Re: Powerball

1

It is weird how successful moves to modernization always include both the substantial (rights for women) and the superficial (no more fezzes). I like to think that an important part of modernity is precisely recognizing that rights are important and headgear is not.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 3:07 PM
horizontal rule
2

I have never purchased a single-testicled horse.


Posted by: Grumbles | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 3:07 PM
horizontal rule
3

I HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED! Why is it that as soon as I see a story saying something like "Unlike most countries, in Turkey horse bettors have 25% of their winnings confiscated by the bookie and 25% of what's left confiscated by the state", all I can think is "Wow! Natural experiment! Soooooo fruitful for behavioral economics!"


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 3:09 PM
horizontal rule
4

... and headgear is not.

So it's not important whether women wear veils or not?


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
5

2: Bilateralist.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
6

Interesting article, although it's kind of weird at the end where he's shocked, shocked! that the government would set up a gambling system so as to maximize its tax revenues without providing a realistic chance for players to win.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
7

and headgear is not

So, it's not important if your kids wear helmets when they go bike-riding?


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 3:33 PM
horizontal rule
8

and headgear is not

So you don't care if your kids are called Snaggletooth their whole lives?


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 4:05 PM
horizontal rule
9

and headgear is not

So you don't care if your children use dental dams?


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 4:16 PM
horizontal rule
10

9: If the sire only has one testicle, must we really fuss about the dam's teeth?


Posted by: Pepperfez | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:16 PM
horizontal rule
11

and headgear is not

So you don't care if Dr. Hannibal Lector eats Clarice Starling's face off?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:31 PM
horizontal rule
12

and headgear is not

So you don't care about Hallen Hpoe or Hwinter?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:42 PM
horizontal rule
13

and headgear is not

So you don't care about sombreros?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:45 PM
horizontal rule
14

and headgear is not

So you don't care about snorkel masks?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
15

and headgear is not

So you don't care about pince-nez?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
16

and headgear is not

So you don't care about masquerade balls?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:47 PM
horizontal rule
17

and headgear is not

So you don't care about beehive hairstyles?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:47 PM
horizontal rule
18

and headgear is not

So you don't care about headbands with springs attached, with balls on the ends painted to look like alien eyeballs?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:48 PM
horizontal rule
19

and headgear is not

So you don't care about Carmen Miranda's complicated fruit hats?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:49 PM
horizontal rule
20

JBS's point about veils was if like a legitimate thing to ask in comparison to fezs
i am glad he cares about women's rights


Posted by: read | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 5:58 PM
horizontal rule
21

and headgear is not

But fezzes are cool.


Posted by: The Doctor | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 6:01 PM
horizontal rule
22

4: I only care about veils to the extent that they are linked to more substantial forms of oppression, and when designing public regulation, I would target the more substantial forms of oppression.

12-19: I care a lot about Carmen Miranda's complicated fruit hats; headbands with springs attached, with balls on the ends painted to look like alien eyeballs; beehive hairstyles; masquerade balls; pince-nez; snorkel masks; and sombreros; and believe that the government should use non-coercive measures to encourage all these things. Sadly, I can't figure out what Hallen Hpoe or Hwinter are.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 7:11 PM
horizontal rule
23

I don't think I've ever seen a hipster rocking a fez. I wonder when that will become a thing.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 7:18 PM
horizontal rule
24

22

I only care about veils to the extent that they are linked to more substantial forms of oppression, and when designing public regulation, I would target the more substantial forms of oppression.

A more substantial form of oppression is acid attacks on unveiled women. One way of dealing with this is to forbid anyone wearing a veil. Of course procedural liberals wll be horrified by this idea but it might have more appeal outside the liberal bubble.


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 7:34 PM
horizontal rule
25

Are the people on the train trying to get you to wear the paper bag again?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 8:40 PM
horizontal rule
26

Speaking of Ataturk, I've often wondered about people who lead countries and when name is so closely related to the name of the country. I wonder if the psychological process of identification is different when you name yourself after the country (Ataturk) or the country after you (the House of Saud) or is unrelated except to people who can't pronounce the language (de Gaulle).


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 9:51 PM
horizontal rule
27

Don't forget Turkmenbashi!


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 10:17 PM
horizontal rule
28

Where does Captain America fall into this taxonomy?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 10:47 PM
horizontal rule
29

"In fact, the Chinese people in those days revolted not because the country was on the verge of ruin, but because they had to wear queues." (From Lu Xun, "The Story of Hair" )


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 07- 7-12 11:37 PM
horizontal rule
30

26. How about Romulus?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07- 8-12 4:38 AM
horizontal rule
31

19, 22: There are two important supreme court cases about constututional rights involving hats. The conflict between free exercise of religion by wearing hats in the Jewish tradition, and the army requirement to remove hats while saluting, was resolved In goldman v weinberger. The duty of police to advise arrestees of the right to wear fruit on their hats was established by the very famous Miranda decision.


Posted by: Unimaginative | Link to this comment | 07- 8-12 5:27 AM
horizontal rule
32

The duty of police to advise arrestees of the right to wear fruit on their hats was established by the very famous Miranda decision.

Whence we get the Lemon test.


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 07- 8-12 11:24 AM
horizontal rule
33

Does the US army take their hats off to salute? You're weird.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07- 8-12 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
34

33: That's not in my mental picture of the normal military salute. Some googling suggests it's only in certain very formal situations, like saluting the flag or to an officer in their office (in the latter case one removes headgear before entering).


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07- 8-12 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
35

33. No. Goldman was about wearing headgear indoors.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 07- 8-12 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
36

in Turkey horse bettors have 25% of their winnings confiscated by the bookie and 25% of what's left confiscated by the state

In the UK, you pick whether or not to pay the tax up front or out of winnings. Bookies tend to suggest the first option.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 07- 8-12 2:43 PM
horizontal rule
37

33: indeed. Over here we specifically never salute without a hat on.
And you never salute in the field, of course. Unless you're saluting an officer you don't like very much.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07- 9-12 2:46 AM
horizontal rule
38

In the UK, you pick whether or not to pay the tax up front or out of winnings. Bookies tend to suggest the first option.

Not for about a decade, actually. The government made a deal with the bookmaking firms that they'd drop gambling duty in return for the latter starting to pay corporation tax [1] and not moving all their internet operations to Gibraltar.

[1] Gambling winnings not, for fundamental reasons in the genealogy of the British tax system dating back to the Napoleonic wars, being taxable income.


Posted by: Richard J | Link to this comment | 07- 9-12 3:12 AM
horizontal rule
39

The government made a deal with the bookmaking firms that they'd drop gambling duty in return for the latter starting to pay corporation tax [1] and not moving all their internet operations to Gibraltar.

Whereas the US government made a "deal" where they didn't get any tax revenue and they moved all their internet operations to Antigua. Cunning.


Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Link to this comment | 07- 9-12 3:33 AM
horizontal rule
40

Goldman was about wearing headgear indoors.

Bonus caps, right?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07- 9-12 4:19 AM
horizontal rule
41

||

I just watched the Louie rape episode. It was... disturbing.

|>


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07- 9-12 7:06 AM
horizontal rule