Let us know what his face and wang look like. If you want to make a special effort to notice something else, do that too.
Is there a strike zone in swimming?
hey, i was pretty hot when i was in my forties.
course, white synthetic leisure suits have gone out of fashion since then.
someone at the wsj has a sense of humor:
an article on mcmansions in china had a picture of a lavishly gaudy mini-versaille, with the caption "bada beijing".
it must be hard to work for the wsj if you have a brain.
Oh, you would be surprised by the people who will say "look at my butt" if you ask nicely. Or if you pay.
We all thought you were going to hire one of those guys who lives in your area and set a record for fastest swimming by an octogenarian.
But this will work almost as well.
What do you hope to learn?
Is it picture time again?
Sure. Guess which one I am.
Trick question! I'm holding the camera.
It all makes sense, but don't tell me how you worked the shutter.
Same as everybody els-- Oh, the shutter.
How to go faster, baby.
i just want to go like some fabulous yellow roman candle
In order to spice this thread up I will link to this thread, which is almost as hilarious as the Obama antichrist thread, but with 1% as many comments.
Me? Thanks Ogged, but I'm still 39 for a couple more weeks.
6: FWIW, the news side of the WSJ is full of people with brains who don't find it difficult to work there at all. What they think about the editorial pages from the planet beyond the barking moon of madness is another matter.
20--
no, i realize that the news side has some extremely sharp people, some of whom even have integrity and honesty as well.
still, it's gotta hurt to know that no matter how well you report the truth on a1, vermont royster or one of his heirs and assigns in barking mad hackery is going to distort it and lie about it back on the editorial page.
a1: possible breakthrough on cancer research
editorial: new cancer research shows need for tax cuts!
So, when Shailagh Murray moved from the WSJ to the Washington Post, did she increase or decrease her integrity? Honestly, as a WSJ reader I never noticed her reporting to be particularly egregious.
