Re: I see the next New Yorker has arrived early

1

the execution is flawed because it makes me think of John McCain's ass

Labs, Labs. *Now* you quail?


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:14 PM
horizontal rule
2

Oh I don't know. His ass looks very pert.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:19 PM
horizontal rule
3

Awesome. I posted my idea at CT, but Eric's a full professor so unlike me he can beaver away at photoshop on a Monday afternoon, whereas I have to ... um ... never mind.


Posted by: Kieran | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:21 PM
horizontal rule
4

Much too pert for a man of his age.

Okay, I guess Labs is right. Flawed execution. (Also, the polluting smokestacks look far too much like the twin towers at first glance.)


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:21 PM
horizontal rule
5

the polluting smokestacks look far too much like the twin towers at first glance

That's what I thought they were until my third or fourth glance.


Posted by: Kieran | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:26 PM
horizontal rule
6

There's not enough about his personal life. He should be walking with a blonde woman who is gulping down pills, while throwing a paper airplane with DIVORCE written on it at a woman in a wheelchair.


Posted by: Fatman | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:27 PM
horizontal rule
7

You all have carefully constructed opinions about McCain's posterior?


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:35 PM
horizontal rule
8

||

Grammar bleg:
"Given two apples A_1 and A_2, we say that A_1 is happily sitting near A_2 if a cumbersome mathematical condition is met."

Should there be a comma after A_2?

|>


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:38 PM
horizontal rule
9

6: Why must you neglect the illegitimate babies?


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:38 PM
horizontal rule
10

8: yes.

(but what do I know?)


Posted by: soup biscuit | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:41 PM
horizontal rule
11

The second A_2, you mean? No. But I want to see a comma after "Given two apples"


Posted by: Sybil Vane | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:42 PM
horizontal rule
12

10: I had one in, but then a proofreader took it out. SCREW THEM!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:42 PM
horizontal rule
13

11: No, the first A_2. Should there really be a comma after "Given two apples"?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:43 PM
horizontal rule
14

"A_1 and A_2" is an appositive, right?


Posted by: Sybil Vane | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:43 PM
horizontal rule
15

7: no, we have ill-conceived reactions that we cover with obsessive rationalizations.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:44 PM
horizontal rule
16

Where is W-lfs-n when you need him?


Posted by: Belle Lettre | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:44 PM
horizontal rule
17

"A_1 and A_2" is an appositive, right?

That depends on what appositive means.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:45 PM
horizontal rule
18

7: Not "you all." Labs. Who has carefully considered opinions about everyone's ass. As you know. Full well, iykwim.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:46 PM
horizontal rule
19

I think you think too much about McCain's rear end. And commas.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:46 PM
horizontal rule
20

They might be, but I'm notta positive.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:46 PM
horizontal rule
21

I would punctuate with two commas, as Sybil suggested in 11.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:47 PM
horizontal rule
22

Who has carefully considered opinions about everyone's ass

I better start wearing my baggy trousers around here.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:47 PM
horizontal rule
23

"Given two apples A_1 and A_2, we say that A_1 is happily sitting near A_2 if a cumbersome mathematical condition is met."

Should be:

Given two apples, A_1 and A_2, we say that A_1 is happily sitting near A_2 if a cumbersome mathematical condition is met.

If the sentence is meant to define "happily sitting" then you could to \emph{happily sitting}, too.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:48 PM
horizontal rule
24

I'm notta positive.

Chico Marx humor never gets old.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:48 PM
horizontal rule
25

Those weren't the twin towers? And what's the deal with the smallpox?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:48 PM
horizontal rule
26

Appositive means a noun or noun phrase that immediately follows another, more general noun, clarifying the former. E.g. "Obama's problems, race and Muslim-ness,..." where "Race and Muslim-ness" is an appositive phrase.


Posted by: Sybil Vane | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:48 PM
horizontal rule
27

I better start wearing my baggy trousers around here.

I'm forming opinions about your trunk by the minute.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:48 PM
horizontal rule
28

P, wn3, d.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:49 PM
horizontal rule
29

27: Cheeky.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:49 PM
horizontal rule
30

Those weren't the twin towers?

Which you can tell because there are three of them.

And what's the deal with the smallpox?

You've never seen an elderly person from a sunny climate, have you?


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:51 PM
horizontal rule
31

29: This could get hairy.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:51 PM
horizontal rule
32

31: Unless properly analized.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:52 PM
horizontal rule
33

On the other hand, if the phrase isnt an appositive, e.g. "Given choices A and B, I chose C" then you don't want a comma.


Posted by: Sybil Vane | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:52 PM
horizontal rule
34

I'm forming opinions about your trunk by the minute.

Gosh, this is worse than RMP.

Besides, you can see at least part of my trunk on the blog, somewhere.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:53 PM
horizontal rule
35

32: Oh man, my spelling error will be the butt of a future w-lfs-n joke.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:53 PM
horizontal rule
36

these double-entendres are really assinine


Posted by: Michael | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:53 PM
horizontal rule
37

I had to look at the picture for a couple minutes before I saw either the "twin towers" OR the "smokestacks". Apparently the negative space between the blinding beams of light on the left side are the smoke stacks.

I had interpreted the blinding, unearthly light and the mushroom cloud as both representing the nuclear war that McCain's policies would make inevitable.


Posted by: Fatman | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:53 PM
horizontal rule
38

For future references, I propose that McCain's ass be referred to at "the Panama Canal".


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:55 PM
horizontal rule
39

at s/b as


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:55 PM
horizontal rule
40

You've never seen an elderly person from a sunny climate, have you?

Where "elderly" = "38 or over". Or maybe that goes without saying for "elderly" in general.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:55 PM
horizontal rule
41

We can't keep up these jokes. We're starting to crack right down the middle.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:56 PM
horizontal rule
42

38: Teh awesome.

40: I DENY IT.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:56 PM
horizontal rule
43

A man, an ass, a canal: McCainama!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:57 PM
horizontal rule
44

37: Me too.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:57 PM
horizontal rule
45

38

Coincidence? Or intentionally bitter pill? Knowing Gonerill's literary reputation for sharpness I fear the latter.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:58 PM
horizontal rule
46

He really does appear to be prepared for an enema of the state.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:59 PM
horizontal rule
47

37: Me too.

Well, I give up. No career in New Yorker cover art for me.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 8:59 PM
horizontal rule
48

Now don't go mooning about over it.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:01 PM
horizontal rule
49

45: Coincidence. Who's 38? Not you, I hope.

Conjectures about my literary sharpness have, as you know, been refuted.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:01 PM
horizontal rule
50

No career in New Yorker cover art for me.

Your attempt was a flash in a pan.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:03 PM
horizontal rule
51

Who's 38? Not you, I hope.

Consider your hopes dashed, matey.

Goneril's sharpness is indeed literary legend, though.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:03 PM
horizontal rule
52

McCain had to put some ointment on his Panama Canal because the locks were acting up again.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:03 PM
horizontal rule
53

Just to be safe, no masturbating to John McCain.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:04 PM
horizontal rule
54

For some reason the \emph is cracking me up. Probably because this is what counts as entertainment in my life.


Posted by: Cala | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:04 PM
horizontal rule
55

Just to be safe, no masturbating to John McCain.

It really does make you wonder who he'll choose as his number two.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:06 PM
horizontal rule
56

McCain had to put some ointment on his Panama Canal because the locks were acting up again.

I hear there's a long-standing plan to widen it.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:07 PM
horizontal rule
57

Also, I heart Cala.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:07 PM
horizontal rule
58

Oh I don't know. His ass looks very pert.

He'd definitely be strong in a pinch.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:13 PM
horizontal rule
59

Ypud think that McCain would be doing better among latinos after that traitor Jimmy Carter handed them control of the Panama Canal.


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:14 PM
horizontal rule
60

Ipud, pud I?


Posted by: Fatman | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:18 PM
horizontal rule
61

60: I think FL was trying to link to this.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 9:20 PM
horizontal rule
62

61: No shit kit is complete without one!

Goneril's sharpness is indeed literary legend, though.

The version from Pogo is better.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 11:00 PM
horizontal rule
63

I'm for "Given two apples $A_1$ and $A_2$ we say that $A_1$ is happily sitting....", because my impression is that it's standard mathematical usage. Maybe because somehow "$A_1$ and $A_2$" is really the name of what you're given, and "two apples" is just sort of playing a clarifying role. Am I wrong? I agree that appositives are ordinarily set off by commas in normal English, but mathematical writing is not normal English. "Given an apple, $A$, we..." just looks awkward to me.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 07-14-08 11:16 PM
horizontal rule
64

re: 54

Yeah, me too. And the $foo_subscript$'s from essear.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 12:33 AM
horizontal rule
65

This whole thread is making me smile, top to bottom.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 3:19 AM
horizontal rule
66

small pox
i thought secondary lues maybe, and that he should sue if it's implied something


Posted by: read | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 6:24 AM
horizontal rule
67

I mean, it's kind of funny, but I still think it's gross that people here contributed to the general and generic feeling of outrage!!!1!1 over an issue that merits no more than a "bfd." I wish I'd had more time yesterday to discuss but I feel sore about this.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 8:24 AM
horizontal rule
68

67, in its outrage!!1!1 over the outrage!!!1!1 over the cover, is as silly as any of it.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 8:29 AM
horizontal rule
69

Your face is as silly as any of it. Your John McCain ass face.

I don't know if it's a feed-the-beast thing or it stems from some need to have a lede story and I'm going to say this although it is one of the least original things ever said about the blogosphere but its lens effect can really distort the significance of a story. When it comes to art and editorializing art, though, this kind of story can have a big impact on what can be published. A day or two later, it turns out that no one actually cares at all but this is gong to hang over artists and editors.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
70

Dude, The New Yorker can take it. Controversy sells 7500 word John McPhee pieces about rail freight!


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 8:39 AM
horizontal rule
71

I'm not so worried about the New Yorker, but further down on the rack?


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 8:44 AM
horizontal rule
72

Should we really lose sleep if magazine editors start worrying that people won't understand when their racist jokes are only meant ironically?


Posted by: Gabriel | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 9:35 AM
horizontal rule
73

OT: Hey, is this the underwater sex blog?


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 9:41 AM
horizontal rule
74

71: further down on the rack nobody's worried about them. The frustration was a product of the prominence of the platform.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 9:46 AM
horizontal rule
75

it's kind of funny, but I still think it's gross

Everyone's a cri-- oh, wait, 'smasher actually is a critic.


Posted by: Eric | Link to this comment | 07-15-08 7:28 PM
horizontal rule