Re: We

1

It's simple. They asked what you were like, Brad said he was somewhat afraid to meet you, and I told them both that in fact you are rather quiet and extremely polite, and that any shit-giving that happens is extremely subtle and easy to overlook if you're not paying attention, or not inclined to pick up on it.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:24 PM
horizontal rule
2

You can, of course, redact that comment if it ruins your rep.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:24 PM
horizontal rule
3

Way to kill the comment thread, champ.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:25 PM
horizontal rule
4

Wasn't the answer obvious?


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:26 PM
horizontal rule
5

Why does bitchphd hate imagination?


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:29 PM
horizontal rule
6

Aw, man! What I wanted to be true instead is that Ogged actually was there and is now doing what he can to hoard together the last remaining shreds of his dignity. I like how Brad calls your persona "pure unshackled id."


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:30 PM
horizontal rule
7

I *told* him he could redact the fucking comment. If you want to pretend, get mad at him, not me.

Anyway, I didn't mention that other thing.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:32 PM
horizontal rule
8

6: Brad's a total plagiarist; I believe the "id" comment was my own.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:35 PM
horizontal rule
9

Who would have thought the id devoted quite so much time to streamlining TPS reports?


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:41 PM
horizontal rule
10

That's the superego doing that.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:44 PM
horizontal rule
11

Ben may have taken the night off, so I just wanted to point out that it should be "whom The Ogged has never met." The Ogged cuts better if he stays sharp.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:50 PM
horizontal rule
12

Really? I had "whom" and changed it. Are you, like, sure sure?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:52 PM
horizontal rule
13

This is one of the perils of grammar by ear, rather than grammar by rules.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:54 PM
horizontal rule
14

"the Ogged hasn't met [object of clause]"
and thus
"whom the ogged hasn't met"


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:55 PM
horizontal rule
15

Standpipe speaks the truth.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:57 PM
horizontal rule
16

Fixed.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:58 PM
horizontal rule
17

Or writes it, actually. For all I know, s/he's a big fat liar in person.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 10:58 PM
horizontal rule
18

17: Standpipe, if I asked the Bridgeplate next to you if you were telling me the truth, what would it say?


Posted by: Beefo Meaty | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 11:01 PM
horizontal rule
19

Use-mention error, Tweety, and besides that, words don't talk.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 11:03 PM
horizontal rule
20

Stop oppressing us, Bridgeplate.


Posted by: "capacious" | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 11:07 PM
horizontal rule
21

No kidding.


Posted by: "kidding" | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 11:09 PM
horizontal rule
22

You all are idiots. You're typing silly comments when you could be eating halfway-decent mexican food. Or sushi-. Or Ethiopian food. You live in an earthly paradise and you bitch amongst yourselves, Are you trying to invite nemesis?


Posted by: foolishmortal | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 11:34 PM
horizontal rule
23

I really like ogged, and all the rest of you are mean, mean jerks.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 11:52 PM
horizontal rule
24

Or Ethiopian food

When the eating is done, Unfogged is the injera with which one sops up the spicy ye beg tibs of human interaction on teh Internets -- or something like that. Fortunately, the analogy is so poor that it evades the ban.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 05-24-07 11:52 PM
horizontal rule
25

Pomegranate beer: delicious.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:02 AM
horizontal rule
26

Cheap shiraz and Palindromes: weird.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:05 AM
horizontal rule
27

I find myself wondering if D-503 will comment on this thread.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:06 AM
horizontal rule
28

Some of us are watching Švankmajer's Alice.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:15 AM
horizontal rule
29

His Faust is good, too.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:18 AM
horizontal rule
30

I loved his take on Grease 2.


Posted by: Beefo Meaty | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:21 AM
horizontal rule
31

re: 30

Heh.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:25 AM
horizontal rule
32

I liked Otasanek best.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:27 AM
horizontal rule
33

Ogged's online persona is wry, witty, and self-aware id, not pure unshackled id. That's where the funny comes from.


Posted by: marcus | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:52 AM
horizontal rule
34

I watched Little Murders tonight; unlike some people's films of choice it didn't have a drink pairing.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:56 AM
horizontal rule
35

Same movie; PBR.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:59 AM
horizontal rule
36

Oh, and we made nachos. NACHOS, people.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:01 AM
horizontal rule
37

What about them?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:01 AM
horizontal rule
38

What about the nachos?


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:03 AM
horizontal rule
39

Who will think of the nachos?!


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:07 AM
horizontal rule
40

You, apparently.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:08 AM
horizontal rule
41

Mm, nachos...


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:10 AM
horizontal rule
42

I should go to bed. My parents are coming tomorrow, and I've got to clean up and stuff before they get here.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:14 AM
horizontal rule
43

Good night nacho teo!


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:16 AM
horizontal rule
44

Buenos nachos, Stanley.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:18 AM
horizontal rule
45

and I've got to clean up and stuff before they get here.

"clean up and stuff" s/b "hide the porn and weed"


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:47 AM
horizontal rule
46

I like how Brad calls your persona "pure unshackled id."

There's an "iot" missing there I think. And a "fucking", too, probably.


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 2:01 AM
horizontal rule
47

Brad said he was somewhat afraid to meet you, and I told them both that in fact you are rather quiet and extremely polite.

Like Peter Lorre, for example, or various other sinister Levantine types. Some stereotypes are accurate.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 5:36 AM
horizontal rule
48

24 -- "analogy" s/b "metaphor".


Posted by: Clownaesthesiologist | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 5:48 AM
horizontal rule
49

(Poor either way but.)


Posted by: Clownaesthesiologist | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 5:49 AM
horizontal rule
50

I have the feeling that actually meeting you people* would ruin the Unfogged experience.


*Grammar police: Yes, I realize it should be "yous guys."


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 5:50 AM
horizontal rule
51

So I remain the only Unfogged blogger ever actually impersonated by a reader? Not that that means anything, I just thought I'd point it out.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 5:50 AM
horizontal rule
52

A fake Lizardbreath? Did Buck believe your claim that it wasnt your myspace account, but a fakers?


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 5:55 AM
horizontal rule
53

24: I feel that the analogy ban should be enforced more strongly against poor analogies, not less. Of course, I say this having been accused by The Pure Unshackled Id himself of 'making a mockery of the analogy ban', so I wouldn't necessarily take my own advice on this one.


Posted by: Nbarnes | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 6:51 AM
horizontal rule
54

53: Do you feel that the analogy ban should be enforced more or less stringently against metaphors than against analogies?


Posted by: Clownaesthesiologist | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 6:53 AM
horizontal rule
55

The analogy ban is like the Seventh Commandment. Everyone things other people should obey it. And most people obey it most of the time -- just not when there's a good opportunity to break it.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:11 AM
horizontal rule
56

"Thinks". I lapsed into Swedish.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:14 AM
horizontal rule
57

Okej.


Posted by: Clownaesthesiologist | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:15 AM
horizontal rule
58

Nearly 60 posts in, and nobody has done the obvious joke yet? The Unfogged cultural norm that bans impersonation must be strong indeed.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:30 AM
horizontal rule
59

It's pretty deeply ingrained.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:40 AM
horizontal rule
60

Or, alternatively, the sophisticates here disdained the obvious joke, and left the low-hanging fruit to the less imaginative.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
61

> look sophisticates

I see no sophisticates here.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:48 AM
horizontal rule
62

Has there been an update from that guy from that blog about the events from that post since like a week after the events?


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:54 AM
horizontal rule
63

Well, if he's appearing on panels, then we know he hasn't been murdered. I don't know any more than that, but that's good news in itself.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:57 AM
horizontal rule
64

Of course, we don't really know that's *him* appearing on the panels.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 8:02 AM
horizontal rule
65

It may be that someone is impersonating that guy in order to throw the police off the scent.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 8:02 AM
horizontal rule
66

The real that guy may be found in one of [his town]'s many abandoned buildings one of these days. Cadavers are no big deal down there, they've learned to take them in stride. The hung-loose, joyful [his town] spirit, so unlike the uptight Puritan spirit of the rest of the US.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 8:05 AM
horizontal rule
67

Cadavers are no big deal down there, they've learned to take them in stride.

That's right. Hence the adage: "If you come to a corpse in the road, take it."


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
68

1: We could've had such fun! Alas, B. sums it up. Apparently you're quite polite and charming, "The Ogged." (I may be misremembering, but I thought that's what Brad said, which is why I repeated the odd locution.) It would've been much cooler had someone revealed him/herself to have been ogged. (What with me so expert at having wool pulled over my eyes.)

62: There could be an update, but it'd be boring, as that guy's been completely cut out from that particular social circle. His friend decided to stay with her husband -- you know, "for the children" -- and now she's his former friend.

64: Eventually, we'll have visual confirmation that it's me. (And Brad, and B.)


Posted by: SEK | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
69

His friend decided to stay with her husband -- you know, "for the children" -- and now she's his former friend.

That really sucks. My sympathy to that guy and his former friend both.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
70

His friend decided to stay with her husband

Wow.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 10:53 AM
horizontal rule
71

Generally, I'm all for marriages staying together despite rough patches, but in this case, ick. Sorry about the social circle.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 10:54 AM
horizontal rule
72

Wow.
Wow.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
73

my faith in the world just slipped a notch.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
74

Wow. I hope that guy is doing OK.


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
75

there are many notches in my thing on which my faith in things hangs.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:05 AM
horizontal rule
76

I'll bet her children aren't grateful when they grow up.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:10 AM
horizontal rule
77

I wonder if they're even grateful now.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:12 AM
horizontal rule
78

62. That guy did the right thing, at great personal cost, with the foreknowledge that it would cost him dearly. That is called being a hero in my book.


Posted by: Tassled Loafered Leech | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:16 AM
horizontal rule
79

I'd be surprised if you don't hear from her again.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:19 AM
horizontal rule
80

What the Leech said.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
81

70 and 78 get it exactly right.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:37 AM
horizontal rule
82

78 gets it right.

Unfortunately, I'm not especially surprised at the outcome (shitty though it is).


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
83

No shame in thinking better of your friends than they prove to be, at least the first time.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
84

I'm not especially surprised at the outcome

Really?

I'd hope at least that that guy's friend thanked him somewhere along the way for disabusing her of any wayward notions she had about her husband. In any case, I'd not want to be even a fly on the wall in their household for the next, oh, 10 years or so.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:15 PM
horizontal rule
85

The guy sounds like my brother-in-law. He could clean up his act for awhile and he was a great sweet-talker, but he never really changed for the better.

The odds are that anything the husband has promised the wife will be a dead letter within a year.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
86

81 gets it exactly right.


Posted by: DaveL | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:23 PM
horizontal rule
87

Heroes make me cry.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:24 PM
horizontal rule
88

there are many notches in my thing on which my faith in things hangs.

ATM.


Posted by: sam k | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:37 PM
horizontal rule
89

86 gets it exactly right. Fucking unfathomable. Poor kids.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
90

Thanks all. I'm with those who believe that eventually that guy won't be a pariah, but right now it seems like he's the proxy blame in this one; after all, he is the person who let the cat out of the bag.

As for the kids, as one of the few people there who still talks to that guy said: "It's better to grow up rich and powerful than poor and black-balled." But emotionally?


Posted by: SEK | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
91

Great, maybe those kids will run for office someday, and we'll wonder why the hell they're doing X.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
92

At least we'll be able to pinpoint the day their souls died?

Wait, none of this is very consoling.


Posted by: SEK | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
93

Eh, my kid goes to school with a bunch of very overprivileged kids. (Actually they're all overprivileged just by virtue of being there.) He's just finishing fourth grade, and with a handful of exceptions the rich kids are already showing signs of being fucked for life. Given the choice between an even halfway healthy family and a rich one, go for healthy every time.


Posted by: DaveL | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 12:59 PM
horizontal rule
94

93 get's it exactly right.


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:04 PM
horizontal rule
95

At least we'll be able to pinpoint the day their souls died?

Which day is that?

Sweetheart, that guy did the right thing. People lying in a very deep manner to one another is the soul-killer. It must be outed.

er. Trust. No?


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:15 PM
horizontal rule
96

Yeah, the staying for the sake of the kids things has its limits, and one of 'em should be "daddy's a complete and utter asshole."


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:22 PM
horizontal rule
97

The guy's friend ought to thank him, now or in the future, but if she's taken her rotten bastard of a husband back, I wonder if that will ever happen. If she does leave her husband, I can't imagine she'll be eager to admit the guy did her a favor.


Posted by: Magpie | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 1:23 PM
horizontal rule
98

It sucks, but That Guy told the truth and the truth is always worth telling.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
99

When we have the mythical LA meetup, I promise to buy that guy the libation of his choice. Hell, I might even drive down there and retrieve him for the event.


Posted by: Tassled Loafered Leech | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
100

Mythical, eh? I'm in. Just so long as I don't have to use a car to get ther-oh, LA.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 3:39 PM
horizontal rule
101

I would come to this LA meetup, were it in Texas. Can someone work on that?


Posted by: pdf23ds | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 3:50 PM
horizontal rule
102

I'd be up for an unmythical LA meetup, as well as anything else that'll score me free booze.


Posted by: SEK | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 3:55 PM
horizontal rule
103

I can think of nothing better than to have the LA meetup in Texas. Houston or San Antonio? I know, El Paso!


Posted by: Tassled Loafered Leech | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 3:56 PM
horizontal rule
104

Scew that, have it in Flower Mound, TX.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 3:58 PM
horizontal rule
105

I think we're due for a houston one, no?


Posted by: soubzriquet | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 4:00 PM
horizontal rule
106

We could totally have the LA meetup within walking distance of the Red Line. I vote for The Well at Sunset and Vine. It is not too convenient to Houston though.


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 4:03 PM
horizontal rule
107

Let's let the TX folks work out there own issues. Hollywood works for me, but I am less familiar with the territory than I used to be.


Posted by: Tassled Loafered Leech | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 4:13 PM
horizontal rule
108

True LA meetup requires it be not in LA, right? It has to be in, say, Reseda. Everyone has to drive at least 30 minutes.

Gold or Red lines are good.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 4:17 PM
horizontal rule
109

Also, no admittance if you are distaff and don't have fake boobs. That's just not how we do things here.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 4:20 PM
horizontal rule
110

Given our atomized, isolated existences, there's no way we'll ever meetup unless we crash our cars into one another.


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 4:42 PM
horizontal rule
111

True LA meetup requires it be not in LA, right? It has to be in, say, Reseda.

Taking a cue from the Angels? You could bill it as "the Los Angeles meetup of Sherman Oaks".


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 6:58 PM
horizontal rule
112

Any LA meetup should be at Taix on Sunset.

Is it convenient? Who cares.


Posted by: Beefo Meaty | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 6:59 PM
horizontal rule
113

I vote for West Hollywood ... you know, so we can get dosed and really have some fun.


Posted by: SEK | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:36 PM
horizontal rule
114

SEK offered to take me to a gay bar in West Hollywood. I mistrust his intentions.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:43 PM
horizontal rule
115

It's for your own good. I mean, you're nearly 26 and you've yet to score. You'd be the only straight guy there. No competition! You'll win!*

*By default.


Posted by: SEK | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:51 PM
horizontal rule
116

115 *By default s/b "Ground rule double"


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:54 PM
horizontal rule
117

Honestly, I'd be interested in an LA meetup. Will anyone besides commenters be in LA in the near future? Or are we arranging an all-starunknown cast of thousandsseveral?


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:56 PM
horizontal rule
118

You'd be the only straight guy there

Really? Does your wife know that?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 7:56 PM
horizontal rule
119

I second Taix. Convenient to the 2 bus, for those who don't believe that you can get around L.A. sans car.


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
120

117: I'd be interested too. I don't mind lurkers showing up, however. I never realized how many Unfogged lurkers there were until the first time I got linked. It's odd how much this feels like a talkative community, but is in truth a few blowhards and many, many, many silent hecklers.

118: Really? Does your wife know that?

I didn't say I'd go in with you. You're a big boy now, you can handle the room by yourself.


Posted by: SEK | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 8:12 PM
horizontal rule
121

Taix? Unless it's upgraded itself drastically in the last decade, it's a crappy pseudo-French restaurant with lousy decor in a dull neighbourhood. There are better places equally accessible by bus. Like Musso & Frank's. Or someplace at The Grove/Farmer's Market. Or half of West Hollywood. [If B and I come along, we will defend your innocence from all teh gays.]


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 9:28 PM
horizontal rule
122

If the LA Unfogged meet-up were, say, brunch on July 1st, I would already be in LA for a wedding and could also go. Or for drinks later in the evening on June 29th.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 9:29 PM
horizontal rule
123

Taix doesn't seem to have improved if these the comments here are any indication.


Posted by: Biohazard | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 9:46 PM
horizontal rule
124

123: And I even used the Preview. Whatever.


Posted by: Biohazard | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 9:50 PM
horizontal rule
125

I'll do LA. Or even the Bay Area, if I can get someone to watch my damn kid for me.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:43 PM
horizontal rule
126

120: I don't think it's possible to be a silent heckler.


Posted by: marcus | Link to this comment | 05-25-07 11:51 PM
horizontal rule
127

126: mimery


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 12:31 AM
horizontal rule
128

SEK, I should say, I would be happy to meet any of the Unfoggedtariat, silent ones, inclusive.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 12:32 AM
horizontal rule
129

re: 126

In their head, they are heckling.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 12:34 AM
horizontal rule
130

re: 127

Mime-heckling!

[I'd have typed that once I got out of this invisible glass box]


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 12:35 AM
horizontal rule
131

a few blowhards


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 12:37 AM
horizontal rule
132

Sounds like the time to suggest a Fargo meetup again, since you're all having so much trouble finding anything decent in LA.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 5:39 AM
horizontal rule
133

Or even the Bay Area

I don't believe a Bay Area meetup is ever going to happen -- people just keep talking about having one and then never follow through. Teases.


Posted by: Magpie | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 9:15 AM
horizontal rule
134

I'm totally ready to do a Bay Area meetup and have a tentative date from Capps (weekend of June 9) for when he's going to be in town, but nothing final yet.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
135

"it's a crappy pseudo-French restaurant with lousy decor in a dull neighbourhood"

With comfortable chairs, strong drinks, and near-total absence of hipsters. Plus, the French Onion Soup is awesome. And you meet really, really old people there.


Posted by: Beefo Meaty | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
136

Let's just forget all these stupid meetups and continue our normal and customary masturbatory practices. No one's fooling anyone with this shit.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 10:34 AM
horizontal rule
137

I didn't say I was going to go. I don't live in LA! I just wanted to pick the place.


Posted by: Beefo Meaty | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
138

132: You betcha, I'd go to the Fargo meetup.


Posted by: ukko | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
139

OK, so far it's you, me, Chopper, Frowner, and Minneapolitan. Everyone can stay at my brother's house.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
140

A Fargo meetup would be worth it just to spite the stupid Bay Area / LA losers. We wouldn't actually have to have one, we could just report back on a fictitious event.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:10 AM
horizontal rule
141

Yeah, kind of like both times you were supposed to come hang out with me and Chopper in Minneapolis, John.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:11 AM
horizontal rule
142

A Fargo meetup should be partly in Brainerd and partly in Minneapolis.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
143

Cool, you know to do this really right somebody is going to have to make hot dish with a potato chip topping and some sort of a jello salad thing. To capture the true midwestern essence of the local that is. That will show those Californians with the sun and beaches and shit.


Posted by: ukko | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:29 AM
horizontal rule
144

140, isn't that what people do for all the "meetups?"


Posted by: Magpie | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
145

Tweety doesn't live in L.A.? SantaCon, Taix ... weird. You must have invented moving.


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
146

Santacon happens in places other than LA, you know. Racist.


Posted by: Magpie | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
147

Well, my sister has a cabin in Brainerd.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:51 AM
horizontal rule
148

Hey, some of my best friends are New Yorkers.


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
149

141: Jan 2 is not a good meetup date, recent studies have shown. Not for someone who's spent Jan 1 on the train.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 12:11 PM
horizontal rule
150

135: Plus, the French Onion Soup is awesome.

You've clearly never eaten in a real French restaurant. I used to get stuck going to meetings at Taix, back in the days when it was convenient for the downtown lawsters. And nobody not coming to a meet-up gets to have venue input.

Let's get Megan drunk on the 29th of June! Her soon-to-be-wedded friend will appreciate it when she turns up with a hangover and a tattoo reading "I (heart) K-Fed". We could dress up and pretend to be a bachelorette party and get SEK even drunker and insist the he should consider a career in strip-o-grams...


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 1:32 PM
horizontal rule
151

"You've clearly never eaten in a real French restaurant."

I didn't say it was "authentic," I said it was "awesome."


Posted by: Beefo Meaty | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
152

DE, I find it fascinating that you like Musso's but not Taix. It's old school, family-owned and -run, and Echo Park hasn't been a dumpy neighborhood for about a decade.

It's got a great, dark, loungey bar. Pace Tweety, the hipsters do know about it, but the one Talk Talk Talk reading I went to there was wicked fun.

But hey, I'm always up for learning about a redeeming place in West Hollywood. Although I'll be out of town on July 1st (at an equal and opposite wedding in the Midwest), so do your worst.

The French onion soup at Stella in Silver Lake is awesome, too.


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 2:05 PM
horizontal rule
153

The bar is where you want to be.

The hipsters do know about it, but the percentages are more reasonable than most places around there.


Posted by: Beefo Meaty | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
154

Everybody in the world getting married that weekend? Lets do it another time.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 3:03 PM
horizontal rule
155

Also, I'm a hipster, somewhere in the sixtieth percentile of hip (bedhead, adidas, rock band; OTOH, real job, enthusiasm). And Cat and Girl had the last word on "hipster", anyhow.


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 3:34 PM
horizontal rule
156

I don't believe a Bay Area meetup is ever going to happen

It will probably happen before the NC meetup comes to fruition, though.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 4:08 PM
horizontal rule
157

You know what? Whatever! I declare myself ready to meet up any weekend this summer (but not 6/22, because I want to see the Dead Science at 21 Grand, and probably not 6/23, because of Tortoise at the Independent, if I can get/afford tix).

This is going on 6/28 and /29, though, and might be of general interest: "Inside a Broken Clock: Peepshow! A Burlesque
Review Inspired by the music of Tom Waits"


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 4:13 PM
horizontal rule
158

Wrong thread, I guess.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 05-26-07 4:13 PM
horizontal rule