Re: Your "honor".

1

Togopwned


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
2

Christ what assholes.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
3

...Totally keeping that one to belabor privatize-everything jerks with.

Good heavens, the degree of premeditation...


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:37 PM
horizontal rule
4

Holy shit. Would it be wrong to hope that at least on "victim notification" when these clowns are released goes to someone who developed a serious mean streak while incarcerated?


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:39 PM
horizontal rule
5

And it raised concerns about whether juveniles should be required to have counsel either before or during their appearances in court and whether juvenile courts should be open to the public or child advocates.

But not, evidently, about the advisability of running jails for profit.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
6

But not, evidently, about the advisability of running jails for profit.

Well, it's still America.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
7

Thank god for that!


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
8

I should read that blog, I guess.

It's gone downhill since all the rifraf showed up.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
9

Also the rifffrafff.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:45 PM
horizontal rule
10

One of many reminders that, not matter how much it seems that way, I don't actually live in the most corrupt part of PA.


Posted by: MH | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:46 PM
horizontal rule
11

I really hope that they are not entitled to immunity from civil suits or in a legal defense paid for by the state.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:46 PM
horizontal rule
12

I've been crazy busy at work today, and the last comment I'd read on that thread was LB's comment three up from your link to that story.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
13

11: They probably are covered. PA officials are remarkably unable to police their own ranks. A former State Sen. just testified that he got a $1 million dollar gift from a 'friend'. He's not on trial for the gift (or for not reporting the gift), but for, among other things, using state funds to buy laptops for his daughter and butler.


Posted by: MH | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:51 PM
horizontal rule
14

PA Senators get butlers? Wow.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
15

I don't think they get butlers, but some of them get big enough gifts to hire them. The $ is in the first link, the butler in the 2nd.

http://www.postgazette.com/pg/09044/948902-454.stm

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09042/948277-454.stm


Posted by: MH | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:56 PM
horizontal rule
16

PA Senators get butlers? Wow.

Well, butt-something, at least.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
17

Which isn't to say that locking up kids for kickbacks isn't much, much worse. Just that the sense of entitlement is stunning.


Posted by: MH | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
18

Pwned. I should read that blog, I guess.

Eh. That blog's been going downhill since ogged left ogged came back BPhD came back BPhD left Labs showed his colon.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
19

Labs' colon was definitely a high point.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:01 PM
horizontal rule
20

From the link in 15:

The pair also owned a plane together. In another e-mail exhibit, Mr. Fumo once wrote Mr. Marcus to beseech him to OK the use of the plane even though the two of them were trying to economize at the time.

"Remember your words," Mr. Fumo wrote Mr. Marcus, 'No one that I love is going to fly commercial.' "

'No one that I love is going to fly commercial' is totally going in my pre-nup.


Posted by: JRoth | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
21

Nevertheless, I hope they're both waking up at night in cold sweats.

I would've hoped they would be sentenced to and equivalent amount of time as each and every improperly sentenced juvenile received.

They say that there were 5000 juveniles sentenced, and that the state rate was 1 in 10 and his rate of sentencing was 1 in 4 so (5000* .25) - (5000 * .1) = gives me 750 improperly sentenced juveniles. Assuming an average sentence of 30 days each (I'm going under, since I would actually guess the average sentence is closer to 90 days), that's 750 * 30 = 22500 days or 61 and a half years.

That seems fair. They could serve it in the equivalent of a juvie facility.

max
['87 months seems a bit light.']


Posted by: nax | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
22

The difficulty is that judges often have a tremendous amount of discretion so each individual suit might be difficult. But, each case would have to be lots of fun for the plaintiffs to have in front of a jury.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
23

But not, evidently, about the advisability of running jails for profit.

Private for-profit jails are a monumentally shitty idea in a system made up of shitty ideas.


Posted by: inaccessible island rail | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
24

11: God, one would have to hope that civil immunity can't extend to criminal conduct -- like you can't get insurance to cover your intentional conduct.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
25

19: Let's not neglect apo's nipple, though.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
26

24: I don't know about that, but I bet they get their state pension without a hitch.


Posted by: MH | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:12 PM
horizontal rule
27

25: Two great tastes.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:12 PM
horizontal rule
28

God, one would have to hope that civil immunity can't extend to criminal conduct -- like you can't get insurance to cover your intentional conduct.

How does one prove that any one case was outside his duties? On any given case, it seems that he had the discretion to send them to detention.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:14 PM
horizontal rule
29

26:

Since state law forbids retirement benefits to judges convicted of a felony while in office, the judges would also lose their pensions.

Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:15 PM
horizontal rule
30

29: Maybe I'm too cynical. Anyway, thanks.


Posted by: MH | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
31

Eh. That blog's been going downhill since ogged left ogged came back BPhD came back BPhD left Labs' showed his colon became a private, for-profit concern.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
32

I can. not. believe that n most states including PA fucking children can waive their right to counsel? Seriously?


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
33

on 32, from the linked article in the OP:

The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 that children have a constitutional right to counsel. But in Pennsylvania, as in at least 20 other states, children can waive counsel, and about half of the children that Judge Ciavarella sentenced had chosen to do so. Only Illinois, New Mexico and North Carolina require juveniles to have representation when they appear before judges.


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
34

Only Illinois, New Mexico and North Carolina require juveniles to have representation when they appear before judges.

Go Illinois!


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:25 PM
horizontal rule
35

27: Unfogged doesn't want colons with good taste, they want colons that taste good. Sorry bensy.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:26 PM
horizontal rule
36

they want colons that taste good. Sorry bensy.

Why apologize?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:27 PM
horizontal rule
37

34: Those three states are no doubt magnets for juvenile delinquents as a result of their softhearted policies.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:28 PM
horizontal rule
38

Jesus Christ. Without knowing details, seven years seems like a pretty lenient plea bargain on its face. One of the worst judicial scandals I've heard about in recent times.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:30 PM
horizontal rule
39

23 is exactly right.

Also, 7 years isn't remotely close to just.

Particularly when you consider the number of people doing a (almost certainly harder) nickle for bullshit like having a joint or a dime bag in their pocket at the wrong time.


Posted by: soup biscuit | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:35 PM
horizontal rule
40

Why apologize?

Maybe you're too young to know such things.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
41

Those three states are no doubt magnets for juvenile delinquents as a result of their softhearted policies.

I don't know which way, if any, the causality runs, but there certainly seems to be a lot of juvenile delinquency around here.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:41 PM
horizontal rule
42

Despite his young age, teo has already had to start yelling at those damn kids to get off his lawn.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
43

They just won't leave!


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
44

Go Illinois!

I was surprised to see North Kackalacky on that list.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:45 PM
horizontal rule
45

43: And why oh why won't they pull up their damned pants?


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:46 PM
horizontal rule
46

44: No-one expects the North Kackalacky Representation!


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 02-13-09 2:47 PM
horizontal rule
47

Particularly when you consider the number of people doing a (almost certainly harder) nickle for bullshit like having a joint or a dime bag in their pocket at the wrong time.

Where on earth on you living that's handing out 5 years for that? Small amounts of weed are a misdemeanor.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 02-14-09 1:28 AM
horizontal rule
48

They're judges. Judges give nice sentences to other judges. Besides, sending people to jail for money is the Great American Way.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 02-14-09 2:42 AM
horizontal rule
49

Where on earth on you living that's handing out 5 years for that

New York, perhaps.

The link doesn't talk about sentencing, per se. It was just the first example of the approach to pot that has been taken by New York, both at the state and city level, since the Rockefeller drug laws.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 02-14-09 1:12 PM
horizontal rule