Re: Transgressily confessily

1

a few of the readers recognized the poor dead pretend baby as being one of these glassy-eyed creepy crawlers.

Is it sick that my first thought on hearing about this particularly amusing detail in the whole so-sick-it's-funny saga, was "So that's what those rather unpleasant dolls are for!"

I always thought they looked like dead babies.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:51 AM
horizontal rule
2

Um.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:59 AM
horizontal rule
3

2: Could there be a creepier pricequote than "$9.95 per unstuffed body"?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
4

Those fake babies look pretty rough. It's hard work being born.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
5

I love the phrase "Münchausen-by-Internet."


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
6

Abortion stops a beating doll heart.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:08 AM
horizontal rule
7

6: "Hold your ear close to babies chest to hear the soft beating sound. What could be more real...."

A flesh baby, for starters.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
8

From the link in 6:

"Hold your ear close to babies chest to hear the soft beating sound. What could be more real...."

Do they really want us to answer that?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
9

Goddamnit.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
10

That's an interesting sort of question.

Just look at that convincing drag queen? What could be more feminine?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:13 AM
horizontal rule
11

"How did you suffer your misadventure, my poor unfortunate immigrant auk?"
"Why, by birth, sir. It runs in my family, this affliction."
"Zounds! Is there nothing that can be done?"


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
12

11: You don't say.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:18 AM
horizontal rule
13

What could be more real

To grow up to be healthy simulacra Baudrillardian babies drink simulac.


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
14

5: Creepiest bit from the Munchausen-by-Internet page: "Brittany Schick of Windsor, CO has multiple online personalities and uses the photographs of online friends as her own. She has been outed on multiple parenting websites for being a faker. In reality, she has no children of her own and works as a nanny."


Posted by: Hamilton-Lovecraft | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
15

Diagnostic refridgerator magnets were wonderful toy sets that seem to have gone out of production. They let you create new DSM categories. I remember seeing "bulimia by proxy" as a fun combination. Now that I google it, though, I see it is a real ailment.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:28 AM
horizontal rule
16

According to the comments at Pandagon, the hoaxer went to Olivet Nazarene. This is the Kotsko alma mater, yes?


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
17

14: Now how the hell do you do a background check for that? heebie and apo, never, never leave your kids with anybody.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
18

jroth and mrh can go ahead and leave their kids anywhere, though.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:33 AM
horizontal rule
19

3: "Biracial babyskin" comes close to being Creepiest Quote Ever(TM).

17: Ask the mineshaft.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
20

Jesus Christ what is wrong with people.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
21

Rob was just teasing you, mrh.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
22

18: Ah, no one's gonna want to sit for them anyway. They don't have good snacks and they've got a v-chip on the TV and computer.

I don't want unhinged nannies near any 2nd gen Unfoggeditarians -- heebie & apo were the parents with babies who were commenting. Forget the "Don't Date Him, Girl" site; we need "Don't Let That Hand Rock the Cradle."


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
23

Whereas rob's spelling in 15 was a salute to heebie.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
24

20 That question is beyond the scope of this thread.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
25

23 ==> 21


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
26

For some reason, the spell check on Google Chrome is not flagging "refridgerator", although MS Word does.

I'm siding with Google in the War to Control Proper Spelling.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
27

If that's the environment in which you're planning to raise your kids, you might as well hand them over to Nanny Dearest right now.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:53 AM
horizontal rule
28

27 to 26?


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
29

28: Hells, yeah!


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:00 AM
horizontal rule
30

I feel like you guys aren't paying enough attention to the fake baby monkeys


Posted by: especially messily | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
31

Fake baby monkeys don't need attention. They don't even *notice* wire monkey mothers.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
32

IZ NOT MONKEYS!1!!


Posted by: OPINIONATED CREEPY FAKE BABY ORANGUTANS (CURRENTLY OUT OF STOCK) | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
33

Oriental Baby Eyes!


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:12 AM
horizontal rule
34

3: "Biracial babyskin" comes close to being Creepiest Quote EverTM.

BTW, "biracial (tan)" is the only alternative to "Caucasian (pink)" and "Caucasian (peach)." Finally, someone affirms the diversity of whiteys.

More items:

If the Make-Your-Own-Chucky doll site were an elaborate hoax, I would have huge respect for its author.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:12 AM
horizontal rule
35

31: OTOH, that experiment ought to get ethics approval pretty easily.


Posted by: Nakku | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
36

Creepy as the pictures are, something tells me those dolls would be about 10x creepier in person.


Posted by: Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:19 AM
horizontal rule
37

I'm tempted to get one of these things so I can leave it in my car on a hot day. Will anyone call the cops? Break a window? Exciting possibilities abound!


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:21 AM
horizontal rule
38

#36. Creepy beyond the nursery of the uncanny valley dolls, even.


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:25 AM
horizontal rule
39

Man, I bet Kaycee Nicole is kicking herself for not thinking of the pro-life slant.


Posted by: snarkout | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:31 AM
horizontal rule
40

It is taking a physical effort not to scream right here, at my desk, after seeing that fucking baby doll site. I refuse to believe that is real. I refuse, I refuse, I refuse.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:35 AM
horizontal rule
41


||

Can I just bitch about something for a minute? I spent all day yesterday and the bulk of today in the company of people who, taken together...

- disparagingly referred to Obama as "the Messiah"
- complained that the worst thing about Obama is that he accuses you of being un-American if you oppose higher taxes on the upper income brackets
- cited the WSJ editorial page as an authoritative source of neutral information
- hold Obama and the Democrats responsible for the increase in the national debt, which will surely be the ruin of the economy
- found the SCOTUS decision on the Chrysler sale to be a travesty of justice
- unironically referred to the possibility of "going Galt" (using those terms)
- asserted that the surest way to mitigate the fiscal impact of retirement benefits and an aging population would be to restore the unregulated sale of tobacco (because the increased medical expense is outweighed in net present value terms by tobacco taxes and lower pension payments, and also because the demographic that is most likely to smoke is also least likely to have made adequate private provision for retirement)
- Regard the possibility of health care reform with unmitigated horror, and the opposition of the AMA as dispositive proof for their view
- Regard Barney Frank as a monster
- Claimed that the only polity to the left of Massachusetts is North Korea
- Claimed that the only reason* Microsoft has not relocated to a lower tax jurisdiction such as Nevada is because of the left-wing ideology of the company's founding shareholders
- Had no compunction about sharing these views because they assume that I would agree with them.

The next time I hear some right-winger whining about how Hollywood or academia is reflexively hostile to conservatives, I'm going to knee him in the balls.

|>


* if you parse this sentence, you will uncover a usage that is anathema to nosflow; so sue me


Posted by: pain perdu | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
42

37: the fuck-with-people potential is unbelievable here.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
43

There's a William Gibson novel - I think it's "All Tomorrow's Parties" - in which a junk dealer gets hold of a shipment of dolls very similar to these, each supposedly made as a replica of a real grandchild, for the benefit of a grandparent who lives a long way away. He tries to sell them to a collector...

"No, my client is interested only in very good condition. Mint in box."
"You don't understand, man. These things were made to be taken out of the box. Looked at. You aren't going to get any that are mint in box."
"Not true. The highest value attaches to units which were delivered, but not unpacked, after the death of the original child."

Brrr.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:38 AM
horizontal rule
44

asserted that the surest way to mitigate the fiscal impact of retirement benefits and an aging population would be to restore the unregulated sale of tobacco

Geez, why don't you just open Soylent Green style suicide parlors.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:39 AM
horizontal rule
45

Geez, why don't you just open Soylent Green style suicide parlors.

I had to go easy on the snark because my boss (alas) one of these people. In these situations, I generally keep my head below the parapet except to throw out the occasional concern-trolling comment intended to sow dissent and confusion among the 'wingers. This was a lot easier when GWB was President, because you just had to point out all the ways in which a real conservative could never endorse the things his administration was doing.


Posted by: pain perdu | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
46

the opposition of the AMA as dispositive proof for their view

Oh, like ObAMA won't have them firmly in his pocket.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
47

||

You were here? And you didn't call a meetup? Hmph!

|>


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
48

OT, but since this is the crazy (non)parent thread - Did anyone else read that article in the NYT about the mom on a mission to eradicate unauthorized junk food? In a limited way, I see her point, but really, it seems to suck all the joy out of life to insist that one cannot eat a cupcake or sell Girl Scout cookies. You can, you know, just have one!


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
49

49: Eh. The mother sounds like a maddening nutcase. On the other hand, it does annoy me that we can't have a Little League game without doughnuts for everyone -- there's no way to discourage it without being a maddening nutcase, but a bunch of nine-year-olds should be able to make it from breakfast to lunch without becoming faint from hunger.

Any kind of organized social kid thing seems to imply a whole lot of junk food these days.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
50

49.49: I forgot to include that one on the Pith Shills thread: Kill the after game snack as soon as you can. (It's tough though, best route is to get a few of the more mature kids to label it like "gay" or something...)


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:14 PM
horizontal rule
51

41: What's a "founding shareholder"?


Posted by: Gabriel | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
52

Claimed that the only reason* Microsoft has not relocated to a lower tax jurisdiction such as Nevada is because of the left-wing ideology of the company's founding shareholders

This is a great example of libertarian doublethink on human motivation. Libertarians generally assert both that unregulated capitalism is the best system because all people are motivated primarily by individual profit and that they world is dominated by people who foolishly allow themselves to be motivated by something other than individual profit.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:24 PM
horizontal rule
53

52. OTOH, they have fucking nerve. Gates and Allen own Microsoft for practical purposes, so from a Libertarian perspective what right do a bunch of nobodys in a bar have to tell them what to do with it? They can take their profits and spend them on third world education if they want - it's their money.


Posted by: OFE | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
54

51, see 53.


Posted by: pain perdu | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:34 PM
horizontal rule
55

49: I think this is where growing up in a hippie enclave totally warped me. When I was growing up, if we got treats at a sports event or Girl Scout meeting or whatever, it was usually fruit, or some very plain crackers + fruit juice, or whatever. Nothing so extravagant as doughnuts! And cupcakes or the like maybe happened once a year. I'm clearly out of touch.


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
56

53: The driving principle for most of the really vocal libertarians isn't liberty; it is egoism. They get singularly upset when people try to help others. This is why you see persistent arguments that this or that form of altruistic action is self defeating. Charity promotes dependence. Attempts to conserve resources merely lower the price for those resources, increasing demand. Etc.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:40 PM
horizontal rule
57

Anybody have a link to the picture of the fake dead baby (the actual one, from the blog)?


Posted by: Yawnoc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
58

55: Yeah, I get cranky partially because I have a sweet tooth and like to bake, and I fairly often on a weekend will think about baking cookies and then decide the kids get fed enough crap outside the house, and feeding them more wouldn't be good for them. And then no homemade cookies.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
59

unironically referred to the possibility of "going Galt"

If I heard someone say that unironically, I couldn't resist asking "When?", whatever the consequences.

On Sunday night I ran into a Republican friend:

Her: "I've just come back from the gun show at the fair grounds."
Me: "Did they have elephant ears? I only go to the fair grounds for elephant ears."
Her: "No. No elephant ears, but they had elephant ivory. Someone was selling Himmler's silverware, too."
Me: "I hope you didn't consider buying it; it was probably his second- or third-best set."


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
60

From the batshit lady's blog:

I am no stranger to losing a baby. I have suffered this type of loss, more than once, to varying degrees, and while the circumstances and times vary (spanning from between my college years through just this last year), the pain is very constant.

Does this mean she really has lost a baby? More than once? Because that's really sad. But what does it mean to lose babies in "varying degrees"?


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
61

57: http://littleaprilroseisfake.blogspot.com/2009/06/here-is-original-pic-posted-of-april.html


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:53 PM
horizontal rule
62

Probably it means "had sex and then turned out to not be pregnant, which I told people was a miscarriage".


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
63

60: You can lose them at the supermarket, or just misplace them in the kitchen.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
64

But what does it mean to lose babies in "varying degrees"?

Sometimes you go back to the last place you saw the baby, and you find it. Or sometimes, you get the baby back, but now it's missing a limb or two. Then there are the ones that just disappear altogether and you have to go make all new replacement ones.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
65

I guess we're even now, heebie.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
66

I know what to do if I want to get "a head"... ...this joke is really too stupid to post...


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
67

That's never stopped anybody else.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
68

Babies really should come with one of those key whistle things, where you can press a remote and they make a sound to tell you where they are or, at the very least, a Clapper and a light so when you lose them you can walk around clapping your hands until you see a light shining from the corner, the bookshelf, the laundry basket, wherever you left them. I think if they had that, plus an invisible fence, parenting would be easy enough for me to give it consideration.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
69

This week, I had a terrible dream that I left a friend's baby in the backseat in a giant parking lot, and that when I realized I had done this, it turned into a desert and the parking lot morphed into a junkyard where they crush cars, and I had to find the baby before it either died of heat or smushing, and all the cars looked like mine.....

Suffice it to say, that one dream convinced me that I should not have children.


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:09 PM
horizontal rule
70

It stopped me once . . . for a while.


Posted by: beamish | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:10 PM
horizontal rule
71

So how many kids do you have now, beamish?


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:12 PM
horizontal rule
72

Other people's dreams have picked up the slack.


Posted by: beamish | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:13 PM
horizontal rule
73

68 is the first time I've heard it suggested that babies should make *more* noise.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:16 PM
horizontal rule
74

Silly Parenthetical, dreams are never about what they're about. Babies, for example, "symbolize something in your own inner nature that is pure, vulnerable, helpless and/or uncorrupted." It's your own pure inner nature that you're irresponsibly allowing to be squashed into a sad little cube of scrap.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:18 PM
horizontal rule
75

73: Not more, just different. I should include that I also want them to come with a mute button.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:20 PM
horizontal rule
76

74: Oh. That's probably just grad school, then. I can have babies after all!


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:21 PM
horizontal rule
77

73: Voiced by somebody without any, it's probably worth noting. Also, if they could wake up more during the night and defecate with greater force and volume, that would be awesome.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:23 PM
horizontal rule
78

I can read apo & Chopper's dreams:

To dream of handling bacon with dirty hands is an ill omen and must be taken with the dream as a whole. Bacon that has gone rancid denotes a failed affair, either love or business. Curing bacon properly is a good sign that you are doing something right.

Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:23 PM
horizontal rule
79

I'm on my phone, not real internet so I don't have the url, but someone should link to the news story about the time some people left their pretend baby in their car and the police busted in to rescue it. In Australia I think.


Posted by: especially messily | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:27 PM
horizontal rule
80

77: Pish posh, apo. I have a very vivid imagination and I imagine that a baby that does not operate in pretty much the same manner as an Aibo needs some engineering improvements before it's really ready for retail. Next time you see me, ask me about my new babysitting service. The motto is, "Honestly, I think babies could use some work."


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:31 PM
horizontal rule
81

I dreamt I went into some stranger's studio and there were these sort of cool paintings there. Should I try to replicate them, or would that be plagiarism?


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:33 PM
horizontal rule
82

if they could wake up more during the night and defecate with greater force and volume

And if they could direct their poop thrust at precise angles, Harrier-style…


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
83

||
Here's an easy helpful thing to do. More info at Obsidian Wings.

"change your twitter settings so that your location is TEHRAN and your time zone is GMT +3.30. Security forces are hunting for bloggers using location and timezone searches. If we all become 'Iranians' it becomes much harder to find them."

|>


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
84

81: Was it Billy Dee Williams' studio?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
85

79: You think correctly!

In addition to this one, there was apparently a similar incident in the US. With a new Hummer.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
86

84: Yes! And you were there! And you, and you!


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
87

83: Pretty sure tweets have a GMT timestamp, and no info about the TZ of the tweeter.


Posted by: Yawnoc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:00 PM
horizontal rule
88

Was last night a night of an unusual number of odddreams? A friend is reporting via FB status that she dreamt that she was a WSJ columnist.


Posted by: Otto von Bisquick | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
89

a bunch of nine-year-olds should be able to make it from breakfast to lunch without becoming faint from hunger

I would not ask of children what I cannot myself do.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
90

Two nights ago, I dreamt that I worked at a high tech firm developing a digital chair. It was like a recliner with USB connectivity. All of the workers in my division existed in a parallel, miniature, dimension. From our world they looked like little grains of dried wheat. We had screwed up the project really badly, and I was trying to keep senior management out of the mini-universe with all my workers.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:10 PM
horizontal rule
91

87: You are mistaken.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:15 PM
horizontal rule
92

90: You disgusting pervert.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
93

I keep forgetting that I have a baby in my dreams, and then having a jolt of remembering and having to drop everything and figure out where she is.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
94

90. OMG they're bringing the giant chicken in to downsize!


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
95

I dreamed I swayed the jury in my Maidenform bra.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
96

91: That is, I don't know what shows up in the tweet, because I dodn't pay attention to these things, but tweeters have that info in their settings, and that info is apparently available to the Iranian authorities.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
97

"But what does it mean to lose babies in "varying degrees"? "

I took this to mean how far along she was before she lost the baby. Which, does matter quite a bit. Or at least did for us.


Posted by: James Madison | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:33 PM
horizontal rule
98

I'm really sorry to hear that, James Madison.

But I don't actually think that's what batshit lady means -- at least, that would be a surprising position for her to take, given her pro-life bona fides. Cryptic Ned probably hits closer to the truth in her case.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
99

Re 49:

Um, couldn't you be a maddeningly enthusiastic sports nutrition nutcase --- I thought that was an allowable category of dietary nutter in the US. Would that work, or is it still maddening nutcasery?

(Doughnuts? WTF? We thought oranges at half time were luxury...)


Posted by: Keir | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:53 PM
horizontal rule
100

99: Well, I could not bring doughnuts myself, but keeping other parents from bringing them would require a fair amount of aggression, and keeping my kids from eating them would require a fair amount of control-freakery.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
101

If I think too much about the batshit lady having too many miscarriages, I start to feel bad for writing the post in the first place. She's still crazy, but crazy is a pretty painful state, so.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:03 PM
horizontal rule
102

101: But surely It is OK to focus upon the culture in which the batshit are sought out and promoted with passionate intensity rather than batshit lady herself.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:07 PM
horizontal rule
103

Heh. 20 obviously crossed with 18, like, five hours ago. But we totally forgot to put Munchausen-by-Internet on our list of nanny interview questions.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:13 PM
horizontal rule
104

Yeah, I suppose if that's the norm, changing it would be hard work, and require annoyingness.


Posted by: Keir | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:18 PM
horizontal rule
105

Count your blessings, LB. When my son was playing baseball, there were a handful of occasions when we arrived at the park by 7 am to warm up for an 8:00 game and left well after dark due to continually metastasizing postgame potlucks. Keeping warmup + game + potluck down to four or five hours was a real win.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
106

100: Bring bananas, but not enough for everyone. Nice fresh ripe bananas that you selectively dole out to kids who did exceptionally well or who need cheering up. Bananas only for the special kids. Donuts for the losers and almost-losers. Sucks to be them.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:34 PM
horizontal rule
107

I just ate kohlrabi for the first time. Thumbs up.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:37 PM
horizontal rule
108

I dreamt last week that I'd taken my son to a job interview (he was the one who wanted the job, and it all became rather embarrassingly obvious that he wasn't capable of doing it), in some people's house. It wasn't until I woke up that I realised it wasn't my actual son, but Freddie from iCarly.


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
109

96: Yeah, you're right. Your self-described location shows up on your public profile. The timezone is only used for display preferences though.


Posted by: Yawnoc | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
110

I dreamed I swayed the jury in my Maidenform bra on my knees.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:53 PM
horizontal rule
111

107: Also, you can sing it to the tune of volare: "kohlrabi, wo-oh-oh-oh"


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 3:55 PM
horizontal rule
112

Bananas only for the special kids. Donuts for the losers and almost-losers.

No, no, no. You need to bring both organic, locally-grown farmers market bananas and conventionally grown megachain supermarket bananas. Then give the former to the winners and the latter to the losers, along with a lecture about how the good kids are getting to be socially responsible while the bad kids are not.


Posted by: Otto von Bisquick | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 4:22 PM
horizontal rule
113

Ack! Not another food thread!


Posted by: paranoid android | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 5:08 PM
horizontal rule
114

Since folks were retailing dreams upthread, I will add that the other night I dreamed that I was visiting Slavoj Zizek, who was the father in the Duggar family (Quiverfull wingnuts of some kind).

I will also add, since all threads inexorably become food threads, that I just baked the most delicious vegan calzone and even though the dough that I used is from a recipe that I tweaked a bit it worked. (Filling--sauteed onions, spinach, broccoli, paprika, turmeric, lemon juice, salt, pepper, nutritional yeast).


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 6:04 PM
horizontal rule
115

I dreamt that the world had run out of helium and all the equipment using He as a carrier had switched to skim milk, which we could get from the grocery but it had to be fresh, so labs were full of hidden fridges for the day's haul and also of grad students grimly chugging day-old milk as free food. Everything smelled OK, but milky.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 6:08 PM
horizontal rule
116

Coincidentally, I bought skim milk for laboratory use today, and it was not in a dream but in this hell we call reality.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 6:24 PM
horizontal rule
117

I had that stupid teeth and gums rotting out of your head dream. And then my cell phone fell in the toilet.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 6:35 PM
horizontal rule
118

I had a dream a month or so ago that I got shot in the neck. A bit of the slow motion thing when I felt the bullet rip through the left side of my neck. In my dream I had the thought that it had hit an artery and that I was totally fucked.

I don't remember dreaming about work at my other jobs. Now I have some crazy vivid work related dreams. Weird.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
119
Posted by: | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 6:51 PM
horizontal rule
120

Was last night a night of an unusual number of odddreams

I dreamt that I was bitten on my left calf by several highly poisonous but small spiders that were on the end of a whip I was playing with, the whip having been placed where I found it to protect some foodstuff which I ate. (No one was wielding the whip to protect said food, it was just there.) I very calmly went to the ER where I was made to eat a pill and received several shots in my lips.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 6:59 PM
horizontal rule
121

You guys are making this stuff up, aren't you? Except for gswift. And jms.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:03 PM
horizontal rule
122

I had a dream that we elected a black guy President and I was surprised. I swear to God -- I had that dream last week. Soon I'll be dreaming that I have a talking machine in my living room that shows me pictures, and imaginary friends that I only communicate with through a little box 3 inches square.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:14 PM
horizontal rule
123

117: "I had that stupid teeth and gums rotting out of your head dream. "

I used to get that all the time. Then I quit snuff and the dreams went away.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:16 PM
horizontal rule
124

I dreamed I met an echidna on the beach. I thought, "Oh, I shouldn't approach it--it's a wild animal and won't want anything to do with me." But it ran up to me and hugged my leg. Then it wordlessly gave me to know that it wanted to go to Trader Joe's, so we went.


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:19 PM
horizontal rule
125

123: Oddly, I never had that dream until I quit sniffing glue.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:24 PM
horizontal rule
126

I really feel like I've skipped some chapters sometimes in the Unfogged narrative. I'm less thrown by the pretend-baby stuff than the "Ogged might have made up stomach cancer". I think I am too old for the Internets someday cause I can't tell when everybody's doing foolies and when they're not, unless I'm looking at Something Awful.


Posted by: Timothy Burke | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:24 PM
horizontal rule
127

nutritional yeast

And now the vague question I had about whether or not yeast was acceptable under vegan standards is answered!


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:31 PM
horizontal rule
128

126: Hello, Tim! Oddly, I was just reading some archives at The Valve and your name was mentioned.

The "ogged - pretend - stomach cancer" is a joke, of course. Even though he didn't actually have stomach cancer (but he didn't know that!)


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:36 PM
horizontal rule
129

127: If it wasn't allowed, then vegans wouldn't be able to drink would they?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 7:37 PM
horizontal rule
130

The real problem of course is the pace of the commentariat. I read about "Up" and I thinks to myself, "I have an opinion on this here subject" and then wtf it's long since progressed onto people flavoring their cooking with their own blood and flesh and talking about Cryptonomicon. And then when you see it's 800 comments, you think oh shit, this is going to be one of those threads where someone has appeared in the late innings and said something that will require a banning of the thread. Though this time I guess not. Luther Blisset has a book? Fuck yeah, I'm getting that. Not just because it's free.


Posted by: Timothy Burke | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:01 PM
horizontal rule
131

I dreamt I was an armadillo. Suddenly, I was run over by a truck!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:03 PM
horizontal rule
132

But you gave it leprosy!


Posted by: Timothy Burke | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:05 PM
horizontal rule
133

I woke up with a gear shift in my hand.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:09 PM
horizontal rule
134

129: Probably not, I suppose. I had misremembered which kingdom yeast belonged to, though, so my question was ill-put indeed. (Though really, fungi are such a weird blend of animal/plant/completely something else entirely that they do squick me out a bit while eating if I think about the biology too much. Thank god they're delicious enough that I don't care).


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
135

somewhere a trucker wonders why his transmission is now operated via penis


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
136

Grind those gears, good buddy. Over and out.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:16 PM
horizontal rule
137

Luther Blisset has books like Karen Eliot has zine articles.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
138

Whoops, didn't mean to make 137 anonymous. If it weren't for postmodern irony, we wouldn't have any irony at all.


Posted by: Karen Luther Eliot Blisset | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:28 PM
horizontal rule
139

Only the irony that is unironic is the true irony;
The jokes that can be laughed at are not the true jokes;
It was from humorlessness that humor sprang;
The laugh is but the mother that rears her ten thousand young of frowns.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:36 PM
horizontal rule
140

and my wife suddenly takes an interest in 16 wheelers


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:51 PM
horizontal rule
141

She takes-off two of the wheels? Kinky.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 8:54 PM
horizontal rule
142

The real problem of course is the pace of the commentariat.

Wait, you think this has gotten *worse*? Seems to me the pace of commenting has actually slowed a bit the past few months.

And Tim, I personally would love to hear what you have to say about Up. Just don't try to convince me that WALL-E was great.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:06 PM
horizontal rule
143

Just don't try to convince me that WALL-E was great.

You seem to handle this one OK on your own, but for the record, our whole fam damily saw it at the same time, and the votes ranged from "maybe OK" to "total crap" with the median at "meh". In theory I liked some of the ideas, but, meh. Fight the Pixar kool-aid, Toy Story followed by 15 years of meh.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:21 PM
horizontal rule
144

143: Would you change your mind if I told you it was mojito-flavored?


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:24 PM
horizontal rule
145

I haven't been to a movie in the theater in four years or so. I no longer see the point what with Netflix and the big TV.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:28 PM
horizontal rule
146

I can only count to 16


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:51 PM
horizontal rule
147

...laydeez.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 9:56 PM
horizontal rule
148

145: Honestly, the 3-D version of Up is worth going to the theater for.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 06-16-09 10:08 PM
horizontal rule
149

I have a vote for the Hugos and in principle I could cast it for WALL-E.

Mostly I think of voting NONE OF THE ABOVE in that category.

I had a dream about letting a polar bear loose on my bed (a minature one). But it was just as ferocious as a full-sized one, and it ate my cat. I was sad.


Posted by: Jesurgislac | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 3:22 AM
horizontal rule
150

121: Pars, I did not make my dream up. I don't know about these other kooks.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 6:22 AM
horizontal rule
151

143: Shrek? You don't have to give them credit for the sequels if you want because it's illegal to admit to enjoying any installments of a series past the second, but surely the first movie was better than "meh".


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 7:07 AM
horizontal rule
152

Shrek was a Dreamworks movie.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 7:11 AM
horizontal rule
153

Ah. My mistake.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 7:23 AM
horizontal rule
154

I haven't been to a movie in the theater in four years or so. I no longer see the point what with Netflix and the big TV.

So, so wrong. It's not just Up and Star Trek and the like. Everything is different on the big screen. Saw The Philadelphia Story and The Awful Truth last night, and Modern Times last week. (All part of a great summer film series.)

I hadn't seen The Awful Truth before -- I highly recommend it. I can't believe it's not in the standard canon of screwball comedies, at least as it was transmitted to me.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 8:24 AM
horizontal rule
155

154: Maybe, but if I have to set-up a baby-sitter and everything, I'd rather have a few drinks and maybe have dinner somewhere without Thomas and Friends in view.

If I'm just going to watch a movie, might as well just wait for the toddler to sleep.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 8:27 AM
horizontal rule
156

155: Sure, but don't pretend it's because you "no longer see the point." It's because children have ruined your life.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 9:00 AM
horizontal rule
157

154: plus it is against the law in all sensible jurisdictions to watch Play Time on a small screen.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 9:08 AM
horizontal rule
158

156: It's more that having a child has forced me to focus my leisure time on things that I enjoy the most. Which is eating and drinking. Reading also comes above movies.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
159

158: Oh, I know. I actually don't see movies in the theater all that often myself. I am, how you say, yanking your chain.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 9:19 AM
horizontal rule
160

I did (and still do) find that after having kids I get much more pissed off when I have "wasted" a trip to an actual theater to see a movie. And I've grown leery of my judgment as I seem to go to the wrong ones too often; Benjamin Button over Slumdog Millionaire? I'm a freaking idiot! Other stupid choices in the recent past have been The Golden Compass and Sweeney Todd. That I saw it in a theater (and after making the effort to get everyone in the family go see it as a group, "Hey kids, BuynLarge sounds clever! Look at the fake website!") added to my meh feelings about Wall-E.

There is a sometimes OK series of Midnight Movies at a big old single screen house not too far away; despite semi-hating the first half, I might be up for Jaws! on the big screen when it plays in early July.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 11:22 AM
horizontal rule
161

Benjamin Button over Slumdog Millionaire?

Ow, that smarts. You really ought to check with me before you head out next time. My track record isn't 100% (I too fell for the WALL-E hype*), but I could have told you just from the trailer to choose anything over Benjamin Button.

*I loved it while it was just WALL-E and the roach.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
162

161: I'll check with you. If I can see just one movie this summer, what should I see.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
163

to choose anything over Benjamin Button.

What really hurt was that it was me influencing an extended family choice at Xmas where I had almost, almost regained my credibility after taking an absolutely drubbing on Prêt-à-Porter. (Which you will note came out in 1994; I wasn't even allowed to offer an opinion until the 2nd Bush term.)


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 1:02 PM
horizontal rule
164

162: Showgirls at The Oaks, Saturday, July 18th midnight!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 1:03 PM
horizontal rule
165

163: Could have been worse (comment 58).


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 1:07 PM
horizontal rule
166

? I'm a freaking idiot! Other stupid choices in the recent past have been The Golden Compass and Sweeney Todd.

I really liked Sweeney Todd, but it was another example of my and Molly's poor ability to choose date movies. We get a sitter for the first time in months, try to look nice for each other, pay for a good meal... and then see a movie that is soaked in blood and makes you despair for humanity.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 1:16 PM
horizontal rule
167

164: If it's going to be a comedy, I'd prefer one that was intentionally funny.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 1:35 PM
horizontal rule
168

166: I don't see the problem there.


Posted by: Hamilton-Lovecraft | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
169

162: G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
170

166: do you always choose movies in total unfamiliarity of the basic plot?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
171

169: I saw the preview for that, and I thought it looked like a potentially interesting variant on the superhero movie, until they flashed the title.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06-17-09 7:46 PM
horizontal rule