Re: Xeni failed to make a joke correctly

1

More properly, "Bush^WObama"


Posted by: soup biscuit | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
2

B Obama is technically correct, though.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
3

Soup is, of course, right.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
4

Sort of. If you squint and move your head back and forth real fast.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
5

2 doesn't work so much in context though (the picture shows this)


Posted by: soup biscuit | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
6

I was under the impression that you fastidiously avoided boingboing, Ben.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:39 AM
horizontal rule
7

The link was in The Weblog's sidebar. It was too late, once I realized what was happening.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
8

5: True. And 4 was to 2 in recognition of same.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
9

I don't think that was the real Xeni posting, as it lacked a link to Reverse Cowgirl.


Posted by: snarkout | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
10

When I was in Portland a group of pranksters changed the name of (IIRC) Front Street to Malcolm X Street. Very professional fast moving teams slapped appropriately sized stickers on all the signs along the whole length of the street. One of the ringleaders (I think the instigator, actually), Igor Vamos, went on to co-found the Yes Men.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
11

It was too late, once I realized what was happening.

And by then, I imagine, it felt too delicious to stop. Speaking of which, about half way down this page, (the link is to Journalista, the comics blog. It's safe.) there's a link to a video featuring The Flash fellating a completely motionless Spider-Man strapped to a board. Sort of looks like he's preparing to waterboard him.


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 11:58 AM
horizontal rule
12

11: Well, thanks, Populuxe. I can now say I've seen the strangest thing I'll see for at least a month. (Spiderman does not seem to be conscious, which is a little disturbing. The not-really-erect thing also points to "bashed over the head before the making of this video.")


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
13

I don't get it.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
14

Search for "^H" here or looking here. Short answer is that "^H" (the caret represents that it's a chord: control-H) is for historical reasons the canonical textual representation of deleting. It's analogous to the use of strike to simultaneously say something, take it back (insincerely), and say something else instead. "^W" deletes the preceding word, "^H" the preceding character, so you need as many "^H"s as characters you want to delete.

This is one of the things that doesn't really have an analogue in speech, I think.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
15

The idea that hacker culture and Heidegger independently invented this device is highly amusing to me.

"Seyn^H^H^H^H"


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
16

14 s/b "Great, start 'em young."


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:02 PM
horizontal rule
17

A comment at boingboing, a front page post at Unfogged.

We report you decide.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:12 PM
horizontal rule
18

Did you guys realize that Slashdot still exists, too? I always assume that sites go away when I stop visiting them, but I guess that's not true.


Posted by: Otto von Bisquick | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:18 PM
horizontal rule
19

Spiderman does not seem to be conscious, which is a little disturbing.

I'm a little disturbed by the collision of universes, too. They couldn't get Captain America?


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:26 PM
horizontal rule
20

And since when is The Flash a "villain," as the video calls him? My comic-book knowledge is extremely limited, but I thought he was a good guy.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
21

Did you guys realize that Slashdot still exists, too?

Might have just been replaced with a script. Is that "exists" ?


Posted by: soup biscuit | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
22

You never know, AWB, he could be the Reverse Flash, newly emerged from the Speed Force.


Posted by: snarkout | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:49 PM
horizontal rule
23

Yeah, I'm not buying it. Remember how surprised the Flash was when the Pied Piper came out?


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 1:51 PM
horizontal rule
24

14: I didn't ask for an explanation.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
25

you can hardly be surprised you got one though, B.


Posted by: soup biscuit | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
26

Did she express surprise?


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
27

If I hadn't provided one, she'd have complained about that.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
28

I am surprised. Benjamin usually takes statements very literally, and often fails to supply explanations even when they *are* asked for, if one doesn't do it *just so*.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
29

I was surprised too. There are many people here who are overly eager to supply explanations, but ben isn't usually one of them.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:29 PM
horizontal rule
30

29: overly eager to supply explanations

Maybe in this case he was exactly the right amount of eager, and B is just being B. Wouldn't surprise me.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:39 PM
horizontal rule
31

So everyone was behaving exactly as expected? That's a relief.


Posted by: Otto von Bisquick | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:50 PM
horizontal rule
32

Maybe in this case he was exactly the right amount of eager

Yeah, *that'll* be the day.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 2:55 PM
horizontal rule
33

I was surprised too. There are many people here who are overly eager to supply explanations, but ben isn't usually one of them.

Indeed, I had to scroll back up to confirm that 14 was, indeed, ben. When I first read it, I vaguely ascribed it to somebody else.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 3:29 PM
horizontal rule
34

So much for the old implicit vs. explicit debate.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
35
Posted by: | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 3:42 PM
horizontal rule
36

So much for the old implicit vs. explicit debate.

I hated myself as I was doing it.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
37

They couldn't get Captain America?

I hardly think necrophilia would improve things.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 4:09 PM
horizontal rule
38

Also, surely I'm not the only person who assumed Spidey's motionlessness indicated that The Flash was using super speed and the film was simply timed to take that into account.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 4:30 PM
horizontal rule
39

38: That is brilliant. I did not realize were were watching in Flash time.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 4:47 PM
horizontal rule
40

One of the many things that disturbed me about that video was that the site was free and the uploader was anonymous: this was a labor of love, I guess, and that is so weird. Are there a lot of slash reenactment sites out there?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 5:12 PM
horizontal rule
41

Oh god, slash fiction. I've been haunted for the last couple weeks realizing that per whoever's law (Apo?) that whenever you imagine a kink or genre of slash fiction, it arrives.

I've been watching too much kid's TV lately, so for all the parents of young kids out there, let me say this: Backpack/Boots slash fiction.

Anything that you might need
I've got inside for you.

Yum yum yum delicioso!

I've been too afraid to look if it's actually out there.


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 6:43 PM
horizontal rule
42

Also, sorry if I scarred anyone.


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 6:44 PM
horizontal rule
43

Consider me scarred.


Posted by: bestloveddaughter | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 6:50 PM
horizontal rule
44

We did it! We did it! We did it!
Hooray!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 6:53 PM
horizontal rule
45

41: That's Rule 34.


Posted by: snarkout | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 6:57 PM
horizontal rule
46

43: Aren't you married to Apo? And not yet scarred?


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 7:27 PM
horizontal rule
47

Note that she didn't say she was scarred by this specifically. She could have already been scarred.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 7:52 PM
horizontal rule
48

46: Nah, thick skinned.


Posted by: bestloveddaughter | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 9:45 PM
horizontal rule
49

(34) to 41.

whenever you imagine a kink or genre of slash fiction, it arrives.


Posted by: E. | Link to this comment | 01-21-09 9:52 PM
horizontal rule
50

45: My workplace would not look kindly on my checking it from here, but could someone see if wetriffs.com actually has something on it now?


Posted by: Tom Scudder | Link to this comment | 01-22-09 8:31 AM
horizontal rule
51

It does.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-22-09 8:34 AM
horizontal rule