Remember, the geezers can still kick your ass, so get off the lawn.
BTW, I'm thinking Bush twice, unless there's someone else I don't know about.
Clinton murdered Vince Foster in a paranoid coke frenzy. So, there's that.
I thought we had only heard this about W.
Gore, probably, too. And we elected him. Kindasorta.
Carter only did blow in his heart.
With Arafat.
"The survey also found that 42 percent of young Americans thought it was likely or very likely that the nation would reinstate a military draft over the next few years"
Whoa.
2, 4, etc: You don't know that Obama has admitted using cocaine?
13: Just extrapolating from current trends.
But they said that they did not believe Americans would elect someone who had used cocaine
Tommy Ravenel rather conclusively disproves that.
BTW, has anyone tried logging into Nerve Personals? I was sent to FriendFinder.com. I don't want to go through FriendFinder! And I want a president who isn't a wuss about admitting drug use!
Upper-class, Ivy-league trust fund babies. That pretty much mean their parties have coke, so, uh, most of the Senate?
Generation Awesome! has caffeine-charged malt beverages, and we look down on you old timers who *snicker* actually snorted shit up your noses to party later? Pass me another Sparks™, barkeep.
20: "caffeine-charged malt beverages" s/b "Adderall"
14: Obama got elected? Thank fuck. I think I'll get out of bed tomorrow.
17: I was just able to successfully, though I was having some trouble earlier.
Annoying that the NYT didn't, you know, mention the current president in the following paragraph?
Grover Cleveland used cocaine. And he was elected twice. Probably not in your lifetime, though...
I wouldn't vote for anyone who'd gotten a blumpkin.
Yeah, I looked up blumpkin; I'm not proud. And it wouldn't have occurred to me in a million years.
Well, after what happened the last time we elected a candidate who has used cocaine (the last two times, if you generously count both 2000 and 2004), can you blame us? I see no contradiction or ignorance here, just learning from experience, albeit in a post hoc, ergo propter hoc way. Faulty logic is better than no logic.