizontal rule
31

Facebook sells information to marketers? Man, am I naive.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:42 PM
horizontal rule
32

Not that I'm on Facebook, or likely ever will be, but still.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:43 PM
horizontal rule
33

Ha, Becks. I saw the same thing and thought about posting it.

Armsmasher's feed has been hilarious. I didn't know the proper place to say so, but here is as good as any.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 9:46 PM
horizontal rule
34

They exist to sell your information to marketers.

Yeah, but if they don't have any users, they don't have any information to sell.

Then again, I don't think anybody ever talked about buying Friendster for $1 billion, so there you go.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:00 PM
horizontal rule
35

"None" isn't, as far as I can tell, a category one can select; I had just never selected anything at all before.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:07 PM
horizontal rule
36

w-lfs-n is a débutant!


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:11 PM
horizontal rule
37

Now that he's come out, as it were, we should throw him a sweet sixteen.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:14 PM
horizontal rule
38

"attained his majority"


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:22 PM
horizontal rule
39

But could he qualify for DAR?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:24 PM
horizontal rule
40

Probably not.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:29 PM
horizontal rule
41

Does DAR even allow Jews in?


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:29 PM
horizontal rule
42

No, nor men. I'm sure Ben is hurt that his Jewishness is more obvious to you than his Y chromosome.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:31 PM
horizontal rule
43

Obviously if you sign up with a fake name that looks like a real name they're not going to figure it out, but if you create a profile that's clearly fake they'll kick you off. There used to be a lot of these, and some of them were really funny, but then they got wise to it and laid the smackdown.

You know, you're right. I was friends with Saparmurat Aliyevich Niyazov Turkmenbashi (his network was "Dartmouth Staff") for several months, and now I look and his profile has disappeared.

What if it happens to me?!?!?!? Who are they to say who exists and who does not?!?!?!?


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:33 PM
horizontal rule
44

Do you know that my grandmother, until recently, held the title of national security czar for DAR? While I was in college, she cooked up a scheme to have the UN evicted from the United States, figuring that most nations had not paid some category of taxes on their place in the UN building (not realizing that the whole thing was a gift from Rockefeller, right?). So all the time she was asking me to gather for her blueprints of the UN building, which I knew even back then to be a slightly sketchy request.

This is the same grandmother who served as executive director of the Alamo, and escorted Ozzy off the premises. She also instilled in me the belief—one that persisted until college—that, from his deathbed, Davy Crockett threw a knife that pierced two of Santana's Mexicans. (It's fully clear to me now that he only got one.)


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:35 PM
horizontal rule
45

42: Well, he's on the thin side. If he'd shave, he might be able to pull off drag.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:35 PM
horizontal rule
46

DAR Czar?


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:36 PM
horizontal rule
47

I'm sure Ben is hurt that his Jewishness is more obvious to you than his Y chromosome.

That's lovely. Because it's true.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:37 PM
horizontal rule
48

Yeah.

I'm a Son of the Republic of Texas, Son of the Confederacy, and Son of the American Revolution.

Also, Becks style.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:37 PM
horizontal rule
49

Wait a minute. I have established through nerdly conversations here and with genealogist-nut CharleyCarp that I could join the DAR and demand a coming-out ball. Or could have, or whatever. Surely if I married a JewyMcFinkelstein, my daughter would have the exact same claim to DAR status as if I married, say, a second-generation English immigrant?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:38 PM
horizontal rule
50

44 is awesome. There's a family legend that I still maybe kinda sorta believe a little bit that we had a relative who was a friend of Pat Garrett, and that the very old pistol in the top drawer of the guest room dresser was Billy the Kid's "spare" gun.

Also, my dad once told me I should join the DAR (apparently I'm supposedly eligible or something). I *think* he was joking.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:38 PM
horizontal rule
51

There ought to be a Sons of the American Revolution, because then they would be SARS.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:39 PM
horizontal rule
52

Me too! W00T becks-style!


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:39 PM
horizontal rule
53

44.---Whoa.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:39 PM
horizontal rule
54

49: Does the DAR recognize maternal descent?


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:39 PM
horizontal rule
55

54.---If they don't, I don't qualify.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:40 PM
horizontal rule
56

They just seem like the kind of organization that might not.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:43 PM
horizontal rule
57

that the very old pistol in the top drawer of the guest room dresser was Billy the Kid's "spare" gun.

Don't let just anyone get that pistol when your parents die. Even if you're not inclined to keep it, it might be worth quite a bit of money.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:49 PM
horizontal rule
58

57: Mr. B. gave it to my asshole uncle in Oklahoma because he was not going to try to get even an antique gun across the border. Plus it seemed like the right thing to do.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:51 PM
horizontal rule
59

57: Mr. B. gave it to my asshole

This is a family blog, B.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:54 PM
horizontal rule
60

Asshole modifies uncle, Ben.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:55 PM
horizontal rule
61

Racist!


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:56 PM
horizontal rule
62

I think that counts as incest.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:56 PM
horizontal rule
63

62: I wouldn't think so. Mr. B is no relation to B's uncle.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:57 PM
horizontal rule
64

I was reading 60 as a standalone with elided "my".


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:58 PM
horizontal rule
65

63: Notice that *this* time there was an all-important comma.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 10:59 PM
horizontal rule
66

Does "modify" count as a legally actionable verb w/r/t incest?


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:04 PM
horizontal rule
67

All tools serve to modify something.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:05 PM
horizontal rule
68

(For instance, a ruler modifies our knowledge of something's length.)


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:07 PM
horizontal rule
69

Speaking of tools, seriously, there should be a guide for Nerve profiles. These are fucking pathetic.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:07 PM
horizontal rule
70

68 is kind of pathetic.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:14 PM
horizontal rule
71

Someone should redact 70. I meant to say,

68 is a bit of a stretch.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:15 PM
horizontal rule
72

He's single! Punches must be pulled w/r/t length!


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:15 PM
horizontal rule
73

49 -- "nut"?

Eligibility for the DAR is not based on any particular line. (It's thus not like the Cincinnati). You can be a member based on any ancestor, and, no matter who you marry, your children can join the CAR -- and either DAR or SAR, as the case may be, when their old enough.

I can't imagine there being any religious test for membership, but then it might be in the bylaws. IIRC, in the 90's, the GSMD dropped its requirement that applicants certify not having called for the violent overthrow of the US government.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:16 PM
horizontal rule
74

when they're old enough, anyway


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:17 PM
horizontal rule
75

67 and 68 were extremely lame allusions to the philosophical investigations.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:19 PM
horizontal rule
76

"nut" s/b "enthusiast"


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 04- 3-07 11:20 PM
horizontal rule
77

Why Ben can't join the DAR [and it's not because he's Jewish:

Any woman is eligible for membership who is no less than eighteen years of age and can prove lineal, blood line, descent from an ancestor who aided in achieving American independence. She must provide documentation for each statement of birth, marriage and death.

Admission to membership in the NSDAR is either by invitation through a Chapter in your State Organization (or Unit Overseas) or as a Member-At-Large. No Chapter may discriminate against an applicant on the basis of race or creed.

Acceptable Service for Ancestor:

NOTE: The National Society reserves the right to determine the acceptability of all service and proof thereof. The National Society accepts service, with some exceptions, for the period between 19 April 1775 (Battle of Lexington) and 26 November 1783 (withdrawal of British Troops from New York), as follows:

Signers of the Declaration of Independence

Military Service: (participation in) Army and Navy of the Continental Establishment, State Navy, State and Local Militia, Privateers, and Military or Naval Service performed by French nationals in the American theater of war.

Civil Service: (holding office under authority of the Provisional or new State Governments) State, County and Town Officials (Town Clerk, Selectman, Juror, Town Treasurer, Judge, Sheriff, Constable, Jailer, Surveyor of Highways, Justice of the Peace)

Patriotic Service: (to include) Members of the Continental Congress, State Conventions and Assemblies Membership in committees made necessary by the War, including service on committees which furthered the cause of the Colonies from April 1774, Committees of Correspondence, Inspection and Safety, committees to care for soldier's families, etc.

Signer of Oath of Fidelity and Support, Oath of Allegiance

Members of the Boston Tea Party

Defenders of Forts and Frontiers, and Signers of petitions addressed to and recognizing the authority of the Provisional and new State Governments

Doctors and nurses and others rendering aid to the wounded (other than their immediate families)

Ministers who gave patriotic sermons and encouraged patriotic activity

Furnishing a substitute for military service

Prisoners of war or refugees from occupying forces

Prisoners on the British ship Old Jersey, or other prison ships

Service in the Spanish Troops under Galvez or the Louisiana Militia after 24 December 1776

Those who rendered material aid, such as furnishing supplies with or without remuneration, lending money to the Colonies, munitions makers, gunsmiths, etc.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 5:53 AM
horizontal rule
78

This is one of the lousiest overnight threads I've seen yet. You all fail, especially Becks.


Posted by: Nbarnes | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 6:49 AM
horizontal rule
79

to 78: ?????


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 7:49 AM
horizontal rule
80

My nieces' applications for the DAR would be impacted by some circumstantial evidence that our American Revolutionary ancestor was a deserter. Apparently that line of the family spent part of a generation in Quebec after the war.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 8:26 AM
horizontal rule
81

She also instilled in me the belief--one that persisted until college--that, from his deathbed, Davy Crockett threw a knife that pierced two of Santana's Mexicans.

Which ones?


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
82

Getting a look at Ben's facebook profile, I found that he was the man of my dreams. Until I saw Sunn O))). Why do you tease me so, w-lfs-n?

And how many people are actually in those American Revolution clubs? Seems like a lot of people should be able to prove some ancestry, it's only a question of why you would bother.


Posted by: JAC | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 9:34 AM
horizontal rule
83

BTW, Santana is the cheesy musician, no? Santa Ana was the villainous moustache-twisting Mexican general.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
84

I can change, JAC.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 10:27 AM
horizontal rule
85

Why has this thread not resulted in teh hot sex for Ben?


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
86

Who said it hasn't? Look, just walking around with w-lfs-n is tantamount to teh hot sex with any other man. Knowing that he is out there walking around by himself is practically foreplay.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
87

I can say it hasn't.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
88

85: Because of drone metal. Duh.


Posted by: JAC | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
89

79: Insufficently interesting / lurid / titillating / intellectually stimulating. Something better needs to be put up around 10 - 12 PST, or the commenter needs to put forth more of an effort to entertain me. When I'm feeling like doing a bit of self-harm and staying up until 7 am, I need something... more to distract myself.


Posted by: nbarn | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 7:53 PM
horizontal rule
90

85: Because we really are all just words on a screen.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 04- 4-07 11:05 PM
horizontal rule
91

90: On the internet, nobody knows you're a simplistic phrase aggregator.


Posted by: Nbarnes | Link to this comment | 04- 5-07 6:24 AM
horizontal rule
92

85: 'Cause anyone capable of hot sex is headed to Louisiana with their cameras.


Posted by: Biohazard | Link to this comment | 04- 5-07 7:10 AM
horizontal rule