Re: Sadie Blogkins

1

For the purposes of this exercise, consider me single...laydeez.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 8:50 AM
horizontal rule
2

Once every four years? You bloggers are screwed.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
3

1 s/b feel free to ignore imaginary gfs.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
4

2 - People can step up other times. This is just for the shy ones.

(Or the people who still think meeting people from the internet is weird.)


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
5

This is going to go horribly, horribly awry. Do we really want confirmation that w-lfs-n is the mack daddy daddy mack of the whole blogosphere? Won't someone please think of the children?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
6

Is it L'il Abner Day again already?

Does Stupefyin' Jones blog anywhere? Because I'd like to comment on her forum, if you know what I mean and I think you do. Like my daddy says, the Kickapoo Joy Juice needs more body, so let's add a body to it.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:01 AM
horizontal rule
7

commenters should be able to ask that special blogger they feel they have a connection with out on a date

Even the married bloggers! Laydeez.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
8

I've always had a thing for that third lurker from Sheboygan. So, drinks at 8:00?


Posted by: Mo MacArbie | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
9

Wait, bloggers are men and commenters are women? Becks is teh sexist.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
10

I meant sexiEst. Becks, wanna get a drink with me sometime?


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
11

7 is just trying to get some free child care.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
12

What if we're already dating?


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:09 AM
horizontal rule
13

It sounds great, but there's a waiting list for Hilzoy and Hapax is already married.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:09 AM
horizontal rule
14

I don't know what any of the bloggers here look like. Except apoptoser.

Pass.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:09 AM
horizontal rule
15

apoptoser
How many nerds do you think are going to get your little biology joke?


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
16

Are you saying I'm not your type, Ned?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
17

I don't know what any of the bloggers here look like.

Lookist.


Posted by: Mary Catherine | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
18

9 - I didn't mean to imply that men are bloggers and women commenters. Just trying to draw the parallel to the traditional "turnabout" that was done in Ye Olden Days.

That said, let's drink!


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
19

4: I'm married and people still think it's weird.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:13 AM
horizontal rule
20

15: I got it!


Posted by: nerdpostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
21

15: I got it too. I would bet that a lot of nerds are going to get his little biology joke.

I understand, laydeez, if, out of concern for Tim's delicacy, you don't want to reveal your feelings for me in public. Remember, my email address is given on the main page.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
22

I understand, laydeez, if, out of concern for Tim's delicacy, you don't want to reveal your feelings for me


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:23 AM
horizontal rule
23

1.ogged, but he won't like my nostrils :(
2. ben w-lfs-n if he was older like 12 yrs
3. John Emerson again 12 yrs rule, alas!
why 12 yrs difference is not allright is because one can be each other's parent! hypothetically and it's kinda taboo at least in my culture
in Japan females give chocolates to their preferred male, it could be coworkers, girichoko, on the Valentine's and get in return something on 14th, March
i remember i got handkerchiefs


Posted by: read | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
24

Woohoo!

Have I professed a nostril preference? That seems unlikely, even for me.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
25

23- The rule is age/2 + 7. (If you're 20, you can date between 17 and 26. If you're 50, you can date between 32 and 86, etc.) See here for more analysis.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
26

I keep re-freshing this, hoping Jesurgislac is listing me!

This is like valentine's day all over again. My cubby didnt get any cards!


Posted by: Will | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
27

how old is read?


Posted by: Will | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:32 AM
horizontal rule
28

now i have to say something like pwnd, right?
but i'm glad to know that you are OKing hypothetically of course, sorry, the bpl


Posted by: read | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
29

Alas. Read is too old and too young at the same time.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:33 AM
horizontal rule
30

For example, I would be wrong to date anyone older than 108 or younger than 37.5.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:36 AM
horizontal rule
31

Japanese chocolate surprised me with its excellence. Even the humble Men's Pocky beats anything not packaged as gormay chocolate stateside.

Nostrils are definitely an underexplored locus of attraction.

So many of the ladies here seem either nice, funny, or interestingly unpredictable; I guess the little-kid valentines that go to the whole class would defeat the purpose.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:39 AM
horizontal rule
32

Too bad, I hear 110 year olds are great in bed. Just wait a year and you'll be eligible.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
33

There were 104 year old twins here in town until just this year. But I blew my chances.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
34

ogged, I think you know where I am going, love.

My daughter's name is Sadie - she is only 2, but does this mean that on this day she gets to ask out 2 bloggers?


Posted by: Sybil Vane | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
35

I hear 110 year olds are great in bed

Until their hips snap.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
36

Hip replacement is for a reason, Apo.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
37

Until their hips snap.

Like a swimmer?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 9:59 AM
horizontal rule
38

30-odd comments and no calls for Labs. Because everyone knows he's mine?


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
39

Sybil, my dearest, it sounds like you're going to have to fight the ninja.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:04 AM
horizontal rule
40

The only active bloggers who aren't actually married or dating are labs & ben, right? So this is actually just an effort to get the philosophers laid.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
41

AWB, hypothetically want to go out for a hypothetical drink and hypothetical sushi?


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
42

this is actually just an effort to get the philosophers laid.
No wonder it only happens every 4 years.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
43

40: Would Becks have put up the post if she wasn't available for some hot lurker lovin'? I think not.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
44

40: I thought it was Becks trying to get dates.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:17 AM
horizontal rule
45

Fucking Apo, I hate you.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:18 AM
horizontal rule
46

43, 44:

I agree. I assumed this post was so that Becks could get some loving.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:18 AM
horizontal rule
47

Are you asking me out, B?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
48

45: Remaining indifferent to Apo, I love you.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
49

These chips, I'm calling them in.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:20 AM
horizontal rule
50

Remaining indifferent to Apo

Inconceivable!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:21 AM
horizontal rule
51

I believe it's chits you want, SB.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:21 AM
horizontal rule
52

You're chitting me.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:22 AM
horizontal rule
53

49: Those are impressive chips.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:22 AM
horizontal rule
54

This is all about the assertion of the w-lfs-n sex hegemony.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
55

47: If it'll annoy Ned, I am.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:25 AM
horizontal rule
56

55: Awesome. Can you drive?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:27 AM
horizontal rule
57

56: Sure, if you pay.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:28 AM
horizontal rule
58

When the chips are down, it's a good idea to call in one's chits.


Posted by: Otto von Bisquick | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
59

57: For dinner or gas?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
60

Dinner. Asking for cash money is tacky.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
61

Okay then! Because dinner's going to be much cheaper than the gas to get from Cali to Kackalacky.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
62

LOL. I expect dessert, though.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:39 AM
horizontal rule
63

I expect dessert, though.

IYKWIM.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:41 AM
horizontal rule
64

I left that there just for you.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
65

I'd love to ask Lizard out, but Molly and I have a hot date tonight. We are driving to my in-laws so they can watch the kids. After that, all of Ashland, Ohio will open for our evening's pleasure!


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
66

We were thinking of seeing Sweeny Todd.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:43 AM
horizontal rule
67

OH GOD, HERE COMES THE CREME BRULEE!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
68

2 - People can step up other times. This is just for the shy ones.

Wouldn't it be easier to set up a dance card?

max
['Dance Cards from the Event Horizon.']


Posted by: max | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:45 AM
horizontal rule
69

y'know, they say that politics is show business for ugly people. Makes yer think, dunnit?


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:47 AM
horizontal rule
70

I'd love to ask Lizard out

The line starts behind me, Helpy-Chalk.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
71


Between w-lfs-n and Ogged, I'd have to pick...Alameida.


Posted by: Belle Lettre | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
72

If I spent money on my eyebrows, more people than just SCMT would be after me.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
73

Show business is ..... politics for dumb people? Banking for the innumerate? War for cowards?


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
74

OH GOD, HERE COMES THE CREME BRULEE!

To paraphrase the old joke: If it's burnt, you were doing it too fast.


Posted by: Po-Mo Polymath | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:07 AM
horizontal rule
75

The nostril thing read references is from a post title of yours, ogged.

I don't think there are enough single men in the Mineshaft. (I'm too old for Teo by any sensible metric.) And I have enough trouble with hopeless hidden crushes on married men in real life.


Posted by: emir | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:19 AM
horizontal rule
76

I'm getting all of the lovin' I need. Only trying to help out my brethren bloggers.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:23 AM
horizontal rule
77

wait, emir are you a woman or just like men?

I need to pay attention more often.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:25 AM
horizontal rule
78

65, 70: Woohoo! On the Internet, grooming really doesn't matter!


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:25 AM
horizontal rule
79

I'm getting all of the lovin' I need.

It's about quality, not quantity, Becks.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
80

On the Internet, grooming really doesn't matter!

There are lots and lots of websites dedicated to naked, hairy women.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:29 AM
horizontal rule
81

The nostril thing read references is from a post title of yours, ogged.

Ah, so it is.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
82

It's about quality, not quantity, Becks.

I stand by my 76.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:31 AM
horizontal rule
83

82: I understand you have to say that in this forum, Becks. But we're here for you, all the same.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
84

But are you gettin' all you want?


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
85

Will, I was going to say that all was revealed here but that's not obvious from the thread. See this one for the unexciting explanation. Also I don't comment frequently enough to maintain an identity.


Posted by: emir | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:38 AM
horizontal rule
86

84 makes a very good point. Arguably, all the lovin' people *need* = no lovin' at all.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
87

Arguably, all the lovin' people *need* = no lovin' at all.

Everybody
Needs somebody
Everybody
Needs somebody
To love

I need you, you you

[etc.]


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
88

all the lovin' people *need* = no lovin' at all

Maybe among your people.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
89

Arguably, all the lovin' people *need* = no lovin' at all.

The greatest psychologist of the age disagrees when he has one of his characters proclaim I am human and I need to be loved, just like everybody else does.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:54 AM
horizontal rule
90

89: That's no way dissuade me, w-lfs-n.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
91

Alright, I'm off for my hott date. Wish me luck.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
92

I am reminded of the time when Kr/stenko used "Don't you want somebody to love" as an illustrative relative clause of characteristic, and reiterate that I am disappointed in the me-supporting turnout here.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
93

92: Per ogged's broader theory, that's probably because no one wants to indicate to the wide horde of admirers that you are officially in play.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:02 PM
horizontal rule
94

I'm too old for Teo by any sensible metric.

Let's not be too hasty, now.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:05 PM
horizontal rule
95

Given the idiosyncracies of ogged's theory of broads, I'm not sure why anyone would give credence to a yet broader theory of his.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:05 PM
horizontal rule
96

Insensible metrics, it's too dark to read!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:06 PM
horizontal rule
97

95: Not idiosyncratic at all. Indeed, the obvious accuracy of his other theories should give you confidence in this latest one.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
98

Emir, that didnt help much.

It doesnt really matter whether you are a boy or girl (to me.) I was just curious bc I always read you as a boy. It was more about me than you.

Read always seems like a boy to me too.


Posted by: Will | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:09 PM
horizontal rule
99

"He is mine, this disarming giant, this ardent wag, this gin-drinking anagrammatist, this mind's emir, ma tendresse, ma vie!"


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:13 PM
horizontal rule
100

I'm a girl - thought it was somewhere in that second thread. I've often been taken for a guy on the internet, which is highly amusing to my RL friends.


Posted by: emir | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:15 PM
horizontal rule
101

100:
Interesting. I cannot identify why I thought you were a boy.


Posted by: Will | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
102

"Emir", as an English word, is masculine (although I can't think of the feminine equivalent). Probably affected your thinking without your being consciously aware of it.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:28 PM
horizontal rule
103

English nouns don't have genders.

Emirs, the people, are men.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
104

88, 89: "Arguably." I did not say that this was my pov.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:38 PM
horizontal rule
105

I don't think I can fight for you ogged. See the wimpiness I have been referencing all week. Not meant to be.


Posted by: Sybil Vane | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:40 PM
horizontal rule
106

It doesnt really matter whether you are a boy or girl (to me.)

Broad minded, you are.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 12:40 PM
horizontal rule
107

41: Any hypothetical time, Chopper!


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:30 PM
horizontal rule
108

103: but English has gendered nouns, aviatrix.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:35 PM
horizontal rule
109

I was debating arguing that. I think w-lfs-n's position, which I think is right in some sense, is that 'aviatrix' and similar aren't nouns with grammatically feminine gender, which doesn't exist in English, but nouns that denote people of female biological sex, and calling them gendered nouns is at least inexact.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
110

Broad minded, you are.

Bigger dating pool, too.


Posted by: soup biscuit | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
111

Saying "The aviatrix ate his breakfast" is not ungrammatical, though it describes a logical impossibility.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:44 PM
horizontal rule
112

Saying "The aviatrix ate his breakfast" is not ungrammatical, though it describes a logical impossibility.

"The aviatrix and her son sat down at the table one morning. The son wasn't hungry, so the aviatrix ate his breakfast along with her own."


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
113

Saying "The aviatrix ate his breakfast" is not ungrammatical, though it describes a logical impossibility.

It was a lazy Sunday. John Wayne wandered down into the kitchen at 11, wondering if the plums he'd been saving in the icebox were still there or if that damn Earhart had made good on her threats to take them. He entered the room just in time to see her take a bite from the second. The pit from the first lay there on the floor. She hadn't even bothered to pick it up. He stood there fuming. The aviatrix ate his breakfast. Finally he returned upstairs in silence. He thought: hell is other people.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:49 PM
horizontal rule
114

Ned didn't say anything about the sentence "the son wasn't hungry, so the aviatrix ate his breakfast along with her own", Knecht.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:50 PM
horizontal rule
115

You're just sore about being pwned, w-lfs-n.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:50 PM
horizontal rule
116

Mine is obviously superior to yours, and well worth the twenty or thirty seconds extra time it took.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
117

I knew you guys were going to do that. Geez.

Anyway, "The aviatrix ate their breakfast" IS ungrammatical. Ceteris parabus.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
118

That's "paribus".


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:00 PM
horizontal rule
119

107: Woohoo! I still hypothetically got it!


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
120

I meant Parabus, New Jersey.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:11 PM
horizontal rule
121

Ma Rainey and Beethoven once unwrapped a bedroll to the players now in rehearsal around the flagpole ... but the aviatrix ate their breakfast.


Posted by: Nworb Werdna | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:30 PM
horizontal rule
122

I always knew that read was female, just as I guessed long before anyone that Amish Lovelock was male -- I apparently have a talent for figuring out the gender of Japanese commenters.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
123

Oh shit. I've just been informed that read's not Japanese!


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
124

Adam Kotsko: objectively pro-they-all-look-alike.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:50 PM
horizontal rule
125

I *told* you to play it off like you were joking. Dummy.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:51 PM
horizontal rule
126

why, i'm not Japanese and male
i like many things Japanese though, not anime and SMAP
i'm a 100% of Mongol descent, within Mongols though there are also distinctions, so i'm a half-buriad half-khalkh(borjigin) Mongol
about my unmaleness i have no explanations
i thought i sound girlish enough


Posted by: read | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
127

I change my mind. After reading 113, I choose w-lfs-n.


Posted by: Belle Lettre | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:01 PM
horizontal rule
128

I change my mind. After reading 113, I choose w-lfs-n.

Gawdfuckingdammit! I told you this would happen! And now it has begun.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:05 PM
horizontal rule
129

109: oh, I pretty much knew I was wrong. I was just trying to provoke w-lfs-n, which Ned did better than I did.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:08 PM
horizontal rule
130

Shit, I've had secret blog crushes on all of you at one time or another. My blog crushes even extend to those lurkers who haven't even commented yet, but are watching, reading, ever-present and silent... those are perhaps my favourites. This constant state of blog-arousal has sparked a forever-fluttering heart condition that has no remedy.

I am deeply and passionately in lust with all of you.

Will you be my leap-year laydeez (gents included)?

With love,
Flitty McFlutter

PS This love note is not a joke.


Posted by: Flitty McFlutter | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:16 PM
horizontal rule
131

130: Slut.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:17 PM
horizontal rule
132

131: Slut shamer.


Posted by: Otto von Bisquick | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
133

Based on a quick look at your blog, absolutely. I'll even overlook the fact that you seem to be a Canadian.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:19 PM
horizontal rule
134

132: I am and have long been America's Foremost Slut Encourager! When others attacked Slut-o-ween, I defended it. When...I'm sure there have been other instances.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
135

You've been awfully discouraging to poor young w-lfs-n, Tim.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
136

What is the point of a thread like this if a quick search in it for my name doesn't turn up ten or twenty hits, hmm?


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:27 PM
horizontal rule
137

Ah, but if they only knew who you really were, they'd be languishing after you, restrained only by your assumed unattainability.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:29 PM
horizontal rule
138

Psst!...Gonerill...I think 137 is LB's way of asking you out.


Posted by: Mary Catherine | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:33 PM
horizontal rule
139

130: Purrrrrrrrr....
133: same as above.

Gonerill, you are the spice in my masalla naan, you are the sugar in my curry; you are the whiskers on my cat. What I mean to say is: It is possible to live without you, but it would be a dreadful and dreary experience.

I'm off to compose some petrarchan sonnets for each of you. (I must woo before I lust...)


Posted by: Flitty McFlutter | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
140

I am slightly wounded by the fact that w-lfs-n isn't responding to my blatant come on.

Alas, to be that girl at the Sadie Hawkins dance.

Reminds me of going stag to Prom because I was on Prom Committee, and watching the boy I longed for dance with some other girl.


Posted by: Belle Lettre | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:37 PM
horizontal rule
141

126: I repent in dust and ashes.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
142

You've been awfully discouraging to poor young w-lfs-n, Tim.

There's a difference between a slut and a young Rasputin.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:46 PM
horizontal rule
143

Has w-lfs-n even had sex?


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:49 PM
horizontal rule
144

143: w-lfs-n doesn't "have" sex; w-lfs-n is sex.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:50 PM
horizontal rule
145

There is a sense in which SCMT is actually the one most aggressively hitting on w-lfs-n.


Posted by: Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:51 PM
horizontal rule
146

You've noticed that, have you?

If, of course, implying that someone is a nun-raper can be said to be a form of courtship.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:52 PM
horizontal rule
147

I love everybody, especially you.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:53 PM
horizontal rule
148

If w-lfs-n ever had sex, he would cease to be w-lfs-n. Teo, by contrast, will fully become Teo when he finally has sex.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 3:53 PM
horizontal rule
149

If, of course, implying that someone is a nun-raper can be said to be a form of courtship.

Did you hear that faint poink! noise? It was the sound of a fetish site manifesting out of nothing. I do not mean a site dedicated to a fetish for nun-raping, I mean a website dedicated to a fetish for suggesting that another is a nun-rapist. No nuns are harmed, it's mainly just people shouting nun-raper! at one another and then having sex.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 4:29 PM
horizontal rule
150

Did you hear that faint poink! noise? It was the sound of a fetish site manifesting out of nothing.

Rule 34 of the internet.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 5:47 PM
horizontal rule
151

After that, all of Ashland, Ohio will open for our evening's pleasure!

I've been through Ashland, Ohio. I can't say that I am envious.


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 7:40 PM
horizontal rule
152

Noted:

In the Li'l Abner comic strip, Sadie Hawkins was the daughter of one of Dogpatch's earliest settlers, Hekzebiah Hawkins. When she reached the age of 35, still a spinster,

Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 02-29-08 7:57 PM
horizontal rule
153

Happy birthday, Ben.


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 03- 1-08 8:51 AM
horizontal rule
154

I've only ever been out on one date with a man, and it was indescribably boring, mostly because the man was a terrible bore.

We met over the intranet. We were both working for IBM, but in his case he actually liked it. I should have known better.

No offense, Will, but I think I'll still hold out for Hilzoy or Hapax.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 03- 1-08 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
155

I got the social anxiety bad, me. Y'all stay over there on the back side of the screen, thanx.


Posted by: W. Kiernan | Link to this comment | 03- 2-08 4:51 PM
horizontal rule